Show that $f_nto f$ uniformly on $mathbbR$Suppose that $f$ is uniformly continuous on $R$ and let $f_n (x)=f(x+frac1n)$. Prove that $f_n$ converges uniformly to $f$.Prove that $int_-infty^infty P_n(x) , dx = pi /n$Is $(epsilon + cos(x))^2k_kinmathbbN$ a family of good kernels?$f_n$ is uniformly integrable if and only if $sup_n int |f_n|,dmu < infty$ and $f_n$ is uniformly absolutely continuous?Suppose $f_n to f $ uniformly on $ R$ what can we say about $ f$?derivative of the Fourier seriesBasic Fourier analysis - Summability kernels over $mathbbR$$sum_n geq 1 |c_n|^2 leq frac 18$Given $P_n(x)=fracn1+n^2x^2,$ Prove $f_n(x)=frac1piint_-infty^infty f(x-t)P_n(t)$ converges uniformlyLimit is $0$ uniformly for fourier coefficients

Multi tool use
Multi tool use

What can I do if someone tampers with my SSH public key?

Street obstacles in New Zealand

Why is a very small peak with larger m/z not considered to be the molecular ion?

What ability score modifier does a javelin's damage use?

Are there historical instances of the capital of a colonising country being temporarily or permanently shifted to one of its colonies?

Signed and unsigned numbers

Has a sovereign Communist government ever run, and conceded loss, on a fair election?

What do *foreign films* mean for an American?

Should I take out a loan for a friend to invest on my behalf?

How many characters using PHB rules does it take to be able to have access to any PHB spell at the start of an adventuring day?

Why does Solve lock up when trying to solve the quadratic equation with large integers?

How can I find out information about a service?

What materials can be used to make a humanoid skin warm?

Outlet with 3 sets of wires

Why do we say ‘pairwise disjoint’, rather than ‘disjoint’?

Does Christianity allow for believing on someone else's behalf?

What is better: yes / no radio, or simple checkbox?

Doubts in understanding some concepts of potential energy

Are all players supposed to be able to see each others' character sheets?

From an axiomatic set theoric approach why can we take uncountable unions?

Plausibility of Mushroom Buildings

When a wind turbine does not produce enough electricity how does the power company compensate for the loss?

Vocabulary for giving just numbers, not a full answer

What are some noteworthy "mic-drop" moments in math?



Show that $f_nto f$ uniformly on $mathbbR$


Suppose that $f$ is uniformly continuous on $R$ and let $f_n (x)=f(x+frac1n)$. Prove that $f_n$ converges uniformly to $f$.Prove that $int_-infty^infty P_n(x) , dx = pi /n$Is $(epsilon + cos(x))^2k_kinmathbbN$ a family of good kernels?$f_n$ is uniformly integrable if and only if $sup_n int |f_n|,dmu < infty$ and $f_n$ is uniformly absolutely continuous?Suppose $f_n to f $ uniformly on $ R$ what can we say about $ f$?derivative of the Fourier seriesBasic Fourier analysis - Summability kernels over $mathbbR$$sum_n geq 1 |c_n|^2 leq frac 18$Given $P_n(x)=fracn1+n^2x^2,$ Prove $f_n(x)=frac1piint_-infty^infty f(x-t)P_n(t)$ converges uniformlyLimit is $0$ uniformly for fourier coefficients













8












$begingroup$


Let $$P_n(x) = fracn1+n^2x^2$$.



First, I had to prove that



$$int_-infty^infty P_n(x) dx = pi$$



And that for any $delta > 0$:



$$lim_ntoinfty int_delta^infty P_n(x) dx = lim_ntoinfty int_-infty^-delta P_n(x) dx = 0$$



I've done that easily.



Now I need to prove that for $f:mathbbRtomathbbC$ which is $2pi$ periodic and continuous and:
$$f_n(x) = frac1pi int_-infty^infty f(x-t)P_n(t) dt$$



$f_nto f$, uniformly on $mathbbR$.



We learned in class about convolution and about Dirichlet/Fejer kernels.
Also, we learned that the trigonometric polynomials, $e^inx_ninmathbbZ$ are a dense set on $C(mathbbT)$ and the density is uniform. Meaning, there's a $P_n(x)=sum c_n e^inx$ converges uniformly to $f$ where $fin C(mathbbT)$.



note: $fin C(mathbbT)$ is a continuous and $2pi$ periodic function (T is for Torus).










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$
















    8












    $begingroup$


    Let $$P_n(x) = fracn1+n^2x^2$$.



    First, I had to prove that



    $$int_-infty^infty P_n(x) dx = pi$$



    And that for any $delta > 0$:



    $$lim_ntoinfty int_delta^infty P_n(x) dx = lim_ntoinfty int_-infty^-delta P_n(x) dx = 0$$



    I've done that easily.



    Now I need to prove that for $f:mathbbRtomathbbC$ which is $2pi$ periodic and continuous and:
    $$f_n(x) = frac1pi int_-infty^infty f(x-t)P_n(t) dt$$



    $f_nto f$, uniformly on $mathbbR$.



    We learned in class about convolution and about Dirichlet/Fejer kernels.
    Also, we learned that the trigonometric polynomials, $e^inx_ninmathbbZ$ are a dense set on $C(mathbbT)$ and the density is uniform. Meaning, there's a $P_n(x)=sum c_n e^inx$ converges uniformly to $f$ where $fin C(mathbbT)$.



    note: $fin C(mathbbT)$ is a continuous and $2pi$ periodic function (T is for Torus).










    share|cite|improve this question











    $endgroup$














      8












      8








      8


      5



      $begingroup$


      Let $$P_n(x) = fracn1+n^2x^2$$.



      First, I had to prove that



      $$int_-infty^infty P_n(x) dx = pi$$



      And that for any $delta > 0$:



      $$lim_ntoinfty int_delta^infty P_n(x) dx = lim_ntoinfty int_-infty^-delta P_n(x) dx = 0$$



      I've done that easily.



      Now I need to prove that for $f:mathbbRtomathbbC$ which is $2pi$ periodic and continuous and:
      $$f_n(x) = frac1pi int_-infty^infty f(x-t)P_n(t) dt$$



      $f_nto f$, uniformly on $mathbbR$.



      We learned in class about convolution and about Dirichlet/Fejer kernels.
      Also, we learned that the trigonometric polynomials, $e^inx_ninmathbbZ$ are a dense set on $C(mathbbT)$ and the density is uniform. Meaning, there's a $P_n(x)=sum c_n e^inx$ converges uniformly to $f$ where $fin C(mathbbT)$.



      note: $fin C(mathbbT)$ is a continuous and $2pi$ periodic function (T is for Torus).










      share|cite|improve this question











      $endgroup$




      Let $$P_n(x) = fracn1+n^2x^2$$.



      First, I had to prove that



      $$int_-infty^infty P_n(x) dx = pi$$



      And that for any $delta > 0$:



      $$lim_ntoinfty int_delta^infty P_n(x) dx = lim_ntoinfty int_-infty^-delta P_n(x) dx = 0$$



      I've done that easily.



      Now I need to prove that for $f:mathbbRtomathbbC$ which is $2pi$ periodic and continuous and:
      $$f_n(x) = frac1pi int_-infty^infty f(x-t)P_n(t) dt$$



      $f_nto f$, uniformly on $mathbbR$.



      We learned in class about convolution and about Dirichlet/Fejer kernels.
      Also, we learned that the trigonometric polynomials, $e^inx_ninmathbbZ$ are a dense set on $C(mathbbT)$ and the density is uniform. Meaning, there's a $P_n(x)=sum c_n e^inx$ converges uniformly to $f$ where $fin C(mathbbT)$.



      note: $fin C(mathbbT)$ is a continuous and $2pi$ periodic function (T is for Torus).







      calculus integration fourier-analysis fourier-series






      share|cite|improve this question















      share|cite|improve this question













      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question








      edited Jan 23 '16 at 14:02







      Elimination

















      asked Jan 23 '16 at 13:54









      EliminationElimination

      1,414923




      1,414923




















          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          6












          $begingroup$

          To get you started: $$| f_n(x) - f(x)| =left| (1/pi) int_-infty^infty f(x-t) P_n(t) ; dt - f(x)right| = (1/pi)left| int_-infty^inftyleft[f(x-t)- f(x)right] P_n(t) ; dt right|$$



          Now because $f$ is continuous on $mathbbT$ and $2pi$-periodic, we can essentially deduce its properties by considering its restriction $f_r$ to $[0,4pi]$. As a continuous function on a compact interval, $f_r$ is bounded and uniformly continuous. It's not hard to see that these properties carry over to $f$, meaning that $f$ is bounded and uniformly continous on $mathbbR$. This implies that for every $epsilon > 0$, there is a $delta
          > 0$
          such that
          $$|f(x) - f(x-t)| < epsilon quad forall t in (-delta,delta)forall xin mathbbR$$
          Now, given an $epsilon > 0$, we can choose $delta$ accordingly and then split up the integrals giving



          $$|f_n(x) - f(x)| leq (1/pi)left[int_-infty^-deltaCcdot P_n(t) ; dt + int_-delta^deltaepsiloncdot P_n(t) ; dt + int_delta^inftyCcdot P_n(t) ; dtright]$$



          Because of what you've already shown we know the left and right integral converge to $0$ as $n to infty$. But the middle integral can be estimated by $epsilon$, which concludes the proof.






          share|cite|improve this answer











          $endgroup$












          • $begingroup$
            Thank you @user159517. I'm trying to think how to utilize the $f(x-t)-f(x)$ expression but can't think of anything good. Could you help me proceed please? I guess I should rely on what I already found about the integral of $P_n(x)$ but the $f(x-t)-f(x)$ expression is "interfering"
            $endgroup$
            – Elimination
            Jan 23 '16 at 14:31











          • $begingroup$
            I edited my answer to include a little more information. If you still dont see what I'm getting at, I can make a full answer out of it.
            $endgroup$
            – user159517
            Jan 23 '16 at 14:40










          • $begingroup$
            @user159517 I'm sorry but how did you move the $f(x)$ into the integral? On the first line the function is not being integrated, but then on the second line it is?
            $endgroup$
            – TomGrubb
            Jan 23 '16 at 14:50






          • 1




            $begingroup$
            @bburGsamohT note that $f(x)$ does not depend on the integration variable $t$. So because of $int_-infty^infty P_n(t) dt = pi$, we have $(1/pi)int_-infty^inftyf(x) P_n(t) dt = f(x)$
            $endgroup$
            – user159517
            Jan 23 '16 at 14:54







          • 2




            $begingroup$
            @Elimination no, it's the same $delta$. The left and right integral converge to $0$ no matter what $delta$ we choose, so we can take it to be the $delta$ from the uniform continuity.
            $endgroup$
            – user159517
            Jan 23 '16 at 20:01











          Your Answer





          StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
          return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
          StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
          StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
          );
          );
          , "mathjax-editing");

          StackExchange.ready(function()
          var channelOptions =
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "69"
          ;
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
          createEditor();
          );

          else
          createEditor();

          );

          function createEditor()
          StackExchange.prepareEditor(
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
          convertImagesToLinks: true,
          noModals: true,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: 10,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          imageUploader:
          brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
          contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
          allowUrls: true
          ,
          noCode: true, onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          );



          );













          draft saved

          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function ()
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f1623527%2fshow-that-f-n-to-f-uniformly-on-mathbbr%23new-answer', 'question_page');

          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown

























          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes








          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes









          6












          $begingroup$

          To get you started: $$| f_n(x) - f(x)| =left| (1/pi) int_-infty^infty f(x-t) P_n(t) ; dt - f(x)right| = (1/pi)left| int_-infty^inftyleft[f(x-t)- f(x)right] P_n(t) ; dt right|$$



          Now because $f$ is continuous on $mathbbT$ and $2pi$-periodic, we can essentially deduce its properties by considering its restriction $f_r$ to $[0,4pi]$. As a continuous function on a compact interval, $f_r$ is bounded and uniformly continuous. It's not hard to see that these properties carry over to $f$, meaning that $f$ is bounded and uniformly continous on $mathbbR$. This implies that for every $epsilon > 0$, there is a $delta
          > 0$
          such that
          $$|f(x) - f(x-t)| < epsilon quad forall t in (-delta,delta)forall xin mathbbR$$
          Now, given an $epsilon > 0$, we can choose $delta$ accordingly and then split up the integrals giving



          $$|f_n(x) - f(x)| leq (1/pi)left[int_-infty^-deltaCcdot P_n(t) ; dt + int_-delta^deltaepsiloncdot P_n(t) ; dt + int_delta^inftyCcdot P_n(t) ; dtright]$$



          Because of what you've already shown we know the left and right integral converge to $0$ as $n to infty$. But the middle integral can be estimated by $epsilon$, which concludes the proof.






          share|cite|improve this answer











          $endgroup$












          • $begingroup$
            Thank you @user159517. I'm trying to think how to utilize the $f(x-t)-f(x)$ expression but can't think of anything good. Could you help me proceed please? I guess I should rely on what I already found about the integral of $P_n(x)$ but the $f(x-t)-f(x)$ expression is "interfering"
            $endgroup$
            – Elimination
            Jan 23 '16 at 14:31











          • $begingroup$
            I edited my answer to include a little more information. If you still dont see what I'm getting at, I can make a full answer out of it.
            $endgroup$
            – user159517
            Jan 23 '16 at 14:40










          • $begingroup$
            @user159517 I'm sorry but how did you move the $f(x)$ into the integral? On the first line the function is not being integrated, but then on the second line it is?
            $endgroup$
            – TomGrubb
            Jan 23 '16 at 14:50






          • 1




            $begingroup$
            @bburGsamohT note that $f(x)$ does not depend on the integration variable $t$. So because of $int_-infty^infty P_n(t) dt = pi$, we have $(1/pi)int_-infty^inftyf(x) P_n(t) dt = f(x)$
            $endgroup$
            – user159517
            Jan 23 '16 at 14:54







          • 2




            $begingroup$
            @Elimination no, it's the same $delta$. The left and right integral converge to $0$ no matter what $delta$ we choose, so we can take it to be the $delta$ from the uniform continuity.
            $endgroup$
            – user159517
            Jan 23 '16 at 20:01
















          6












          $begingroup$

          To get you started: $$| f_n(x) - f(x)| =left| (1/pi) int_-infty^infty f(x-t) P_n(t) ; dt - f(x)right| = (1/pi)left| int_-infty^inftyleft[f(x-t)- f(x)right] P_n(t) ; dt right|$$



          Now because $f$ is continuous on $mathbbT$ and $2pi$-periodic, we can essentially deduce its properties by considering its restriction $f_r$ to $[0,4pi]$. As a continuous function on a compact interval, $f_r$ is bounded and uniformly continuous. It's not hard to see that these properties carry over to $f$, meaning that $f$ is bounded and uniformly continous on $mathbbR$. This implies that for every $epsilon > 0$, there is a $delta
          > 0$
          such that
          $$|f(x) - f(x-t)| < epsilon quad forall t in (-delta,delta)forall xin mathbbR$$
          Now, given an $epsilon > 0$, we can choose $delta$ accordingly and then split up the integrals giving



          $$|f_n(x) - f(x)| leq (1/pi)left[int_-infty^-deltaCcdot P_n(t) ; dt + int_-delta^deltaepsiloncdot P_n(t) ; dt + int_delta^inftyCcdot P_n(t) ; dtright]$$



          Because of what you've already shown we know the left and right integral converge to $0$ as $n to infty$. But the middle integral can be estimated by $epsilon$, which concludes the proof.






          share|cite|improve this answer











          $endgroup$












          • $begingroup$
            Thank you @user159517. I'm trying to think how to utilize the $f(x-t)-f(x)$ expression but can't think of anything good. Could you help me proceed please? I guess I should rely on what I already found about the integral of $P_n(x)$ but the $f(x-t)-f(x)$ expression is "interfering"
            $endgroup$
            – Elimination
            Jan 23 '16 at 14:31











          • $begingroup$
            I edited my answer to include a little more information. If you still dont see what I'm getting at, I can make a full answer out of it.
            $endgroup$
            – user159517
            Jan 23 '16 at 14:40










          • $begingroup$
            @user159517 I'm sorry but how did you move the $f(x)$ into the integral? On the first line the function is not being integrated, but then on the second line it is?
            $endgroup$
            – TomGrubb
            Jan 23 '16 at 14:50






          • 1




            $begingroup$
            @bburGsamohT note that $f(x)$ does not depend on the integration variable $t$. So because of $int_-infty^infty P_n(t) dt = pi$, we have $(1/pi)int_-infty^inftyf(x) P_n(t) dt = f(x)$
            $endgroup$
            – user159517
            Jan 23 '16 at 14:54







          • 2




            $begingroup$
            @Elimination no, it's the same $delta$. The left and right integral converge to $0$ no matter what $delta$ we choose, so we can take it to be the $delta$ from the uniform continuity.
            $endgroup$
            – user159517
            Jan 23 '16 at 20:01














          6












          6








          6





          $begingroup$

          To get you started: $$| f_n(x) - f(x)| =left| (1/pi) int_-infty^infty f(x-t) P_n(t) ; dt - f(x)right| = (1/pi)left| int_-infty^inftyleft[f(x-t)- f(x)right] P_n(t) ; dt right|$$



          Now because $f$ is continuous on $mathbbT$ and $2pi$-periodic, we can essentially deduce its properties by considering its restriction $f_r$ to $[0,4pi]$. As a continuous function on a compact interval, $f_r$ is bounded and uniformly continuous. It's not hard to see that these properties carry over to $f$, meaning that $f$ is bounded and uniformly continous on $mathbbR$. This implies that for every $epsilon > 0$, there is a $delta
          > 0$
          such that
          $$|f(x) - f(x-t)| < epsilon quad forall t in (-delta,delta)forall xin mathbbR$$
          Now, given an $epsilon > 0$, we can choose $delta$ accordingly and then split up the integrals giving



          $$|f_n(x) - f(x)| leq (1/pi)left[int_-infty^-deltaCcdot P_n(t) ; dt + int_-delta^deltaepsiloncdot P_n(t) ; dt + int_delta^inftyCcdot P_n(t) ; dtright]$$



          Because of what you've already shown we know the left and right integral converge to $0$ as $n to infty$. But the middle integral can be estimated by $epsilon$, which concludes the proof.






          share|cite|improve this answer











          $endgroup$



          To get you started: $$| f_n(x) - f(x)| =left| (1/pi) int_-infty^infty f(x-t) P_n(t) ; dt - f(x)right| = (1/pi)left| int_-infty^inftyleft[f(x-t)- f(x)right] P_n(t) ; dt right|$$



          Now because $f$ is continuous on $mathbbT$ and $2pi$-periodic, we can essentially deduce its properties by considering its restriction $f_r$ to $[0,4pi]$. As a continuous function on a compact interval, $f_r$ is bounded and uniformly continuous. It's not hard to see that these properties carry over to $f$, meaning that $f$ is bounded and uniformly continous on $mathbbR$. This implies that for every $epsilon > 0$, there is a $delta
          > 0$
          such that
          $$|f(x) - f(x-t)| < epsilon quad forall t in (-delta,delta)forall xin mathbbR$$
          Now, given an $epsilon > 0$, we can choose $delta$ accordingly and then split up the integrals giving



          $$|f_n(x) - f(x)| leq (1/pi)left[int_-infty^-deltaCcdot P_n(t) ; dt + int_-delta^deltaepsiloncdot P_n(t) ; dt + int_delta^inftyCcdot P_n(t) ; dtright]$$



          Because of what you've already shown we know the left and right integral converge to $0$ as $n to infty$. But the middle integral can be estimated by $epsilon$, which concludes the proof.







          share|cite|improve this answer














          share|cite|improve this answer



          share|cite|improve this answer








          edited yesterday

























          answered Jan 23 '16 at 14:08









          user159517user159517

          4,495931




          4,495931











          • $begingroup$
            Thank you @user159517. I'm trying to think how to utilize the $f(x-t)-f(x)$ expression but can't think of anything good. Could you help me proceed please? I guess I should rely on what I already found about the integral of $P_n(x)$ but the $f(x-t)-f(x)$ expression is "interfering"
            $endgroup$
            – Elimination
            Jan 23 '16 at 14:31











          • $begingroup$
            I edited my answer to include a little more information. If you still dont see what I'm getting at, I can make a full answer out of it.
            $endgroup$
            – user159517
            Jan 23 '16 at 14:40










          • $begingroup$
            @user159517 I'm sorry but how did you move the $f(x)$ into the integral? On the first line the function is not being integrated, but then on the second line it is?
            $endgroup$
            – TomGrubb
            Jan 23 '16 at 14:50






          • 1




            $begingroup$
            @bburGsamohT note that $f(x)$ does not depend on the integration variable $t$. So because of $int_-infty^infty P_n(t) dt = pi$, we have $(1/pi)int_-infty^inftyf(x) P_n(t) dt = f(x)$
            $endgroup$
            – user159517
            Jan 23 '16 at 14:54







          • 2




            $begingroup$
            @Elimination no, it's the same $delta$. The left and right integral converge to $0$ no matter what $delta$ we choose, so we can take it to be the $delta$ from the uniform continuity.
            $endgroup$
            – user159517
            Jan 23 '16 at 20:01

















          • $begingroup$
            Thank you @user159517. I'm trying to think how to utilize the $f(x-t)-f(x)$ expression but can't think of anything good. Could you help me proceed please? I guess I should rely on what I already found about the integral of $P_n(x)$ but the $f(x-t)-f(x)$ expression is "interfering"
            $endgroup$
            – Elimination
            Jan 23 '16 at 14:31











          • $begingroup$
            I edited my answer to include a little more information. If you still dont see what I'm getting at, I can make a full answer out of it.
            $endgroup$
            – user159517
            Jan 23 '16 at 14:40










          • $begingroup$
            @user159517 I'm sorry but how did you move the $f(x)$ into the integral? On the first line the function is not being integrated, but then on the second line it is?
            $endgroup$
            – TomGrubb
            Jan 23 '16 at 14:50






          • 1




            $begingroup$
            @bburGsamohT note that $f(x)$ does not depend on the integration variable $t$. So because of $int_-infty^infty P_n(t) dt = pi$, we have $(1/pi)int_-infty^inftyf(x) P_n(t) dt = f(x)$
            $endgroup$
            – user159517
            Jan 23 '16 at 14:54







          • 2




            $begingroup$
            @Elimination no, it's the same $delta$. The left and right integral converge to $0$ no matter what $delta$ we choose, so we can take it to be the $delta$ from the uniform continuity.
            $endgroup$
            – user159517
            Jan 23 '16 at 20:01
















          $begingroup$
          Thank you @user159517. I'm trying to think how to utilize the $f(x-t)-f(x)$ expression but can't think of anything good. Could you help me proceed please? I guess I should rely on what I already found about the integral of $P_n(x)$ but the $f(x-t)-f(x)$ expression is "interfering"
          $endgroup$
          – Elimination
          Jan 23 '16 at 14:31





          $begingroup$
          Thank you @user159517. I'm trying to think how to utilize the $f(x-t)-f(x)$ expression but can't think of anything good. Could you help me proceed please? I guess I should rely on what I already found about the integral of $P_n(x)$ but the $f(x-t)-f(x)$ expression is "interfering"
          $endgroup$
          – Elimination
          Jan 23 '16 at 14:31













          $begingroup$
          I edited my answer to include a little more information. If you still dont see what I'm getting at, I can make a full answer out of it.
          $endgroup$
          – user159517
          Jan 23 '16 at 14:40




          $begingroup$
          I edited my answer to include a little more information. If you still dont see what I'm getting at, I can make a full answer out of it.
          $endgroup$
          – user159517
          Jan 23 '16 at 14:40












          $begingroup$
          @user159517 I'm sorry but how did you move the $f(x)$ into the integral? On the first line the function is not being integrated, but then on the second line it is?
          $endgroup$
          – TomGrubb
          Jan 23 '16 at 14:50




          $begingroup$
          @user159517 I'm sorry but how did you move the $f(x)$ into the integral? On the first line the function is not being integrated, but then on the second line it is?
          $endgroup$
          – TomGrubb
          Jan 23 '16 at 14:50




          1




          1




          $begingroup$
          @bburGsamohT note that $f(x)$ does not depend on the integration variable $t$. So because of $int_-infty^infty P_n(t) dt = pi$, we have $(1/pi)int_-infty^inftyf(x) P_n(t) dt = f(x)$
          $endgroup$
          – user159517
          Jan 23 '16 at 14:54





          $begingroup$
          @bburGsamohT note that $f(x)$ does not depend on the integration variable $t$. So because of $int_-infty^infty P_n(t) dt = pi$, we have $(1/pi)int_-infty^inftyf(x) P_n(t) dt = f(x)$
          $endgroup$
          – user159517
          Jan 23 '16 at 14:54





          2




          2




          $begingroup$
          @Elimination no, it's the same $delta$. The left and right integral converge to $0$ no matter what $delta$ we choose, so we can take it to be the $delta$ from the uniform continuity.
          $endgroup$
          – user159517
          Jan 23 '16 at 20:01





          $begingroup$
          @Elimination no, it's the same $delta$. The left and right integral converge to $0$ no matter what $delta$ we choose, so we can take it to be the $delta$ from the uniform continuity.
          $endgroup$
          – user159517
          Jan 23 '16 at 20:01


















          draft saved

          draft discarded
















































          Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

          But avoid


          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

          Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




          draft saved


          draft discarded














          StackExchange.ready(
          function ()
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f1623527%2fshow-that-f-n-to-f-uniformly-on-mathbbr%23new-answer', 'question_page');

          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown





















































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown

































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown







          7ntiKrmsN6
          wl 5WBnp,MLivDCHMVaDhf,VfWb5HGfc3d YC3D5u4I9,5,1GQlbS02X WznPoKIqFlmHdua,lFDqELjqitIai

          Popular posts from this blog

          Football at the 1986 Brunei Merdeka Games Contents Teams Group stage Knockout stage References Navigation menu"Brunei Merdeka Games 1986".

          Solar Wings Breeze Design and development Specifications (Breeze) References Navigation menu1368-485X"Hang glider: Breeze (Solar Wings)"e

          Kathakali Contents Etymology and nomenclature History Repertoire Songs and musical instruments Traditional plays Styles: Sampradayam Training centers and awards Relationship to other dance forms See also Notes References External links Navigation menueThe Illustrated Encyclopedia of Hinduism: A-MSouth Asian Folklore: An EncyclopediaRoutledge International Encyclopedia of Women: Global Women's Issues and KnowledgeKathakali Dance-drama: Where Gods and Demons Come to PlayKathakali Dance-drama: Where Gods and Demons Come to PlayKathakali Dance-drama: Where Gods and Demons Come to Play10.1353/atj.2005.0004The Illustrated Encyclopedia of Hinduism: A-MEncyclopedia of HinduismKathakali Dance-drama: Where Gods and Demons Come to PlaySonic Liturgy: Ritual and Music in Hindu Tradition"The Mirror of Gesture"Kathakali Dance-drama: Where Gods and Demons Come to Play"Kathakali"Indian Theatre: Traditions of PerformanceIndian Theatre: Traditions of PerformanceIndian Theatre: Traditions of PerformanceIndian Theatre: Traditions of PerformanceMedieval Indian Literature: An AnthologyThe Oxford Companion to Indian TheatreSouth Asian Folklore: An Encyclopedia : Afghanistan, Bangladesh, India, Nepal, Pakistan, Sri LankaThe Rise of Performance Studies: Rethinking Richard Schechner's Broad SpectrumIndian Theatre: Traditions of PerformanceModern Asian Theatre and Performance 1900-2000Critical Theory and PerformanceBetween Theater and AnthropologyKathakali603847011Indian Theatre: Traditions of PerformanceIndian Theatre: Traditions of PerformanceIndian Theatre: Traditions of PerformanceBetween Theater and AnthropologyBetween Theater and AnthropologyNambeesan Smaraka AwardsArchivedThe Cambridge Guide to TheatreRoutledge International Encyclopedia of Women: Global Women's Issues and KnowledgeThe Garland Encyclopedia of World Music: South Asia : the Indian subcontinentThe Ethos of Noh: Actors and Their Art10.2307/1145740By Means of Performance: Intercultural Studies of Theatre and Ritual10.1017/s204912550000100xReconceiving the Renaissance: A Critical ReaderPerformance TheoryListening to Theatre: The Aural Dimension of Beijing Opera10.2307/1146013Kathakali: The Art of the Non-WorldlyOn KathakaliKathakali, the dance theatreThe Kathakali Complex: Performance & StructureKathakali Dance-Drama: Where Gods and Demons Come to Play10.1093/obo/9780195399318-0071Drama and Ritual of Early Hinduism"In the Shadow of Hollywood Orientalism: Authentic East Indian Dancing"10.1080/08949460490274013Sanskrit Play Production in Ancient IndiaIndian Music: History and StructureBharata, the Nāṭyaśāstra233639306Table of Contents2238067286469807Dance In Indian Painting10.2307/32047833204783Kathakali Dance-Theatre: A Visual Narrative of Sacred Indian MimeIndian Classical Dance: The Renaissance and BeyondKathakali: an indigenous art-form of Keralaeee