Dot in front of file [duplicate]2019 Community Moderator ElectionFilename with dot in frontHow do I specify arguments to return all dot files, but not . and ..?Why are filenames that start with a dot hidden? Can I hide files without using a dot as their first character?replace all dots in filenames with underscoreUsing File Date/Time as Metadata: Reliable?How to handle multi-machine-dot-file-versioningBash script error trying to write to file: no such file or directoryHiding files without affecting the software or operating system's functionalitySymlinking all dot-files and -directoriesTwo dots (..) or two dashes (--) as a delimiter in the names of files and directoriesFilename with dot in front

How could a planet have erratic days?

What is the evidence for the "tyranny of the majority problem" in a direct democracy context?

Add big quotation marks inside my colorbox

Why would a new[] expression ever invoke a destructor?

Quasinilpotent , non-compact operators

Why is this estimator biased?

Temporarily disable WLAN internet access for children, but allow it for adults

What should you do when eye contact makes your subordinate uncomfortable?

Pre-mixing cryogenic fuels and using only one fuel tank

Limits and Infinite Integration by Parts

Non-trope happy ending?

Can a College of Swords bard use a Blade Flourish option on an opportunity attack provoked by their own Dissonant Whispers spell?

Keeping a ball lost forever

How to say when an application is taking the half of your screen on a computer

Probability that THHT occurs in a sequence of 10 coin tosses

Why does the Sun have different day lengths, but not the gas giants?

How do apertures which seem too large to physically fit work?

Redundant comparison & "if" before assignment

Does an advisor owe his/her student anything? Will an advisor keep a PhD student only out of pity?

Can I say "fingers" when referring to toes?

Is aluminum electrical wire used on aircraft?

Angel of Condemnation - Exile creature with second ability

Does the UK parliament need to pass secondary legislation to accept the Article 50 extension

Why "had" in "[something] we would have made had we used [something]"?



Dot in front of file [duplicate]



2019 Community Moderator ElectionFilename with dot in frontHow do I specify arguments to return all dot files, but not . and ..?Why are filenames that start with a dot hidden? Can I hide files without using a dot as their first character?replace all dots in filenames with underscoreUsing File Date/Time as Metadata: Reliable?How to handle multi-machine-dot-file-versioningBash script error trying to write to file: no such file or directoryHiding files without affecting the software or operating system's functionalitySymlinking all dot-files and -directoriesTwo dots (..) or two dashes (--) as a delimiter in the names of files and directoriesFilename with dot in front










4
















This question already has an answer here:



  • Filename with dot in front [duplicate]

    1 answer



If there is a file and the filename starts with a dot in front of it. Does that mean that you created the file and you are hiding stuff in it or can the files get created on their own without you creating the filename. I'm just saying I have files with dots in front of them but I didnt create them.










share|improve this question















marked as duplicate by Stephen Kitt, Jesse_b, Olorin, Rui F Ribeiro, Kusalananda Mar 15 at 10:24


This question has been asked before and already has an answer. If those answers do not fully address your question, please ask a new question.


















  • Hello and welcome to the U&L stack exchange site! Please read over the help center to get more information on how to best post to this site. To get to your question, dotfiles or files starting with a dot character are hidden files. They can used for configuration files for applications you have installed or as profiles for your user settings. What files are you having an issue with? Please edit your post to include more context. Thank you!

    – kemotep
    Mar 14 at 21:52











  • I'm not having a problem with mybfilea never looked at my files I'm getting accused of hiding things in files and also that I have hidden apps and I've never downloaded hidden apps

    – Regina Saucedo
    Mar 14 at 22:00











  • Don't worry and don't let people accuse you of doing covert operations on your file system. Everyone can type in ls -alF in a command shell, and all hiding goes away. BTW you might want to use alias l='ls --color=tty -alF' and with it just type one single l to see it all. Try echo 'set nu' > .vimrc and voila, you've line numbers in your vi or vim editor. That's all there is to it with "hidden" files.

    – Micha
    Mar 14 at 22:36











  • -1 for intentionally asking duplicates.

    – Weijun Zhou
    Mar 15 at 10:47















4
















This question already has an answer here:



  • Filename with dot in front [duplicate]

    1 answer



If there is a file and the filename starts with a dot in front of it. Does that mean that you created the file and you are hiding stuff in it or can the files get created on their own without you creating the filename. I'm just saying I have files with dots in front of them but I didnt create them.










share|improve this question















marked as duplicate by Stephen Kitt, Jesse_b, Olorin, Rui F Ribeiro, Kusalananda Mar 15 at 10:24


This question has been asked before and already has an answer. If those answers do not fully address your question, please ask a new question.


















  • Hello and welcome to the U&L stack exchange site! Please read over the help center to get more information on how to best post to this site. To get to your question, dotfiles or files starting with a dot character are hidden files. They can used for configuration files for applications you have installed or as profiles for your user settings. What files are you having an issue with? Please edit your post to include more context. Thank you!

    – kemotep
    Mar 14 at 21:52











  • I'm not having a problem with mybfilea never looked at my files I'm getting accused of hiding things in files and also that I have hidden apps and I've never downloaded hidden apps

    – Regina Saucedo
    Mar 14 at 22:00











  • Don't worry and don't let people accuse you of doing covert operations on your file system. Everyone can type in ls -alF in a command shell, and all hiding goes away. BTW you might want to use alias l='ls --color=tty -alF' and with it just type one single l to see it all. Try echo 'set nu' > .vimrc and voila, you've line numbers in your vi or vim editor. That's all there is to it with "hidden" files.

    – Micha
    Mar 14 at 22:36











  • -1 for intentionally asking duplicates.

    – Weijun Zhou
    Mar 15 at 10:47













4












4








4









This question already has an answer here:



  • Filename with dot in front [duplicate]

    1 answer



If there is a file and the filename starts with a dot in front of it. Does that mean that you created the file and you are hiding stuff in it or can the files get created on their own without you creating the filename. I'm just saying I have files with dots in front of them but I didnt create them.










share|improve this question

















This question already has an answer here:



  • Filename with dot in front [duplicate]

    1 answer



If there is a file and the filename starts with a dot in front of it. Does that mean that you created the file and you are hiding stuff in it or can the files get created on their own without you creating the filename. I'm just saying I have files with dots in front of them but I didnt create them.





This question already has an answer here:



  • Filename with dot in front [duplicate]

    1 answer







filenames dot-files






share|improve this question















share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited Mar 15 at 10:10









Rui F Ribeiro

41.6k1483141




41.6k1483141










asked Mar 14 at 21:49









Regina SaucedoRegina Saucedo

281




281




marked as duplicate by Stephen Kitt, Jesse_b, Olorin, Rui F Ribeiro, Kusalananda Mar 15 at 10:24


This question has been asked before and already has an answer. If those answers do not fully address your question, please ask a new question.









marked as duplicate by Stephen Kitt, Jesse_b, Olorin, Rui F Ribeiro, Kusalananda Mar 15 at 10:24


This question has been asked before and already has an answer. If those answers do not fully address your question, please ask a new question.














  • Hello and welcome to the U&L stack exchange site! Please read over the help center to get more information on how to best post to this site. To get to your question, dotfiles or files starting with a dot character are hidden files. They can used for configuration files for applications you have installed or as profiles for your user settings. What files are you having an issue with? Please edit your post to include more context. Thank you!

    – kemotep
    Mar 14 at 21:52











  • I'm not having a problem with mybfilea never looked at my files I'm getting accused of hiding things in files and also that I have hidden apps and I've never downloaded hidden apps

    – Regina Saucedo
    Mar 14 at 22:00











  • Don't worry and don't let people accuse you of doing covert operations on your file system. Everyone can type in ls -alF in a command shell, and all hiding goes away. BTW you might want to use alias l='ls --color=tty -alF' and with it just type one single l to see it all. Try echo 'set nu' > .vimrc and voila, you've line numbers in your vi or vim editor. That's all there is to it with "hidden" files.

    – Micha
    Mar 14 at 22:36











  • -1 for intentionally asking duplicates.

    – Weijun Zhou
    Mar 15 at 10:47

















  • Hello and welcome to the U&L stack exchange site! Please read over the help center to get more information on how to best post to this site. To get to your question, dotfiles or files starting with a dot character are hidden files. They can used for configuration files for applications you have installed or as profiles for your user settings. What files are you having an issue with? Please edit your post to include more context. Thank you!

    – kemotep
    Mar 14 at 21:52











  • I'm not having a problem with mybfilea never looked at my files I'm getting accused of hiding things in files and also that I have hidden apps and I've never downloaded hidden apps

    – Regina Saucedo
    Mar 14 at 22:00











  • Don't worry and don't let people accuse you of doing covert operations on your file system. Everyone can type in ls -alF in a command shell, and all hiding goes away. BTW you might want to use alias l='ls --color=tty -alF' and with it just type one single l to see it all. Try echo 'set nu' > .vimrc and voila, you've line numbers in your vi or vim editor. That's all there is to it with "hidden" files.

    – Micha
    Mar 14 at 22:36











  • -1 for intentionally asking duplicates.

    – Weijun Zhou
    Mar 15 at 10:47
















Hello and welcome to the U&L stack exchange site! Please read over the help center to get more information on how to best post to this site. To get to your question, dotfiles or files starting with a dot character are hidden files. They can used for configuration files for applications you have installed or as profiles for your user settings. What files are you having an issue with? Please edit your post to include more context. Thank you!

– kemotep
Mar 14 at 21:52





Hello and welcome to the U&L stack exchange site! Please read over the help center to get more information on how to best post to this site. To get to your question, dotfiles or files starting with a dot character are hidden files. They can used for configuration files for applications you have installed or as profiles for your user settings. What files are you having an issue with? Please edit your post to include more context. Thank you!

– kemotep
Mar 14 at 21:52













I'm not having a problem with mybfilea never looked at my files I'm getting accused of hiding things in files and also that I have hidden apps and I've never downloaded hidden apps

– Regina Saucedo
Mar 14 at 22:00





I'm not having a problem with mybfilea never looked at my files I'm getting accused of hiding things in files and also that I have hidden apps and I've never downloaded hidden apps

– Regina Saucedo
Mar 14 at 22:00













Don't worry and don't let people accuse you of doing covert operations on your file system. Everyone can type in ls -alF in a command shell, and all hiding goes away. BTW you might want to use alias l='ls --color=tty -alF' and with it just type one single l to see it all. Try echo 'set nu' > .vimrc and voila, you've line numbers in your vi or vim editor. That's all there is to it with "hidden" files.

– Micha
Mar 14 at 22:36





Don't worry and don't let people accuse you of doing covert operations on your file system. Everyone can type in ls -alF in a command shell, and all hiding goes away. BTW you might want to use alias l='ls --color=tty -alF' and with it just type one single l to see it all. Try echo 'set nu' > .vimrc and voila, you've line numbers in your vi or vim editor. That's all there is to it with "hidden" files.

– Micha
Mar 14 at 22:36













-1 for intentionally asking duplicates.

– Weijun Zhou
Mar 15 at 10:47





-1 for intentionally asking duplicates.

– Weijun Zhou
Mar 15 at 10:47










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















15














This can likely be explained by a google post by Rob Pike about the origin of hidden files.



In the early days of Unix there was no concept of hidden files but the files . and .. existed to represent the current directory and parent directory. It became annoying to list these files every time ls was used so a simple change was made to the ls program to hide any file beginning with a .. This change, had the unplanned effect of allowing for "hidden files".



As Rob Pike explains:




As a consequence, more lazy programmers started dropping files into everyone's home directory. I don't have all that much stuff installed on the machine I'm using to type this, but my home directory has about a hundred dot files and I don't even know what most of them are or whether they're still needed. Every file name evaluation that goes through my home directory is slowed down by this accumulated sludge.





So to answer your question those hidden files you didn't create are likely some sort of config files from applications you have installed.






share|improve this answer























  • ... but my home directory has about a hundred dot files and I don't even know what most of them are or whether they're still needed - Glad to know I am not the only one! There is a light at the end of the tunnel, there is movement to placing all user config files into .local but not many applications follow this spec.

    – crasic
    Mar 15 at 6:57












  • Heck, even on Windows (where those files are not automatically hidden and there's a defined and preferred place for such configuration to go into) I have currently 12 directories and 3 files beginning with a . in my profile directory. And I clean up those I don't recognize about once a month.

    – Joey
    Mar 15 at 7:19











  • @crasic I guess you mean $HOME/.config which is for config files according to the freedesktop specification you linked. $HOME/.local is for "User specific data files". Actually quite a lot of applications are already using $HOME/.config by default or can be configured to use it, although it's still a long way till we can get rid of all the dotfiles in $HOME.

    – David Ongaro
    Mar 15 at 9:16











  • Btw. this seems to be a nice overview of software which adheres the XDG base directory specification or can be configured to adhere it: wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/XDG_Base_Directory#Support

    – David Ongaro
    Mar 15 at 9:34

















1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes








1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes









15














This can likely be explained by a google post by Rob Pike about the origin of hidden files.



In the early days of Unix there was no concept of hidden files but the files . and .. existed to represent the current directory and parent directory. It became annoying to list these files every time ls was used so a simple change was made to the ls program to hide any file beginning with a .. This change, had the unplanned effect of allowing for "hidden files".



As Rob Pike explains:




As a consequence, more lazy programmers started dropping files into everyone's home directory. I don't have all that much stuff installed on the machine I'm using to type this, but my home directory has about a hundred dot files and I don't even know what most of them are or whether they're still needed. Every file name evaluation that goes through my home directory is slowed down by this accumulated sludge.





So to answer your question those hidden files you didn't create are likely some sort of config files from applications you have installed.






share|improve this answer























  • ... but my home directory has about a hundred dot files and I don't even know what most of them are or whether they're still needed - Glad to know I am not the only one! There is a light at the end of the tunnel, there is movement to placing all user config files into .local but not many applications follow this spec.

    – crasic
    Mar 15 at 6:57












  • Heck, even on Windows (where those files are not automatically hidden and there's a defined and preferred place for such configuration to go into) I have currently 12 directories and 3 files beginning with a . in my profile directory. And I clean up those I don't recognize about once a month.

    – Joey
    Mar 15 at 7:19











  • @crasic I guess you mean $HOME/.config which is for config files according to the freedesktop specification you linked. $HOME/.local is for "User specific data files". Actually quite a lot of applications are already using $HOME/.config by default or can be configured to use it, although it's still a long way till we can get rid of all the dotfiles in $HOME.

    – David Ongaro
    Mar 15 at 9:16











  • Btw. this seems to be a nice overview of software which adheres the XDG base directory specification or can be configured to adhere it: wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/XDG_Base_Directory#Support

    – David Ongaro
    Mar 15 at 9:34















15














This can likely be explained by a google post by Rob Pike about the origin of hidden files.



In the early days of Unix there was no concept of hidden files but the files . and .. existed to represent the current directory and parent directory. It became annoying to list these files every time ls was used so a simple change was made to the ls program to hide any file beginning with a .. This change, had the unplanned effect of allowing for "hidden files".



As Rob Pike explains:




As a consequence, more lazy programmers started dropping files into everyone's home directory. I don't have all that much stuff installed on the machine I'm using to type this, but my home directory has about a hundred dot files and I don't even know what most of them are or whether they're still needed. Every file name evaluation that goes through my home directory is slowed down by this accumulated sludge.





So to answer your question those hidden files you didn't create are likely some sort of config files from applications you have installed.






share|improve this answer























  • ... but my home directory has about a hundred dot files and I don't even know what most of them are or whether they're still needed - Glad to know I am not the only one! There is a light at the end of the tunnel, there is movement to placing all user config files into .local but not many applications follow this spec.

    – crasic
    Mar 15 at 6:57












  • Heck, even on Windows (where those files are not automatically hidden and there's a defined and preferred place for such configuration to go into) I have currently 12 directories and 3 files beginning with a . in my profile directory. And I clean up those I don't recognize about once a month.

    – Joey
    Mar 15 at 7:19











  • @crasic I guess you mean $HOME/.config which is for config files according to the freedesktop specification you linked. $HOME/.local is for "User specific data files". Actually quite a lot of applications are already using $HOME/.config by default or can be configured to use it, although it's still a long way till we can get rid of all the dotfiles in $HOME.

    – David Ongaro
    Mar 15 at 9:16











  • Btw. this seems to be a nice overview of software which adheres the XDG base directory specification or can be configured to adhere it: wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/XDG_Base_Directory#Support

    – David Ongaro
    Mar 15 at 9:34













15












15








15







This can likely be explained by a google post by Rob Pike about the origin of hidden files.



In the early days of Unix there was no concept of hidden files but the files . and .. existed to represent the current directory and parent directory. It became annoying to list these files every time ls was used so a simple change was made to the ls program to hide any file beginning with a .. This change, had the unplanned effect of allowing for "hidden files".



As Rob Pike explains:




As a consequence, more lazy programmers started dropping files into everyone's home directory. I don't have all that much stuff installed on the machine I'm using to type this, but my home directory has about a hundred dot files and I don't even know what most of them are or whether they're still needed. Every file name evaluation that goes through my home directory is slowed down by this accumulated sludge.





So to answer your question those hidden files you didn't create are likely some sort of config files from applications you have installed.






share|improve this answer













This can likely be explained by a google post by Rob Pike about the origin of hidden files.



In the early days of Unix there was no concept of hidden files but the files . and .. existed to represent the current directory and parent directory. It became annoying to list these files every time ls was used so a simple change was made to the ls program to hide any file beginning with a .. This change, had the unplanned effect of allowing for "hidden files".



As Rob Pike explains:




As a consequence, more lazy programmers started dropping files into everyone's home directory. I don't have all that much stuff installed on the machine I'm using to type this, but my home directory has about a hundred dot files and I don't even know what most of them are or whether they're still needed. Every file name evaluation that goes through my home directory is slowed down by this accumulated sludge.





So to answer your question those hidden files you didn't create are likely some sort of config files from applications you have installed.







share|improve this answer












share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer










answered Mar 14 at 21:59









Jesse_bJesse_b

13.8k23471




13.8k23471












  • ... but my home directory has about a hundred dot files and I don't even know what most of them are or whether they're still needed - Glad to know I am not the only one! There is a light at the end of the tunnel, there is movement to placing all user config files into .local but not many applications follow this spec.

    – crasic
    Mar 15 at 6:57












  • Heck, even on Windows (where those files are not automatically hidden and there's a defined and preferred place for such configuration to go into) I have currently 12 directories and 3 files beginning with a . in my profile directory. And I clean up those I don't recognize about once a month.

    – Joey
    Mar 15 at 7:19











  • @crasic I guess you mean $HOME/.config which is for config files according to the freedesktop specification you linked. $HOME/.local is for "User specific data files". Actually quite a lot of applications are already using $HOME/.config by default or can be configured to use it, although it's still a long way till we can get rid of all the dotfiles in $HOME.

    – David Ongaro
    Mar 15 at 9:16











  • Btw. this seems to be a nice overview of software which adheres the XDG base directory specification or can be configured to adhere it: wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/XDG_Base_Directory#Support

    – David Ongaro
    Mar 15 at 9:34

















  • ... but my home directory has about a hundred dot files and I don't even know what most of them are or whether they're still needed - Glad to know I am not the only one! There is a light at the end of the tunnel, there is movement to placing all user config files into .local but not many applications follow this spec.

    – crasic
    Mar 15 at 6:57












  • Heck, even on Windows (where those files are not automatically hidden and there's a defined and preferred place for such configuration to go into) I have currently 12 directories and 3 files beginning with a . in my profile directory. And I clean up those I don't recognize about once a month.

    – Joey
    Mar 15 at 7:19











  • @crasic I guess you mean $HOME/.config which is for config files according to the freedesktop specification you linked. $HOME/.local is for "User specific data files". Actually quite a lot of applications are already using $HOME/.config by default or can be configured to use it, although it's still a long way till we can get rid of all the dotfiles in $HOME.

    – David Ongaro
    Mar 15 at 9:16











  • Btw. this seems to be a nice overview of software which adheres the XDG base directory specification or can be configured to adhere it: wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/XDG_Base_Directory#Support

    – David Ongaro
    Mar 15 at 9:34
















... but my home directory has about a hundred dot files and I don't even know what most of them are or whether they're still needed - Glad to know I am not the only one! There is a light at the end of the tunnel, there is movement to placing all user config files into .local but not many applications follow this spec.

– crasic
Mar 15 at 6:57






... but my home directory has about a hundred dot files and I don't even know what most of them are or whether they're still needed - Glad to know I am not the only one! There is a light at the end of the tunnel, there is movement to placing all user config files into .local but not many applications follow this spec.

– crasic
Mar 15 at 6:57














Heck, even on Windows (where those files are not automatically hidden and there's a defined and preferred place for such configuration to go into) I have currently 12 directories and 3 files beginning with a . in my profile directory. And I clean up those I don't recognize about once a month.

– Joey
Mar 15 at 7:19





Heck, even on Windows (where those files are not automatically hidden and there's a defined and preferred place for such configuration to go into) I have currently 12 directories and 3 files beginning with a . in my profile directory. And I clean up those I don't recognize about once a month.

– Joey
Mar 15 at 7:19













@crasic I guess you mean $HOME/.config which is for config files according to the freedesktop specification you linked. $HOME/.local is for "User specific data files". Actually quite a lot of applications are already using $HOME/.config by default or can be configured to use it, although it's still a long way till we can get rid of all the dotfiles in $HOME.

– David Ongaro
Mar 15 at 9:16





@crasic I guess you mean $HOME/.config which is for config files according to the freedesktop specification you linked. $HOME/.local is for "User specific data files". Actually quite a lot of applications are already using $HOME/.config by default or can be configured to use it, although it's still a long way till we can get rid of all the dotfiles in $HOME.

– David Ongaro
Mar 15 at 9:16













Btw. this seems to be a nice overview of software which adheres the XDG base directory specification or can be configured to adhere it: wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/XDG_Base_Directory#Support

– David Ongaro
Mar 15 at 9:34





Btw. this seems to be a nice overview of software which adheres the XDG base directory specification or can be configured to adhere it: wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/XDG_Base_Directory#Support

– David Ongaro
Mar 15 at 9:34



Popular posts from this blog

Moe incest case Sentencing See also References Navigation menu"'Australian Josef Fritzl' fathered four children by daughter""Small town recoils in horror at 'Australian Fritzl' incest case""Victorian rape allegations echo Fritzl case - Just In (Australian Broadcasting Corporation)""Incest father jailed for 22 years""'Australian Fritzl' sentenced to 22 years in prison for abusing daughter for three decades""RSJ v The Queen"

Who is our nearest planetary neighbor, on average?Santa Claus flies to the South PoleSeven Spheres of Unequal Mass, a weighing problem with a twistDescribe a large integerFast Mental Calculation of $7.5^7$Math in Space (without the help of celebrities)Find the value of $bigstar$: Puzzle 8 - InequalityWho drinks beer while running anyway?A Crucial DeliveryRanking And AverageHow long will my money last at roulette?

Daza language Contents Vocabulary Phonology References External links Navigation menudaza1242Daza"Dazaga"eeee178086576