understanding of vector and point The Next CEO of Stack OverflowQuestion in Do Carmo 1-2Simple question regarding orthogonalityQuestion on Do CarmoClosest point of parameterized curve has orthogonal position vector to tangentDo we substitute the point in question in direction vector for parametric equation of 3d vectors?A question about parametrized differentiable curves.Problem understanding the indicatrix tangent definitionDifferential map of velocity vectorAbout the definition of curvatureStrong/weak tangents and limit positions, with rigor

How do I go from 300 unfinished/half written blog posts, to published posts?

Non-deterministic sum of floats

Indicator light circuit

What connection does MS Office have to Netscape Navigator?

Why did we only see the N-1 starfighters in one film?

What happened in Rome, when the western empire "fell"?

Why am I allowed to create multiple unique pointers from a single object?

How to invert MapIndexed on a ragged structure? How to construct a tree from rules?

How to solve a differential equation with a term to a power?

Does it take more energy to get to Venus or to Mars?

Why don't programming languages automatically manage the synchronous/asynchronous problem?

Sending manuscript to multiple publishers

Several mode to write the symbol of a vector

How to count occurrences of text in a file?

MessageLevel in QGIS3

Is it professional to write unrelated content in an almost-empty email?

Is there a way to save my career from absolute disaster?

What exact does MIB represent in SNMP? How is it different from OID?

Why didn't Khan get resurrected in the Genesis Explosion?

Between two walls

Can I equip Skullclamp on a creature I am sacrificing?

Rotate a column

Is HostGator storing my password in plaintext?

How do we know the LHC results are robust?



understanding of vector and point



The Next CEO of Stack OverflowQuestion in Do Carmo 1-2Simple question regarding orthogonalityQuestion on Do CarmoClosest point of parameterized curve has orthogonal position vector to tangentDo we substitute the point in question in direction vector for parametric equation of 3d vectors?A question about parametrized differentiable curves.Problem understanding the indicatrix tangent definitionDifferential map of velocity vectorAbout the definition of curvatureStrong/weak tangents and limit positions, with rigor










0












$begingroup$


I just have some confusions about basic understandings in vectors and points. For example, if $$alpha(t)=(x(t),y(t),z(t))$$ is a parametrized curve from $I$ to $mathbbR^3$, then for a specific point $t_0 in I$ , $alpha(t_0)$ represents a vector or a point in $mathbbR^3$ ? Why? I think $alpha(t_0)$ is a point on $mathbbR^3$, but I saw $alpha(t_0)$ described as a position vector in Do Carmo's book.
Thank you!










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$
















    0












    $begingroup$


    I just have some confusions about basic understandings in vectors and points. For example, if $$alpha(t)=(x(t),y(t),z(t))$$ is a parametrized curve from $I$ to $mathbbR^3$, then for a specific point $t_0 in I$ , $alpha(t_0)$ represents a vector or a point in $mathbbR^3$ ? Why? I think $alpha(t_0)$ is a point on $mathbbR^3$, but I saw $alpha(t_0)$ described as a position vector in Do Carmo's book.
    Thank you!










    share|cite|improve this question









    $endgroup$














      0












      0








      0





      $begingroup$


      I just have some confusions about basic understandings in vectors and points. For example, if $$alpha(t)=(x(t),y(t),z(t))$$ is a parametrized curve from $I$ to $mathbbR^3$, then for a specific point $t_0 in I$ , $alpha(t_0)$ represents a vector or a point in $mathbbR^3$ ? Why? I think $alpha(t_0)$ is a point on $mathbbR^3$, but I saw $alpha(t_0)$ described as a position vector in Do Carmo's book.
      Thank you!










      share|cite|improve this question









      $endgroup$




      I just have some confusions about basic understandings in vectors and points. For example, if $$alpha(t)=(x(t),y(t),z(t))$$ is a parametrized curve from $I$ to $mathbbR^3$, then for a specific point $t_0 in I$ , $alpha(t_0)$ represents a vector or a point in $mathbbR^3$ ? Why? I think $alpha(t_0)$ is a point on $mathbbR^3$, but I saw $alpha(t_0)$ described as a position vector in Do Carmo's book.
      Thank you!







      calculus differential-geometry






      share|cite|improve this question













      share|cite|improve this question











      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question










      asked Mar 18 at 19:32









      jf1997jf1997

      32




      32




















          2 Answers
          2






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          0












          $begingroup$

          Assuming you are given a coordinate system in $R^3$, there exist a "one to one correspondence" between the set of all points in $R^3$ and the set of three dimensional vectors. So we can interpret the $alpha(t)= (x(t), y(t), z(t))$, for each t, to be either a point or the vector that, if we were to have its base at (0, 0, 0) would have its tip at the point (x(t), y(t), z(t)).



          I am not saying that points and vector are the same thing! For example, given the vector (x, y, z), which would represent the vector with end at (0, 0, 0) and tip at the point (x, y, z), we can [b]move[/b] that vector so that its end is at (a, b, c) and its tip is at (a+ x, b+ y, c+ z) but it is the same vector. You can move vectors but you can't move points.



          (Some texts use for vectors specifically to distinguish vectors from points (x, y, z).)






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$




















            0












            $begingroup$

            The idea is that some things are essentially the same in mathematics -- isomorphic is the term of art.



            This is also the case with vectors and points in Euclidean space. In particular, if we always take the position vector (i.e., those originating at the origin of coordinates) as the representative of each equivalence class of vectors, then there is an isomorphism between the points and vectors of that space, so that we may regard them as essentially the same thing.



            How we think of them in a particular case would depend on which is more convenient for the problem at hand.



            By the way, note that there is a difference between a curve and its trace.






            share|cite|improve this answer









            $endgroup$













              Your Answer





              StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
              return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
              StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
              StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
              );
              );
              , "mathjax-editing");

              StackExchange.ready(function()
              var channelOptions =
              tags: "".split(" "),
              id: "69"
              ;
              initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

              StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
              // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
              if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
              StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
              createEditor();
              );

              else
              createEditor();

              );

              function createEditor()
              StackExchange.prepareEditor(
              heartbeatType: 'answer',
              autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
              convertImagesToLinks: true,
              noModals: true,
              showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
              reputationToPostImages: 10,
              bindNavPrevention: true,
              postfix: "",
              imageUploader:
              brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
              contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
              allowUrls: true
              ,
              noCode: true, onDemand: true,
              discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
              ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
              );



              );













              draft saved

              draft discarded


















              StackExchange.ready(
              function ()
              StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3153206%2funderstanding-of-vector-and-point%23new-answer', 'question_page');

              );

              Post as a guest















              Required, but never shown

























              2 Answers
              2






              active

              oldest

              votes








              2 Answers
              2






              active

              oldest

              votes









              active

              oldest

              votes






              active

              oldest

              votes









              0












              $begingroup$

              Assuming you are given a coordinate system in $R^3$, there exist a "one to one correspondence" between the set of all points in $R^3$ and the set of three dimensional vectors. So we can interpret the $alpha(t)= (x(t), y(t), z(t))$, for each t, to be either a point or the vector that, if we were to have its base at (0, 0, 0) would have its tip at the point (x(t), y(t), z(t)).



              I am not saying that points and vector are the same thing! For example, given the vector (x, y, z), which would represent the vector with end at (0, 0, 0) and tip at the point (x, y, z), we can [b]move[/b] that vector so that its end is at (a, b, c) and its tip is at (a+ x, b+ y, c+ z) but it is the same vector. You can move vectors but you can't move points.



              (Some texts use for vectors specifically to distinguish vectors from points (x, y, z).)






              share|cite|improve this answer









              $endgroup$

















                0












                $begingroup$

                Assuming you are given a coordinate system in $R^3$, there exist a "one to one correspondence" between the set of all points in $R^3$ and the set of three dimensional vectors. So we can interpret the $alpha(t)= (x(t), y(t), z(t))$, for each t, to be either a point or the vector that, if we were to have its base at (0, 0, 0) would have its tip at the point (x(t), y(t), z(t)).



                I am not saying that points and vector are the same thing! For example, given the vector (x, y, z), which would represent the vector with end at (0, 0, 0) and tip at the point (x, y, z), we can [b]move[/b] that vector so that its end is at (a, b, c) and its tip is at (a+ x, b+ y, c+ z) but it is the same vector. You can move vectors but you can't move points.



                (Some texts use for vectors specifically to distinguish vectors from points (x, y, z).)






                share|cite|improve this answer









                $endgroup$















                  0












                  0








                  0





                  $begingroup$

                  Assuming you are given a coordinate system in $R^3$, there exist a "one to one correspondence" between the set of all points in $R^3$ and the set of three dimensional vectors. So we can interpret the $alpha(t)= (x(t), y(t), z(t))$, for each t, to be either a point or the vector that, if we were to have its base at (0, 0, 0) would have its tip at the point (x(t), y(t), z(t)).



                  I am not saying that points and vector are the same thing! For example, given the vector (x, y, z), which would represent the vector with end at (0, 0, 0) and tip at the point (x, y, z), we can [b]move[/b] that vector so that its end is at (a, b, c) and its tip is at (a+ x, b+ y, c+ z) but it is the same vector. You can move vectors but you can't move points.



                  (Some texts use for vectors specifically to distinguish vectors from points (x, y, z).)






                  share|cite|improve this answer









                  $endgroup$



                  Assuming you are given a coordinate system in $R^3$, there exist a "one to one correspondence" between the set of all points in $R^3$ and the set of three dimensional vectors. So we can interpret the $alpha(t)= (x(t), y(t), z(t))$, for each t, to be either a point or the vector that, if we were to have its base at (0, 0, 0) would have its tip at the point (x(t), y(t), z(t)).



                  I am not saying that points and vector are the same thing! For example, given the vector (x, y, z), which would represent the vector with end at (0, 0, 0) and tip at the point (x, y, z), we can [b]move[/b] that vector so that its end is at (a, b, c) and its tip is at (a+ x, b+ y, c+ z) but it is the same vector. You can move vectors but you can't move points.



                  (Some texts use for vectors specifically to distinguish vectors from points (x, y, z).)







                  share|cite|improve this answer












                  share|cite|improve this answer



                  share|cite|improve this answer










                  answered Mar 18 at 19:51









                  user247327user247327

                  11.6k1516




                  11.6k1516





















                      0












                      $begingroup$

                      The idea is that some things are essentially the same in mathematics -- isomorphic is the term of art.



                      This is also the case with vectors and points in Euclidean space. In particular, if we always take the position vector (i.e., those originating at the origin of coordinates) as the representative of each equivalence class of vectors, then there is an isomorphism between the points and vectors of that space, so that we may regard them as essentially the same thing.



                      How we think of them in a particular case would depend on which is more convenient for the problem at hand.



                      By the way, note that there is a difference between a curve and its trace.






                      share|cite|improve this answer









                      $endgroup$

















                        0












                        $begingroup$

                        The idea is that some things are essentially the same in mathematics -- isomorphic is the term of art.



                        This is also the case with vectors and points in Euclidean space. In particular, if we always take the position vector (i.e., those originating at the origin of coordinates) as the representative of each equivalence class of vectors, then there is an isomorphism between the points and vectors of that space, so that we may regard them as essentially the same thing.



                        How we think of them in a particular case would depend on which is more convenient for the problem at hand.



                        By the way, note that there is a difference between a curve and its trace.






                        share|cite|improve this answer









                        $endgroup$















                          0












                          0








                          0





                          $begingroup$

                          The idea is that some things are essentially the same in mathematics -- isomorphic is the term of art.



                          This is also the case with vectors and points in Euclidean space. In particular, if we always take the position vector (i.e., those originating at the origin of coordinates) as the representative of each equivalence class of vectors, then there is an isomorphism between the points and vectors of that space, so that we may regard them as essentially the same thing.



                          How we think of them in a particular case would depend on which is more convenient for the problem at hand.



                          By the way, note that there is a difference between a curve and its trace.






                          share|cite|improve this answer









                          $endgroup$



                          The idea is that some things are essentially the same in mathematics -- isomorphic is the term of art.



                          This is also the case with vectors and points in Euclidean space. In particular, if we always take the position vector (i.e., those originating at the origin of coordinates) as the representative of each equivalence class of vectors, then there is an isomorphism between the points and vectors of that space, so that we may regard them as essentially the same thing.



                          How we think of them in a particular case would depend on which is more convenient for the problem at hand.



                          By the way, note that there is a difference between a curve and its trace.







                          share|cite|improve this answer












                          share|cite|improve this answer



                          share|cite|improve this answer










                          answered Mar 18 at 20:11









                          AllawonderAllawonder

                          1




                          1



























                              draft saved

                              draft discarded
















































                              Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


                              • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                              But avoid


                              • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                              • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

                              Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


                              To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                              draft saved


                              draft discarded














                              StackExchange.ready(
                              function ()
                              StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3153206%2funderstanding-of-vector-and-point%23new-answer', 'question_page');

                              );

                              Post as a guest















                              Required, but never shown





















































                              Required, but never shown














                              Required, but never shown












                              Required, but never shown







                              Required, but never shown

































                              Required, but never shown














                              Required, but never shown












                              Required, but never shown







                              Required, but never shown







                              Popular posts from this blog

                              Moe incest case Sentencing See also References Navigation menu"'Australian Josef Fritzl' fathered four children by daughter""Small town recoils in horror at 'Australian Fritzl' incest case""Victorian rape allegations echo Fritzl case - Just In (Australian Broadcasting Corporation)""Incest father jailed for 22 years""'Australian Fritzl' sentenced to 22 years in prison for abusing daughter for three decades""RSJ v The Queen"

                              Who is our nearest planetary neighbor, on average?Santa Claus flies to the South PoleSeven Spheres of Unequal Mass, a weighing problem with a twistDescribe a large integerFast Mental Calculation of $7.5^7$Math in Space (without the help of celebrities)Find the value of $bigstar$: Puzzle 8 - InequalityWho drinks beer while running anyway?A Crucial DeliveryRanking And AverageHow long will my money last at roulette?

                              Daza language Contents Vocabulary Phonology References External links Navigation menudaza1242Daza"Dazaga"eeee178086576