GLM model not corresponding to exploratory analysis (R-studio)Quantitative Analysis of Structure of Gaussian Mixture ModelTime series analysis ARCH($m$) modelTopics under Model Based Cluster AnalysisTime series analysis, moving-average model, ARMA modelsensitivity analysis of a modelFind the MLE of a GLMConstructing a 95% Confidence Interval (using output from r-studio)Why use the log_e function as link function for Poisson data in a GLM modelAnalysis of model fitDefinition of the fitted values of a GLM?
Does capillary rise violate hydrostatic paradox?
Can you take a "free object interaction" while incapacitated?
Why does the frost depth increase when the surface temperature warms up?
Started in 1987 vs. Starting in 1987
How do I lift the insulation blower into the attic?
Trouble reading roman numeral notation with flats
Friend wants my recommendation but I don't want to give it to him
Weird lines in Microsoft Word
Why does a 97 / 92 key piano exist by Bosendorfer?
Mortal danger in mid-grade literature
How to split IPA spelling into syllables
Why is "la Gestapo" feminine?
Is there a POSIX way to shutdown a UNIX machine?
What should be the ideal length of sentences in a blog post for ease of reading?
Would a primitive species be able to learn English from reading books alone?
Put the phone down / Put down the phone
Should I warn a new PhD Student?
How would a solely written language work mechanically
categorizing a variable turns it from insignificant to significant
Do native speakers use "ultima" and "proxima" frequently in spoken English?
Travelling in US for more than 90 days
How do you say "Trust your struggle." in French?
Reasons for having MCU pin-states default to pull-up/down out of reset
A seasonal riddle
GLM model not corresponding to exploratory analysis (R-studio)
Quantitative Analysis of Structure of Gaussian Mixture ModelTime series analysis ARCH($m$) modelTopics under Model Based Cluster AnalysisTime series analysis, moving-average model, ARMA modelsensitivity analysis of a modelFind the MLE of a GLMConstructing a 95% Confidence Interval (using output from r-studio)Why use the log_e function as link function for Poisson data in a GLM modelAnalysis of model fitDefinition of the fitted values of a GLM?
$begingroup$
I am working with a dataset from a job center that specialises in finding work placements for individuals with a criminal record.
There are 2 continuous factors (age, number of pre-convictions) and 4 discrete factors (placement, re-convicted, age group (grouped into 3 levels) and number of pre-convictions (grouped into 3 levels).
My exploratory analysis (consisting of Pearson's Chi-squared test, confidence regions, box plots and barcharts) suggested a strong relationship between number of pre-convictions and getting re-convicted, also with getting a work placement and getting re-convicted. I also found a weak (non-significant) relationship between age of individuals and getting re-convicted. However when I look at the summary data for the saturated model, the significance of my co-efficients seems to suggest the opposite to my analysis.
Could someone please explain what I am doing wrong? Or is this okay? I figured this model would be a good place to start and it would support my findings. Is this the correct approach for finding a suitable GLM?
Here is an image of the summary data as well as the factors
Thanks!
statistics
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I am working with a dataset from a job center that specialises in finding work placements for individuals with a criminal record.
There are 2 continuous factors (age, number of pre-convictions) and 4 discrete factors (placement, re-convicted, age group (grouped into 3 levels) and number of pre-convictions (grouped into 3 levels).
My exploratory analysis (consisting of Pearson's Chi-squared test, confidence regions, box plots and barcharts) suggested a strong relationship between number of pre-convictions and getting re-convicted, also with getting a work placement and getting re-convicted. I also found a weak (non-significant) relationship between age of individuals and getting re-convicted. However when I look at the summary data for the saturated model, the significance of my co-efficients seems to suggest the opposite to my analysis.
Could someone please explain what I am doing wrong? Or is this okay? I figured this model would be a good place to start and it would support my findings. Is this the correct approach for finding a suitable GLM?
Here is an image of the summary data as well as the factors
Thanks!
statistics
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Just in case you get no response here, try the statistics site after a while. Don't forget to mention the cross-post here if/when you do.
$endgroup$
– Lee David Chung Lin
Mar 13 at 22:05
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I am working with a dataset from a job center that specialises in finding work placements for individuals with a criminal record.
There are 2 continuous factors (age, number of pre-convictions) and 4 discrete factors (placement, re-convicted, age group (grouped into 3 levels) and number of pre-convictions (grouped into 3 levels).
My exploratory analysis (consisting of Pearson's Chi-squared test, confidence regions, box plots and barcharts) suggested a strong relationship between number of pre-convictions and getting re-convicted, also with getting a work placement and getting re-convicted. I also found a weak (non-significant) relationship between age of individuals and getting re-convicted. However when I look at the summary data for the saturated model, the significance of my co-efficients seems to suggest the opposite to my analysis.
Could someone please explain what I am doing wrong? Or is this okay? I figured this model would be a good place to start and it would support my findings. Is this the correct approach for finding a suitable GLM?
Here is an image of the summary data as well as the factors
Thanks!
statistics
$endgroup$
I am working with a dataset from a job center that specialises in finding work placements for individuals with a criminal record.
There are 2 continuous factors (age, number of pre-convictions) and 4 discrete factors (placement, re-convicted, age group (grouped into 3 levels) and number of pre-convictions (grouped into 3 levels).
My exploratory analysis (consisting of Pearson's Chi-squared test, confidence regions, box plots and barcharts) suggested a strong relationship between number of pre-convictions and getting re-convicted, also with getting a work placement and getting re-convicted. I also found a weak (non-significant) relationship between age of individuals and getting re-convicted. However when I look at the summary data for the saturated model, the significance of my co-efficients seems to suggest the opposite to my analysis.
Could someone please explain what I am doing wrong? Or is this okay? I figured this model would be a good place to start and it would support my findings. Is this the correct approach for finding a suitable GLM?
Here is an image of the summary data as well as the factors
Thanks!
statistics
statistics
asked Mar 13 at 18:54
user553480user553480
62
62
$begingroup$
Just in case you get no response here, try the statistics site after a while. Don't forget to mention the cross-post here if/when you do.
$endgroup$
– Lee David Chung Lin
Mar 13 at 22:05
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Just in case you get no response here, try the statistics site after a while. Don't forget to mention the cross-post here if/when you do.
$endgroup$
– Lee David Chung Lin
Mar 13 at 22:05
$begingroup$
Just in case you get no response here, try the statistics site after a while. Don't forget to mention the cross-post here if/when you do.
$endgroup$
– Lee David Chung Lin
Mar 13 at 22:05
$begingroup$
Just in case you get no response here, try the statistics site after a while. Don't forget to mention the cross-post here if/when you do.
$endgroup$
– Lee David Chung Lin
Mar 13 at 22:05
add a comment |
0
active
oldest
votes
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
);
);
, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);
else
createEditor();
);
function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);
);
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3147025%2fglm-model-not-corresponding-to-exploratory-analysis-r-studio%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
0
active
oldest
votes
0
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3147025%2fglm-model-not-corresponding-to-exploratory-analysis-r-studio%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
$begingroup$
Just in case you get no response here, try the statistics site after a while. Don't forget to mention the cross-post here if/when you do.
$endgroup$
– Lee David Chung Lin
Mar 13 at 22:05