Showing the convergence in probabilty of two Ito integrals The Next CEO of Stack OverflowConvergence in $L_1$ and Convergence of the IntegralsQuestions about expectation of stochastic integralsComputing an Ito Integral using the DefinitionFinding a probability measure such that the time-shifted Brownian motion is also a Brownian motionAre Ito Integrals adapted to the Brownian Motion FiltrationHelp with change of measure and martingalesAre there examples where these two stochastic integrals are not independent?Convergence of Stochastic IntegralIto isometry with two independent Brownian motionsAre Ito Integrals adapted to the Brownian Motion Filtration 2
Between two walls
What happens if you roll doubles 3 times then land on "Go to jail?"
Can we say or write : "No, it'sn't"?
Non-deterministic sum of floats
Make solar eclipses exceedingly rare, but still have new moons
How did the Bene Gesserit know how to make a Kwisatz Haderach?
How to invert MapIndexed on a ragged structure? How to construct a tree from rules?
Parametric curve length - calculus
RegionPlot of annulus gives a mesh
How fast would a person need to move to trick the eye?
How to Reset Passwords on Multiple Websites Easily?
Can I run my washing machine drain line into a condensate pump so it drains better?
I believe this to be a fraud - hired, then asked to cash check and send cash as Bitcoin
How to start emacs in "nothing" mode (`fundamental-mode`)
How to avoid supervisors with prejudiced views?
What benefits would be gained by using human laborers instead of drones in deep sea mining?
What exact does MIB represent in SNMP? How is it different from OID?
Would a galaxy be visible from outside, but nearby?
Interfacing a button to MCU (and PC) with 50m long cable
Unreliable Magic - Is it worth it?
Written every which way
Can you replace a racial trait cantrip when leveling up?
What is the result of assigning to std::vector<T>::begin()?
How do we know the LHC results are robust?
Showing the convergence in probabilty of two Ito integrals
The Next CEO of Stack OverflowConvergence in $L_1$ and Convergence of the IntegralsQuestions about expectation of stochastic integralsComputing an Ito Integral using the DefinitionFinding a probability measure such that the time-shifted Brownian motion is also a Brownian motionAre Ito Integrals adapted to the Brownian Motion FiltrationHelp with change of measure and martingalesAre there examples where these two stochastic integrals are not independent?Convergence of Stochastic IntegralIto isometry with two independent Brownian motionsAre Ito Integrals adapted to the Brownian Motion Filtration 2
$begingroup$
Consider a Brownian Motion, $B(t)$, which are all $mathcal F_t$ measurable. Let $f,f_n$ be in $L_ad^2[a,b] times Omega$, which are the set of stochastic processes that are adapted to the filtration $mathcal F_t$ and satisfy $int_a^bEleft(f(t)^2right)dt < infty$. Suppose that $int_a^b|f(t)-f_n(t)|dtto0$ almost surely. Prove that $int_a^bf_n(t)dB(t) to int_a^bf_n(t)dB(t)$ in probability.
I am trying to show this two different ways. First by using $L^2$ convergence which will then imply convergence in probability. What I have for this way is the following:
Since $f$ and $f_n$ are in $L_ad^2$ then the ito integral $int_a^bf(t)-f_n(t)dB(t)$ exists and $Eleft|int_a^bf(t)-f_n(t)dB(t)right|^2=int_a^bEleft|f(t)-f_n(t)right|^2dt$, so it will suffice to show that the right hand side of this equal sign converges to $0$ which i'm unsure how to do.
Second, I am try to show this directly using the definition of convergence in probability.
$Pleft(left|int_a^bf(t)-f_n(t)dB(t)right|>epsilonright)lefrac1epsilonEleft|int_a^bf(t)-f_n(t)dB(t)right|$, hence if I could show that $int_a^bf(t)dB(t) to int_a^bf_n(t)dB(t)$ in $L^1$ then I would be done.
Similarly,
$ Pleft(left|int_a^bf(t)-f_n(t)dB(t)right|>epsilonright)lefrac1epsilon^2Eleft|int_a^bf(t)-f_n(t)dB(t)right|^2= frac1epsilon^2int_a^bEleft|f(t)-f_n(t)right|^2dt$ so if we could show this last term converged to $0$ then we would be done.
probability-theory convergence stochastic-calculus
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Consider a Brownian Motion, $B(t)$, which are all $mathcal F_t$ measurable. Let $f,f_n$ be in $L_ad^2[a,b] times Omega$, which are the set of stochastic processes that are adapted to the filtration $mathcal F_t$ and satisfy $int_a^bEleft(f(t)^2right)dt < infty$. Suppose that $int_a^b|f(t)-f_n(t)|dtto0$ almost surely. Prove that $int_a^bf_n(t)dB(t) to int_a^bf_n(t)dB(t)$ in probability.
I am trying to show this two different ways. First by using $L^2$ convergence which will then imply convergence in probability. What I have for this way is the following:
Since $f$ and $f_n$ are in $L_ad^2$ then the ito integral $int_a^bf(t)-f_n(t)dB(t)$ exists and $Eleft|int_a^bf(t)-f_n(t)dB(t)right|^2=int_a^bEleft|f(t)-f_n(t)right|^2dt$, so it will suffice to show that the right hand side of this equal sign converges to $0$ which i'm unsure how to do.
Second, I am try to show this directly using the definition of convergence in probability.
$Pleft(left|int_a^bf(t)-f_n(t)dB(t)right|>epsilonright)lefrac1epsilonEleft|int_a^bf(t)-f_n(t)dB(t)right|$, hence if I could show that $int_a^bf(t)dB(t) to int_a^bf_n(t)dB(t)$ in $L^1$ then I would be done.
Similarly,
$ Pleft(left|int_a^bf(t)-f_n(t)dB(t)right|>epsilonright)lefrac1epsilon^2Eleft|int_a^bf(t)-f_n(t)dB(t)right|^2= frac1epsilon^2int_a^bEleft|f(t)-f_n(t)right|^2dt$ so if we could show this last term converged to $0$ then we would be done.
probability-theory convergence stochastic-calculus
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
For stochastic integrals $M_t := int_a^b f(s) , dB_s$ it holds that $mathbbE(M_t)=0$, note that this does not imply $mathbbE(|M_t|)=0$.
$endgroup$
– saz
Mar 19 at 10:41
$begingroup$
@saz I noticed that after I posted the question and will delete that from above, thank you though. Do you know how I should proceed with this problem?
$endgroup$
– alpastor
Mar 19 at 15:14
$begingroup$
As formulated, the statement is false. Maybe the assumption is that $int_a^b|f(t)-f_n(t)|^2dtto0$ a.s.?
$endgroup$
– zhoraster
Mar 19 at 16:49
$begingroup$
@zhoraster then could use the Generalized Lesbegue Dominated convergence and say $Eint_a^b|f(t)-f_n(t)|^2dtto0$ because $int_a^b|f(t)-f_n(t)|^2dt le 2int_a^b|f(t)|^2+|f_n(t)|^2dt$ and $2int_a^b|f(t)|^2+|f_n(t)|^2dt$ is in $L^1$ since $f,f_n in L_ad^2$ and if we assume $int_a^b|f(t)-f_n(t)|^2dtto0$ then $int_a^b|f_n(t)|^2dtto int_a^b|f(t)|^2dt$ which means $2int_a^b|f(t)|^2+|f_n(t)|^2dt to 4int_a^b|f(t)|^2dt$ which is also $L^1$.
$endgroup$
– alpastor
Mar 19 at 17:05
$begingroup$
I don't get your point. Currently the statement is false. You might need to edit the post.
$endgroup$
– zhoraster
Mar 20 at 4:30
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Consider a Brownian Motion, $B(t)$, which are all $mathcal F_t$ measurable. Let $f,f_n$ be in $L_ad^2[a,b] times Omega$, which are the set of stochastic processes that are adapted to the filtration $mathcal F_t$ and satisfy $int_a^bEleft(f(t)^2right)dt < infty$. Suppose that $int_a^b|f(t)-f_n(t)|dtto0$ almost surely. Prove that $int_a^bf_n(t)dB(t) to int_a^bf_n(t)dB(t)$ in probability.
I am trying to show this two different ways. First by using $L^2$ convergence which will then imply convergence in probability. What I have for this way is the following:
Since $f$ and $f_n$ are in $L_ad^2$ then the ito integral $int_a^bf(t)-f_n(t)dB(t)$ exists and $Eleft|int_a^bf(t)-f_n(t)dB(t)right|^2=int_a^bEleft|f(t)-f_n(t)right|^2dt$, so it will suffice to show that the right hand side of this equal sign converges to $0$ which i'm unsure how to do.
Second, I am try to show this directly using the definition of convergence in probability.
$Pleft(left|int_a^bf(t)-f_n(t)dB(t)right|>epsilonright)lefrac1epsilonEleft|int_a^bf(t)-f_n(t)dB(t)right|$, hence if I could show that $int_a^bf(t)dB(t) to int_a^bf_n(t)dB(t)$ in $L^1$ then I would be done.
Similarly,
$ Pleft(left|int_a^bf(t)-f_n(t)dB(t)right|>epsilonright)lefrac1epsilon^2Eleft|int_a^bf(t)-f_n(t)dB(t)right|^2= frac1epsilon^2int_a^bEleft|f(t)-f_n(t)right|^2dt$ so if we could show this last term converged to $0$ then we would be done.
probability-theory convergence stochastic-calculus
$endgroup$
Consider a Brownian Motion, $B(t)$, which are all $mathcal F_t$ measurable. Let $f,f_n$ be in $L_ad^2[a,b] times Omega$, which are the set of stochastic processes that are adapted to the filtration $mathcal F_t$ and satisfy $int_a^bEleft(f(t)^2right)dt < infty$. Suppose that $int_a^b|f(t)-f_n(t)|dtto0$ almost surely. Prove that $int_a^bf_n(t)dB(t) to int_a^bf_n(t)dB(t)$ in probability.
I am trying to show this two different ways. First by using $L^2$ convergence which will then imply convergence in probability. What I have for this way is the following:
Since $f$ and $f_n$ are in $L_ad^2$ then the ito integral $int_a^bf(t)-f_n(t)dB(t)$ exists and $Eleft|int_a^bf(t)-f_n(t)dB(t)right|^2=int_a^bEleft|f(t)-f_n(t)right|^2dt$, so it will suffice to show that the right hand side of this equal sign converges to $0$ which i'm unsure how to do.
Second, I am try to show this directly using the definition of convergence in probability.
$Pleft(left|int_a^bf(t)-f_n(t)dB(t)right|>epsilonright)lefrac1epsilonEleft|int_a^bf(t)-f_n(t)dB(t)right|$, hence if I could show that $int_a^bf(t)dB(t) to int_a^bf_n(t)dB(t)$ in $L^1$ then I would be done.
Similarly,
$ Pleft(left|int_a^bf(t)-f_n(t)dB(t)right|>epsilonright)lefrac1epsilon^2Eleft|int_a^bf(t)-f_n(t)dB(t)right|^2= frac1epsilon^2int_a^bEleft|f(t)-f_n(t)right|^2dt$ so if we could show this last term converged to $0$ then we would be done.
probability-theory convergence stochastic-calculus
probability-theory convergence stochastic-calculus
edited Mar 19 at 15:14
alpastor
asked Mar 18 at 20:13
alpastoralpastor
485314
485314
$begingroup$
For stochastic integrals $M_t := int_a^b f(s) , dB_s$ it holds that $mathbbE(M_t)=0$, note that this does not imply $mathbbE(|M_t|)=0$.
$endgroup$
– saz
Mar 19 at 10:41
$begingroup$
@saz I noticed that after I posted the question and will delete that from above, thank you though. Do you know how I should proceed with this problem?
$endgroup$
– alpastor
Mar 19 at 15:14
$begingroup$
As formulated, the statement is false. Maybe the assumption is that $int_a^b|f(t)-f_n(t)|^2dtto0$ a.s.?
$endgroup$
– zhoraster
Mar 19 at 16:49
$begingroup$
@zhoraster then could use the Generalized Lesbegue Dominated convergence and say $Eint_a^b|f(t)-f_n(t)|^2dtto0$ because $int_a^b|f(t)-f_n(t)|^2dt le 2int_a^b|f(t)|^2+|f_n(t)|^2dt$ and $2int_a^b|f(t)|^2+|f_n(t)|^2dt$ is in $L^1$ since $f,f_n in L_ad^2$ and if we assume $int_a^b|f(t)-f_n(t)|^2dtto0$ then $int_a^b|f_n(t)|^2dtto int_a^b|f(t)|^2dt$ which means $2int_a^b|f(t)|^2+|f_n(t)|^2dt to 4int_a^b|f(t)|^2dt$ which is also $L^1$.
$endgroup$
– alpastor
Mar 19 at 17:05
$begingroup$
I don't get your point. Currently the statement is false. You might need to edit the post.
$endgroup$
– zhoraster
Mar 20 at 4:30
add a comment |
$begingroup$
For stochastic integrals $M_t := int_a^b f(s) , dB_s$ it holds that $mathbbE(M_t)=0$, note that this does not imply $mathbbE(|M_t|)=0$.
$endgroup$
– saz
Mar 19 at 10:41
$begingroup$
@saz I noticed that after I posted the question and will delete that from above, thank you though. Do you know how I should proceed with this problem?
$endgroup$
– alpastor
Mar 19 at 15:14
$begingroup$
As formulated, the statement is false. Maybe the assumption is that $int_a^b|f(t)-f_n(t)|^2dtto0$ a.s.?
$endgroup$
– zhoraster
Mar 19 at 16:49
$begingroup$
@zhoraster then could use the Generalized Lesbegue Dominated convergence and say $Eint_a^b|f(t)-f_n(t)|^2dtto0$ because $int_a^b|f(t)-f_n(t)|^2dt le 2int_a^b|f(t)|^2+|f_n(t)|^2dt$ and $2int_a^b|f(t)|^2+|f_n(t)|^2dt$ is in $L^1$ since $f,f_n in L_ad^2$ and if we assume $int_a^b|f(t)-f_n(t)|^2dtto0$ then $int_a^b|f_n(t)|^2dtto int_a^b|f(t)|^2dt$ which means $2int_a^b|f(t)|^2+|f_n(t)|^2dt to 4int_a^b|f(t)|^2dt$ which is also $L^1$.
$endgroup$
– alpastor
Mar 19 at 17:05
$begingroup$
I don't get your point. Currently the statement is false. You might need to edit the post.
$endgroup$
– zhoraster
Mar 20 at 4:30
$begingroup$
For stochastic integrals $M_t := int_a^b f(s) , dB_s$ it holds that $mathbbE(M_t)=0$, note that this does not imply $mathbbE(|M_t|)=0$.
$endgroup$
– saz
Mar 19 at 10:41
$begingroup$
For stochastic integrals $M_t := int_a^b f(s) , dB_s$ it holds that $mathbbE(M_t)=0$, note that this does not imply $mathbbE(|M_t|)=0$.
$endgroup$
– saz
Mar 19 at 10:41
$begingroup$
@saz I noticed that after I posted the question and will delete that from above, thank you though. Do you know how I should proceed with this problem?
$endgroup$
– alpastor
Mar 19 at 15:14
$begingroup$
@saz I noticed that after I posted the question and will delete that from above, thank you though. Do you know how I should proceed with this problem?
$endgroup$
– alpastor
Mar 19 at 15:14
$begingroup$
As formulated, the statement is false. Maybe the assumption is that $int_a^b|f(t)-f_n(t)|^2dtto0$ a.s.?
$endgroup$
– zhoraster
Mar 19 at 16:49
$begingroup$
As formulated, the statement is false. Maybe the assumption is that $int_a^b|f(t)-f_n(t)|^2dtto0$ a.s.?
$endgroup$
– zhoraster
Mar 19 at 16:49
$begingroup$
@zhoraster then could use the Generalized Lesbegue Dominated convergence and say $Eint_a^b|f(t)-f_n(t)|^2dtto0$ because $int_a^b|f(t)-f_n(t)|^2dt le 2int_a^b|f(t)|^2+|f_n(t)|^2dt$ and $2int_a^b|f(t)|^2+|f_n(t)|^2dt$ is in $L^1$ since $f,f_n in L_ad^2$ and if we assume $int_a^b|f(t)-f_n(t)|^2dtto0$ then $int_a^b|f_n(t)|^2dtto int_a^b|f(t)|^2dt$ which means $2int_a^b|f(t)|^2+|f_n(t)|^2dt to 4int_a^b|f(t)|^2dt$ which is also $L^1$.
$endgroup$
– alpastor
Mar 19 at 17:05
$begingroup$
@zhoraster then could use the Generalized Lesbegue Dominated convergence and say $Eint_a^b|f(t)-f_n(t)|^2dtto0$ because $int_a^b|f(t)-f_n(t)|^2dt le 2int_a^b|f(t)|^2+|f_n(t)|^2dt$ and $2int_a^b|f(t)|^2+|f_n(t)|^2dt$ is in $L^1$ since $f,f_n in L_ad^2$ and if we assume $int_a^b|f(t)-f_n(t)|^2dtto0$ then $int_a^b|f_n(t)|^2dtto int_a^b|f(t)|^2dt$ which means $2int_a^b|f(t)|^2+|f_n(t)|^2dt to 4int_a^b|f(t)|^2dt$ which is also $L^1$.
$endgroup$
– alpastor
Mar 19 at 17:05
$begingroup$
I don't get your point. Currently the statement is false. You might need to edit the post.
$endgroup$
– zhoraster
Mar 20 at 4:30
$begingroup$
I don't get your point. Currently the statement is false. You might need to edit the post.
$endgroup$
– zhoraster
Mar 20 at 4:30
add a comment |
0
active
oldest
votes
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
);
);
, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);
else
createEditor();
);
function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);
);
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3153264%2fshowing-the-convergence-in-probabilty-of-two-ito-integrals%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
0
active
oldest
votes
0
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3153264%2fshowing-the-convergence-in-probabilty-of-two-ito-integrals%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
$begingroup$
For stochastic integrals $M_t := int_a^b f(s) , dB_s$ it holds that $mathbbE(M_t)=0$, note that this does not imply $mathbbE(|M_t|)=0$.
$endgroup$
– saz
Mar 19 at 10:41
$begingroup$
@saz I noticed that after I posted the question and will delete that from above, thank you though. Do you know how I should proceed with this problem?
$endgroup$
– alpastor
Mar 19 at 15:14
$begingroup$
As formulated, the statement is false. Maybe the assumption is that $int_a^b|f(t)-f_n(t)|^2dtto0$ a.s.?
$endgroup$
– zhoraster
Mar 19 at 16:49
$begingroup$
@zhoraster then could use the Generalized Lesbegue Dominated convergence and say $Eint_a^b|f(t)-f_n(t)|^2dtto0$ because $int_a^b|f(t)-f_n(t)|^2dt le 2int_a^b|f(t)|^2+|f_n(t)|^2dt$ and $2int_a^b|f(t)|^2+|f_n(t)|^2dt$ is in $L^1$ since $f,f_n in L_ad^2$ and if we assume $int_a^b|f(t)-f_n(t)|^2dtto0$ then $int_a^b|f_n(t)|^2dtto int_a^b|f(t)|^2dt$ which means $2int_a^b|f(t)|^2+|f_n(t)|^2dt to 4int_a^b|f(t)|^2dt$ which is also $L^1$.
$endgroup$
– alpastor
Mar 19 at 17:05
$begingroup$
I don't get your point. Currently the statement is false. You might need to edit the post.
$endgroup$
– zhoraster
Mar 20 at 4:30