Current sense amplifier + op-amp buffer + ADC: Measuring down to 0 with a single supplyHaving the same source for power supply and positive input for a single-supply buffer amplifiermeasuring current sense resistorsInterfacing Current shunt monitor with 16bit ADCHow does an ADC with an unequal split supply work?How to measure the current delivered to the load by a high voltage (>50 V) non-inverting op amp amplifier?DAC based voltage supply (current buffered) with current monitoring: shorting/instability?How to calculate the value of a current sense resistor for use with an ADC?Output to ground rail on single-supply op-amp with grounded loadIs a buffer needed to measure the output of a power supply using an ADC?Single supply op amp with input attenuator

Angel of Condemnation - Exile creature with second ability

Is aluminum electrical wire used on aircraft?

The IT department bottlenecks progress. How should I handle this?

Why does the Sun have different day lengths, but not the gas giants?

Can I say "fingers" when referring to toes?

Open a doc from terminal, but not by its name

On a tidally locked planet, would time be quantized?

Multiplicative persistence

Mixing PEX brands

Why is so much work done on numerical verification of the Riemann Hypothesis?

PTIJ: Haman's bad computer

Does malloc reserve more space while allocating memory?

Can the US President recognize Israel’s sovereignty over the Golan Heights for the USA or does that need an act of Congress?

Is this toilet slogan correct usage of the English language?

What if a revenant (monster) gains fire resistance?

Does Doodling or Improvising on the Piano Have Any Benefits?

Why does AES have exactly 10 rounds for a 128-bit key, 12 for 192 bits and 14 for a 256-bit key size?

What happens if you are holding an Iron Flask with a demon inside and walk into an Antimagic Field?

Are Captain Marvel's powers affected by Thanos' actions in Infinity War

Why can Carol Danvers change her suit colours in the first place?

What exact color does ozone gas have?

Picking the different solutions to the time independent Schrodinger eqaution

Unexpected behavior of the procedure `Area` on the object 'Polygon'

What does "Scientists rise up against statistical significance" mean? (Comment in Nature)



Current sense amplifier + op-amp buffer + ADC: Measuring down to 0 with a single supply


Having the same source for power supply and positive input for a single-supply buffer amplifiermeasuring current sense resistorsInterfacing Current shunt monitor with 16bit ADCHow does an ADC with an unequal split supply work?How to measure the current delivered to the load by a high voltage (>50 V) non-inverting op amp amplifier?DAC based voltage supply (current buffered) with current monitoring: shorting/instability?How to calculate the value of a current sense resistor for use with an ADC?Output to ground rail on single-supply op-amp with grounded loadIs a buffer needed to measure the output of a power supply using an ADC?Single supply op amp with input attenuator













6












$begingroup$


I'm thinking about current sensing with a high dynamic range (10 mA - 20 A) and using LTC6102 as a high-side current sense amp (the voltage would be 54.6 V max, a 13S6P Li-ion battery).



The ADC I'm planning to use is LTC1407 (12-bit 1.5 MS/s).



I am planning to use OPA2365 as a unity-gain buffer between the current-sense amplifier and the ADC.



The current-sense amplifier provides an output current proportional to the sense voltage and given the high voltage and small package size, the output current has to be 1 mA full scale which requires a rather high value output resistor and thus a buffer is needed between the current-sense amplifier and the ADC.



The op-amp requires a small (-0.1 V) negative supply for the output to go down to 0 and it's important to go down to 0 in my case because of the high dynamic range I want.



I could try and do a negative supply e.g. a crude one with an additional battery between ground and the negative supply of the op-amp, but I would rather avoid it to simplify the circuit.



Is there a way that I can measure down to 0 without a negative supply voltage for the op-amp in this case?



I'm thinking of maybe putting a diode in series with the output resistor of the current-sense amp to offset the output voltage and then correct the scale of the ADC output accordingly, but I'm not sure if this will work. For low currents the diode would be in the region where small current changes would cause comparable voltage changes I suppose.










share|improve this question











$endgroup$







  • 4




    $begingroup$
    There are little charge pump IC intended to produce just a little negative voltage for things like this. From either Analog Devices, TI, or Linear. I don't remember.
    $endgroup$
    – Toor
    Mar 14 at 23:04











  • $begingroup$
    No offsets will work, as going down to true zero volts is a function of the op-amps output stage. Some rail-to-rail op-amps can get down to within 100mV of zero, but it is very easy to create a negative voltage from a TLC555 timer and some 1N4148 diodes. You cannot have what you want without some type of compromise.
    $endgroup$
    – Sparky256
    Mar 14 at 23:05










  • $begingroup$
    ti.com/product/TPS60403
    $endgroup$
    – Toor
    Mar 14 at 23:06










  • $begingroup$
    You have selected a differential ADC, you could use a slightly elevated voltage as the OPA2365 reference and for the ADC negative input, like 0.2V.
    $endgroup$
    – pserra
    Mar 14 at 23:11
















6












$begingroup$


I'm thinking about current sensing with a high dynamic range (10 mA - 20 A) and using LTC6102 as a high-side current sense amp (the voltage would be 54.6 V max, a 13S6P Li-ion battery).



The ADC I'm planning to use is LTC1407 (12-bit 1.5 MS/s).



I am planning to use OPA2365 as a unity-gain buffer between the current-sense amplifier and the ADC.



The current-sense amplifier provides an output current proportional to the sense voltage and given the high voltage and small package size, the output current has to be 1 mA full scale which requires a rather high value output resistor and thus a buffer is needed between the current-sense amplifier and the ADC.



The op-amp requires a small (-0.1 V) negative supply for the output to go down to 0 and it's important to go down to 0 in my case because of the high dynamic range I want.



I could try and do a negative supply e.g. a crude one with an additional battery between ground and the negative supply of the op-amp, but I would rather avoid it to simplify the circuit.



Is there a way that I can measure down to 0 without a negative supply voltage for the op-amp in this case?



I'm thinking of maybe putting a diode in series with the output resistor of the current-sense amp to offset the output voltage and then correct the scale of the ADC output accordingly, but I'm not sure if this will work. For low currents the diode would be in the region where small current changes would cause comparable voltage changes I suppose.










share|improve this question











$endgroup$







  • 4




    $begingroup$
    There are little charge pump IC intended to produce just a little negative voltage for things like this. From either Analog Devices, TI, or Linear. I don't remember.
    $endgroup$
    – Toor
    Mar 14 at 23:04











  • $begingroup$
    No offsets will work, as going down to true zero volts is a function of the op-amps output stage. Some rail-to-rail op-amps can get down to within 100mV of zero, but it is very easy to create a negative voltage from a TLC555 timer and some 1N4148 diodes. You cannot have what you want without some type of compromise.
    $endgroup$
    – Sparky256
    Mar 14 at 23:05










  • $begingroup$
    ti.com/product/TPS60403
    $endgroup$
    – Toor
    Mar 14 at 23:06










  • $begingroup$
    You have selected a differential ADC, you could use a slightly elevated voltage as the OPA2365 reference and for the ADC negative input, like 0.2V.
    $endgroup$
    – pserra
    Mar 14 at 23:11














6












6








6


4



$begingroup$


I'm thinking about current sensing with a high dynamic range (10 mA - 20 A) and using LTC6102 as a high-side current sense amp (the voltage would be 54.6 V max, a 13S6P Li-ion battery).



The ADC I'm planning to use is LTC1407 (12-bit 1.5 MS/s).



I am planning to use OPA2365 as a unity-gain buffer between the current-sense amplifier and the ADC.



The current-sense amplifier provides an output current proportional to the sense voltage and given the high voltage and small package size, the output current has to be 1 mA full scale which requires a rather high value output resistor and thus a buffer is needed between the current-sense amplifier and the ADC.



The op-amp requires a small (-0.1 V) negative supply for the output to go down to 0 and it's important to go down to 0 in my case because of the high dynamic range I want.



I could try and do a negative supply e.g. a crude one with an additional battery between ground and the negative supply of the op-amp, but I would rather avoid it to simplify the circuit.



Is there a way that I can measure down to 0 without a negative supply voltage for the op-amp in this case?



I'm thinking of maybe putting a diode in series with the output resistor of the current-sense amp to offset the output voltage and then correct the scale of the ADC output accordingly, but I'm not sure if this will work. For low currents the diode would be in the region where small current changes would cause comparable voltage changes I suppose.










share|improve this question











$endgroup$




I'm thinking about current sensing with a high dynamic range (10 mA - 20 A) and using LTC6102 as a high-side current sense amp (the voltage would be 54.6 V max, a 13S6P Li-ion battery).



The ADC I'm planning to use is LTC1407 (12-bit 1.5 MS/s).



I am planning to use OPA2365 as a unity-gain buffer between the current-sense amplifier and the ADC.



The current-sense amplifier provides an output current proportional to the sense voltage and given the high voltage and small package size, the output current has to be 1 mA full scale which requires a rather high value output resistor and thus a buffer is needed between the current-sense amplifier and the ADC.



The op-amp requires a small (-0.1 V) negative supply for the output to go down to 0 and it's important to go down to 0 in my case because of the high dynamic range I want.



I could try and do a negative supply e.g. a crude one with an additional battery between ground and the negative supply of the op-amp, but I would rather avoid it to simplify the circuit.



Is there a way that I can measure down to 0 without a negative supply voltage for the op-amp in this case?



I'm thinking of maybe putting a diode in series with the output resistor of the current-sense amp to offset the output voltage and then correct the scale of the ADC output accordingly, but I'm not sure if this will work. For low currents the diode would be in the region where small current changes would cause comparable voltage changes I suppose.







operational-amplifier adc current-measurement single-supply-op-amp






share|improve this question















share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited Mar 15 at 18:44









Peter Mortensen

1,60031422




1,60031422










asked Mar 14 at 22:56









axkaxk

404416




404416







  • 4




    $begingroup$
    There are little charge pump IC intended to produce just a little negative voltage for things like this. From either Analog Devices, TI, or Linear. I don't remember.
    $endgroup$
    – Toor
    Mar 14 at 23:04











  • $begingroup$
    No offsets will work, as going down to true zero volts is a function of the op-amps output stage. Some rail-to-rail op-amps can get down to within 100mV of zero, but it is very easy to create a negative voltage from a TLC555 timer and some 1N4148 diodes. You cannot have what you want without some type of compromise.
    $endgroup$
    – Sparky256
    Mar 14 at 23:05










  • $begingroup$
    ti.com/product/TPS60403
    $endgroup$
    – Toor
    Mar 14 at 23:06










  • $begingroup$
    You have selected a differential ADC, you could use a slightly elevated voltage as the OPA2365 reference and for the ADC negative input, like 0.2V.
    $endgroup$
    – pserra
    Mar 14 at 23:11













  • 4




    $begingroup$
    There are little charge pump IC intended to produce just a little negative voltage for things like this. From either Analog Devices, TI, or Linear. I don't remember.
    $endgroup$
    – Toor
    Mar 14 at 23:04











  • $begingroup$
    No offsets will work, as going down to true zero volts is a function of the op-amps output stage. Some rail-to-rail op-amps can get down to within 100mV of zero, but it is very easy to create a negative voltage from a TLC555 timer and some 1N4148 diodes. You cannot have what you want without some type of compromise.
    $endgroup$
    – Sparky256
    Mar 14 at 23:05










  • $begingroup$
    ti.com/product/TPS60403
    $endgroup$
    – Toor
    Mar 14 at 23:06










  • $begingroup$
    You have selected a differential ADC, you could use a slightly elevated voltage as the OPA2365 reference and for the ADC negative input, like 0.2V.
    $endgroup$
    – pserra
    Mar 14 at 23:11








4




4




$begingroup$
There are little charge pump IC intended to produce just a little negative voltage for things like this. From either Analog Devices, TI, or Linear. I don't remember.
$endgroup$
– Toor
Mar 14 at 23:04





$begingroup$
There are little charge pump IC intended to produce just a little negative voltage for things like this. From either Analog Devices, TI, or Linear. I don't remember.
$endgroup$
– Toor
Mar 14 at 23:04













$begingroup$
No offsets will work, as going down to true zero volts is a function of the op-amps output stage. Some rail-to-rail op-amps can get down to within 100mV of zero, but it is very easy to create a negative voltage from a TLC555 timer and some 1N4148 diodes. You cannot have what you want without some type of compromise.
$endgroup$
– Sparky256
Mar 14 at 23:05




$begingroup$
No offsets will work, as going down to true zero volts is a function of the op-amps output stage. Some rail-to-rail op-amps can get down to within 100mV of zero, but it is very easy to create a negative voltage from a TLC555 timer and some 1N4148 diodes. You cannot have what you want without some type of compromise.
$endgroup$
– Sparky256
Mar 14 at 23:05












$begingroup$
ti.com/product/TPS60403
$endgroup$
– Toor
Mar 14 at 23:06




$begingroup$
ti.com/product/TPS60403
$endgroup$
– Toor
Mar 14 at 23:06












$begingroup$
You have selected a differential ADC, you could use a slightly elevated voltage as the OPA2365 reference and for the ADC negative input, like 0.2V.
$endgroup$
– pserra
Mar 14 at 23:11





$begingroup$
You have selected a differential ADC, you could use a slightly elevated voltage as the OPA2365 reference and for the ADC negative input, like 0.2V.
$endgroup$
– pserra
Mar 14 at 23:11











3 Answers
3






active

oldest

votes


















12












$begingroup$

You can get a small negative voltage by using an LM7705 which produces -232mV nominal output voltage using a charge pump.



enter image description here



The advantage of using that part over a typical garden-variety inverting charge pump converter (eg. +5 to -5) or inverting boost converter is that the worst-case negative output voltage generally falls within the maximum negative input voltage of something like your ADC converter (-300mV in your case, which is typical), so you don't need to try to clamp the op-amp output/ADC input voltage near ground.



On the other hand, it's probably more expensive than some other solutions that would take more engineering effort, so this is just one of many possibilities.






share|improve this answer









$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    How do I estimate the impact of the switching noise of the charge pump on the performance of the op-amp? Should I look at the op-amp's PSRR?
    $endgroup$
    – axk
    Mar 15 at 0:06










  • $begingroup$
    Output Voltage Ripple 4 mVpp 91kHz OPA365 60dB PSRR
    $endgroup$
    – Sunnyskyguy EE75
    Mar 15 at 0:56











  • $begingroup$
    Yes, Tony gave you the parameters. Of course you can filter it further if you need to.
    $endgroup$
    – Spehro Pefhany
    Mar 15 at 1:07






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Package has external pins on 0.5mm centers, very easy to solder in many ways.
    $endgroup$
    – Sparky256
    Mar 15 at 1:16


















4












$begingroup$

You could generate a small positive voltage, and use it as a virtual ground. Since you selected a differential ADC, its large common mode rejection can allow you to get away with a very simple way of generating that 0.2V reference voltage.





schematic





simulate this circuit – Schematic created using CircuitLab






share|improve this answer









$endgroup$




















    -3












    $begingroup$

    Others have given some tips, but you need to be aware that what you're trying to do a very iffy deal. The problem is that, effectively, you're trying to do





    schematic





    simulate this circuit – Schematic created using CircuitLab



    The problem with this is that it's not accurate. You see those grounds? Trust me, at 20 amps, they are not all at the same voltage. For the current levels you're talking about, stray resistance will be a big problem. It will depend critically on pc layout and system wiring. For that matter, since copper has a rather large resistance tempco, you may have problems with temperature sensitivity due to your stray resistances changing. If you have any other part of the system which draws much current, the issue can become even worse.



    Assuming that you are using a very small sense resistor, with small voltages produced in order to avoid large power dissipation in your resistor, I would really recommend a differential measurement, also called a Kelvin connection.





    schematic





    simulate this circuit



    where your amplifier is an instrumentation or differential amplifier.



    Trust me on this, single-ended current measurement, other than very crude limit sensing, is a recipe for heartbreak. Trying to do it with a single-supply amplifier only makes it worse.






    share|improve this answer









    $endgroup$








    • 3




      $begingroup$
      -1 The problems you state are valid, but does not solve the question at all. He is already using a differential amplifier, and he wants to know how to measure close to GND which you solved by placing V2, but you skipped how that was implemented.
      $endgroup$
      – Linkyyy
      Mar 15 at 8:07






    • 1




      $begingroup$
      Unless I misread the question, the OP is talking about high-side current sense, your schematic is low-side.
      $endgroup$
      – Dmitry Grigoryev
      Mar 15 at 9:02










    • $begingroup$
      My understanding is that when I'm doing high-side current sensing the big current will go through the sense resistor only and I'm planning to use 5mR or 10mR 5W resistor or 2 of 10mR 5W in parallel and it rarely actually reaches the peak of 20A so I hope I should be fine. I estimate the consumption of the circuit with all digital stuff and a bluetooth transmitter should be no more than 70mA.
      $endgroup$
      – axk
      Mar 15 at 9:42











    Your Answer





    StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
    return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
    StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
    StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["\$", "\$"]]);
    );
    );
    , "mathjax-editing");

    StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
    return StackExchange.using("schematics", function ()
    StackExchange.schematics.init();
    );
    , "cicuitlab");

    StackExchange.ready(function()
    var channelOptions =
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "135"
    ;
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
    createEditor();
    );

    else
    createEditor();

    );

    function createEditor()
    StackExchange.prepareEditor(
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
    convertImagesToLinks: false,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: null,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader:
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    ,
    onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    );



    );













    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function ()
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2felectronics.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f427315%2fcurrent-sense-amplifier-op-amp-buffer-adc-measuring-down-to-0-with-a-single%23new-answer', 'question_page');

    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    3 Answers
    3






    active

    oldest

    votes








    3 Answers
    3






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    12












    $begingroup$

    You can get a small negative voltage by using an LM7705 which produces -232mV nominal output voltage using a charge pump.



    enter image description here



    The advantage of using that part over a typical garden-variety inverting charge pump converter (eg. +5 to -5) or inverting boost converter is that the worst-case negative output voltage generally falls within the maximum negative input voltage of something like your ADC converter (-300mV in your case, which is typical), so you don't need to try to clamp the op-amp output/ADC input voltage near ground.



    On the other hand, it's probably more expensive than some other solutions that would take more engineering effort, so this is just one of many possibilities.






    share|improve this answer









    $endgroup$












    • $begingroup$
      How do I estimate the impact of the switching noise of the charge pump on the performance of the op-amp? Should I look at the op-amp's PSRR?
      $endgroup$
      – axk
      Mar 15 at 0:06










    • $begingroup$
      Output Voltage Ripple 4 mVpp 91kHz OPA365 60dB PSRR
      $endgroup$
      – Sunnyskyguy EE75
      Mar 15 at 0:56











    • $begingroup$
      Yes, Tony gave you the parameters. Of course you can filter it further if you need to.
      $endgroup$
      – Spehro Pefhany
      Mar 15 at 1:07






    • 1




      $begingroup$
      Package has external pins on 0.5mm centers, very easy to solder in many ways.
      $endgroup$
      – Sparky256
      Mar 15 at 1:16















    12












    $begingroup$

    You can get a small negative voltage by using an LM7705 which produces -232mV nominal output voltage using a charge pump.



    enter image description here



    The advantage of using that part over a typical garden-variety inverting charge pump converter (eg. +5 to -5) or inverting boost converter is that the worst-case negative output voltage generally falls within the maximum negative input voltage of something like your ADC converter (-300mV in your case, which is typical), so you don't need to try to clamp the op-amp output/ADC input voltage near ground.



    On the other hand, it's probably more expensive than some other solutions that would take more engineering effort, so this is just one of many possibilities.






    share|improve this answer









    $endgroup$












    • $begingroup$
      How do I estimate the impact of the switching noise of the charge pump on the performance of the op-amp? Should I look at the op-amp's PSRR?
      $endgroup$
      – axk
      Mar 15 at 0:06










    • $begingroup$
      Output Voltage Ripple 4 mVpp 91kHz OPA365 60dB PSRR
      $endgroup$
      – Sunnyskyguy EE75
      Mar 15 at 0:56











    • $begingroup$
      Yes, Tony gave you the parameters. Of course you can filter it further if you need to.
      $endgroup$
      – Spehro Pefhany
      Mar 15 at 1:07






    • 1




      $begingroup$
      Package has external pins on 0.5mm centers, very easy to solder in many ways.
      $endgroup$
      – Sparky256
      Mar 15 at 1:16













    12












    12








    12





    $begingroup$

    You can get a small negative voltage by using an LM7705 which produces -232mV nominal output voltage using a charge pump.



    enter image description here



    The advantage of using that part over a typical garden-variety inverting charge pump converter (eg. +5 to -5) or inverting boost converter is that the worst-case negative output voltage generally falls within the maximum negative input voltage of something like your ADC converter (-300mV in your case, which is typical), so you don't need to try to clamp the op-amp output/ADC input voltage near ground.



    On the other hand, it's probably more expensive than some other solutions that would take more engineering effort, so this is just one of many possibilities.






    share|improve this answer









    $endgroup$



    You can get a small negative voltage by using an LM7705 which produces -232mV nominal output voltage using a charge pump.



    enter image description here



    The advantage of using that part over a typical garden-variety inverting charge pump converter (eg. +5 to -5) or inverting boost converter is that the worst-case negative output voltage generally falls within the maximum negative input voltage of something like your ADC converter (-300mV in your case, which is typical), so you don't need to try to clamp the op-amp output/ADC input voltage near ground.



    On the other hand, it's probably more expensive than some other solutions that would take more engineering effort, so this is just one of many possibilities.







    share|improve this answer












    share|improve this answer



    share|improve this answer










    answered Mar 14 at 23:21









    Spehro PefhanySpehro Pefhany

    211k5162425




    211k5162425











    • $begingroup$
      How do I estimate the impact of the switching noise of the charge pump on the performance of the op-amp? Should I look at the op-amp's PSRR?
      $endgroup$
      – axk
      Mar 15 at 0:06










    • $begingroup$
      Output Voltage Ripple 4 mVpp 91kHz OPA365 60dB PSRR
      $endgroup$
      – Sunnyskyguy EE75
      Mar 15 at 0:56











    • $begingroup$
      Yes, Tony gave you the parameters. Of course you can filter it further if you need to.
      $endgroup$
      – Spehro Pefhany
      Mar 15 at 1:07






    • 1




      $begingroup$
      Package has external pins on 0.5mm centers, very easy to solder in many ways.
      $endgroup$
      – Sparky256
      Mar 15 at 1:16
















    • $begingroup$
      How do I estimate the impact of the switching noise of the charge pump on the performance of the op-amp? Should I look at the op-amp's PSRR?
      $endgroup$
      – axk
      Mar 15 at 0:06










    • $begingroup$
      Output Voltage Ripple 4 mVpp 91kHz OPA365 60dB PSRR
      $endgroup$
      – Sunnyskyguy EE75
      Mar 15 at 0:56











    • $begingroup$
      Yes, Tony gave you the parameters. Of course you can filter it further if you need to.
      $endgroup$
      – Spehro Pefhany
      Mar 15 at 1:07






    • 1




      $begingroup$
      Package has external pins on 0.5mm centers, very easy to solder in many ways.
      $endgroup$
      – Sparky256
      Mar 15 at 1:16















    $begingroup$
    How do I estimate the impact of the switching noise of the charge pump on the performance of the op-amp? Should I look at the op-amp's PSRR?
    $endgroup$
    – axk
    Mar 15 at 0:06




    $begingroup$
    How do I estimate the impact of the switching noise of the charge pump on the performance of the op-amp? Should I look at the op-amp's PSRR?
    $endgroup$
    – axk
    Mar 15 at 0:06












    $begingroup$
    Output Voltage Ripple 4 mVpp 91kHz OPA365 60dB PSRR
    $endgroup$
    – Sunnyskyguy EE75
    Mar 15 at 0:56





    $begingroup$
    Output Voltage Ripple 4 mVpp 91kHz OPA365 60dB PSRR
    $endgroup$
    – Sunnyskyguy EE75
    Mar 15 at 0:56













    $begingroup$
    Yes, Tony gave you the parameters. Of course you can filter it further if you need to.
    $endgroup$
    – Spehro Pefhany
    Mar 15 at 1:07




    $begingroup$
    Yes, Tony gave you the parameters. Of course you can filter it further if you need to.
    $endgroup$
    – Spehro Pefhany
    Mar 15 at 1:07




    1




    1




    $begingroup$
    Package has external pins on 0.5mm centers, very easy to solder in many ways.
    $endgroup$
    – Sparky256
    Mar 15 at 1:16




    $begingroup$
    Package has external pins on 0.5mm centers, very easy to solder in many ways.
    $endgroup$
    – Sparky256
    Mar 15 at 1:16













    4












    $begingroup$

    You could generate a small positive voltage, and use it as a virtual ground. Since you selected a differential ADC, its large common mode rejection can allow you to get away with a very simple way of generating that 0.2V reference voltage.





    schematic





    simulate this circuit – Schematic created using CircuitLab






    share|improve this answer









    $endgroup$

















      4












      $begingroup$

      You could generate a small positive voltage, and use it as a virtual ground. Since you selected a differential ADC, its large common mode rejection can allow you to get away with a very simple way of generating that 0.2V reference voltage.





      schematic





      simulate this circuit – Schematic created using CircuitLab






      share|improve this answer









      $endgroup$















        4












        4








        4





        $begingroup$

        You could generate a small positive voltage, and use it as a virtual ground. Since you selected a differential ADC, its large common mode rejection can allow you to get away with a very simple way of generating that 0.2V reference voltage.





        schematic





        simulate this circuit – Schematic created using CircuitLab






        share|improve this answer









        $endgroup$



        You could generate a small positive voltage, and use it as a virtual ground. Since you selected a differential ADC, its large common mode rejection can allow you to get away with a very simple way of generating that 0.2V reference voltage.





        schematic





        simulate this circuit – Schematic created using CircuitLab







        share|improve this answer












        share|improve this answer



        share|improve this answer










        answered Mar 14 at 23:32









        pserrapserra

        645313




        645313





















            -3












            $begingroup$

            Others have given some tips, but you need to be aware that what you're trying to do a very iffy deal. The problem is that, effectively, you're trying to do





            schematic





            simulate this circuit – Schematic created using CircuitLab



            The problem with this is that it's not accurate. You see those grounds? Trust me, at 20 amps, they are not all at the same voltage. For the current levels you're talking about, stray resistance will be a big problem. It will depend critically on pc layout and system wiring. For that matter, since copper has a rather large resistance tempco, you may have problems with temperature sensitivity due to your stray resistances changing. If you have any other part of the system which draws much current, the issue can become even worse.



            Assuming that you are using a very small sense resistor, with small voltages produced in order to avoid large power dissipation in your resistor, I would really recommend a differential measurement, also called a Kelvin connection.





            schematic





            simulate this circuit



            where your amplifier is an instrumentation or differential amplifier.



            Trust me on this, single-ended current measurement, other than very crude limit sensing, is a recipe for heartbreak. Trying to do it with a single-supply amplifier only makes it worse.






            share|improve this answer









            $endgroup$








            • 3




              $begingroup$
              -1 The problems you state are valid, but does not solve the question at all. He is already using a differential amplifier, and he wants to know how to measure close to GND which you solved by placing V2, but you skipped how that was implemented.
              $endgroup$
              – Linkyyy
              Mar 15 at 8:07






            • 1




              $begingroup$
              Unless I misread the question, the OP is talking about high-side current sense, your schematic is low-side.
              $endgroup$
              – Dmitry Grigoryev
              Mar 15 at 9:02










            • $begingroup$
              My understanding is that when I'm doing high-side current sensing the big current will go through the sense resistor only and I'm planning to use 5mR or 10mR 5W resistor or 2 of 10mR 5W in parallel and it rarely actually reaches the peak of 20A so I hope I should be fine. I estimate the consumption of the circuit with all digital stuff and a bluetooth transmitter should be no more than 70mA.
              $endgroup$
              – axk
              Mar 15 at 9:42
















            -3












            $begingroup$

            Others have given some tips, but you need to be aware that what you're trying to do a very iffy deal. The problem is that, effectively, you're trying to do





            schematic





            simulate this circuit – Schematic created using CircuitLab



            The problem with this is that it's not accurate. You see those grounds? Trust me, at 20 amps, they are not all at the same voltage. For the current levels you're talking about, stray resistance will be a big problem. It will depend critically on pc layout and system wiring. For that matter, since copper has a rather large resistance tempco, you may have problems with temperature sensitivity due to your stray resistances changing. If you have any other part of the system which draws much current, the issue can become even worse.



            Assuming that you are using a very small sense resistor, with small voltages produced in order to avoid large power dissipation in your resistor, I would really recommend a differential measurement, also called a Kelvin connection.





            schematic





            simulate this circuit



            where your amplifier is an instrumentation or differential amplifier.



            Trust me on this, single-ended current measurement, other than very crude limit sensing, is a recipe for heartbreak. Trying to do it with a single-supply amplifier only makes it worse.






            share|improve this answer









            $endgroup$








            • 3




              $begingroup$
              -1 The problems you state are valid, but does not solve the question at all. He is already using a differential amplifier, and he wants to know how to measure close to GND which you solved by placing V2, but you skipped how that was implemented.
              $endgroup$
              – Linkyyy
              Mar 15 at 8:07






            • 1




              $begingroup$
              Unless I misread the question, the OP is talking about high-side current sense, your schematic is low-side.
              $endgroup$
              – Dmitry Grigoryev
              Mar 15 at 9:02










            • $begingroup$
              My understanding is that when I'm doing high-side current sensing the big current will go through the sense resistor only and I'm planning to use 5mR or 10mR 5W resistor or 2 of 10mR 5W in parallel and it rarely actually reaches the peak of 20A so I hope I should be fine. I estimate the consumption of the circuit with all digital stuff and a bluetooth transmitter should be no more than 70mA.
              $endgroup$
              – axk
              Mar 15 at 9:42














            -3












            -3








            -3





            $begingroup$

            Others have given some tips, but you need to be aware that what you're trying to do a very iffy deal. The problem is that, effectively, you're trying to do





            schematic





            simulate this circuit – Schematic created using CircuitLab



            The problem with this is that it's not accurate. You see those grounds? Trust me, at 20 amps, they are not all at the same voltage. For the current levels you're talking about, stray resistance will be a big problem. It will depend critically on pc layout and system wiring. For that matter, since copper has a rather large resistance tempco, you may have problems with temperature sensitivity due to your stray resistances changing. If you have any other part of the system which draws much current, the issue can become even worse.



            Assuming that you are using a very small sense resistor, with small voltages produced in order to avoid large power dissipation in your resistor, I would really recommend a differential measurement, also called a Kelvin connection.





            schematic





            simulate this circuit



            where your amplifier is an instrumentation or differential amplifier.



            Trust me on this, single-ended current measurement, other than very crude limit sensing, is a recipe for heartbreak. Trying to do it with a single-supply amplifier only makes it worse.






            share|improve this answer









            $endgroup$



            Others have given some tips, but you need to be aware that what you're trying to do a very iffy deal. The problem is that, effectively, you're trying to do





            schematic





            simulate this circuit – Schematic created using CircuitLab



            The problem with this is that it's not accurate. You see those grounds? Trust me, at 20 amps, they are not all at the same voltage. For the current levels you're talking about, stray resistance will be a big problem. It will depend critically on pc layout and system wiring. For that matter, since copper has a rather large resistance tempco, you may have problems with temperature sensitivity due to your stray resistances changing. If you have any other part of the system which draws much current, the issue can become even worse.



            Assuming that you are using a very small sense resistor, with small voltages produced in order to avoid large power dissipation in your resistor, I would really recommend a differential measurement, also called a Kelvin connection.





            schematic





            simulate this circuit



            where your amplifier is an instrumentation or differential amplifier.



            Trust me on this, single-ended current measurement, other than very crude limit sensing, is a recipe for heartbreak. Trying to do it with a single-supply amplifier only makes it worse.







            share|improve this answer












            share|improve this answer



            share|improve this answer










            answered Mar 15 at 1:58









            WhatRoughBeastWhatRoughBeast

            50.1k22876




            50.1k22876







            • 3




              $begingroup$
              -1 The problems you state are valid, but does not solve the question at all. He is already using a differential amplifier, and he wants to know how to measure close to GND which you solved by placing V2, but you skipped how that was implemented.
              $endgroup$
              – Linkyyy
              Mar 15 at 8:07






            • 1




              $begingroup$
              Unless I misread the question, the OP is talking about high-side current sense, your schematic is low-side.
              $endgroup$
              – Dmitry Grigoryev
              Mar 15 at 9:02










            • $begingroup$
              My understanding is that when I'm doing high-side current sensing the big current will go through the sense resistor only and I'm planning to use 5mR or 10mR 5W resistor or 2 of 10mR 5W in parallel and it rarely actually reaches the peak of 20A so I hope I should be fine. I estimate the consumption of the circuit with all digital stuff and a bluetooth transmitter should be no more than 70mA.
              $endgroup$
              – axk
              Mar 15 at 9:42













            • 3




              $begingroup$
              -1 The problems you state are valid, but does not solve the question at all. He is already using a differential amplifier, and he wants to know how to measure close to GND which you solved by placing V2, but you skipped how that was implemented.
              $endgroup$
              – Linkyyy
              Mar 15 at 8:07






            • 1




              $begingroup$
              Unless I misread the question, the OP is talking about high-side current sense, your schematic is low-side.
              $endgroup$
              – Dmitry Grigoryev
              Mar 15 at 9:02










            • $begingroup$
              My understanding is that when I'm doing high-side current sensing the big current will go through the sense resistor only and I'm planning to use 5mR or 10mR 5W resistor or 2 of 10mR 5W in parallel and it rarely actually reaches the peak of 20A so I hope I should be fine. I estimate the consumption of the circuit with all digital stuff and a bluetooth transmitter should be no more than 70mA.
              $endgroup$
              – axk
              Mar 15 at 9:42








            3




            3




            $begingroup$
            -1 The problems you state are valid, but does not solve the question at all. He is already using a differential amplifier, and he wants to know how to measure close to GND which you solved by placing V2, but you skipped how that was implemented.
            $endgroup$
            – Linkyyy
            Mar 15 at 8:07




            $begingroup$
            -1 The problems you state are valid, but does not solve the question at all. He is already using a differential amplifier, and he wants to know how to measure close to GND which you solved by placing V2, but you skipped how that was implemented.
            $endgroup$
            – Linkyyy
            Mar 15 at 8:07




            1




            1




            $begingroup$
            Unless I misread the question, the OP is talking about high-side current sense, your schematic is low-side.
            $endgroup$
            – Dmitry Grigoryev
            Mar 15 at 9:02




            $begingroup$
            Unless I misread the question, the OP is talking about high-side current sense, your schematic is low-side.
            $endgroup$
            – Dmitry Grigoryev
            Mar 15 at 9:02












            $begingroup$
            My understanding is that when I'm doing high-side current sensing the big current will go through the sense resistor only and I'm planning to use 5mR or 10mR 5W resistor or 2 of 10mR 5W in parallel and it rarely actually reaches the peak of 20A so I hope I should be fine. I estimate the consumption of the circuit with all digital stuff and a bluetooth transmitter should be no more than 70mA.
            $endgroup$
            – axk
            Mar 15 at 9:42





            $begingroup$
            My understanding is that when I'm doing high-side current sensing the big current will go through the sense resistor only and I'm planning to use 5mR or 10mR 5W resistor or 2 of 10mR 5W in parallel and it rarely actually reaches the peak of 20A so I hope I should be fine. I estimate the consumption of the circuit with all digital stuff and a bluetooth transmitter should be no more than 70mA.
            $endgroup$
            – axk
            Mar 15 at 9:42


















            draft saved

            draft discarded
















































            Thanks for contributing an answer to Electrical Engineering Stack Exchange!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid


            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

            Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function ()
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2felectronics.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f427315%2fcurrent-sense-amplifier-op-amp-buffer-adc-measuring-down-to-0-with-a-single%23new-answer', 'question_page');

            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            Popular posts from this blog

            How should I support this large drywall patch? Planned maintenance scheduled April 23, 2019 at 00:00UTC (8:00pm US/Eastern) Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara Unicorn Meta Zoo #1: Why another podcast?How do I cover large gaps in drywall?How do I keep drywall around a patch from crumbling?Can I glue a second layer of drywall?How to patch long strip on drywall?Large drywall patch: how to avoid bulging seams?Drywall Mesh Patch vs. Bulge? To remove or not to remove?How to fix this drywall job?Prep drywall before backsplashWhat's the best way to fix this horrible drywall patch job?Drywall patching using 3M Patch Plus Primer

            random experiment with two different functions on unit interval Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara Planned maintenance scheduled April 23, 2019 at 00:00UTC (8:00pm US/Eastern)Random variable and probability space notionsRandom Walk with EdgesFinding functions where the increase over a random interval is Poisson distributedNumber of days until dayCan an observed event in fact be of zero probability?Unit random processmodels of coins and uniform distributionHow to get the number of successes given $n$ trials , probability $P$ and a random variable $X$Absorbing Markov chain in a computer. Is “almost every” turned into always convergence in computer executions?Stopped random walk is not uniformly integrable

            Lowndes Grove History Architecture References Navigation menu32°48′6″N 79°57′58″W / 32.80167°N 79.96611°W / 32.80167; -79.9661132°48′6″N 79°57′58″W / 32.80167°N 79.96611°W / 32.80167; -79.9661178002500"National Register Information System"Historic houses of South Carolina"Lowndes Grove""+32° 48' 6.00", −79° 57' 58.00""Lowndes Grove, Charleston County (260 St. Margaret St., Charleston)""Lowndes Grove"The Charleston ExpositionIt Happened in South Carolina"Lowndes Grove (House), Saint Margaret Street & Sixth Avenue, Charleston, Charleston County, SC(Photographs)"Plantations of the Carolina Low Countrye