Proof of continuity of a vector functionContinuity Property Proof CheckProof: Cauchy sequences and uniform continuityProving continuity of this Dirichlet functionContinuity limit of signam functionContinuity of a function for all pointsFunction maps Cauchy sequences to Cauchy sequences: prove uniform continuityShowing the continuity of a function based on the continuity of another functionMetric Spaces and ContinuityContinuity vs. Uniform Continuity in Layman's TermsReal Analysis: Function Continuity

Is there a way to make cleveref distinguish two environments with the same counter?

Factor Rings over Finite Fields

Computation logic of Partway in TikZ

Trocar background-image com delay via jQuery

What is better: yes / no radio, or simple checkbox?

If nine coins are tossed, what is the probability that the number of heads is even?

How to write a chaotic neutral protagonist and prevent my readers from thinking they are evil?

What does *dead* mean in *What do you mean, dead?*?

Do black holes violate the conservation of mass?

PTIJ: Who was the sixth set of priestly clothes for?

Does the US political system, in principle, allow for a no-party system?

School performs periodic password audits. Is my password compromised?

Is divide-by-zero a security vulnerability?

Is it a Cyclops number? "Nobody" knows!

Are all players supposed to be able to see each others' character sheets?

Either of .... (Plural/Singular)

Why restrict private health insurance?

Is "cogitate" used appropriately in "I cogitate that success relies on hard work"?

Will expression retain the same definition if particle is changed?

Called into a meeting and told we are being made redundant (laid off) and "not to share outside". Can I tell my partner?

Why do we say 'Pairwise Disjoint', rather than 'Disjoint'?

Has a sovereign Communist government ever run, and conceded loss, on a fair election?

Short scifi story where reproductive organs are converted to produce "materials", pregnant protagonist is "found fit" to be a mother

Is there a logarithm base for which the logarithm becomes an identity function?



Proof of continuity of a vector function


Continuity Property Proof CheckProof: Cauchy sequences and uniform continuityProving continuity of this Dirichlet functionContinuity limit of signam functionContinuity of a function for all pointsFunction maps Cauchy sequences to Cauchy sequences: prove uniform continuityShowing the continuity of a function based on the continuity of another functionMetric Spaces and ContinuityContinuity vs. Uniform Continuity in Layman's TermsReal Analysis: Function Continuity













0












$begingroup$



Let $f: mathbbR^m rightarrow mathbbR$. Show that $f(x) = x_i$ where $x_i$ is the $i^nd$ component of $x$ regarding the standard basis of $mathbbR^m$ is continuous in 0.




The definition says :




Let $A subset mathbbR^m$, $f: A rightarrow mathbbR^p$ and $a in A$. The function is continuous in a when for all $epsilon gt 0$, $exists delta gt 0$ such that for all $x in A$, $||x - a|| le delta$ and $|| f(x) - f(a) || le epsilon$.




I know $f(x) = (e_i|x)$.



By Cauchy-Schwarz inequality, we have : $|(e_i|x)| le ||e_i||.||x||$



We have $||x - 0|| = ||x|| le delta$.



So $||f(x) - f(0)|| le ||e_i||.||x|| - 0 = ||e_i||.||x||$



Now, for every $epsilon gt 0$ we can take $delta = fracepsilone_i$



So $||f(x) - f(0)|| le ||e_i||.||x|| le ||e_i||delta = ||e_i||fracepsilone_i = epsilon$.



I wonder if it's correct ?










share|cite|improve this question









New contributor




Mathieu Rousseau is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.







$endgroup$











  • $begingroup$
    Welcome to MSE. But this is not a definition of continuity, I'm afraid. It should go as something like: is continuous at $a$ when for each $epsilon>0$ there is $delta>0$ such that for all $xin A$ such that $lVert x-arVert<delta$ there holds $lVert f(x)-f(a)rVert<epsilon$.
    $endgroup$
    – user539887
    yesterday











  • $begingroup$
    Sorry I made a mistake in the definition. I corrected it.
    $endgroup$
    – Mathieu Rousseau
    20 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    Yes, it is O.K. When you use the standard Euclidean norm, then $lVert e_irVert=1$. But perhaps by $lVertcdotrVert$ you mean any arbitrary norm, then $lVert e_irVert$ need not be $1$. Incidentally, Cauchy-Schwarz inequality, not inegality.
    $endgroup$
    – user539887
    19 hours ago
















0












$begingroup$



Let $f: mathbbR^m rightarrow mathbbR$. Show that $f(x) = x_i$ where $x_i$ is the $i^nd$ component of $x$ regarding the standard basis of $mathbbR^m$ is continuous in 0.




The definition says :




Let $A subset mathbbR^m$, $f: A rightarrow mathbbR^p$ and $a in A$. The function is continuous in a when for all $epsilon gt 0$, $exists delta gt 0$ such that for all $x in A$, $||x - a|| le delta$ and $|| f(x) - f(a) || le epsilon$.




I know $f(x) = (e_i|x)$.



By Cauchy-Schwarz inequality, we have : $|(e_i|x)| le ||e_i||.||x||$



We have $||x - 0|| = ||x|| le delta$.



So $||f(x) - f(0)|| le ||e_i||.||x|| - 0 = ||e_i||.||x||$



Now, for every $epsilon gt 0$ we can take $delta = fracepsilone_i$



So $||f(x) - f(0)|| le ||e_i||.||x|| le ||e_i||delta = ||e_i||fracepsilone_i = epsilon$.



I wonder if it's correct ?










share|cite|improve this question









New contributor




Mathieu Rousseau is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.







$endgroup$











  • $begingroup$
    Welcome to MSE. But this is not a definition of continuity, I'm afraid. It should go as something like: is continuous at $a$ when for each $epsilon>0$ there is $delta>0$ such that for all $xin A$ such that $lVert x-arVert<delta$ there holds $lVert f(x)-f(a)rVert<epsilon$.
    $endgroup$
    – user539887
    yesterday











  • $begingroup$
    Sorry I made a mistake in the definition. I corrected it.
    $endgroup$
    – Mathieu Rousseau
    20 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    Yes, it is O.K. When you use the standard Euclidean norm, then $lVert e_irVert=1$. But perhaps by $lVertcdotrVert$ you mean any arbitrary norm, then $lVert e_irVert$ need not be $1$. Incidentally, Cauchy-Schwarz inequality, not inegality.
    $endgroup$
    – user539887
    19 hours ago














0












0








0





$begingroup$



Let $f: mathbbR^m rightarrow mathbbR$. Show that $f(x) = x_i$ where $x_i$ is the $i^nd$ component of $x$ regarding the standard basis of $mathbbR^m$ is continuous in 0.




The definition says :




Let $A subset mathbbR^m$, $f: A rightarrow mathbbR^p$ and $a in A$. The function is continuous in a when for all $epsilon gt 0$, $exists delta gt 0$ such that for all $x in A$, $||x - a|| le delta$ and $|| f(x) - f(a) || le epsilon$.




I know $f(x) = (e_i|x)$.



By Cauchy-Schwarz inequality, we have : $|(e_i|x)| le ||e_i||.||x||$



We have $||x - 0|| = ||x|| le delta$.



So $||f(x) - f(0)|| le ||e_i||.||x|| - 0 = ||e_i||.||x||$



Now, for every $epsilon gt 0$ we can take $delta = fracepsilone_i$



So $||f(x) - f(0)|| le ||e_i||.||x|| le ||e_i||delta = ||e_i||fracepsilone_i = epsilon$.



I wonder if it's correct ?










share|cite|improve this question









New contributor




Mathieu Rousseau is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.







$endgroup$





Let $f: mathbbR^m rightarrow mathbbR$. Show that $f(x) = x_i$ where $x_i$ is the $i^nd$ component of $x$ regarding the standard basis of $mathbbR^m$ is continuous in 0.




The definition says :




Let $A subset mathbbR^m$, $f: A rightarrow mathbbR^p$ and $a in A$. The function is continuous in a when for all $epsilon gt 0$, $exists delta gt 0$ such that for all $x in A$, $||x - a|| le delta$ and $|| f(x) - f(a) || le epsilon$.




I know $f(x) = (e_i|x)$.



By Cauchy-Schwarz inequality, we have : $|(e_i|x)| le ||e_i||.||x||$



We have $||x - 0|| = ||x|| le delta$.



So $||f(x) - f(0)|| le ||e_i||.||x|| - 0 = ||e_i||.||x||$



Now, for every $epsilon gt 0$ we can take $delta = fracepsilone_i$



So $||f(x) - f(0)|| le ||e_i||.||x|| le ||e_i||delta = ||e_i||fracepsilone_i = epsilon$.



I wonder if it's correct ?







real-analysis continuity vectors






share|cite|improve this question









New contributor




Mathieu Rousseau is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.











share|cite|improve this question









New contributor




Mathieu Rousseau is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited 16 hours ago







Mathieu Rousseau













New contributor




Mathieu Rousseau is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









asked yesterday









Mathieu RousseauMathieu Rousseau

62




62




New contributor




Mathieu Rousseau is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.





New contributor





Mathieu Rousseau is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.






Mathieu Rousseau is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.











  • $begingroup$
    Welcome to MSE. But this is not a definition of continuity, I'm afraid. It should go as something like: is continuous at $a$ when for each $epsilon>0$ there is $delta>0$ such that for all $xin A$ such that $lVert x-arVert<delta$ there holds $lVert f(x)-f(a)rVert<epsilon$.
    $endgroup$
    – user539887
    yesterday











  • $begingroup$
    Sorry I made a mistake in the definition. I corrected it.
    $endgroup$
    – Mathieu Rousseau
    20 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    Yes, it is O.K. When you use the standard Euclidean norm, then $lVert e_irVert=1$. But perhaps by $lVertcdotrVert$ you mean any arbitrary norm, then $lVert e_irVert$ need not be $1$. Incidentally, Cauchy-Schwarz inequality, not inegality.
    $endgroup$
    – user539887
    19 hours ago

















  • $begingroup$
    Welcome to MSE. But this is not a definition of continuity, I'm afraid. It should go as something like: is continuous at $a$ when for each $epsilon>0$ there is $delta>0$ such that for all $xin A$ such that $lVert x-arVert<delta$ there holds $lVert f(x)-f(a)rVert<epsilon$.
    $endgroup$
    – user539887
    yesterday











  • $begingroup$
    Sorry I made a mistake in the definition. I corrected it.
    $endgroup$
    – Mathieu Rousseau
    20 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    Yes, it is O.K. When you use the standard Euclidean norm, then $lVert e_irVert=1$. But perhaps by $lVertcdotrVert$ you mean any arbitrary norm, then $lVert e_irVert$ need not be $1$. Incidentally, Cauchy-Schwarz inequality, not inegality.
    $endgroup$
    – user539887
    19 hours ago
















$begingroup$
Welcome to MSE. But this is not a definition of continuity, I'm afraid. It should go as something like: is continuous at $a$ when for each $epsilon>0$ there is $delta>0$ such that for all $xin A$ such that $lVert x-arVert<delta$ there holds $lVert f(x)-f(a)rVert<epsilon$.
$endgroup$
– user539887
yesterday





$begingroup$
Welcome to MSE. But this is not a definition of continuity, I'm afraid. It should go as something like: is continuous at $a$ when for each $epsilon>0$ there is $delta>0$ such that for all $xin A$ such that $lVert x-arVert<delta$ there holds $lVert f(x)-f(a)rVert<epsilon$.
$endgroup$
– user539887
yesterday













$begingroup$
Sorry I made a mistake in the definition. I corrected it.
$endgroup$
– Mathieu Rousseau
20 hours ago




$begingroup$
Sorry I made a mistake in the definition. I corrected it.
$endgroup$
– Mathieu Rousseau
20 hours ago












$begingroup$
Yes, it is O.K. When you use the standard Euclidean norm, then $lVert e_irVert=1$. But perhaps by $lVertcdotrVert$ you mean any arbitrary norm, then $lVert e_irVert$ need not be $1$. Incidentally, Cauchy-Schwarz inequality, not inegality.
$endgroup$
– user539887
19 hours ago





$begingroup$
Yes, it is O.K. When you use the standard Euclidean norm, then $lVert e_irVert=1$. But perhaps by $lVertcdotrVert$ you mean any arbitrary norm, then $lVert e_irVert$ need not be $1$. Incidentally, Cauchy-Schwarz inequality, not inegality.
$endgroup$
– user539887
19 hours ago











0






active

oldest

votes











Your Answer





StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
);
);
, "mathjax-editing");

StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);

else
createEditor();

);

function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);



);






Mathieu Rousseau is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.









draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3140523%2fproof-of-continuity-of-a-vector-function%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























0






active

oldest

votes








0






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes








Mathieu Rousseau is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.









draft saved

draft discarded


















Mathieu Rousseau is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.












Mathieu Rousseau is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.











Mathieu Rousseau is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.














Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid


  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3140523%2fproof-of-continuity-of-a-vector-function%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

How should I support this large drywall patch? Planned maintenance scheduled April 23, 2019 at 00:00UTC (8:00pm US/Eastern) Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara Unicorn Meta Zoo #1: Why another podcast?How do I cover large gaps in drywall?How do I keep drywall around a patch from crumbling?Can I glue a second layer of drywall?How to patch long strip on drywall?Large drywall patch: how to avoid bulging seams?Drywall Mesh Patch vs. Bulge? To remove or not to remove?How to fix this drywall job?Prep drywall before backsplashWhat's the best way to fix this horrible drywall patch job?Drywall patching using 3M Patch Plus Primer

random experiment with two different functions on unit interval Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara Planned maintenance scheduled April 23, 2019 at 00:00UTC (8:00pm US/Eastern)Random variable and probability space notionsRandom Walk with EdgesFinding functions where the increase over a random interval is Poisson distributedNumber of days until dayCan an observed event in fact be of zero probability?Unit random processmodels of coins and uniform distributionHow to get the number of successes given $n$ trials , probability $P$ and a random variable $X$Absorbing Markov chain in a computer. Is “almost every” turned into always convergence in computer executions?Stopped random walk is not uniformly integrable

Lowndes Grove History Architecture References Navigation menu32°48′6″N 79°57′58″W / 32.80167°N 79.96611°W / 32.80167; -79.9661132°48′6″N 79°57′58″W / 32.80167°N 79.96611°W / 32.80167; -79.9661178002500"National Register Information System"Historic houses of South Carolina"Lowndes Grove""+32° 48' 6.00", −79° 57' 58.00""Lowndes Grove, Charleston County (260 St. Margaret St., Charleston)""Lowndes Grove"The Charleston ExpositionIt Happened in South Carolina"Lowndes Grove (House), Saint Margaret Street & Sixth Avenue, Charleston, Charleston County, SC(Photographs)"Plantations of the Carolina Low Countrye