conditional probability of endig up in a specific setprobability of at least one person having a gem of type $n$, etc.Transitive and probabilityProbability of working machine with $3$ componentsConditioning a conditional probability to a sigma algebraConditional probability of playing a gameconditional probability about gamblingProbability of letter transmitting and receivingProbability of geometric random variables in certain orderKnockout tournament probabilityA gambler is playing a game which has a probability 0.6 to wins with $1 and probability 0.4 to lose with $1

Do Bugbears' arms literally get longer when it's their turn?

Should QA ask requirements to developers?

Why doesn't this Google Translate ad use the word "Translation" instead of "Translate"?

BitNot does not flip bits in the way I expected

Is Gradient Descent central to every optimizer?

Is there an equal sign with wider gap?

Things to avoid when using voltage regulators?

Algorithm to convert a fixed-length string to the smallest possible collision-free representation?

What Happens when Passenger Refuses to Fly Boeing 737 Max?

Why the color red for the Republican Party

Is there an elementary proof that there are infinitely many primes that are *not* completely split in an abelian extension?

Logic. Truth of a negation

Reverse string, can I make it faster?

Why is this plane circling around the Lucknow airport every day?

How to create a hard link to an inode (ext4)?

Aliens englobed the Solar System: will we notice?

Good for you! in Russian

Subset counting for even numbers

If the Captain's screens are out, does he switch seats with the co-pilot?

Should I tell my boss the work he did was worthless

What wound would be of little consequence to a biped but terrible for a quadruped?

Why does Deadpool say "You're welcome, Canada," after shooting Ryan Reynolds in the end credits?

Why does the negative sign arise in this thermodynamic relation?

Should I take out a loan for a friend to invest on my behalf?



conditional probability of endig up in a specific set


probability of at least one person having a gem of type $n$, etc.Transitive and probabilityProbability of working machine with $3$ componentsConditioning a conditional probability to a sigma algebraConditional probability of playing a gameconditional probability about gamblingProbability of letter transmitting and receivingProbability of geometric random variables in certain orderKnockout tournament probabilityA gambler is playing a game which has a probability 0.6 to wins with $1 and probability 0.4 to lose with $1













1












$begingroup$


Assume we have three initial sets $mathcalA,mathcalB,mathcalC$ and 4 final sets $mathrmA,mathrmB,mathrmC,mathrmX$.
If I know that an element of $mathcalA$ can only end up with probability $a$ in $mathrmA$ and with probability $(1-a)$ in $mathrmX$. An element from $mathcalB$ can only end up with probability $b$ in $mathrmB$ and with prob. $(1-b)$ in $mathrmX$. And finally an element in $mathcalC$ can either end up with $p_1$ in $mathrmA$, with $p_2$ in $mathrmB$, with $p_3$ in $mathrmX$ or with probability $1-p_1-p_2-p_3$ in $mathrmC$.



I am a bit confused on what the conditional probability is:
$$mathbbP(i in mathcalC ; textends up in; mathrmC mid X=)$$
Is it $$frac1-(p_1+p_2+p_3)mathbbP(X=)$$ or $$frac1-(p_1+p_2)mathbbP(X=)$$ since we have that the set X is empty and therefore also no node from $mathcalC$ can be in it?










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$
















    1












    $begingroup$


    Assume we have three initial sets $mathcalA,mathcalB,mathcalC$ and 4 final sets $mathrmA,mathrmB,mathrmC,mathrmX$.
    If I know that an element of $mathcalA$ can only end up with probability $a$ in $mathrmA$ and with probability $(1-a)$ in $mathrmX$. An element from $mathcalB$ can only end up with probability $b$ in $mathrmB$ and with prob. $(1-b)$ in $mathrmX$. And finally an element in $mathcalC$ can either end up with $p_1$ in $mathrmA$, with $p_2$ in $mathrmB$, with $p_3$ in $mathrmX$ or with probability $1-p_1-p_2-p_3$ in $mathrmC$.



    I am a bit confused on what the conditional probability is:
    $$mathbbP(i in mathcalC ; textends up in; mathrmC mid X=)$$
    Is it $$frac1-(p_1+p_2+p_3)mathbbP(X=)$$ or $$frac1-(p_1+p_2)mathbbP(X=)$$ since we have that the set X is empty and therefore also no node from $mathcalC$ can be in it?










    share|cite|improve this question









    $endgroup$














      1












      1








      1





      $begingroup$


      Assume we have three initial sets $mathcalA,mathcalB,mathcalC$ and 4 final sets $mathrmA,mathrmB,mathrmC,mathrmX$.
      If I know that an element of $mathcalA$ can only end up with probability $a$ in $mathrmA$ and with probability $(1-a)$ in $mathrmX$. An element from $mathcalB$ can only end up with probability $b$ in $mathrmB$ and with prob. $(1-b)$ in $mathrmX$. And finally an element in $mathcalC$ can either end up with $p_1$ in $mathrmA$, with $p_2$ in $mathrmB$, with $p_3$ in $mathrmX$ or with probability $1-p_1-p_2-p_3$ in $mathrmC$.



      I am a bit confused on what the conditional probability is:
      $$mathbbP(i in mathcalC ; textends up in; mathrmC mid X=)$$
      Is it $$frac1-(p_1+p_2+p_3)mathbbP(X=)$$ or $$frac1-(p_1+p_2)mathbbP(X=)$$ since we have that the set X is empty and therefore also no node from $mathcalC$ can be in it?










      share|cite|improve this question









      $endgroup$




      Assume we have three initial sets $mathcalA,mathcalB,mathcalC$ and 4 final sets $mathrmA,mathrmB,mathrmC,mathrmX$.
      If I know that an element of $mathcalA$ can only end up with probability $a$ in $mathrmA$ and with probability $(1-a)$ in $mathrmX$. An element from $mathcalB$ can only end up with probability $b$ in $mathrmB$ and with prob. $(1-b)$ in $mathrmX$. And finally an element in $mathcalC$ can either end up with $p_1$ in $mathrmA$, with $p_2$ in $mathrmB$, with $p_3$ in $mathrmX$ or with probability $1-p_1-p_2-p_3$ in $mathrmC$.



      I am a bit confused on what the conditional probability is:
      $$mathbbP(i in mathcalC ; textends up in; mathrmC mid X=)$$
      Is it $$frac1-(p_1+p_2+p_3)mathbbP(X=)$$ or $$frac1-(p_1+p_2)mathbbP(X=)$$ since we have that the set X is empty and therefore also no node from $mathcalC$ can be in it?







      probability






      share|cite|improve this question













      share|cite|improve this question











      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question










      asked 2 days ago









      AlisatAlisat

      589




      589




















          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          1












          $begingroup$

          Your first answer is correct by a direct application of Bayes theorem.



          P (i ends up in C | X empty) = P (X empty | i ends up in C) * P(i ends up in C ) / P( X empty )



          What is not present in your expression is P( X empty | i ends up in C ) = 1, but that does not change the result.






          share|cite|improve this answer










          New contributor




          dnqxt is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
          Check out our Code of Conduct.






          $endgroup$












            Your Answer





            StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
            return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
            StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
            StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
            );
            );
            , "mathjax-editing");

            StackExchange.ready(function()
            var channelOptions =
            tags: "".split(" "),
            id: "69"
            ;
            initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

            StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
            // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
            if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
            StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
            createEditor();
            );

            else
            createEditor();

            );

            function createEditor()
            StackExchange.prepareEditor(
            heartbeatType: 'answer',
            autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
            convertImagesToLinks: true,
            noModals: true,
            showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
            reputationToPostImages: 10,
            bindNavPrevention: true,
            postfix: "",
            imageUploader:
            brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
            contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
            allowUrls: true
            ,
            noCode: true, onDemand: true,
            discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
            ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
            );



            );













            draft saved

            draft discarded


















            StackExchange.ready(
            function ()
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3142184%2fconditional-probability-of-endig-up-in-a-specific-set%23new-answer', 'question_page');

            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown

























            1 Answer
            1






            active

            oldest

            votes








            1 Answer
            1






            active

            oldest

            votes









            active

            oldest

            votes






            active

            oldest

            votes









            1












            $begingroup$

            Your first answer is correct by a direct application of Bayes theorem.



            P (i ends up in C | X empty) = P (X empty | i ends up in C) * P(i ends up in C ) / P( X empty )



            What is not present in your expression is P( X empty | i ends up in C ) = 1, but that does not change the result.






            share|cite|improve this answer










            New contributor




            dnqxt is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
            Check out our Code of Conduct.






            $endgroup$

















              1












              $begingroup$

              Your first answer is correct by a direct application of Bayes theorem.



              P (i ends up in C | X empty) = P (X empty | i ends up in C) * P(i ends up in C ) / P( X empty )



              What is not present in your expression is P( X empty | i ends up in C ) = 1, but that does not change the result.






              share|cite|improve this answer










              New contributor




              dnqxt is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
              Check out our Code of Conduct.






              $endgroup$















                1












                1








                1





                $begingroup$

                Your first answer is correct by a direct application of Bayes theorem.



                P (i ends up in C | X empty) = P (X empty | i ends up in C) * P(i ends up in C ) / P( X empty )



                What is not present in your expression is P( X empty | i ends up in C ) = 1, but that does not change the result.






                share|cite|improve this answer










                New contributor




                dnqxt is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                Check out our Code of Conduct.






                $endgroup$



                Your first answer is correct by a direct application of Bayes theorem.



                P (i ends up in C | X empty) = P (X empty | i ends up in C) * P(i ends up in C ) / P( X empty )



                What is not present in your expression is P( X empty | i ends up in C ) = 1, but that does not change the result.







                share|cite|improve this answer










                New contributor




                dnqxt is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                Check out our Code of Conduct.









                share|cite|improve this answer



                share|cite|improve this answer








                edited 2 days ago





















                New contributor




                dnqxt is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                Check out our Code of Conduct.









                answered 2 days ago









                dnqxtdnqxt

                712




                712




                New contributor




                dnqxt is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                Check out our Code of Conduct.





                New contributor





                dnqxt is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                Check out our Code of Conduct.






                dnqxt is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                Check out our Code of Conduct.



























                    draft saved

                    draft discarded
















































                    Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


                    • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                    But avoid


                    • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                    • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

                    Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


                    To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                    draft saved


                    draft discarded














                    StackExchange.ready(
                    function ()
                    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3142184%2fconditional-probability-of-endig-up-in-a-specific-set%23new-answer', 'question_page');

                    );

                    Post as a guest















                    Required, but never shown





















































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown

































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown







                    Popular posts from this blog

                    Moe incest case Sentencing See also References Navigation menu"'Australian Josef Fritzl' fathered four children by daughter""Small town recoils in horror at 'Australian Fritzl' incest case""Victorian rape allegations echo Fritzl case - Just In (Australian Broadcasting Corporation)""Incest father jailed for 22 years""'Australian Fritzl' sentenced to 22 years in prison for abusing daughter for three decades""RSJ v The Queen"

                    John Burke, 9th Earl of Clanricarde References Navigation menuA General and heraldic dictionary of the peerage and baronetage of the British EmpireLeigh Rayment's Peerage Pages

                    Football at the 1986 Brunei Merdeka Games Contents Teams Group stage Knockout stage References Navigation menu"Brunei Merdeka Games 1986".