canonical bundle of Veronese embedding The Next CEO of Stack OverflowCanonical Vector Bundle associated to a complete intersectionHartshorne proof of adjunction formula proposition II.8.20Normal bundle to complete intersection in $mathbbP^n$Complete Intersection does not lie in a hyperplane?Canonical bundle of the Lagrangian GrassmannianCanonical divisor of smooth complete intersection curve is very ample for genus $g geq 2$.When is the canonical sheaf of a curve very ample?Pullback of line bundle of negative degree has no global sections.Proof of Generalized Bézout theorem using Veronese Embedding mapCanonical bundle of blow up at singular point

If/When UK leaves the EU, can a future goverment conduct a referendum to join the EU?

How do I reset passwords on multiple websites easily?

Is it possible to search for a directory/file combination?

How do we know the LHC results are robust?

Anatomically Correct Strange Women In Ponds Distributing Swords

If the heap is initialized for security, then why is the stack uninitialized?

Is there a way to save my career from absolute disaster?

Does it take more energy to get to Venus or to Mars?

What is "(CFMCC)" on an ILS approach chart?

Preparing Indesign booklet with .psd graphics for print

To not tell, not take, and not want

Which tube will fit a -(700 x 25c) wheel?

Why do we use the plural of movies in this phrase "We went to the movies last night."?

Can I run my washing machine drain line into a condensate pump so it drains better?

How to count occurrences of text in a file?

Indicator light circuit

Inappropriate reference requests from Journal reviewers

What flight has the highest ratio of time difference to flight time?

Multiple labels for a single equation

Why didn't Khan get resurrected in the Genesis Explosion?

What can we do to stop prior company from asking us questions?

In excess I'm lethal

Received an invoice from my ex-employer billing me for training; how to handle?

How does the Z80 determine which peripheral sent an interrupt?



canonical bundle of Veronese embedding



The Next CEO of Stack OverflowCanonical Vector Bundle associated to a complete intersectionHartshorne proof of adjunction formula proposition II.8.20Normal bundle to complete intersection in $mathbbP^n$Complete Intersection does not lie in a hyperplane?Canonical bundle of the Lagrangian GrassmannianCanonical divisor of smooth complete intersection curve is very ample for genus $g geq 2$.When is the canonical sheaf of a curve very ample?Pullback of line bundle of negative degree has no global sections.Proof of Generalized Bézout theorem using Veronese Embedding mapCanonical bundle of blow up at singular point










3












$begingroup$


Suppose we are given a complete intersection $X$ of codimension $r=n-d$ in $mathbbP^n$ where the degrees of the hypersurfaces are $d_i$ and $d$ is the dimension of $X$. Then the canonical bundle $omega_X=mathcalO_X(sum d_i-n-1)$. Now suppose we embedd $X$ via a Veronese embdding in some $mathbbP^N$ for some $N>>0$ so that one has inclusion $i:Xrightarrow mathbbP^N$. By Hartshorne Proposition 8.20 one can calculate $omega_X$ is this case but what is the normal bundle $mathcalN_X/mathbbP^N$ in this case?










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$
















    3












    $begingroup$


    Suppose we are given a complete intersection $X$ of codimension $r=n-d$ in $mathbbP^n$ where the degrees of the hypersurfaces are $d_i$ and $d$ is the dimension of $X$. Then the canonical bundle $omega_X=mathcalO_X(sum d_i-n-1)$. Now suppose we embedd $X$ via a Veronese embdding in some $mathbbP^N$ for some $N>>0$ so that one has inclusion $i:Xrightarrow mathbbP^N$. By Hartshorne Proposition 8.20 one can calculate $omega_X$ is this case but what is the normal bundle $mathcalN_X/mathbbP^N$ in this case?










    share|cite|improve this question









    $endgroup$














      3












      3








      3





      $begingroup$


      Suppose we are given a complete intersection $X$ of codimension $r=n-d$ in $mathbbP^n$ where the degrees of the hypersurfaces are $d_i$ and $d$ is the dimension of $X$. Then the canonical bundle $omega_X=mathcalO_X(sum d_i-n-1)$. Now suppose we embedd $X$ via a Veronese embdding in some $mathbbP^N$ for some $N>>0$ so that one has inclusion $i:Xrightarrow mathbbP^N$. By Hartshorne Proposition 8.20 one can calculate $omega_X$ is this case but what is the normal bundle $mathcalN_X/mathbbP^N$ in this case?










      share|cite|improve this question









      $endgroup$




      Suppose we are given a complete intersection $X$ of codimension $r=n-d$ in $mathbbP^n$ where the degrees of the hypersurfaces are $d_i$ and $d$ is the dimension of $X$. Then the canonical bundle $omega_X=mathcalO_X(sum d_i-n-1)$. Now suppose we embedd $X$ via a Veronese embdding in some $mathbbP^N$ for some $N>>0$ so that one has inclusion $i:Xrightarrow mathbbP^N$. By Hartshorne Proposition 8.20 one can calculate $omega_X$ is this case but what is the normal bundle $mathcalN_X/mathbbP^N$ in this case?







      algebraic-geometry






      share|cite|improve this question













      share|cite|improve this question











      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question










      asked Dec 27 '13 at 13:55









      user109227user109227

      28916




      28916




















          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          0












          $begingroup$

          Suppose $M$ subset of $Bbb R^m$ is a closed embedded submanifold. if $M$ admits a global defining function, show that is normal bundle is trivial.
          Conversely, if $M$ has trivial normal bundle, show that there is a nighborhood $U$ of $M$ in $Bbb R^n$ and a submersion $K$ from $U$ to $Bbb R^k$ such that $M=K^-1(U)$.






          share|cite|improve this answer











          $endgroup$












          • $begingroup$
            The question is about projective algebraic geometry (over an algebraically closed field, I suppose) What you wrote does not fit that. Already a conic in the projective plane has a non-trivial normal bundle in this context.
            $endgroup$
            – Mariano Suárez-Álvarez
            Jan 31 '16 at 10:45












          Your Answer





          StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
          return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
          StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
          StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
          );
          );
          , "mathjax-editing");

          StackExchange.ready(function()
          var channelOptions =
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "69"
          ;
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
          createEditor();
          );

          else
          createEditor();

          );

          function createEditor()
          StackExchange.prepareEditor(
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
          convertImagesToLinks: true,
          noModals: true,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: 10,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          imageUploader:
          brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
          contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
          allowUrls: true
          ,
          noCode: true, onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          );



          );













          draft saved

          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function ()
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f619596%2fcanonical-bundle-of-veronese-embedding%23new-answer', 'question_page');

          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown

























          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes








          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes









          0












          $begingroup$

          Suppose $M$ subset of $Bbb R^m$ is a closed embedded submanifold. if $M$ admits a global defining function, show that is normal bundle is trivial.
          Conversely, if $M$ has trivial normal bundle, show that there is a nighborhood $U$ of $M$ in $Bbb R^n$ and a submersion $K$ from $U$ to $Bbb R^k$ such that $M=K^-1(U)$.






          share|cite|improve this answer











          $endgroup$












          • $begingroup$
            The question is about projective algebraic geometry (over an algebraically closed field, I suppose) What you wrote does not fit that. Already a conic in the projective plane has a non-trivial normal bundle in this context.
            $endgroup$
            – Mariano Suárez-Álvarez
            Jan 31 '16 at 10:45
















          0












          $begingroup$

          Suppose $M$ subset of $Bbb R^m$ is a closed embedded submanifold. if $M$ admits a global defining function, show that is normal bundle is trivial.
          Conversely, if $M$ has trivial normal bundle, show that there is a nighborhood $U$ of $M$ in $Bbb R^n$ and a submersion $K$ from $U$ to $Bbb R^k$ such that $M=K^-1(U)$.






          share|cite|improve this answer











          $endgroup$












          • $begingroup$
            The question is about projective algebraic geometry (over an algebraically closed field, I suppose) What you wrote does not fit that. Already a conic in the projective plane has a non-trivial normal bundle in this context.
            $endgroup$
            – Mariano Suárez-Álvarez
            Jan 31 '16 at 10:45














          0












          0








          0





          $begingroup$

          Suppose $M$ subset of $Bbb R^m$ is a closed embedded submanifold. if $M$ admits a global defining function, show that is normal bundle is trivial.
          Conversely, if $M$ has trivial normal bundle, show that there is a nighborhood $U$ of $M$ in $Bbb R^n$ and a submersion $K$ from $U$ to $Bbb R^k$ such that $M=K^-1(U)$.






          share|cite|improve this answer











          $endgroup$



          Suppose $M$ subset of $Bbb R^m$ is a closed embedded submanifold. if $M$ admits a global defining function, show that is normal bundle is trivial.
          Conversely, if $M$ has trivial normal bundle, show that there is a nighborhood $U$ of $M$ in $Bbb R^n$ and a submersion $K$ from $U$ to $Bbb R^k$ such that $M=K^-1(U)$.







          share|cite|improve this answer














          share|cite|improve this answer



          share|cite|improve this answer








          edited Mar 18 at 22:07









          Yanior Weg

          2,73211346




          2,73211346










          answered Jan 31 '16 at 9:44









          AliAli

          11




          11











          • $begingroup$
            The question is about projective algebraic geometry (over an algebraically closed field, I suppose) What you wrote does not fit that. Already a conic in the projective plane has a non-trivial normal bundle in this context.
            $endgroup$
            – Mariano Suárez-Álvarez
            Jan 31 '16 at 10:45

















          • $begingroup$
            The question is about projective algebraic geometry (over an algebraically closed field, I suppose) What you wrote does not fit that. Already a conic in the projective plane has a non-trivial normal bundle in this context.
            $endgroup$
            – Mariano Suárez-Álvarez
            Jan 31 '16 at 10:45
















          $begingroup$
          The question is about projective algebraic geometry (over an algebraically closed field, I suppose) What you wrote does not fit that. Already a conic in the projective plane has a non-trivial normal bundle in this context.
          $endgroup$
          – Mariano Suárez-Álvarez
          Jan 31 '16 at 10:45





          $begingroup$
          The question is about projective algebraic geometry (over an algebraically closed field, I suppose) What you wrote does not fit that. Already a conic in the projective plane has a non-trivial normal bundle in this context.
          $endgroup$
          – Mariano Suárez-Álvarez
          Jan 31 '16 at 10:45


















          draft saved

          draft discarded
















































          Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

          But avoid


          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

          Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




          draft saved


          draft discarded














          StackExchange.ready(
          function ()
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f619596%2fcanonical-bundle-of-veronese-embedding%23new-answer', 'question_page');

          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown





















































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown

































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown







          Popular posts from this blog

          How should I support this large drywall patch? Planned maintenance scheduled April 23, 2019 at 00:00UTC (8:00pm US/Eastern) Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara Unicorn Meta Zoo #1: Why another podcast?How do I cover large gaps in drywall?How do I keep drywall around a patch from crumbling?Can I glue a second layer of drywall?How to patch long strip on drywall?Large drywall patch: how to avoid bulging seams?Drywall Mesh Patch vs. Bulge? To remove or not to remove?How to fix this drywall job?Prep drywall before backsplashWhat's the best way to fix this horrible drywall patch job?Drywall patching using 3M Patch Plus Primer

          random experiment with two different functions on unit interval Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara Planned maintenance scheduled April 23, 2019 at 00:00UTC (8:00pm US/Eastern)Random variable and probability space notionsRandom Walk with EdgesFinding functions where the increase over a random interval is Poisson distributedNumber of days until dayCan an observed event in fact be of zero probability?Unit random processmodels of coins and uniform distributionHow to get the number of successes given $n$ trials , probability $P$ and a random variable $X$Absorbing Markov chain in a computer. Is “almost every” turned into always convergence in computer executions?Stopped random walk is not uniformly integrable

          Lowndes Grove History Architecture References Navigation menu32°48′6″N 79°57′58″W / 32.80167°N 79.96611°W / 32.80167; -79.9661132°48′6″N 79°57′58″W / 32.80167°N 79.96611°W / 32.80167; -79.9661178002500"National Register Information System"Historic houses of South Carolina"Lowndes Grove""+32° 48' 6.00", −79° 57' 58.00""Lowndes Grove, Charleston County (260 St. Margaret St., Charleston)""Lowndes Grove"The Charleston ExpositionIt Happened in South Carolina"Lowndes Grove (House), Saint Margaret Street & Sixth Avenue, Charleston, Charleston County, SC(Photographs)"Plantations of the Carolina Low Countrye