How can a function(measure) be countably additive on a non sigma-ringLargest $sigma$-algebra on which an outer measure is countably additiveCountably additive map on an algebra.Existence of the Lebesgue measure, proof thereof.Extension of $sigma$-additive measure beyond Lebesgue-measurable sets.right continuous implies countably additiveCountably additive property of Lebesgue measuresigma-ring of sets generated by semiring, semiring closed under countable intersectionsAre measures always sigma-additive?Constructing a $sigma$-finite measure using measures of its subsetsCan Nedoma's pathology and other pathologies of larger measure spaces be avoided by changing the definition of sigma algebra?

Has a sovereign Communist government ever run, and conceded loss, on a fair election?

Having the player face themselves after the mid-game

Do black holes violate the conservation of mass?

Should we avoid writing fiction about historical events without extensive research?

Do Cubics always have one real root?

Why do phishing e-mails use faked e-mail addresses instead of the real one?

School performs periodic password audits. Is my password compromised?

If sound is a longitudinal wave, why can we hear it if our ears aren't aligned with the propagation direction?

Did Amazon pay $0 in taxes last year?

Short scifi story where reproductive organs are converted to produce "materials", pregnant protagonist is "found fit" to be a mother

What is this tube in a jet engine's air intake?

Called into a meeting and told we are being made redundant (laid off) and "not to share outside". Can I tell my partner?

Is there a way to make cleveref distinguish two environments with the same counter?

Is it appropriate to ask a former professor to order a book for me through an inter-library loan?

Professor forcing me to attend a conference, I can't afford even with 50% funding

Would those living in a "perfect society" not understand satire

Is it a Cyclops number? "Nobody" knows!

Are all players supposed to be able to see each others' character sheets?

Why do we say 'Pairwise Disjoint', rather than 'Disjoint'?

If nine coins are tossed, what is the probability that the number of heads is even?

Under what conditions can the right to remain silent be revoked in the USA?

Smooth vector fields on a surface modulo diffeomorphisms

Writing text next to a table

Which country has more?



How can a function(measure) be countably additive on a non sigma-ring


Largest $sigma$-algebra on which an outer measure is countably additiveCountably additive map on an algebra.Existence of the Lebesgue measure, proof thereof.Extension of $sigma$-additive measure beyond Lebesgue-measurable sets.right continuous implies countably additiveCountably additive property of Lebesgue measuresigma-ring of sets generated by semiring, semiring closed under countable intersectionsAre measures always sigma-additive?Constructing a $sigma$-finite measure using measures of its subsetsCan Nedoma's pathology and other pathologies of larger measure spaces be avoided by changing the definition of sigma algebra?













0












$begingroup$


I understand the definition of a sigma ring (the infinite unions of elements in ring is still in said ring)
And I believe I also understand the definition of countably additive. For elements in ring with the infinite union of elements also in said ring. Then the function satisfy ..ect. Then the function is countably additive.



What I’m confused about is doesn’t this require measures to only exist on sigma rings? Since rings in general don’t have closure for infinite unions. But I know this isn’t true, the ring (collection of all finite unions of disjoint intervals) is a ring and not a sigma ring but it has a lebesgue measure.



I don’t know what I’m not understanding correctly.










share|cite|improve this question









New contributor




Seth M is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.







$endgroup$







  • 1




    $begingroup$
    I have suppressed the tag "ring-theory" : it is not this kind of rings that are concerned by ring theory...
    $endgroup$
    – Jean Marie
    yesterday










  • $begingroup$
    Right. This is a set-theoretic ring not an algebraic structure.
    $endgroup$
    – GReyes
    yesterday










  • $begingroup$
    You can define $sigma$-additivity for a function $phi:DtoBbb R$ with arbitrary $Dsubseteq P(X)$, as whenever $bigcup_i A_iin D$ for countably many pairwise disjoint sets $A_iin D$, we have $phi(bigcup_i A_i) =sum_iphi(A_i)$.
    $endgroup$
    – Berci
    yesterday
















0












$begingroup$


I understand the definition of a sigma ring (the infinite unions of elements in ring is still in said ring)
And I believe I also understand the definition of countably additive. For elements in ring with the infinite union of elements also in said ring. Then the function satisfy ..ect. Then the function is countably additive.



What I’m confused about is doesn’t this require measures to only exist on sigma rings? Since rings in general don’t have closure for infinite unions. But I know this isn’t true, the ring (collection of all finite unions of disjoint intervals) is a ring and not a sigma ring but it has a lebesgue measure.



I don’t know what I’m not understanding correctly.










share|cite|improve this question









New contributor




Seth M is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.







$endgroup$







  • 1




    $begingroup$
    I have suppressed the tag "ring-theory" : it is not this kind of rings that are concerned by ring theory...
    $endgroup$
    – Jean Marie
    yesterday










  • $begingroup$
    Right. This is a set-theoretic ring not an algebraic structure.
    $endgroup$
    – GReyes
    yesterday










  • $begingroup$
    You can define $sigma$-additivity for a function $phi:DtoBbb R$ with arbitrary $Dsubseteq P(X)$, as whenever $bigcup_i A_iin D$ for countably many pairwise disjoint sets $A_iin D$, we have $phi(bigcup_i A_i) =sum_iphi(A_i)$.
    $endgroup$
    – Berci
    yesterday














0












0








0





$begingroup$


I understand the definition of a sigma ring (the infinite unions of elements in ring is still in said ring)
And I believe I also understand the definition of countably additive. For elements in ring with the infinite union of elements also in said ring. Then the function satisfy ..ect. Then the function is countably additive.



What I’m confused about is doesn’t this require measures to only exist on sigma rings? Since rings in general don’t have closure for infinite unions. But I know this isn’t true, the ring (collection of all finite unions of disjoint intervals) is a ring and not a sigma ring but it has a lebesgue measure.



I don’t know what I’m not understanding correctly.










share|cite|improve this question









New contributor




Seth M is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.







$endgroup$




I understand the definition of a sigma ring (the infinite unions of elements in ring is still in said ring)
And I believe I also understand the definition of countably additive. For elements in ring with the infinite union of elements also in said ring. Then the function satisfy ..ect. Then the function is countably additive.



What I’m confused about is doesn’t this require measures to only exist on sigma rings? Since rings in general don’t have closure for infinite unions. But I know this isn’t true, the ring (collection of all finite unions of disjoint intervals) is a ring and not a sigma ring but it has a lebesgue measure.



I don’t know what I’m not understanding correctly.







measure-theory lebesgue-measure






share|cite|improve this question









New contributor




Seth M is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.











share|cite|improve this question









New contributor




Seth M is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited yesterday









Jean Marie

30.6k42154




30.6k42154






New contributor




Seth M is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









asked yesterday









Seth MSeth M

11




11




New contributor




Seth M is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.





New contributor





Seth M is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.






Seth M is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.







  • 1




    $begingroup$
    I have suppressed the tag "ring-theory" : it is not this kind of rings that are concerned by ring theory...
    $endgroup$
    – Jean Marie
    yesterday










  • $begingroup$
    Right. This is a set-theoretic ring not an algebraic structure.
    $endgroup$
    – GReyes
    yesterday










  • $begingroup$
    You can define $sigma$-additivity for a function $phi:DtoBbb R$ with arbitrary $Dsubseteq P(X)$, as whenever $bigcup_i A_iin D$ for countably many pairwise disjoint sets $A_iin D$, we have $phi(bigcup_i A_i) =sum_iphi(A_i)$.
    $endgroup$
    – Berci
    yesterday













  • 1




    $begingroup$
    I have suppressed the tag "ring-theory" : it is not this kind of rings that are concerned by ring theory...
    $endgroup$
    – Jean Marie
    yesterday










  • $begingroup$
    Right. This is a set-theoretic ring not an algebraic structure.
    $endgroup$
    – GReyes
    yesterday










  • $begingroup$
    You can define $sigma$-additivity for a function $phi:DtoBbb R$ with arbitrary $Dsubseteq P(X)$, as whenever $bigcup_i A_iin D$ for countably many pairwise disjoint sets $A_iin D$, we have $phi(bigcup_i A_i) =sum_iphi(A_i)$.
    $endgroup$
    – Berci
    yesterday








1




1




$begingroup$
I have suppressed the tag "ring-theory" : it is not this kind of rings that are concerned by ring theory...
$endgroup$
– Jean Marie
yesterday




$begingroup$
I have suppressed the tag "ring-theory" : it is not this kind of rings that are concerned by ring theory...
$endgroup$
– Jean Marie
yesterday












$begingroup$
Right. This is a set-theoretic ring not an algebraic structure.
$endgroup$
– GReyes
yesterday




$begingroup$
Right. This is a set-theoretic ring not an algebraic structure.
$endgroup$
– GReyes
yesterday












$begingroup$
You can define $sigma$-additivity for a function $phi:DtoBbb R$ with arbitrary $Dsubseteq P(X)$, as whenever $bigcup_i A_iin D$ for countably many pairwise disjoint sets $A_iin D$, we have $phi(bigcup_i A_i) =sum_iphi(A_i)$.
$endgroup$
– Berci
yesterday





$begingroup$
You can define $sigma$-additivity for a function $phi:DtoBbb R$ with arbitrary $Dsubseteq P(X)$, as whenever $bigcup_i A_iin D$ for countably many pairwise disjoint sets $A_iin D$, we have $phi(bigcup_i A_i) =sum_iphi(A_i)$.
$endgroup$
– Berci
yesterday











1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















1












$begingroup$

You are mixing two things. For a measure to be countable additive you require that IF the countable union of disjoint measurable sets happens to be measurable then the measure of the union is the sum of the measures. For a sigma ring it is always the case that countable unions belong to the ring so you can dispense with the 'if'. But a general measure can be defined and even sigma additive over a more general substrate.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$












    Your Answer





    StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
    return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
    StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
    StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
    );
    );
    , "mathjax-editing");

    StackExchange.ready(function()
    var channelOptions =
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "69"
    ;
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
    createEditor();
    );

    else
    createEditor();

    );

    function createEditor()
    StackExchange.prepareEditor(
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
    convertImagesToLinks: true,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: 10,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader:
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    ,
    noCode: true, onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    );



    );






    Seth M is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.









    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function ()
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3140511%2fhow-can-a-functionmeasure-be-countably-additive-on-a-non-sigma-ring%23new-answer', 'question_page');

    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes








    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    1












    $begingroup$

    You are mixing two things. For a measure to be countable additive you require that IF the countable union of disjoint measurable sets happens to be measurable then the measure of the union is the sum of the measures. For a sigma ring it is always the case that countable unions belong to the ring so you can dispense with the 'if'. But a general measure can be defined and even sigma additive over a more general substrate.






    share|cite|improve this answer









    $endgroup$

















      1












      $begingroup$

      You are mixing two things. For a measure to be countable additive you require that IF the countable union of disjoint measurable sets happens to be measurable then the measure of the union is the sum of the measures. For a sigma ring it is always the case that countable unions belong to the ring so you can dispense with the 'if'. But a general measure can be defined and even sigma additive over a more general substrate.






      share|cite|improve this answer









      $endgroup$















        1












        1








        1





        $begingroup$

        You are mixing two things. For a measure to be countable additive you require that IF the countable union of disjoint measurable sets happens to be measurable then the measure of the union is the sum of the measures. For a sigma ring it is always the case that countable unions belong to the ring so you can dispense with the 'if'. But a general measure can be defined and even sigma additive over a more general substrate.






        share|cite|improve this answer









        $endgroup$



        You are mixing two things. For a measure to be countable additive you require that IF the countable union of disjoint measurable sets happens to be measurable then the measure of the union is the sum of the measures. For a sigma ring it is always the case that countable unions belong to the ring so you can dispense with the 'if'. But a general measure can be defined and even sigma additive over a more general substrate.







        share|cite|improve this answer












        share|cite|improve this answer



        share|cite|improve this answer










        answered yesterday









        GReyesGReyes

        1,82015




        1,82015




















            Seth M is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.









            draft saved

            draft discarded


















            Seth M is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.












            Seth M is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.











            Seth M is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.














            Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid


            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

            Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function ()
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3140511%2fhow-can-a-functionmeasure-be-countably-additive-on-a-non-sigma-ring%23new-answer', 'question_page');

            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            Popular posts from this blog

            How should I support this large drywall patch? Planned maintenance scheduled April 23, 2019 at 00:00UTC (8:00pm US/Eastern) Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara Unicorn Meta Zoo #1: Why another podcast?How do I cover large gaps in drywall?How do I keep drywall around a patch from crumbling?Can I glue a second layer of drywall?How to patch long strip on drywall?Large drywall patch: how to avoid bulging seams?Drywall Mesh Patch vs. Bulge? To remove or not to remove?How to fix this drywall job?Prep drywall before backsplashWhat's the best way to fix this horrible drywall patch job?Drywall patching using 3M Patch Plus Primer

            random experiment with two different functions on unit interval Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara Planned maintenance scheduled April 23, 2019 at 00:00UTC (8:00pm US/Eastern)Random variable and probability space notionsRandom Walk with EdgesFinding functions where the increase over a random interval is Poisson distributedNumber of days until dayCan an observed event in fact be of zero probability?Unit random processmodels of coins and uniform distributionHow to get the number of successes given $n$ trials , probability $P$ and a random variable $X$Absorbing Markov chain in a computer. Is “almost every” turned into always convergence in computer executions?Stopped random walk is not uniformly integrable

            Lowndes Grove History Architecture References Navigation menu32°48′6″N 79°57′58″W / 32.80167°N 79.96611°W / 32.80167; -79.9661132°48′6″N 79°57′58″W / 32.80167°N 79.96611°W / 32.80167; -79.9661178002500"National Register Information System"Historic houses of South Carolina"Lowndes Grove""+32° 48' 6.00", −79° 57' 58.00""Lowndes Grove, Charleston County (260 St. Margaret St., Charleston)""Lowndes Grove"The Charleston ExpositionIt Happened in South Carolina"Lowndes Grove (House), Saint Margaret Street & Sixth Avenue, Charleston, Charleston County, SC(Photographs)"Plantations of the Carolina Low Countrye