Prove $int_0^2 fraclogxsqrt4-x^2textdx=0$ without integrating Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara Planned maintenance scheduled April 17/18, 2019 at 00:00UTC (8:00pm US/Eastern)Prove that $int_0^4 fracln xsqrt4x-x^2~dx=0$ (without trigonometric substitution)Complex logarithmic integral having Trigonometric functionIntegral $int_0^pi/2 fracsin^3 xlog sin xsqrt1+sin^2 xdx=fracln 2 -14$Integral $int_0^1fracdxsqrtlog frac1x=sqrt pi$Evaluation of $int_0^1 fracx^32(2-x^2)(1+x^2) + 3sqrt(2-x^2)(1+x^2),mathrm dx$Why does $int_0^1 frac 1 sqrt x (1 - x) , mathrm d x = pi$?On $int fracdx1+x^2$How to solve the Integral $intfrac1sqrt1-sqrt4-x dx$ with stepsIntegrating $int_0^fracpi2 x (logtan x)^2n+1;dx$Show that $intlimits_0^fracpi24cos^2(x)log^2(cos x)~mathrm dx=-pilog 2+pilog^2 2-fracpi2+fracpi^312$Baaad: $int_0^pi/2logbigg(frac2+sin2x2-sin2xbigg)mathrm dx$Integration by Substitution in $int_0^inftyx^rfrac 1sqrt2pixe^-(log x)^2/2[sin(2pilog x)]dx$

Is "Reachable Object" really an NP-complete problem?

Can you use the Shield Master feat to shove someone before you make an attack by using a Readied action?

How to write this math term? with cases it isn't working

Why are the trig functions versine, haversine, exsecant, etc, rarely used in modern mathematics?

What is the meaning of the new sigil in Game of Thrones Season 8 intro?

Significance of Cersei's obsession with elephants?

How to find all the available tools in mac terminal?

How do I make this wiring inside cabinet safer? (Pic)

Is there any way for the UK Prime Minister to make a motion directly dependent on Government confidence?

Does classifying an integer as a discrete log require it be part of a multiplicative group?

Generate an RGB colour grid

If my PI received research grants from a company to be able to pay my postdoc salary, did I have a potential conflict interest too?

Wu formula for manifolds with boundary

What does this Jacques Hadamard quote mean?

What causes the direction of lightning flashes?

Is CEO the profession with the most psychopaths?

Crossing US/Canada Border for less than 24 hours

What does "lightly crushed" mean for cardamon pods?

How come Sam didn't become Lord of Horn Hill?

When a candle burns, why does the top of wick glow if bottom of flame is hottest?

What is the longest distance a player character can jump in one leap?

また usage in a dictionary

Trademark violation for app?

Withdrew £2800, but only £2000 shows as withdrawn on online banking; what are my obligations?



Prove $int_0^2 fraclogxsqrt4-x^2textdx=0$ without integrating



Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara
Planned maintenance scheduled April 17/18, 2019 at 00:00UTC (8:00pm US/Eastern)Prove that $int_0^4 fracln xsqrt4x-x^2~dx=0$ (without trigonometric substitution)Complex logarithmic integral having Trigonometric functionIntegral $int_0^pi/2 fracsin^3 xlog sin xsqrt1+sin^2 xdx=fracln 2 -14$Integral $int_0^1fracdxsqrtlog frac1x=sqrt pi$Evaluation of $int_0^1 fracx^32(2-x^2)(1+x^2) + 3sqrt(2-x^2)(1+x^2),mathrm dx$Why does $int_0^1 frac 1 sqrt x (1 - x) , mathrm d x = pi$?On $int fracdx1+x^2$How to solve the Integral $intfrac1sqrt1-sqrt4-x dx$ with stepsIntegrating $int_0^fracpi2 x (logtan x)^2n+1;dx$Show that $intlimits_0^fracpi24cos^2(x)log^2(cos x)~mathrm dx=-pilog 2+pilog^2 2-fracpi2+fracpi^312$Baaad: $int_0^pi/2logbigg(frac2+sin2x2-sin2xbigg)mathrm dx$Integration by Substitution in $int_0^inftyx^rfrac 1sqrt2pixe^-(log x)^2/2[sin(2pilog x)]dx$










3












$begingroup$


Inspired by this post:



Prove that $int_0^4 fracln xsqrt4x-x^2~dx=0$ (without trigonometric substitution)



I was wondering if there exists a similar pair of substitutions for the following integral:



$$I = int_0^2 fraclogxsqrt4-x^2textdx$$



More precisely:



Does there exist a linear and non-linear transformation (or possibly two non-linear transformations) $u(x), v(x)$ such that by applying them to the above integral, we can obtain $aI = bI$ where $mathbbR ni a neq b in mathbbR$










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$
















    3












    $begingroup$


    Inspired by this post:



    Prove that $int_0^4 fracln xsqrt4x-x^2~dx=0$ (without trigonometric substitution)



    I was wondering if there exists a similar pair of substitutions for the following integral:



    $$I = int_0^2 fraclogxsqrt4-x^2textdx$$



    More precisely:



    Does there exist a linear and non-linear transformation (or possibly two non-linear transformations) $u(x), v(x)$ such that by applying them to the above integral, we can obtain $aI = bI$ where $mathbbR ni a neq b in mathbbR$










    share|cite|improve this question









    $endgroup$














      3












      3








      3


      3



      $begingroup$


      Inspired by this post:



      Prove that $int_0^4 fracln xsqrt4x-x^2~dx=0$ (without trigonometric substitution)



      I was wondering if there exists a similar pair of substitutions for the following integral:



      $$I = int_0^2 fraclogxsqrt4-x^2textdx$$



      More precisely:



      Does there exist a linear and non-linear transformation (or possibly two non-linear transformations) $u(x), v(x)$ such that by applying them to the above integral, we can obtain $aI = bI$ where $mathbbR ni a neq b in mathbbR$










      share|cite|improve this question









      $endgroup$




      Inspired by this post:



      Prove that $int_0^4 fracln xsqrt4x-x^2~dx=0$ (without trigonometric substitution)



      I was wondering if there exists a similar pair of substitutions for the following integral:



      $$I = int_0^2 fraclogxsqrt4-x^2textdx$$



      More precisely:



      Does there exist a linear and non-linear transformation (or possibly two non-linear transformations) $u(x), v(x)$ such that by applying them to the above integral, we can obtain $aI = bI$ where $mathbbR ni a neq b in mathbbR$







      integration substitution






      share|cite|improve this question













      share|cite|improve this question











      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question










      asked Mar 27 at 7:57









      Jack LamJack Lam

      2,0741826




      2,0741826




















          2 Answers
          2






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          5












          $begingroup$

          I have clearly overthought this.



          Substitute $x mapsto x^2$ to transform $I$ into a quarter of the integral linked.



          Nesting the transformations, we find the appropriate non-linear transformations for this integral are:



          $$umapsto sqrt4-x^2, u mapsto x^2 - 2$$



          Resulting in:



          $$I=frac12int_0^2fraclog(4-u^2)sqrt4-u^2textdu$$



          $$I=frac14int_-2^2fraclog(2+u)sqrt4-u^2textdu=frac14int_0^2fraclog(4-u^2)sqrt4-u^2textdu$$



          $$I = fracmathcalI2 = fracmathcalI4$$






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$












          • $begingroup$
            Nice approach (+1)
            $endgroup$
            – Robert Z
            Mar 27 at 11:32










          • $begingroup$
            Nice gymnastics ! and $to +1$ for sure.
            $endgroup$
            – Claude Leibovici
            Mar 27 at 11:34


















          3












          $begingroup$

          I found a way of proving that $I=2I$ without integrating, although it is not similar to the one explained in the linked post.



          Let $x=2sin(t)$ then
          $$beginalignI&=int_0^pi/2log(2sin(t)),dt\
          &=int_0^pi/2log(4sin(t/2)cos(t/2)),dt\
          &=int_0^pi/2log(2sin(t/2)),dt+int_0^pi/2log(2cos(t/2)),dt\
          &=int_0^pi/2log(2sin(t/2)),dt+int_pi/2^pilog(2sin(s/2)),ds\
          &=int_0^pilog(2sin(s/2)),ds=2int_0^pi/2log(2sin(u)),du=2I
          endalign$$

          where $s=pi-t$ and $u=s/2$. Hence $I=0$.






          share|cite|improve this answer











          $endgroup$












          • $begingroup$
            While this is a quite neat way of proving the given equality, the OP asks for a similar pair of substitutions $($similiar to the linked post$)$, namely a pair of linear and non-linear transformation in order to achieve the result.
            $endgroup$
            – mrtaurho
            Mar 27 at 9:22






          • 1




            $begingroup$
            I missed the day when you reached the $100k$ reputation. Congratulations and thanks for posting so good answers so often. Cheers :-)
            $endgroup$
            – Claude Leibovici
            Mar 27 at 9:38










          • $begingroup$
            @ClaudeLeibovici Thanks for your generous comments!
            $endgroup$
            – Robert Z
            Mar 27 at 11:26










          • $begingroup$
            @mrtaurho It seems that OP found the appropriate non-linear transformations
            $endgroup$
            – Robert Z
            Mar 27 at 11:27











          Your Answer








          StackExchange.ready(function()
          var channelOptions =
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "69"
          ;
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
          createEditor();
          );

          else
          createEditor();

          );

          function createEditor()
          StackExchange.prepareEditor(
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
          convertImagesToLinks: true,
          noModals: true,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: 10,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          imageUploader:
          brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
          contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
          allowUrls: true
          ,
          noCode: true, onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          );



          );













          draft saved

          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function ()
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3164209%2fprove-int-02-frac-logx-sqrt4-x2-textdx-0-without-integrating%23new-answer', 'question_page');

          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown

























          2 Answers
          2






          active

          oldest

          votes








          2 Answers
          2






          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes









          5












          $begingroup$

          I have clearly overthought this.



          Substitute $x mapsto x^2$ to transform $I$ into a quarter of the integral linked.



          Nesting the transformations, we find the appropriate non-linear transformations for this integral are:



          $$umapsto sqrt4-x^2, u mapsto x^2 - 2$$



          Resulting in:



          $$I=frac12int_0^2fraclog(4-u^2)sqrt4-u^2textdu$$



          $$I=frac14int_-2^2fraclog(2+u)sqrt4-u^2textdu=frac14int_0^2fraclog(4-u^2)sqrt4-u^2textdu$$



          $$I = fracmathcalI2 = fracmathcalI4$$






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$












          • $begingroup$
            Nice approach (+1)
            $endgroup$
            – Robert Z
            Mar 27 at 11:32










          • $begingroup$
            Nice gymnastics ! and $to +1$ for sure.
            $endgroup$
            – Claude Leibovici
            Mar 27 at 11:34















          5












          $begingroup$

          I have clearly overthought this.



          Substitute $x mapsto x^2$ to transform $I$ into a quarter of the integral linked.



          Nesting the transformations, we find the appropriate non-linear transformations for this integral are:



          $$umapsto sqrt4-x^2, u mapsto x^2 - 2$$



          Resulting in:



          $$I=frac12int_0^2fraclog(4-u^2)sqrt4-u^2textdu$$



          $$I=frac14int_-2^2fraclog(2+u)sqrt4-u^2textdu=frac14int_0^2fraclog(4-u^2)sqrt4-u^2textdu$$



          $$I = fracmathcalI2 = fracmathcalI4$$






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$












          • $begingroup$
            Nice approach (+1)
            $endgroup$
            – Robert Z
            Mar 27 at 11:32










          • $begingroup$
            Nice gymnastics ! and $to +1$ for sure.
            $endgroup$
            – Claude Leibovici
            Mar 27 at 11:34













          5












          5








          5





          $begingroup$

          I have clearly overthought this.



          Substitute $x mapsto x^2$ to transform $I$ into a quarter of the integral linked.



          Nesting the transformations, we find the appropriate non-linear transformations for this integral are:



          $$umapsto sqrt4-x^2, u mapsto x^2 - 2$$



          Resulting in:



          $$I=frac12int_0^2fraclog(4-u^2)sqrt4-u^2textdu$$



          $$I=frac14int_-2^2fraclog(2+u)sqrt4-u^2textdu=frac14int_0^2fraclog(4-u^2)sqrt4-u^2textdu$$



          $$I = fracmathcalI2 = fracmathcalI4$$






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$



          I have clearly overthought this.



          Substitute $x mapsto x^2$ to transform $I$ into a quarter of the integral linked.



          Nesting the transformations, we find the appropriate non-linear transformations for this integral are:



          $$umapsto sqrt4-x^2, u mapsto x^2 - 2$$



          Resulting in:



          $$I=frac12int_0^2fraclog(4-u^2)sqrt4-u^2textdu$$



          $$I=frac14int_-2^2fraclog(2+u)sqrt4-u^2textdu=frac14int_0^2fraclog(4-u^2)sqrt4-u^2textdu$$



          $$I = fracmathcalI2 = fracmathcalI4$$







          share|cite|improve this answer












          share|cite|improve this answer



          share|cite|improve this answer










          answered Mar 27 at 10:47









          Jack LamJack Lam

          2,0741826




          2,0741826











          • $begingroup$
            Nice approach (+1)
            $endgroup$
            – Robert Z
            Mar 27 at 11:32










          • $begingroup$
            Nice gymnastics ! and $to +1$ for sure.
            $endgroup$
            – Claude Leibovici
            Mar 27 at 11:34
















          • $begingroup$
            Nice approach (+1)
            $endgroup$
            – Robert Z
            Mar 27 at 11:32










          • $begingroup$
            Nice gymnastics ! and $to +1$ for sure.
            $endgroup$
            – Claude Leibovici
            Mar 27 at 11:34















          $begingroup$
          Nice approach (+1)
          $endgroup$
          – Robert Z
          Mar 27 at 11:32




          $begingroup$
          Nice approach (+1)
          $endgroup$
          – Robert Z
          Mar 27 at 11:32












          $begingroup$
          Nice gymnastics ! and $to +1$ for sure.
          $endgroup$
          – Claude Leibovici
          Mar 27 at 11:34




          $begingroup$
          Nice gymnastics ! and $to +1$ for sure.
          $endgroup$
          – Claude Leibovici
          Mar 27 at 11:34











          3












          $begingroup$

          I found a way of proving that $I=2I$ without integrating, although it is not similar to the one explained in the linked post.



          Let $x=2sin(t)$ then
          $$beginalignI&=int_0^pi/2log(2sin(t)),dt\
          &=int_0^pi/2log(4sin(t/2)cos(t/2)),dt\
          &=int_0^pi/2log(2sin(t/2)),dt+int_0^pi/2log(2cos(t/2)),dt\
          &=int_0^pi/2log(2sin(t/2)),dt+int_pi/2^pilog(2sin(s/2)),ds\
          &=int_0^pilog(2sin(s/2)),ds=2int_0^pi/2log(2sin(u)),du=2I
          endalign$$

          where $s=pi-t$ and $u=s/2$. Hence $I=0$.






          share|cite|improve this answer











          $endgroup$












          • $begingroup$
            While this is a quite neat way of proving the given equality, the OP asks for a similar pair of substitutions $($similiar to the linked post$)$, namely a pair of linear and non-linear transformation in order to achieve the result.
            $endgroup$
            – mrtaurho
            Mar 27 at 9:22






          • 1




            $begingroup$
            I missed the day when you reached the $100k$ reputation. Congratulations and thanks for posting so good answers so often. Cheers :-)
            $endgroup$
            – Claude Leibovici
            Mar 27 at 9:38










          • $begingroup$
            @ClaudeLeibovici Thanks for your generous comments!
            $endgroup$
            – Robert Z
            Mar 27 at 11:26










          • $begingroup$
            @mrtaurho It seems that OP found the appropriate non-linear transformations
            $endgroup$
            – Robert Z
            Mar 27 at 11:27















          3












          $begingroup$

          I found a way of proving that $I=2I$ without integrating, although it is not similar to the one explained in the linked post.



          Let $x=2sin(t)$ then
          $$beginalignI&=int_0^pi/2log(2sin(t)),dt\
          &=int_0^pi/2log(4sin(t/2)cos(t/2)),dt\
          &=int_0^pi/2log(2sin(t/2)),dt+int_0^pi/2log(2cos(t/2)),dt\
          &=int_0^pi/2log(2sin(t/2)),dt+int_pi/2^pilog(2sin(s/2)),ds\
          &=int_0^pilog(2sin(s/2)),ds=2int_0^pi/2log(2sin(u)),du=2I
          endalign$$

          where $s=pi-t$ and $u=s/2$. Hence $I=0$.






          share|cite|improve this answer











          $endgroup$












          • $begingroup$
            While this is a quite neat way of proving the given equality, the OP asks for a similar pair of substitutions $($similiar to the linked post$)$, namely a pair of linear and non-linear transformation in order to achieve the result.
            $endgroup$
            – mrtaurho
            Mar 27 at 9:22






          • 1




            $begingroup$
            I missed the day when you reached the $100k$ reputation. Congratulations and thanks for posting so good answers so often. Cheers :-)
            $endgroup$
            – Claude Leibovici
            Mar 27 at 9:38










          • $begingroup$
            @ClaudeLeibovici Thanks for your generous comments!
            $endgroup$
            – Robert Z
            Mar 27 at 11:26










          • $begingroup$
            @mrtaurho It seems that OP found the appropriate non-linear transformations
            $endgroup$
            – Robert Z
            Mar 27 at 11:27













          3












          3








          3





          $begingroup$

          I found a way of proving that $I=2I$ without integrating, although it is not similar to the one explained in the linked post.



          Let $x=2sin(t)$ then
          $$beginalignI&=int_0^pi/2log(2sin(t)),dt\
          &=int_0^pi/2log(4sin(t/2)cos(t/2)),dt\
          &=int_0^pi/2log(2sin(t/2)),dt+int_0^pi/2log(2cos(t/2)),dt\
          &=int_0^pi/2log(2sin(t/2)),dt+int_pi/2^pilog(2sin(s/2)),ds\
          &=int_0^pilog(2sin(s/2)),ds=2int_0^pi/2log(2sin(u)),du=2I
          endalign$$

          where $s=pi-t$ and $u=s/2$. Hence $I=0$.






          share|cite|improve this answer











          $endgroup$



          I found a way of proving that $I=2I$ without integrating, although it is not similar to the one explained in the linked post.



          Let $x=2sin(t)$ then
          $$beginalignI&=int_0^pi/2log(2sin(t)),dt\
          &=int_0^pi/2log(4sin(t/2)cos(t/2)),dt\
          &=int_0^pi/2log(2sin(t/2)),dt+int_0^pi/2log(2cos(t/2)),dt\
          &=int_0^pi/2log(2sin(t/2)),dt+int_pi/2^pilog(2sin(s/2)),ds\
          &=int_0^pilog(2sin(s/2)),ds=2int_0^pi/2log(2sin(u)),du=2I
          endalign$$

          where $s=pi-t$ and $u=s/2$. Hence $I=0$.







          share|cite|improve this answer














          share|cite|improve this answer



          share|cite|improve this answer








          edited Mar 27 at 11:31

























          answered Mar 27 at 9:12









          Robert ZRobert Z

          102k1072145




          102k1072145











          • $begingroup$
            While this is a quite neat way of proving the given equality, the OP asks for a similar pair of substitutions $($similiar to the linked post$)$, namely a pair of linear and non-linear transformation in order to achieve the result.
            $endgroup$
            – mrtaurho
            Mar 27 at 9:22






          • 1




            $begingroup$
            I missed the day when you reached the $100k$ reputation. Congratulations and thanks for posting so good answers so often. Cheers :-)
            $endgroup$
            – Claude Leibovici
            Mar 27 at 9:38










          • $begingroup$
            @ClaudeLeibovici Thanks for your generous comments!
            $endgroup$
            – Robert Z
            Mar 27 at 11:26










          • $begingroup$
            @mrtaurho It seems that OP found the appropriate non-linear transformations
            $endgroup$
            – Robert Z
            Mar 27 at 11:27
















          • $begingroup$
            While this is a quite neat way of proving the given equality, the OP asks for a similar pair of substitutions $($similiar to the linked post$)$, namely a pair of linear and non-linear transformation in order to achieve the result.
            $endgroup$
            – mrtaurho
            Mar 27 at 9:22






          • 1




            $begingroup$
            I missed the day when you reached the $100k$ reputation. Congratulations and thanks for posting so good answers so often. Cheers :-)
            $endgroup$
            – Claude Leibovici
            Mar 27 at 9:38










          • $begingroup$
            @ClaudeLeibovici Thanks for your generous comments!
            $endgroup$
            – Robert Z
            Mar 27 at 11:26










          • $begingroup$
            @mrtaurho It seems that OP found the appropriate non-linear transformations
            $endgroup$
            – Robert Z
            Mar 27 at 11:27















          $begingroup$
          While this is a quite neat way of proving the given equality, the OP asks for a similar pair of substitutions $($similiar to the linked post$)$, namely a pair of linear and non-linear transformation in order to achieve the result.
          $endgroup$
          – mrtaurho
          Mar 27 at 9:22




          $begingroup$
          While this is a quite neat way of proving the given equality, the OP asks for a similar pair of substitutions $($similiar to the linked post$)$, namely a pair of linear and non-linear transformation in order to achieve the result.
          $endgroup$
          – mrtaurho
          Mar 27 at 9:22




          1




          1




          $begingroup$
          I missed the day when you reached the $100k$ reputation. Congratulations and thanks for posting so good answers so often. Cheers :-)
          $endgroup$
          – Claude Leibovici
          Mar 27 at 9:38




          $begingroup$
          I missed the day when you reached the $100k$ reputation. Congratulations and thanks for posting so good answers so often. Cheers :-)
          $endgroup$
          – Claude Leibovici
          Mar 27 at 9:38












          $begingroup$
          @ClaudeLeibovici Thanks for your generous comments!
          $endgroup$
          – Robert Z
          Mar 27 at 11:26




          $begingroup$
          @ClaudeLeibovici Thanks for your generous comments!
          $endgroup$
          – Robert Z
          Mar 27 at 11:26












          $begingroup$
          @mrtaurho It seems that OP found the appropriate non-linear transformations
          $endgroup$
          – Robert Z
          Mar 27 at 11:27




          $begingroup$
          @mrtaurho It seems that OP found the appropriate non-linear transformations
          $endgroup$
          – Robert Z
          Mar 27 at 11:27

















          draft saved

          draft discarded
















































          Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

          But avoid


          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

          Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




          draft saved


          draft discarded














          StackExchange.ready(
          function ()
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3164209%2fprove-int-02-frac-logx-sqrt4-x2-textdx-0-without-integrating%23new-answer', 'question_page');

          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown





















































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown

































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown







          Popular posts from this blog

          How should I support this large drywall patch? Planned maintenance scheduled April 23, 2019 at 00:00UTC (8:00pm US/Eastern) Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara Unicorn Meta Zoo #1: Why another podcast?How do I cover large gaps in drywall?How do I keep drywall around a patch from crumbling?Can I glue a second layer of drywall?How to patch long strip on drywall?Large drywall patch: how to avoid bulging seams?Drywall Mesh Patch vs. Bulge? To remove or not to remove?How to fix this drywall job?Prep drywall before backsplashWhat's the best way to fix this horrible drywall patch job?Drywall patching using 3M Patch Plus Primer

          random experiment with two different functions on unit interval Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara Planned maintenance scheduled April 23, 2019 at 00:00UTC (8:00pm US/Eastern)Random variable and probability space notionsRandom Walk with EdgesFinding functions where the increase over a random interval is Poisson distributedNumber of days until dayCan an observed event in fact be of zero probability?Unit random processmodels of coins and uniform distributionHow to get the number of successes given $n$ trials , probability $P$ and a random variable $X$Absorbing Markov chain in a computer. Is “almost every” turned into always convergence in computer executions?Stopped random walk is not uniformly integrable

          Lowndes Grove History Architecture References Navigation menu32°48′6″N 79°57′58″W / 32.80167°N 79.96611°W / 32.80167; -79.9661132°48′6″N 79°57′58″W / 32.80167°N 79.96611°W / 32.80167; -79.9661178002500"National Register Information System"Historic houses of South Carolina"Lowndes Grove""+32° 48' 6.00", −79° 57' 58.00""Lowndes Grove, Charleston County (260 St. Margaret St., Charleston)""Lowndes Grove"The Charleston ExpositionIt Happened in South Carolina"Lowndes Grove (House), Saint Margaret Street & Sixth Avenue, Charleston, Charleston County, SC(Photographs)"Plantations of the Carolina Low Countrye