Proving continuity and boundedness of the Fourier Transform The Next CEO of Stack OverflowFourier transform (properties)Define The Improper Integral in Fourier TransformFinding Fourier Transform with Special PropertiesIntegrable Fourier transform implies continuityBoundedness of Fourier transformFourier transform of $frac1sqrt1 + x^2$Continuity of fourier transform with complex argumentProving Uniform Continuity of Fourier transform (Related to measure theory)Fourier transform and lebesgue integralNon trivial condition for continuity of multivariable Fourier transform

Why do we use the plural of movies in this phrase "We went to the movies last night."?

Example of a Mathematician/Physicist whose Other Publications during their PhD eclipsed their PhD Thesis

What flight has the highest ratio of time difference to flight time?

Are there any limitations on attacking while grappling?

What does convergence in distribution "in the Gromov–Hausdorff" sense mean?

Do I need to enable Dev Hub in my PROD Org?

Is it possible to search for a directory/file combination?

Why didn't Khan get resurrected in the Genesis Explosion?

What happens if you roll doubles 3 times then land on "Go to jail?"

Help understanding this unsettling image of Titan, Epimetheus, and Saturn's rings?

Real integral using residue theorem - why doesn't this work?

Bold, vivid family

Is there an analogue of projective spaces for proper schemes?

How do I go from 300 unfinished/half written blog posts, to published posts?

What happened in Rome, when the western empire "fell"?

How do scammers retract money, while you can’t?

Is there a way to save my career from absolute disaster?

I believe this to be a fraud - hired, then asked to cash check and send cash as Bitcoin

What can we do to stop prior company from asking us questions?

Received an invoice from my ex-employer billing me for training; how to handle?

sp_blitzCache results Memory grants

In excess I'm lethal

What is the result of assigning to std::vector<T>::begin()?

Can you replace a racial trait cantrip when leveling up?



Proving continuity and boundedness of the Fourier Transform



The Next CEO of Stack OverflowFourier transform (properties)Define The Improper Integral in Fourier TransformFinding Fourier Transform with Special PropertiesIntegrable Fourier transform implies continuityBoundedness of Fourier transformFourier transform of $frac1sqrt1 + x^2$Continuity of fourier transform with complex argumentProving Uniform Continuity of Fourier transform (Related to measure theory)Fourier transform and lebesgue integralNon trivial condition for continuity of multivariable Fourier transform










2












$begingroup$



Let $fin L^1(mathbb R^d)$. Define the Fourier transform of $f$ by $$hatf(y)=int_mathbb R^df(x)e^-2pi ixcdot y,dx,,,,(yinmathbb R^d).$$
Show that $hatf:mathbb R^dtomathbbC$ is a continuous function and $|hatf|_inftyleq|f|_1.$




$textbfMy Attempt:$ First we prove continuity. Let $yinmathbb R^d$ be arbitrary but fixed, and let $(y_n)_nsubsetmathbb R^d$ such that $y_nto y$ as $ntoinfty$. Then for every $xinmathbb R^d$ we have that $f(x)e^-2pi ixcdot y_nto f(x)e^-2pi ixcdot y$ as $ntoinfty$, since the function $ymapsto e^-2pi ixcdot y$ is continuous. Now observe that $vert f(x)e^-2pi ixcdot y_nvertleqvert f(x)vert$ for all $xinmathbb R^d.$ Therefore by the Dominated convergence theorem, it follows that $$limlimits_ntoinftyhatf(y_n)=int_mathbb R^df(x)e^-2pi ixcdot y,dx=hatf(y).$$ Since $yinmathbb R^d$ was arbitrary, the function $hatf:mathbb R^dtomathbbC$ is continuous.



Now we prove that $|hatf|_inftyleq|f|_1.$ Note that for all $yinmathbb R^d$ we have $$vert hatf(y)vertleqint_mathbb R^dvert f(x)vertvert e^-2pi ixcdot yvert,dx=|f|_1.$$ Since the above holds for all $yinmathbb R^d$, it follows that $|hat f(y)|_inftyleq|f|_1.$




Do you agree with the my proof?



Any feedback is much welcomed. Thank your for your time.










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$











  • $begingroup$
    Sounds right to me...
    $endgroup$
    – Mostafa Ayaz
    Mar 20 at 0:13















2












$begingroup$



Let $fin L^1(mathbb R^d)$. Define the Fourier transform of $f$ by $$hatf(y)=int_mathbb R^df(x)e^-2pi ixcdot y,dx,,,,(yinmathbb R^d).$$
Show that $hatf:mathbb R^dtomathbbC$ is a continuous function and $|hatf|_inftyleq|f|_1.$




$textbfMy Attempt:$ First we prove continuity. Let $yinmathbb R^d$ be arbitrary but fixed, and let $(y_n)_nsubsetmathbb R^d$ such that $y_nto y$ as $ntoinfty$. Then for every $xinmathbb R^d$ we have that $f(x)e^-2pi ixcdot y_nto f(x)e^-2pi ixcdot y$ as $ntoinfty$, since the function $ymapsto e^-2pi ixcdot y$ is continuous. Now observe that $vert f(x)e^-2pi ixcdot y_nvertleqvert f(x)vert$ for all $xinmathbb R^d.$ Therefore by the Dominated convergence theorem, it follows that $$limlimits_ntoinftyhatf(y_n)=int_mathbb R^df(x)e^-2pi ixcdot y,dx=hatf(y).$$ Since $yinmathbb R^d$ was arbitrary, the function $hatf:mathbb R^dtomathbbC$ is continuous.



Now we prove that $|hatf|_inftyleq|f|_1.$ Note that for all $yinmathbb R^d$ we have $$vert hatf(y)vertleqint_mathbb R^dvert f(x)vertvert e^-2pi ixcdot yvert,dx=|f|_1.$$ Since the above holds for all $yinmathbb R^d$, it follows that $|hat f(y)|_inftyleq|f|_1.$




Do you agree with the my proof?



Any feedback is much welcomed. Thank your for your time.










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$











  • $begingroup$
    Sounds right to me...
    $endgroup$
    – Mostafa Ayaz
    Mar 20 at 0:13













2












2








2





$begingroup$



Let $fin L^1(mathbb R^d)$. Define the Fourier transform of $f$ by $$hatf(y)=int_mathbb R^df(x)e^-2pi ixcdot y,dx,,,,(yinmathbb R^d).$$
Show that $hatf:mathbb R^dtomathbbC$ is a continuous function and $|hatf|_inftyleq|f|_1.$




$textbfMy Attempt:$ First we prove continuity. Let $yinmathbb R^d$ be arbitrary but fixed, and let $(y_n)_nsubsetmathbb R^d$ such that $y_nto y$ as $ntoinfty$. Then for every $xinmathbb R^d$ we have that $f(x)e^-2pi ixcdot y_nto f(x)e^-2pi ixcdot y$ as $ntoinfty$, since the function $ymapsto e^-2pi ixcdot y$ is continuous. Now observe that $vert f(x)e^-2pi ixcdot y_nvertleqvert f(x)vert$ for all $xinmathbb R^d.$ Therefore by the Dominated convergence theorem, it follows that $$limlimits_ntoinftyhatf(y_n)=int_mathbb R^df(x)e^-2pi ixcdot y,dx=hatf(y).$$ Since $yinmathbb R^d$ was arbitrary, the function $hatf:mathbb R^dtomathbbC$ is continuous.



Now we prove that $|hatf|_inftyleq|f|_1.$ Note that for all $yinmathbb R^d$ we have $$vert hatf(y)vertleqint_mathbb R^dvert f(x)vertvert e^-2pi ixcdot yvert,dx=|f|_1.$$ Since the above holds for all $yinmathbb R^d$, it follows that $|hat f(y)|_inftyleq|f|_1.$




Do you agree with the my proof?



Any feedback is much welcomed. Thank your for your time.










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$





Let $fin L^1(mathbb R^d)$. Define the Fourier transform of $f$ by $$hatf(y)=int_mathbb R^df(x)e^-2pi ixcdot y,dx,,,,(yinmathbb R^d).$$
Show that $hatf:mathbb R^dtomathbbC$ is a continuous function and $|hatf|_inftyleq|f|_1.$




$textbfMy Attempt:$ First we prove continuity. Let $yinmathbb R^d$ be arbitrary but fixed, and let $(y_n)_nsubsetmathbb R^d$ such that $y_nto y$ as $ntoinfty$. Then for every $xinmathbb R^d$ we have that $f(x)e^-2pi ixcdot y_nto f(x)e^-2pi ixcdot y$ as $ntoinfty$, since the function $ymapsto e^-2pi ixcdot y$ is continuous. Now observe that $vert f(x)e^-2pi ixcdot y_nvertleqvert f(x)vert$ for all $xinmathbb R^d.$ Therefore by the Dominated convergence theorem, it follows that $$limlimits_ntoinftyhatf(y_n)=int_mathbb R^df(x)e^-2pi ixcdot y,dx=hatf(y).$$ Since $yinmathbb R^d$ was arbitrary, the function $hatf:mathbb R^dtomathbbC$ is continuous.



Now we prove that $|hatf|_inftyleq|f|_1.$ Note that for all $yinmathbb R^d$ we have $$vert hatf(y)vertleqint_mathbb R^dvert f(x)vertvert e^-2pi ixcdot yvert,dx=|f|_1.$$ Since the above holds for all $yinmathbb R^d$, it follows that $|hat f(y)|_inftyleq|f|_1.$




Do you agree with the my proof?



Any feedback is much welcomed. Thank your for your time.







real-analysis proof-verification fourier-analysis lebesgue-integral fourier-transform






share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question











share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question










asked Mar 18 at 21:32









Gaby AlfonsoGaby Alfonso

1,1881318




1,1881318











  • $begingroup$
    Sounds right to me...
    $endgroup$
    – Mostafa Ayaz
    Mar 20 at 0:13
















  • $begingroup$
    Sounds right to me...
    $endgroup$
    – Mostafa Ayaz
    Mar 20 at 0:13















$begingroup$
Sounds right to me...
$endgroup$
– Mostafa Ayaz
Mar 20 at 0:13




$begingroup$
Sounds right to me...
$endgroup$
– Mostafa Ayaz
Mar 20 at 0:13










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















1












$begingroup$

Your proof is correct, but I think it is not the best possible: you use the Dominated convergence theorem, which is quite a strong result, only to prove continuity of the Fourier transform.



Another proof could be based on



$|hatf(y+h)-hatf(y)|=|int_mathbbR^df(x)e^-2pi i xcdot y(e^-2pi ixcdot h-1)|
leqint_mathbbR^d|f(x)||e^-2pi i xcdot h-1|$



This equation one has the advantage not do depend on $y$, and from this we deduce that the continuity is uniform (some work is required to show it thought, since $|e^-2pi i xcdot h-1|$ doesn't go to $0$ uniformly), and we did this without appelling to $hatf$ the Dominated convergence theorem.



For what concerns the boundedness of $hatf$, your proof is perfectly fine.






share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    In my opinion anyone studying Fourier transforms of $L^1$ function should have no hesitation to use DCT, MCT etc. However if we are specifically asked to prove uniform continuity, then your comment on OP's proof is very reasonable.
    $endgroup$
    – Kavi Rama Murthy
    Mar 18 at 23:47










  • $begingroup$
    @KaviRamaMurthy yes, you are right
    $endgroup$
    – Gabriele Cassese
    Mar 19 at 6:08










  • $begingroup$
    Why do you think you've shown the continuity is uniform? $ |e^-2pi i xcdot h-1|$ is not uniformly small.
    $endgroup$
    – zhw.
    Mar 19 at 18:04











  • $begingroup$
    @zhw. Because the bound on the distance does not depend on $y$ but only on $h$. Thus, for $epsilon>0$ small enough, we can obtain a relation such that $|x-x_0|<h rightarrow |hatf(x)-hatf(x_0)|<epsilon$
    $endgroup$
    – Gabriele Cassese
    Mar 19 at 18:16











  • $begingroup$
    @zhw. The integral will have to be divided in pieces to avoid too much oscillations caused by the dipendence on $x$ ( or maybe using an approximation of $f$ with compact-supported functions), but doing this will result in proving the uniform continuity
    $endgroup$
    – Gabriele Cassese
    Mar 19 at 18:22












Your Answer





StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
);
);
, "mathjax-editing");

StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);

else
createEditor();

);

function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);



);













draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3153340%2fproving-continuity-and-boundedness-of-the-fourier-transform%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes








1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes









1












$begingroup$

Your proof is correct, but I think it is not the best possible: you use the Dominated convergence theorem, which is quite a strong result, only to prove continuity of the Fourier transform.



Another proof could be based on



$|hatf(y+h)-hatf(y)|=|int_mathbbR^df(x)e^-2pi i xcdot y(e^-2pi ixcdot h-1)|
leqint_mathbbR^d|f(x)||e^-2pi i xcdot h-1|$



This equation one has the advantage not do depend on $y$, and from this we deduce that the continuity is uniform (some work is required to show it thought, since $|e^-2pi i xcdot h-1|$ doesn't go to $0$ uniformly), and we did this without appelling to $hatf$ the Dominated convergence theorem.



For what concerns the boundedness of $hatf$, your proof is perfectly fine.






share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    In my opinion anyone studying Fourier transforms of $L^1$ function should have no hesitation to use DCT, MCT etc. However if we are specifically asked to prove uniform continuity, then your comment on OP's proof is very reasonable.
    $endgroup$
    – Kavi Rama Murthy
    Mar 18 at 23:47










  • $begingroup$
    @KaviRamaMurthy yes, you are right
    $endgroup$
    – Gabriele Cassese
    Mar 19 at 6:08










  • $begingroup$
    Why do you think you've shown the continuity is uniform? $ |e^-2pi i xcdot h-1|$ is not uniformly small.
    $endgroup$
    – zhw.
    Mar 19 at 18:04











  • $begingroup$
    @zhw. Because the bound on the distance does not depend on $y$ but only on $h$. Thus, for $epsilon>0$ small enough, we can obtain a relation such that $|x-x_0|<h rightarrow |hatf(x)-hatf(x_0)|<epsilon$
    $endgroup$
    – Gabriele Cassese
    Mar 19 at 18:16











  • $begingroup$
    @zhw. The integral will have to be divided in pieces to avoid too much oscillations caused by the dipendence on $x$ ( or maybe using an approximation of $f$ with compact-supported functions), but doing this will result in proving the uniform continuity
    $endgroup$
    – Gabriele Cassese
    Mar 19 at 18:22
















1












$begingroup$

Your proof is correct, but I think it is not the best possible: you use the Dominated convergence theorem, which is quite a strong result, only to prove continuity of the Fourier transform.



Another proof could be based on



$|hatf(y+h)-hatf(y)|=|int_mathbbR^df(x)e^-2pi i xcdot y(e^-2pi ixcdot h-1)|
leqint_mathbbR^d|f(x)||e^-2pi i xcdot h-1|$



This equation one has the advantage not do depend on $y$, and from this we deduce that the continuity is uniform (some work is required to show it thought, since $|e^-2pi i xcdot h-1|$ doesn't go to $0$ uniformly), and we did this without appelling to $hatf$ the Dominated convergence theorem.



For what concerns the boundedness of $hatf$, your proof is perfectly fine.






share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    In my opinion anyone studying Fourier transforms of $L^1$ function should have no hesitation to use DCT, MCT etc. However if we are specifically asked to prove uniform continuity, then your comment on OP's proof is very reasonable.
    $endgroup$
    – Kavi Rama Murthy
    Mar 18 at 23:47










  • $begingroup$
    @KaviRamaMurthy yes, you are right
    $endgroup$
    – Gabriele Cassese
    Mar 19 at 6:08










  • $begingroup$
    Why do you think you've shown the continuity is uniform? $ |e^-2pi i xcdot h-1|$ is not uniformly small.
    $endgroup$
    – zhw.
    Mar 19 at 18:04











  • $begingroup$
    @zhw. Because the bound on the distance does not depend on $y$ but only on $h$. Thus, for $epsilon>0$ small enough, we can obtain a relation such that $|x-x_0|<h rightarrow |hatf(x)-hatf(x_0)|<epsilon$
    $endgroup$
    – Gabriele Cassese
    Mar 19 at 18:16











  • $begingroup$
    @zhw. The integral will have to be divided in pieces to avoid too much oscillations caused by the dipendence on $x$ ( or maybe using an approximation of $f$ with compact-supported functions), but doing this will result in proving the uniform continuity
    $endgroup$
    – Gabriele Cassese
    Mar 19 at 18:22














1












1








1





$begingroup$

Your proof is correct, but I think it is not the best possible: you use the Dominated convergence theorem, which is quite a strong result, only to prove continuity of the Fourier transform.



Another proof could be based on



$|hatf(y+h)-hatf(y)|=|int_mathbbR^df(x)e^-2pi i xcdot y(e^-2pi ixcdot h-1)|
leqint_mathbbR^d|f(x)||e^-2pi i xcdot h-1|$



This equation one has the advantage not do depend on $y$, and from this we deduce that the continuity is uniform (some work is required to show it thought, since $|e^-2pi i xcdot h-1|$ doesn't go to $0$ uniformly), and we did this without appelling to $hatf$ the Dominated convergence theorem.



For what concerns the boundedness of $hatf$, your proof is perfectly fine.






share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$



Your proof is correct, but I think it is not the best possible: you use the Dominated convergence theorem, which is quite a strong result, only to prove continuity of the Fourier transform.



Another proof could be based on



$|hatf(y+h)-hatf(y)|=|int_mathbbR^df(x)e^-2pi i xcdot y(e^-2pi ixcdot h-1)|
leqint_mathbbR^d|f(x)||e^-2pi i xcdot h-1|$



This equation one has the advantage not do depend on $y$, and from this we deduce that the continuity is uniform (some work is required to show it thought, since $|e^-2pi i xcdot h-1|$ doesn't go to $0$ uniformly), and we did this without appelling to $hatf$ the Dominated convergence theorem.



For what concerns the boundedness of $hatf$, your proof is perfectly fine.







share|cite|improve this answer














share|cite|improve this answer



share|cite|improve this answer








edited Mar 19 at 19:05

























answered Mar 18 at 21:57









Gabriele CasseseGabriele Cassese

1,181316




1,181316











  • $begingroup$
    In my opinion anyone studying Fourier transforms of $L^1$ function should have no hesitation to use DCT, MCT etc. However if we are specifically asked to prove uniform continuity, then your comment on OP's proof is very reasonable.
    $endgroup$
    – Kavi Rama Murthy
    Mar 18 at 23:47










  • $begingroup$
    @KaviRamaMurthy yes, you are right
    $endgroup$
    – Gabriele Cassese
    Mar 19 at 6:08










  • $begingroup$
    Why do you think you've shown the continuity is uniform? $ |e^-2pi i xcdot h-1|$ is not uniformly small.
    $endgroup$
    – zhw.
    Mar 19 at 18:04











  • $begingroup$
    @zhw. Because the bound on the distance does not depend on $y$ but only on $h$. Thus, for $epsilon>0$ small enough, we can obtain a relation such that $|x-x_0|<h rightarrow |hatf(x)-hatf(x_0)|<epsilon$
    $endgroup$
    – Gabriele Cassese
    Mar 19 at 18:16











  • $begingroup$
    @zhw. The integral will have to be divided in pieces to avoid too much oscillations caused by the dipendence on $x$ ( or maybe using an approximation of $f$ with compact-supported functions), but doing this will result in proving the uniform continuity
    $endgroup$
    – Gabriele Cassese
    Mar 19 at 18:22

















  • $begingroup$
    In my opinion anyone studying Fourier transforms of $L^1$ function should have no hesitation to use DCT, MCT etc. However if we are specifically asked to prove uniform continuity, then your comment on OP's proof is very reasonable.
    $endgroup$
    – Kavi Rama Murthy
    Mar 18 at 23:47










  • $begingroup$
    @KaviRamaMurthy yes, you are right
    $endgroup$
    – Gabriele Cassese
    Mar 19 at 6:08










  • $begingroup$
    Why do you think you've shown the continuity is uniform? $ |e^-2pi i xcdot h-1|$ is not uniformly small.
    $endgroup$
    – zhw.
    Mar 19 at 18:04











  • $begingroup$
    @zhw. Because the bound on the distance does not depend on $y$ but only on $h$. Thus, for $epsilon>0$ small enough, we can obtain a relation such that $|x-x_0|<h rightarrow |hatf(x)-hatf(x_0)|<epsilon$
    $endgroup$
    – Gabriele Cassese
    Mar 19 at 18:16











  • $begingroup$
    @zhw. The integral will have to be divided in pieces to avoid too much oscillations caused by the dipendence on $x$ ( or maybe using an approximation of $f$ with compact-supported functions), but doing this will result in proving the uniform continuity
    $endgroup$
    – Gabriele Cassese
    Mar 19 at 18:22
















$begingroup$
In my opinion anyone studying Fourier transforms of $L^1$ function should have no hesitation to use DCT, MCT etc. However if we are specifically asked to prove uniform continuity, then your comment on OP's proof is very reasonable.
$endgroup$
– Kavi Rama Murthy
Mar 18 at 23:47




$begingroup$
In my opinion anyone studying Fourier transforms of $L^1$ function should have no hesitation to use DCT, MCT etc. However if we are specifically asked to prove uniform continuity, then your comment on OP's proof is very reasonable.
$endgroup$
– Kavi Rama Murthy
Mar 18 at 23:47












$begingroup$
@KaviRamaMurthy yes, you are right
$endgroup$
– Gabriele Cassese
Mar 19 at 6:08




$begingroup$
@KaviRamaMurthy yes, you are right
$endgroup$
– Gabriele Cassese
Mar 19 at 6:08












$begingroup$
Why do you think you've shown the continuity is uniform? $ |e^-2pi i xcdot h-1|$ is not uniformly small.
$endgroup$
– zhw.
Mar 19 at 18:04





$begingroup$
Why do you think you've shown the continuity is uniform? $ |e^-2pi i xcdot h-1|$ is not uniformly small.
$endgroup$
– zhw.
Mar 19 at 18:04













$begingroup$
@zhw. Because the bound on the distance does not depend on $y$ but only on $h$. Thus, for $epsilon>0$ small enough, we can obtain a relation such that $|x-x_0|<h rightarrow |hatf(x)-hatf(x_0)|<epsilon$
$endgroup$
– Gabriele Cassese
Mar 19 at 18:16





$begingroup$
@zhw. Because the bound on the distance does not depend on $y$ but only on $h$. Thus, for $epsilon>0$ small enough, we can obtain a relation such that $|x-x_0|<h rightarrow |hatf(x)-hatf(x_0)|<epsilon$
$endgroup$
– Gabriele Cassese
Mar 19 at 18:16













$begingroup$
@zhw. The integral will have to be divided in pieces to avoid too much oscillations caused by the dipendence on $x$ ( or maybe using an approximation of $f$ with compact-supported functions), but doing this will result in proving the uniform continuity
$endgroup$
– Gabriele Cassese
Mar 19 at 18:22





$begingroup$
@zhw. The integral will have to be divided in pieces to avoid too much oscillations caused by the dipendence on $x$ ( or maybe using an approximation of $f$ with compact-supported functions), but doing this will result in proving the uniform continuity
$endgroup$
– Gabriele Cassese
Mar 19 at 18:22


















draft saved

draft discarded
















































Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid


  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3153340%2fproving-continuity-and-boundedness-of-the-fourier-transform%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

Solar Wings Breeze Design and development Specifications (Breeze) References Navigation menu1368-485X"Hang glider: Breeze (Solar Wings)"e

Kathakali Contents Etymology and nomenclature History Repertoire Songs and musical instruments Traditional plays Styles: Sampradayam Training centers and awards Relationship to other dance forms See also Notes References External links Navigation menueThe Illustrated Encyclopedia of Hinduism: A-MSouth Asian Folklore: An EncyclopediaRoutledge International Encyclopedia of Women: Global Women's Issues and KnowledgeKathakali Dance-drama: Where Gods and Demons Come to PlayKathakali Dance-drama: Where Gods and Demons Come to PlayKathakali Dance-drama: Where Gods and Demons Come to Play10.1353/atj.2005.0004The Illustrated Encyclopedia of Hinduism: A-MEncyclopedia of HinduismKathakali Dance-drama: Where Gods and Demons Come to PlaySonic Liturgy: Ritual and Music in Hindu Tradition"The Mirror of Gesture"Kathakali Dance-drama: Where Gods and Demons Come to Play"Kathakali"Indian Theatre: Traditions of PerformanceIndian Theatre: Traditions of PerformanceIndian Theatre: Traditions of PerformanceIndian Theatre: Traditions of PerformanceMedieval Indian Literature: An AnthologyThe Oxford Companion to Indian TheatreSouth Asian Folklore: An Encyclopedia : Afghanistan, Bangladesh, India, Nepal, Pakistan, Sri LankaThe Rise of Performance Studies: Rethinking Richard Schechner's Broad SpectrumIndian Theatre: Traditions of PerformanceModern Asian Theatre and Performance 1900-2000Critical Theory and PerformanceBetween Theater and AnthropologyKathakali603847011Indian Theatre: Traditions of PerformanceIndian Theatre: Traditions of PerformanceIndian Theatre: Traditions of PerformanceBetween Theater and AnthropologyBetween Theater and AnthropologyNambeesan Smaraka AwardsArchivedThe Cambridge Guide to TheatreRoutledge International Encyclopedia of Women: Global Women's Issues and KnowledgeThe Garland Encyclopedia of World Music: South Asia : the Indian subcontinentThe Ethos of Noh: Actors and Their Art10.2307/1145740By Means of Performance: Intercultural Studies of Theatre and Ritual10.1017/s204912550000100xReconceiving the Renaissance: A Critical ReaderPerformance TheoryListening to Theatre: The Aural Dimension of Beijing Opera10.2307/1146013Kathakali: The Art of the Non-WorldlyOn KathakaliKathakali, the dance theatreThe Kathakali Complex: Performance & StructureKathakali Dance-Drama: Where Gods and Demons Come to Play10.1093/obo/9780195399318-0071Drama and Ritual of Early Hinduism"In the Shadow of Hollywood Orientalism: Authentic East Indian Dancing"10.1080/08949460490274013Sanskrit Play Production in Ancient IndiaIndian Music: History and StructureBharata, the Nāṭyaśāstra233639306Table of Contents2238067286469807Dance In Indian Painting10.2307/32047833204783Kathakali Dance-Theatre: A Visual Narrative of Sacred Indian MimeIndian Classical Dance: The Renaissance and BeyondKathakali: an indigenous art-form of Keralaeee

Method to test if a number is a perfect power? Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara Planned maintenance scheduled April 23, 2019 at 00:00UTC (8:00pm US/Eastern)Detecting perfect squares faster than by extracting square rooteffective way to get the integer sequence A181392 from oeisA rarely mentioned fact about perfect powersHow many numbers such $n$ are there that $n<100,lfloorsqrtn rfloor mid n$Check perfect squareness by modulo division against multiple basesFor what pair of integers $(a,b)$ is $3^a + 7^b$ a perfect square.Do there exist any positive integers $n$ such that $lfloore^nrfloor$ is a perfect power? What is the probability that one exists?finding perfect power factors of an integerProve that the sequence contains a perfect square for any natural number $m $ in the domain of $f$ .Counting Perfect Powers