Generating correlated normal vectors with observationsWhat is the correlation function in multivariable/vectoral case?Random point distribtionCorrelation Coefficient Distribution Function: An Apparent Discrepancy?Whether or not $X_1$,…,$X_n$ are independent and exchangeableAnalytical form of a joint PDF of two uniformly distributed random variableswhat do these odds ratios represent?Affine transformation does not preserve normal vectorsLinear transformation of random variable to get correlation 0Use Pearson Correlation to Assess Nonlinear Association?Conditional density in hierarchical model

From an axiomatic set theoric approach why can we take uncountable unions?

Why do we say ‘pairwise disjoint’, rather than ‘disjoint’?

The meaning of ‘otherwise’

How do we create new idioms and use them in a novel?

Can I negotiate a patent idea for a raise, under French law?

What will happen if my luggage gets delayed?

Having the player face themselves after the mid-game

What is this diamond of every day?

Professor forcing me to attend a conference, I can't afford even with 50% funding

Are all players supposed to be able to see each others' character sheets?

Shifting between bemols and diesis in the key signature

What is better: yes / no radio, or simple checkbox?

Rationale to prefer local variables over instance variables?

Outlet with 3 sets of wires

Can the alpha, lambda values of a glmnet object output determine whether ridge or Lasso?

What do you call someone who likes to pick fights?

Which situations would cause a company to ground or recall a aircraft series?

Making a kiddush for a girl that has hard time finding shidduch

Finitely many repeated replacements

How to resolve: Reviewer #1 says remove section X vs. Reviewer #2 says expand section X

Dynamic Linkage of LocatorPane and InputField

How to write a chaotic neutral protagonist and prevent my readers from thinking they are evil?

Specifying a starting column with colortbl package and xcolor

After `ssh` without `-X` to a machine, is it possible to change `$DISPLAY` to make it work like `ssh -X`?



Generating correlated normal vectors with observations


What is the correlation function in multivariable/vectoral case?Random point distribtionCorrelation Coefficient Distribution Function: An Apparent Discrepancy?Whether or not $X_1$,…,$X_n$ are independent and exchangeableAnalytical form of a joint PDF of two uniformly distributed random variableswhat do these odds ratios represent?Affine transformation does not preserve normal vectorsLinear transformation of random variable to get correlation 0Use Pearson Correlation to Assess Nonlinear Association?Conditional density in hierarchical model













0












$begingroup$


Assume we are given two normally distributed random variables, $X_1$ and $X_2$, with $X_i sim mathcal N (0, sigma_x_i^2)$, with correlation coefficient $rho_x$. Assume further that we need to generate another two normally distributed random variables $Y_1$ and $Y_2$ with $Y_j sim mathcal N (0,sigma_y_j^2)$, with correlation coefficient $rho_y$ and cross correlation



$$rho_i,j =fracmathbbEX_i Y_jsigma_x_i sigma_y_i$$



I.e., we need to generate $[Y_1, Y_2]$ taken into consideration the given $[X_1, X_2]$. I know how to generate all of them together $[X_1,X_2, Y_1, Y_2]$ using covariance matrix



$$M_4times4 =
beginbmatrix
sigma_x_1^2 &rho_x sigma_x_1sigma_x_2 &rho_1,1sigma_x_1 sigma_y_1 &rho_1,2sigma_x_1sigma_y_2\
rho_x sigma_x_1sigma_x_2 &sigma_x_2^2 &rho_2,1sigma_x_2 sigma_y_1 & rho_2,2sigma_x_2 sigma_y_2\
rho_1,1 sigma_x_1 sigma_y_1 & rho_1,2 sigma_x_2 sigma_y_1 & sigma_y_1^2 & rho_ysigma_y_1sigma_y_2\
rho_1,2 sigma_x_1 sigma_y_2 & rho_2,2 sigma_x_2sigma_y_2 & rho_ysigma_y_1sigma_y_2 & sigma_y_2^2 \
endbmatrix = beginbmatrix A_2times2 & B_2times2 \ B^top_2times2 & C_2times2 \ endbmatrix $$



I think we can generate $[Y_1, Y_2]$ by conditioning on $[X_1, X_2]$ and calculate the new conditional covariance, $tildeC = beginbmatrix C - B^top A^-1B endbmatrix$. Assuming that $A,B$ and $C$ are positive semidefinite (PSD), but not $M$, is it still possible to generate $[Y_1,Y_2]$?! or are we going to get always a non-PSD $tildeC$.










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$
















    0












    $begingroup$


    Assume we are given two normally distributed random variables, $X_1$ and $X_2$, with $X_i sim mathcal N (0, sigma_x_i^2)$, with correlation coefficient $rho_x$. Assume further that we need to generate another two normally distributed random variables $Y_1$ and $Y_2$ with $Y_j sim mathcal N (0,sigma_y_j^2)$, with correlation coefficient $rho_y$ and cross correlation



    $$rho_i,j =fracmathbbEX_i Y_jsigma_x_i sigma_y_i$$



    I.e., we need to generate $[Y_1, Y_2]$ taken into consideration the given $[X_1, X_2]$. I know how to generate all of them together $[X_1,X_2, Y_1, Y_2]$ using covariance matrix



    $$M_4times4 =
    beginbmatrix
    sigma_x_1^2 &rho_x sigma_x_1sigma_x_2 &rho_1,1sigma_x_1 sigma_y_1 &rho_1,2sigma_x_1sigma_y_2\
    rho_x sigma_x_1sigma_x_2 &sigma_x_2^2 &rho_2,1sigma_x_2 sigma_y_1 & rho_2,2sigma_x_2 sigma_y_2\
    rho_1,1 sigma_x_1 sigma_y_1 & rho_1,2 sigma_x_2 sigma_y_1 & sigma_y_1^2 & rho_ysigma_y_1sigma_y_2\
    rho_1,2 sigma_x_1 sigma_y_2 & rho_2,2 sigma_x_2sigma_y_2 & rho_ysigma_y_1sigma_y_2 & sigma_y_2^2 \
    endbmatrix = beginbmatrix A_2times2 & B_2times2 \ B^top_2times2 & C_2times2 \ endbmatrix $$



    I think we can generate $[Y_1, Y_2]$ by conditioning on $[X_1, X_2]$ and calculate the new conditional covariance, $tildeC = beginbmatrix C - B^top A^-1B endbmatrix$. Assuming that $A,B$ and $C$ are positive semidefinite (PSD), but not $M$, is it still possible to generate $[Y_1,Y_2]$?! or are we going to get always a non-PSD $tildeC$.










    share|cite|improve this question











    $endgroup$














      0












      0








      0





      $begingroup$


      Assume we are given two normally distributed random variables, $X_1$ and $X_2$, with $X_i sim mathcal N (0, sigma_x_i^2)$, with correlation coefficient $rho_x$. Assume further that we need to generate another two normally distributed random variables $Y_1$ and $Y_2$ with $Y_j sim mathcal N (0,sigma_y_j^2)$, with correlation coefficient $rho_y$ and cross correlation



      $$rho_i,j =fracmathbbEX_i Y_jsigma_x_i sigma_y_i$$



      I.e., we need to generate $[Y_1, Y_2]$ taken into consideration the given $[X_1, X_2]$. I know how to generate all of them together $[X_1,X_2, Y_1, Y_2]$ using covariance matrix



      $$M_4times4 =
      beginbmatrix
      sigma_x_1^2 &rho_x sigma_x_1sigma_x_2 &rho_1,1sigma_x_1 sigma_y_1 &rho_1,2sigma_x_1sigma_y_2\
      rho_x sigma_x_1sigma_x_2 &sigma_x_2^2 &rho_2,1sigma_x_2 sigma_y_1 & rho_2,2sigma_x_2 sigma_y_2\
      rho_1,1 sigma_x_1 sigma_y_1 & rho_1,2 sigma_x_2 sigma_y_1 & sigma_y_1^2 & rho_ysigma_y_1sigma_y_2\
      rho_1,2 sigma_x_1 sigma_y_2 & rho_2,2 sigma_x_2sigma_y_2 & rho_ysigma_y_1sigma_y_2 & sigma_y_2^2 \
      endbmatrix = beginbmatrix A_2times2 & B_2times2 \ B^top_2times2 & C_2times2 \ endbmatrix $$



      I think we can generate $[Y_1, Y_2]$ by conditioning on $[X_1, X_2]$ and calculate the new conditional covariance, $tildeC = beginbmatrix C - B^top A^-1B endbmatrix$. Assuming that $A,B$ and $C$ are positive semidefinite (PSD), but not $M$, is it still possible to generate $[Y_1,Y_2]$?! or are we going to get always a non-PSD $tildeC$.










      share|cite|improve this question











      $endgroup$




      Assume we are given two normally distributed random variables, $X_1$ and $X_2$, with $X_i sim mathcal N (0, sigma_x_i^2)$, with correlation coefficient $rho_x$. Assume further that we need to generate another two normally distributed random variables $Y_1$ and $Y_2$ with $Y_j sim mathcal N (0,sigma_y_j^2)$, with correlation coefficient $rho_y$ and cross correlation



      $$rho_i,j =fracmathbbEX_i Y_jsigma_x_i sigma_y_i$$



      I.e., we need to generate $[Y_1, Y_2]$ taken into consideration the given $[X_1, X_2]$. I know how to generate all of them together $[X_1,X_2, Y_1, Y_2]$ using covariance matrix



      $$M_4times4 =
      beginbmatrix
      sigma_x_1^2 &rho_x sigma_x_1sigma_x_2 &rho_1,1sigma_x_1 sigma_y_1 &rho_1,2sigma_x_1sigma_y_2\
      rho_x sigma_x_1sigma_x_2 &sigma_x_2^2 &rho_2,1sigma_x_2 sigma_y_1 & rho_2,2sigma_x_2 sigma_y_2\
      rho_1,1 sigma_x_1 sigma_y_1 & rho_1,2 sigma_x_2 sigma_y_1 & sigma_y_1^2 & rho_ysigma_y_1sigma_y_2\
      rho_1,2 sigma_x_1 sigma_y_2 & rho_2,2 sigma_x_2sigma_y_2 & rho_ysigma_y_1sigma_y_2 & sigma_y_2^2 \
      endbmatrix = beginbmatrix A_2times2 & B_2times2 \ B^top_2times2 & C_2times2 \ endbmatrix $$



      I think we can generate $[Y_1, Y_2]$ by conditioning on $[X_1, X_2]$ and calculate the new conditional covariance, $tildeC = beginbmatrix C - B^top A^-1B endbmatrix$. Assuming that $A,B$ and $C$ are positive semidefinite (PSD), but not $M$, is it still possible to generate $[Y_1,Y_2]$?! or are we going to get always a non-PSD $tildeC$.







      statistics numerical-linear-algebra conditional-probability






      share|cite|improve this question















      share|cite|improve this question













      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question








      edited 19 hours ago







      MrX

















      asked yesterday









      MrXMrX

      302313




      302313




















          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          0












          $begingroup$

          You have a small typo: the conditional covariance is $C - B^top A^-1 B$.



          If you take for granted that the formula for conditional covariance is correct, then you know it must be PSD simply because it is a covariance matrix. (Similarly, you know $A$ and $C$ must be PSD since they are covariance matrices for $(X_1, X_2)$ and $(Y_1, Y_2)$).



          For general matrices that don't have any context as covariance matrices, you can refer to these results on the Schur complement.






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$












          • $begingroup$
            I corrected the typo, it is due to the fact I was initially using $sigma_x_i = sigma_x$, i.e.,$B$ would be symmetric.
            $endgroup$
            – MrX
            19 hours ago










          • $begingroup$
            But the core of my question boils down to the following: I think from the "if and only of" when $M$ is not PSD then $tildeC$ is not PSD, is this correct? and thus we cannot generate $[Y_1, Y_2]$ (unless we use the generalized inverse)
            $endgroup$
            – MrX
            19 hours ago










          • $begingroup$
            @MrX But why do you think $M$ is not PSD?
            $endgroup$
            – angryavian
            19 hours ago










          • $begingroup$
            I am assuming it is given that $M$ is not a PSD, I was thinking if there is a work around to generate $[X_1, X_2, Y_1,Y_2]$ when $M$ is not PSD, and then thought of this iterative method (first $[X_1, X_2]$ then $[Y_1,Y_2]$)... frankly it would make sense that $tildeC$ is not PSD if $M$ is not.
            $endgroup$
            – MrX
            19 hours ago











          Your Answer





          StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
          return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
          StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
          StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
          );
          );
          , "mathjax-editing");

          StackExchange.ready(function()
          var channelOptions =
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "69"
          ;
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
          createEditor();
          );

          else
          createEditor();

          );

          function createEditor()
          StackExchange.prepareEditor(
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
          convertImagesToLinks: true,
          noModals: true,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: 10,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          imageUploader:
          brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
          contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
          allowUrls: true
          ,
          noCode: true, onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          );



          );













          draft saved

          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function ()
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3140909%2fgenerating-correlated-normal-vectors-with-observations%23new-answer', 'question_page');

          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown

























          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes








          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes









          0












          $begingroup$

          You have a small typo: the conditional covariance is $C - B^top A^-1 B$.



          If you take for granted that the formula for conditional covariance is correct, then you know it must be PSD simply because it is a covariance matrix. (Similarly, you know $A$ and $C$ must be PSD since they are covariance matrices for $(X_1, X_2)$ and $(Y_1, Y_2)$).



          For general matrices that don't have any context as covariance matrices, you can refer to these results on the Schur complement.






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$












          • $begingroup$
            I corrected the typo, it is due to the fact I was initially using $sigma_x_i = sigma_x$, i.e.,$B$ would be symmetric.
            $endgroup$
            – MrX
            19 hours ago










          • $begingroup$
            But the core of my question boils down to the following: I think from the "if and only of" when $M$ is not PSD then $tildeC$ is not PSD, is this correct? and thus we cannot generate $[Y_1, Y_2]$ (unless we use the generalized inverse)
            $endgroup$
            – MrX
            19 hours ago










          • $begingroup$
            @MrX But why do you think $M$ is not PSD?
            $endgroup$
            – angryavian
            19 hours ago










          • $begingroup$
            I am assuming it is given that $M$ is not a PSD, I was thinking if there is a work around to generate $[X_1, X_2, Y_1,Y_2]$ when $M$ is not PSD, and then thought of this iterative method (first $[X_1, X_2]$ then $[Y_1,Y_2]$)... frankly it would make sense that $tildeC$ is not PSD if $M$ is not.
            $endgroup$
            – MrX
            19 hours ago
















          0












          $begingroup$

          You have a small typo: the conditional covariance is $C - B^top A^-1 B$.



          If you take for granted that the formula for conditional covariance is correct, then you know it must be PSD simply because it is a covariance matrix. (Similarly, you know $A$ and $C$ must be PSD since they are covariance matrices for $(X_1, X_2)$ and $(Y_1, Y_2)$).



          For general matrices that don't have any context as covariance matrices, you can refer to these results on the Schur complement.






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$












          • $begingroup$
            I corrected the typo, it is due to the fact I was initially using $sigma_x_i = sigma_x$, i.e.,$B$ would be symmetric.
            $endgroup$
            – MrX
            19 hours ago










          • $begingroup$
            But the core of my question boils down to the following: I think from the "if and only of" when $M$ is not PSD then $tildeC$ is not PSD, is this correct? and thus we cannot generate $[Y_1, Y_2]$ (unless we use the generalized inverse)
            $endgroup$
            – MrX
            19 hours ago










          • $begingroup$
            @MrX But why do you think $M$ is not PSD?
            $endgroup$
            – angryavian
            19 hours ago










          • $begingroup$
            I am assuming it is given that $M$ is not a PSD, I was thinking if there is a work around to generate $[X_1, X_2, Y_1,Y_2]$ when $M$ is not PSD, and then thought of this iterative method (first $[X_1, X_2]$ then $[Y_1,Y_2]$)... frankly it would make sense that $tildeC$ is not PSD if $M$ is not.
            $endgroup$
            – MrX
            19 hours ago














          0












          0








          0





          $begingroup$

          You have a small typo: the conditional covariance is $C - B^top A^-1 B$.



          If you take for granted that the formula for conditional covariance is correct, then you know it must be PSD simply because it is a covariance matrix. (Similarly, you know $A$ and $C$ must be PSD since they are covariance matrices for $(X_1, X_2)$ and $(Y_1, Y_2)$).



          For general matrices that don't have any context as covariance matrices, you can refer to these results on the Schur complement.






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$



          You have a small typo: the conditional covariance is $C - B^top A^-1 B$.



          If you take for granted that the formula for conditional covariance is correct, then you know it must be PSD simply because it is a covariance matrix. (Similarly, you know $A$ and $C$ must be PSD since they are covariance matrices for $(X_1, X_2)$ and $(Y_1, Y_2)$).



          For general matrices that don't have any context as covariance matrices, you can refer to these results on the Schur complement.







          share|cite|improve this answer












          share|cite|improve this answer



          share|cite|improve this answer










          answered yesterday









          angryavianangryavian

          42k23381




          42k23381











          • $begingroup$
            I corrected the typo, it is due to the fact I was initially using $sigma_x_i = sigma_x$, i.e.,$B$ would be symmetric.
            $endgroup$
            – MrX
            19 hours ago










          • $begingroup$
            But the core of my question boils down to the following: I think from the "if and only of" when $M$ is not PSD then $tildeC$ is not PSD, is this correct? and thus we cannot generate $[Y_1, Y_2]$ (unless we use the generalized inverse)
            $endgroup$
            – MrX
            19 hours ago










          • $begingroup$
            @MrX But why do you think $M$ is not PSD?
            $endgroup$
            – angryavian
            19 hours ago










          • $begingroup$
            I am assuming it is given that $M$ is not a PSD, I was thinking if there is a work around to generate $[X_1, X_2, Y_1,Y_2]$ when $M$ is not PSD, and then thought of this iterative method (first $[X_1, X_2]$ then $[Y_1,Y_2]$)... frankly it would make sense that $tildeC$ is not PSD if $M$ is not.
            $endgroup$
            – MrX
            19 hours ago

















          • $begingroup$
            I corrected the typo, it is due to the fact I was initially using $sigma_x_i = sigma_x$, i.e.,$B$ would be symmetric.
            $endgroup$
            – MrX
            19 hours ago










          • $begingroup$
            But the core of my question boils down to the following: I think from the "if and only of" when $M$ is not PSD then $tildeC$ is not PSD, is this correct? and thus we cannot generate $[Y_1, Y_2]$ (unless we use the generalized inverse)
            $endgroup$
            – MrX
            19 hours ago










          • $begingroup$
            @MrX But why do you think $M$ is not PSD?
            $endgroup$
            – angryavian
            19 hours ago










          • $begingroup$
            I am assuming it is given that $M$ is not a PSD, I was thinking if there is a work around to generate $[X_1, X_2, Y_1,Y_2]$ when $M$ is not PSD, and then thought of this iterative method (first $[X_1, X_2]$ then $[Y_1,Y_2]$)... frankly it would make sense that $tildeC$ is not PSD if $M$ is not.
            $endgroup$
            – MrX
            19 hours ago
















          $begingroup$
          I corrected the typo, it is due to the fact I was initially using $sigma_x_i = sigma_x$, i.e.,$B$ would be symmetric.
          $endgroup$
          – MrX
          19 hours ago




          $begingroup$
          I corrected the typo, it is due to the fact I was initially using $sigma_x_i = sigma_x$, i.e.,$B$ would be symmetric.
          $endgroup$
          – MrX
          19 hours ago












          $begingroup$
          But the core of my question boils down to the following: I think from the "if and only of" when $M$ is not PSD then $tildeC$ is not PSD, is this correct? and thus we cannot generate $[Y_1, Y_2]$ (unless we use the generalized inverse)
          $endgroup$
          – MrX
          19 hours ago




          $begingroup$
          But the core of my question boils down to the following: I think from the "if and only of" when $M$ is not PSD then $tildeC$ is not PSD, is this correct? and thus we cannot generate $[Y_1, Y_2]$ (unless we use the generalized inverse)
          $endgroup$
          – MrX
          19 hours ago












          $begingroup$
          @MrX But why do you think $M$ is not PSD?
          $endgroup$
          – angryavian
          19 hours ago




          $begingroup$
          @MrX But why do you think $M$ is not PSD?
          $endgroup$
          – angryavian
          19 hours ago












          $begingroup$
          I am assuming it is given that $M$ is not a PSD, I was thinking if there is a work around to generate $[X_1, X_2, Y_1,Y_2]$ when $M$ is not PSD, and then thought of this iterative method (first $[X_1, X_2]$ then $[Y_1,Y_2]$)... frankly it would make sense that $tildeC$ is not PSD if $M$ is not.
          $endgroup$
          – MrX
          19 hours ago





          $begingroup$
          I am assuming it is given that $M$ is not a PSD, I was thinking if there is a work around to generate $[X_1, X_2, Y_1,Y_2]$ when $M$ is not PSD, and then thought of this iterative method (first $[X_1, X_2]$ then $[Y_1,Y_2]$)... frankly it would make sense that $tildeC$ is not PSD if $M$ is not.
          $endgroup$
          – MrX
          19 hours ago


















          draft saved

          draft discarded
















































          Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

          But avoid


          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

          Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




          draft saved


          draft discarded














          StackExchange.ready(
          function ()
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3140909%2fgenerating-correlated-normal-vectors-with-observations%23new-answer', 'question_page');

          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown





















































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown

































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown







          Popular posts from this blog

          How should I support this large drywall patch? Planned maintenance scheduled April 23, 2019 at 00:00UTC (8:00pm US/Eastern) Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara Unicorn Meta Zoo #1: Why another podcast?How do I cover large gaps in drywall?How do I keep drywall around a patch from crumbling?Can I glue a second layer of drywall?How to patch long strip on drywall?Large drywall patch: how to avoid bulging seams?Drywall Mesh Patch vs. Bulge? To remove or not to remove?How to fix this drywall job?Prep drywall before backsplashWhat's the best way to fix this horrible drywall patch job?Drywall patching using 3M Patch Plus Primer

          random experiment with two different functions on unit interval Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara Planned maintenance scheduled April 23, 2019 at 00:00UTC (8:00pm US/Eastern)Random variable and probability space notionsRandom Walk with EdgesFinding functions where the increase over a random interval is Poisson distributedNumber of days until dayCan an observed event in fact be of zero probability?Unit random processmodels of coins and uniform distributionHow to get the number of successes given $n$ trials , probability $P$ and a random variable $X$Absorbing Markov chain in a computer. Is “almost every” turned into always convergence in computer executions?Stopped random walk is not uniformly integrable

          Lowndes Grove History Architecture References Navigation menu32°48′6″N 79°57′58″W / 32.80167°N 79.96611°W / 32.80167; -79.9661132°48′6″N 79°57′58″W / 32.80167°N 79.96611°W / 32.80167; -79.9661178002500"National Register Information System"Historic houses of South Carolina"Lowndes Grove""+32° 48' 6.00", −79° 57' 58.00""Lowndes Grove, Charleston County (260 St. Margaret St., Charleston)""Lowndes Grove"The Charleston ExpositionIt Happened in South Carolina"Lowndes Grove (House), Saint Margaret Street & Sixth Avenue, Charleston, Charleston County, SC(Photographs)"Plantations of the Carolina Low Countrye