fix point solution or approximation available? logistic regression? The 2019 Stack Overflow Developer Survey Results Are InLogistic regression giving negative predictions?multiple classes logistic regression probabilityLogistic regression with arbitrary labelsLoss function for logistic regressionWhat do the parameters of a multinomial logistic regression correspond to?Logistic regression of large datasetThe derivative of logistic regressionLogistic regression with weighted variablesLogistic regression - Transposing formulasKolmogorov–Smirnov test in logistic regression

"To split hairs" vs "To be pedantic"

Should I use my personal or workplace e-mail when registering to external websites for work purpose?

Manuscript was "unsubmitted" because the manuscript was deposited in Arxiv Preprints

Spanish for "widget"

How to reverse every other sublist of a list?

How come people say “Would of”?

Where to refill my bottle in India?

Idiomatic way to prevent slicing?

How long do I have to send payment?

Extreme, unacceptable situation and I can't attend work tomorrow morning

I see my dog run

What is the use of option -o in the useradd command?

What do hard-Brexiteers want with respect to the Irish border?

What could be the right powersource for 15 seconds lifespan disposable giant chainsaw?

Should I write numbers in words or as numerals when there are multiple next to each other?

Why do UK politicians seemingly ignore opinion polls on Brexit?

Output the Arecibo Message

Realistic Alternatives to Dust: What Else Could Feed a Plankton Bloom?

How to answer pointed "are you quitting" questioning when I don't want them to suspect

Patience, young "Padovan"

What can other administrators access on my machine?

What does Linus Torvalds mean when he says that Git "never ever" tracks a file?

Is flight data recorder erased after every flight?

Inversion Puzzle



fix point solution or approximation available? logistic regression?



The 2019 Stack Overflow Developer Survey Results Are InLogistic regression giving negative predictions?multiple classes logistic regression probabilityLogistic regression with arbitrary labelsLoss function for logistic regressionWhat do the parameters of a multinomial logistic regression correspond to?Logistic regression of large datasetThe derivative of logistic regressionLogistic regression with weighted variablesLogistic regression - Transposing formulasKolmogorov–Smirnov test in logistic regression










1












$begingroup$


please, is there a simple closed-form or approximation to the following fixed-point problem in $x$? $x$ is the value searched for. $m$, $g$ and $N$ are real parameters, all greater than 0,



beginequation
x=frac11+m g^-N x
endequation



any insights on properties of $x$ are very welcome! In particular, comments about how $x$ evolves towards convergence, in case we use a fixed point algorithm to find $x$, are welcome as well. This problem looks a bit like logistic regression, but I'm not sure about how to further relate the two. thanks!










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$
















    1












    $begingroup$


    please, is there a simple closed-form or approximation to the following fixed-point problem in $x$? $x$ is the value searched for. $m$, $g$ and $N$ are real parameters, all greater than 0,



    beginequation
    x=frac11+m g^-N x
    endequation



    any insights on properties of $x$ are very welcome! In particular, comments about how $x$ evolves towards convergence, in case we use a fixed point algorithm to find $x$, are welcome as well. This problem looks a bit like logistic regression, but I'm not sure about how to further relate the two. thanks!










    share|cite|improve this question











    $endgroup$














      1












      1








      1





      $begingroup$


      please, is there a simple closed-form or approximation to the following fixed-point problem in $x$? $x$ is the value searched for. $m$, $g$ and $N$ are real parameters, all greater than 0,



      beginequation
      x=frac11+m g^-N x
      endequation



      any insights on properties of $x$ are very welcome! In particular, comments about how $x$ evolves towards convergence, in case we use a fixed point algorithm to find $x$, are welcome as well. This problem looks a bit like logistic regression, but I'm not sure about how to further relate the two. thanks!










      share|cite|improve this question











      $endgroup$




      please, is there a simple closed-form or approximation to the following fixed-point problem in $x$? $x$ is the value searched for. $m$, $g$ and $N$ are real parameters, all greater than 0,



      beginequation
      x=frac11+m g^-N x
      endequation



      any insights on properties of $x$ are very welcome! In particular, comments about how $x$ evolves towards convergence, in case we use a fixed point algorithm to find $x$, are welcome as well. This problem looks a bit like logistic regression, but I'm not sure about how to further relate the two. thanks!







      real-analysis roots logistic-regression






      share|cite|improve this question















      share|cite|improve this question













      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question








      edited Dec 20 '18 at 13:12







      Daniel S.

















      asked Dec 20 '18 at 11:23









      Daniel S.Daniel S.

      396




      396




















          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          2












          $begingroup$

          I am afraid that there is no closed form of the solution.



          Without any information about $x$, let us consider the function
          $$f(x)=x left(1+m g^-n xright)-1$$ What we have is $f(0)=-1$ and $f(1)=m g^-n >0$.



          We also have to notice that
          $$f(0)=-1 qquad f'(0)=1+m qquad f''(0)=-2, m, n log (g)$$ So, if $g>1$, $f(0) times f''(0) >0$ and by Darboux theorem , starting with $x_0=0$, Newton method would converge without any overshoot of the solution. As a first iterate, Newton method will give $x_1=frac11+m$ and just continue until convergence using
          $$x_k+1=fracg^n x_k-m n x_k^2 log (g)g^n x_k-m n x_k log (g)+m$$



          Edit



          Assuming that $x$ could be small, we could try to write
          $$y=x left(1+m g^-n xright)$$ Expand as a Taylor series built at $x=0$ to get
          $$y=(m+1) x-a m x^2+fraca^2 m2 x^3 +Oleft(x^4right)$$ where $a=n log(g)$ and use series reversion to get
          $$x=fracym+1+fraca m (m+1)^3y^2+fraca^2m left(3 m-1right)2
          (m+1)^5y^3+Oleft(y^4right)$$
          and set $y=1$ to get
          $$xsimeqfrac1m+1+fraca m (m+1)^3+fraca^2m left(3 m-1right)2
          (m+1)^5$$



          Edit



          Let $t=frac 1m+1$ and get
          $$x=t+a t^2+fraca (3 a-2)2! t^3+fraca^2 (16 a-21)3! t^4+fraca^2(125 a^2-244 a+48 )4! t^5+fraca^3 left(1296 a^2-3355 a+1500right) 5! t^6+Oleft(t^7right)$$






          share|cite|improve this answer











          $endgroup$












          • $begingroup$
            thanks a lot, @ClaudeLeibovici Please, do you have a reference to Darboux-Fourier theorem? Also, does your solution possibly lead to an approximation of the root?
            $endgroup$
            – Daniel S.
            Dec 20 '18 at 15:20











          • $begingroup$
            @DanielS. Here is a link numdam.org/article/NAM_1869_2_8__17_0.pdf
            $endgroup$
            – Claude Leibovici
            Dec 20 '18 at 15:38











          • $begingroup$
            thanks a lot for the reference! so, $x_1$, $x_2$, and so on will be refined approximations of the root, right? maybe closed-form expressions for those quantities are good approximations for the root?
            $endgroup$
            – Daniel S.
            Dec 20 '18 at 16:35










          • $begingroup$
            thanks again, @ClaudeLeibovici
            $endgroup$
            – Daniel S.
            Dec 21 '18 at 11:25










          • $begingroup$
            @DanielS. Let me know how my last stuff works for approximation (run a few cases). Thanks & cheers. :-)
            $endgroup$
            – Claude Leibovici
            Dec 21 '18 at 11:27











          Your Answer





          StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
          return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
          StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
          StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
          );
          );
          , "mathjax-editing");

          StackExchange.ready(function()
          var channelOptions =
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "69"
          ;
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
          createEditor();
          );

          else
          createEditor();

          );

          function createEditor()
          StackExchange.prepareEditor(
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
          convertImagesToLinks: true,
          noModals: true,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: 10,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          imageUploader:
          brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
          contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
          allowUrls: true
          ,
          noCode: true, onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          );



          );













          draft saved

          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function ()
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3047439%2ffix-point-solution-or-approximation-available-logistic-regression%23new-answer', 'question_page');

          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown

























          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes








          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes









          2












          $begingroup$

          I am afraid that there is no closed form of the solution.



          Without any information about $x$, let us consider the function
          $$f(x)=x left(1+m g^-n xright)-1$$ What we have is $f(0)=-1$ and $f(1)=m g^-n >0$.



          We also have to notice that
          $$f(0)=-1 qquad f'(0)=1+m qquad f''(0)=-2, m, n log (g)$$ So, if $g>1$, $f(0) times f''(0) >0$ and by Darboux theorem , starting with $x_0=0$, Newton method would converge without any overshoot of the solution. As a first iterate, Newton method will give $x_1=frac11+m$ and just continue until convergence using
          $$x_k+1=fracg^n x_k-m n x_k^2 log (g)g^n x_k-m n x_k log (g)+m$$



          Edit



          Assuming that $x$ could be small, we could try to write
          $$y=x left(1+m g^-n xright)$$ Expand as a Taylor series built at $x=0$ to get
          $$y=(m+1) x-a m x^2+fraca^2 m2 x^3 +Oleft(x^4right)$$ where $a=n log(g)$ and use series reversion to get
          $$x=fracym+1+fraca m (m+1)^3y^2+fraca^2m left(3 m-1right)2
          (m+1)^5y^3+Oleft(y^4right)$$
          and set $y=1$ to get
          $$xsimeqfrac1m+1+fraca m (m+1)^3+fraca^2m left(3 m-1right)2
          (m+1)^5$$



          Edit



          Let $t=frac 1m+1$ and get
          $$x=t+a t^2+fraca (3 a-2)2! t^3+fraca^2 (16 a-21)3! t^4+fraca^2(125 a^2-244 a+48 )4! t^5+fraca^3 left(1296 a^2-3355 a+1500right) 5! t^6+Oleft(t^7right)$$






          share|cite|improve this answer











          $endgroup$












          • $begingroup$
            thanks a lot, @ClaudeLeibovici Please, do you have a reference to Darboux-Fourier theorem? Also, does your solution possibly lead to an approximation of the root?
            $endgroup$
            – Daniel S.
            Dec 20 '18 at 15:20











          • $begingroup$
            @DanielS. Here is a link numdam.org/article/NAM_1869_2_8__17_0.pdf
            $endgroup$
            – Claude Leibovici
            Dec 20 '18 at 15:38











          • $begingroup$
            thanks a lot for the reference! so, $x_1$, $x_2$, and so on will be refined approximations of the root, right? maybe closed-form expressions for those quantities are good approximations for the root?
            $endgroup$
            – Daniel S.
            Dec 20 '18 at 16:35










          • $begingroup$
            thanks again, @ClaudeLeibovici
            $endgroup$
            – Daniel S.
            Dec 21 '18 at 11:25










          • $begingroup$
            @DanielS. Let me know how my last stuff works for approximation (run a few cases). Thanks & cheers. :-)
            $endgroup$
            – Claude Leibovici
            Dec 21 '18 at 11:27















          2












          $begingroup$

          I am afraid that there is no closed form of the solution.



          Without any information about $x$, let us consider the function
          $$f(x)=x left(1+m g^-n xright)-1$$ What we have is $f(0)=-1$ and $f(1)=m g^-n >0$.



          We also have to notice that
          $$f(0)=-1 qquad f'(0)=1+m qquad f''(0)=-2, m, n log (g)$$ So, if $g>1$, $f(0) times f''(0) >0$ and by Darboux theorem , starting with $x_0=0$, Newton method would converge without any overshoot of the solution. As a first iterate, Newton method will give $x_1=frac11+m$ and just continue until convergence using
          $$x_k+1=fracg^n x_k-m n x_k^2 log (g)g^n x_k-m n x_k log (g)+m$$



          Edit



          Assuming that $x$ could be small, we could try to write
          $$y=x left(1+m g^-n xright)$$ Expand as a Taylor series built at $x=0$ to get
          $$y=(m+1) x-a m x^2+fraca^2 m2 x^3 +Oleft(x^4right)$$ where $a=n log(g)$ and use series reversion to get
          $$x=fracym+1+fraca m (m+1)^3y^2+fraca^2m left(3 m-1right)2
          (m+1)^5y^3+Oleft(y^4right)$$
          and set $y=1$ to get
          $$xsimeqfrac1m+1+fraca m (m+1)^3+fraca^2m left(3 m-1right)2
          (m+1)^5$$



          Edit



          Let $t=frac 1m+1$ and get
          $$x=t+a t^2+fraca (3 a-2)2! t^3+fraca^2 (16 a-21)3! t^4+fraca^2(125 a^2-244 a+48 )4! t^5+fraca^3 left(1296 a^2-3355 a+1500right) 5! t^6+Oleft(t^7right)$$






          share|cite|improve this answer











          $endgroup$












          • $begingroup$
            thanks a lot, @ClaudeLeibovici Please, do you have a reference to Darboux-Fourier theorem? Also, does your solution possibly lead to an approximation of the root?
            $endgroup$
            – Daniel S.
            Dec 20 '18 at 15:20











          • $begingroup$
            @DanielS. Here is a link numdam.org/article/NAM_1869_2_8__17_0.pdf
            $endgroup$
            – Claude Leibovici
            Dec 20 '18 at 15:38











          • $begingroup$
            thanks a lot for the reference! so, $x_1$, $x_2$, and so on will be refined approximations of the root, right? maybe closed-form expressions for those quantities are good approximations for the root?
            $endgroup$
            – Daniel S.
            Dec 20 '18 at 16:35










          • $begingroup$
            thanks again, @ClaudeLeibovici
            $endgroup$
            – Daniel S.
            Dec 21 '18 at 11:25










          • $begingroup$
            @DanielS. Let me know how my last stuff works for approximation (run a few cases). Thanks & cheers. :-)
            $endgroup$
            – Claude Leibovici
            Dec 21 '18 at 11:27













          2












          2








          2





          $begingroup$

          I am afraid that there is no closed form of the solution.



          Without any information about $x$, let us consider the function
          $$f(x)=x left(1+m g^-n xright)-1$$ What we have is $f(0)=-1$ and $f(1)=m g^-n >0$.



          We also have to notice that
          $$f(0)=-1 qquad f'(0)=1+m qquad f''(0)=-2, m, n log (g)$$ So, if $g>1$, $f(0) times f''(0) >0$ and by Darboux theorem , starting with $x_0=0$, Newton method would converge without any overshoot of the solution. As a first iterate, Newton method will give $x_1=frac11+m$ and just continue until convergence using
          $$x_k+1=fracg^n x_k-m n x_k^2 log (g)g^n x_k-m n x_k log (g)+m$$



          Edit



          Assuming that $x$ could be small, we could try to write
          $$y=x left(1+m g^-n xright)$$ Expand as a Taylor series built at $x=0$ to get
          $$y=(m+1) x-a m x^2+fraca^2 m2 x^3 +Oleft(x^4right)$$ where $a=n log(g)$ and use series reversion to get
          $$x=fracym+1+fraca m (m+1)^3y^2+fraca^2m left(3 m-1right)2
          (m+1)^5y^3+Oleft(y^4right)$$
          and set $y=1$ to get
          $$xsimeqfrac1m+1+fraca m (m+1)^3+fraca^2m left(3 m-1right)2
          (m+1)^5$$



          Edit



          Let $t=frac 1m+1$ and get
          $$x=t+a t^2+fraca (3 a-2)2! t^3+fraca^2 (16 a-21)3! t^4+fraca^2(125 a^2-244 a+48 )4! t^5+fraca^3 left(1296 a^2-3355 a+1500right) 5! t^6+Oleft(t^7right)$$






          share|cite|improve this answer











          $endgroup$



          I am afraid that there is no closed form of the solution.



          Without any information about $x$, let us consider the function
          $$f(x)=x left(1+m g^-n xright)-1$$ What we have is $f(0)=-1$ and $f(1)=m g^-n >0$.



          We also have to notice that
          $$f(0)=-1 qquad f'(0)=1+m qquad f''(0)=-2, m, n log (g)$$ So, if $g>1$, $f(0) times f''(0) >0$ and by Darboux theorem , starting with $x_0=0$, Newton method would converge without any overshoot of the solution. As a first iterate, Newton method will give $x_1=frac11+m$ and just continue until convergence using
          $$x_k+1=fracg^n x_k-m n x_k^2 log (g)g^n x_k-m n x_k log (g)+m$$



          Edit



          Assuming that $x$ could be small, we could try to write
          $$y=x left(1+m g^-n xright)$$ Expand as a Taylor series built at $x=0$ to get
          $$y=(m+1) x-a m x^2+fraca^2 m2 x^3 +Oleft(x^4right)$$ where $a=n log(g)$ and use series reversion to get
          $$x=fracym+1+fraca m (m+1)^3y^2+fraca^2m left(3 m-1right)2
          (m+1)^5y^3+Oleft(y^4right)$$
          and set $y=1$ to get
          $$xsimeqfrac1m+1+fraca m (m+1)^3+fraca^2m left(3 m-1right)2
          (m+1)^5$$



          Edit



          Let $t=frac 1m+1$ and get
          $$x=t+a t^2+fraca (3 a-2)2! t^3+fraca^2 (16 a-21)3! t^4+fraca^2(125 a^2-244 a+48 )4! t^5+fraca^3 left(1296 a^2-3355 a+1500right) 5! t^6+Oleft(t^7right)$$







          share|cite|improve this answer














          share|cite|improve this answer



          share|cite|improve this answer








          edited Mar 23 at 4:31

























          answered Dec 20 '18 at 14:52









          Claude LeiboviciClaude Leibovici

          125k1158135




          125k1158135











          • $begingroup$
            thanks a lot, @ClaudeLeibovici Please, do you have a reference to Darboux-Fourier theorem? Also, does your solution possibly lead to an approximation of the root?
            $endgroup$
            – Daniel S.
            Dec 20 '18 at 15:20











          • $begingroup$
            @DanielS. Here is a link numdam.org/article/NAM_1869_2_8__17_0.pdf
            $endgroup$
            – Claude Leibovici
            Dec 20 '18 at 15:38











          • $begingroup$
            thanks a lot for the reference! so, $x_1$, $x_2$, and so on will be refined approximations of the root, right? maybe closed-form expressions for those quantities are good approximations for the root?
            $endgroup$
            – Daniel S.
            Dec 20 '18 at 16:35










          • $begingroup$
            thanks again, @ClaudeLeibovici
            $endgroup$
            – Daniel S.
            Dec 21 '18 at 11:25










          • $begingroup$
            @DanielS. Let me know how my last stuff works for approximation (run a few cases). Thanks & cheers. :-)
            $endgroup$
            – Claude Leibovici
            Dec 21 '18 at 11:27
















          • $begingroup$
            thanks a lot, @ClaudeLeibovici Please, do you have a reference to Darboux-Fourier theorem? Also, does your solution possibly lead to an approximation of the root?
            $endgroup$
            – Daniel S.
            Dec 20 '18 at 15:20











          • $begingroup$
            @DanielS. Here is a link numdam.org/article/NAM_1869_2_8__17_0.pdf
            $endgroup$
            – Claude Leibovici
            Dec 20 '18 at 15:38











          • $begingroup$
            thanks a lot for the reference! so, $x_1$, $x_2$, and so on will be refined approximations of the root, right? maybe closed-form expressions for those quantities are good approximations for the root?
            $endgroup$
            – Daniel S.
            Dec 20 '18 at 16:35










          • $begingroup$
            thanks again, @ClaudeLeibovici
            $endgroup$
            – Daniel S.
            Dec 21 '18 at 11:25










          • $begingroup$
            @DanielS. Let me know how my last stuff works for approximation (run a few cases). Thanks & cheers. :-)
            $endgroup$
            – Claude Leibovici
            Dec 21 '18 at 11:27















          $begingroup$
          thanks a lot, @ClaudeLeibovici Please, do you have a reference to Darboux-Fourier theorem? Also, does your solution possibly lead to an approximation of the root?
          $endgroup$
          – Daniel S.
          Dec 20 '18 at 15:20





          $begingroup$
          thanks a lot, @ClaudeLeibovici Please, do you have a reference to Darboux-Fourier theorem? Also, does your solution possibly lead to an approximation of the root?
          $endgroup$
          – Daniel S.
          Dec 20 '18 at 15:20













          $begingroup$
          @DanielS. Here is a link numdam.org/article/NAM_1869_2_8__17_0.pdf
          $endgroup$
          – Claude Leibovici
          Dec 20 '18 at 15:38





          $begingroup$
          @DanielS. Here is a link numdam.org/article/NAM_1869_2_8__17_0.pdf
          $endgroup$
          – Claude Leibovici
          Dec 20 '18 at 15:38













          $begingroup$
          thanks a lot for the reference! so, $x_1$, $x_2$, and so on will be refined approximations of the root, right? maybe closed-form expressions for those quantities are good approximations for the root?
          $endgroup$
          – Daniel S.
          Dec 20 '18 at 16:35




          $begingroup$
          thanks a lot for the reference! so, $x_1$, $x_2$, and so on will be refined approximations of the root, right? maybe closed-form expressions for those quantities are good approximations for the root?
          $endgroup$
          – Daniel S.
          Dec 20 '18 at 16:35












          $begingroup$
          thanks again, @ClaudeLeibovici
          $endgroup$
          – Daniel S.
          Dec 21 '18 at 11:25




          $begingroup$
          thanks again, @ClaudeLeibovici
          $endgroup$
          – Daniel S.
          Dec 21 '18 at 11:25












          $begingroup$
          @DanielS. Let me know how my last stuff works for approximation (run a few cases). Thanks & cheers. :-)
          $endgroup$
          – Claude Leibovici
          Dec 21 '18 at 11:27




          $begingroup$
          @DanielS. Let me know how my last stuff works for approximation (run a few cases). Thanks & cheers. :-)
          $endgroup$
          – Claude Leibovici
          Dec 21 '18 at 11:27

















          draft saved

          draft discarded
















































          Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

          But avoid


          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

          Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




          draft saved


          draft discarded














          StackExchange.ready(
          function ()
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3047439%2ffix-point-solution-or-approximation-available-logistic-regression%23new-answer', 'question_page');

          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown





















































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown

































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown







          Popular posts from this blog

          Lowndes Grove History Architecture References Navigation menu32°48′6″N 79°57′58″W / 32.80167°N 79.96611°W / 32.80167; -79.9661132°48′6″N 79°57′58″W / 32.80167°N 79.96611°W / 32.80167; -79.9661178002500"National Register Information System"Historic houses of South Carolina"Lowndes Grove""+32° 48' 6.00", −79° 57' 58.00""Lowndes Grove, Charleston County (260 St. Margaret St., Charleston)""Lowndes Grove"The Charleston ExpositionIt Happened in South Carolina"Lowndes Grove (House), Saint Margaret Street & Sixth Avenue, Charleston, Charleston County, SC(Photographs)"Plantations of the Carolina Low Countrye

          random experiment with two different functions on unit interval Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara Planned maintenance scheduled April 23, 2019 at 00:00UTC (8:00pm US/Eastern)Random variable and probability space notionsRandom Walk with EdgesFinding functions where the increase over a random interval is Poisson distributedNumber of days until dayCan an observed event in fact be of zero probability?Unit random processmodels of coins and uniform distributionHow to get the number of successes given $n$ trials , probability $P$ and a random variable $X$Absorbing Markov chain in a computer. Is “almost every” turned into always convergence in computer executions?Stopped random walk is not uniformly integrable

          How should I support this large drywall patch? Planned maintenance scheduled April 23, 2019 at 00:00UTC (8:00pm US/Eastern) Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara Unicorn Meta Zoo #1: Why another podcast?How do I cover large gaps in drywall?How do I keep drywall around a patch from crumbling?Can I glue a second layer of drywall?How to patch long strip on drywall?Large drywall patch: how to avoid bulging seams?Drywall Mesh Patch vs. Bulge? To remove or not to remove?How to fix this drywall job?Prep drywall before backsplashWhat's the best way to fix this horrible drywall patch job?Drywall patching using 3M Patch Plus Primer