GLM model not corresponding to exploratory analysis (R-studio)Quantitative Analysis of Structure of Gaussian Mixture ModelTime series analysis ARCH($m$) modelTopics under Model Based Cluster AnalysisTime series analysis, moving-average model, ARMA modelsensitivity analysis of a modelFind the MLE of a GLMConstructing a 95% Confidence Interval (using output from r-studio)Why use the log_e function as link function for Poisson data in a GLM modelAnalysis of model fitDefinition of the fitted values of a GLM?

Does capillary rise violate hydrostatic paradox?

Can you take a "free object interaction" while incapacitated?

Why does the frost depth increase when the surface temperature warms up?

Started in 1987 vs. Starting in 1987

How do I lift the insulation blower into the attic?

Trouble reading roman numeral notation with flats

Friend wants my recommendation but I don't want to give it to him

Weird lines in Microsoft Word

Why does a 97 / 92 key piano exist by Bosendorfer?

Mortal danger in mid-grade literature

How to split IPA spelling into syllables

Why is "la Gestapo" feminine?

Is there a POSIX way to shutdown a UNIX machine?

What should be the ideal length of sentences in a blog post for ease of reading?

Would a primitive species be able to learn English from reading books alone?

Put the phone down / Put down the phone

Should I warn a new PhD Student?

How would a solely written language work mechanically

categorizing a variable turns it from insignificant to significant

Do native speakers use "ultima" and "proxima" frequently in spoken English?

Travelling in US for more than 90 days

How do you say "Trust your struggle." in French?

Reasons for having MCU pin-states default to pull-up/down out of reset

A seasonal riddle



GLM model not corresponding to exploratory analysis (R-studio)


Quantitative Analysis of Structure of Gaussian Mixture ModelTime series analysis ARCH($m$) modelTopics under Model Based Cluster AnalysisTime series analysis, moving-average model, ARMA modelsensitivity analysis of a modelFind the MLE of a GLMConstructing a 95% Confidence Interval (using output from r-studio)Why use the log_e function as link function for Poisson data in a GLM modelAnalysis of model fitDefinition of the fitted values of a GLM?













0












$begingroup$


I am working with a dataset from a job center that specialises in finding work placements for individuals with a criminal record.



There are 2 continuous factors (age, number of pre-convictions) and 4 discrete factors (placement, re-convicted, age group (grouped into 3 levels) and number of pre-convictions (grouped into 3 levels).



My exploratory analysis (consisting of Pearson's Chi-squared test, confidence regions, box plots and barcharts) suggested a strong relationship between number of pre-convictions and getting re-convicted, also with getting a work placement and getting re-convicted. I also found a weak (non-significant) relationship between age of individuals and getting re-convicted. However when I look at the summary data for the saturated model, the significance of my co-efficients seems to suggest the opposite to my analysis.



Could someone please explain what I am doing wrong? Or is this okay? I figured this model would be a good place to start and it would support my findings. Is this the correct approach for finding a suitable GLM?



Here is an image of the summary data as well as the factors



Thanks!










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$











  • $begingroup$
    Just in case you get no response here, try the statistics site after a while. Don't forget to mention the cross-post here if/when you do.
    $endgroup$
    – Lee David Chung Lin
    Mar 13 at 22:05















0












$begingroup$


I am working with a dataset from a job center that specialises in finding work placements for individuals with a criminal record.



There are 2 continuous factors (age, number of pre-convictions) and 4 discrete factors (placement, re-convicted, age group (grouped into 3 levels) and number of pre-convictions (grouped into 3 levels).



My exploratory analysis (consisting of Pearson's Chi-squared test, confidence regions, box plots and barcharts) suggested a strong relationship between number of pre-convictions and getting re-convicted, also with getting a work placement and getting re-convicted. I also found a weak (non-significant) relationship between age of individuals and getting re-convicted. However when I look at the summary data for the saturated model, the significance of my co-efficients seems to suggest the opposite to my analysis.



Could someone please explain what I am doing wrong? Or is this okay? I figured this model would be a good place to start and it would support my findings. Is this the correct approach for finding a suitable GLM?



Here is an image of the summary data as well as the factors



Thanks!










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$











  • $begingroup$
    Just in case you get no response here, try the statistics site after a while. Don't forget to mention the cross-post here if/when you do.
    $endgroup$
    – Lee David Chung Lin
    Mar 13 at 22:05













0












0








0





$begingroup$


I am working with a dataset from a job center that specialises in finding work placements for individuals with a criminal record.



There are 2 continuous factors (age, number of pre-convictions) and 4 discrete factors (placement, re-convicted, age group (grouped into 3 levels) and number of pre-convictions (grouped into 3 levels).



My exploratory analysis (consisting of Pearson's Chi-squared test, confidence regions, box plots and barcharts) suggested a strong relationship between number of pre-convictions and getting re-convicted, also with getting a work placement and getting re-convicted. I also found a weak (non-significant) relationship between age of individuals and getting re-convicted. However when I look at the summary data for the saturated model, the significance of my co-efficients seems to suggest the opposite to my analysis.



Could someone please explain what I am doing wrong? Or is this okay? I figured this model would be a good place to start and it would support my findings. Is this the correct approach for finding a suitable GLM?



Here is an image of the summary data as well as the factors



Thanks!










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$




I am working with a dataset from a job center that specialises in finding work placements for individuals with a criminal record.



There are 2 continuous factors (age, number of pre-convictions) and 4 discrete factors (placement, re-convicted, age group (grouped into 3 levels) and number of pre-convictions (grouped into 3 levels).



My exploratory analysis (consisting of Pearson's Chi-squared test, confidence regions, box plots and barcharts) suggested a strong relationship between number of pre-convictions and getting re-convicted, also with getting a work placement and getting re-convicted. I also found a weak (non-significant) relationship between age of individuals and getting re-convicted. However when I look at the summary data for the saturated model, the significance of my co-efficients seems to suggest the opposite to my analysis.



Could someone please explain what I am doing wrong? Or is this okay? I figured this model would be a good place to start and it would support my findings. Is this the correct approach for finding a suitable GLM?



Here is an image of the summary data as well as the factors



Thanks!







statistics






share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question











share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question










asked Mar 13 at 18:54









user553480user553480

62




62











  • $begingroup$
    Just in case you get no response here, try the statistics site after a while. Don't forget to mention the cross-post here if/when you do.
    $endgroup$
    – Lee David Chung Lin
    Mar 13 at 22:05
















  • $begingroup$
    Just in case you get no response here, try the statistics site after a while. Don't forget to mention the cross-post here if/when you do.
    $endgroup$
    – Lee David Chung Lin
    Mar 13 at 22:05















$begingroup$
Just in case you get no response here, try the statistics site after a while. Don't forget to mention the cross-post here if/when you do.
$endgroup$
– Lee David Chung Lin
Mar 13 at 22:05




$begingroup$
Just in case you get no response here, try the statistics site after a while. Don't forget to mention the cross-post here if/when you do.
$endgroup$
– Lee David Chung Lin
Mar 13 at 22:05










0






active

oldest

votes











Your Answer





StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
);
);
, "mathjax-editing");

StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);

else
createEditor();

);

function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);



);













draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3147025%2fglm-model-not-corresponding-to-exploratory-analysis-r-studio%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























0






active

oldest

votes








0






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes















draft saved

draft discarded
















































Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid


  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3147025%2fglm-model-not-corresponding-to-exploratory-analysis-r-studio%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

How should I support this large drywall patch? Planned maintenance scheduled April 23, 2019 at 00:00UTC (8:00pm US/Eastern) Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara Unicorn Meta Zoo #1: Why another podcast?How do I cover large gaps in drywall?How do I keep drywall around a patch from crumbling?Can I glue a second layer of drywall?How to patch long strip on drywall?Large drywall patch: how to avoid bulging seams?Drywall Mesh Patch vs. Bulge? To remove or not to remove?How to fix this drywall job?Prep drywall before backsplashWhat's the best way to fix this horrible drywall patch job?Drywall patching using 3M Patch Plus Primer

random experiment with two different functions on unit interval Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara Planned maintenance scheduled April 23, 2019 at 00:00UTC (8:00pm US/Eastern)Random variable and probability space notionsRandom Walk with EdgesFinding functions where the increase over a random interval is Poisson distributedNumber of days until dayCan an observed event in fact be of zero probability?Unit random processmodels of coins and uniform distributionHow to get the number of successes given $n$ trials , probability $P$ and a random variable $X$Absorbing Markov chain in a computer. Is “almost every” turned into always convergence in computer executions?Stopped random walk is not uniformly integrable

Lowndes Grove History Architecture References Navigation menu32°48′6″N 79°57′58″W / 32.80167°N 79.96611°W / 32.80167; -79.9661132°48′6″N 79°57′58″W / 32.80167°N 79.96611°W / 32.80167; -79.9661178002500"National Register Information System"Historic houses of South Carolina"Lowndes Grove""+32° 48' 6.00", −79° 57' 58.00""Lowndes Grove, Charleston County (260 St. Margaret St., Charleston)""Lowndes Grove"The Charleston ExpositionIt Happened in South Carolina"Lowndes Grove (House), Saint Margaret Street & Sixth Avenue, Charleston, Charleston County, SC(Photographs)"Plantations of the Carolina Low Countrye