What is meant by the absolute convergence of the infinite product $prodlimits_n=1^infty frac 1 1+a_n$? The 2019 Stack Overflow Developer Survey Results Are InProof of a theorem of Cauchy's on the convergence of an infinite productsufficiency and necessity of convergence of $sum a_n$ wrt convergence of $prod (1 + a_n)$absolute convergence of $sum _n=1^infty a_n$ imply?Why is the convergence absolute?What is the definition of the absolute convergence of an infinite product $(1+a_1)(1+a_2)(1+a_3)cdots$?If $prodlimits_n(1+a_n)$ converges, does $sumlimits_nfraca_n1+a_n$ converge?Does $a_0+sum limits_n=1^infty(a_n+a_-n)=sum limits_n=-infty^+inftya_n$?Equivalence of convergence of a series and convergence of an infinite productAbsolute convergence of $sum_n=0^inftya_nimpliessum_n=0^inftya_n^2$ is absolute convergent tooConvergence of $sumlimits_n=0^infty (1-|a_n|)$

How to create dashed lines/arrows in Illustrator

Landlord wants to switch my lease to a "Land contract" to "get back at the city"

What is the best strategy for white in this position?

Why do some words that are not inflected have an umlaut?

Does it makes sense to buy a new cycle to learn riding?

Is an up-to-date browser secure on an out-of-date OS?

How was Skylab's orbit inclination chosen?

What is the steepest angle that a canal can be traversable without locks?

Should I write numbers in words or as numerals when there are multiple next to each other?

How to change the limits of integration

Is this food a bread or a loaf?

Should I use my personal or workplace e-mail when registering to external websites for work purpose?

How is radar separation assured between primary and secondary targets?

What is the use of option -o in the useradd command?

Falsification in Math vs Science

Realistic Alternatives to Dust: What Else Could Feed a Plankton Bloom?

The difference between dialogue marks

What does Linus Torvalds mean when he says that Git "never ever" tracks a file?

What does "rabbited" mean/imply in this sentence?

How to answer pointed "are you quitting" questioning when I don't want them to suspect

Geography at the pixel level

Adding labels to a table: columns and rows

aging parents with no investments

Understanding the implication of what "well-defined" means for the operation in quotient group



What is meant by the absolute convergence of the infinite product $prodlimits_n=1^infty frac 1 1+a_n$?



The 2019 Stack Overflow Developer Survey Results Are InProof of a theorem of Cauchy's on the convergence of an infinite productsufficiency and necessity of convergence of $sum a_n$ wrt convergence of $prod (1 + a_n)$absolute convergence of $sum _n=1^infty a_n$ imply?Why is the convergence absolute?What is the definition of the absolute convergence of an infinite product $(1+a_1)(1+a_2)(1+a_3)cdots$?If $prodlimits_n(1+a_n)$ converges, does $sumlimits_nfraca_n1+a_n$ converge?Does $a_0+sum limits_n=1^infty(a_n+a_-n)=sum limits_n=-infty^+inftya_n$?Equivalence of convergence of a series and convergence of an infinite productAbsolute convergence of $sum_n=0^inftya_nimpliessum_n=0^inftya_n^2$ is absolute convergent tooConvergence of $sumlimits_n=0^infty (1-|a_n|)$










3












$begingroup$


Let $a_n $ be a sequence of real numbers. Consider the infinite product





$$prodlimits_n=1^infty frac 1 1+a_n.$$





When do we say that the above infinite product is absolutely convergent? In the notion of an infinite series I know that a series $sumlimits_n=1^infty a_n$ is absolutely convergent if $sumlimits_n=1^infty |a_n|$ is convergent. For the case of infinite series I also know that absolute convergence implies convergence. Do all these results hold for infinite product too? Please help me in this regard.



Thank you so much for your valuable time.










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$
















    3












    $begingroup$


    Let $a_n $ be a sequence of real numbers. Consider the infinite product





    $$prodlimits_n=1^infty frac 1 1+a_n.$$





    When do we say that the above infinite product is absolutely convergent? In the notion of an infinite series I know that a series $sumlimits_n=1^infty a_n$ is absolutely convergent if $sumlimits_n=1^infty |a_n|$ is convergent. For the case of infinite series I also know that absolute convergence implies convergence. Do all these results hold for infinite product too? Please help me in this regard.



    Thank you so much for your valuable time.










    share|cite|improve this question









    $endgroup$














      3












      3








      3





      $begingroup$


      Let $a_n $ be a sequence of real numbers. Consider the infinite product





      $$prodlimits_n=1^infty frac 1 1+a_n.$$





      When do we say that the above infinite product is absolutely convergent? In the notion of an infinite series I know that a series $sumlimits_n=1^infty a_n$ is absolutely convergent if $sumlimits_n=1^infty |a_n|$ is convergent. For the case of infinite series I also know that absolute convergence implies convergence. Do all these results hold for infinite product too? Please help me in this regard.



      Thank you so much for your valuable time.










      share|cite|improve this question









      $endgroup$




      Let $a_n $ be a sequence of real numbers. Consider the infinite product





      $$prodlimits_n=1^infty frac 1 1+a_n.$$





      When do we say that the above infinite product is absolutely convergent? In the notion of an infinite series I know that a series $sumlimits_n=1^infty a_n$ is absolutely convergent if $sumlimits_n=1^infty |a_n|$ is convergent. For the case of infinite series I also know that absolute convergence implies convergence. Do all these results hold for infinite product too? Please help me in this regard.



      Thank you so much for your valuable time.







      sequences-and-series convergence






      share|cite|improve this question













      share|cite|improve this question











      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question










      asked Mar 23 at 5:46









      math maniac.math maniac.

      1647




      1647




















          3 Answers
          3






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          1












          $begingroup$

          For convergence of the product, we need $limlimits_ntoinftya_n=0$. That means that there is an $N$ so that for $nge N$, $|a_n|lt1$. Then,
          $$
          logleft(prod_n=N^inftyfrac11+a_nright)=-sum_n=N^inftylog(1+a_n)
          $$

          Thus, the convergence of the product is the same as the convergence of the sum of the logs. Absolute convergence of the product is the same as absolute convergence of the sum of the logarithms.



          Therefore, absolute convergence of the product implies convergence of the product.






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$




















            0












            $begingroup$

            Definition

            The infinite product $prod (1+b_j)$ is said to converge absolutely iff the infinite series $sum b_j$ converges absolutely.



            (Any text that discusses infinite products should include this definition. And it should include the theorem that if an infinite product converges absolutely, then it converges.)



            Your case:
            $$
            prodfrac11+a_j = prod (1+b_j),
            $$

            where



            $$
            b_j = 1 - frac11+a_j = fraca_j1+a_j
            $$



            So the criterion becomes:



            $$
            sumleft|fraca_j1+a_jright| < +infty
            $$

            As noted, this is equivalent to $sum |a_j| < +infty$.






            share|cite|improve this answer









            $endgroup$




















              -1












              $begingroup$

              If we define $$S=prod_n=1^inftyleft|1over 1+a_nright|$$then we have $$ln S=sum_n=1^inftyln left|1over 1+a_nright|$$Since boundedness of $S>0$ is equivalent to the boundedness of $ln S$, then any criteria on the absolute convergence of product of $mathbfleft1over 1+a_nright$ is equivalent to that for the convergence of the sum of $mathbflnleft$.






              share|cite|improve this answer











              $endgroup$












              • $begingroup$
                I'd say $sum ln frac11+$ instead otherwise you'll have some trouble with $a_n=-2$
                $endgroup$
                – reuns
                Mar 23 at 7:02










              • $begingroup$
                @reuns suppose it is given that $sum ln frac 1 a_n$ is convergent. Does that imply $sum ln frac 1 1+a_n$ is also convergent?
                $endgroup$
                – math maniac.
                Mar 23 at 7:08











              • $begingroup$
                If $a_n=-2$ constantly, then by substitution $S=1$, but the product (itself, not the absolute value) oscillates between $-1$ and $1$, i.e. despite absolute convergence, the product doesn't converge to any real number (an odd thing!). Also $sumln$ is an infimum to $sunln$.
                $endgroup$
                – Mostafa Ayaz
                Mar 23 at 7:08











              • $begingroup$
                Absolute convergence of the product doesn't mean $prod_n |frac11+a_n|$ converges in $BbbC^*$ but that $prod_n frac11+a_n$ converges in $BbbC^*$ independently of the ordering. For this we look at the convergence of $sum_n f(a_n)$ with $f(x) = ln(1+|x|)$ or $f(x) = |x|$ with just a subtlety if $a_n=-1$ for some $n$
                $endgroup$
                – reuns
                Mar 23 at 7:11











              • $begingroup$
                @reuns, yes it does. Check out en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Absolute_convergence
                $endgroup$
                – Mostafa Ayaz
                Mar 23 at 7:17











              Your Answer





              StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
              return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
              StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
              StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
              );
              );
              , "mathjax-editing");

              StackExchange.ready(function()
              var channelOptions =
              tags: "".split(" "),
              id: "69"
              ;
              initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

              StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
              // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
              if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
              StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
              createEditor();
              );

              else
              createEditor();

              );

              function createEditor()
              StackExchange.prepareEditor(
              heartbeatType: 'answer',
              autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
              convertImagesToLinks: true,
              noModals: true,
              showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
              reputationToPostImages: 10,
              bindNavPrevention: true,
              postfix: "",
              imageUploader:
              brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
              contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
              allowUrls: true
              ,
              noCode: true, onDemand: true,
              discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
              ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
              );



              );













              draft saved

              draft discarded


















              StackExchange.ready(
              function ()
              StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3158993%2fwhat-is-meant-by-the-absolute-convergence-of-the-infinite-product-prod-limits%23new-answer', 'question_page');

              );

              Post as a guest















              Required, but never shown

























              3 Answers
              3






              active

              oldest

              votes








              3 Answers
              3






              active

              oldest

              votes









              active

              oldest

              votes






              active

              oldest

              votes









              1












              $begingroup$

              For convergence of the product, we need $limlimits_ntoinftya_n=0$. That means that there is an $N$ so that for $nge N$, $|a_n|lt1$. Then,
              $$
              logleft(prod_n=N^inftyfrac11+a_nright)=-sum_n=N^inftylog(1+a_n)
              $$

              Thus, the convergence of the product is the same as the convergence of the sum of the logs. Absolute convergence of the product is the same as absolute convergence of the sum of the logarithms.



              Therefore, absolute convergence of the product implies convergence of the product.






              share|cite|improve this answer









              $endgroup$

















                1












                $begingroup$

                For convergence of the product, we need $limlimits_ntoinftya_n=0$. That means that there is an $N$ so that for $nge N$, $|a_n|lt1$. Then,
                $$
                logleft(prod_n=N^inftyfrac11+a_nright)=-sum_n=N^inftylog(1+a_n)
                $$

                Thus, the convergence of the product is the same as the convergence of the sum of the logs. Absolute convergence of the product is the same as absolute convergence of the sum of the logarithms.



                Therefore, absolute convergence of the product implies convergence of the product.






                share|cite|improve this answer









                $endgroup$















                  1












                  1








                  1





                  $begingroup$

                  For convergence of the product, we need $limlimits_ntoinftya_n=0$. That means that there is an $N$ so that for $nge N$, $|a_n|lt1$. Then,
                  $$
                  logleft(prod_n=N^inftyfrac11+a_nright)=-sum_n=N^inftylog(1+a_n)
                  $$

                  Thus, the convergence of the product is the same as the convergence of the sum of the logs. Absolute convergence of the product is the same as absolute convergence of the sum of the logarithms.



                  Therefore, absolute convergence of the product implies convergence of the product.






                  share|cite|improve this answer









                  $endgroup$



                  For convergence of the product, we need $limlimits_ntoinftya_n=0$. That means that there is an $N$ so that for $nge N$, $|a_n|lt1$. Then,
                  $$
                  logleft(prod_n=N^inftyfrac11+a_nright)=-sum_n=N^inftylog(1+a_n)
                  $$

                  Thus, the convergence of the product is the same as the convergence of the sum of the logs. Absolute convergence of the product is the same as absolute convergence of the sum of the logarithms.



                  Therefore, absolute convergence of the product implies convergence of the product.







                  share|cite|improve this answer












                  share|cite|improve this answer



                  share|cite|improve this answer










                  answered Mar 23 at 7:59









                  robjohnrobjohn

                  270k27313642




                  270k27313642





















                      0












                      $begingroup$

                      Definition

                      The infinite product $prod (1+b_j)$ is said to converge absolutely iff the infinite series $sum b_j$ converges absolutely.



                      (Any text that discusses infinite products should include this definition. And it should include the theorem that if an infinite product converges absolutely, then it converges.)



                      Your case:
                      $$
                      prodfrac11+a_j = prod (1+b_j),
                      $$

                      where



                      $$
                      b_j = 1 - frac11+a_j = fraca_j1+a_j
                      $$



                      So the criterion becomes:



                      $$
                      sumleft|fraca_j1+a_jright| < +infty
                      $$

                      As noted, this is equivalent to $sum |a_j| < +infty$.






                      share|cite|improve this answer









                      $endgroup$

















                        0












                        $begingroup$

                        Definition

                        The infinite product $prod (1+b_j)$ is said to converge absolutely iff the infinite series $sum b_j$ converges absolutely.



                        (Any text that discusses infinite products should include this definition. And it should include the theorem that if an infinite product converges absolutely, then it converges.)



                        Your case:
                        $$
                        prodfrac11+a_j = prod (1+b_j),
                        $$

                        where



                        $$
                        b_j = 1 - frac11+a_j = fraca_j1+a_j
                        $$



                        So the criterion becomes:



                        $$
                        sumleft|fraca_j1+a_jright| < +infty
                        $$

                        As noted, this is equivalent to $sum |a_j| < +infty$.






                        share|cite|improve this answer









                        $endgroup$















                          0












                          0








                          0





                          $begingroup$

                          Definition

                          The infinite product $prod (1+b_j)$ is said to converge absolutely iff the infinite series $sum b_j$ converges absolutely.



                          (Any text that discusses infinite products should include this definition. And it should include the theorem that if an infinite product converges absolutely, then it converges.)



                          Your case:
                          $$
                          prodfrac11+a_j = prod (1+b_j),
                          $$

                          where



                          $$
                          b_j = 1 - frac11+a_j = fraca_j1+a_j
                          $$



                          So the criterion becomes:



                          $$
                          sumleft|fraca_j1+a_jright| < +infty
                          $$

                          As noted, this is equivalent to $sum |a_j| < +infty$.






                          share|cite|improve this answer









                          $endgroup$



                          Definition

                          The infinite product $prod (1+b_j)$ is said to converge absolutely iff the infinite series $sum b_j$ converges absolutely.



                          (Any text that discusses infinite products should include this definition. And it should include the theorem that if an infinite product converges absolutely, then it converges.)



                          Your case:
                          $$
                          prodfrac11+a_j = prod (1+b_j),
                          $$

                          where



                          $$
                          b_j = 1 - frac11+a_j = fraca_j1+a_j
                          $$



                          So the criterion becomes:



                          $$
                          sumleft|fraca_j1+a_jright| < +infty
                          $$

                          As noted, this is equivalent to $sum |a_j| < +infty$.







                          share|cite|improve this answer












                          share|cite|improve this answer



                          share|cite|improve this answer










                          answered Mar 23 at 11:53









                          GEdgarGEdgar

                          63.5k269175




                          63.5k269175





















                              -1












                              $begingroup$

                              If we define $$S=prod_n=1^inftyleft|1over 1+a_nright|$$then we have $$ln S=sum_n=1^inftyln left|1over 1+a_nright|$$Since boundedness of $S>0$ is equivalent to the boundedness of $ln S$, then any criteria on the absolute convergence of product of $mathbfleft1over 1+a_nright$ is equivalent to that for the convergence of the sum of $mathbflnleft$.






                              share|cite|improve this answer











                              $endgroup$












                              • $begingroup$
                                I'd say $sum ln frac11+$ instead otherwise you'll have some trouble with $a_n=-2$
                                $endgroup$
                                – reuns
                                Mar 23 at 7:02










                              • $begingroup$
                                @reuns suppose it is given that $sum ln frac 1 a_n$ is convergent. Does that imply $sum ln frac 1 1+a_n$ is also convergent?
                                $endgroup$
                                – math maniac.
                                Mar 23 at 7:08











                              • $begingroup$
                                If $a_n=-2$ constantly, then by substitution $S=1$, but the product (itself, not the absolute value) oscillates between $-1$ and $1$, i.e. despite absolute convergence, the product doesn't converge to any real number (an odd thing!). Also $sumln$ is an infimum to $sunln$.
                                $endgroup$
                                – Mostafa Ayaz
                                Mar 23 at 7:08











                              • $begingroup$
                                Absolute convergence of the product doesn't mean $prod_n |frac11+a_n|$ converges in $BbbC^*$ but that $prod_n frac11+a_n$ converges in $BbbC^*$ independently of the ordering. For this we look at the convergence of $sum_n f(a_n)$ with $f(x) = ln(1+|x|)$ or $f(x) = |x|$ with just a subtlety if $a_n=-1$ for some $n$
                                $endgroup$
                                – reuns
                                Mar 23 at 7:11











                              • $begingroup$
                                @reuns, yes it does. Check out en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Absolute_convergence
                                $endgroup$
                                – Mostafa Ayaz
                                Mar 23 at 7:17















                              -1












                              $begingroup$

                              If we define $$S=prod_n=1^inftyleft|1over 1+a_nright|$$then we have $$ln S=sum_n=1^inftyln left|1over 1+a_nright|$$Since boundedness of $S>0$ is equivalent to the boundedness of $ln S$, then any criteria on the absolute convergence of product of $mathbfleft1over 1+a_nright$ is equivalent to that for the convergence of the sum of $mathbflnleft$.






                              share|cite|improve this answer











                              $endgroup$












                              • $begingroup$
                                I'd say $sum ln frac11+$ instead otherwise you'll have some trouble with $a_n=-2$
                                $endgroup$
                                – reuns
                                Mar 23 at 7:02










                              • $begingroup$
                                @reuns suppose it is given that $sum ln frac 1 a_n$ is convergent. Does that imply $sum ln frac 1 1+a_n$ is also convergent?
                                $endgroup$
                                – math maniac.
                                Mar 23 at 7:08











                              • $begingroup$
                                If $a_n=-2$ constantly, then by substitution $S=1$, but the product (itself, not the absolute value) oscillates between $-1$ and $1$, i.e. despite absolute convergence, the product doesn't converge to any real number (an odd thing!). Also $sumln$ is an infimum to $sunln$.
                                $endgroup$
                                – Mostafa Ayaz
                                Mar 23 at 7:08











                              • $begingroup$
                                Absolute convergence of the product doesn't mean $prod_n |frac11+a_n|$ converges in $BbbC^*$ but that $prod_n frac11+a_n$ converges in $BbbC^*$ independently of the ordering. For this we look at the convergence of $sum_n f(a_n)$ with $f(x) = ln(1+|x|)$ or $f(x) = |x|$ with just a subtlety if $a_n=-1$ for some $n$
                                $endgroup$
                                – reuns
                                Mar 23 at 7:11











                              • $begingroup$
                                @reuns, yes it does. Check out en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Absolute_convergence
                                $endgroup$
                                – Mostafa Ayaz
                                Mar 23 at 7:17













                              -1












                              -1








                              -1





                              $begingroup$

                              If we define $$S=prod_n=1^inftyleft|1over 1+a_nright|$$then we have $$ln S=sum_n=1^inftyln left|1over 1+a_nright|$$Since boundedness of $S>0$ is equivalent to the boundedness of $ln S$, then any criteria on the absolute convergence of product of $mathbfleft1over 1+a_nright$ is equivalent to that for the convergence of the sum of $mathbflnleft$.






                              share|cite|improve this answer











                              $endgroup$



                              If we define $$S=prod_n=1^inftyleft|1over 1+a_nright|$$then we have $$ln S=sum_n=1^inftyln left|1over 1+a_nright|$$Since boundedness of $S>0$ is equivalent to the boundedness of $ln S$, then any criteria on the absolute convergence of product of $mathbfleft1over 1+a_nright$ is equivalent to that for the convergence of the sum of $mathbflnleft$.







                              share|cite|improve this answer














                              share|cite|improve this answer



                              share|cite|improve this answer








                              edited Mar 23 at 7:21

























                              answered Mar 23 at 6:54









                              Mostafa AyazMostafa Ayaz

                              18.1k31040




                              18.1k31040











                              • $begingroup$
                                I'd say $sum ln frac11+$ instead otherwise you'll have some trouble with $a_n=-2$
                                $endgroup$
                                – reuns
                                Mar 23 at 7:02










                              • $begingroup$
                                @reuns suppose it is given that $sum ln frac 1 a_n$ is convergent. Does that imply $sum ln frac 1 1+a_n$ is also convergent?
                                $endgroup$
                                – math maniac.
                                Mar 23 at 7:08











                              • $begingroup$
                                If $a_n=-2$ constantly, then by substitution $S=1$, but the product (itself, not the absolute value) oscillates between $-1$ and $1$, i.e. despite absolute convergence, the product doesn't converge to any real number (an odd thing!). Also $sumln$ is an infimum to $sunln$.
                                $endgroup$
                                – Mostafa Ayaz
                                Mar 23 at 7:08











                              • $begingroup$
                                Absolute convergence of the product doesn't mean $prod_n |frac11+a_n|$ converges in $BbbC^*$ but that $prod_n frac11+a_n$ converges in $BbbC^*$ independently of the ordering. For this we look at the convergence of $sum_n f(a_n)$ with $f(x) = ln(1+|x|)$ or $f(x) = |x|$ with just a subtlety if $a_n=-1$ for some $n$
                                $endgroup$
                                – reuns
                                Mar 23 at 7:11











                              • $begingroup$
                                @reuns, yes it does. Check out en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Absolute_convergence
                                $endgroup$
                                – Mostafa Ayaz
                                Mar 23 at 7:17
















                              • $begingroup$
                                I'd say $sum ln frac11+$ instead otherwise you'll have some trouble with $a_n=-2$
                                $endgroup$
                                – reuns
                                Mar 23 at 7:02










                              • $begingroup$
                                @reuns suppose it is given that $sum ln frac 1 a_n$ is convergent. Does that imply $sum ln frac 1 1+a_n$ is also convergent?
                                $endgroup$
                                – math maniac.
                                Mar 23 at 7:08











                              • $begingroup$
                                If $a_n=-2$ constantly, then by substitution $S=1$, but the product (itself, not the absolute value) oscillates between $-1$ and $1$, i.e. despite absolute convergence, the product doesn't converge to any real number (an odd thing!). Also $sumln$ is an infimum to $sunln$.
                                $endgroup$
                                – Mostafa Ayaz
                                Mar 23 at 7:08











                              • $begingroup$
                                Absolute convergence of the product doesn't mean $prod_n |frac11+a_n|$ converges in $BbbC^*$ but that $prod_n frac11+a_n$ converges in $BbbC^*$ independently of the ordering. For this we look at the convergence of $sum_n f(a_n)$ with $f(x) = ln(1+|x|)$ or $f(x) = |x|$ with just a subtlety if $a_n=-1$ for some $n$
                                $endgroup$
                                – reuns
                                Mar 23 at 7:11











                              • $begingroup$
                                @reuns, yes it does. Check out en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Absolute_convergence
                                $endgroup$
                                – Mostafa Ayaz
                                Mar 23 at 7:17















                              $begingroup$
                              I'd say $sum ln frac11+$ instead otherwise you'll have some trouble with $a_n=-2$
                              $endgroup$
                              – reuns
                              Mar 23 at 7:02




                              $begingroup$
                              I'd say $sum ln frac11+$ instead otherwise you'll have some trouble with $a_n=-2$
                              $endgroup$
                              – reuns
                              Mar 23 at 7:02












                              $begingroup$
                              @reuns suppose it is given that $sum ln frac 1 a_n$ is convergent. Does that imply $sum ln frac 1 1+a_n$ is also convergent?
                              $endgroup$
                              – math maniac.
                              Mar 23 at 7:08





                              $begingroup$
                              @reuns suppose it is given that $sum ln frac 1 a_n$ is convergent. Does that imply $sum ln frac 1 1+a_n$ is also convergent?
                              $endgroup$
                              – math maniac.
                              Mar 23 at 7:08













                              $begingroup$
                              If $a_n=-2$ constantly, then by substitution $S=1$, but the product (itself, not the absolute value) oscillates between $-1$ and $1$, i.e. despite absolute convergence, the product doesn't converge to any real number (an odd thing!). Also $sumln$ is an infimum to $sunln$.
                              $endgroup$
                              – Mostafa Ayaz
                              Mar 23 at 7:08





                              $begingroup$
                              If $a_n=-2$ constantly, then by substitution $S=1$, but the product (itself, not the absolute value) oscillates between $-1$ and $1$, i.e. despite absolute convergence, the product doesn't converge to any real number (an odd thing!). Also $sumln$ is an infimum to $sunln$.
                              $endgroup$
                              – Mostafa Ayaz
                              Mar 23 at 7:08













                              $begingroup$
                              Absolute convergence of the product doesn't mean $prod_n |frac11+a_n|$ converges in $BbbC^*$ but that $prod_n frac11+a_n$ converges in $BbbC^*$ independently of the ordering. For this we look at the convergence of $sum_n f(a_n)$ with $f(x) = ln(1+|x|)$ or $f(x) = |x|$ with just a subtlety if $a_n=-1$ for some $n$
                              $endgroup$
                              – reuns
                              Mar 23 at 7:11





                              $begingroup$
                              Absolute convergence of the product doesn't mean $prod_n |frac11+a_n|$ converges in $BbbC^*$ but that $prod_n frac11+a_n$ converges in $BbbC^*$ independently of the ordering. For this we look at the convergence of $sum_n f(a_n)$ with $f(x) = ln(1+|x|)$ or $f(x) = |x|$ with just a subtlety if $a_n=-1$ for some $n$
                              $endgroup$
                              – reuns
                              Mar 23 at 7:11













                              $begingroup$
                              @reuns, yes it does. Check out en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Absolute_convergence
                              $endgroup$
                              – Mostafa Ayaz
                              Mar 23 at 7:17




                              $begingroup$
                              @reuns, yes it does. Check out en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Absolute_convergence
                              $endgroup$
                              – Mostafa Ayaz
                              Mar 23 at 7:17

















                              draft saved

                              draft discarded
















































                              Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


                              • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                              But avoid


                              • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                              • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

                              Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


                              To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                              draft saved


                              draft discarded














                              StackExchange.ready(
                              function ()
                              StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3158993%2fwhat-is-meant-by-the-absolute-convergence-of-the-infinite-product-prod-limits%23new-answer', 'question_page');

                              );

                              Post as a guest















                              Required, but never shown





















































                              Required, but never shown














                              Required, but never shown












                              Required, but never shown







                              Required, but never shown

































                              Required, but never shown














                              Required, but never shown












                              Required, but never shown







                              Required, but never shown







                              Popular posts from this blog

                              How should I support this large drywall patch? Planned maintenance scheduled April 23, 2019 at 00:00UTC (8:00pm US/Eastern) Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara Unicorn Meta Zoo #1: Why another podcast?How do I cover large gaps in drywall?How do I keep drywall around a patch from crumbling?Can I glue a second layer of drywall?How to patch long strip on drywall?Large drywall patch: how to avoid bulging seams?Drywall Mesh Patch vs. Bulge? To remove or not to remove?How to fix this drywall job?Prep drywall before backsplashWhat's the best way to fix this horrible drywall patch job?Drywall patching using 3M Patch Plus Primer

                              random experiment with two different functions on unit interval Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara Planned maintenance scheduled April 23, 2019 at 00:00UTC (8:00pm US/Eastern)Random variable and probability space notionsRandom Walk with EdgesFinding functions where the increase over a random interval is Poisson distributedNumber of days until dayCan an observed event in fact be of zero probability?Unit random processmodels of coins and uniform distributionHow to get the number of successes given $n$ trials , probability $P$ and a random variable $X$Absorbing Markov chain in a computer. Is “almost every” turned into always convergence in computer executions?Stopped random walk is not uniformly integrable

                              Lowndes Grove History Architecture References Navigation menu32°48′6″N 79°57′58″W / 32.80167°N 79.96611°W / 32.80167; -79.9661132°48′6″N 79°57′58″W / 32.80167°N 79.96611°W / 32.80167; -79.9661178002500"National Register Information System"Historic houses of South Carolina"Lowndes Grove""+32° 48' 6.00", −79° 57' 58.00""Lowndes Grove, Charleston County (260 St. Margaret St., Charleston)""Lowndes Grove"The Charleston ExpositionIt Happened in South Carolina"Lowndes Grove (House), Saint Margaret Street & Sixth Avenue, Charleston, Charleston County, SC(Photographs)"Plantations of the Carolina Low Countrye