Showing the convergence in probabilty of two Ito integrals The Next CEO of Stack OverflowConvergence in $L_1$ and Convergence of the IntegralsQuestions about expectation of stochastic integralsComputing an Ito Integral using the DefinitionFinding a probability measure such that the time-shifted Brownian motion is also a Brownian motionAre Ito Integrals adapted to the Brownian Motion FiltrationHelp with change of measure and martingalesAre there examples where these two stochastic integrals are not independent?Convergence of Stochastic IntegralIto isometry with two independent Brownian motionsAre Ito Integrals adapted to the Brownian Motion Filtration 2

Between two walls

What happens if you roll doubles 3 times then land on "Go to jail?"

Can we say or write : "No, it'sn't"?

Non-deterministic sum of floats

Make solar eclipses exceedingly rare, but still have new moons

How did the Bene Gesserit know how to make a Kwisatz Haderach?

How to invert MapIndexed on a ragged structure? How to construct a tree from rules?

Parametric curve length - calculus

RegionPlot of annulus gives a mesh

How fast would a person need to move to trick the eye?

How to Reset Passwords on Multiple Websites Easily?

Can I run my washing machine drain line into a condensate pump so it drains better?

I believe this to be a fraud - hired, then asked to cash check and send cash as Bitcoin

How to start emacs in "nothing" mode (`fundamental-mode`)

How to avoid supervisors with prejudiced views?

What benefits would be gained by using human laborers instead of drones in deep sea mining?

What exact does MIB represent in SNMP? How is it different from OID?

Would a galaxy be visible from outside, but nearby?

Interfacing a button to MCU (and PC) with 50m long cable

Unreliable Magic - Is it worth it?

Written every which way

Can you replace a racial trait cantrip when leveling up?

What is the result of assigning to std::vector<T>::begin()?

How do we know the LHC results are robust?



Showing the convergence in probabilty of two Ito integrals



The Next CEO of Stack OverflowConvergence in $L_1$ and Convergence of the IntegralsQuestions about expectation of stochastic integralsComputing an Ito Integral using the DefinitionFinding a probability measure such that the time-shifted Brownian motion is also a Brownian motionAre Ito Integrals adapted to the Brownian Motion FiltrationHelp with change of measure and martingalesAre there examples where these two stochastic integrals are not independent?Convergence of Stochastic IntegralIto isometry with two independent Brownian motionsAre Ito Integrals adapted to the Brownian Motion Filtration 2










0












$begingroup$



Consider a Brownian Motion, $B(t)$, which are all $mathcal F_t$ measurable. Let $f,f_n$ be in $L_ad^2[a,b] times Omega$, which are the set of stochastic processes that are adapted to the filtration $mathcal F_t$ and satisfy $int_a^bEleft(f(t)^2right)dt < infty$. Suppose that $int_a^b|f(t)-f_n(t)|dtto0$ almost surely. Prove that $int_a^bf_n(t)dB(t) to int_a^bf_n(t)dB(t)$ in probability.




I am trying to show this two different ways. First by using $L^2$ convergence which will then imply convergence in probability. What I have for this way is the following:



Since $f$ and $f_n$ are in $L_ad^2$ then the ito integral $int_a^bf(t)-f_n(t)dB(t)$ exists and $Eleft|int_a^bf(t)-f_n(t)dB(t)right|^2=int_a^bEleft|f(t)-f_n(t)right|^2dt$, so it will suffice to show that the right hand side of this equal sign converges to $0$ which i'm unsure how to do.



Second, I am try to show this directly using the definition of convergence in probability.



$Pleft(left|int_a^bf(t)-f_n(t)dB(t)right|>epsilonright)lefrac1epsilonEleft|int_a^bf(t)-f_n(t)dB(t)right|$, hence if I could show that $int_a^bf(t)dB(t) to int_a^bf_n(t)dB(t)$ in $L^1$ then I would be done.



Similarly,



$ Pleft(left|int_a^bf(t)-f_n(t)dB(t)right|>epsilonright)lefrac1epsilon^2Eleft|int_a^bf(t)-f_n(t)dB(t)right|^2= frac1epsilon^2int_a^bEleft|f(t)-f_n(t)right|^2dt$ so if we could show this last term converged to $0$ then we would be done.










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$











  • $begingroup$
    For stochastic integrals $M_t := int_a^b f(s) , dB_s$ it holds that $mathbbE(M_t)=0$, note that this does not imply $mathbbE(|M_t|)=0$.
    $endgroup$
    – saz
    Mar 19 at 10:41











  • $begingroup$
    @saz I noticed that after I posted the question and will delete that from above, thank you though. Do you know how I should proceed with this problem?
    $endgroup$
    – alpastor
    Mar 19 at 15:14










  • $begingroup$
    As formulated, the statement is false. Maybe the assumption is that $int_a^b|f(t)-f_n(t)|^2dtto0$ a.s.?
    $endgroup$
    – zhoraster
    Mar 19 at 16:49











  • $begingroup$
    @zhoraster then could use the Generalized Lesbegue Dominated convergence and say $Eint_a^b|f(t)-f_n(t)|^2dtto0$ because $int_a^b|f(t)-f_n(t)|^2dt le 2int_a^b|f(t)|^2+|f_n(t)|^2dt$ and $2int_a^b|f(t)|^2+|f_n(t)|^2dt$ is in $L^1$ since $f,f_n in L_ad^2$ and if we assume $int_a^b|f(t)-f_n(t)|^2dtto0$ then $int_a^b|f_n(t)|^2dtto int_a^b|f(t)|^2dt$ which means $2int_a^b|f(t)|^2+|f_n(t)|^2dt to 4int_a^b|f(t)|^2dt$ which is also $L^1$.
    $endgroup$
    – alpastor
    Mar 19 at 17:05










  • $begingroup$
    I don't get your point. Currently the statement is false. You might need to edit the post.
    $endgroup$
    – zhoraster
    Mar 20 at 4:30















0












$begingroup$



Consider a Brownian Motion, $B(t)$, which are all $mathcal F_t$ measurable. Let $f,f_n$ be in $L_ad^2[a,b] times Omega$, which are the set of stochastic processes that are adapted to the filtration $mathcal F_t$ and satisfy $int_a^bEleft(f(t)^2right)dt < infty$. Suppose that $int_a^b|f(t)-f_n(t)|dtto0$ almost surely. Prove that $int_a^bf_n(t)dB(t) to int_a^bf_n(t)dB(t)$ in probability.




I am trying to show this two different ways. First by using $L^2$ convergence which will then imply convergence in probability. What I have for this way is the following:



Since $f$ and $f_n$ are in $L_ad^2$ then the ito integral $int_a^bf(t)-f_n(t)dB(t)$ exists and $Eleft|int_a^bf(t)-f_n(t)dB(t)right|^2=int_a^bEleft|f(t)-f_n(t)right|^2dt$, so it will suffice to show that the right hand side of this equal sign converges to $0$ which i'm unsure how to do.



Second, I am try to show this directly using the definition of convergence in probability.



$Pleft(left|int_a^bf(t)-f_n(t)dB(t)right|>epsilonright)lefrac1epsilonEleft|int_a^bf(t)-f_n(t)dB(t)right|$, hence if I could show that $int_a^bf(t)dB(t) to int_a^bf_n(t)dB(t)$ in $L^1$ then I would be done.



Similarly,



$ Pleft(left|int_a^bf(t)-f_n(t)dB(t)right|>epsilonright)lefrac1epsilon^2Eleft|int_a^bf(t)-f_n(t)dB(t)right|^2= frac1epsilon^2int_a^bEleft|f(t)-f_n(t)right|^2dt$ so if we could show this last term converged to $0$ then we would be done.










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$











  • $begingroup$
    For stochastic integrals $M_t := int_a^b f(s) , dB_s$ it holds that $mathbbE(M_t)=0$, note that this does not imply $mathbbE(|M_t|)=0$.
    $endgroup$
    – saz
    Mar 19 at 10:41











  • $begingroup$
    @saz I noticed that after I posted the question and will delete that from above, thank you though. Do you know how I should proceed with this problem?
    $endgroup$
    – alpastor
    Mar 19 at 15:14










  • $begingroup$
    As formulated, the statement is false. Maybe the assumption is that $int_a^b|f(t)-f_n(t)|^2dtto0$ a.s.?
    $endgroup$
    – zhoraster
    Mar 19 at 16:49











  • $begingroup$
    @zhoraster then could use the Generalized Lesbegue Dominated convergence and say $Eint_a^b|f(t)-f_n(t)|^2dtto0$ because $int_a^b|f(t)-f_n(t)|^2dt le 2int_a^b|f(t)|^2+|f_n(t)|^2dt$ and $2int_a^b|f(t)|^2+|f_n(t)|^2dt$ is in $L^1$ since $f,f_n in L_ad^2$ and if we assume $int_a^b|f(t)-f_n(t)|^2dtto0$ then $int_a^b|f_n(t)|^2dtto int_a^b|f(t)|^2dt$ which means $2int_a^b|f(t)|^2+|f_n(t)|^2dt to 4int_a^b|f(t)|^2dt$ which is also $L^1$.
    $endgroup$
    – alpastor
    Mar 19 at 17:05










  • $begingroup$
    I don't get your point. Currently the statement is false. You might need to edit the post.
    $endgroup$
    – zhoraster
    Mar 20 at 4:30













0












0








0





$begingroup$



Consider a Brownian Motion, $B(t)$, which are all $mathcal F_t$ measurable. Let $f,f_n$ be in $L_ad^2[a,b] times Omega$, which are the set of stochastic processes that are adapted to the filtration $mathcal F_t$ and satisfy $int_a^bEleft(f(t)^2right)dt < infty$. Suppose that $int_a^b|f(t)-f_n(t)|dtto0$ almost surely. Prove that $int_a^bf_n(t)dB(t) to int_a^bf_n(t)dB(t)$ in probability.




I am trying to show this two different ways. First by using $L^2$ convergence which will then imply convergence in probability. What I have for this way is the following:



Since $f$ and $f_n$ are in $L_ad^2$ then the ito integral $int_a^bf(t)-f_n(t)dB(t)$ exists and $Eleft|int_a^bf(t)-f_n(t)dB(t)right|^2=int_a^bEleft|f(t)-f_n(t)right|^2dt$, so it will suffice to show that the right hand side of this equal sign converges to $0$ which i'm unsure how to do.



Second, I am try to show this directly using the definition of convergence in probability.



$Pleft(left|int_a^bf(t)-f_n(t)dB(t)right|>epsilonright)lefrac1epsilonEleft|int_a^bf(t)-f_n(t)dB(t)right|$, hence if I could show that $int_a^bf(t)dB(t) to int_a^bf_n(t)dB(t)$ in $L^1$ then I would be done.



Similarly,



$ Pleft(left|int_a^bf(t)-f_n(t)dB(t)right|>epsilonright)lefrac1epsilon^2Eleft|int_a^bf(t)-f_n(t)dB(t)right|^2= frac1epsilon^2int_a^bEleft|f(t)-f_n(t)right|^2dt$ so if we could show this last term converged to $0$ then we would be done.










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$





Consider a Brownian Motion, $B(t)$, which are all $mathcal F_t$ measurable. Let $f,f_n$ be in $L_ad^2[a,b] times Omega$, which are the set of stochastic processes that are adapted to the filtration $mathcal F_t$ and satisfy $int_a^bEleft(f(t)^2right)dt < infty$. Suppose that $int_a^b|f(t)-f_n(t)|dtto0$ almost surely. Prove that $int_a^bf_n(t)dB(t) to int_a^bf_n(t)dB(t)$ in probability.




I am trying to show this two different ways. First by using $L^2$ convergence which will then imply convergence in probability. What I have for this way is the following:



Since $f$ and $f_n$ are in $L_ad^2$ then the ito integral $int_a^bf(t)-f_n(t)dB(t)$ exists and $Eleft|int_a^bf(t)-f_n(t)dB(t)right|^2=int_a^bEleft|f(t)-f_n(t)right|^2dt$, so it will suffice to show that the right hand side of this equal sign converges to $0$ which i'm unsure how to do.



Second, I am try to show this directly using the definition of convergence in probability.



$Pleft(left|int_a^bf(t)-f_n(t)dB(t)right|>epsilonright)lefrac1epsilonEleft|int_a^bf(t)-f_n(t)dB(t)right|$, hence if I could show that $int_a^bf(t)dB(t) to int_a^bf_n(t)dB(t)$ in $L^1$ then I would be done.



Similarly,



$ Pleft(left|int_a^bf(t)-f_n(t)dB(t)right|>epsilonright)lefrac1epsilon^2Eleft|int_a^bf(t)-f_n(t)dB(t)right|^2= frac1epsilon^2int_a^bEleft|f(t)-f_n(t)right|^2dt$ so if we could show this last term converged to $0$ then we would be done.







probability-theory convergence stochastic-calculus






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited Mar 19 at 15:14







alpastor

















asked Mar 18 at 20:13









alpastoralpastor

485314




485314











  • $begingroup$
    For stochastic integrals $M_t := int_a^b f(s) , dB_s$ it holds that $mathbbE(M_t)=0$, note that this does not imply $mathbbE(|M_t|)=0$.
    $endgroup$
    – saz
    Mar 19 at 10:41











  • $begingroup$
    @saz I noticed that after I posted the question and will delete that from above, thank you though. Do you know how I should proceed with this problem?
    $endgroup$
    – alpastor
    Mar 19 at 15:14










  • $begingroup$
    As formulated, the statement is false. Maybe the assumption is that $int_a^b|f(t)-f_n(t)|^2dtto0$ a.s.?
    $endgroup$
    – zhoraster
    Mar 19 at 16:49











  • $begingroup$
    @zhoraster then could use the Generalized Lesbegue Dominated convergence and say $Eint_a^b|f(t)-f_n(t)|^2dtto0$ because $int_a^b|f(t)-f_n(t)|^2dt le 2int_a^b|f(t)|^2+|f_n(t)|^2dt$ and $2int_a^b|f(t)|^2+|f_n(t)|^2dt$ is in $L^1$ since $f,f_n in L_ad^2$ and if we assume $int_a^b|f(t)-f_n(t)|^2dtto0$ then $int_a^b|f_n(t)|^2dtto int_a^b|f(t)|^2dt$ which means $2int_a^b|f(t)|^2+|f_n(t)|^2dt to 4int_a^b|f(t)|^2dt$ which is also $L^1$.
    $endgroup$
    – alpastor
    Mar 19 at 17:05










  • $begingroup$
    I don't get your point. Currently the statement is false. You might need to edit the post.
    $endgroup$
    – zhoraster
    Mar 20 at 4:30
















  • $begingroup$
    For stochastic integrals $M_t := int_a^b f(s) , dB_s$ it holds that $mathbbE(M_t)=0$, note that this does not imply $mathbbE(|M_t|)=0$.
    $endgroup$
    – saz
    Mar 19 at 10:41











  • $begingroup$
    @saz I noticed that after I posted the question and will delete that from above, thank you though. Do you know how I should proceed with this problem?
    $endgroup$
    – alpastor
    Mar 19 at 15:14










  • $begingroup$
    As formulated, the statement is false. Maybe the assumption is that $int_a^b|f(t)-f_n(t)|^2dtto0$ a.s.?
    $endgroup$
    – zhoraster
    Mar 19 at 16:49











  • $begingroup$
    @zhoraster then could use the Generalized Lesbegue Dominated convergence and say $Eint_a^b|f(t)-f_n(t)|^2dtto0$ because $int_a^b|f(t)-f_n(t)|^2dt le 2int_a^b|f(t)|^2+|f_n(t)|^2dt$ and $2int_a^b|f(t)|^2+|f_n(t)|^2dt$ is in $L^1$ since $f,f_n in L_ad^2$ and if we assume $int_a^b|f(t)-f_n(t)|^2dtto0$ then $int_a^b|f_n(t)|^2dtto int_a^b|f(t)|^2dt$ which means $2int_a^b|f(t)|^2+|f_n(t)|^2dt to 4int_a^b|f(t)|^2dt$ which is also $L^1$.
    $endgroup$
    – alpastor
    Mar 19 at 17:05










  • $begingroup$
    I don't get your point. Currently the statement is false. You might need to edit the post.
    $endgroup$
    – zhoraster
    Mar 20 at 4:30















$begingroup$
For stochastic integrals $M_t := int_a^b f(s) , dB_s$ it holds that $mathbbE(M_t)=0$, note that this does not imply $mathbbE(|M_t|)=0$.
$endgroup$
– saz
Mar 19 at 10:41





$begingroup$
For stochastic integrals $M_t := int_a^b f(s) , dB_s$ it holds that $mathbbE(M_t)=0$, note that this does not imply $mathbbE(|M_t|)=0$.
$endgroup$
– saz
Mar 19 at 10:41













$begingroup$
@saz I noticed that after I posted the question and will delete that from above, thank you though. Do you know how I should proceed with this problem?
$endgroup$
– alpastor
Mar 19 at 15:14




$begingroup$
@saz I noticed that after I posted the question and will delete that from above, thank you though. Do you know how I should proceed with this problem?
$endgroup$
– alpastor
Mar 19 at 15:14












$begingroup$
As formulated, the statement is false. Maybe the assumption is that $int_a^b|f(t)-f_n(t)|^2dtto0$ a.s.?
$endgroup$
– zhoraster
Mar 19 at 16:49





$begingroup$
As formulated, the statement is false. Maybe the assumption is that $int_a^b|f(t)-f_n(t)|^2dtto0$ a.s.?
$endgroup$
– zhoraster
Mar 19 at 16:49













$begingroup$
@zhoraster then could use the Generalized Lesbegue Dominated convergence and say $Eint_a^b|f(t)-f_n(t)|^2dtto0$ because $int_a^b|f(t)-f_n(t)|^2dt le 2int_a^b|f(t)|^2+|f_n(t)|^2dt$ and $2int_a^b|f(t)|^2+|f_n(t)|^2dt$ is in $L^1$ since $f,f_n in L_ad^2$ and if we assume $int_a^b|f(t)-f_n(t)|^2dtto0$ then $int_a^b|f_n(t)|^2dtto int_a^b|f(t)|^2dt$ which means $2int_a^b|f(t)|^2+|f_n(t)|^2dt to 4int_a^b|f(t)|^2dt$ which is also $L^1$.
$endgroup$
– alpastor
Mar 19 at 17:05




$begingroup$
@zhoraster then could use the Generalized Lesbegue Dominated convergence and say $Eint_a^b|f(t)-f_n(t)|^2dtto0$ because $int_a^b|f(t)-f_n(t)|^2dt le 2int_a^b|f(t)|^2+|f_n(t)|^2dt$ and $2int_a^b|f(t)|^2+|f_n(t)|^2dt$ is in $L^1$ since $f,f_n in L_ad^2$ and if we assume $int_a^b|f(t)-f_n(t)|^2dtto0$ then $int_a^b|f_n(t)|^2dtto int_a^b|f(t)|^2dt$ which means $2int_a^b|f(t)|^2+|f_n(t)|^2dt to 4int_a^b|f(t)|^2dt$ which is also $L^1$.
$endgroup$
– alpastor
Mar 19 at 17:05












$begingroup$
I don't get your point. Currently the statement is false. You might need to edit the post.
$endgroup$
– zhoraster
Mar 20 at 4:30




$begingroup$
I don't get your point. Currently the statement is false. You might need to edit the post.
$endgroup$
– zhoraster
Mar 20 at 4:30










0






active

oldest

votes












Your Answer





StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
);
);
, "mathjax-editing");

StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);

else
createEditor();

);

function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);



);













draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3153264%2fshowing-the-convergence-in-probabilty-of-two-ito-integrals%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























0






active

oldest

votes








0






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes















draft saved

draft discarded
















































Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid


  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3153264%2fshowing-the-convergence-in-probabilty-of-two-ito-integrals%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

How should I support this large drywall patch? Planned maintenance scheduled April 23, 2019 at 00:00UTC (8:00pm US/Eastern) Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara Unicorn Meta Zoo #1: Why another podcast?How do I cover large gaps in drywall?How do I keep drywall around a patch from crumbling?Can I glue a second layer of drywall?How to patch long strip on drywall?Large drywall patch: how to avoid bulging seams?Drywall Mesh Patch vs. Bulge? To remove or not to remove?How to fix this drywall job?Prep drywall before backsplashWhat's the best way to fix this horrible drywall patch job?Drywall patching using 3M Patch Plus Primer

random experiment with two different functions on unit interval Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara Planned maintenance scheduled April 23, 2019 at 00:00UTC (8:00pm US/Eastern)Random variable and probability space notionsRandom Walk with EdgesFinding functions where the increase over a random interval is Poisson distributedNumber of days until dayCan an observed event in fact be of zero probability?Unit random processmodels of coins and uniform distributionHow to get the number of successes given $n$ trials , probability $P$ and a random variable $X$Absorbing Markov chain in a computer. Is “almost every” turned into always convergence in computer executions?Stopped random walk is not uniformly integrable

Lowndes Grove History Architecture References Navigation menu32°48′6″N 79°57′58″W / 32.80167°N 79.96611°W / 32.80167; -79.9661132°48′6″N 79°57′58″W / 32.80167°N 79.96611°W / 32.80167; -79.9661178002500"National Register Information System"Historic houses of South Carolina"Lowndes Grove""+32° 48' 6.00", −79° 57' 58.00""Lowndes Grove, Charleston County (260 St. Margaret St., Charleston)""Lowndes Grove"The Charleston ExpositionIt Happened in South Carolina"Lowndes Grove (House), Saint Margaret Street & Sixth Avenue, Charleston, Charleston County, SC(Photographs)"Plantations of the Carolina Low Countrye