About subalgebra of HamiltonMatrix representation of $mathbbC$Subfields of Matrix Ringscomposition series of moduleHow to prove the tensor product of two copies of $mathbbH$ is isomorphic to $M_4 (mathbbR)$?Calculate C*-subalgebra generated by $A$, $A^*$ and $mathbb 1$Logic behind cubic resolution of $x^4+px^2+qx+r=0$Finding a composition series for the Frobenius group $F_20$Compute the matrix with the standard basis.Show that $D^n$ is simple and uniqueIs this method to solve a system of equations in modular arithmetic correct?

Are small insurances worth it?

Vocabulary for giving just numbers, not a full answer

Gaining more land

Is this Paypal Github SDK reference really a dangerous site?

Dynamic Linkage of LocatorPane and InputField

PTIJ: Why does only a Shor Tam ask at the Seder, and not a Shor Mu'ad?

Finitely many repeated replacements

How to resolve: Reviewer #1 says remove section X vs. Reviewer #2 says expand section X

Source permutation

How exactly does an Ethernet collision happen in the cable, since nodes use different circuits for Tx and Rx?

I can't die. Who am I?

Shifting between bemols and diesis in the key signature

Why restrict private health insurance?

Recommendation letter by significant other if you worked with them professionally?

Called into a meeting and told we are being made redundant (laid off) and "not to share outside". Can I tell my partner?

Would an aboleth's Phantasmal Force lair action be affected by Counterspell, Dispel Magic, and/or Slow?

From an axiomatic set theoric approach why can we take uncountable unions?

Is it possible to avoid unpacking when merging Association?

Having the player face themselves after the mid-game

Has a sovereign Communist government ever run, and conceded loss, on a fair election?

Giving a career talk in my old university, how prominently should I tell students my salary?

How do spaceships determine each other's mass in space?

What are some noteworthy "mic-drop" moments in math?

MySQL importing CSV files really slow



About subalgebra of Hamilton


Matrix representation of $mathbbC$Subfields of Matrix Ringscomposition series of moduleHow to prove the tensor product of two copies of $mathbbH$ is isomorphic to $M_4 (mathbbR)$?Calculate C*-subalgebra generated by $A$, $A^*$ and $mathbb 1$Logic behind cubic resolution of $x^4+px^2+qx+r=0$Finding a composition series for the Frobenius group $F_20$Compute the matrix with the standard basis.Show that $D^n$ is simple and uniqueIs this method to solve a system of equations in modular arithmetic correct?













0












$begingroup$


could someone help me with this question?



I have to prove that $$H=leftleft(beginarraylcr a&-barb\b&baraendarrayright):;a,binmathbbCright$$
is a real subalgebra of $M_2(mathbbC)$.



My attempt



I am trying to use the following facts, but I don't know if they can help:



  • $H$ is an algebra isomorphic to $leftleft(beginarraylcrc_1&-c_2&-c_3&-c_4\c_2&c_1&-c_4&c_3\c_3&c_4&c_1&-c_2\c_4&-c_3&c_2&c_1endarrayright):;c_1,c_2,c_3,c_4inmathbbRright$. This is a real subalgebra of $M_4(mathbbC)$


  • $mathbbC$ is an algebra isomorphic to $leftleft(beginarraylcrp&-q\q&pendarrayright):;p,qinmathbbRright$. This a subalgebra of $M_2(mathbbR)$


Does someone know if it possible prove it by using this?
Is there a better (shorter) way?



Thanks.










share|cite|improve this question









New contributor




prosep is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.







$endgroup$
















    0












    $begingroup$


    could someone help me with this question?



    I have to prove that $$H=leftleft(beginarraylcr a&-barb\b&baraendarrayright):;a,binmathbbCright$$
    is a real subalgebra of $M_2(mathbbC)$.



    My attempt



    I am trying to use the following facts, but I don't know if they can help:



    • $H$ is an algebra isomorphic to $leftleft(beginarraylcrc_1&-c_2&-c_3&-c_4\c_2&c_1&-c_4&c_3\c_3&c_4&c_1&-c_2\c_4&-c_3&c_2&c_1endarrayright):;c_1,c_2,c_3,c_4inmathbbRright$. This is a real subalgebra of $M_4(mathbbC)$


    • $mathbbC$ is an algebra isomorphic to $leftleft(beginarraylcrp&-q\q&pendarrayright):;p,qinmathbbRright$. This a subalgebra of $M_2(mathbbR)$


    Does someone know if it possible prove it by using this?
    Is there a better (shorter) way?



    Thanks.










    share|cite|improve this question









    New contributor




    prosep is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
    Check out our Code of Conduct.







    $endgroup$














      0












      0








      0





      $begingroup$


      could someone help me with this question?



      I have to prove that $$H=leftleft(beginarraylcr a&-barb\b&baraendarrayright):;a,binmathbbCright$$
      is a real subalgebra of $M_2(mathbbC)$.



      My attempt



      I am trying to use the following facts, but I don't know if they can help:



      • $H$ is an algebra isomorphic to $leftleft(beginarraylcrc_1&-c_2&-c_3&-c_4\c_2&c_1&-c_4&c_3\c_3&c_4&c_1&-c_2\c_4&-c_3&c_2&c_1endarrayright):;c_1,c_2,c_3,c_4inmathbbRright$. This is a real subalgebra of $M_4(mathbbC)$


      • $mathbbC$ is an algebra isomorphic to $leftleft(beginarraylcrp&-q\q&pendarrayright):;p,qinmathbbRright$. This a subalgebra of $M_2(mathbbR)$


      Does someone know if it possible prove it by using this?
      Is there a better (shorter) way?



      Thanks.










      share|cite|improve this question









      New contributor




      prosep is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.







      $endgroup$




      could someone help me with this question?



      I have to prove that $$H=leftleft(beginarraylcr a&-barb\b&baraendarrayright):;a,binmathbbCright$$
      is a real subalgebra of $M_2(mathbbC)$.



      My attempt



      I am trying to use the following facts, but I don't know if they can help:



      • $H$ is an algebra isomorphic to $leftleft(beginarraylcrc_1&-c_2&-c_3&-c_4\c_2&c_1&-c_4&c_3\c_3&c_4&c_1&-c_2\c_4&-c_3&c_2&c_1endarrayright):;c_1,c_2,c_3,c_4inmathbbRright$. This is a real subalgebra of $M_4(mathbbC)$


      • $mathbbC$ is an algebra isomorphic to $leftleft(beginarraylcrp&-q\q&pendarrayright):;p,qinmathbbRright$. This a subalgebra of $M_2(mathbbR)$


      Does someone know if it possible prove it by using this?
      Is there a better (shorter) way?



      Thanks.







      abstract-algebra






      share|cite|improve this question









      New contributor




      prosep is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.











      share|cite|improve this question









      New contributor




      prosep is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.









      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question








      edited yesterday









      J. W. Tanner

      3,0121320




      3,0121320






      New contributor




      prosep is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.









      asked yesterday









      prosepprosep

      1




      1




      New contributor




      prosep is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.





      New contributor





      prosep is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.






      prosep is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.




















          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          0












          $begingroup$

          Yes, there is a better way. Prove that:



          • the sum of two elements of $H$ is again an element of $H$;

          • the product of an element of $H$ by a real number is an element of $H$;

          • the product of two elements of $H$ is again an element of $H$.





          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$












          • $begingroup$
            Thanks. I have thought of this way but I wondered if there is a shorter proof.
            $endgroup$
            – prosep
            yesterday










          • $begingroup$
            I seriously doubt that.
            $endgroup$
            – José Carlos Santos
            yesterday










          Your Answer





          StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
          return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
          StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
          StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
          );
          );
          , "mathjax-editing");

          StackExchange.ready(function()
          var channelOptions =
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "69"
          ;
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
          createEditor();
          );

          else
          createEditor();

          );

          function createEditor()
          StackExchange.prepareEditor(
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
          convertImagesToLinks: true,
          noModals: true,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: 10,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          imageUploader:
          brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
          contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
          allowUrls: true
          ,
          noCode: true, onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          );



          );






          prosep is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.









          draft saved

          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function ()
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3140966%2fabout-subalgebra-of-hamilton%23new-answer', 'question_page');

          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown

























          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes








          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes









          0












          $begingroup$

          Yes, there is a better way. Prove that:



          • the sum of two elements of $H$ is again an element of $H$;

          • the product of an element of $H$ by a real number is an element of $H$;

          • the product of two elements of $H$ is again an element of $H$.





          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$












          • $begingroup$
            Thanks. I have thought of this way but I wondered if there is a shorter proof.
            $endgroup$
            – prosep
            yesterday










          • $begingroup$
            I seriously doubt that.
            $endgroup$
            – José Carlos Santos
            yesterday















          0












          $begingroup$

          Yes, there is a better way. Prove that:



          • the sum of two elements of $H$ is again an element of $H$;

          • the product of an element of $H$ by a real number is an element of $H$;

          • the product of two elements of $H$ is again an element of $H$.





          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$












          • $begingroup$
            Thanks. I have thought of this way but I wondered if there is a shorter proof.
            $endgroup$
            – prosep
            yesterday










          • $begingroup$
            I seriously doubt that.
            $endgroup$
            – José Carlos Santos
            yesterday













          0












          0








          0





          $begingroup$

          Yes, there is a better way. Prove that:



          • the sum of two elements of $H$ is again an element of $H$;

          • the product of an element of $H$ by a real number is an element of $H$;

          • the product of two elements of $H$ is again an element of $H$.





          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$



          Yes, there is a better way. Prove that:



          • the sum of two elements of $H$ is again an element of $H$;

          • the product of an element of $H$ by a real number is an element of $H$;

          • the product of two elements of $H$ is again an element of $H$.






          share|cite|improve this answer












          share|cite|improve this answer



          share|cite|improve this answer










          answered yesterday









          José Carlos SantosJosé Carlos Santos

          166k22132235




          166k22132235











          • $begingroup$
            Thanks. I have thought of this way but I wondered if there is a shorter proof.
            $endgroup$
            – prosep
            yesterday










          • $begingroup$
            I seriously doubt that.
            $endgroup$
            – José Carlos Santos
            yesterday
















          • $begingroup$
            Thanks. I have thought of this way but I wondered if there is a shorter proof.
            $endgroup$
            – prosep
            yesterday










          • $begingroup$
            I seriously doubt that.
            $endgroup$
            – José Carlos Santos
            yesterday















          $begingroup$
          Thanks. I have thought of this way but I wondered if there is a shorter proof.
          $endgroup$
          – prosep
          yesterday




          $begingroup$
          Thanks. I have thought of this way but I wondered if there is a shorter proof.
          $endgroup$
          – prosep
          yesterday












          $begingroup$
          I seriously doubt that.
          $endgroup$
          – José Carlos Santos
          yesterday




          $begingroup$
          I seriously doubt that.
          $endgroup$
          – José Carlos Santos
          yesterday










          prosep is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.









          draft saved

          draft discarded


















          prosep is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.












          prosep is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.











          prosep is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.














          Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

          But avoid


          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

          Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




          draft saved


          draft discarded














          StackExchange.ready(
          function ()
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3140966%2fabout-subalgebra-of-hamilton%23new-answer', 'question_page');

          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown





















































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown

































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown







          Popular posts from this blog

          How should I support this large drywall patch? Planned maintenance scheduled April 23, 2019 at 00:00UTC (8:00pm US/Eastern) Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara Unicorn Meta Zoo #1: Why another podcast?How do I cover large gaps in drywall?How do I keep drywall around a patch from crumbling?Can I glue a second layer of drywall?How to patch long strip on drywall?Large drywall patch: how to avoid bulging seams?Drywall Mesh Patch vs. Bulge? To remove or not to remove?How to fix this drywall job?Prep drywall before backsplashWhat's the best way to fix this horrible drywall patch job?Drywall patching using 3M Patch Plus Primer

          random experiment with two different functions on unit interval Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara Planned maintenance scheduled April 23, 2019 at 00:00UTC (8:00pm US/Eastern)Random variable and probability space notionsRandom Walk with EdgesFinding functions where the increase over a random interval is Poisson distributedNumber of days until dayCan an observed event in fact be of zero probability?Unit random processmodels of coins and uniform distributionHow to get the number of successes given $n$ trials , probability $P$ and a random variable $X$Absorbing Markov chain in a computer. Is “almost every” turned into always convergence in computer executions?Stopped random walk is not uniformly integrable

          Lowndes Grove History Architecture References Navigation menu32°48′6″N 79°57′58″W / 32.80167°N 79.96611°W / 32.80167; -79.9661132°48′6″N 79°57′58″W / 32.80167°N 79.96611°W / 32.80167; -79.9661178002500"National Register Information System"Historic houses of South Carolina"Lowndes Grove""+32° 48' 6.00", −79° 57' 58.00""Lowndes Grove, Charleston County (260 St. Margaret St., Charleston)""Lowndes Grove"The Charleston ExpositionIt Happened in South Carolina"Lowndes Grove (House), Saint Margaret Street & Sixth Avenue, Charleston, Charleston County, SC(Photographs)"Plantations of the Carolina Low Countrye