Fdtxjr

In the late 1940’s to early 1950’s what technology was available that could melt a LOT of ice?

Specifying a starting column with colortbl package and xcolor

Was it really inappropriate to write a pull request for the company I interviewed with?

How to resolve: Reviewer #1 says remove section X vs. Reviewer #2 says expand section X

Expressing logarithmic equations without logs

How can I manipulate the output of Information?

Crossing a border with an infant of a different citizenship

Why couldn't the separatists legally leave the Republic?

Plausibility of Mushroom Buildings

Confusion about Complex Continued Fraction

Why does Central Limit Theorem break down in my simulation?

What do *foreign films* mean for an American?

What's the 'present simple' form of the word "нашла́" in 3rd person singular female?

What stops an assembly program from crashing the operating system?

Called into a meeting and told we are being made redundant (laid off) and "not to share outside". Can I tell my partner?

From an axiomatic set theoric approach why can we take uncountable unions?

Drawing close together horizontal lines in Latex

Why is there an extra space when I type "ls" in the Desktop directory?

Do items de-spawn?

Can I negotiate a patent idea for a raise, under French law?

Signed and unsigned numbers

Conservation of Mass and Energy

Giving a career talk in my old university, how prominently should I tell students my salary?

Recommendation letter by significant other if you worked with them professionally?

Proof or counterexample for isomorphism of group representations

Reference request: Indecomposable representations of posetsUnitary representations of locally compact topological groupsUnitary G-module*-representations, unitary representations, and adjunctionsReducibility of unitary representationsBasis of $SO(n)$-representationsVariational criterion for commuting tori in a compact Lie groupDoes $pi otimes overlinepi$ contain weakly the identity representation $1_G$?Mistake in the proof of Theorem 2.24 of Quiver Representations by Ralf Schiffler?What happens if the trivial representation is the only irreducible representation?

1

$begingroup$

Let $(pi , V_pi)$ be an irreducible unitary representation of the (locally compact) group $G$. Let $V_pi^n = V_pi oplus ldots oplus V_pi$ be the $n$-fold direct sum of $V_pi$ on which we have the (unitary) representation $pi^n$ where $$pi^n(g) big(v_1 , ldots , v_n big) := big(pi(g) v_1 , ldots , pi(g) v_n big) .$$
I strongly suspect, that for fixed $v in V_pi^n$ with $v_1 neq 0$ the map $$operatornamePr colon V_pi^n to V_pi colon (v_1 , ldots , v_n ) longmapsto v_1$$is a $G$-intertwining isomorphism bewtween$$left( pi^n , overlinelangle pi(g) v ~ : g in G rangle right) longleftrightarrow big( pi , V_pi big) .$$
The $G$-intertwining property as well as surjectivity are clear but I'm having trouble showing injectivity. I'm grateful for any hints as well as for a counterexample, if there is one. If this makes it any easier, the solution to that problem would be sufficient for the case $G = operatornameSL_2 big(mathbbRbig)$.

representation-theory lie-groups vector-space-isomorphism

share|cite|improve this question

asked yesterday

TargonTargon

535

$endgroup$

add a comment | 

1

$begingroup$

Let $(pi , V_pi)$ be an irreducible unitary representation of the (locally compact) group $G$. Let $V_pi^n = V_pi oplus ldots oplus V_pi$ be the $n$-fold direct sum of $V_pi$ on which we have the (unitary) representation $pi^n$ where $$pi^n(g) big(v_1 , ldots , v_n big) := big(pi(g) v_1 , ldots , pi(g) v_n big) .$$
I strongly suspect, that for fixed $v in V_pi^n$ with $v_1 neq 0$ the map $$operatornamePr colon V_pi^n to V_pi colon (v_1 , ldots , v_n ) longmapsto v_1$$is a $G$-intertwining isomorphism bewtween$$left( pi^n , overlinelangle pi(g) v ~ : g in G rangle right) longleftrightarrow big( pi , V_pi big) .$$
The $G$-intertwining property as well as surjectivity are clear but I'm having trouble showing injectivity. I'm grateful for any hints as well as for a counterexample, if there is one. If this makes it any easier, the solution to that problem would be sufficient for the case $G = operatornameSL_2 big(mathbbRbig)$.

representation-theory lie-groups vector-space-isomorphism

share|cite|improve this question

asked yesterday

TargonTargon

535

$endgroup$

add a comment | 

$begingroup$

Let $(pi , V_pi)$ be an irreducible unitary representation of the (locally compact) group $G$. Let $V_pi^n = V_pi oplus ldots oplus V_pi$ be the $n$-fold direct sum of $V_pi$ on which we have the (unitary) representation $pi^n$ where $$pi^n(g) big(v_1 , ldots , v_n big) := big(pi(g) v_1 , ldots , pi(g) v_n big) .$$
I strongly suspect, that for fixed $v in V_pi^n$ with $v_1 neq 0$ the map $$operatornamePr colon V_pi^n to V_pi colon (v_1 , ldots , v_n ) longmapsto v_1$$is a $G$-intertwining isomorphism bewtween$$left( pi^n , overlinelangle pi(g) v ~ : g in G rangle right) longleftrightarrow big( pi , V_pi big) .$$
The $G$-intertwining property as well as surjectivity are clear but I'm having trouble showing injectivity. I'm grateful for any hints as well as for a counterexample, if there is one. If this makes it any easier, the solution to that problem would be sufficient for the case $G = operatornameSL_2 big(mathbbRbig)$.

representation-theory lie-groups vector-space-isomorphism

share|cite|improve this question

asked yesterday

TargonTargon

535

$endgroup$

share|cite|improve this question

asked yesterday

TargonTargon

535

share|cite|improve this question

asked yesterday

TargonTargon

535

asked yesterday

TargonTargon

535

asked yesterday

TargonTargon

535

1 Answer
1

active

oldest

votes

0

$begingroup$

It's not true in general, even for finite dimensional representations of finite groups.

Take for instance $mathfrakS_3$ acting on $mathbbR^3$, take the irreducible subrepresentation $V=mathbfxin mathbbR^3 mid sum x_i = 0$.

Then take $v =(v_1,v_2) in Voplus V$ with $v_1 = (1,1,-2)$, $v_2 = (1,2,-3)$.

Then with $sigma = (1 2)$ you have $sigma v - v$ which is sent to $sigma v_1 - v_1=0$ but $sigma v - v = (sigma v_1 - v_1, sigma v_2 - v_2) = (0, (1,-1,0))neq 0$

(To construct the counterexample I thought of the easiest way for $displaystylesum_g lambda_g gv_1 = 0$ but $displaystylesum_g lambda_g g$ not $0$ on $V$, then it suffices to find $v_2$ not in the kernel; for this I looked for examples of $g-1$ not being $0$ (that is, $g$ is not in the kernel of the representation), but having a zero (that is, $g$ having a fixed point) - this led me to my example)

share|cite|improve this answer

answered yesterday

MaxMax

15.1k11143

$endgroup$

add a comment | 

Your Answer

StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
);
);
, "mathjax-editing");

StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);

else
createEditor();

);

function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);



);

draft saved

draft discarded

Sign up or log in

StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);

Sign up using Google

Sign up using Facebook

Sign up using Email and Password

Post as a guest

Name

Email

Required, but never shown

StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3141072%2fproof-or-counterexample-for-isomorphism-of-group-representations%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest

Name

Email

Required, but never shown

0

$begingroup$

It's not true in general, even for finite dimensional representations of finite groups.

Take for instance $mathfrakS_3$ acting on $mathbbR^3$, take the irreducible subrepresentation $V=mathbfxin mathbbR^3 mid sum x_i = 0$.

Then take $v =(v_1,v_2) in Voplus V$ with $v_1 = (1,1,-2)$, $v_2 = (1,2,-3)$.

Then with $sigma = (1 2)$ you have $sigma v - v$ which is sent to $sigma v_1 - v_1=0$ but $sigma v - v = (sigma v_1 - v_1, sigma v_2 - v_2) = (0, (1,-1,0))neq 0$

(To construct the counterexample I thought of the easiest way for $displaystylesum_g lambda_g gv_1 = 0$ but $displaystylesum_g lambda_g g$ not $0$ on $V$, then it suffices to find $v_2$ not in the kernel; for this I looked for examples of $g-1$ not being $0$ (that is, $g$ is not in the kernel of the representation), but having a zero (that is, $g$ having a fixed point) - this led me to my example)

share|cite|improve this answer

answered yesterday

MaxMax

15.1k11143

$endgroup$

add a comment | 

0

$begingroup$

It's not true in general, even for finite dimensional representations of finite groups.

Take for instance $mathfrakS_3$ acting on $mathbbR^3$, take the irreducible subrepresentation $V=mathbfxin mathbbR^3 mid sum x_i = 0$.

Then take $v =(v_1,v_2) in Voplus V$ with $v_1 = (1,1,-2)$, $v_2 = (1,2,-3)$.

Then with $sigma = (1 2)$ you have $sigma v - v$ which is sent to $sigma v_1 - v_1=0$ but $sigma v - v = (sigma v_1 - v_1, sigma v_2 - v_2) = (0, (1,-1,0))neq 0$

(To construct the counterexample I thought of the easiest way for $displaystylesum_g lambda_g gv_1 = 0$ but $displaystylesum_g lambda_g g$ not $0$ on $V$, then it suffices to find $v_2$ not in the kernel; for this I looked for examples of $g-1$ not being $0$ (that is, $g$ is not in the kernel of the representation), but having a zero (that is, $g$ having a fixed point) - this led me to my example)

share|cite|improve this answer

answered yesterday

MaxMax

15.1k11143

$endgroup$

add a comment | 

$begingroup$

It's not true in general, even for finite dimensional representations of finite groups.

Take for instance $mathfrakS_3$ acting on $mathbbR^3$, take the irreducible subrepresentation $V=mathbfxin mathbbR^3 mid sum x_i = 0$.

Then take $v =(v_1,v_2) in Voplus V$ with $v_1 = (1,1,-2)$, $v_2 = (1,2,-3)$.

Then with $sigma = (1 2)$ you have $sigma v - v$ which is sent to $sigma v_1 - v_1=0$ but $sigma v - v = (sigma v_1 - v_1, sigma v_2 - v_2) = (0, (1,-1,0))neq 0$

(To construct the counterexample I thought of the easiest way for $displaystylesum_g lambda_g gv_1 = 0$ but $displaystylesum_g lambda_g g$ not $0$ on $V$, then it suffices to find $v_2$ not in the kernel; for this I looked for examples of $g-1$ not being $0$ (that is, $g$ is not in the kernel of the representation), but having a zero (that is, $g$ having a fixed point) - this led me to my example)

share|cite|improve this answer

answered yesterday

MaxMax

15.1k11143

$endgroup$

share|cite|improve this answer

answered yesterday

MaxMax

15.1k11143

answered yesterday

MaxMax

15.1k11143

answered yesterday

MaxMax

15.1k11143