Prove that $G_2=B_1,B_2,…,B_p$ is a multiplicative group isomorphic with $G_1=A_1,A_2,…,A_p$How to compute in $BbbZ_6 rtimes BbbZ_2$?Prove that $f$ is a group isomorphism, where $f$ interchanges the primes.The central product of two cyclic subgroups of prime power order for one $p$ is isomorphic to direct product of two cyclic groups of prime power orderIs this a feasible way to show that a group $G$ is isomorphic to its opposite group $G^op$?Are these subgroups?Where is the error in this proof? (possibly bad surjection assumption)$mathbbC^3$ as a pointwise alegbra has only one simple module: true or false?Isomorphic subgroups of $S_n$ and bijection of setsOn a certain bijection of the multiplicative group modulo prime $p=2^k+1$.Problem : Normal form of product of matrices over a PID

A three room house but a three headED dog

Offered promotion but I'm leaving. Should I tell?

How do you like my writing?

Why is Beresheet doing a only a one-way trip?

Built-In Shelves/Bookcases - IKEA vs Built

How much stiffer are 23c tires over 28c?

Low budget alien movie about the Earth being cooked

Are babies of evil humanoid species inherently evil?

How did the power source of Mar-Vell's aircraft end up with her?

Is it possible to have an Abelian group under two different binary operations but the binary operations are not distributive?

Time travel short story where dinosaur doesn't taste like chicken

Moving plot label

infinitive telling the purpose

Why would one plane in this picture not have gear down yet?

Is there an elementary proof that there are infinitely many primes that are *not* completely split in an abelian extension?

Examples of a statistic that is not independent of sample's distribution?

Is there a window switcher for GNOME that shows the actual window?

Force user to remove USB token

Solving "Resistance between two nodes on a grid" problem in Mathematica

In the late 1940’s to early 1950’s what technology was available that could melt a LOT of ice?

Does "variables should live in the smallest scope as possible" include the case "variables should not exist if possible"?

How much attack damage does the AC boost from a shield prevent on average?

How to create a hard link to an inode (ext4)?

Replacing Windows 7 security updates with anti-virus?



Prove that $G_2=B_1,B_2,…,B_p$ is a multiplicative group isomorphic with $G_1=A_1,A_2,…,A_p$


How to compute in $BbbZ_6 rtimes BbbZ_2$?Prove that $f$ is a group isomorphism, where $f$ interchanges the primes.The central product of two cyclic subgroups of prime power order for one $p$ is isomorphic to direct product of two cyclic groups of prime power orderIs this a feasible way to show that a group $G$ is isomorphic to its opposite group $G^op$?Are these subgroups?Where is the error in this proof? (possibly bad surjection assumption)$mathbbC^3$ as a pointwise alegbra has only one simple module: true or false?Isomorphic subgroups of $S_n$ and bijection of setsOn a certain bijection of the multiplicative group modulo prime $p=2^k+1$.Problem : Normal form of product of matrices over a PID













-3












$begingroup$


Let $m,n,pgeq3$ be natural numbers and $G_1=A_1,A_2,...,A_p$ a multiplicative group of order $p$ with elements from $M_2(mathbbZ)$. For every $A_i$ from $G$ we attach $B_i$ such that if $A=(a_ij), i,j=1,n$, then $B=(a_ij) pmod m$. Prove that the set $G_2=B_1,B_2,...,B_p$ is a multiplicative group isomorphic with $G_1$, where the multiplication is that of $M_n(mathbbZ_m)$.



I think $f:G_1rightarrow G_2$, $f(A_i)=B_i$ is an isomorphism and thus the problem can be easily solved, but I am unsure it's so basic. Any help to finish it?










share|cite|improve this question









New contributor




user651754 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.







$endgroup$
















    -3












    $begingroup$


    Let $m,n,pgeq3$ be natural numbers and $G_1=A_1,A_2,...,A_p$ a multiplicative group of order $p$ with elements from $M_2(mathbbZ)$. For every $A_i$ from $G$ we attach $B_i$ such that if $A=(a_ij), i,j=1,n$, then $B=(a_ij) pmod m$. Prove that the set $G_2=B_1,B_2,...,B_p$ is a multiplicative group isomorphic with $G_1$, where the multiplication is that of $M_n(mathbbZ_m)$.



    I think $f:G_1rightarrow G_2$, $f(A_i)=B_i$ is an isomorphism and thus the problem can be easily solved, but I am unsure it's so basic. Any help to finish it?










    share|cite|improve this question









    New contributor




    user651754 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
    Check out our Code of Conduct.







    $endgroup$














      -3












      -3








      -3





      $begingroup$


      Let $m,n,pgeq3$ be natural numbers and $G_1=A_1,A_2,...,A_p$ a multiplicative group of order $p$ with elements from $M_2(mathbbZ)$. For every $A_i$ from $G$ we attach $B_i$ such that if $A=(a_ij), i,j=1,n$, then $B=(a_ij) pmod m$. Prove that the set $G_2=B_1,B_2,...,B_p$ is a multiplicative group isomorphic with $G_1$, where the multiplication is that of $M_n(mathbbZ_m)$.



      I think $f:G_1rightarrow G_2$, $f(A_i)=B_i$ is an isomorphism and thus the problem can be easily solved, but I am unsure it's so basic. Any help to finish it?










      share|cite|improve this question









      New contributor




      user651754 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.







      $endgroup$




      Let $m,n,pgeq3$ be natural numbers and $G_1=A_1,A_2,...,A_p$ a multiplicative group of order $p$ with elements from $M_2(mathbbZ)$. For every $A_i$ from $G$ we attach $B_i$ such that if $A=(a_ij), i,j=1,n$, then $B=(a_ij) pmod m$. Prove that the set $G_2=B_1,B_2,...,B_p$ is a multiplicative group isomorphic with $G_1$, where the multiplication is that of $M_n(mathbbZ_m)$.



      I think $f:G_1rightarrow G_2$, $f(A_i)=B_i$ is an isomorphism and thus the problem can be easily solved, but I am unsure it's so basic. Any help to finish it?







      abstract-algebra group-theory finite-groups group-isomorphism






      share|cite|improve this question









      New contributor




      user651754 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.











      share|cite|improve this question









      New contributor




      user651754 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.









      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question








      edited yesterday









      user26857

      39.4k124183




      39.4k124183






      New contributor




      user651754 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.









      asked 2 days ago









      user651754user651754

      454




      454




      New contributor




      user651754 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.





      New contributor





      user651754 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.






      user651754 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.




















          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          1












          $begingroup$

          This is not completely trivial. The map $f$ is certainly a homomorphism, but to show that it is an isomorphism, you need to show that its kernel is trivial.



          This follows from the fact that the kernel of the reduction modulo $m$ map $rm SL(n,mathbb Z) to rm SL(n,mathbb Z/mmathbb Z)$ is torsion-free for $m ge 3$. You can find a proof of this in Lemma 2.6 here, for example.






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$












          • $begingroup$
            Thanks! I am not familiar with the notion of torsion, so is there an easier way to show that the map $f$ is an isomorphism?
            $endgroup$
            – user651754
            2 days ago










          • $begingroup$
            A torsion-free group is one in which every non-identity element has infinite order. I am afraid that there is no easier way to do this, because if the kernel of the reduction mod $m$ had elements of finite order, then the result that you are trying to prove would not be true.
            $endgroup$
            – Derek Holt
            2 days ago










          Your Answer





          StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
          return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
          StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
          StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
          );
          );
          , "mathjax-editing");

          StackExchange.ready(function()
          var channelOptions =
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "69"
          ;
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
          createEditor();
          );

          else
          createEditor();

          );

          function createEditor()
          StackExchange.prepareEditor(
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
          convertImagesToLinks: true,
          noModals: true,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: 10,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          imageUploader:
          brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
          contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
          allowUrls: true
          ,
          noCode: true, onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          );



          );






          user651754 is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.









          draft saved

          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function ()
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3142116%2fprove-that-g-2-b-1-b-2-b-p-is-a-multiplicative-group-isomorphic-with%23new-answer', 'question_page');

          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown

























          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes








          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes









          1












          $begingroup$

          This is not completely trivial. The map $f$ is certainly a homomorphism, but to show that it is an isomorphism, you need to show that its kernel is trivial.



          This follows from the fact that the kernel of the reduction modulo $m$ map $rm SL(n,mathbb Z) to rm SL(n,mathbb Z/mmathbb Z)$ is torsion-free for $m ge 3$. You can find a proof of this in Lemma 2.6 here, for example.






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$












          • $begingroup$
            Thanks! I am not familiar with the notion of torsion, so is there an easier way to show that the map $f$ is an isomorphism?
            $endgroup$
            – user651754
            2 days ago










          • $begingroup$
            A torsion-free group is one in which every non-identity element has infinite order. I am afraid that there is no easier way to do this, because if the kernel of the reduction mod $m$ had elements of finite order, then the result that you are trying to prove would not be true.
            $endgroup$
            – Derek Holt
            2 days ago















          1












          $begingroup$

          This is not completely trivial. The map $f$ is certainly a homomorphism, but to show that it is an isomorphism, you need to show that its kernel is trivial.



          This follows from the fact that the kernel of the reduction modulo $m$ map $rm SL(n,mathbb Z) to rm SL(n,mathbb Z/mmathbb Z)$ is torsion-free for $m ge 3$. You can find a proof of this in Lemma 2.6 here, for example.






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$












          • $begingroup$
            Thanks! I am not familiar with the notion of torsion, so is there an easier way to show that the map $f$ is an isomorphism?
            $endgroup$
            – user651754
            2 days ago










          • $begingroup$
            A torsion-free group is one in which every non-identity element has infinite order. I am afraid that there is no easier way to do this, because if the kernel of the reduction mod $m$ had elements of finite order, then the result that you are trying to prove would not be true.
            $endgroup$
            – Derek Holt
            2 days ago













          1












          1








          1





          $begingroup$

          This is not completely trivial. The map $f$ is certainly a homomorphism, but to show that it is an isomorphism, you need to show that its kernel is trivial.



          This follows from the fact that the kernel of the reduction modulo $m$ map $rm SL(n,mathbb Z) to rm SL(n,mathbb Z/mmathbb Z)$ is torsion-free for $m ge 3$. You can find a proof of this in Lemma 2.6 here, for example.






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$



          This is not completely trivial. The map $f$ is certainly a homomorphism, but to show that it is an isomorphism, you need to show that its kernel is trivial.



          This follows from the fact that the kernel of the reduction modulo $m$ map $rm SL(n,mathbb Z) to rm SL(n,mathbb Z/mmathbb Z)$ is torsion-free for $m ge 3$. You can find a proof of this in Lemma 2.6 here, for example.







          share|cite|improve this answer












          share|cite|improve this answer



          share|cite|improve this answer










          answered 2 days ago









          Derek HoltDerek Holt

          54.2k53571




          54.2k53571











          • $begingroup$
            Thanks! I am not familiar with the notion of torsion, so is there an easier way to show that the map $f$ is an isomorphism?
            $endgroup$
            – user651754
            2 days ago










          • $begingroup$
            A torsion-free group is one in which every non-identity element has infinite order. I am afraid that there is no easier way to do this, because if the kernel of the reduction mod $m$ had elements of finite order, then the result that you are trying to prove would not be true.
            $endgroup$
            – Derek Holt
            2 days ago
















          • $begingroup$
            Thanks! I am not familiar with the notion of torsion, so is there an easier way to show that the map $f$ is an isomorphism?
            $endgroup$
            – user651754
            2 days ago










          • $begingroup$
            A torsion-free group is one in which every non-identity element has infinite order. I am afraid that there is no easier way to do this, because if the kernel of the reduction mod $m$ had elements of finite order, then the result that you are trying to prove would not be true.
            $endgroup$
            – Derek Holt
            2 days ago















          $begingroup$
          Thanks! I am not familiar with the notion of torsion, so is there an easier way to show that the map $f$ is an isomorphism?
          $endgroup$
          – user651754
          2 days ago




          $begingroup$
          Thanks! I am not familiar with the notion of torsion, so is there an easier way to show that the map $f$ is an isomorphism?
          $endgroup$
          – user651754
          2 days ago












          $begingroup$
          A torsion-free group is one in which every non-identity element has infinite order. I am afraid that there is no easier way to do this, because if the kernel of the reduction mod $m$ had elements of finite order, then the result that you are trying to prove would not be true.
          $endgroup$
          – Derek Holt
          2 days ago




          $begingroup$
          A torsion-free group is one in which every non-identity element has infinite order. I am afraid that there is no easier way to do this, because if the kernel of the reduction mod $m$ had elements of finite order, then the result that you are trying to prove would not be true.
          $endgroup$
          – Derek Holt
          2 days ago










          user651754 is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.









          draft saved

          draft discarded


















          user651754 is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.












          user651754 is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.











          user651754 is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.














          Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

          But avoid


          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

          Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




          draft saved


          draft discarded














          StackExchange.ready(
          function ()
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3142116%2fprove-that-g-2-b-1-b-2-b-p-is-a-multiplicative-group-isomorphic-with%23new-answer', 'question_page');

          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown





















































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown

































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown







          Popular posts from this blog

          Moe incest case Sentencing See also References Navigation menu"'Australian Josef Fritzl' fathered four children by daughter""Small town recoils in horror at 'Australian Fritzl' incest case""Victorian rape allegations echo Fritzl case - Just In (Australian Broadcasting Corporation)""Incest father jailed for 22 years""'Australian Fritzl' sentenced to 22 years in prison for abusing daughter for three decades""RSJ v The Queen"

          Who is our nearest planetary neighbor, on average?Santa Claus flies to the South PoleSeven Spheres of Unequal Mass, a weighing problem with a twistDescribe a large integerFast Mental Calculation of $7.5^7$Math in Space (without the help of celebrities)Find the value of $bigstar$: Puzzle 8 - InequalityWho drinks beer while running anyway?A Crucial DeliveryRanking And AverageHow long will my money last at roulette?

          Daza language Contents Vocabulary Phonology References External links Navigation menudaza1242Daza"Dazaga"eeee178086576