Weak Tangent Problem - Reconciling Two ApproachesWhy is the derivative the tangent vector?Parametrized curve tangent to a lineDefinition of strong tangent.Weak tangent but not a strong tangentClosed Smooth Curve with Curvature 1 is a CircleWhat is the rigorous formal definition of the “limit position” of a line with variable parametersCan a “not strong tangent” trace admit a $C^infty$ curve parameterization?Weak tangent vs. Strong tangentWhen to use different formulas to find the slope of a tangent lineConfusion about a tangent line approaching an asymptote

Writing in a Christian voice

What is this high flying aircraft over Pennsylvania?

Highest stage count that are used one right after the other?

Why didn't Voldemort know what Grindelwald looked like?

Can a Knock spell open the door to Mordenkainen's Magnificent Mansion?

What do the positive and negative (+/-) transmit and receive pins mean on Ethernet cables?

Not hide and seek

Do I have to take mana from my deck or hand when tapping this card?

Is there a distance limit for minecart tracks?

What is the tangent at a sharp point on a curve?

What is the period/term used describe Giuseppe Arcimboldo's style of painting?

How do I lift the insulation blower into the attic?

Derivative of an interpolated function

What should be the ideal length of sentences in a blog post for ease of reading?

How can I, as DM, avoid the Conga Line of Death occurring when implementing some form of flanking rule?

Friend wants my recommendation but I don't want to give it to him

Recursively move files within sub directories

Is there a POSIX way to shutdown a UNIX machine?

Trouble reading roman numeral notation with flats

Did I make a mistake by ccing email to boss to others?

Connection Between Knot Theory and Number Theory

Why does a 97 / 92 key piano exist by Bosendorfer?

Mortal danger in mid-grade literature

Taking the numerator and the denominator



Weak Tangent Problem - Reconciling Two Approaches


Why is the derivative the tangent vector?Parametrized curve tangent to a lineDefinition of strong tangent.Weak tangent but not a strong tangentClosed Smooth Curve with Curvature 1 is a CircleWhat is the rigorous formal definition of the “limit position” of a line with variable parametersCan a “not strong tangent” trace admit a $C^infty$ curve parameterization?Weak tangent vs. Strong tangentWhen to use different formulas to find the slope of a tangent lineConfusion about a tangent line approaching an asymptote













0












$begingroup$


The problem below is given in Do Carmo's Differential Geometry of Curves and Surfaces.



enter image description here



My question is regarding part (a).



Let us first show $alpha:IrightarrowmathbbR^3$ has weak tangent at $t_0=0$.



The line determined by $alpha(h)$ and $alpha(0)$ is given by



$$ell(s)=alpha(0)+s(alpha(h)-alpha(0)).$$ That is,



$$ell(s)=(0,0)+s(h^3,h^2).$$



Taking the limit as $hrightarrow 0$,



$$lim_hrightarrow0ell(s)=(0,0)+s(0,0).$$



Now, I'm not sure what to make of this limit. The defintion of weak tangent requires $ell$ have a unique limit position. I suppose this is in fact a limit position, but it does not really define a line, just a point!



Now, I've conducted some further investigation and noticed an alternative more satisfactory solution exists.



Rather than consider the point-direction form of the particular line, consider its slope. Let $alpha(t)=(x(t),y(t))$



$$lim_hrightarrow0fracy(h)-y(0)x(h)-x(0)=lim_hrightarrow0frach^2h^3.$$



This limit is clearly undefined as the slope is either $+infty$ or $-infty$. This means the slope is vertical, so we have a vertical line at $t=0$. Thus, due to the existence of a limiting line, we conclude there is a weak tangent at $t=0$.



How do we reconcile the two answers? The two approaches are both equally sound (in my view anyway, I could be wrong). The second approach yields a nice limiting line, whereas the first yields a point.



I think, as the parameter $srightarrowinfty$, $(0,0)+s(0,0)$ is an indeterminant form due to the multiplication of an infinite quantity by 0, but I cannot think of how to resolve this issue analytically.










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$











  • $begingroup$
    "Now, I'm not sure what to make of this limit." You're trying to take the limit of the points separately and draw the line between those. You run into something much like a $frac 00$ problem this way. Instead, try to express, for any $h$, the line between $alpha(0)$ and $alpha(h)$ as, for instance, $y=ax+b$. Then take the limit of that as $hto0$.
    $endgroup$
    – Arthur
    Mar 13 at 18:29
















0












$begingroup$


The problem below is given in Do Carmo's Differential Geometry of Curves and Surfaces.



enter image description here



My question is regarding part (a).



Let us first show $alpha:IrightarrowmathbbR^3$ has weak tangent at $t_0=0$.



The line determined by $alpha(h)$ and $alpha(0)$ is given by



$$ell(s)=alpha(0)+s(alpha(h)-alpha(0)).$$ That is,



$$ell(s)=(0,0)+s(h^3,h^2).$$



Taking the limit as $hrightarrow 0$,



$$lim_hrightarrow0ell(s)=(0,0)+s(0,0).$$



Now, I'm not sure what to make of this limit. The defintion of weak tangent requires $ell$ have a unique limit position. I suppose this is in fact a limit position, but it does not really define a line, just a point!



Now, I've conducted some further investigation and noticed an alternative more satisfactory solution exists.



Rather than consider the point-direction form of the particular line, consider its slope. Let $alpha(t)=(x(t),y(t))$



$$lim_hrightarrow0fracy(h)-y(0)x(h)-x(0)=lim_hrightarrow0frach^2h^3.$$



This limit is clearly undefined as the slope is either $+infty$ or $-infty$. This means the slope is vertical, so we have a vertical line at $t=0$. Thus, due to the existence of a limiting line, we conclude there is a weak tangent at $t=0$.



How do we reconcile the two answers? The two approaches are both equally sound (in my view anyway, I could be wrong). The second approach yields a nice limiting line, whereas the first yields a point.



I think, as the parameter $srightarrowinfty$, $(0,0)+s(0,0)$ is an indeterminant form due to the multiplication of an infinite quantity by 0, but I cannot think of how to resolve this issue analytically.










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$











  • $begingroup$
    "Now, I'm not sure what to make of this limit." You're trying to take the limit of the points separately and draw the line between those. You run into something much like a $frac 00$ problem this way. Instead, try to express, for any $h$, the line between $alpha(0)$ and $alpha(h)$ as, for instance, $y=ax+b$. Then take the limit of that as $hto0$.
    $endgroup$
    – Arthur
    Mar 13 at 18:29














0












0








0





$begingroup$


The problem below is given in Do Carmo's Differential Geometry of Curves and Surfaces.



enter image description here



My question is regarding part (a).



Let us first show $alpha:IrightarrowmathbbR^3$ has weak tangent at $t_0=0$.



The line determined by $alpha(h)$ and $alpha(0)$ is given by



$$ell(s)=alpha(0)+s(alpha(h)-alpha(0)).$$ That is,



$$ell(s)=(0,0)+s(h^3,h^2).$$



Taking the limit as $hrightarrow 0$,



$$lim_hrightarrow0ell(s)=(0,0)+s(0,0).$$



Now, I'm not sure what to make of this limit. The defintion of weak tangent requires $ell$ have a unique limit position. I suppose this is in fact a limit position, but it does not really define a line, just a point!



Now, I've conducted some further investigation and noticed an alternative more satisfactory solution exists.



Rather than consider the point-direction form of the particular line, consider its slope. Let $alpha(t)=(x(t),y(t))$



$$lim_hrightarrow0fracy(h)-y(0)x(h)-x(0)=lim_hrightarrow0frach^2h^3.$$



This limit is clearly undefined as the slope is either $+infty$ or $-infty$. This means the slope is vertical, so we have a vertical line at $t=0$. Thus, due to the existence of a limiting line, we conclude there is a weak tangent at $t=0$.



How do we reconcile the two answers? The two approaches are both equally sound (in my view anyway, I could be wrong). The second approach yields a nice limiting line, whereas the first yields a point.



I think, as the parameter $srightarrowinfty$, $(0,0)+s(0,0)$ is an indeterminant form due to the multiplication of an infinite quantity by 0, but I cannot think of how to resolve this issue analytically.










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$




The problem below is given in Do Carmo's Differential Geometry of Curves and Surfaces.



enter image description here



My question is regarding part (a).



Let us first show $alpha:IrightarrowmathbbR^3$ has weak tangent at $t_0=0$.



The line determined by $alpha(h)$ and $alpha(0)$ is given by



$$ell(s)=alpha(0)+s(alpha(h)-alpha(0)).$$ That is,



$$ell(s)=(0,0)+s(h^3,h^2).$$



Taking the limit as $hrightarrow 0$,



$$lim_hrightarrow0ell(s)=(0,0)+s(0,0).$$



Now, I'm not sure what to make of this limit. The defintion of weak tangent requires $ell$ have a unique limit position. I suppose this is in fact a limit position, but it does not really define a line, just a point!



Now, I've conducted some further investigation and noticed an alternative more satisfactory solution exists.



Rather than consider the point-direction form of the particular line, consider its slope. Let $alpha(t)=(x(t),y(t))$



$$lim_hrightarrow0fracy(h)-y(0)x(h)-x(0)=lim_hrightarrow0frach^2h^3.$$



This limit is clearly undefined as the slope is either $+infty$ or $-infty$. This means the slope is vertical, so we have a vertical line at $t=0$. Thus, due to the existence of a limiting line, we conclude there is a weak tangent at $t=0$.



How do we reconcile the two answers? The two approaches are both equally sound (in my view anyway, I could be wrong). The second approach yields a nice limiting line, whereas the first yields a point.



I think, as the parameter $srightarrowinfty$, $(0,0)+s(0,0)$ is an indeterminant form due to the multiplication of an infinite quantity by 0, but I cannot think of how to resolve this issue analytically.







differential-geometry curves tangent-line






share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question











share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question










asked Mar 13 at 18:16









SaruSaru

1097




1097











  • $begingroup$
    "Now, I'm not sure what to make of this limit." You're trying to take the limit of the points separately and draw the line between those. You run into something much like a $frac 00$ problem this way. Instead, try to express, for any $h$, the line between $alpha(0)$ and $alpha(h)$ as, for instance, $y=ax+b$. Then take the limit of that as $hto0$.
    $endgroup$
    – Arthur
    Mar 13 at 18:29

















  • $begingroup$
    "Now, I'm not sure what to make of this limit." You're trying to take the limit of the points separately and draw the line between those. You run into something much like a $frac 00$ problem this way. Instead, try to express, for any $h$, the line between $alpha(0)$ and $alpha(h)$ as, for instance, $y=ax+b$. Then take the limit of that as $hto0$.
    $endgroup$
    – Arthur
    Mar 13 at 18:29
















$begingroup$
"Now, I'm not sure what to make of this limit." You're trying to take the limit of the points separately and draw the line between those. You run into something much like a $frac 00$ problem this way. Instead, try to express, for any $h$, the line between $alpha(0)$ and $alpha(h)$ as, for instance, $y=ax+b$. Then take the limit of that as $hto0$.
$endgroup$
– Arthur
Mar 13 at 18:29





$begingroup$
"Now, I'm not sure what to make of this limit." You're trying to take the limit of the points separately and draw the line between those. You run into something much like a $frac 00$ problem this way. Instead, try to express, for any $h$, the line between $alpha(0)$ and $alpha(h)$ as, for instance, $y=ax+b$. Then take the limit of that as $hto0$.
$endgroup$
– Arthur
Mar 13 at 18:29











0






active

oldest

votes











Your Answer





StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
);
);
, "mathjax-editing");

StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);

else
createEditor();

);

function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);



);













draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3146967%2fweak-tangent-problem-reconciling-two-approaches%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























0






active

oldest

votes








0






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes















draft saved

draft discarded
















































Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid


  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3146967%2fweak-tangent-problem-reconciling-two-approaches%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

How should I support this large drywall patch? Planned maintenance scheduled April 23, 2019 at 00:00UTC (8:00pm US/Eastern) Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara Unicorn Meta Zoo #1: Why another podcast?How do I cover large gaps in drywall?How do I keep drywall around a patch from crumbling?Can I glue a second layer of drywall?How to patch long strip on drywall?Large drywall patch: how to avoid bulging seams?Drywall Mesh Patch vs. Bulge? To remove or not to remove?How to fix this drywall job?Prep drywall before backsplashWhat's the best way to fix this horrible drywall patch job?Drywall patching using 3M Patch Plus Primer

random experiment with two different functions on unit interval Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara Planned maintenance scheduled April 23, 2019 at 00:00UTC (8:00pm US/Eastern)Random variable and probability space notionsRandom Walk with EdgesFinding functions where the increase over a random interval is Poisson distributedNumber of days until dayCan an observed event in fact be of zero probability?Unit random processmodels of coins and uniform distributionHow to get the number of successes given $n$ trials , probability $P$ and a random variable $X$Absorbing Markov chain in a computer. Is “almost every” turned into always convergence in computer executions?Stopped random walk is not uniformly integrable

Lowndes Grove History Architecture References Navigation menu32°48′6″N 79°57′58″W / 32.80167°N 79.96611°W / 32.80167; -79.9661132°48′6″N 79°57′58″W / 32.80167°N 79.96611°W / 32.80167; -79.9661178002500"National Register Information System"Historic houses of South Carolina"Lowndes Grove""+32° 48' 6.00", −79° 57' 58.00""Lowndes Grove, Charleston County (260 St. Margaret St., Charleston)""Lowndes Grove"The Charleston ExpositionIt Happened in South Carolina"Lowndes Grove (House), Saint Margaret Street & Sixth Avenue, Charleston, Charleston County, SC(Photographs)"Plantations of the Carolina Low Countrye