Isothermal parameterization, Inverse of the Gauss Map Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara Planned maintenance scheduled April 17/18, 2019 at 00:00UTC (8:00pm US/Eastern)Deriving equations for the “Bianchi-Pinkall torus”Question about focal surfaceThe Weierstrass-Enneper representation, the Gauss mapGeneric fibers of the Gauss map are linear spacesJacobian of parametric surface $s(u,v)$ w.r.t. basis in $R^3$.Parameterising the intersection of a plane and paraboloidConfusion about partial derivative of a vector field.Why is the inverse of a parameterization of a regular surface differentiable?Geometric significance of the differential of the Gauss map, $dN_p: T_p(S) rightarrow T_p(S)$, being a self adjoint linear map.Define a parameterization given a vector field on a smooth manifold
Is "Reachable Object" really an NP-complete problem?
Most bit efficient text communication method?
Is it common practice to audition new musicians 1-2-1 before rehearsing with the entire band?
Can anything be seen from the center of the Boötes void? How dark would it be?
Fantasy story; one type of magic grows in power with use, but the more powerful they are, they more they are drawn to travel to their source
Can melee weapons be used to deliver Contact Poisons?
How do I stop a creek from eroding my steep embankment?
Do wooden building fires get hotter than 600°C?
What causes the direction of lightning flashes?
Denied boarding although I have proper visa and documentation. To whom should I make a complaint?
How to tell that you are a giant?
Extracting terms with certain heads in a function
When the Haste spell ends on a creature, do attackers have advantage against that creature?
Closed form of recurrent arithmetic series summation
What is homebrew?
Around usage results
Compare a given version number in the form major.minor.build.patch and see if one is less than the other
Is there such thing as an Availability Group failover trigger?
Significance of Cersei's obsession with elephants?
What would be the ideal power source for a cybernetic eye?
What are the out-of-universe reasons for the references to Toby Maguire-era Spider-Man in ITSV
Find the length x such that the two distances in the triangle are the same
How do pianists reach extremely loud dynamics?
First console to have temporary backward compatibility
Isothermal parameterization, Inverse of the Gauss Map
Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara
Planned maintenance scheduled April 17/18, 2019 at 00:00UTC (8:00pm US/Eastern)Deriving equations for the “Bianchi-Pinkall torus”Question about focal surfaceThe Weierstrass-Enneper representation, the Gauss mapGeneric fibers of the Gauss map are linear spacesJacobian of parametric surface $s(u,v)$ w.r.t. basis in $R^3$.Parameterising the intersection of a plane and paraboloidConfusion about partial derivative of a vector field.Why is the inverse of a parameterization of a regular surface differentiable?Geometric significance of the differential of the Gauss map, $dN_p: T_p(S) rightarrow T_p(S)$, being a self adjoint linear map.Define a parameterization given a vector field on a smooth manifold
$begingroup$
This problem is from Do Carmo's Differential Geometry of Curves and Surfaces. It is question 13 from chapter 3.5, to be specific.
Suppose that S is a minimal surface without any umbilical points (that is to say that $k_1 = -k_2$ everywhere). Let $barx$ be a parameterization of the unit sphere by stereograhic projection, and consider a neighborhood $V$ of a point $p$ on the surface so that the Gauss map $N: S rightarrow S^2$ restricted to the neighborhood $V$ is a diffeomorphism.
The question is to show that the parameterization $q= N^-1$ o $bar x$ is isothermal, meaning that $<q_u, q_u > = <q_v, q_v>$ and $<q_u,q_v> = 0$ everywhere on $S$.
Now when I saw this question, my first instinct was to try to verify that $q$ was isothermal directly by computing the parameterization in some kind of coordinates directly. I know that stereographic projection is given by the formulas:
$$ x= frac 4uu^2+v^2+4$$
$$ y = frac 4vu^2+v^2+4$$
$$ z = frac 2(u^2+v^2)u^2+v^2+4 $$
I figured with this information, maybe I could find a way to write down what $q$ is in terms of $u$ and $v$ and take partials. The problem is that I don't know how to write down anything about $N^-1$. Like when working with $N$, I can say that a point on a surface $S$ goes to it's normal, which is something that I can compute in terms of cross products of partial derivatives of a parameterization of the surface.
Is this method workable? I don't know if I can proceed any further this way. If not, what can I do to approach this problem?
multivariable-calculus differential-geometry surfaces minimal-surfaces
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
This problem is from Do Carmo's Differential Geometry of Curves and Surfaces. It is question 13 from chapter 3.5, to be specific.
Suppose that S is a minimal surface without any umbilical points (that is to say that $k_1 = -k_2$ everywhere). Let $barx$ be a parameterization of the unit sphere by stereograhic projection, and consider a neighborhood $V$ of a point $p$ on the surface so that the Gauss map $N: S rightarrow S^2$ restricted to the neighborhood $V$ is a diffeomorphism.
The question is to show that the parameterization $q= N^-1$ o $bar x$ is isothermal, meaning that $<q_u, q_u > = <q_v, q_v>$ and $<q_u,q_v> = 0$ everywhere on $S$.
Now when I saw this question, my first instinct was to try to verify that $q$ was isothermal directly by computing the parameterization in some kind of coordinates directly. I know that stereographic projection is given by the formulas:
$$ x= frac 4uu^2+v^2+4$$
$$ y = frac 4vu^2+v^2+4$$
$$ z = frac 2(u^2+v^2)u^2+v^2+4 $$
I figured with this information, maybe I could find a way to write down what $q$ is in terms of $u$ and $v$ and take partials. The problem is that I don't know how to write down anything about $N^-1$. Like when working with $N$, I can say that a point on a surface $S$ goes to it's normal, which is something that I can compute in terms of cross products of partial derivatives of a parameterization of the surface.
Is this method workable? I don't know if I can proceed any further this way. If not, what can I do to approach this problem?
multivariable-calculus differential-geometry surfaces minimal-surfaces
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
This problem is from Do Carmo's Differential Geometry of Curves and Surfaces. It is question 13 from chapter 3.5, to be specific.
Suppose that S is a minimal surface without any umbilical points (that is to say that $k_1 = -k_2$ everywhere). Let $barx$ be a parameterization of the unit sphere by stereograhic projection, and consider a neighborhood $V$ of a point $p$ on the surface so that the Gauss map $N: S rightarrow S^2$ restricted to the neighborhood $V$ is a diffeomorphism.
The question is to show that the parameterization $q= N^-1$ o $bar x$ is isothermal, meaning that $<q_u, q_u > = <q_v, q_v>$ and $<q_u,q_v> = 0$ everywhere on $S$.
Now when I saw this question, my first instinct was to try to verify that $q$ was isothermal directly by computing the parameterization in some kind of coordinates directly. I know that stereographic projection is given by the formulas:
$$ x= frac 4uu^2+v^2+4$$
$$ y = frac 4vu^2+v^2+4$$
$$ z = frac 2(u^2+v^2)u^2+v^2+4 $$
I figured with this information, maybe I could find a way to write down what $q$ is in terms of $u$ and $v$ and take partials. The problem is that I don't know how to write down anything about $N^-1$. Like when working with $N$, I can say that a point on a surface $S$ goes to it's normal, which is something that I can compute in terms of cross products of partial derivatives of a parameterization of the surface.
Is this method workable? I don't know if I can proceed any further this way. If not, what can I do to approach this problem?
multivariable-calculus differential-geometry surfaces minimal-surfaces
$endgroup$
This problem is from Do Carmo's Differential Geometry of Curves and Surfaces. It is question 13 from chapter 3.5, to be specific.
Suppose that S is a minimal surface without any umbilical points (that is to say that $k_1 = -k_2$ everywhere). Let $barx$ be a parameterization of the unit sphere by stereograhic projection, and consider a neighborhood $V$ of a point $p$ on the surface so that the Gauss map $N: S rightarrow S^2$ restricted to the neighborhood $V$ is a diffeomorphism.
The question is to show that the parameterization $q= N^-1$ o $bar x$ is isothermal, meaning that $<q_u, q_u > = <q_v, q_v>$ and $<q_u,q_v> = 0$ everywhere on $S$.
Now when I saw this question, my first instinct was to try to verify that $q$ was isothermal directly by computing the parameterization in some kind of coordinates directly. I know that stereographic projection is given by the formulas:
$$ x= frac 4uu^2+v^2+4$$
$$ y = frac 4vu^2+v^2+4$$
$$ z = frac 2(u^2+v^2)u^2+v^2+4 $$
I figured with this information, maybe I could find a way to write down what $q$ is in terms of $u$ and $v$ and take partials. The problem is that I don't know how to write down anything about $N^-1$. Like when working with $N$, I can say that a point on a surface $S$ goes to it's normal, which is something that I can compute in terms of cross products of partial derivatives of a parameterization of the surface.
Is this method workable? I don't know if I can proceed any further this way. If not, what can I do to approach this problem?
multivariable-calculus differential-geometry surfaces minimal-surfaces
multivariable-calculus differential-geometry surfaces minimal-surfaces
edited Mar 14 '15 at 20:34
Alfred Yerger
asked Mar 12 '15 at 3:06
Alfred YergerAlfred Yerger
10.7k2249
10.7k2249
add a comment |
add a comment |
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
The formulas of the stereographic projection give $langle barx_u,barx_urangle = langle barx_v,barx_vrangle$ and $langle barx_u,barx_vrangle = 0$, and the first part of this exercise says $langle mathrmdN(q_u),mathrmdN(q_u)rangle = lambda_p langle q_u,q_urangle$, hence $$beginalign*
langle q_u,q_urangle &= lambda_p^-1langle mathrmdN(q_u),mathrmdN(q_u)rangle \
&= lambda_p^-1 langle (Ncirc q)_u,(Ncirc q)_urangle\
&= lambda_p^-1 langle barx_u,barx_urangle \
&= lambda_p^-1 langle barx_v,barx_vrangle \
&= langle q_v,q_vrangle
endalign*$$
Similarly $$beginalign*
langle q_u,q_vrangle &= lambda_p^-1langle mathrmdN(q_u),mathrmdN(q_v)rangle \
&= lambda_p^-1 langle (Ncirc q)_u,(Ncirc q)_vrangle\
&= lambda_p^-1 langle barx_u,barx_vrangle \
&= 0
endalign*$$
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Stereographic projection is conformal and you can also show the Gauss map is conformal for a minimal surface.
This is not very hard; simply assume $langle dN_p(t_1),dN_p(t_2)rangle=lambda(p)langle t_1,t_2rangle forall t_1,t_2 in T_pS$ and then take the basis of $T_pS$ consisting of the principal directions of the gauss map. A quick bit of algebra will show that the principal curvatures satisfy $k_1=-k_2$.
Hence the parameterisation you mention is a conformal mapping from the plane, hence isothermal.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);
else
createEditor();
);
function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);
);
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f1186271%2fisothermal-parameterization-inverse-of-the-gauss-map%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
The formulas of the stereographic projection give $langle barx_u,barx_urangle = langle barx_v,barx_vrangle$ and $langle barx_u,barx_vrangle = 0$, and the first part of this exercise says $langle mathrmdN(q_u),mathrmdN(q_u)rangle = lambda_p langle q_u,q_urangle$, hence $$beginalign*
langle q_u,q_urangle &= lambda_p^-1langle mathrmdN(q_u),mathrmdN(q_u)rangle \
&= lambda_p^-1 langle (Ncirc q)_u,(Ncirc q)_urangle\
&= lambda_p^-1 langle barx_u,barx_urangle \
&= lambda_p^-1 langle barx_v,barx_vrangle \
&= langle q_v,q_vrangle
endalign*$$
Similarly $$beginalign*
langle q_u,q_vrangle &= lambda_p^-1langle mathrmdN(q_u),mathrmdN(q_v)rangle \
&= lambda_p^-1 langle (Ncirc q)_u,(Ncirc q)_vrangle\
&= lambda_p^-1 langle barx_u,barx_vrangle \
&= 0
endalign*$$
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
The formulas of the stereographic projection give $langle barx_u,barx_urangle = langle barx_v,barx_vrangle$ and $langle barx_u,barx_vrangle = 0$, and the first part of this exercise says $langle mathrmdN(q_u),mathrmdN(q_u)rangle = lambda_p langle q_u,q_urangle$, hence $$beginalign*
langle q_u,q_urangle &= lambda_p^-1langle mathrmdN(q_u),mathrmdN(q_u)rangle \
&= lambda_p^-1 langle (Ncirc q)_u,(Ncirc q)_urangle\
&= lambda_p^-1 langle barx_u,barx_urangle \
&= lambda_p^-1 langle barx_v,barx_vrangle \
&= langle q_v,q_vrangle
endalign*$$
Similarly $$beginalign*
langle q_u,q_vrangle &= lambda_p^-1langle mathrmdN(q_u),mathrmdN(q_v)rangle \
&= lambda_p^-1 langle (Ncirc q)_u,(Ncirc q)_vrangle\
&= lambda_p^-1 langle barx_u,barx_vrangle \
&= 0
endalign*$$
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
The formulas of the stereographic projection give $langle barx_u,barx_urangle = langle barx_v,barx_vrangle$ and $langle barx_u,barx_vrangle = 0$, and the first part of this exercise says $langle mathrmdN(q_u),mathrmdN(q_u)rangle = lambda_p langle q_u,q_urangle$, hence $$beginalign*
langle q_u,q_urangle &= lambda_p^-1langle mathrmdN(q_u),mathrmdN(q_u)rangle \
&= lambda_p^-1 langle (Ncirc q)_u,(Ncirc q)_urangle\
&= lambda_p^-1 langle barx_u,barx_urangle \
&= lambda_p^-1 langle barx_v,barx_vrangle \
&= langle q_v,q_vrangle
endalign*$$
Similarly $$beginalign*
langle q_u,q_vrangle &= lambda_p^-1langle mathrmdN(q_u),mathrmdN(q_v)rangle \
&= lambda_p^-1 langle (Ncirc q)_u,(Ncirc q)_vrangle\
&= lambda_p^-1 langle barx_u,barx_vrangle \
&= 0
endalign*$$
$endgroup$
The formulas of the stereographic projection give $langle barx_u,barx_urangle = langle barx_v,barx_vrangle$ and $langle barx_u,barx_vrangle = 0$, and the first part of this exercise says $langle mathrmdN(q_u),mathrmdN(q_u)rangle = lambda_p langle q_u,q_urangle$, hence $$beginalign*
langle q_u,q_urangle &= lambda_p^-1langle mathrmdN(q_u),mathrmdN(q_u)rangle \
&= lambda_p^-1 langle (Ncirc q)_u,(Ncirc q)_urangle\
&= lambda_p^-1 langle barx_u,barx_urangle \
&= lambda_p^-1 langle barx_v,barx_vrangle \
&= langle q_v,q_vrangle
endalign*$$
Similarly $$beginalign*
langle q_u,q_vrangle &= lambda_p^-1langle mathrmdN(q_u),mathrmdN(q_v)rangle \
&= lambda_p^-1 langle (Ncirc q)_u,(Ncirc q)_vrangle\
&= lambda_p^-1 langle barx_u,barx_vrangle \
&= 0
endalign*$$
answered Nov 10 '17 at 9:08
J. XUJ. XU
431214
431214
add a comment |
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Stereographic projection is conformal and you can also show the Gauss map is conformal for a minimal surface.
This is not very hard; simply assume $langle dN_p(t_1),dN_p(t_2)rangle=lambda(p)langle t_1,t_2rangle forall t_1,t_2 in T_pS$ and then take the basis of $T_pS$ consisting of the principal directions of the gauss map. A quick bit of algebra will show that the principal curvatures satisfy $k_1=-k_2$.
Hence the parameterisation you mention is a conformal mapping from the plane, hence isothermal.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Stereographic projection is conformal and you can also show the Gauss map is conformal for a minimal surface.
This is not very hard; simply assume $langle dN_p(t_1),dN_p(t_2)rangle=lambda(p)langle t_1,t_2rangle forall t_1,t_2 in T_pS$ and then take the basis of $T_pS$ consisting of the principal directions of the gauss map. A quick bit of algebra will show that the principal curvatures satisfy $k_1=-k_2$.
Hence the parameterisation you mention is a conformal mapping from the plane, hence isothermal.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Stereographic projection is conformal and you can also show the Gauss map is conformal for a minimal surface.
This is not very hard; simply assume $langle dN_p(t_1),dN_p(t_2)rangle=lambda(p)langle t_1,t_2rangle forall t_1,t_2 in T_pS$ and then take the basis of $T_pS$ consisting of the principal directions of the gauss map. A quick bit of algebra will show that the principal curvatures satisfy $k_1=-k_2$.
Hence the parameterisation you mention is a conformal mapping from the plane, hence isothermal.
$endgroup$
Stereographic projection is conformal and you can also show the Gauss map is conformal for a minimal surface.
This is not very hard; simply assume $langle dN_p(t_1),dN_p(t_2)rangle=lambda(p)langle t_1,t_2rangle forall t_1,t_2 in T_pS$ and then take the basis of $T_pS$ consisting of the principal directions of the gauss map. A quick bit of algebra will show that the principal curvatures satisfy $k_1=-k_2$.
Hence the parameterisation you mention is a conformal mapping from the plane, hence isothermal.
edited Mar 27 at 0:40
J. M. is a poor mathematician
61.3k5152291
61.3k5152291
answered May 24 '16 at 12:09
ShakespeareShakespeare
2,509923
2,509923
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f1186271%2fisothermal-parameterization-inverse-of-the-gauss-map%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown