Inequality with log-sumImpossible inequality : Dottie NumberA simple application of Jensen's inequalityTitan inequality for amateurInequality for amateursKaramata + Jensen = Niculescu's inequality (version of 1991)Hard inequality with condition ($xyz=1$)Inequality using JensenRefinement of a strong inequalityPower sum inequalityPower sum refinement inequality

How dangerous is XSS?

Is it acceptable for a professor to tell male students to not think that they are smarter than female students?

Short story with a alien planet, government officials must wear exploding medallions

How can I determine if the org that I'm currently connected to is a scratch org?

How do I handle a potential work/personal life conflict as the manager of one of my friends?

Why can't we play rap on piano?

Detention in 1997

Why are the 737's rear doors unusable in a water landing?

Alternative to sending password over mail?

How to show a landlord what we have in savings?

Why was the shrinking from 8″ made only to 5.25″ and not smaller (4″ or less)?

What killed these X2 caps?

How do I deal with an unproductive colleague in a small company?

Is it possible to create a QR code using text?

Watching something be piped to a file live with tail

What reasons are there for a Capitalist to oppose a 100% inheritance tax?

How to tell a function to use the default argument values?

Is there a hemisphere-neutral way of specifying a season?

What does the expression "A Mann!" means

What about the virus in 12 Monkeys?

How can saying a song's name be a copyright violation?

Why is this clock signal connected to a capacitor to gnd?

Different meanings of こわい

Expand and Contract



Inequality with log-sum


Impossible inequality : Dottie NumberA simple application of Jensen's inequalityTitan inequality for amateurInequality for amateursKaramata + Jensen = Niculescu's inequality (version of 1991)Hard inequality with condition ($xyz=1$)Inequality using JensenRefinement of a strong inequalityPower sum inequalityPower sum refinement inequality













1












$begingroup$


I'm interested by the following problem :




Let $a,b,c,d>0$ such that $a+b+c+d=4$ then we have :
$$abln(a)+bcln(b)+cdln(c)+daln(d)> -1.37$$




My try for $bgeq 3,aleq1,cleq 1,dleq1$:



We have the following inequality :




Let $varepsilon >0$ and $x>0$ then we have :
$$fracx(1-varepsilon)varepsilon-frac(x)^1-varepsilonvarepsilon e^varepsilonleq xln(x)$$




So we have to prove (here I take $varepsilon=0.001$):



$$fracab(1-varepsilon)varepsilon-fracb(a)^1-varepsilonvarepsilon e^varepsilon+fracbc(1-varepsilon)varepsilon-fracc(b)^1-varepsilonvarepsilon e^varepsilon+fraccd(1-varepsilon)varepsilon-fracd(c)^1-varepsilonvarepsilon e^varepsilon+fracda(1-varepsilon)varepsilon-fraca(d)^1-varepsilonvarepsilon e^varepsilon>-1.37$$



Now I use a form of Jensen's inequality :




Let $a,b,c,d>0$ such that $a+b+c+d=4$ and $bgeq 3,aleq1,cleq 1,dleq1$ then we have :
$$3.7(fracab+bc+cd+da3.7)^1-varepsilon>b(a)^1-varepsilon+c(b)^1-varepsilon+d(c)^1-varepsilon+a(d)^1-varepsilon$$




If we combine this two fact we have to prove :
$$frac(ab+bc+cd+da)(1-varepsilon)varepsilon-frac3.7(fracab+bc+cd+da3.7)^1-varepsilonvarepsilon e^varepsilon>-1.37$$



Wich is a one variable inequality because $$varepsilon=0.001$$



I have two questions :



How to complete my reasoning ?
How to prove this version of Jensen's inequality ?



Thanks in advance for your time .










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$
















    1












    $begingroup$


    I'm interested by the following problem :




    Let $a,b,c,d>0$ such that $a+b+c+d=4$ then we have :
    $$abln(a)+bcln(b)+cdln(c)+daln(d)> -1.37$$




    My try for $bgeq 3,aleq1,cleq 1,dleq1$:



    We have the following inequality :




    Let $varepsilon >0$ and $x>0$ then we have :
    $$fracx(1-varepsilon)varepsilon-frac(x)^1-varepsilonvarepsilon e^varepsilonleq xln(x)$$




    So we have to prove (here I take $varepsilon=0.001$):



    $$fracab(1-varepsilon)varepsilon-fracb(a)^1-varepsilonvarepsilon e^varepsilon+fracbc(1-varepsilon)varepsilon-fracc(b)^1-varepsilonvarepsilon e^varepsilon+fraccd(1-varepsilon)varepsilon-fracd(c)^1-varepsilonvarepsilon e^varepsilon+fracda(1-varepsilon)varepsilon-fraca(d)^1-varepsilonvarepsilon e^varepsilon>-1.37$$



    Now I use a form of Jensen's inequality :




    Let $a,b,c,d>0$ such that $a+b+c+d=4$ and $bgeq 3,aleq1,cleq 1,dleq1$ then we have :
    $$3.7(fracab+bc+cd+da3.7)^1-varepsilon>b(a)^1-varepsilon+c(b)^1-varepsilon+d(c)^1-varepsilon+a(d)^1-varepsilon$$




    If we combine this two fact we have to prove :
    $$frac(ab+bc+cd+da)(1-varepsilon)varepsilon-frac3.7(fracab+bc+cd+da3.7)^1-varepsilonvarepsilon e^varepsilon>-1.37$$



    Wich is a one variable inequality because $$varepsilon=0.001$$



    I have two questions :



    How to complete my reasoning ?
    How to prove this version of Jensen's inequality ?



    Thanks in advance for your time .










    share|cite|improve this question









    $endgroup$














      1












      1








      1





      $begingroup$


      I'm interested by the following problem :




      Let $a,b,c,d>0$ such that $a+b+c+d=4$ then we have :
      $$abln(a)+bcln(b)+cdln(c)+daln(d)> -1.37$$




      My try for $bgeq 3,aleq1,cleq 1,dleq1$:



      We have the following inequality :




      Let $varepsilon >0$ and $x>0$ then we have :
      $$fracx(1-varepsilon)varepsilon-frac(x)^1-varepsilonvarepsilon e^varepsilonleq xln(x)$$




      So we have to prove (here I take $varepsilon=0.001$):



      $$fracab(1-varepsilon)varepsilon-fracb(a)^1-varepsilonvarepsilon e^varepsilon+fracbc(1-varepsilon)varepsilon-fracc(b)^1-varepsilonvarepsilon e^varepsilon+fraccd(1-varepsilon)varepsilon-fracd(c)^1-varepsilonvarepsilon e^varepsilon+fracda(1-varepsilon)varepsilon-fraca(d)^1-varepsilonvarepsilon e^varepsilon>-1.37$$



      Now I use a form of Jensen's inequality :




      Let $a,b,c,d>0$ such that $a+b+c+d=4$ and $bgeq 3,aleq1,cleq 1,dleq1$ then we have :
      $$3.7(fracab+bc+cd+da3.7)^1-varepsilon>b(a)^1-varepsilon+c(b)^1-varepsilon+d(c)^1-varepsilon+a(d)^1-varepsilon$$




      If we combine this two fact we have to prove :
      $$frac(ab+bc+cd+da)(1-varepsilon)varepsilon-frac3.7(fracab+bc+cd+da3.7)^1-varepsilonvarepsilon e^varepsilon>-1.37$$



      Wich is a one variable inequality because $$varepsilon=0.001$$



      I have two questions :



      How to complete my reasoning ?
      How to prove this version of Jensen's inequality ?



      Thanks in advance for your time .










      share|cite|improve this question









      $endgroup$




      I'm interested by the following problem :




      Let $a,b,c,d>0$ such that $a+b+c+d=4$ then we have :
      $$abln(a)+bcln(b)+cdln(c)+daln(d)> -1.37$$




      My try for $bgeq 3,aleq1,cleq 1,dleq1$:



      We have the following inequality :




      Let $varepsilon >0$ and $x>0$ then we have :
      $$fracx(1-varepsilon)varepsilon-frac(x)^1-varepsilonvarepsilon e^varepsilonleq xln(x)$$




      So we have to prove (here I take $varepsilon=0.001$):



      $$fracab(1-varepsilon)varepsilon-fracb(a)^1-varepsilonvarepsilon e^varepsilon+fracbc(1-varepsilon)varepsilon-fracc(b)^1-varepsilonvarepsilon e^varepsilon+fraccd(1-varepsilon)varepsilon-fracd(c)^1-varepsilonvarepsilon e^varepsilon+fracda(1-varepsilon)varepsilon-fraca(d)^1-varepsilonvarepsilon e^varepsilon>-1.37$$



      Now I use a form of Jensen's inequality :




      Let $a,b,c,d>0$ such that $a+b+c+d=4$ and $bgeq 3,aleq1,cleq 1,dleq1$ then we have :
      $$3.7(fracab+bc+cd+da3.7)^1-varepsilon>b(a)^1-varepsilon+c(b)^1-varepsilon+d(c)^1-varepsilon+a(d)^1-varepsilon$$




      If we combine this two fact we have to prove :
      $$frac(ab+bc+cd+da)(1-varepsilon)varepsilon-frac3.7(fracab+bc+cd+da3.7)^1-varepsilonvarepsilon e^varepsilon>-1.37$$



      Wich is a one variable inequality because $$varepsilon=0.001$$



      I have two questions :



      How to complete my reasoning ?
      How to prove this version of Jensen's inequality ?



      Thanks in advance for your time .







      real-analysis logarithms jensen-inequality






      share|cite|improve this question













      share|cite|improve this question











      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question










      asked Mar 21 at 7:57









      max8128max8128

      231422




      231422




















          0






          active

          oldest

          votes












          Your Answer





          StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
          return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
          StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
          StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
          );
          );
          , "mathjax-editing");

          StackExchange.ready(function()
          var channelOptions =
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "69"
          ;
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
          createEditor();
          );

          else
          createEditor();

          );

          function createEditor()
          StackExchange.prepareEditor(
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
          convertImagesToLinks: true,
          noModals: true,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: 10,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          imageUploader:
          brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
          contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
          allowUrls: true
          ,
          noCode: true, onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          );



          );













          draft saved

          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function ()
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3156498%2finequality-with-log-sum%23new-answer', 'question_page');

          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown

























          0






          active

          oldest

          votes








          0






          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes















          draft saved

          draft discarded
















































          Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

          But avoid


          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

          Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




          draft saved


          draft discarded














          StackExchange.ready(
          function ()
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3156498%2finequality-with-log-sum%23new-answer', 'question_page');

          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown





















































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown

































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown







          Popular posts from this blog

          How should I support this large drywall patch? Planned maintenance scheduled April 23, 2019 at 00:00UTC (8:00pm US/Eastern) Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara Unicorn Meta Zoo #1: Why another podcast?How do I cover large gaps in drywall?How do I keep drywall around a patch from crumbling?Can I glue a second layer of drywall?How to patch long strip on drywall?Large drywall patch: how to avoid bulging seams?Drywall Mesh Patch vs. Bulge? To remove or not to remove?How to fix this drywall job?Prep drywall before backsplashWhat's the best way to fix this horrible drywall patch job?Drywall patching using 3M Patch Plus Primer

          random experiment with two different functions on unit interval Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara Planned maintenance scheduled April 23, 2019 at 00:00UTC (8:00pm US/Eastern)Random variable and probability space notionsRandom Walk with EdgesFinding functions where the increase over a random interval is Poisson distributedNumber of days until dayCan an observed event in fact be of zero probability?Unit random processmodels of coins and uniform distributionHow to get the number of successes given $n$ trials , probability $P$ and a random variable $X$Absorbing Markov chain in a computer. Is “almost every” turned into always convergence in computer executions?Stopped random walk is not uniformly integrable

          Lowndes Grove History Architecture References Navigation menu32°48′6″N 79°57′58″W / 32.80167°N 79.96611°W / 32.80167; -79.9661132°48′6″N 79°57′58″W / 32.80167°N 79.96611°W / 32.80167; -79.9661178002500"National Register Information System"Historic houses of South Carolina"Lowndes Grove""+32° 48' 6.00", −79° 57' 58.00""Lowndes Grove, Charleston County (260 St. Margaret St., Charleston)""Lowndes Grove"The Charleston ExpositionIt Happened in South Carolina"Lowndes Grove (House), Saint Margaret Street & Sixth Avenue, Charleston, Charleston County, SC(Photographs)"Plantations of the Carolina Low Countrye