Interpreting linear regression coefficients for a covariate that's correlated with other covariatesNonlinear regression with correlated errorsWhat is correlated with what in a linear regression?Correlated explanatory variables in linear regressionInterpreting linear regression.Interpreting OLS Regression Coefficients with High MulticolinearityMarkov chains with nonlinear predictor variablesLinear Regression CoefficientsLinear regression with integer functionConsistent estimator for linear regression without interceptLinear Regression and Ridge Regression

Is this Paypal Github SDK reference really a dangerous site?

How do I increase the number of TTY consoles?

Do black holes violate the conservation of mass?

Why does this boat have a landing pad? (SpaceX's GO Searcher) Any plans for propulsive capsule landings?

Is there stress on two letters on the word стоят

Strange opamp's output impedance in spice

Boss Telling direct supervisor I snitched

Sampling from Gaussian mixture models, when are the sampled data independent?

How to educate team mate to take screenshots for bugs with out unwanted stuff

ESPP--any reason not to go all in?

When an outsider describes family relationships, which point of view are they using?

When to use a QR code on a business card?

How can I portion out frozen cookie dough?

What do you call someone who likes to pick fights?

How can a demon take control of a human body during REM sleep?

PTIJ: Sport in the Torah

Which country has more?

How do you make a gun that shoots melee weapons and/or swords?

Under what conditions can the right to be silence be revoked in the USA?

Is it possible to clone a polymorphic object without manually adding overridden clone method into each derived class in C++?

Is there a way to make cleveref distinguish two environments with the same counter?

Short scifi story where reproductive organs are converted to produce "materials", pregnant protagonist is "found fit" to be a mother

How exactly does an Ethernet collision happen in the cable, since nodes use different circuits for Tx and Rx?

If nine coins are tossed, what is the probability that the number of heads is even?



Interpreting linear regression coefficients for a covariate that's correlated with other covariates


Nonlinear regression with correlated errorsWhat is correlated with what in a linear regression?Correlated explanatory variables in linear regressionInterpreting linear regression.Interpreting OLS Regression Coefficients with High MulticolinearityMarkov chains with nonlinear predictor variablesLinear Regression CoefficientsLinear regression with integer functionConsistent estimator for linear regression without interceptLinear Regression and Ridge Regression













0












$begingroup$


The interpretation of linear regression coefficients that I learned is that the coefficient is the change in outcome associated with a unit change in that covariate, assuming all other covariates stay the same. But if the other covariates can't stay the same, can I somehow control for that?



In this example, where the covariates we have available are functions of the population model constituents (X1 and X2), an increase in covar2 is associated with an increase in the outcome. But covar2 will have a negative coefficient because of its correlation with covar1.



n <- 10000
X1 = runif(n, 0, 1)
X2 = rnorm(n, 1, 0.5)
error <- rnorm(n, 0, 0.1)

covar1 = 0.8*X1 + 0.4*X2
covar2 = 0.75*X1

Y = X1 + X2 + error
summary(lm(Y ~ covar1 + covar2))


The coefficients are



covar1 2.50
covar2 -1.33


But I don't know how to derive meaning from them because their covariates can't vary independently. Can I say something like "controlling for covar1, a unit increase in covar2 is associated with an increase of <some number> in the outcome."? If so, how would I derive <some number>?










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$
















    0












    $begingroup$


    The interpretation of linear regression coefficients that I learned is that the coefficient is the change in outcome associated with a unit change in that covariate, assuming all other covariates stay the same. But if the other covariates can't stay the same, can I somehow control for that?



    In this example, where the covariates we have available are functions of the population model constituents (X1 and X2), an increase in covar2 is associated with an increase in the outcome. But covar2 will have a negative coefficient because of its correlation with covar1.



    n <- 10000
    X1 = runif(n, 0, 1)
    X2 = rnorm(n, 1, 0.5)
    error <- rnorm(n, 0, 0.1)

    covar1 = 0.8*X1 + 0.4*X2
    covar2 = 0.75*X1

    Y = X1 + X2 + error
    summary(lm(Y ~ covar1 + covar2))


    The coefficients are



    covar1 2.50
    covar2 -1.33


    But I don't know how to derive meaning from them because their covariates can't vary independently. Can I say something like "controlling for covar1, a unit increase in covar2 is associated with an increase of <some number> in the outcome."? If so, how would I derive <some number>?










    share|cite|improve this question









    $endgroup$














      0












      0








      0





      $begingroup$


      The interpretation of linear regression coefficients that I learned is that the coefficient is the change in outcome associated with a unit change in that covariate, assuming all other covariates stay the same. But if the other covariates can't stay the same, can I somehow control for that?



      In this example, where the covariates we have available are functions of the population model constituents (X1 and X2), an increase in covar2 is associated with an increase in the outcome. But covar2 will have a negative coefficient because of its correlation with covar1.



      n <- 10000
      X1 = runif(n, 0, 1)
      X2 = rnorm(n, 1, 0.5)
      error <- rnorm(n, 0, 0.1)

      covar1 = 0.8*X1 + 0.4*X2
      covar2 = 0.75*X1

      Y = X1 + X2 + error
      summary(lm(Y ~ covar1 + covar2))


      The coefficients are



      covar1 2.50
      covar2 -1.33


      But I don't know how to derive meaning from them because their covariates can't vary independently. Can I say something like "controlling for covar1, a unit increase in covar2 is associated with an increase of <some number> in the outcome."? If so, how would I derive <some number>?










      share|cite|improve this question









      $endgroup$




      The interpretation of linear regression coefficients that I learned is that the coefficient is the change in outcome associated with a unit change in that covariate, assuming all other covariates stay the same. But if the other covariates can't stay the same, can I somehow control for that?



      In this example, where the covariates we have available are functions of the population model constituents (X1 and X2), an increase in covar2 is associated with an increase in the outcome. But covar2 will have a negative coefficient because of its correlation with covar1.



      n <- 10000
      X1 = runif(n, 0, 1)
      X2 = rnorm(n, 1, 0.5)
      error <- rnorm(n, 0, 0.1)

      covar1 = 0.8*X1 + 0.4*X2
      covar2 = 0.75*X1

      Y = X1 + X2 + error
      summary(lm(Y ~ covar1 + covar2))


      The coefficients are



      covar1 2.50
      covar2 -1.33


      But I don't know how to derive meaning from them because their covariates can't vary independently. Can I say something like "controlling for covar1, a unit increase in covar2 is associated with an increase of <some number> in the outcome."? If so, how would I derive <some number>?







      regression linear-regression






      share|cite|improve this question













      share|cite|improve this question











      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question










      asked yesterday









      dgrogandgrogan

      1012




      1012




















          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          0












          $begingroup$

          When you make inference in regression analysis regarding the effect of an independent variable on the dependent, you usually (always) presume ceteris paribus, namely, when any other covariate remains unchanged (i.e., an analogue to partial derivative in calculus)
          https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ceteris_paribus#Economics.
          And "some number" is the coefficient, i.e., for the first covariate is $2.5$.






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$












          • $begingroup$
            What do you do when you know another covariate does not remain unchanged?
            $endgroup$
            – dgrogan
            20 hours ago










          Your Answer





          StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
          return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
          StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
          StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
          );
          );
          , "mathjax-editing");

          StackExchange.ready(function()
          var channelOptions =
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "69"
          ;
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
          createEditor();
          );

          else
          createEditor();

          );

          function createEditor()
          StackExchange.prepareEditor(
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
          convertImagesToLinks: true,
          noModals: true,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: 10,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          imageUploader:
          brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
          contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
          allowUrls: true
          ,
          noCode: true, onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          );



          );













          draft saved

          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function ()
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3140441%2finterpreting-linear-regression-coefficients-for-a-covariate-thats-correlated-wi%23new-answer', 'question_page');

          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown

























          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes








          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes









          0












          $begingroup$

          When you make inference in regression analysis regarding the effect of an independent variable on the dependent, you usually (always) presume ceteris paribus, namely, when any other covariate remains unchanged (i.e., an analogue to partial derivative in calculus)
          https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ceteris_paribus#Economics.
          And "some number" is the coefficient, i.e., for the first covariate is $2.5$.






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$












          • $begingroup$
            What do you do when you know another covariate does not remain unchanged?
            $endgroup$
            – dgrogan
            20 hours ago















          0












          $begingroup$

          When you make inference in regression analysis regarding the effect of an independent variable on the dependent, you usually (always) presume ceteris paribus, namely, when any other covariate remains unchanged (i.e., an analogue to partial derivative in calculus)
          https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ceteris_paribus#Economics.
          And "some number" is the coefficient, i.e., for the first covariate is $2.5$.






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$












          • $begingroup$
            What do you do when you know another covariate does not remain unchanged?
            $endgroup$
            – dgrogan
            20 hours ago













          0












          0








          0





          $begingroup$

          When you make inference in regression analysis regarding the effect of an independent variable on the dependent, you usually (always) presume ceteris paribus, namely, when any other covariate remains unchanged (i.e., an analogue to partial derivative in calculus)
          https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ceteris_paribus#Economics.
          And "some number" is the coefficient, i.e., for the first covariate is $2.5$.






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$



          When you make inference in regression analysis regarding the effect of an independent variable on the dependent, you usually (always) presume ceteris paribus, namely, when any other covariate remains unchanged (i.e., an analogue to partial derivative in calculus)
          https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ceteris_paribus#Economics.
          And "some number" is the coefficient, i.e., for the first covariate is $2.5$.







          share|cite|improve this answer












          share|cite|improve this answer



          share|cite|improve this answer










          answered yesterday









          V. VancakV. Vancak

          11.3k2926




          11.3k2926











          • $begingroup$
            What do you do when you know another covariate does not remain unchanged?
            $endgroup$
            – dgrogan
            20 hours ago
















          • $begingroup$
            What do you do when you know another covariate does not remain unchanged?
            $endgroup$
            – dgrogan
            20 hours ago















          $begingroup$
          What do you do when you know another covariate does not remain unchanged?
          $endgroup$
          – dgrogan
          20 hours ago




          $begingroup$
          What do you do when you know another covariate does not remain unchanged?
          $endgroup$
          – dgrogan
          20 hours ago

















          draft saved

          draft discarded
















































          Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

          But avoid


          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

          Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




          draft saved


          draft discarded














          StackExchange.ready(
          function ()
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3140441%2finterpreting-linear-regression-coefficients-for-a-covariate-thats-correlated-wi%23new-answer', 'question_page');

          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown





















































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown

































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown







          Popular posts from this blog

          Moe incest case Sentencing See also References Navigation menu"'Australian Josef Fritzl' fathered four children by daughter""Small town recoils in horror at 'Australian Fritzl' incest case""Victorian rape allegations echo Fritzl case - Just In (Australian Broadcasting Corporation)""Incest father jailed for 22 years""'Australian Fritzl' sentenced to 22 years in prison for abusing daughter for three decades""RSJ v The Queen"

          Who is our nearest planetary neighbor, on average?Santa Claus flies to the South PoleSeven Spheres of Unequal Mass, a weighing problem with a twistDescribe a large integerFast Mental Calculation of $7.5^7$Math in Space (without the help of celebrities)Find the value of $bigstar$: Puzzle 8 - InequalityWho drinks beer while running anyway?A Crucial DeliveryRanking And AverageHow long will my money last at roulette?

          Daza language Contents Vocabulary Phonology References External links Navigation menudaza1242Daza"Dazaga"eeee178086576