The inner structure of finite-dimensional $C^*$-algebrasTwo isomorphic finite-dimensional $C^*$-algebras with infinite eigenspacesSpatial tensor product of algebras and normed spacesConnection between Stinespring's factorization theorem and the spectral theorem for bounded operatorsFor a finite dimensional Hilbert space, is every automorphism “approximately inner”?$M_2(mathcalK(mathbbH)) cong mathcalK(mathbbH oplus mathbbH )$?$B$ stably finite simple $C^*$-algebra $Rightarrow$ $Botimes mathcalK$ contains no infinite projectionsminimal projections in finite dimensional von Neumann algebrastracial state on a unital infinite dimensional simple $C^*$ algebraTwo isomorphic $C^*$-algebras. What is the isomorphism between corresponding Hilbert spaces?Two isomorphic finite-dimensional $C^*$-algebras with infinite eigenspacesReference request unital normal *-homomorphisms $B(H) to B(K)$

What would be the most expensive material to an intergalactic society?

The (Easy) Road to Code

What does the Digital Threat scope actually do?

Can't make sense of a paragraph from Lovecraft

Is it appropriate to ask a former professor to order a book for me through an inter-library loan?

What can I do if someone tampers with my SSH public key?

What does *dead* mean in *What do you mean, dead?*?

How to install round brake pads

Does an unused member variable take up memory?

Smooth vector fields on a surface modulo diffeomorphisms

How can I portion out frozen cookie dough?

Too soon for a plot twist?

What is the purpose of a disclaimer like "this is not legal advice"?

How should I solve this integral with changing parameters?

Origin of the word “pushka”

Should we avoid writing fiction about historical events without extensive research?

Is this Paypal Github SDK reference really a dangerous site?

Giving a career talk in my old university, how prominently should I tell students my salary?

Difference between `nmap local-IP-address` and `nmap localhost`

How do we create new idioms and use them in a novel?

Writing text next to a table

What is Tony Stark injecting into himself in Iron Man 3?

How to educate team mate to take screenshots for bugs with out unwanted stuff

What is this tube in a jet engine's air intake?



The inner structure of finite-dimensional $C^*$-algebras


Two isomorphic finite-dimensional $C^*$-algebras with infinite eigenspacesSpatial tensor product of algebras and normed spacesConnection between Stinespring's factorization theorem and the spectral theorem for bounded operatorsFor a finite dimensional Hilbert space, is every automorphism “approximately inner”?$M_2(mathcalK(mathbbH)) cong mathcalK(mathbbH oplus mathbbH )$?$B$ stably finite simple $C^*$-algebra $Rightarrow$ $Botimes mathcalK$ contains no infinite projectionsminimal projections in finite dimensional von Neumann algebrastracial state on a unital infinite dimensional simple $C^*$ algebraTwo isomorphic $C^*$-algebras. What is the isomorphism between corresponding Hilbert spaces?Two isomorphic finite-dimensional $C^*$-algebras with infinite eigenspacesReference request unital normal *-homomorphisms $B(H) to B(K)$













1












$begingroup$


This is just to complete the questions about the inner structure of finite-dimensional $C^*$-algebras. Please correct the statements and help me with the appropriate links if it is not very difficult. Maybe I am wrong somewhere.



Let $H$ be a Hilbert space with a finite or countable basis. Let $mathscrA$ be a finite-dimensional unital $C^*$-algebra of operators acting on $H$. One of the diamonds, the Wedderburn theorem states that $mathscrA$ is a direct sum of simple matrix algebras
$$
mathscrAcongbigoplus_n=1^NmathbbC^m_ntimes m_n.
$$

But we need a bit more, namely the characterization of its inner structure in terms of unitary transformations of Hilbert spaces. Let $mathcalE^n_jj$ be the orthogonal projectors corresponding to the diagonal matrix units in $mathbbC^m_ntimes m_n$. I think that the following statements are true
$$
i) rm rank(mathcalE^n_11)=...=rm rank(mathcalE^n_m_nm_n), n=1,...,N;
$$

$$
ii) sum_n=1^Nm_nrm rank(mathcalE^n_11)=dim H.
$$

The ranks can be finite or infinite. Now, I think that the set of pairs of numbers
$$
rm struc(mathscrA)=(m_n,rm rank(mathcalE^n_11))_n=1^N
$$

is the complete characteristic of the inner structure of $mathscrA$. Namely, a unital $C^*$-alebra $mathscrA_1$ of operators acting on a Hilbert space $H_1$ has the same $rm struc(mathscrA)=rm struc(mathscrA_1)$ if and only if there is a unitary $mathcalU:Hto H_1$ such that $mathscrA_1=mathcalUmathscrAmathcalU^-1$. Moreover, for any finite set of pairs $ssubsetmathbbNtimesoverlinemathbbN$ there is a finite-dimensional unital $C^*$-algebra $mathscrA$ of operators acting on some Hilbert space such that $rm struc(mathscrA)=s$.



I think the idea of the Proof of this statement is the same as in the comment Two isomorphic finite-dimensional $C^*$-algebras with infinite eigenspaces or can be extracted from the Proof of Wedderburn theorem directly. I am sorry for the multiple more or less basic questions about the structure of $C^*$-algebras, but I know the people for whom this information can be useful.










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$
















    1












    $begingroup$


    This is just to complete the questions about the inner structure of finite-dimensional $C^*$-algebras. Please correct the statements and help me with the appropriate links if it is not very difficult. Maybe I am wrong somewhere.



    Let $H$ be a Hilbert space with a finite or countable basis. Let $mathscrA$ be a finite-dimensional unital $C^*$-algebra of operators acting on $H$. One of the diamonds, the Wedderburn theorem states that $mathscrA$ is a direct sum of simple matrix algebras
    $$
    mathscrAcongbigoplus_n=1^NmathbbC^m_ntimes m_n.
    $$

    But we need a bit more, namely the characterization of its inner structure in terms of unitary transformations of Hilbert spaces. Let $mathcalE^n_jj$ be the orthogonal projectors corresponding to the diagonal matrix units in $mathbbC^m_ntimes m_n$. I think that the following statements are true
    $$
    i) rm rank(mathcalE^n_11)=...=rm rank(mathcalE^n_m_nm_n), n=1,...,N;
    $$

    $$
    ii) sum_n=1^Nm_nrm rank(mathcalE^n_11)=dim H.
    $$

    The ranks can be finite or infinite. Now, I think that the set of pairs of numbers
    $$
    rm struc(mathscrA)=(m_n,rm rank(mathcalE^n_11))_n=1^N
    $$

    is the complete characteristic of the inner structure of $mathscrA$. Namely, a unital $C^*$-alebra $mathscrA_1$ of operators acting on a Hilbert space $H_1$ has the same $rm struc(mathscrA)=rm struc(mathscrA_1)$ if and only if there is a unitary $mathcalU:Hto H_1$ such that $mathscrA_1=mathcalUmathscrAmathcalU^-1$. Moreover, for any finite set of pairs $ssubsetmathbbNtimesoverlinemathbbN$ there is a finite-dimensional unital $C^*$-algebra $mathscrA$ of operators acting on some Hilbert space such that $rm struc(mathscrA)=s$.



    I think the idea of the Proof of this statement is the same as in the comment Two isomorphic finite-dimensional $C^*$-algebras with infinite eigenspaces or can be extracted from the Proof of Wedderburn theorem directly. I am sorry for the multiple more or less basic questions about the structure of $C^*$-algebras, but I know the people for whom this information can be useful.










    share|cite|improve this question











    $endgroup$














      1












      1








      1





      $begingroup$


      This is just to complete the questions about the inner structure of finite-dimensional $C^*$-algebras. Please correct the statements and help me with the appropriate links if it is not very difficult. Maybe I am wrong somewhere.



      Let $H$ be a Hilbert space with a finite or countable basis. Let $mathscrA$ be a finite-dimensional unital $C^*$-algebra of operators acting on $H$. One of the diamonds, the Wedderburn theorem states that $mathscrA$ is a direct sum of simple matrix algebras
      $$
      mathscrAcongbigoplus_n=1^NmathbbC^m_ntimes m_n.
      $$

      But we need a bit more, namely the characterization of its inner structure in terms of unitary transformations of Hilbert spaces. Let $mathcalE^n_jj$ be the orthogonal projectors corresponding to the diagonal matrix units in $mathbbC^m_ntimes m_n$. I think that the following statements are true
      $$
      i) rm rank(mathcalE^n_11)=...=rm rank(mathcalE^n_m_nm_n), n=1,...,N;
      $$

      $$
      ii) sum_n=1^Nm_nrm rank(mathcalE^n_11)=dim H.
      $$

      The ranks can be finite or infinite. Now, I think that the set of pairs of numbers
      $$
      rm struc(mathscrA)=(m_n,rm rank(mathcalE^n_11))_n=1^N
      $$

      is the complete characteristic of the inner structure of $mathscrA$. Namely, a unital $C^*$-alebra $mathscrA_1$ of operators acting on a Hilbert space $H_1$ has the same $rm struc(mathscrA)=rm struc(mathscrA_1)$ if and only if there is a unitary $mathcalU:Hto H_1$ such that $mathscrA_1=mathcalUmathscrAmathcalU^-1$. Moreover, for any finite set of pairs $ssubsetmathbbNtimesoverlinemathbbN$ there is a finite-dimensional unital $C^*$-algebra $mathscrA$ of operators acting on some Hilbert space such that $rm struc(mathscrA)=s$.



      I think the idea of the Proof of this statement is the same as in the comment Two isomorphic finite-dimensional $C^*$-algebras with infinite eigenspaces or can be extracted from the Proof of Wedderburn theorem directly. I am sorry for the multiple more or less basic questions about the structure of $C^*$-algebras, but I know the people for whom this information can be useful.










      share|cite|improve this question











      $endgroup$




      This is just to complete the questions about the inner structure of finite-dimensional $C^*$-algebras. Please correct the statements and help me with the appropriate links if it is not very difficult. Maybe I am wrong somewhere.



      Let $H$ be a Hilbert space with a finite or countable basis. Let $mathscrA$ be a finite-dimensional unital $C^*$-algebra of operators acting on $H$. One of the diamonds, the Wedderburn theorem states that $mathscrA$ is a direct sum of simple matrix algebras
      $$
      mathscrAcongbigoplus_n=1^NmathbbC^m_ntimes m_n.
      $$

      But we need a bit more, namely the characterization of its inner structure in terms of unitary transformations of Hilbert spaces. Let $mathcalE^n_jj$ be the orthogonal projectors corresponding to the diagonal matrix units in $mathbbC^m_ntimes m_n$. I think that the following statements are true
      $$
      i) rm rank(mathcalE^n_11)=...=rm rank(mathcalE^n_m_nm_n), n=1,...,N;
      $$

      $$
      ii) sum_n=1^Nm_nrm rank(mathcalE^n_11)=dim H.
      $$

      The ranks can be finite or infinite. Now, I think that the set of pairs of numbers
      $$
      rm struc(mathscrA)=(m_n,rm rank(mathcalE^n_11))_n=1^N
      $$

      is the complete characteristic of the inner structure of $mathscrA$. Namely, a unital $C^*$-alebra $mathscrA_1$ of operators acting on a Hilbert space $H_1$ has the same $rm struc(mathscrA)=rm struc(mathscrA_1)$ if and only if there is a unitary $mathcalU:Hto H_1$ such that $mathscrA_1=mathcalUmathscrAmathcalU^-1$. Moreover, for any finite set of pairs $ssubsetmathbbNtimesoverlinemathbbN$ there is a finite-dimensional unital $C^*$-algebra $mathscrA$ of operators acting on some Hilbert space such that $rm struc(mathscrA)=s$.



      I think the idea of the Proof of this statement is the same as in the comment Two isomorphic finite-dimensional $C^*$-algebras with infinite eigenspaces or can be extracted from the Proof of Wedderburn theorem directly. I am sorry for the multiple more or less basic questions about the structure of $C^*$-algebras, but I know the people for whom this information can be useful.







      c-star-algebras






      share|cite|improve this question















      share|cite|improve this question













      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question








      edited yesterday







      AAK

















      asked yesterday









      AAKAAK

      566




      566




















          0






          active

          oldest

          votes











          Your Answer





          StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
          return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
          StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
          StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
          );
          );
          , "mathjax-editing");

          StackExchange.ready(function()
          var channelOptions =
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "69"
          ;
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
          createEditor();
          );

          else
          createEditor();

          );

          function createEditor()
          StackExchange.prepareEditor(
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
          convertImagesToLinks: true,
          noModals: true,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: 10,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          imageUploader:
          brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
          contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
          allowUrls: true
          ,
          noCode: true, onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          );



          );













          draft saved

          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function ()
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3140537%2fthe-inner-structure-of-finite-dimensional-c-algebras%23new-answer', 'question_page');

          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown

























          0






          active

          oldest

          votes








          0






          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes















          draft saved

          draft discarded
















































          Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

          But avoid


          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

          Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




          draft saved


          draft discarded














          StackExchange.ready(
          function ()
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3140537%2fthe-inner-structure-of-finite-dimensional-c-algebras%23new-answer', 'question_page');

          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown





















































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown

































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown







          Popular posts from this blog

          Lowndes Grove History Architecture References Navigation menu32°48′6″N 79°57′58″W / 32.80167°N 79.96611°W / 32.80167; -79.9661132°48′6″N 79°57′58″W / 32.80167°N 79.96611°W / 32.80167; -79.9661178002500"National Register Information System"Historic houses of South Carolina"Lowndes Grove""+32° 48' 6.00", −79° 57' 58.00""Lowndes Grove, Charleston County (260 St. Margaret St., Charleston)""Lowndes Grove"The Charleston ExpositionIt Happened in South Carolina"Lowndes Grove (House), Saint Margaret Street & Sixth Avenue, Charleston, Charleston County, SC(Photographs)"Plantations of the Carolina Low Countrye

          random experiment with two different functions on unit interval Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara Planned maintenance scheduled April 23, 2019 at 00:00UTC (8:00pm US/Eastern)Random variable and probability space notionsRandom Walk with EdgesFinding functions where the increase over a random interval is Poisson distributedNumber of days until dayCan an observed event in fact be of zero probability?Unit random processmodels of coins and uniform distributionHow to get the number of successes given $n$ trials , probability $P$ and a random variable $X$Absorbing Markov chain in a computer. Is “almost every” turned into always convergence in computer executions?Stopped random walk is not uniformly integrable

          How should I support this large drywall patch? Planned maintenance scheduled April 23, 2019 at 00:00UTC (8:00pm US/Eastern) Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara Unicorn Meta Zoo #1: Why another podcast?How do I cover large gaps in drywall?How do I keep drywall around a patch from crumbling?Can I glue a second layer of drywall?How to patch long strip on drywall?Large drywall patch: how to avoid bulging seams?Drywall Mesh Patch vs. Bulge? To remove or not to remove?How to fix this drywall job?Prep drywall before backsplashWhat's the best way to fix this horrible drywall patch job?Drywall patching using 3M Patch Plus Primer