There exists a lattice point $(a,b)$ whose distance from every *visible* point is greater than $n$.Prove that there exists a $m×m$ lattice square in the $x-y$ plane such that none of its coordinates are visibleEvery integer greater than 1 is divisible by a primesucessive primes with distance greater than kProve that for any natural number $n$ there exists a prime number $p$ greater than $n$Every prime divisor of $n! + 1$ is an odd integer greater than $n$A point whose coordinates are both integers is called a lattice point. How many lattice points lie on the hyperbola $x^2 -y^2 = 2000^2$A new property of Rowland's sequence or there is a counterexample? Each element $a_i$ is a witness of a greater $a_j$ whose index $j$ is always primeProve that among any five consecutive positive integers there is one integer which is relatively prime to the other four integers.A question about lattice visible point in the planeIs there a prime $p$ whose successor is greater than $2p$?$IMO 2014$ shortlist question. PigeonHole-Principle to solve?

Can a virus destroy the BIOS of a modern computer?

Should I tell management that I intend to leave due to bad software development practices?

Why is it a bad idea to hire a hitman to eliminate most corrupt politicians?

I would say: "You are another teacher", but she is a woman and I am a man

Avoiding the "not like other girls" trope?

How dangerous is XSS?

Examples of smooth manifolds admitting inbetween one and a continuum of complex structures

Detention in 1997

One verb to replace 'be a member of' a club

Dreadful Dastardly Diseases, or Always Atrocious Ailments

Extract rows of a table, that include less than x NULLs

Why would the Red Woman birth a shadow if she worshipped the Lord of the Light?

What is the difference between 仮定 and 想定?

Short story with a alien planet, government officials must wear exploding medallions

What is the most common color to indicate the input-field is disabled?

Can my sorcerer use a spellbook only to collect spells and scribe scrolls, not cast?

Size of subfigure fitting its content (tikzpicture)

How can saying a song's name be a copyright violation?

Avoiding direct proof while writing proof by induction

How would I stat a creature to be immune to everything but the Magic Missile spell? (just for fun)

What mechanic is there to disable a threat instead of killing it?

Is there a hemisphere-neutral way of specifying a season?

Why are the 737's rear doors unusable in a water landing?

What method can I use to design a dungeon difficult enough that the PCs can't make it through without killing them?



There exists a lattice point $(a,b)$ whose distance from every *visible* point is greater than $n$.


Prove that there exists a $m×m$ lattice square in the $x-y$ plane such that none of its coordinates are visibleEvery integer greater than 1 is divisible by a primesucessive primes with distance greater than kProve that for any natural number $n$ there exists a prime number $p$ greater than $n$Every prime divisor of $n! + 1$ is an odd integer greater than $n$A point whose coordinates are both integers is called a lattice point. How many lattice points lie on the hyperbola $x^2 -y^2 = 2000^2$A new property of Rowland's sequence or there is a counterexample? Each element $a_i$ is a witness of a greater $a_j$ whose index $j$ is always primeProve that among any five consecutive positive integers there is one integer which is relatively prime to the other four integers.A question about lattice visible point in the planeIs there a prime $p$ whose successor is greater than $2p$?$IMO 2014$ shortlist question. PigeonHole-Principle to solve?













5












$begingroup$


Question- A lattice point $(x,y)inmathbbZ^2$ is called visible if $gcd(x,y)=1$. Prove that given a positive integer $n$, there exists a lattice point $(a,b)$ whose distance from every visible point is greater than $n$.



I am totally nowhere near progress on this. I was thinking of trying pigeon hole principle, but cant find any appropriate candidate pigeons. Please give any hints to start.










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$











  • $begingroup$
    Anyone please help!
    $endgroup$
    – gambler101
    Aug 21 '16 at 12:33















5












$begingroup$


Question- A lattice point $(x,y)inmathbbZ^2$ is called visible if $gcd(x,y)=1$. Prove that given a positive integer $n$, there exists a lattice point $(a,b)$ whose distance from every visible point is greater than $n$.



I am totally nowhere near progress on this. I was thinking of trying pigeon hole principle, but cant find any appropriate candidate pigeons. Please give any hints to start.










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$











  • $begingroup$
    Anyone please help!
    $endgroup$
    – gambler101
    Aug 21 '16 at 12:33













5












5








5


2



$begingroup$


Question- A lattice point $(x,y)inmathbbZ^2$ is called visible if $gcd(x,y)=1$. Prove that given a positive integer $n$, there exists a lattice point $(a,b)$ whose distance from every visible point is greater than $n$.



I am totally nowhere near progress on this. I was thinking of trying pigeon hole principle, but cant find any appropriate candidate pigeons. Please give any hints to start.










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$




Question- A lattice point $(x,y)inmathbbZ^2$ is called visible if $gcd(x,y)=1$. Prove that given a positive integer $n$, there exists a lattice point $(a,b)$ whose distance from every visible point is greater than $n$.



I am totally nowhere near progress on this. I was thinking of trying pigeon hole principle, but cant find any appropriate candidate pigeons. Please give any hints to start.







number-theory elementary-number-theory contest-math






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited Aug 21 '16 at 18:02







gambler101

















asked Aug 17 '16 at 15:53









gambler101gambler101

707214




707214











  • $begingroup$
    Anyone please help!
    $endgroup$
    – gambler101
    Aug 21 '16 at 12:33
















  • $begingroup$
    Anyone please help!
    $endgroup$
    – gambler101
    Aug 21 '16 at 12:33















$begingroup$
Anyone please help!
$endgroup$
– gambler101
Aug 21 '16 at 12:33




$begingroup$
Anyone please help!
$endgroup$
– gambler101
Aug 21 '16 at 12:33










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















2












$begingroup$

This follows from Theorem 7.3 in the book “Mathematical Journeys,” by Peter D. Schumer. The proof, which uses the Chinese remainder theorem, can be seen on Google Books here or (summarized) by hovering over the spoiler paragraph below.



Schumer constructs an $ntimes n$ square of invisible lattice points as follows. (You can choose $(a,b)$ at the center of such a square of side $2n$.)



The proof goes like this:




Arrange the first $n^2$ primes in an $ntimes n$ array and denote by $m_i$ the product across the $i$-th row and by $M_i$ the product down the $i$-th column. Then consider two systems of congruences: The system $xequiv -i mod m_i$ and the system $yequiv -imod M_i$. Modulo $P=prod m_i=prod M_i$, these systems have unique solutions $xequiv_P a$ and $yequiv_P b$ (by the Chinese Reminder Theorem). Then the square with lower left corner $(a+1,b+1)$ and upper right corner $(a+n,b+n)$ contains no visible lattice points, because for any integers $i,j$ between $1$ and $n$, both $a+i$ and $b+j$ will be divisible by the prime $p$ in row $i$ and column $j$ of the array of primes.







share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$













    Your Answer





    StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
    return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
    StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
    StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
    );
    );
    , "mathjax-editing");

    StackExchange.ready(function()
    var channelOptions =
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "69"
    ;
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
    createEditor();
    );

    else
    createEditor();

    );

    function createEditor()
    StackExchange.prepareEditor(
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
    convertImagesToLinks: true,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: 10,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader:
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    ,
    noCode: true, onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    );



    );













    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function ()
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f1895206%2fthere-exists-a-lattice-point-a-b-whose-distance-from-every-visible-point-i%23new-answer', 'question_page');

    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes








    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    2












    $begingroup$

    This follows from Theorem 7.3 in the book “Mathematical Journeys,” by Peter D. Schumer. The proof, which uses the Chinese remainder theorem, can be seen on Google Books here or (summarized) by hovering over the spoiler paragraph below.



    Schumer constructs an $ntimes n$ square of invisible lattice points as follows. (You can choose $(a,b)$ at the center of such a square of side $2n$.)



    The proof goes like this:




    Arrange the first $n^2$ primes in an $ntimes n$ array and denote by $m_i$ the product across the $i$-th row and by $M_i$ the product down the $i$-th column. Then consider two systems of congruences: The system $xequiv -i mod m_i$ and the system $yequiv -imod M_i$. Modulo $P=prod m_i=prod M_i$, these systems have unique solutions $xequiv_P a$ and $yequiv_P b$ (by the Chinese Reminder Theorem). Then the square with lower left corner $(a+1,b+1)$ and upper right corner $(a+n,b+n)$ contains no visible lattice points, because for any integers $i,j$ between $1$ and $n$, both $a+i$ and $b+j$ will be divisible by the prime $p$ in row $i$ and column $j$ of the array of primes.







    share|cite|improve this answer











    $endgroup$

















      2












      $begingroup$

      This follows from Theorem 7.3 in the book “Mathematical Journeys,” by Peter D. Schumer. The proof, which uses the Chinese remainder theorem, can be seen on Google Books here or (summarized) by hovering over the spoiler paragraph below.



      Schumer constructs an $ntimes n$ square of invisible lattice points as follows. (You can choose $(a,b)$ at the center of such a square of side $2n$.)



      The proof goes like this:




      Arrange the first $n^2$ primes in an $ntimes n$ array and denote by $m_i$ the product across the $i$-th row and by $M_i$ the product down the $i$-th column. Then consider two systems of congruences: The system $xequiv -i mod m_i$ and the system $yequiv -imod M_i$. Modulo $P=prod m_i=prod M_i$, these systems have unique solutions $xequiv_P a$ and $yequiv_P b$ (by the Chinese Reminder Theorem). Then the square with lower left corner $(a+1,b+1)$ and upper right corner $(a+n,b+n)$ contains no visible lattice points, because for any integers $i,j$ between $1$ and $n$, both $a+i$ and $b+j$ will be divisible by the prime $p$ in row $i$ and column $j$ of the array of primes.







      share|cite|improve this answer











      $endgroup$















        2












        2








        2





        $begingroup$

        This follows from Theorem 7.3 in the book “Mathematical Journeys,” by Peter D. Schumer. The proof, which uses the Chinese remainder theorem, can be seen on Google Books here or (summarized) by hovering over the spoiler paragraph below.



        Schumer constructs an $ntimes n$ square of invisible lattice points as follows. (You can choose $(a,b)$ at the center of such a square of side $2n$.)



        The proof goes like this:




        Arrange the first $n^2$ primes in an $ntimes n$ array and denote by $m_i$ the product across the $i$-th row and by $M_i$ the product down the $i$-th column. Then consider two systems of congruences: The system $xequiv -i mod m_i$ and the system $yequiv -imod M_i$. Modulo $P=prod m_i=prod M_i$, these systems have unique solutions $xequiv_P a$ and $yequiv_P b$ (by the Chinese Reminder Theorem). Then the square with lower left corner $(a+1,b+1)$ and upper right corner $(a+n,b+n)$ contains no visible lattice points, because for any integers $i,j$ between $1$ and $n$, both $a+i$ and $b+j$ will be divisible by the prime $p$ in row $i$ and column $j$ of the array of primes.







        share|cite|improve this answer











        $endgroup$



        This follows from Theorem 7.3 in the book “Mathematical Journeys,” by Peter D. Schumer. The proof, which uses the Chinese remainder theorem, can be seen on Google Books here or (summarized) by hovering over the spoiler paragraph below.



        Schumer constructs an $ntimes n$ square of invisible lattice points as follows. (You can choose $(a,b)$ at the center of such a square of side $2n$.)



        The proof goes like this:




        Arrange the first $n^2$ primes in an $ntimes n$ array and denote by $m_i$ the product across the $i$-th row and by $M_i$ the product down the $i$-th column. Then consider two systems of congruences: The system $xequiv -i mod m_i$ and the system $yequiv -imod M_i$. Modulo $P=prod m_i=prod M_i$, these systems have unique solutions $xequiv_P a$ and $yequiv_P b$ (by the Chinese Reminder Theorem). Then the square with lower left corner $(a+1,b+1)$ and upper right corner $(a+n,b+n)$ contains no visible lattice points, because for any integers $i,j$ between $1$ and $n$, both $a+i$ and $b+j$ will be divisible by the prime $p$ in row $i$ and column $j$ of the array of primes.








        share|cite|improve this answer














        share|cite|improve this answer



        share|cite|improve this answer








        edited Aug 21 '16 at 19:12

























        answered Aug 21 '16 at 19:00









        Steve KassSteve Kass

        11.4k11530




        11.4k11530



























            draft saved

            draft discarded
















































            Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid


            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

            Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function ()
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f1895206%2fthere-exists-a-lattice-point-a-b-whose-distance-from-every-visible-point-i%23new-answer', 'question_page');

            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            Popular posts from this blog

            How should I support this large drywall patch? Planned maintenance scheduled April 23, 2019 at 00:00UTC (8:00pm US/Eastern) Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara Unicorn Meta Zoo #1: Why another podcast?How do I cover large gaps in drywall?How do I keep drywall around a patch from crumbling?Can I glue a second layer of drywall?How to patch long strip on drywall?Large drywall patch: how to avoid bulging seams?Drywall Mesh Patch vs. Bulge? To remove or not to remove?How to fix this drywall job?Prep drywall before backsplashWhat's the best way to fix this horrible drywall patch job?Drywall patching using 3M Patch Plus Primer

            random experiment with two different functions on unit interval Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara Planned maintenance scheduled April 23, 2019 at 00:00UTC (8:00pm US/Eastern)Random variable and probability space notionsRandom Walk with EdgesFinding functions where the increase over a random interval is Poisson distributedNumber of days until dayCan an observed event in fact be of zero probability?Unit random processmodels of coins and uniform distributionHow to get the number of successes given $n$ trials , probability $P$ and a random variable $X$Absorbing Markov chain in a computer. Is “almost every” turned into always convergence in computer executions?Stopped random walk is not uniformly integrable

            Lowndes Grove History Architecture References Navigation menu32°48′6″N 79°57′58″W / 32.80167°N 79.96611°W / 32.80167; -79.9661132°48′6″N 79°57′58″W / 32.80167°N 79.96611°W / 32.80167; -79.9661178002500"National Register Information System"Historic houses of South Carolina"Lowndes Grove""+32° 48' 6.00", −79° 57' 58.00""Lowndes Grove, Charleston County (260 St. Margaret St., Charleston)""Lowndes Grove"The Charleston ExpositionIt Happened in South Carolina"Lowndes Grove (House), Saint Margaret Street & Sixth Avenue, Charleston, Charleston County, SC(Photographs)"Plantations of the Carolina Low Countrye