The orthogonal complement of the orthogonal complement from “Linear Algebra Done Right” The 2019 Stack Overflow Developer Survey Results Are In Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara Planned maintenance scheduled April 17/18, 2019 at 00:00UTC (8:00pm US/Eastern)Orthogonality, proof in Linear Algebra/Functional AnalysiShow that $V = U^perp bigoplus U$Linear Algebra question about orthogonal projection (Upper Linear Algebra)Linear Algebra Proof confirmationOrthogonal Projection and Orthogonal Complement Are Orthogonal To One AnotherOrthogonal complementDouble orthogonal complement of a finite dimensional subspaceOrthogonal Complement of a Orthonormal BasisIf we have an orthonormal basis of $mathbbR^n$ how we can describe every vector in $mathbbRnT$ using them?Gram-Schmidt Procedure from “Linear Algebra Done Right”
Intergalactic human space ship encounters another ship, character gets shunted off beyond known universe, reality starts collapsing
How do spell lists change if the party levels up without taking a long rest?
Is this wall load bearing? Blueprints and photos attached
Could an empire control the whole planet with today's comunication methods?
How did passengers keep warm on sail ships?
My body leaves; my core can stay
Was credit for the black hole image misappropriated?
Do warforged have souls?
Why are PDP-7-style microprogrammed instructions out of vogue?
Why can't wing-mounted spoilers be used to steepen approaches?
How to politely respond to generic emails requesting a PhD/job in my lab? Without wasting too much time
Match Roman Numerals
How do you keep chess fun when your opponent constantly beats you?
For what reasons would an animal species NOT cross a *horizontal* land bridge?
"is" operation returns false even though two objects have same id
How to determine omitted units in a publication
Do I have Disadvantage attacking with an off-hand weapon?
Make it rain characters
Word for: a synonym with a positive connotation?
Store Dynamic-accessible hidden metadata in a cell
What to do when moving next to a bird sanctuary with a loosely-domesticated cat?
Using dividends to reduce short term capital gains?
Student Loan from years ago pops up and is taking my salary
Single author papers against my advisor's will?
The orthogonal complement of the orthogonal complement from “Linear Algebra Done Right”
The 2019 Stack Overflow Developer Survey Results Are In
Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara
Planned maintenance scheduled April 17/18, 2019 at 00:00UTC (8:00pm US/Eastern)Orthogonality, proof in Linear Algebra/Functional AnalysiShow that $V = U^perp bigoplus U$Linear Algebra question about orthogonal projection (Upper Linear Algebra)Linear Algebra Proof confirmationOrthogonal Projection and Orthogonal Complement Are Orthogonal To One AnotherOrthogonal complementDouble orthogonal complement of a finite dimensional subspaceOrthogonal Complement of a Orthonormal BasisIf we have an orthonormal basis of $mathbbR^n$ how we can describe every vector in $mathbbRnT$ using them?Gram-Schmidt Procedure from “Linear Algebra Done Right”
$begingroup$
The following content is from "Linear Algebra Done Right" by Sheldon Axler
Corollary: Suppose $U$ is a finite-dimensional subspace of $V$. Then $$U = (U ^perp)^perp.$$
We need to prove the following: i) $U subseteq (U^perp)^perp$ and
ii) $(U^perp)^perp subseteq U$
Proof i): Supposer $u in U$. Then $langle u,v rangle = 0$ for $v in U^perp$. Since all vector $u$ is orthogonal to $v$. Then $u in U$. Hence $u in (U ^perp)^perp$
I do understand the proof for i) as stated in the above.
But I'm confused about the proof in ii)
ii) Let $u in (U ^perp)^perp$ From Proposition 2, we have that $V = U bigoplus U^perp$. and so $u$ can be written as $u=v+w$ where $v in U$ and $w in U^perp$. But $u - v = w$, so $u - v in U^perp$.
Now we already have that $u in (U ^perp)^perp$ and $v in (U ^perp)^perp$ and $u - v in (U ^perp)^perp$. Therfore, $u - v in U ^perp cap (U^perp)^perp$.
***Here is where I don't understand! Why we can let $u = v + w$, but since $u in (U ^perp)^perp$? and Why does $u - v in U ^perp cap (U^perp)^perp$?
linear-algebra abstract-algebra proof-verification orthogonality
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
The following content is from "Linear Algebra Done Right" by Sheldon Axler
Corollary: Suppose $U$ is a finite-dimensional subspace of $V$. Then $$U = (U ^perp)^perp.$$
We need to prove the following: i) $U subseteq (U^perp)^perp$ and
ii) $(U^perp)^perp subseteq U$
Proof i): Supposer $u in U$. Then $langle u,v rangle = 0$ for $v in U^perp$. Since all vector $u$ is orthogonal to $v$. Then $u in U$. Hence $u in (U ^perp)^perp$
I do understand the proof for i) as stated in the above.
But I'm confused about the proof in ii)
ii) Let $u in (U ^perp)^perp$ From Proposition 2, we have that $V = U bigoplus U^perp$. and so $u$ can be written as $u=v+w$ where $v in U$ and $w in U^perp$. But $u - v = w$, so $u - v in U^perp$.
Now we already have that $u in (U ^perp)^perp$ and $v in (U ^perp)^perp$ and $u - v in (U ^perp)^perp$. Therfore, $u - v in U ^perp cap (U^perp)^perp$.
***Here is where I don't understand! Why we can let $u = v + w$, but since $u in (U ^perp)^perp$? and Why does $u - v in U ^perp cap (U^perp)^perp$?
linear-algebra abstract-algebra proof-verification orthogonality
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Since $u - v in U ^perp $ and $u - v in (U^perp)^perp$, it follows that $u - v in U^perp cap (U^perp)^perp$
$endgroup$
– J. W. Tanner
Mar 24 at 16:51
$begingroup$
Thanks! I got how $u - v in U^perp cap (U^perp)^perp$ work right now. But I don't get why we can let $u = v + w$, but since $u in (U^perp)^perp$
$endgroup$
– Algorisum
Mar 24 at 16:52
$begingroup$
Wait, how is $U oplus U^perp = V$ ? How is $U^perp$ even a subspace of $V$? Are we in an inner product space?
$endgroup$
– darij grinberg
Mar 24 at 18:53
$begingroup$
You should declare what $V$ is, and in particular what $U^perp$ is. I suspect you mean $V$ to be an inner product space over real or complex numbers, and $U^perp$ to be the orthogonal complement, but in general, $U^perp$ may either not make sense, or $(U^perp)^perp$ may be much bigger than $U$.
$endgroup$
– tomasz
Mar 24 at 18:56
add a comment |
$begingroup$
The following content is from "Linear Algebra Done Right" by Sheldon Axler
Corollary: Suppose $U$ is a finite-dimensional subspace of $V$. Then $$U = (U ^perp)^perp.$$
We need to prove the following: i) $U subseteq (U^perp)^perp$ and
ii) $(U^perp)^perp subseteq U$
Proof i): Supposer $u in U$. Then $langle u,v rangle = 0$ for $v in U^perp$. Since all vector $u$ is orthogonal to $v$. Then $u in U$. Hence $u in (U ^perp)^perp$
I do understand the proof for i) as stated in the above.
But I'm confused about the proof in ii)
ii) Let $u in (U ^perp)^perp$ From Proposition 2, we have that $V = U bigoplus U^perp$. and so $u$ can be written as $u=v+w$ where $v in U$ and $w in U^perp$. But $u - v = w$, so $u - v in U^perp$.
Now we already have that $u in (U ^perp)^perp$ and $v in (U ^perp)^perp$ and $u - v in (U ^perp)^perp$. Therfore, $u - v in U ^perp cap (U^perp)^perp$.
***Here is where I don't understand! Why we can let $u = v + w$, but since $u in (U ^perp)^perp$? and Why does $u - v in U ^perp cap (U^perp)^perp$?
linear-algebra abstract-algebra proof-verification orthogonality
$endgroup$
The following content is from "Linear Algebra Done Right" by Sheldon Axler
Corollary: Suppose $U$ is a finite-dimensional subspace of $V$. Then $$U = (U ^perp)^perp.$$
We need to prove the following: i) $U subseteq (U^perp)^perp$ and
ii) $(U^perp)^perp subseteq U$
Proof i): Supposer $u in U$. Then $langle u,v rangle = 0$ for $v in U^perp$. Since all vector $u$ is orthogonal to $v$. Then $u in U$. Hence $u in (U ^perp)^perp$
I do understand the proof for i) as stated in the above.
But I'm confused about the proof in ii)
ii) Let $u in (U ^perp)^perp$ From Proposition 2, we have that $V = U bigoplus U^perp$. and so $u$ can be written as $u=v+w$ where $v in U$ and $w in U^perp$. But $u - v = w$, so $u - v in U^perp$.
Now we already have that $u in (U ^perp)^perp$ and $v in (U ^perp)^perp$ and $u - v in (U ^perp)^perp$. Therfore, $u - v in U ^perp cap (U^perp)^perp$.
***Here is where I don't understand! Why we can let $u = v + w$, but since $u in (U ^perp)^perp$? and Why does $u - v in U ^perp cap (U^perp)^perp$?
linear-algebra abstract-algebra proof-verification orthogonality
linear-algebra abstract-algebra proof-verification orthogonality
edited Mar 24 at 18:51
darij grinberg
11.5k33168
11.5k33168
asked Mar 24 at 16:35
AlgorisumAlgorisum
457
457
$begingroup$
Since $u - v in U ^perp $ and $u - v in (U^perp)^perp$, it follows that $u - v in U^perp cap (U^perp)^perp$
$endgroup$
– J. W. Tanner
Mar 24 at 16:51
$begingroup$
Thanks! I got how $u - v in U^perp cap (U^perp)^perp$ work right now. But I don't get why we can let $u = v + w$, but since $u in (U^perp)^perp$
$endgroup$
– Algorisum
Mar 24 at 16:52
$begingroup$
Wait, how is $U oplus U^perp = V$ ? How is $U^perp$ even a subspace of $V$? Are we in an inner product space?
$endgroup$
– darij grinberg
Mar 24 at 18:53
$begingroup$
You should declare what $V$ is, and in particular what $U^perp$ is. I suspect you mean $V$ to be an inner product space over real or complex numbers, and $U^perp$ to be the orthogonal complement, but in general, $U^perp$ may either not make sense, or $(U^perp)^perp$ may be much bigger than $U$.
$endgroup$
– tomasz
Mar 24 at 18:56
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Since $u - v in U ^perp $ and $u - v in (U^perp)^perp$, it follows that $u - v in U^perp cap (U^perp)^perp$
$endgroup$
– J. W. Tanner
Mar 24 at 16:51
$begingroup$
Thanks! I got how $u - v in U^perp cap (U^perp)^perp$ work right now. But I don't get why we can let $u = v + w$, but since $u in (U^perp)^perp$
$endgroup$
– Algorisum
Mar 24 at 16:52
$begingroup$
Wait, how is $U oplus U^perp = V$ ? How is $U^perp$ even a subspace of $V$? Are we in an inner product space?
$endgroup$
– darij grinberg
Mar 24 at 18:53
$begingroup$
You should declare what $V$ is, and in particular what $U^perp$ is. I suspect you mean $V$ to be an inner product space over real or complex numbers, and $U^perp$ to be the orthogonal complement, but in general, $U^perp$ may either not make sense, or $(U^perp)^perp$ may be much bigger than $U$.
$endgroup$
– tomasz
Mar 24 at 18:56
$begingroup$
Since $u - v in U ^perp $ and $u - v in (U^perp)^perp$, it follows that $u - v in U^perp cap (U^perp)^perp$
$endgroup$
– J. W. Tanner
Mar 24 at 16:51
$begingroup$
Since $u - v in U ^perp $ and $u - v in (U^perp)^perp$, it follows that $u - v in U^perp cap (U^perp)^perp$
$endgroup$
– J. W. Tanner
Mar 24 at 16:51
$begingroup$
Thanks! I got how $u - v in U^perp cap (U^perp)^perp$ work right now. But I don't get why we can let $u = v + w$, but since $u in (U^perp)^perp$
$endgroup$
– Algorisum
Mar 24 at 16:52
$begingroup$
Thanks! I got how $u - v in U^perp cap (U^perp)^perp$ work right now. But I don't get why we can let $u = v + w$, but since $u in (U^perp)^perp$
$endgroup$
– Algorisum
Mar 24 at 16:52
$begingroup$
Wait, how is $U oplus U^perp = V$ ? How is $U^perp$ even a subspace of $V$? Are we in an inner product space?
$endgroup$
– darij grinberg
Mar 24 at 18:53
$begingroup$
Wait, how is $U oplus U^perp = V$ ? How is $U^perp$ even a subspace of $V$? Are we in an inner product space?
$endgroup$
– darij grinberg
Mar 24 at 18:53
$begingroup$
You should declare what $V$ is, and in particular what $U^perp$ is. I suspect you mean $V$ to be an inner product space over real or complex numbers, and $U^perp$ to be the orthogonal complement, but in general, $U^perp$ may either not make sense, or $(U^perp)^perp$ may be much bigger than $U$.
$endgroup$
– tomasz
Mar 24 at 18:56
$begingroup$
You should declare what $V$ is, and in particular what $U^perp$ is. I suspect you mean $V$ to be an inner product space over real or complex numbers, and $U^perp$ to be the orthogonal complement, but in general, $U^perp$ may either not make sense, or $(U^perp)^perp$ may be much bigger than $U$.
$endgroup$
– tomasz
Mar 24 at 18:56
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
Since $V=Uoplus U^perp$, every vector in $V$ can be written as a sum of a vector in $U$ and a vector in $U^perp$.
This holds, in particular, for $uin(U^perp)^perp$. So, according to Axler, write
$$
u=v+w,qquad vin U, win U^perp
$$
Now apply the assumption that $uin(U^perp)^perp$ and the fact that $vin Usubseteq(U^perp)^perp$ to conclude that
$$
w=u-vin(U^perp)^perp
$$
as well. On the other hand, $win U^perp$ by hypothesis. Therefore
$$
w=u-vin U^perpcap(U^perp)^perp
$$
A general result about orthogonal complements is that, for every subspace $X$, $Xcap X^perp=0$. This holds in particular for $X=U^perp$.
Hence $w=u-v=0$, so $u=vin U$.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Since $V = U oplus U^perp$, then U is a subspace of vector space V. But why does $u in (U^perp)^perp$ be equal to V, Since $u = v + w$?
$endgroup$
– Algorisum
Mar 24 at 16:59
$begingroup$
@Algorisum $u$ is an element of $V$. Every element of $V$ can be written as $v+w$ for some $vin U$ and $win U^perp$.
$endgroup$
– egreg
Mar 24 at 17:03
$begingroup$
Yes.... I forget about that. Thank you
$endgroup$
– Algorisum
Mar 24 at 17:05
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);
else
createEditor();
);
function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);
);
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3160750%2fthe-orthogonal-complement-of-the-orthogonal-complement-from-linear-algebra-done%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
Since $V=Uoplus U^perp$, every vector in $V$ can be written as a sum of a vector in $U$ and a vector in $U^perp$.
This holds, in particular, for $uin(U^perp)^perp$. So, according to Axler, write
$$
u=v+w,qquad vin U, win U^perp
$$
Now apply the assumption that $uin(U^perp)^perp$ and the fact that $vin Usubseteq(U^perp)^perp$ to conclude that
$$
w=u-vin(U^perp)^perp
$$
as well. On the other hand, $win U^perp$ by hypothesis. Therefore
$$
w=u-vin U^perpcap(U^perp)^perp
$$
A general result about orthogonal complements is that, for every subspace $X$, $Xcap X^perp=0$. This holds in particular for $X=U^perp$.
Hence $w=u-v=0$, so $u=vin U$.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Since $V = U oplus U^perp$, then U is a subspace of vector space V. But why does $u in (U^perp)^perp$ be equal to V, Since $u = v + w$?
$endgroup$
– Algorisum
Mar 24 at 16:59
$begingroup$
@Algorisum $u$ is an element of $V$. Every element of $V$ can be written as $v+w$ for some $vin U$ and $win U^perp$.
$endgroup$
– egreg
Mar 24 at 17:03
$begingroup$
Yes.... I forget about that. Thank you
$endgroup$
– Algorisum
Mar 24 at 17:05
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Since $V=Uoplus U^perp$, every vector in $V$ can be written as a sum of a vector in $U$ and a vector in $U^perp$.
This holds, in particular, for $uin(U^perp)^perp$. So, according to Axler, write
$$
u=v+w,qquad vin U, win U^perp
$$
Now apply the assumption that $uin(U^perp)^perp$ and the fact that $vin Usubseteq(U^perp)^perp$ to conclude that
$$
w=u-vin(U^perp)^perp
$$
as well. On the other hand, $win U^perp$ by hypothesis. Therefore
$$
w=u-vin U^perpcap(U^perp)^perp
$$
A general result about orthogonal complements is that, for every subspace $X$, $Xcap X^perp=0$. This holds in particular for $X=U^perp$.
Hence $w=u-v=0$, so $u=vin U$.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Since $V = U oplus U^perp$, then U is a subspace of vector space V. But why does $u in (U^perp)^perp$ be equal to V, Since $u = v + w$?
$endgroup$
– Algorisum
Mar 24 at 16:59
$begingroup$
@Algorisum $u$ is an element of $V$. Every element of $V$ can be written as $v+w$ for some $vin U$ and $win U^perp$.
$endgroup$
– egreg
Mar 24 at 17:03
$begingroup$
Yes.... I forget about that. Thank you
$endgroup$
– Algorisum
Mar 24 at 17:05
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Since $V=Uoplus U^perp$, every vector in $V$ can be written as a sum of a vector in $U$ and a vector in $U^perp$.
This holds, in particular, for $uin(U^perp)^perp$. So, according to Axler, write
$$
u=v+w,qquad vin U, win U^perp
$$
Now apply the assumption that $uin(U^perp)^perp$ and the fact that $vin Usubseteq(U^perp)^perp$ to conclude that
$$
w=u-vin(U^perp)^perp
$$
as well. On the other hand, $win U^perp$ by hypothesis. Therefore
$$
w=u-vin U^perpcap(U^perp)^perp
$$
A general result about orthogonal complements is that, for every subspace $X$, $Xcap X^perp=0$. This holds in particular for $X=U^perp$.
Hence $w=u-v=0$, so $u=vin U$.
$endgroup$
Since $V=Uoplus U^perp$, every vector in $V$ can be written as a sum of a vector in $U$ and a vector in $U^perp$.
This holds, in particular, for $uin(U^perp)^perp$. So, according to Axler, write
$$
u=v+w,qquad vin U, win U^perp
$$
Now apply the assumption that $uin(U^perp)^perp$ and the fact that $vin Usubseteq(U^perp)^perp$ to conclude that
$$
w=u-vin(U^perp)^perp
$$
as well. On the other hand, $win U^perp$ by hypothesis. Therefore
$$
w=u-vin U^perpcap(U^perp)^perp
$$
A general result about orthogonal complements is that, for every subspace $X$, $Xcap X^perp=0$. This holds in particular for $X=U^perp$.
Hence $w=u-v=0$, so $u=vin U$.
answered Mar 24 at 16:53
egregegreg
186k1486208
186k1486208
$begingroup$
Since $V = U oplus U^perp$, then U is a subspace of vector space V. But why does $u in (U^perp)^perp$ be equal to V, Since $u = v + w$?
$endgroup$
– Algorisum
Mar 24 at 16:59
$begingroup$
@Algorisum $u$ is an element of $V$. Every element of $V$ can be written as $v+w$ for some $vin U$ and $win U^perp$.
$endgroup$
– egreg
Mar 24 at 17:03
$begingroup$
Yes.... I forget about that. Thank you
$endgroup$
– Algorisum
Mar 24 at 17:05
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Since $V = U oplus U^perp$, then U is a subspace of vector space V. But why does $u in (U^perp)^perp$ be equal to V, Since $u = v + w$?
$endgroup$
– Algorisum
Mar 24 at 16:59
$begingroup$
@Algorisum $u$ is an element of $V$. Every element of $V$ can be written as $v+w$ for some $vin U$ and $win U^perp$.
$endgroup$
– egreg
Mar 24 at 17:03
$begingroup$
Yes.... I forget about that. Thank you
$endgroup$
– Algorisum
Mar 24 at 17:05
$begingroup$
Since $V = U oplus U^perp$, then U is a subspace of vector space V. But why does $u in (U^perp)^perp$ be equal to V, Since $u = v + w$?
$endgroup$
– Algorisum
Mar 24 at 16:59
$begingroup$
Since $V = U oplus U^perp$, then U is a subspace of vector space V. But why does $u in (U^perp)^perp$ be equal to V, Since $u = v + w$?
$endgroup$
– Algorisum
Mar 24 at 16:59
$begingroup$
@Algorisum $u$ is an element of $V$. Every element of $V$ can be written as $v+w$ for some $vin U$ and $win U^perp$.
$endgroup$
– egreg
Mar 24 at 17:03
$begingroup$
@Algorisum $u$ is an element of $V$. Every element of $V$ can be written as $v+w$ for some $vin U$ and $win U^perp$.
$endgroup$
– egreg
Mar 24 at 17:03
$begingroup$
Yes.... I forget about that. Thank you
$endgroup$
– Algorisum
Mar 24 at 17:05
$begingroup$
Yes.... I forget about that. Thank you
$endgroup$
– Algorisum
Mar 24 at 17:05
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3160750%2fthe-orthogonal-complement-of-the-orthogonal-complement-from-linear-algebra-done%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
$begingroup$
Since $u - v in U ^perp $ and $u - v in (U^perp)^perp$, it follows that $u - v in U^perp cap (U^perp)^perp$
$endgroup$
– J. W. Tanner
Mar 24 at 16:51
$begingroup$
Thanks! I got how $u - v in U^perp cap (U^perp)^perp$ work right now. But I don't get why we can let $u = v + w$, but since $u in (U^perp)^perp$
$endgroup$
– Algorisum
Mar 24 at 16:52
$begingroup$
Wait, how is $U oplus U^perp = V$ ? How is $U^perp$ even a subspace of $V$? Are we in an inner product space?
$endgroup$
– darij grinberg
Mar 24 at 18:53
$begingroup$
You should declare what $V$ is, and in particular what $U^perp$ is. I suspect you mean $V$ to be an inner product space over real or complex numbers, and $U^perp$ to be the orthogonal complement, but in general, $U^perp$ may either not make sense, or $(U^perp)^perp$ may be much bigger than $U$.
$endgroup$
– tomasz
Mar 24 at 18:56