PTIJ: in nusach Yodeya, where in the t'filah do we acknowledge the fourth patriarch? [closed] The 2019 Stack Overflow Developer Survey Results Are InParashat Metzora+HagadolPesach/PassoverPTIJ: What is Nusach Yodeya?Who is the fourth father?Where are the waters of Yodeya?PTIJ Where is there a chiyuv kavod?PTIJ: Ruach - mi yodeya?PTIJ: Fibonacci Numbers - Mi Yodeya?PTIJ: Infinity - Mi Yodeya?PTIJ: Where can I buy good wine?PTIJ: Where will all the Israeli chicken coops go?PTIJ: What is Nusach Yodeya?PTIJ: where are Tzafra and Urta located?
What is the steepest angle that a canal can be traversable without locks?
"To split hairs" vs "To be pedantic"
What is this 4-propeller plane?
Output the Arecibo Message
Dual Citizen. Exited the US on Italian passport recently
Is domain driven design an anti-SQL pattern?
Why Did Howard Stark Use All The Vibranium They Had On A Prototype Shield?
JSON.serialize: is it possible to suppress null values of a map?
How to manage monthly salary
Are there any other methods to apply to solving simultaneous equations?
Is it possible for the two major parties in the UK to form a coalition with each other instead of a much smaller party?
Does duplicating a spell with Wish count as casting that spell?
If a poisoned arrow's piercing damage is reduced to 0, do you still get poisoned?
Patience, young "Padovan"
How can I create a character who can assume the widest possible range of creature sizes?
Is "plugging out" electronic devices an American expression?
What does Linus Torvalds mean when he says that Git "never ever" tracks a file?
Does it makes sense to buy a new cycle to learn riding?
Inflated grade on resume at previous job, might former employer tell new employer?
How long do I have to send payment?
Pristine Bit Checking
Realistic Alternatives to Dust: What Else Could Feed a Plankton Bloom?
How to answer pointed "are you quitting" questioning when I don't want them to suspect
Could JWST stay at L2 "forever"?
PTIJ: in nusach Yodeya, where in the t'filah do we acknowledge the fourth patriarch? [closed]
The 2019 Stack Overflow Developer Survey Results Are InParashat Metzora+HagadolPesach/PassoverPTIJ: What is Nusach Yodeya?Who is the fourth father?Where are the waters of Yodeya?PTIJ Where is there a chiyuv kavod?PTIJ: Ruach - mi yodeya?PTIJ: Fibonacci Numbers - Mi Yodeya?PTIJ: Infinity - Mi Yodeya?PTIJ: Where can I buy good wine?PTIJ: Where will all the Israeli chicken coops go?PTIJ: What is Nusach Yodeya?PTIJ: where are Tzafra and Urta located?
The first blessing in the Amidah is, of course, avot, where we acknowledge the patriarchs. What is the version of this text in nusach Yodeya? Where do we acknowledge our additional patriarch? Do we say elokei Avraham, elokei Yitzchak, elokei Yaakov, elokei Yitzchak, to preserve the order? Or is that confusing and instead we say ...elokei Yitzchakim? Or maybe we add elokei Yitzchak Moshe? Or do we not modify this passage, and we instead acknowledge the last patriarch somewhere else?
I've been unable to obtain a Yodeyan siddur, but I'm hoping that one of you can tell me what the correct practice is.
(I'm aware that there are other places in davening where we list the patriarchs. I'm focusing on this very prominent one, but a general answer that applies to all of them, if such exists, would be great.)
This question is Purim Torah and is not intended to be taken completely seriously. See the Purim Torah policy.
purim-torah-in-jest
closed as off-topic by msh210♦ Mar 23 at 22:19
This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:
- "Purim Torah questions are on-topic only once a year, and will be closed after Purim. For details, see: Purim Torah policy" – msh210
add a comment |
The first blessing in the Amidah is, of course, avot, where we acknowledge the patriarchs. What is the version of this text in nusach Yodeya? Where do we acknowledge our additional patriarch? Do we say elokei Avraham, elokei Yitzchak, elokei Yaakov, elokei Yitzchak, to preserve the order? Or is that confusing and instead we say ...elokei Yitzchakim? Or maybe we add elokei Yitzchak Moshe? Or do we not modify this passage, and we instead acknowledge the last patriarch somewhere else?
I've been unable to obtain a Yodeyan siddur, but I'm hoping that one of you can tell me what the correct practice is.
(I'm aware that there are other places in davening where we list the patriarchs. I'm focusing on this very prominent one, but a general answer that applies to all of them, if such exists, would be great.)
This question is Purim Torah and is not intended to be taken completely seriously. See the Purim Torah policy.
purim-torah-in-jest
closed as off-topic by msh210♦ Mar 23 at 22:19
This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:
- "Purim Torah questions are on-topic only once a year, and will be closed after Purim. For details, see: Purim Torah policy" – msh210
Asked with hours to spare! (Why oh why did I only think of this now?)
– Monica Cellio♦
Mar 22 at 21:07
2
"Your title shall be Moderator. No longer shall you be called Patriarch." Shabbat Shalom!
– Isaac Moses♦
Mar 22 at 21:10
Except that "no longer called" didn't exactly happen in that other case, so why should we assume it here? Shabbat shalom!
– Monica Cellio♦
Mar 22 at 21:11
add a comment |
The first blessing in the Amidah is, of course, avot, where we acknowledge the patriarchs. What is the version of this text in nusach Yodeya? Where do we acknowledge our additional patriarch? Do we say elokei Avraham, elokei Yitzchak, elokei Yaakov, elokei Yitzchak, to preserve the order? Or is that confusing and instead we say ...elokei Yitzchakim? Or maybe we add elokei Yitzchak Moshe? Or do we not modify this passage, and we instead acknowledge the last patriarch somewhere else?
I've been unable to obtain a Yodeyan siddur, but I'm hoping that one of you can tell me what the correct practice is.
(I'm aware that there are other places in davening where we list the patriarchs. I'm focusing on this very prominent one, but a general answer that applies to all of them, if such exists, would be great.)
This question is Purim Torah and is not intended to be taken completely seriously. See the Purim Torah policy.
purim-torah-in-jest
The first blessing in the Amidah is, of course, avot, where we acknowledge the patriarchs. What is the version of this text in nusach Yodeya? Where do we acknowledge our additional patriarch? Do we say elokei Avraham, elokei Yitzchak, elokei Yaakov, elokei Yitzchak, to preserve the order? Or is that confusing and instead we say ...elokei Yitzchakim? Or maybe we add elokei Yitzchak Moshe? Or do we not modify this passage, and we instead acknowledge the last patriarch somewhere else?
I've been unable to obtain a Yodeyan siddur, but I'm hoping that one of you can tell me what the correct practice is.
(I'm aware that there are other places in davening where we list the patriarchs. I'm focusing on this very prominent one, but a general answer that applies to all of them, if such exists, would be great.)
This question is Purim Torah and is not intended to be taken completely seriously. See the Purim Torah policy.
purim-torah-in-jest
purim-torah-in-jest
asked Mar 22 at 21:03
Monica Cellio♦Monica Cellio
37.9k582264
37.9k582264
closed as off-topic by msh210♦ Mar 23 at 22:19
This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:
- "Purim Torah questions are on-topic only once a year, and will be closed after Purim. For details, see: Purim Torah policy" – msh210
closed as off-topic by msh210♦ Mar 23 at 22:19
This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:
- "Purim Torah questions are on-topic only once a year, and will be closed after Purim. For details, see: Purim Torah policy" – msh210
Asked with hours to spare! (Why oh why did I only think of this now?)
– Monica Cellio♦
Mar 22 at 21:07
2
"Your title shall be Moderator. No longer shall you be called Patriarch." Shabbat Shalom!
– Isaac Moses♦
Mar 22 at 21:10
Except that "no longer called" didn't exactly happen in that other case, so why should we assume it here? Shabbat shalom!
– Monica Cellio♦
Mar 22 at 21:11
add a comment |
Asked with hours to spare! (Why oh why did I only think of this now?)
– Monica Cellio♦
Mar 22 at 21:07
2
"Your title shall be Moderator. No longer shall you be called Patriarch." Shabbat Shalom!
– Isaac Moses♦
Mar 22 at 21:10
Except that "no longer called" didn't exactly happen in that other case, so why should we assume it here? Shabbat shalom!
– Monica Cellio♦
Mar 22 at 21:11
Asked with hours to spare! (Why oh why did I only think of this now?)
– Monica Cellio♦
Mar 22 at 21:07
Asked with hours to spare! (Why oh why did I only think of this now?)
– Monica Cellio♦
Mar 22 at 21:07
2
2
"Your title shall be Moderator. No longer shall you be called Patriarch." Shabbat Shalom!
– Isaac Moses♦
Mar 22 at 21:10
"Your title shall be Moderator. No longer shall you be called Patriarch." Shabbat Shalom!
– Isaac Moses♦
Mar 22 at 21:10
Except that "no longer called" didn't exactly happen in that other case, so why should we assume it here? Shabbat shalom!
– Monica Cellio♦
Mar 22 at 21:11
Except that "no longer called" didn't exactly happen in that other case, so why should we assume it here? Shabbat shalom!
– Monica Cellio♦
Mar 22 at 21:11
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
Did you ever wonder why it's "Elohei Avraham Elohei Yitzchak V elohei Yaakov"? Why don't we say Velohei both times like how Vav is used repeatedly in Tanakh (eg. Gen 25 ויאכל וישת ויקם וילך ויבז)?
It's because we specifically want to connect Yitzchak with a following name of Hashem. What's the connection? Hashem spelled backwards in Hebrew is Moshe. The hint was there all along, since God knew about Mi Yodeya long ago. He even hinted to it many times in Tanakh.
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
Did you ever wonder why it's "Elohei Avraham Elohei Yitzchak V elohei Yaakov"? Why don't we say Velohei both times like how Vav is used repeatedly in Tanakh (eg. Gen 25 ויאכל וישת ויקם וילך ויבז)?
It's because we specifically want to connect Yitzchak with a following name of Hashem. What's the connection? Hashem spelled backwards in Hebrew is Moshe. The hint was there all along, since God knew about Mi Yodeya long ago. He even hinted to it many times in Tanakh.
add a comment |
Did you ever wonder why it's "Elohei Avraham Elohei Yitzchak V elohei Yaakov"? Why don't we say Velohei both times like how Vav is used repeatedly in Tanakh (eg. Gen 25 ויאכל וישת ויקם וילך ויבז)?
It's because we specifically want to connect Yitzchak with a following name of Hashem. What's the connection? Hashem spelled backwards in Hebrew is Moshe. The hint was there all along, since God knew about Mi Yodeya long ago. He even hinted to it many times in Tanakh.
add a comment |
Did you ever wonder why it's "Elohei Avraham Elohei Yitzchak V elohei Yaakov"? Why don't we say Velohei both times like how Vav is used repeatedly in Tanakh (eg. Gen 25 ויאכל וישת ויקם וילך ויבז)?
It's because we specifically want to connect Yitzchak with a following name of Hashem. What's the connection? Hashem spelled backwards in Hebrew is Moshe. The hint was there all along, since God knew about Mi Yodeya long ago. He even hinted to it many times in Tanakh.
Did you ever wonder why it's "Elohei Avraham Elohei Yitzchak V elohei Yaakov"? Why don't we say Velohei both times like how Vav is used repeatedly in Tanakh (eg. Gen 25 ויאכל וישת ויקם וילך ויבז)?
It's because we specifically want to connect Yitzchak with a following name of Hashem. What's the connection? Hashem spelled backwards in Hebrew is Moshe. The hint was there all along, since God knew about Mi Yodeya long ago. He even hinted to it many times in Tanakh.
answered Mar 22 at 21:13
Double AA♦Double AA
78.9k6193419
78.9k6193419
add a comment |
add a comment |
Asked with hours to spare! (Why oh why did I only think of this now?)
– Monica Cellio♦
Mar 22 at 21:07
2
"Your title shall be Moderator. No longer shall you be called Patriarch." Shabbat Shalom!
– Isaac Moses♦
Mar 22 at 21:10
Except that "no longer called" didn't exactly happen in that other case, so why should we assume it here? Shabbat shalom!
– Monica Cellio♦
Mar 22 at 21:11