Basics of infinite-dimensional Lie algebrassome $vee$ notation in lie algebrasLie algebra, maximal toral sub-algebraLie algebra: Efficient way of finding commutation relationsKac's Infinite Dimensional Lie Algebras, Lemma 1.6Matrix representation of a 6-dimensional Lie algebraLie algebra generated by a setSemi simple Lie algebrasComplexification of a Lie AlgebrasHighest Weight, Cartan Matrix and representations of Lie AlgebrasWhy does Lie algebras constructed by generators and relations are usually infinite dimensional?

Why is there an extra space when I type "ls" on the Desktop?

Is there a logarithm base for which the logarithm becomes an identity function?

How to write a chaotic neutral protagonist and prevent my readers from thinking they are evil?

Computation logic of Partway in TikZ

Giving a career talk in my old university, how prominently should I tell students my salary?

Movie: boy escapes the real world and goes to a fantasy world with big furry trolls

Cycles on the torus

How do spaceships determine each other's mass in space?

Is divide-by-zero a security vulnerability?

Under what conditions can the right to be silence be revoked in the USA?

Writing text next to a table

Boss Telling direct supervisor I snitched

When an outsider describes family relationships, which point of view are they using?

If nine coins are tossed, what is the probability that the number of heads is even?

Can the Witch Sight warlock invocation see through the Mirror Image spell?

Help! My Character is too much for her story!

When to use a QR code on a business card?

Why does this boat have a landing pad? (SpaceX's GO Searcher) Any plans for propulsive capsule landings?

I can't die. Who am I?

Difference between `nmap local-IP-address` and `nmap localhost`

Use Mercury as quenching liquid for swords?

Why aren't there more Gauls like Obelix?

How can a demon take control of a human body during REM sleep?

How exactly does an Ethernet collision happen in the cable, since nodes use different circuits for Tx and Rx?



Basics of infinite-dimensional Lie algebras


some $vee$ notation in lie algebrasLie algebra, maximal toral sub-algebraLie algebra: Efficient way of finding commutation relationsKac's Infinite Dimensional Lie Algebras, Lemma 1.6Matrix representation of a 6-dimensional Lie algebraLie algebra generated by a setSemi simple Lie algebrasComplexification of a Lie AlgebrasHighest Weight, Cartan Matrix and representations of Lie AlgebrasWhy does Lie algebras constructed by generators and relations are usually infinite dimensional?













3












$begingroup$


I am a physicist with some background in the representation theory of finite-dimensional Lie algebras. Having now hard times with the very basics of the infinite-dimensional ones.



In most sources the infinite-dimensional Lie algebra is defined either by its generalised Cartan matrix (finite-sized) or via commutation relations between its simple roots (again, finite number). See e.g. wiki or any of the papers here.



We generate the rest of the algebra's elements by taking commutators of simple roots. For the finite-dimensional Lie algebras this process terminates at some point, and new commutators are no longer producing new (linearly independent of the ones obtained earlier) elements.



In the case of the infinite-dimensional algebras, we should be able to go infinitely far in this process.



Question 1 (see wiki for notations)



If for certain natural number $(1 - c_ij)$ we have
$$operatornamead^1-c_ij (e_i),e_j = 0 quad,$$
then how can we keep generating new elements infinitely? Looks like at some point this process should terminate, just as in the finite-dimensional case.



Question 1, rephrased



Why does relaxing the condition of positive definiteness of the Cartan matrix leads to such dramatic changes in the structure of the Lie algebra? What exactly change at the level of the commutation relations between $e_i, f_i, h_i$? (if it does change...)



Question 2



Some authors (page 13 here) write the commutation relations for the Kac-Moody and Virasoro algebras in the following way:



$$[T_m^a, T_n^b] = i f^ab_c T^c_m+n quad,$$
$$[L_m, L_n] = (m-n) L_m+n quad.$$



From these it's really obvious that one has the infinite number of linearly independent elements in the algebras. How can these form be translated to the language of the finite number of simple roots $e_i, f_i, h_i$?



Thanks.










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$
















    3












    $begingroup$


    I am a physicist with some background in the representation theory of finite-dimensional Lie algebras. Having now hard times with the very basics of the infinite-dimensional ones.



    In most sources the infinite-dimensional Lie algebra is defined either by its generalised Cartan matrix (finite-sized) or via commutation relations between its simple roots (again, finite number). See e.g. wiki or any of the papers here.



    We generate the rest of the algebra's elements by taking commutators of simple roots. For the finite-dimensional Lie algebras this process terminates at some point, and new commutators are no longer producing new (linearly independent of the ones obtained earlier) elements.



    In the case of the infinite-dimensional algebras, we should be able to go infinitely far in this process.



    Question 1 (see wiki for notations)



    If for certain natural number $(1 - c_ij)$ we have
    $$operatornamead^1-c_ij (e_i),e_j = 0 quad,$$
    then how can we keep generating new elements infinitely? Looks like at some point this process should terminate, just as in the finite-dimensional case.



    Question 1, rephrased



    Why does relaxing the condition of positive definiteness of the Cartan matrix leads to such dramatic changes in the structure of the Lie algebra? What exactly change at the level of the commutation relations between $e_i, f_i, h_i$? (if it does change...)



    Question 2



    Some authors (page 13 here) write the commutation relations for the Kac-Moody and Virasoro algebras in the following way:



    $$[T_m^a, T_n^b] = i f^ab_c T^c_m+n quad,$$
    $$[L_m, L_n] = (m-n) L_m+n quad.$$



    From these it's really obvious that one has the infinite number of linearly independent elements in the algebras. How can these form be translated to the language of the finite number of simple roots $e_i, f_i, h_i$?



    Thanks.










    share|cite|improve this question









    $endgroup$














      3












      3








      3


      1



      $begingroup$


      I am a physicist with some background in the representation theory of finite-dimensional Lie algebras. Having now hard times with the very basics of the infinite-dimensional ones.



      In most sources the infinite-dimensional Lie algebra is defined either by its generalised Cartan matrix (finite-sized) or via commutation relations between its simple roots (again, finite number). See e.g. wiki or any of the papers here.



      We generate the rest of the algebra's elements by taking commutators of simple roots. For the finite-dimensional Lie algebras this process terminates at some point, and new commutators are no longer producing new (linearly independent of the ones obtained earlier) elements.



      In the case of the infinite-dimensional algebras, we should be able to go infinitely far in this process.



      Question 1 (see wiki for notations)



      If for certain natural number $(1 - c_ij)$ we have
      $$operatornamead^1-c_ij (e_i),e_j = 0 quad,$$
      then how can we keep generating new elements infinitely? Looks like at some point this process should terminate, just as in the finite-dimensional case.



      Question 1, rephrased



      Why does relaxing the condition of positive definiteness of the Cartan matrix leads to such dramatic changes in the structure of the Lie algebra? What exactly change at the level of the commutation relations between $e_i, f_i, h_i$? (if it does change...)



      Question 2



      Some authors (page 13 here) write the commutation relations for the Kac-Moody and Virasoro algebras in the following way:



      $$[T_m^a, T_n^b] = i f^ab_c T^c_m+n quad,$$
      $$[L_m, L_n] = (m-n) L_m+n quad.$$



      From these it's really obvious that one has the infinite number of linearly independent elements in the algebras. How can these form be translated to the language of the finite number of simple roots $e_i, f_i, h_i$?



      Thanks.










      share|cite|improve this question









      $endgroup$




      I am a physicist with some background in the representation theory of finite-dimensional Lie algebras. Having now hard times with the very basics of the infinite-dimensional ones.



      In most sources the infinite-dimensional Lie algebra is defined either by its generalised Cartan matrix (finite-sized) or via commutation relations between its simple roots (again, finite number). See e.g. wiki or any of the papers here.



      We generate the rest of the algebra's elements by taking commutators of simple roots. For the finite-dimensional Lie algebras this process terminates at some point, and new commutators are no longer producing new (linearly independent of the ones obtained earlier) elements.



      In the case of the infinite-dimensional algebras, we should be able to go infinitely far in this process.



      Question 1 (see wiki for notations)



      If for certain natural number $(1 - c_ij)$ we have
      $$operatornamead^1-c_ij (e_i),e_j = 0 quad,$$
      then how can we keep generating new elements infinitely? Looks like at some point this process should terminate, just as in the finite-dimensional case.



      Question 1, rephrased



      Why does relaxing the condition of positive definiteness of the Cartan matrix leads to such dramatic changes in the structure of the Lie algebra? What exactly change at the level of the commutation relations between $e_i, f_i, h_i$? (if it does change...)



      Question 2



      Some authors (page 13 here) write the commutation relations for the Kac-Moody and Virasoro algebras in the following way:



      $$[T_m^a, T_n^b] = i f^ab_c T^c_m+n quad,$$
      $$[L_m, L_n] = (m-n) L_m+n quad.$$



      From these it's really obvious that one has the infinite number of linearly independent elements in the algebras. How can these form be translated to the language of the finite number of simple roots $e_i, f_i, h_i$?



      Thanks.







      representation-theory lie-algebras






      share|cite|improve this question













      share|cite|improve this question











      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question










      asked Oct 4 '16 at 6:01









      mavzolejmavzolej

      49228




      49228




















          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          1












          $begingroup$

          1) Because we can build words of arbitrary length (= roots of arbitrary height) by mixing generators. For example, for the simplest affine case $A_1^(1)$ (= affine $SU(2)$ algebra), we have $ad^3(e_1)e_2 = 0$, but $ad(e_2)ad^2(e_1)e_2 neq 0$ and in fact $[ad^2(e_2)ad^2(e_1)]^n e_2 neq 0$.



          2) The first set of commutation relations apply to the affine case (also known as affine Lie algebras) only, and they are missing the "level" term:
          beginequation
          [T_m^a, T_n^b] = if^ab_c T^c_m+n + delta_m,-n mk
          endequation



          In that case, you start with a finite-dimensional Lie algebra, written in terms of Chevalley relations as before (with $e_1...e_n$, etc.). You then distinguish a specific positive root $delta$ by $delta cdot alpha_i geq 0 forall i$. This root is unique.
          You append to this algebra a generator $e_0$ in such a way that the generalized Cartan matrix now has determinant 0 and rank n.
          The original simple roots $e_i, i=1...n$ map onto $T_0^alpha$ for $alpha$ chosen to be in the "positive" root space of the finite-dimensional algebra. The new simple root corresponds to $T^-delta_1$. Likewise the generators $f_i$ map to $T_0^-alpha$ and $T^delta_-1$. The central elements map to a subset of the $T_0^a$ in the center of the finite Lie algebra and to the "level" $k$.



          The way the Virasoro algebra enters into this is as quadratic terms in the universal enveloping algebra.






          share|cite|improve this answer











          $endgroup$












            Your Answer





            StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
            return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
            StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
            StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
            );
            );
            , "mathjax-editing");

            StackExchange.ready(function()
            var channelOptions =
            tags: "".split(" "),
            id: "69"
            ;
            initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

            StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
            // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
            if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
            StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
            createEditor();
            );

            else
            createEditor();

            );

            function createEditor()
            StackExchange.prepareEditor(
            heartbeatType: 'answer',
            autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
            convertImagesToLinks: true,
            noModals: true,
            showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
            reputationToPostImages: 10,
            bindNavPrevention: true,
            postfix: "",
            imageUploader:
            brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
            contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
            allowUrls: true
            ,
            noCode: true, onDemand: true,
            discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
            ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
            );



            );













            draft saved

            draft discarded


















            StackExchange.ready(
            function ()
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f1953083%2fbasics-of-infinite-dimensional-lie-algebras%23new-answer', 'question_page');

            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown

























            1 Answer
            1






            active

            oldest

            votes








            1 Answer
            1






            active

            oldest

            votes









            active

            oldest

            votes






            active

            oldest

            votes









            1












            $begingroup$

            1) Because we can build words of arbitrary length (= roots of arbitrary height) by mixing generators. For example, for the simplest affine case $A_1^(1)$ (= affine $SU(2)$ algebra), we have $ad^3(e_1)e_2 = 0$, but $ad(e_2)ad^2(e_1)e_2 neq 0$ and in fact $[ad^2(e_2)ad^2(e_1)]^n e_2 neq 0$.



            2) The first set of commutation relations apply to the affine case (also known as affine Lie algebras) only, and they are missing the "level" term:
            beginequation
            [T_m^a, T_n^b] = if^ab_c T^c_m+n + delta_m,-n mk
            endequation



            In that case, you start with a finite-dimensional Lie algebra, written in terms of Chevalley relations as before (with $e_1...e_n$, etc.). You then distinguish a specific positive root $delta$ by $delta cdot alpha_i geq 0 forall i$. This root is unique.
            You append to this algebra a generator $e_0$ in such a way that the generalized Cartan matrix now has determinant 0 and rank n.
            The original simple roots $e_i, i=1...n$ map onto $T_0^alpha$ for $alpha$ chosen to be in the "positive" root space of the finite-dimensional algebra. The new simple root corresponds to $T^-delta_1$. Likewise the generators $f_i$ map to $T_0^-alpha$ and $T^delta_-1$. The central elements map to a subset of the $T_0^a$ in the center of the finite Lie algebra and to the "level" $k$.



            The way the Virasoro algebra enters into this is as quadratic terms in the universal enveloping algebra.






            share|cite|improve this answer











            $endgroup$

















              1












              $begingroup$

              1) Because we can build words of arbitrary length (= roots of arbitrary height) by mixing generators. For example, for the simplest affine case $A_1^(1)$ (= affine $SU(2)$ algebra), we have $ad^3(e_1)e_2 = 0$, but $ad(e_2)ad^2(e_1)e_2 neq 0$ and in fact $[ad^2(e_2)ad^2(e_1)]^n e_2 neq 0$.



              2) The first set of commutation relations apply to the affine case (also known as affine Lie algebras) only, and they are missing the "level" term:
              beginequation
              [T_m^a, T_n^b] = if^ab_c T^c_m+n + delta_m,-n mk
              endequation



              In that case, you start with a finite-dimensional Lie algebra, written in terms of Chevalley relations as before (with $e_1...e_n$, etc.). You then distinguish a specific positive root $delta$ by $delta cdot alpha_i geq 0 forall i$. This root is unique.
              You append to this algebra a generator $e_0$ in such a way that the generalized Cartan matrix now has determinant 0 and rank n.
              The original simple roots $e_i, i=1...n$ map onto $T_0^alpha$ for $alpha$ chosen to be in the "positive" root space of the finite-dimensional algebra. The new simple root corresponds to $T^-delta_1$. Likewise the generators $f_i$ map to $T_0^-alpha$ and $T^delta_-1$. The central elements map to a subset of the $T_0^a$ in the center of the finite Lie algebra and to the "level" $k$.



              The way the Virasoro algebra enters into this is as quadratic terms in the universal enveloping algebra.






              share|cite|improve this answer











              $endgroup$















                1












                1








                1





                $begingroup$

                1) Because we can build words of arbitrary length (= roots of arbitrary height) by mixing generators. For example, for the simplest affine case $A_1^(1)$ (= affine $SU(2)$ algebra), we have $ad^3(e_1)e_2 = 0$, but $ad(e_2)ad^2(e_1)e_2 neq 0$ and in fact $[ad^2(e_2)ad^2(e_1)]^n e_2 neq 0$.



                2) The first set of commutation relations apply to the affine case (also known as affine Lie algebras) only, and they are missing the "level" term:
                beginequation
                [T_m^a, T_n^b] = if^ab_c T^c_m+n + delta_m,-n mk
                endequation



                In that case, you start with a finite-dimensional Lie algebra, written in terms of Chevalley relations as before (with $e_1...e_n$, etc.). You then distinguish a specific positive root $delta$ by $delta cdot alpha_i geq 0 forall i$. This root is unique.
                You append to this algebra a generator $e_0$ in such a way that the generalized Cartan matrix now has determinant 0 and rank n.
                The original simple roots $e_i, i=1...n$ map onto $T_0^alpha$ for $alpha$ chosen to be in the "positive" root space of the finite-dimensional algebra. The new simple root corresponds to $T^-delta_1$. Likewise the generators $f_i$ map to $T_0^-alpha$ and $T^delta_-1$. The central elements map to a subset of the $T_0^a$ in the center of the finite Lie algebra and to the "level" $k$.



                The way the Virasoro algebra enters into this is as quadratic terms in the universal enveloping algebra.






                share|cite|improve this answer











                $endgroup$



                1) Because we can build words of arbitrary length (= roots of arbitrary height) by mixing generators. For example, for the simplest affine case $A_1^(1)$ (= affine $SU(2)$ algebra), we have $ad^3(e_1)e_2 = 0$, but $ad(e_2)ad^2(e_1)e_2 neq 0$ and in fact $[ad^2(e_2)ad^2(e_1)]^n e_2 neq 0$.



                2) The first set of commutation relations apply to the affine case (also known as affine Lie algebras) only, and they are missing the "level" term:
                beginequation
                [T_m^a, T_n^b] = if^ab_c T^c_m+n + delta_m,-n mk
                endequation



                In that case, you start with a finite-dimensional Lie algebra, written in terms of Chevalley relations as before (with $e_1...e_n$, etc.). You then distinguish a specific positive root $delta$ by $delta cdot alpha_i geq 0 forall i$. This root is unique.
                You append to this algebra a generator $e_0$ in such a way that the generalized Cartan matrix now has determinant 0 and rank n.
                The original simple roots $e_i, i=1...n$ map onto $T_0^alpha$ for $alpha$ chosen to be in the "positive" root space of the finite-dimensional algebra. The new simple root corresponds to $T^-delta_1$. Likewise the generators $f_i$ map to $T_0^-alpha$ and $T^delta_-1$. The central elements map to a subset of the $T_0^a$ in the center of the finite Lie algebra and to the "level" $k$.



                The way the Virasoro algebra enters into this is as quadratic terms in the universal enveloping algebra.







                share|cite|improve this answer














                share|cite|improve this answer



                share|cite|improve this answer








                edited yesterday

























                answered Mar 6 at 20:22









                CraigCraig

                2,103819




                2,103819



























                    draft saved

                    draft discarded
















































                    Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


                    • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                    But avoid


                    • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                    • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

                    Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


                    To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                    draft saved


                    draft discarded














                    StackExchange.ready(
                    function ()
                    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f1953083%2fbasics-of-infinite-dimensional-lie-algebras%23new-answer', 'question_page');

                    );

                    Post as a guest















                    Required, but never shown





















































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown

































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown







                    Popular posts from this blog

                    How should I support this large drywall patch? Planned maintenance scheduled April 23, 2019 at 00:00UTC (8:00pm US/Eastern) Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara Unicorn Meta Zoo #1: Why another podcast?How do I cover large gaps in drywall?How do I keep drywall around a patch from crumbling?Can I glue a second layer of drywall?How to patch long strip on drywall?Large drywall patch: how to avoid bulging seams?Drywall Mesh Patch vs. Bulge? To remove or not to remove?How to fix this drywall job?Prep drywall before backsplashWhat's the best way to fix this horrible drywall patch job?Drywall patching using 3M Patch Plus Primer

                    random experiment with two different functions on unit interval Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara Planned maintenance scheduled April 23, 2019 at 00:00UTC (8:00pm US/Eastern)Random variable and probability space notionsRandom Walk with EdgesFinding functions where the increase over a random interval is Poisson distributedNumber of days until dayCan an observed event in fact be of zero probability?Unit random processmodels of coins and uniform distributionHow to get the number of successes given $n$ trials , probability $P$ and a random variable $X$Absorbing Markov chain in a computer. Is “almost every” turned into always convergence in computer executions?Stopped random walk is not uniformly integrable

                    Lowndes Grove History Architecture References Navigation menu32°48′6″N 79°57′58″W / 32.80167°N 79.96611°W / 32.80167; -79.9661132°48′6″N 79°57′58″W / 32.80167°N 79.96611°W / 32.80167; -79.9661178002500"National Register Information System"Historic houses of South Carolina"Lowndes Grove""+32° 48' 6.00", −79° 57' 58.00""Lowndes Grove, Charleston County (260 St. Margaret St., Charleston)""Lowndes Grove"The Charleston ExpositionIt Happened in South Carolina"Lowndes Grove (House), Saint Margaret Street & Sixth Avenue, Charleston, Charleston County, SC(Photographs)"Plantations of the Carolina Low Countrye