Does it necessarily follow that the integral curves of $k^a$ are null geodesics?Geodesics of null surface and induced connectionIntegral curves of the gradientParameter Curves are GeodesicsA smooth function f satisfies $left|operatorname grad f right|=1$ ,then the integral curves of $operatornamegrad f$ are geodesicsIntegral curves in null hypersurfacesIntegral curves and null geodesicsIdentity in general relativity, not sure if true or not“Flow lines” of “dust” are geodesics?Integral curves of vector field are geodesicsOrthogonal geodesics to hypersurfacesWhy there are such angular coordinates?

Dynamic Linkage of LocatorPane and InputField

Expressing logarithmic equations without logs

Why do we say ‘pairwise disjoint’, rather than ‘disjoint’?

Having the player face themselves after the mid-game

Does an unused member variable take up memory?

What is the generally accepted pronunciation of “topoi”?

Signed and unsigned numbers

ER diagram relationship node size adjustment

Specifying a starting column with colortbl package and xcolor

How do we create new idioms and use them in a novel?

I reported the illegal activity of my boss to his boss. My boss found out. Now I am being punished. What should I do?

What's the 'present simple' form of the word "нашла́" in 3rd person singular female?

Is a piano played in the same way as a harmonium?

Why does Solve lock up when trying to solve the quadratic equation with large integers?

Giving a career talk in my old university, how prominently should I tell students my salary?

Why couldn't the separatists legally leave the Republic?

How do spaceships determine each other's mass in space?

From an axiomatic set theoric approach why can we take uncountable unions?

Plausibility of Mushroom Buildings

Trig Subsitution When There's No Square Root

Does Christianity allow for believing on someone else's behalf?

Is it possible that a question has only two answers?

Finitely many repeated replacements

Can't make sense of a paragraph from Lovecraft



Does it necessarily follow that the integral curves of $k^a$ are null geodesics?


Geodesics of null surface and induced connectionIntegral curves of the gradientParameter Curves are GeodesicsA smooth function f satisfies $left|operatorname grad f right|=1$ ,then the integral curves of $operatornamegrad f$ are geodesicsIntegral curves in null hypersurfacesIntegral curves and null geodesicsIdentity in general relativity, not sure if true or not“Flow lines” of “dust” are geodesics?Integral curves of vector field are geodesicsOrthogonal geodesics to hypersurfacesWhy there are such angular coordinates?













5












$begingroup$


Let $f$ be a function on a spacetime $(M, g_ab)$ whose gradient, $k_a = nabla_a f$, ie everywhere null, i.e., $k_ak^a = 0$ throughout $M$. Does it necessarily follow that the integral curves of $k^a$ are null geodesics?










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$
















    5












    $begingroup$


    Let $f$ be a function on a spacetime $(M, g_ab)$ whose gradient, $k_a = nabla_a f$, ie everywhere null, i.e., $k_ak^a = 0$ throughout $M$. Does it necessarily follow that the integral curves of $k^a$ are null geodesics?










    share|cite|improve this question











    $endgroup$














      5












      5








      5


      1



      $begingroup$


      Let $f$ be a function on a spacetime $(M, g_ab)$ whose gradient, $k_a = nabla_a f$, ie everywhere null, i.e., $k_ak^a = 0$ throughout $M$. Does it necessarily follow that the integral curves of $k^a$ are null geodesics?










      share|cite|improve this question











      $endgroup$




      Let $f$ be a function on a spacetime $(M, g_ab)$ whose gradient, $k_a = nabla_a f$, ie everywhere null, i.e., $k_ak^a = 0$ throughout $M$. Does it necessarily follow that the integral curves of $k^a$ are null geodesics?







      differential-geometry manifolds riemannian-geometry mathematical-physics general-relativity






      share|cite|improve this question















      share|cite|improve this question













      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question








      edited yesterday









      Andrews

      1,2641420




      1,2641420










      asked Apr 4 '16 at 3:18









      StudentStudent

      271317




      271317




















          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          3












          $begingroup$

          The condition that $k$ is a gradient implies that it is curl-free; i.e. $nabla_i k_j = nabla_j k_i$. Let $gamma$ be an integral curve of $k^i$; i.e. $dot gamma^i(t) = k^i(gamma(t))$. Then replacing $dot gamma$ with $k$ in the covariant acceleration and applying the curl-free condition we get $$ddot gamma^i = dot gamma^j nabla_j dot gamma^i = k^j nabla_j k^i = k^j nabla^i k_j.$$



          Now we're basically done - just recognize the RHS as $frac12 nabla^i (k^j k_j)$, at which point the fact that $k$ is null ($k^j k_j = 0$) tells us that $ddot gamma = 0$; i.e. $gamma$ is a geodesic.






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$












            Your Answer





            StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
            return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
            StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
            StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
            );
            );
            , "mathjax-editing");

            StackExchange.ready(function()
            var channelOptions =
            tags: "".split(" "),
            id: "69"
            ;
            initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

            StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
            // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
            if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
            StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
            createEditor();
            );

            else
            createEditor();

            );

            function createEditor()
            StackExchange.prepareEditor(
            heartbeatType: 'answer',
            autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
            convertImagesToLinks: true,
            noModals: true,
            showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
            reputationToPostImages: 10,
            bindNavPrevention: true,
            postfix: "",
            imageUploader:
            brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
            contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
            allowUrls: true
            ,
            noCode: true, onDemand: true,
            discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
            ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
            );



            );













            draft saved

            draft discarded


















            StackExchange.ready(
            function ()
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f1726869%2fdoes-it-necessarily-follow-that-the-integral-curves-of-ka-are-null-geodesics%23new-answer', 'question_page');

            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown

























            1 Answer
            1






            active

            oldest

            votes








            1 Answer
            1






            active

            oldest

            votes









            active

            oldest

            votes






            active

            oldest

            votes









            3












            $begingroup$

            The condition that $k$ is a gradient implies that it is curl-free; i.e. $nabla_i k_j = nabla_j k_i$. Let $gamma$ be an integral curve of $k^i$; i.e. $dot gamma^i(t) = k^i(gamma(t))$. Then replacing $dot gamma$ with $k$ in the covariant acceleration and applying the curl-free condition we get $$ddot gamma^i = dot gamma^j nabla_j dot gamma^i = k^j nabla_j k^i = k^j nabla^i k_j.$$



            Now we're basically done - just recognize the RHS as $frac12 nabla^i (k^j k_j)$, at which point the fact that $k$ is null ($k^j k_j = 0$) tells us that $ddot gamma = 0$; i.e. $gamma$ is a geodesic.






            share|cite|improve this answer









            $endgroup$

















              3












              $begingroup$

              The condition that $k$ is a gradient implies that it is curl-free; i.e. $nabla_i k_j = nabla_j k_i$. Let $gamma$ be an integral curve of $k^i$; i.e. $dot gamma^i(t) = k^i(gamma(t))$. Then replacing $dot gamma$ with $k$ in the covariant acceleration and applying the curl-free condition we get $$ddot gamma^i = dot gamma^j nabla_j dot gamma^i = k^j nabla_j k^i = k^j nabla^i k_j.$$



              Now we're basically done - just recognize the RHS as $frac12 nabla^i (k^j k_j)$, at which point the fact that $k$ is null ($k^j k_j = 0$) tells us that $ddot gamma = 0$; i.e. $gamma$ is a geodesic.






              share|cite|improve this answer









              $endgroup$















                3












                3








                3





                $begingroup$

                The condition that $k$ is a gradient implies that it is curl-free; i.e. $nabla_i k_j = nabla_j k_i$. Let $gamma$ be an integral curve of $k^i$; i.e. $dot gamma^i(t) = k^i(gamma(t))$. Then replacing $dot gamma$ with $k$ in the covariant acceleration and applying the curl-free condition we get $$ddot gamma^i = dot gamma^j nabla_j dot gamma^i = k^j nabla_j k^i = k^j nabla^i k_j.$$



                Now we're basically done - just recognize the RHS as $frac12 nabla^i (k^j k_j)$, at which point the fact that $k$ is null ($k^j k_j = 0$) tells us that $ddot gamma = 0$; i.e. $gamma$ is a geodesic.






                share|cite|improve this answer









                $endgroup$



                The condition that $k$ is a gradient implies that it is curl-free; i.e. $nabla_i k_j = nabla_j k_i$. Let $gamma$ be an integral curve of $k^i$; i.e. $dot gamma^i(t) = k^i(gamma(t))$. Then replacing $dot gamma$ with $k$ in the covariant acceleration and applying the curl-free condition we get $$ddot gamma^i = dot gamma^j nabla_j dot gamma^i = k^j nabla_j k^i = k^j nabla^i k_j.$$



                Now we're basically done - just recognize the RHS as $frac12 nabla^i (k^j k_j)$, at which point the fact that $k$ is null ($k^j k_j = 0$) tells us that $ddot gamma = 0$; i.e. $gamma$ is a geodesic.







                share|cite|improve this answer












                share|cite|improve this answer



                share|cite|improve this answer










                answered Apr 4 '16 at 12:13









                Anthony CarapetisAnthony Carapetis

                27.4k32966




                27.4k32966



























                    draft saved

                    draft discarded
















































                    Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


                    • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                    But avoid


                    • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                    • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

                    Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


                    To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                    draft saved


                    draft discarded














                    StackExchange.ready(
                    function ()
                    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f1726869%2fdoes-it-necessarily-follow-that-the-integral-curves-of-ka-are-null-geodesics%23new-answer', 'question_page');

                    );

                    Post as a guest















                    Required, but never shown





















































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown

































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown







                    Popular posts from this blog

                    Moe incest case Sentencing See also References Navigation menu"'Australian Josef Fritzl' fathered four children by daughter""Small town recoils in horror at 'Australian Fritzl' incest case""Victorian rape allegations echo Fritzl case - Just In (Australian Broadcasting Corporation)""Incest father jailed for 22 years""'Australian Fritzl' sentenced to 22 years in prison for abusing daughter for three decades""RSJ v The Queen"

                    Who is our nearest planetary neighbor, on average?Santa Claus flies to the South PoleSeven Spheres of Unequal Mass, a weighing problem with a twistDescribe a large integerFast Mental Calculation of $7.5^7$Math in Space (without the help of celebrities)Find the value of $bigstar$: Puzzle 8 - InequalityWho drinks beer while running anyway?A Crucial DeliveryRanking And AverageHow long will my money last at roulette?

                    Daza language Contents Vocabulary Phonology References External links Navigation menudaza1242Daza"Dazaga"eeee178086576