Is this subalgebra semisimple? The 2019 Stack Overflow Developer Survey Results Are InIf $mathfrakg$ admits a decomposition then it is semisimpleMaximal nilpotent and solvable Lie subalgebrasLie subalgebra generated by a subset of a basis of root systemIs the assignment of a root system to a semisimple Lie algebra functorial?Root decomposition implies semisimpleVerma module analogue for non-semisimple Lie algebrasSemisimple complex Lie algebra of type $A_3$ contains a Lie subalgebra of type $B_2$ as fixed points of an automorphism.Intersection of Radical With Semisimple SubalgebraDecomposition of the maximal nilpotent subalgebra of the simple Lie algebraQuestions about parabolic algebra
What is this 4-propeller plane?
Does a dangling wire really electrocute me if I'm standing in water?
Inline version of a function returns different value then non-inline version
How to reverse every other sublist of a list?
"What time...?" or "At what time...?" - what is more grammatically correct?
Access elements in std::string where positon of string is greater than its size
Is three citations per paragraph excessive for undergraduate research paper?
How to change the limits of integration
Why is the maximum length of openwrt’s root password 8 characters?
Lethal sonic weapons
Inversion Puzzle
JSON.serialize: is it possible to suppress null values of a map?
Does duplicating a spell with Wish count as casting that spell?
Which Sci-Fi work first showed weapon of galactic-scale mass destruction?
Spanish for "widget"
Are USB sockets on wall outlets live all the time, even when the switch is off?
How to make payment on the internet without leaving a money trail?
What are the motivations for publishing new editions of an existing textbook, beyond new discoveries in a field?
Realistic Alternatives to Dust: What Else Could Feed a Plankton Bloom?
I looked up a future colleague on LinkedIn before I started a job. I told my colleague about it and he seemed surprised. Should I apologize?
How long do I have to send payment?
What does Linus Torvalds means when he says that git "never ever" tracks a file?
Why don't Unix/Linux systems traverse through directories until they find the required version of a linked library?
Is it possible for the two major parties in the UK to form a coalition with each other instead of a much smaller party?
Is this subalgebra semisimple?
The 2019 Stack Overflow Developer Survey Results Are InIf $mathfrakg$ admits a decomposition then it is semisimpleMaximal nilpotent and solvable Lie subalgebrasLie subalgebra generated by a subset of a basis of root systemIs the assignment of a root system to a semisimple Lie algebra functorial?Root decomposition implies semisimpleVerma module analogue for non-semisimple Lie algebrasSemisimple complex Lie algebra of type $A_3$ contains a Lie subalgebra of type $B_2$ as fixed points of an automorphism.Intersection of Radical With Semisimple SubalgebraDecomposition of the maximal nilpotent subalgebra of the simple Lie algebraQuestions about parabolic algebra
$begingroup$
Denote by $mathfrakg$ a complex semisimple Lie algebra and let $mathfrakh$ be a Cartan subalgebra of $mathfrakg$.
Let $Phi$
be the root system of $(mathfrakg,mathfrakh)$ and denote by $mathfrakg_alpha$ the root subspace of $mathfrakg$ corresponding
to a root $alpha$.
We fix a choice of positive roots $Phi^+$, and let $Delta$ be the corresponding subset of simple roots in $Phi^+$. Note that each subset $IsubseteqDelta$ generates a root system $Phi_IsubseteqPhi$, with positive roots $Phi_I^+:=Phi_Icap Phi^+$.
Let
$
mathfrakl_I:=mathfrakhoplussum_alphainPhi_Imathfrakg_alpha
$.
My questions:
Is $mathfrakl_I$ complex semsimple? If so, why?
Is $mathfrakl_I$ a Levi subalgebra of $mathfrakg$?
lie-algebras
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Denote by $mathfrakg$ a complex semisimple Lie algebra and let $mathfrakh$ be a Cartan subalgebra of $mathfrakg$.
Let $Phi$
be the root system of $(mathfrakg,mathfrakh)$ and denote by $mathfrakg_alpha$ the root subspace of $mathfrakg$ corresponding
to a root $alpha$.
We fix a choice of positive roots $Phi^+$, and let $Delta$ be the corresponding subset of simple roots in $Phi^+$. Note that each subset $IsubseteqDelta$ generates a root system $Phi_IsubseteqPhi$, with positive roots $Phi_I^+:=Phi_Icap Phi^+$.
Let
$
mathfrakl_I:=mathfrakhoplussum_alphainPhi_Imathfrakg_alpha
$.
My questions:
Is $mathfrakl_I$ complex semsimple? If so, why?
Is $mathfrakl_I$ a Levi subalgebra of $mathfrakg$?
lie-algebras
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Rarely semi-simple, because $mathfrak h$ is too big, but invariably reductive.
$endgroup$
– paul garrett
Mar 23 at 1:21
$begingroup$
However, when $I=Delta$, we get $mathfrakl_I=mathfrakg$ is complex semisimple while the $mathfrakh$ is still big. How to explain this?
$endgroup$
– James Cheung
Mar 23 at 1:34
1
$begingroup$
Well, in the semi-simple case all of $mathfrak h$ is hit by brackets from the root spaces, while this is not so for proper $I$.
$endgroup$
– paul garrett
Mar 23 at 1:39
$begingroup$
One thing that helps would be to figure out the centre of $mathfrakl_I$.
$endgroup$
– Torsten Schoeneberg
Mar 23 at 8:57
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Denote by $mathfrakg$ a complex semisimple Lie algebra and let $mathfrakh$ be a Cartan subalgebra of $mathfrakg$.
Let $Phi$
be the root system of $(mathfrakg,mathfrakh)$ and denote by $mathfrakg_alpha$ the root subspace of $mathfrakg$ corresponding
to a root $alpha$.
We fix a choice of positive roots $Phi^+$, and let $Delta$ be the corresponding subset of simple roots in $Phi^+$. Note that each subset $IsubseteqDelta$ generates a root system $Phi_IsubseteqPhi$, with positive roots $Phi_I^+:=Phi_Icap Phi^+$.
Let
$
mathfrakl_I:=mathfrakhoplussum_alphainPhi_Imathfrakg_alpha
$.
My questions:
Is $mathfrakl_I$ complex semsimple? If so, why?
Is $mathfrakl_I$ a Levi subalgebra of $mathfrakg$?
lie-algebras
$endgroup$
Denote by $mathfrakg$ a complex semisimple Lie algebra and let $mathfrakh$ be a Cartan subalgebra of $mathfrakg$.
Let $Phi$
be the root system of $(mathfrakg,mathfrakh)$ and denote by $mathfrakg_alpha$ the root subspace of $mathfrakg$ corresponding
to a root $alpha$.
We fix a choice of positive roots $Phi^+$, and let $Delta$ be the corresponding subset of simple roots in $Phi^+$. Note that each subset $IsubseteqDelta$ generates a root system $Phi_IsubseteqPhi$, with positive roots $Phi_I^+:=Phi_Icap Phi^+$.
Let
$
mathfrakl_I:=mathfrakhoplussum_alphainPhi_Imathfrakg_alpha
$.
My questions:
Is $mathfrakl_I$ complex semsimple? If so, why?
Is $mathfrakl_I$ a Levi subalgebra of $mathfrakg$?
lie-algebras
lie-algebras
edited Mar 23 at 1:07
Bernard
124k741117
124k741117
asked Mar 23 at 1:03
James CheungJames Cheung
1236
1236
$begingroup$
Rarely semi-simple, because $mathfrak h$ is too big, but invariably reductive.
$endgroup$
– paul garrett
Mar 23 at 1:21
$begingroup$
However, when $I=Delta$, we get $mathfrakl_I=mathfrakg$ is complex semisimple while the $mathfrakh$ is still big. How to explain this?
$endgroup$
– James Cheung
Mar 23 at 1:34
1
$begingroup$
Well, in the semi-simple case all of $mathfrak h$ is hit by brackets from the root spaces, while this is not so for proper $I$.
$endgroup$
– paul garrett
Mar 23 at 1:39
$begingroup$
One thing that helps would be to figure out the centre of $mathfrakl_I$.
$endgroup$
– Torsten Schoeneberg
Mar 23 at 8:57
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Rarely semi-simple, because $mathfrak h$ is too big, but invariably reductive.
$endgroup$
– paul garrett
Mar 23 at 1:21
$begingroup$
However, when $I=Delta$, we get $mathfrakl_I=mathfrakg$ is complex semisimple while the $mathfrakh$ is still big. How to explain this?
$endgroup$
– James Cheung
Mar 23 at 1:34
1
$begingroup$
Well, in the semi-simple case all of $mathfrak h$ is hit by brackets from the root spaces, while this is not so for proper $I$.
$endgroup$
– paul garrett
Mar 23 at 1:39
$begingroup$
One thing that helps would be to figure out the centre of $mathfrakl_I$.
$endgroup$
– Torsten Schoeneberg
Mar 23 at 8:57
$begingroup$
Rarely semi-simple, because $mathfrak h$ is too big, but invariably reductive.
$endgroup$
– paul garrett
Mar 23 at 1:21
$begingroup$
Rarely semi-simple, because $mathfrak h$ is too big, but invariably reductive.
$endgroup$
– paul garrett
Mar 23 at 1:21
$begingroup$
However, when $I=Delta$, we get $mathfrakl_I=mathfrakg$ is complex semisimple while the $mathfrakh$ is still big. How to explain this?
$endgroup$
– James Cheung
Mar 23 at 1:34
$begingroup$
However, when $I=Delta$, we get $mathfrakl_I=mathfrakg$ is complex semisimple while the $mathfrakh$ is still big. How to explain this?
$endgroup$
– James Cheung
Mar 23 at 1:34
1
1
$begingroup$
Well, in the semi-simple case all of $mathfrak h$ is hit by brackets from the root spaces, while this is not so for proper $I$.
$endgroup$
– paul garrett
Mar 23 at 1:39
$begingroup$
Well, in the semi-simple case all of $mathfrak h$ is hit by brackets from the root spaces, while this is not so for proper $I$.
$endgroup$
– paul garrett
Mar 23 at 1:39
$begingroup$
One thing that helps would be to figure out the centre of $mathfrakl_I$.
$endgroup$
– Torsten Schoeneberg
Mar 23 at 8:57
$begingroup$
One thing that helps would be to figure out the centre of $mathfrakl_I$.
$endgroup$
– Torsten Schoeneberg
Mar 23 at 8:57
add a comment |
0
active
oldest
votes
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
);
);
, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);
else
createEditor();
);
function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);
);
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3158840%2fis-this-subalgebra-semisimple%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
0
active
oldest
votes
0
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3158840%2fis-this-subalgebra-semisimple%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
$begingroup$
Rarely semi-simple, because $mathfrak h$ is too big, but invariably reductive.
$endgroup$
– paul garrett
Mar 23 at 1:21
$begingroup$
However, when $I=Delta$, we get $mathfrakl_I=mathfrakg$ is complex semisimple while the $mathfrakh$ is still big. How to explain this?
$endgroup$
– James Cheung
Mar 23 at 1:34
1
$begingroup$
Well, in the semi-simple case all of $mathfrak h$ is hit by brackets from the root spaces, while this is not so for proper $I$.
$endgroup$
– paul garrett
Mar 23 at 1:39
$begingroup$
One thing that helps would be to figure out the centre of $mathfrakl_I$.
$endgroup$
– Torsten Schoeneberg
Mar 23 at 8:57