Expressing the wave equation solution by separation of variables as a superposition of forward and backward waves.Solving the wave equation with Neumann conditionsWhat condition does this impose on the coefficients $ B_n$ in the vibrating string problemWhen solving the wave equation by separation of variables, is the separation constant always negative?Method of separation of variables in a wave problemFinding particular solution to 1D - wave equation given general solution.Wave Equation by separation of variablesSolving the wave equation with Neumann boundary conditionsRigorous solution of wave equation for string with fixed endsFinding the constants $A$ and $B$ for the general series solution of the wave equation with initial condition $g(x) = max 8x − 4$A partial solution to the wave equation
Gaining more land
What is the generally accepted pronunciation of “topoi”?
Why do we say ‘pairwise disjoint’, rather than ‘disjoint’?
QQ Plot and Shapiro Wilk Test Disagree
Dynamic Linkage of LocatorPane and InputField
What are some noteworthy "mic-drop" moments in math?
What is the population of Romulus in the TNG era?
Signed and unsigned numbers
Proving a statement about real numbers
Why is a very small peak with larger m/z not considered to be the molecular ion?
Can the alpha, lambda values of a glmnet object output determine whether ridge or Lasso?
Can we track matter through time by looking at different depths in space?
Vocabulary for giving just numbers, not a full answer
What sort of fish is this
Can I negotiate a patent idea for a raise, under French law?
What do you call someone who likes to pick fights?
Specifying a starting column with colortbl package and xcolor
How exactly does an Ethernet collision happen in the cable, since nodes use different circuits for Tx and Rx?
Does Christianity allow for believing on someone else's behalf?
Virginia employer terminated employee and wants signing bonus returned
ER diagram relationship node size adjustment
School performs periodic password audits. Is my password compromised?
Does a difference of tense count as a difference of meaning in a minimal pair?
When Schnorr signatures are part of Bitcoin will it be possible validate each block with only one signature validation?
Expressing the wave equation solution by separation of variables as a superposition of forward and backward waves.
Solving the wave equation with Neumann conditionsWhat condition does this impose on the coefficients $ B_n$ in the vibrating string problemWhen solving the wave equation by separation of variables, is the separation constant always negative?Method of separation of variables in a wave problemFinding particular solution to 1D - wave equation given general solution.Wave Equation by separation of variablesSolving the wave equation with Neumann boundary conditionsRigorous solution of wave equation for string with fixed endsFinding the constants $A$ and $B$ for the general series solution of the wave equation with initial condition $g(x) = max 8x − 4$A partial solution to the wave equation
$begingroup$
(From an exercise in Pinchover's Introduction to Partial Differential Equations).
$$u(x,t)=fracA_0 + B_0 t2+sum_n=1^infty left(A_ncosfraccpi ntL+ B_nsinfraccpi ntLright)cosfracnpi xL$$
is a general (and formal, at least) solution to the vibrating string with fixed ends. How to write this as a superposition of a forward and a backward wave? That is, as $f(x+ct)+f(x-ct)$ for some $f$. (No need to worry about rigour here, an heuristic will do.)
I know, by elementary trigonometry, that $$left(A_ncosfraccpi ntL+ B_nsinfraccpi ntLright)cosfracnpi xL =\= (1/2)(A_ncos +B_nsin)left(fraccpi ntL + fracnpi xLright)+(1/2)(A_ncos +B_nsin)left(fraccpi ntL - fracnpi xLright), $$ but this doesn't seem to work because the variable $x$ is the one that changes sign, so apparently this cannot be interpreted as a sum of forward and backward waves.
Is there a workaround to this?
EDIT. The second wave is from another function $g$. The answer is then straightforward after oen's comment.
analysis pde physics fourier-series wave-equation
$endgroup$
|
show 1 more comment
$begingroup$
(From an exercise in Pinchover's Introduction to Partial Differential Equations).
$$u(x,t)=fracA_0 + B_0 t2+sum_n=1^infty left(A_ncosfraccpi ntL+ B_nsinfraccpi ntLright)cosfracnpi xL$$
is a general (and formal, at least) solution to the vibrating string with fixed ends. How to write this as a superposition of a forward and a backward wave? That is, as $f(x+ct)+f(x-ct)$ for some $f$. (No need to worry about rigour here, an heuristic will do.)
I know, by elementary trigonometry, that $$left(A_ncosfraccpi ntL+ B_nsinfraccpi ntLright)cosfracnpi xL =\= (1/2)(A_ncos +B_nsin)left(fraccpi ntL + fracnpi xLright)+(1/2)(A_ncos +B_nsin)left(fraccpi ntL - fracnpi xLright), $$ but this doesn't seem to work because the variable $x$ is the one that changes sign, so apparently this cannot be interpreted as a sum of forward and backward waves.
Is there a workaround to this?
EDIT. The second wave is from another function $g$. The answer is then straightforward after oen's comment.
analysis pde physics fourier-series wave-equation
$endgroup$
2
$begingroup$
Wait a minute: shouldn't the superposition of arbitrary forward and backward waves be of the form $f(x+ct)+g(x-ct)$? Then oen's observation should help you resolve the issue...
$endgroup$
– anon
Jul 17 '12 at 1:29
$begingroup$
@anon You're right. Stupid me.
$endgroup$
– Weltschmerz
Jul 17 '12 at 1:42
$begingroup$
@anon: Thanks for the careful reading. I skipped right over $f(x+t) + f(x-t)$ ...
$endgroup$
– user26872
Jul 17 '12 at 1:44
$begingroup$
@Weltschmerz: Typos happen to everybody!
$endgroup$
– user26872
Jul 17 '12 at 1:46
2
$begingroup$
Write $$a+bt=v(x+ct)+w(x-ct)=(v+w)x+(v-w)ct$$ where $v,w$ are constants and solve the subsequent linear system.
$endgroup$
– anon
Jul 17 '12 at 2:23
|
show 1 more comment
$begingroup$
(From an exercise in Pinchover's Introduction to Partial Differential Equations).
$$u(x,t)=fracA_0 + B_0 t2+sum_n=1^infty left(A_ncosfraccpi ntL+ B_nsinfraccpi ntLright)cosfracnpi xL$$
is a general (and formal, at least) solution to the vibrating string with fixed ends. How to write this as a superposition of a forward and a backward wave? That is, as $f(x+ct)+f(x-ct)$ for some $f$. (No need to worry about rigour here, an heuristic will do.)
I know, by elementary trigonometry, that $$left(A_ncosfraccpi ntL+ B_nsinfraccpi ntLright)cosfracnpi xL =\= (1/2)(A_ncos +B_nsin)left(fraccpi ntL + fracnpi xLright)+(1/2)(A_ncos +B_nsin)left(fraccpi ntL - fracnpi xLright), $$ but this doesn't seem to work because the variable $x$ is the one that changes sign, so apparently this cannot be interpreted as a sum of forward and backward waves.
Is there a workaround to this?
EDIT. The second wave is from another function $g$. The answer is then straightforward after oen's comment.
analysis pde physics fourier-series wave-equation
$endgroup$
(From an exercise in Pinchover's Introduction to Partial Differential Equations).
$$u(x,t)=fracA_0 + B_0 t2+sum_n=1^infty left(A_ncosfraccpi ntL+ B_nsinfraccpi ntLright)cosfracnpi xL$$
is a general (and formal, at least) solution to the vibrating string with fixed ends. How to write this as a superposition of a forward and a backward wave? That is, as $f(x+ct)+f(x-ct)$ for some $f$. (No need to worry about rigour here, an heuristic will do.)
I know, by elementary trigonometry, that $$left(A_ncosfraccpi ntL+ B_nsinfraccpi ntLright)cosfracnpi xL =\= (1/2)(A_ncos +B_nsin)left(fraccpi ntL + fracnpi xLright)+(1/2)(A_ncos +B_nsin)left(fraccpi ntL - fracnpi xLright), $$ but this doesn't seem to work because the variable $x$ is the one that changes sign, so apparently this cannot be interpreted as a sum of forward and backward waves.
Is there a workaround to this?
EDIT. The second wave is from another function $g$. The answer is then straightforward after oen's comment.
analysis pde physics fourier-series wave-equation
analysis pde physics fourier-series wave-equation
edited yesterday
Andrews
1,2641420
1,2641420
asked Jul 17 '12 at 1:14
WeltschmerzWeltschmerz
4,0622041
4,0622041
2
$begingroup$
Wait a minute: shouldn't the superposition of arbitrary forward and backward waves be of the form $f(x+ct)+g(x-ct)$? Then oen's observation should help you resolve the issue...
$endgroup$
– anon
Jul 17 '12 at 1:29
$begingroup$
@anon You're right. Stupid me.
$endgroup$
– Weltschmerz
Jul 17 '12 at 1:42
$begingroup$
@anon: Thanks for the careful reading. I skipped right over $f(x+t) + f(x-t)$ ...
$endgroup$
– user26872
Jul 17 '12 at 1:44
$begingroup$
@Weltschmerz: Typos happen to everybody!
$endgroup$
– user26872
Jul 17 '12 at 1:46
2
$begingroup$
Write $$a+bt=v(x+ct)+w(x-ct)=(v+w)x+(v-w)ct$$ where $v,w$ are constants and solve the subsequent linear system.
$endgroup$
– anon
Jul 17 '12 at 2:23
|
show 1 more comment
2
$begingroup$
Wait a minute: shouldn't the superposition of arbitrary forward and backward waves be of the form $f(x+ct)+g(x-ct)$? Then oen's observation should help you resolve the issue...
$endgroup$
– anon
Jul 17 '12 at 1:29
$begingroup$
@anon You're right. Stupid me.
$endgroup$
– Weltschmerz
Jul 17 '12 at 1:42
$begingroup$
@anon: Thanks for the careful reading. I skipped right over $f(x+t) + f(x-t)$ ...
$endgroup$
– user26872
Jul 17 '12 at 1:44
$begingroup$
@Weltschmerz: Typos happen to everybody!
$endgroup$
– user26872
Jul 17 '12 at 1:46
2
$begingroup$
Write $$a+bt=v(x+ct)+w(x-ct)=(v+w)x+(v-w)ct$$ where $v,w$ are constants and solve the subsequent linear system.
$endgroup$
– anon
Jul 17 '12 at 2:23
2
2
$begingroup$
Wait a minute: shouldn't the superposition of arbitrary forward and backward waves be of the form $f(x+ct)+g(x-ct)$? Then oen's observation should help you resolve the issue...
$endgroup$
– anon
Jul 17 '12 at 1:29
$begingroup$
Wait a minute: shouldn't the superposition of arbitrary forward and backward waves be of the form $f(x+ct)+g(x-ct)$? Then oen's observation should help you resolve the issue...
$endgroup$
– anon
Jul 17 '12 at 1:29
$begingroup$
@anon You're right. Stupid me.
$endgroup$
– Weltschmerz
Jul 17 '12 at 1:42
$begingroup$
@anon You're right. Stupid me.
$endgroup$
– Weltschmerz
Jul 17 '12 at 1:42
$begingroup$
@anon: Thanks for the careful reading. I skipped right over $f(x+t) + f(x-t)$ ...
$endgroup$
– user26872
Jul 17 '12 at 1:44
$begingroup$
@anon: Thanks for the careful reading. I skipped right over $f(x+t) + f(x-t)$ ...
$endgroup$
– user26872
Jul 17 '12 at 1:44
$begingroup$
@Weltschmerz: Typos happen to everybody!
$endgroup$
– user26872
Jul 17 '12 at 1:46
$begingroup$
@Weltschmerz: Typos happen to everybody!
$endgroup$
– user26872
Jul 17 '12 at 1:46
2
2
$begingroup$
Write $$a+bt=v(x+ct)+w(x-ct)=(v+w)x+(v-w)ct$$ where $v,w$ are constants and solve the subsequent linear system.
$endgroup$
– anon
Jul 17 '12 at 2:23
$begingroup$
Write $$a+bt=v(x+ct)+w(x-ct)=(v+w)x+(v-w)ct$$ where $v,w$ are constants and solve the subsequent linear system.
$endgroup$
– anon
Jul 17 '12 at 2:23
|
show 1 more comment
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
Notice that $cos(t-x) = cos(x-t)$ and $sin(t-x) = -sin(x-t)$.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
);
);
, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);
else
createEditor();
);
function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);
);
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f171736%2fexpressing-the-wave-equation-solution-by-separation-of-variables-as-a-superposit%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
Notice that $cos(t-x) = cos(x-t)$ and $sin(t-x) = -sin(x-t)$.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Notice that $cos(t-x) = cos(x-t)$ and $sin(t-x) = -sin(x-t)$.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Notice that $cos(t-x) = cos(x-t)$ and $sin(t-x) = -sin(x-t)$.
$endgroup$
Notice that $cos(t-x) = cos(x-t)$ and $sin(t-x) = -sin(x-t)$.
answered Jul 17 '12 at 1:20
user26872user26872
14.9k22773
14.9k22773
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f171736%2fexpressing-the-wave-equation-solution-by-separation-of-variables-as-a-superposit%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
2
$begingroup$
Wait a minute: shouldn't the superposition of arbitrary forward and backward waves be of the form $f(x+ct)+g(x-ct)$? Then oen's observation should help you resolve the issue...
$endgroup$
– anon
Jul 17 '12 at 1:29
$begingroup$
@anon You're right. Stupid me.
$endgroup$
– Weltschmerz
Jul 17 '12 at 1:42
$begingroup$
@anon: Thanks for the careful reading. I skipped right over $f(x+t) + f(x-t)$ ...
$endgroup$
– user26872
Jul 17 '12 at 1:44
$begingroup$
@Weltschmerz: Typos happen to everybody!
$endgroup$
– user26872
Jul 17 '12 at 1:46
2
$begingroup$
Write $$a+bt=v(x+ct)+w(x-ct)=(v+w)x+(v-w)ct$$ where $v,w$ are constants and solve the subsequent linear system.
$endgroup$
– anon
Jul 17 '12 at 2:23