Show that the direct sum of a kernel of a projection and its image create the originating vector space. Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara Planned maintenance scheduled April 17/18, 2019 at 00:00UTC (8:00pm US/Eastern)Let $T: V rightarrow W $ be a linear mapping such that $T^2=T$, show that $V = M oplus N$.Vector space as direct sum of kernel and imageKernel and Image of linear transformation are supplementaryDirect product of the kernel and image of a linear transformationlinear map between vector spaces/ Direct sum/ Kernel and imageFinding the kernel and image of a linear transformation over the field $Bbb Z_2$Central idempotent vector space endomorphismsProblem related to linear transformation and its image and kernelKernel and Image of an orthogonal projectionHow do I show that is is orthogonal to every vector in the plane?Diagonalisable iff kernel and image forms direct sumWhat can be said about linear maps where range and kernel are in direct sum?Calculate the dimensions and basis of the kernel and image (derivated function with matrix)Proving equalities on the kernel and image of a linear transformationFinding bases for Ker(T) and Rng(T)

For a new assistant professor in CS, how to build/manage a publication pipeline

Can an alien society believe that their star system is the universe?

Around usage results

Trademark violation for app?

Delete nth line from bottom

What do you call the main part of a joke?

If my PI received research grants from a company to be able to pay my postdoc salary, did I have a potential conflict interest too?

Is it cost-effective to upgrade an old-ish Giant Escape R3 commuter bike with entry-level branded parts (wheels, drivetrain)?

Why are the trig functions versine, haversine, exsecant, etc, rarely used in modern mathematics?

Can a party unilaterally change candidates in preparation for a General election?

Dating a Former Employee

Is there such thing as an Availability Group failover trigger?

How do pianists reach extremely loud dynamics?

If a contract sometimes uses the wrong name, is it still valid?

How to tell that you are a giant?

2001: A Space Odyssey's use of the song "Daisy Bell" (Bicycle Built for Two); life imitates art or vice-versa?

Using et al. for a last / senior author rather than for a first author

What does "lightly crushed" mean for cardamon pods?

When a candle burns, why does the top of wick glow if bottom of flame is hottest?

How to compare two different files line by line in unix?

Is safe to use va_start macro with this as parameter?

Can anything be seen from the center of the Boötes void? How dark would it be?

When the Haste spell ends on a creature, do attackers have advantage against that creature?

Did MS DOS itself ever use blinking text?



Show that the direct sum of a kernel of a projection and its image create the originating vector space.



Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara
Planned maintenance scheduled April 17/18, 2019 at 00:00UTC (8:00pm US/Eastern)Let $T: V rightarrow W $ be a linear mapping such that $T^2=T$, show that $V = M oplus N$.Vector space as direct sum of kernel and imageKernel and Image of linear transformation are supplementaryDirect product of the kernel and image of a linear transformationlinear map between vector spaces/ Direct sum/ Kernel and imageFinding the kernel and image of a linear transformation over the field $Bbb Z_2$Central idempotent vector space endomorphismsProblem related to linear transformation and its image and kernelKernel and Image of an orthogonal projectionHow do I show that is is orthogonal to every vector in the plane?Diagonalisable iff kernel and image forms direct sumWhat can be said about linear maps where range and kernel are in direct sum?Calculate the dimensions and basis of the kernel and image (derivated function with matrix)Proving equalities on the kernel and image of a linear transformationFinding bases for Ker(T) and Rng(T)










18












$begingroup$


I got the following question as my homework.




Given $V$ is a vector space with $P in operatornameEnd V$. $P circ P = P$ ("P is idempotent"). Show that $V = operatornameKer P oplus operatornameIm P$.




One $P$ I can imagine is a projection from 3d-space to plane, that just sets some coordinates to zero. For example $beginpmatrix x \ y \ zendpmatrix mapsto beginpmatrixx \ y \ 0endpmatrix$. Then $operatornameKer P$ would give the line $beginpmatrix 0 \ 0 \ zendpmatrix$ and $operatornameIm P$ would contain all $beginpmatrixx \ y \ 0endpmatrix$. So the result of $operatornameKer P oplus operatornameIm P$ is of course $V$.



But how do I prove that in a mathematical way?










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$











  • $begingroup$
    very light hint: think about the transformation $1 - P$. What happens when you square it? What happens when you multiply it by $P$? What happens when you add $P$?
    $endgroup$
    – user29743
    Dec 18 '12 at 21:16










  • $begingroup$
    (by 1 i mean the identity)
    $endgroup$
    – user29743
    Dec 18 '12 at 21:17










  • $begingroup$
    $1 - P$ seems to give $operatornameker P$, $1 - P circ 1 - P = 1 - P$. And when I add $P$ to $1 - P$, I get $1$, but how does that help me?
    $endgroup$
    – iblue
    Dec 18 '12 at 21:22










  • $begingroup$
    sorry I know it is off-topic, but am i the only person for which mathjax does not render latex on stackexchange ?
    $endgroup$
    – nicolas
    Mar 1 '14 at 13:48










  • $begingroup$
    @nicolas: you should post on meta describing your problem. This is not the place for this kind of question.
    $endgroup$
    – robjohn
    Mar 2 '14 at 4:44















18












$begingroup$


I got the following question as my homework.




Given $V$ is a vector space with $P in operatornameEnd V$. $P circ P = P$ ("P is idempotent"). Show that $V = operatornameKer P oplus operatornameIm P$.




One $P$ I can imagine is a projection from 3d-space to plane, that just sets some coordinates to zero. For example $beginpmatrix x \ y \ zendpmatrix mapsto beginpmatrixx \ y \ 0endpmatrix$. Then $operatornameKer P$ would give the line $beginpmatrix 0 \ 0 \ zendpmatrix$ and $operatornameIm P$ would contain all $beginpmatrixx \ y \ 0endpmatrix$. So the result of $operatornameKer P oplus operatornameIm P$ is of course $V$.



But how do I prove that in a mathematical way?










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$











  • $begingroup$
    very light hint: think about the transformation $1 - P$. What happens when you square it? What happens when you multiply it by $P$? What happens when you add $P$?
    $endgroup$
    – user29743
    Dec 18 '12 at 21:16










  • $begingroup$
    (by 1 i mean the identity)
    $endgroup$
    – user29743
    Dec 18 '12 at 21:17










  • $begingroup$
    $1 - P$ seems to give $operatornameker P$, $1 - P circ 1 - P = 1 - P$. And when I add $P$ to $1 - P$, I get $1$, but how does that help me?
    $endgroup$
    – iblue
    Dec 18 '12 at 21:22










  • $begingroup$
    sorry I know it is off-topic, but am i the only person for which mathjax does not render latex on stackexchange ?
    $endgroup$
    – nicolas
    Mar 1 '14 at 13:48










  • $begingroup$
    @nicolas: you should post on meta describing your problem. This is not the place for this kind of question.
    $endgroup$
    – robjohn
    Mar 2 '14 at 4:44













18












18








18


7



$begingroup$


I got the following question as my homework.




Given $V$ is a vector space with $P in operatornameEnd V$. $P circ P = P$ ("P is idempotent"). Show that $V = operatornameKer P oplus operatornameIm P$.




One $P$ I can imagine is a projection from 3d-space to plane, that just sets some coordinates to zero. For example $beginpmatrix x \ y \ zendpmatrix mapsto beginpmatrixx \ y \ 0endpmatrix$. Then $operatornameKer P$ would give the line $beginpmatrix 0 \ 0 \ zendpmatrix$ and $operatornameIm P$ would contain all $beginpmatrixx \ y \ 0endpmatrix$. So the result of $operatornameKer P oplus operatornameIm P$ is of course $V$.



But how do I prove that in a mathematical way?










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$




I got the following question as my homework.




Given $V$ is a vector space with $P in operatornameEnd V$. $P circ P = P$ ("P is idempotent"). Show that $V = operatornameKer P oplus operatornameIm P$.




One $P$ I can imagine is a projection from 3d-space to plane, that just sets some coordinates to zero. For example $beginpmatrix x \ y \ zendpmatrix mapsto beginpmatrixx \ y \ 0endpmatrix$. Then $operatornameKer P$ would give the line $beginpmatrix 0 \ 0 \ zendpmatrix$ and $operatornameIm P$ would contain all $beginpmatrixx \ y \ 0endpmatrix$. So the result of $operatornameKer P oplus operatornameIm P$ is of course $V$.



But how do I prove that in a mathematical way?







linear-algebra






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited Dec 18 '12 at 22:15









Tom Oldfield

9,56812058




9,56812058










asked Dec 18 '12 at 21:12









iblueiblue

6271721




6271721











  • $begingroup$
    very light hint: think about the transformation $1 - P$. What happens when you square it? What happens when you multiply it by $P$? What happens when you add $P$?
    $endgroup$
    – user29743
    Dec 18 '12 at 21:16










  • $begingroup$
    (by 1 i mean the identity)
    $endgroup$
    – user29743
    Dec 18 '12 at 21:17










  • $begingroup$
    $1 - P$ seems to give $operatornameker P$, $1 - P circ 1 - P = 1 - P$. And when I add $P$ to $1 - P$, I get $1$, but how does that help me?
    $endgroup$
    – iblue
    Dec 18 '12 at 21:22










  • $begingroup$
    sorry I know it is off-topic, but am i the only person for which mathjax does not render latex on stackexchange ?
    $endgroup$
    – nicolas
    Mar 1 '14 at 13:48










  • $begingroup$
    @nicolas: you should post on meta describing your problem. This is not the place for this kind of question.
    $endgroup$
    – robjohn
    Mar 2 '14 at 4:44
















  • $begingroup$
    very light hint: think about the transformation $1 - P$. What happens when you square it? What happens when you multiply it by $P$? What happens when you add $P$?
    $endgroup$
    – user29743
    Dec 18 '12 at 21:16










  • $begingroup$
    (by 1 i mean the identity)
    $endgroup$
    – user29743
    Dec 18 '12 at 21:17










  • $begingroup$
    $1 - P$ seems to give $operatornameker P$, $1 - P circ 1 - P = 1 - P$. And when I add $P$ to $1 - P$, I get $1$, but how does that help me?
    $endgroup$
    – iblue
    Dec 18 '12 at 21:22










  • $begingroup$
    sorry I know it is off-topic, but am i the only person for which mathjax does not render latex on stackexchange ?
    $endgroup$
    – nicolas
    Mar 1 '14 at 13:48










  • $begingroup$
    @nicolas: you should post on meta describing your problem. This is not the place for this kind of question.
    $endgroup$
    – robjohn
    Mar 2 '14 at 4:44















$begingroup$
very light hint: think about the transformation $1 - P$. What happens when you square it? What happens when you multiply it by $P$? What happens when you add $P$?
$endgroup$
– user29743
Dec 18 '12 at 21:16




$begingroup$
very light hint: think about the transformation $1 - P$. What happens when you square it? What happens when you multiply it by $P$? What happens when you add $P$?
$endgroup$
– user29743
Dec 18 '12 at 21:16












$begingroup$
(by 1 i mean the identity)
$endgroup$
– user29743
Dec 18 '12 at 21:17




$begingroup$
(by 1 i mean the identity)
$endgroup$
– user29743
Dec 18 '12 at 21:17












$begingroup$
$1 - P$ seems to give $operatornameker P$, $1 - P circ 1 - P = 1 - P$. And when I add $P$ to $1 - P$, I get $1$, but how does that help me?
$endgroup$
– iblue
Dec 18 '12 at 21:22




$begingroup$
$1 - P$ seems to give $operatornameker P$, $1 - P circ 1 - P = 1 - P$. And when I add $P$ to $1 - P$, I get $1$, but how does that help me?
$endgroup$
– iblue
Dec 18 '12 at 21:22












$begingroup$
sorry I know it is off-topic, but am i the only person for which mathjax does not render latex on stackexchange ?
$endgroup$
– nicolas
Mar 1 '14 at 13:48




$begingroup$
sorry I know it is off-topic, but am i the only person for which mathjax does not render latex on stackexchange ?
$endgroup$
– nicolas
Mar 1 '14 at 13:48












$begingroup$
@nicolas: you should post on meta describing your problem. This is not the place for this kind of question.
$endgroup$
– robjohn
Mar 2 '14 at 4:44




$begingroup$
@nicolas: you should post on meta describing your problem. This is not the place for this kind of question.
$endgroup$
– robjohn
Mar 2 '14 at 4:44










2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes


















24












$begingroup$

Take $x in V$. Since $P=P^2$ we must have $Px=P^2x$ and so $P(x-Px)=0$. Hence $x-Px=xi$ for some $xi in operatornameKerP$. Thus $x = Px + xi$. This shows that $V=operatornameImP + operatornameKerP$. Now take $y in operatornameImP cap operatornameKerP$. Since $y in operatornameImP$ we have $y=Pz$ for some $z in V$. Applying $P$ to both sides we get $Py=P^2z$. But $y in operatornameKerP$, hence $0=Py=P^2z=Pz=y$. This shows that $operatornameImP cap operatornameKerP=0$ and so we have $V=operatornameImP oplus operatornameKerP$.






share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    Thank you! I don't understand the last step. Why $operatornameIm P cap operatornameKer P = 0 Rightarrow V=operatornameImP oplus operatornameKerP$?
    $endgroup$
    – iblue
    Dec 18 '12 at 22:27











  • $begingroup$
    Because this is the definition of a vector space being the direct sum of two subspaces. The subspaces must span the whole space and have zero intersection.
    $endgroup$
    – Manos
    Dec 18 '12 at 22:28











  • $begingroup$
    I need to clarify that strictly speaking what you have written is not true. What is true is $Im(P) cap Ker(P)=0$ and $V=Im(P)+Ker(P)$ imply $V=Im(P)oplus Ker(P)$.
    $endgroup$
    – Manos
    Dec 18 '12 at 23:29











  • $begingroup$
    We should be writing $operatornameim P cap operatornameker P = 0$ rather than just $0$.
    $endgroup$
    – Jon Warneke
    Oct 5 '16 at 19:18


















0












$begingroup$

Hint: $V = operatornameKerP oplus operatornameImP$ iff every $vin V$ has a unique representation as $v = u+w$ for some $u in operatornameKerP, w in operatornameImP$ (If you haven't seen that already, it's not too hard to prove.)



How can you find such an expression for general $v$?






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$













    Your Answer








    StackExchange.ready(function()
    var channelOptions =
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "69"
    ;
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
    createEditor();
    );

    else
    createEditor();

    );

    function createEditor()
    StackExchange.prepareEditor(
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
    convertImagesToLinks: true,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: 10,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader:
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    ,
    noCode: true, onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    );



    );













    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function ()
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f261704%2fshow-that-the-direct-sum-of-a-kernel-of-a-projection-and-its-image-create-the-or%23new-answer', 'question_page');

    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    2 Answers
    2






    active

    oldest

    votes








    2 Answers
    2






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    24












    $begingroup$

    Take $x in V$. Since $P=P^2$ we must have $Px=P^2x$ and so $P(x-Px)=0$. Hence $x-Px=xi$ for some $xi in operatornameKerP$. Thus $x = Px + xi$. This shows that $V=operatornameImP + operatornameKerP$. Now take $y in operatornameImP cap operatornameKerP$. Since $y in operatornameImP$ we have $y=Pz$ for some $z in V$. Applying $P$ to both sides we get $Py=P^2z$. But $y in operatornameKerP$, hence $0=Py=P^2z=Pz=y$. This shows that $operatornameImP cap operatornameKerP=0$ and so we have $V=operatornameImP oplus operatornameKerP$.






    share|cite|improve this answer











    $endgroup$












    • $begingroup$
      Thank you! I don't understand the last step. Why $operatornameIm P cap operatornameKer P = 0 Rightarrow V=operatornameImP oplus operatornameKerP$?
      $endgroup$
      – iblue
      Dec 18 '12 at 22:27











    • $begingroup$
      Because this is the definition of a vector space being the direct sum of two subspaces. The subspaces must span the whole space and have zero intersection.
      $endgroup$
      – Manos
      Dec 18 '12 at 22:28











    • $begingroup$
      I need to clarify that strictly speaking what you have written is not true. What is true is $Im(P) cap Ker(P)=0$ and $V=Im(P)+Ker(P)$ imply $V=Im(P)oplus Ker(P)$.
      $endgroup$
      – Manos
      Dec 18 '12 at 23:29











    • $begingroup$
      We should be writing $operatornameim P cap operatornameker P = 0$ rather than just $0$.
      $endgroup$
      – Jon Warneke
      Oct 5 '16 at 19:18















    24












    $begingroup$

    Take $x in V$. Since $P=P^2$ we must have $Px=P^2x$ and so $P(x-Px)=0$. Hence $x-Px=xi$ for some $xi in operatornameKerP$. Thus $x = Px + xi$. This shows that $V=operatornameImP + operatornameKerP$. Now take $y in operatornameImP cap operatornameKerP$. Since $y in operatornameImP$ we have $y=Pz$ for some $z in V$. Applying $P$ to both sides we get $Py=P^2z$. But $y in operatornameKerP$, hence $0=Py=P^2z=Pz=y$. This shows that $operatornameImP cap operatornameKerP=0$ and so we have $V=operatornameImP oplus operatornameKerP$.






    share|cite|improve this answer











    $endgroup$












    • $begingroup$
      Thank you! I don't understand the last step. Why $operatornameIm P cap operatornameKer P = 0 Rightarrow V=operatornameImP oplus operatornameKerP$?
      $endgroup$
      – iblue
      Dec 18 '12 at 22:27











    • $begingroup$
      Because this is the definition of a vector space being the direct sum of two subspaces. The subspaces must span the whole space and have zero intersection.
      $endgroup$
      – Manos
      Dec 18 '12 at 22:28











    • $begingroup$
      I need to clarify that strictly speaking what you have written is not true. What is true is $Im(P) cap Ker(P)=0$ and $V=Im(P)+Ker(P)$ imply $V=Im(P)oplus Ker(P)$.
      $endgroup$
      – Manos
      Dec 18 '12 at 23:29











    • $begingroup$
      We should be writing $operatornameim P cap operatornameker P = 0$ rather than just $0$.
      $endgroup$
      – Jon Warneke
      Oct 5 '16 at 19:18













    24












    24








    24





    $begingroup$

    Take $x in V$. Since $P=P^2$ we must have $Px=P^2x$ and so $P(x-Px)=0$. Hence $x-Px=xi$ for some $xi in operatornameKerP$. Thus $x = Px + xi$. This shows that $V=operatornameImP + operatornameKerP$. Now take $y in operatornameImP cap operatornameKerP$. Since $y in operatornameImP$ we have $y=Pz$ for some $z in V$. Applying $P$ to both sides we get $Py=P^2z$. But $y in operatornameKerP$, hence $0=Py=P^2z=Pz=y$. This shows that $operatornameImP cap operatornameKerP=0$ and so we have $V=operatornameImP oplus operatornameKerP$.






    share|cite|improve this answer











    $endgroup$



    Take $x in V$. Since $P=P^2$ we must have $Px=P^2x$ and so $P(x-Px)=0$. Hence $x-Px=xi$ for some $xi in operatornameKerP$. Thus $x = Px + xi$. This shows that $V=operatornameImP + operatornameKerP$. Now take $y in operatornameImP cap operatornameKerP$. Since $y in operatornameImP$ we have $y=Pz$ for some $z in V$. Applying $P$ to both sides we get $Py=P^2z$. But $y in operatornameKerP$, hence $0=Py=P^2z=Pz=y$. This shows that $operatornameImP cap operatornameKerP=0$ and so we have $V=operatornameImP oplus operatornameKerP$.







    share|cite|improve this answer














    share|cite|improve this answer



    share|cite|improve this answer








    edited Mar 27 at 6:26









    Carlos Jiménez

    2,2841621




    2,2841621










    answered Dec 18 '12 at 22:03









    ManosManos

    14.1k33288




    14.1k33288











    • $begingroup$
      Thank you! I don't understand the last step. Why $operatornameIm P cap operatornameKer P = 0 Rightarrow V=operatornameImP oplus operatornameKerP$?
      $endgroup$
      – iblue
      Dec 18 '12 at 22:27











    • $begingroup$
      Because this is the definition of a vector space being the direct sum of two subspaces. The subspaces must span the whole space and have zero intersection.
      $endgroup$
      – Manos
      Dec 18 '12 at 22:28











    • $begingroup$
      I need to clarify that strictly speaking what you have written is not true. What is true is $Im(P) cap Ker(P)=0$ and $V=Im(P)+Ker(P)$ imply $V=Im(P)oplus Ker(P)$.
      $endgroup$
      – Manos
      Dec 18 '12 at 23:29











    • $begingroup$
      We should be writing $operatornameim P cap operatornameker P = 0$ rather than just $0$.
      $endgroup$
      – Jon Warneke
      Oct 5 '16 at 19:18
















    • $begingroup$
      Thank you! I don't understand the last step. Why $operatornameIm P cap operatornameKer P = 0 Rightarrow V=operatornameImP oplus operatornameKerP$?
      $endgroup$
      – iblue
      Dec 18 '12 at 22:27











    • $begingroup$
      Because this is the definition of a vector space being the direct sum of two subspaces. The subspaces must span the whole space and have zero intersection.
      $endgroup$
      – Manos
      Dec 18 '12 at 22:28











    • $begingroup$
      I need to clarify that strictly speaking what you have written is not true. What is true is $Im(P) cap Ker(P)=0$ and $V=Im(P)+Ker(P)$ imply $V=Im(P)oplus Ker(P)$.
      $endgroup$
      – Manos
      Dec 18 '12 at 23:29











    • $begingroup$
      We should be writing $operatornameim P cap operatornameker P = 0$ rather than just $0$.
      $endgroup$
      – Jon Warneke
      Oct 5 '16 at 19:18















    $begingroup$
    Thank you! I don't understand the last step. Why $operatornameIm P cap operatornameKer P = 0 Rightarrow V=operatornameImP oplus operatornameKerP$?
    $endgroup$
    – iblue
    Dec 18 '12 at 22:27





    $begingroup$
    Thank you! I don't understand the last step. Why $operatornameIm P cap operatornameKer P = 0 Rightarrow V=operatornameImP oplus operatornameKerP$?
    $endgroup$
    – iblue
    Dec 18 '12 at 22:27













    $begingroup$
    Because this is the definition of a vector space being the direct sum of two subspaces. The subspaces must span the whole space and have zero intersection.
    $endgroup$
    – Manos
    Dec 18 '12 at 22:28





    $begingroup$
    Because this is the definition of a vector space being the direct sum of two subspaces. The subspaces must span the whole space and have zero intersection.
    $endgroup$
    – Manos
    Dec 18 '12 at 22:28













    $begingroup$
    I need to clarify that strictly speaking what you have written is not true. What is true is $Im(P) cap Ker(P)=0$ and $V=Im(P)+Ker(P)$ imply $V=Im(P)oplus Ker(P)$.
    $endgroup$
    – Manos
    Dec 18 '12 at 23:29





    $begingroup$
    I need to clarify that strictly speaking what you have written is not true. What is true is $Im(P) cap Ker(P)=0$ and $V=Im(P)+Ker(P)$ imply $V=Im(P)oplus Ker(P)$.
    $endgroup$
    – Manos
    Dec 18 '12 at 23:29













    $begingroup$
    We should be writing $operatornameim P cap operatornameker P = 0$ rather than just $0$.
    $endgroup$
    – Jon Warneke
    Oct 5 '16 at 19:18




    $begingroup$
    We should be writing $operatornameim P cap operatornameker P = 0$ rather than just $0$.
    $endgroup$
    – Jon Warneke
    Oct 5 '16 at 19:18











    0












    $begingroup$

    Hint: $V = operatornameKerP oplus operatornameImP$ iff every $vin V$ has a unique representation as $v = u+w$ for some $u in operatornameKerP, w in operatornameImP$ (If you haven't seen that already, it's not too hard to prove.)



    How can you find such an expression for general $v$?






    share|cite|improve this answer









    $endgroup$

















      0












      $begingroup$

      Hint: $V = operatornameKerP oplus operatornameImP$ iff every $vin V$ has a unique representation as $v = u+w$ for some $u in operatornameKerP, w in operatornameImP$ (If you haven't seen that already, it's not too hard to prove.)



      How can you find such an expression for general $v$?






      share|cite|improve this answer









      $endgroup$















        0












        0








        0





        $begingroup$

        Hint: $V = operatornameKerP oplus operatornameImP$ iff every $vin V$ has a unique representation as $v = u+w$ for some $u in operatornameKerP, w in operatornameImP$ (If you haven't seen that already, it's not too hard to prove.)



        How can you find such an expression for general $v$?






        share|cite|improve this answer









        $endgroup$



        Hint: $V = operatornameKerP oplus operatornameImP$ iff every $vin V$ has a unique representation as $v = u+w$ for some $u in operatornameKerP, w in operatornameImP$ (If you haven't seen that already, it's not too hard to prove.)



        How can you find such an expression for general $v$?







        share|cite|improve this answer












        share|cite|improve this answer



        share|cite|improve this answer










        answered Dec 18 '12 at 22:13









        Tom OldfieldTom Oldfield

        9,56812058




        9,56812058



























            draft saved

            draft discarded
















































            Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid


            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

            Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function ()
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f261704%2fshow-that-the-direct-sum-of-a-kernel-of-a-projection-and-its-image-create-the-or%23new-answer', 'question_page');

            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            Popular posts from this blog

            How should I support this large drywall patch? Planned maintenance scheduled April 23, 2019 at 00:00UTC (8:00pm US/Eastern) Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara Unicorn Meta Zoo #1: Why another podcast?How do I cover large gaps in drywall?How do I keep drywall around a patch from crumbling?Can I glue a second layer of drywall?How to patch long strip on drywall?Large drywall patch: how to avoid bulging seams?Drywall Mesh Patch vs. Bulge? To remove or not to remove?How to fix this drywall job?Prep drywall before backsplashWhat's the best way to fix this horrible drywall patch job?Drywall patching using 3M Patch Plus Primer

            random experiment with two different functions on unit interval Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara Planned maintenance scheduled April 23, 2019 at 00:00UTC (8:00pm US/Eastern)Random variable and probability space notionsRandom Walk with EdgesFinding functions where the increase over a random interval is Poisson distributedNumber of days until dayCan an observed event in fact be of zero probability?Unit random processmodels of coins and uniform distributionHow to get the number of successes given $n$ trials , probability $P$ and a random variable $X$Absorbing Markov chain in a computer. Is “almost every” turned into always convergence in computer executions?Stopped random walk is not uniformly integrable

            Lowndes Grove History Architecture References Navigation menu32°48′6″N 79°57′58″W / 32.80167°N 79.96611°W / 32.80167; -79.9661132°48′6″N 79°57′58″W / 32.80167°N 79.96611°W / 32.80167; -79.9661178002500"National Register Information System"Historic houses of South Carolina"Lowndes Grove""+32° 48' 6.00", −79° 57' 58.00""Lowndes Grove, Charleston County (260 St. Margaret St., Charleston)""Lowndes Grove"The Charleston ExpositionIt Happened in South Carolina"Lowndes Grove (House), Saint Margaret Street & Sixth Avenue, Charleston, Charleston County, SC(Photographs)"Plantations of the Carolina Low Countrye