The inner structure of finite-dimensional $C^*$-algebrasTwo isomorphic finite-dimensional $C^*$-algebras with infinite eigenspacesSpatial tensor product of algebras and normed spacesConnection between Stinespring's factorization theorem and the spectral theorem for bounded operatorsFor a finite dimensional Hilbert space, is every automorphism “approximately inner”?$M_2(mathcalK(mathbbH)) cong mathcalK(mathbbH oplus mathbbH )$?$B$ stably finite simple $C^*$-algebra $Rightarrow$ $Botimes mathcalK$ contains no infinite projectionsminimal projections in finite dimensional von Neumann algebrastracial state on a unital infinite dimensional simple $C^*$ algebraTwo isomorphic $C^*$-algebras. What is the isomorphism between corresponding Hilbert spaces?Two isomorphic finite-dimensional $C^*$-algebras with infinite eigenspacesReference request unital normal *-homomorphisms $B(H) to B(K)$

What would be the most expensive material to an intergalactic society?

The (Easy) Road to Code

What does the Digital Threat scope actually do?

Can't make sense of a paragraph from Lovecraft

Is it appropriate to ask a former professor to order a book for me through an inter-library loan?

What can I do if someone tampers with my SSH public key?

What does *dead* mean in *What do you mean, dead?*?

How to install round brake pads

Does an unused member variable take up memory?

Smooth vector fields on a surface modulo diffeomorphisms

How can I portion out frozen cookie dough?

Too soon for a plot twist?

What is the purpose of a disclaimer like "this is not legal advice"?

How should I solve this integral with changing parameters?

Origin of the word “pushka”

Should we avoid writing fiction about historical events without extensive research?

Is this Paypal Github SDK reference really a dangerous site?

Giving a career talk in my old university, how prominently should I tell students my salary?

Difference between `nmap local-IP-address` and `nmap localhost`

How do we create new idioms and use them in a novel?

Writing text next to a table

What is Tony Stark injecting into himself in Iron Man 3?

How to educate team mate to take screenshots for bugs with out unwanted stuff

What is this tube in a jet engine's air intake?



The inner structure of finite-dimensional $C^*$-algebras


Two isomorphic finite-dimensional $C^*$-algebras with infinite eigenspacesSpatial tensor product of algebras and normed spacesConnection between Stinespring's factorization theorem and the spectral theorem for bounded operatorsFor a finite dimensional Hilbert space, is every automorphism “approximately inner”?$M_2(mathcalK(mathbbH)) cong mathcalK(mathbbH oplus mathbbH )$?$B$ stably finite simple $C^*$-algebra $Rightarrow$ $Botimes mathcalK$ contains no infinite projectionsminimal projections in finite dimensional von Neumann algebrastracial state on a unital infinite dimensional simple $C^*$ algebraTwo isomorphic $C^*$-algebras. What is the isomorphism between corresponding Hilbert spaces?Two isomorphic finite-dimensional $C^*$-algebras with infinite eigenspacesReference request unital normal *-homomorphisms $B(H) to B(K)$













1












$begingroup$


This is just to complete the questions about the inner structure of finite-dimensional $C^*$-algebras. Please correct the statements and help me with the appropriate links if it is not very difficult. Maybe I am wrong somewhere.



Let $H$ be a Hilbert space with a finite or countable basis. Let $mathscrA$ be a finite-dimensional unital $C^*$-algebra of operators acting on $H$. One of the diamonds, the Wedderburn theorem states that $mathscrA$ is a direct sum of simple matrix algebras
$$
mathscrAcongbigoplus_n=1^NmathbbC^m_ntimes m_n.
$$

But we need a bit more, namely the characterization of its inner structure in terms of unitary transformations of Hilbert spaces. Let $mathcalE^n_jj$ be the orthogonal projectors corresponding to the diagonal matrix units in $mathbbC^m_ntimes m_n$. I think that the following statements are true
$$
i) rm rank(mathcalE^n_11)=...=rm rank(mathcalE^n_m_nm_n), n=1,...,N;
$$

$$
ii) sum_n=1^Nm_nrm rank(mathcalE^n_11)=dim H.
$$

The ranks can be finite or infinite. Now, I think that the set of pairs of numbers
$$
rm struc(mathscrA)=(m_n,rm rank(mathcalE^n_11))_n=1^N
$$

is the complete characteristic of the inner structure of $mathscrA$. Namely, a unital $C^*$-alebra $mathscrA_1$ of operators acting on a Hilbert space $H_1$ has the same $rm struc(mathscrA)=rm struc(mathscrA_1)$ if and only if there is a unitary $mathcalU:Hto H_1$ such that $mathscrA_1=mathcalUmathscrAmathcalU^-1$. Moreover, for any finite set of pairs $ssubsetmathbbNtimesoverlinemathbbN$ there is a finite-dimensional unital $C^*$-algebra $mathscrA$ of operators acting on some Hilbert space such that $rm struc(mathscrA)=s$.



I think the idea of the Proof of this statement is the same as in the comment Two isomorphic finite-dimensional $C^*$-algebras with infinite eigenspaces or can be extracted from the Proof of Wedderburn theorem directly. I am sorry for the multiple more or less basic questions about the structure of $C^*$-algebras, but I know the people for whom this information can be useful.










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$
















    1












    $begingroup$


    This is just to complete the questions about the inner structure of finite-dimensional $C^*$-algebras. Please correct the statements and help me with the appropriate links if it is not very difficult. Maybe I am wrong somewhere.



    Let $H$ be a Hilbert space with a finite or countable basis. Let $mathscrA$ be a finite-dimensional unital $C^*$-algebra of operators acting on $H$. One of the diamonds, the Wedderburn theorem states that $mathscrA$ is a direct sum of simple matrix algebras
    $$
    mathscrAcongbigoplus_n=1^NmathbbC^m_ntimes m_n.
    $$

    But we need a bit more, namely the characterization of its inner structure in terms of unitary transformations of Hilbert spaces. Let $mathcalE^n_jj$ be the orthogonal projectors corresponding to the diagonal matrix units in $mathbbC^m_ntimes m_n$. I think that the following statements are true
    $$
    i) rm rank(mathcalE^n_11)=...=rm rank(mathcalE^n_m_nm_n), n=1,...,N;
    $$

    $$
    ii) sum_n=1^Nm_nrm rank(mathcalE^n_11)=dim H.
    $$

    The ranks can be finite or infinite. Now, I think that the set of pairs of numbers
    $$
    rm struc(mathscrA)=(m_n,rm rank(mathcalE^n_11))_n=1^N
    $$

    is the complete characteristic of the inner structure of $mathscrA$. Namely, a unital $C^*$-alebra $mathscrA_1$ of operators acting on a Hilbert space $H_1$ has the same $rm struc(mathscrA)=rm struc(mathscrA_1)$ if and only if there is a unitary $mathcalU:Hto H_1$ such that $mathscrA_1=mathcalUmathscrAmathcalU^-1$. Moreover, for any finite set of pairs $ssubsetmathbbNtimesoverlinemathbbN$ there is a finite-dimensional unital $C^*$-algebra $mathscrA$ of operators acting on some Hilbert space such that $rm struc(mathscrA)=s$.



    I think the idea of the Proof of this statement is the same as in the comment Two isomorphic finite-dimensional $C^*$-algebras with infinite eigenspaces or can be extracted from the Proof of Wedderburn theorem directly. I am sorry for the multiple more or less basic questions about the structure of $C^*$-algebras, but I know the people for whom this information can be useful.










    share|cite|improve this question











    $endgroup$














      1












      1








      1





      $begingroup$


      This is just to complete the questions about the inner structure of finite-dimensional $C^*$-algebras. Please correct the statements and help me with the appropriate links if it is not very difficult. Maybe I am wrong somewhere.



      Let $H$ be a Hilbert space with a finite or countable basis. Let $mathscrA$ be a finite-dimensional unital $C^*$-algebra of operators acting on $H$. One of the diamonds, the Wedderburn theorem states that $mathscrA$ is a direct sum of simple matrix algebras
      $$
      mathscrAcongbigoplus_n=1^NmathbbC^m_ntimes m_n.
      $$

      But we need a bit more, namely the characterization of its inner structure in terms of unitary transformations of Hilbert spaces. Let $mathcalE^n_jj$ be the orthogonal projectors corresponding to the diagonal matrix units in $mathbbC^m_ntimes m_n$. I think that the following statements are true
      $$
      i) rm rank(mathcalE^n_11)=...=rm rank(mathcalE^n_m_nm_n), n=1,...,N;
      $$

      $$
      ii) sum_n=1^Nm_nrm rank(mathcalE^n_11)=dim H.
      $$

      The ranks can be finite or infinite. Now, I think that the set of pairs of numbers
      $$
      rm struc(mathscrA)=(m_n,rm rank(mathcalE^n_11))_n=1^N
      $$

      is the complete characteristic of the inner structure of $mathscrA$. Namely, a unital $C^*$-alebra $mathscrA_1$ of operators acting on a Hilbert space $H_1$ has the same $rm struc(mathscrA)=rm struc(mathscrA_1)$ if and only if there is a unitary $mathcalU:Hto H_1$ such that $mathscrA_1=mathcalUmathscrAmathcalU^-1$. Moreover, for any finite set of pairs $ssubsetmathbbNtimesoverlinemathbbN$ there is a finite-dimensional unital $C^*$-algebra $mathscrA$ of operators acting on some Hilbert space such that $rm struc(mathscrA)=s$.



      I think the idea of the Proof of this statement is the same as in the comment Two isomorphic finite-dimensional $C^*$-algebras with infinite eigenspaces or can be extracted from the Proof of Wedderburn theorem directly. I am sorry for the multiple more or less basic questions about the structure of $C^*$-algebras, but I know the people for whom this information can be useful.










      share|cite|improve this question











      $endgroup$




      This is just to complete the questions about the inner structure of finite-dimensional $C^*$-algebras. Please correct the statements and help me with the appropriate links if it is not very difficult. Maybe I am wrong somewhere.



      Let $H$ be a Hilbert space with a finite or countable basis. Let $mathscrA$ be a finite-dimensional unital $C^*$-algebra of operators acting on $H$. One of the diamonds, the Wedderburn theorem states that $mathscrA$ is a direct sum of simple matrix algebras
      $$
      mathscrAcongbigoplus_n=1^NmathbbC^m_ntimes m_n.
      $$

      But we need a bit more, namely the characterization of its inner structure in terms of unitary transformations of Hilbert spaces. Let $mathcalE^n_jj$ be the orthogonal projectors corresponding to the diagonal matrix units in $mathbbC^m_ntimes m_n$. I think that the following statements are true
      $$
      i) rm rank(mathcalE^n_11)=...=rm rank(mathcalE^n_m_nm_n), n=1,...,N;
      $$

      $$
      ii) sum_n=1^Nm_nrm rank(mathcalE^n_11)=dim H.
      $$

      The ranks can be finite or infinite. Now, I think that the set of pairs of numbers
      $$
      rm struc(mathscrA)=(m_n,rm rank(mathcalE^n_11))_n=1^N
      $$

      is the complete characteristic of the inner structure of $mathscrA$. Namely, a unital $C^*$-alebra $mathscrA_1$ of operators acting on a Hilbert space $H_1$ has the same $rm struc(mathscrA)=rm struc(mathscrA_1)$ if and only if there is a unitary $mathcalU:Hto H_1$ such that $mathscrA_1=mathcalUmathscrAmathcalU^-1$. Moreover, for any finite set of pairs $ssubsetmathbbNtimesoverlinemathbbN$ there is a finite-dimensional unital $C^*$-algebra $mathscrA$ of operators acting on some Hilbert space such that $rm struc(mathscrA)=s$.



      I think the idea of the Proof of this statement is the same as in the comment Two isomorphic finite-dimensional $C^*$-algebras with infinite eigenspaces or can be extracted from the Proof of Wedderburn theorem directly. I am sorry for the multiple more or less basic questions about the structure of $C^*$-algebras, but I know the people for whom this information can be useful.







      c-star-algebras






      share|cite|improve this question















      share|cite|improve this question













      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question








      edited yesterday







      AAK

















      asked yesterday









      AAKAAK

      566




      566




















          0






          active

          oldest

          votes











          Your Answer





          StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
          return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
          StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
          StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
          );
          );
          , "mathjax-editing");

          StackExchange.ready(function()
          var channelOptions =
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "69"
          ;
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
          createEditor();
          );

          else
          createEditor();

          );

          function createEditor()
          StackExchange.prepareEditor(
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
          convertImagesToLinks: true,
          noModals: true,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: 10,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          imageUploader:
          brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
          contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
          allowUrls: true
          ,
          noCode: true, onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          );



          );













          draft saved

          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function ()
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3140537%2fthe-inner-structure-of-finite-dimensional-c-algebras%23new-answer', 'question_page');

          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown

























          0






          active

          oldest

          votes








          0






          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes















          draft saved

          draft discarded
















































          Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

          But avoid


          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

          Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




          draft saved


          draft discarded














          StackExchange.ready(
          function ()
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3140537%2fthe-inner-structure-of-finite-dimensional-c-algebras%23new-answer', 'question_page');

          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown





















































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown

































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown







          Popular posts from this blog

          Solar Wings Breeze Design and development Specifications (Breeze) References Navigation menu1368-485X"Hang glider: Breeze (Solar Wings)"e

          Kathakali Contents Etymology and nomenclature History Repertoire Songs and musical instruments Traditional plays Styles: Sampradayam Training centers and awards Relationship to other dance forms See also Notes References External links Navigation menueThe Illustrated Encyclopedia of Hinduism: A-MSouth Asian Folklore: An EncyclopediaRoutledge International Encyclopedia of Women: Global Women's Issues and KnowledgeKathakali Dance-drama: Where Gods and Demons Come to PlayKathakali Dance-drama: Where Gods and Demons Come to PlayKathakali Dance-drama: Where Gods and Demons Come to Play10.1353/atj.2005.0004The Illustrated Encyclopedia of Hinduism: A-MEncyclopedia of HinduismKathakali Dance-drama: Where Gods and Demons Come to PlaySonic Liturgy: Ritual and Music in Hindu Tradition"The Mirror of Gesture"Kathakali Dance-drama: Where Gods and Demons Come to Play"Kathakali"Indian Theatre: Traditions of PerformanceIndian Theatre: Traditions of PerformanceIndian Theatre: Traditions of PerformanceIndian Theatre: Traditions of PerformanceMedieval Indian Literature: An AnthologyThe Oxford Companion to Indian TheatreSouth Asian Folklore: An Encyclopedia : Afghanistan, Bangladesh, India, Nepal, Pakistan, Sri LankaThe Rise of Performance Studies: Rethinking Richard Schechner's Broad SpectrumIndian Theatre: Traditions of PerformanceModern Asian Theatre and Performance 1900-2000Critical Theory and PerformanceBetween Theater and AnthropologyKathakali603847011Indian Theatre: Traditions of PerformanceIndian Theatre: Traditions of PerformanceIndian Theatre: Traditions of PerformanceBetween Theater and AnthropologyBetween Theater and AnthropologyNambeesan Smaraka AwardsArchivedThe Cambridge Guide to TheatreRoutledge International Encyclopedia of Women: Global Women's Issues and KnowledgeThe Garland Encyclopedia of World Music: South Asia : the Indian subcontinentThe Ethos of Noh: Actors and Their Art10.2307/1145740By Means of Performance: Intercultural Studies of Theatre and Ritual10.1017/s204912550000100xReconceiving the Renaissance: A Critical ReaderPerformance TheoryListening to Theatre: The Aural Dimension of Beijing Opera10.2307/1146013Kathakali: The Art of the Non-WorldlyOn KathakaliKathakali, the dance theatreThe Kathakali Complex: Performance & StructureKathakali Dance-Drama: Where Gods and Demons Come to Play10.1093/obo/9780195399318-0071Drama and Ritual of Early Hinduism"In the Shadow of Hollywood Orientalism: Authentic East Indian Dancing"10.1080/08949460490274013Sanskrit Play Production in Ancient IndiaIndian Music: History and StructureBharata, the Nāṭyaśāstra233639306Table of Contents2238067286469807Dance In Indian Painting10.2307/32047833204783Kathakali Dance-Theatre: A Visual Narrative of Sacred Indian MimeIndian Classical Dance: The Renaissance and BeyondKathakali: an indigenous art-form of Keralaeee

          Method to test if a number is a perfect power? Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara Planned maintenance scheduled April 23, 2019 at 00:00UTC (8:00pm US/Eastern)Detecting perfect squares faster than by extracting square rooteffective way to get the integer sequence A181392 from oeisA rarely mentioned fact about perfect powersHow many numbers such $n$ are there that $n<100,lfloorsqrtn rfloor mid n$Check perfect squareness by modulo division against multiple basesFor what pair of integers $(a,b)$ is $3^a + 7^b$ a perfect square.Do there exist any positive integers $n$ such that $lfloore^nrfloor$ is a perfect power? What is the probability that one exists?finding perfect power factors of an integerProve that the sequence contains a perfect square for any natural number $m $ in the domain of $f$ .Counting Perfect Powers