Real Analysis Methodologies to Prove $-int_x^infty fraccos(t)t,dt=gamma+log(x)+int_0^x fraccos(t)-1t,dt$ for $x>0$cosine integralEvaluating the integral $int_0^infty fracx sin rx a^2+x^2 dx$ using only real analysisIntegral $int_0^infty fracln cos^2 xx^2dx=-pi$Double Integral $int_0^infty int_0^infty fraclog x log ysqrt xycos(x+y),dx,dy=(gamma+2log 2)pi^2$Help with the integral $int_0^inftyfracx^yGamma(y)cos(y)dy$Real-Analysis Methods to Evaluate $int_0^infty fracx^a1+x^2,dx$, $|a|<1$.Alternative approaches to showing that $gamma=int_0^infty left(frac11+x^a-frac1e^xright),frac1x,dx$, $a>0$Real Analysis Methodologies to show $gamma =2int_0^infty fraccos(x^2)-cos(x)x,dx$Prove that log Gamma is real analyticHow to prove $int_0^+infty fracsin(x)x^s = cos(fracpi s2) Gamma(1-s)$prove $int_0^infty fraclog^2(x)x^2+1mathrm dx=fracpi^38$ with real methods

What is this high flying aircraft over Pennsylvania?

How do you say "Trust your struggle." in French?

A seasonal riddle

How can I, as DM, avoid the Conga Line of Death occurring when implementing some form of flanking rule?

How do I prevent inappropriate ads from appearing in my game?

Do I have to take mana from my deck or hand when tapping this card?

Extract substring according to regexp with sed or grep

PTIJ: Which Dr. Seuss books should one obtain?

Capacitor electron flow

Why is implicit conversion not ambiguous for non-primitive types?

C++ lambda syntax

What properties make a magic weapon befit a Rogue more than a DEX-based Fighter?

Started in 1987 vs. Starting in 1987

Output visual diagram of picture

Unfrosted light bulb

Writing in a Christian voice

Pre-Employment Background Check With Consent For Future Checks

Mortal danger in mid-grade literature

Do people actually use the word "kaputt" in conversation?

Relations between homogeneous polynomials

Checking @@ROWCOUNT failing

Why is participating in the European Parliamentary elections used as a threat?

Is this saw blade faulty?

Travelling in US for more than 90 days



Real Analysis Methodologies to Prove $-int_x^infty fraccos(t)t,dt=gamma+log(x)+int_0^x fraccos(t)-1t,dt$ for $x>0$


cosine integralEvaluating the integral $int_0^infty fracx sin rx a^2+x^2 dx$ using only real analysisIntegral $int_0^infty fracln cos^2 xx^2dx=-pi$Double Integral $int_0^infty int_0^infty fraclog x log ysqrt xycos(x+y),dx,dy=(gamma+2log 2)pi^2$Help with the integral $int_0^inftyfracx^yGamma(y)cos(y)dy$Real-Analysis Methods to Evaluate $int_0^infty fracx^a1+x^2,dx$, $|a|<1$.Alternative approaches to showing that $gamma=int_0^infty left(frac11+x^a-frac1e^xright),frac1x,dx$, $a>0$Real Analysis Methodologies to show $gamma =2int_0^infty fraccos(x^2)-cos(x)x,dx$Prove that log Gamma is real analyticHow to prove $int_0^+infty fracsin(x)x^s = cos(fracpi s2) Gamma(1-s)$prove $int_0^infty fraclog^2(x)x^2+1mathrm dx=fracpi^38$ with real methods













1












$begingroup$


In this question, the OP asked to prove that $-int_x^infty fraccos(t)t,dt=gamma+log(x)+int_0^x fraccos(t)-1t,dt$, where $gamma $ is the Euler-Mascheroni constant. However, the two posted answers are incomplete and seem unsatisfactory.




Using Complex Anaysis



One can show for $x>0$ that $-int_x^infty fraccos(t)t,dt=gamma+log(x)+int_0^x fraccos(t)-1t,dt$ using contour integration. To wit, Cauchy's Integral Theorem guarantees that



$$beginalign
0&=oint_C frace^izz,dz\\
&=int_epsilon^R frace^ixx,dx +int_0^pi/2frace^iRe^iphiRe^iphi,iRe^iphi,dphi+int_R^epsilon frace^-xix,i,dx+int_pi/2^0 frace^iepsilon e^iphiepsilon e^iphi,iepsilon e^iphi,dphi\\
&=int_epsilon^R frace^ixx,dx -int_epsilon^R frace^-xx,dx-ifracpi2+O(epsilon)+Oleft(frac1Rright)tag1
endalign$$



whence after taking the real part of both sides of $(1$ and integrating by parts the integral $int_epsilon^R frace^-xx,dx$ with $u=e^-x$ and $v=log(x)$, we find



$$beginalign-int_x^R fraccos(x')x',dx'&=log(x)-int_epsilon^R e^-xlog(x),dx+int_epsilon^xfraccos(x')-1x',dx'\\
&-log(epsilon) -e^-Rlog(R)+e^-epsilonlog(epsilon)+Oleft(frac1Rright)+O(epsilon)tag2
endalign$$



Letting $Rtoinfty$ and $epsilonto 0$ in $(2)$ yields the sought relationship.




Using Real Analysis
Alternatively, we can use either the Laplace Transform or "Feynman's Trick" to show that



$$int_0^infty fraccos(x)-e^-xx,dx=int_0^infty left(fracxx^2+1-frac1x+1right)=0tag3$$



Starting with $(3)$, is tantamount to starting with the real part of $(1)$ and we are done.





So, what are other ways to prove the coveted relationship using real analysis tools only?











share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$
















    1












    $begingroup$


    In this question, the OP asked to prove that $-int_x^infty fraccos(t)t,dt=gamma+log(x)+int_0^x fraccos(t)-1t,dt$, where $gamma $ is the Euler-Mascheroni constant. However, the two posted answers are incomplete and seem unsatisfactory.




    Using Complex Anaysis



    One can show for $x>0$ that $-int_x^infty fraccos(t)t,dt=gamma+log(x)+int_0^x fraccos(t)-1t,dt$ using contour integration. To wit, Cauchy's Integral Theorem guarantees that



    $$beginalign
    0&=oint_C frace^izz,dz\\
    &=int_epsilon^R frace^ixx,dx +int_0^pi/2frace^iRe^iphiRe^iphi,iRe^iphi,dphi+int_R^epsilon frace^-xix,i,dx+int_pi/2^0 frace^iepsilon e^iphiepsilon e^iphi,iepsilon e^iphi,dphi\\
    &=int_epsilon^R frace^ixx,dx -int_epsilon^R frace^-xx,dx-ifracpi2+O(epsilon)+Oleft(frac1Rright)tag1
    endalign$$



    whence after taking the real part of both sides of $(1$ and integrating by parts the integral $int_epsilon^R frace^-xx,dx$ with $u=e^-x$ and $v=log(x)$, we find



    $$beginalign-int_x^R fraccos(x')x',dx'&=log(x)-int_epsilon^R e^-xlog(x),dx+int_epsilon^xfraccos(x')-1x',dx'\\
    &-log(epsilon) -e^-Rlog(R)+e^-epsilonlog(epsilon)+Oleft(frac1Rright)+O(epsilon)tag2
    endalign$$



    Letting $Rtoinfty$ and $epsilonto 0$ in $(2)$ yields the sought relationship.




    Using Real Analysis
    Alternatively, we can use either the Laplace Transform or "Feynman's Trick" to show that



    $$int_0^infty fraccos(x)-e^-xx,dx=int_0^infty left(fracxx^2+1-frac1x+1right)=0tag3$$



    Starting with $(3)$, is tantamount to starting with the real part of $(1)$ and we are done.





    So, what are other ways to prove the coveted relationship using real analysis tools only?











    share|cite|improve this question











    $endgroup$














      1












      1








      1


      1



      $begingroup$


      In this question, the OP asked to prove that $-int_x^infty fraccos(t)t,dt=gamma+log(x)+int_0^x fraccos(t)-1t,dt$, where $gamma $ is the Euler-Mascheroni constant. However, the two posted answers are incomplete and seem unsatisfactory.




      Using Complex Anaysis



      One can show for $x>0$ that $-int_x^infty fraccos(t)t,dt=gamma+log(x)+int_0^x fraccos(t)-1t,dt$ using contour integration. To wit, Cauchy's Integral Theorem guarantees that



      $$beginalign
      0&=oint_C frace^izz,dz\\
      &=int_epsilon^R frace^ixx,dx +int_0^pi/2frace^iRe^iphiRe^iphi,iRe^iphi,dphi+int_R^epsilon frace^-xix,i,dx+int_pi/2^0 frace^iepsilon e^iphiepsilon e^iphi,iepsilon e^iphi,dphi\\
      &=int_epsilon^R frace^ixx,dx -int_epsilon^R frace^-xx,dx-ifracpi2+O(epsilon)+Oleft(frac1Rright)tag1
      endalign$$



      whence after taking the real part of both sides of $(1$ and integrating by parts the integral $int_epsilon^R frace^-xx,dx$ with $u=e^-x$ and $v=log(x)$, we find



      $$beginalign-int_x^R fraccos(x')x',dx'&=log(x)-int_epsilon^R e^-xlog(x),dx+int_epsilon^xfraccos(x')-1x',dx'\\
      &-log(epsilon) -e^-Rlog(R)+e^-epsilonlog(epsilon)+Oleft(frac1Rright)+O(epsilon)tag2
      endalign$$



      Letting $Rtoinfty$ and $epsilonto 0$ in $(2)$ yields the sought relationship.




      Using Real Analysis
      Alternatively, we can use either the Laplace Transform or "Feynman's Trick" to show that



      $$int_0^infty fraccos(x)-e^-xx,dx=int_0^infty left(fracxx^2+1-frac1x+1right)=0tag3$$



      Starting with $(3)$, is tantamount to starting with the real part of $(1)$ and we are done.





      So, what are other ways to prove the coveted relationship using real analysis tools only?











      share|cite|improve this question











      $endgroup$




      In this question, the OP asked to prove that $-int_x^infty fraccos(t)t,dt=gamma+log(x)+int_0^x fraccos(t)-1t,dt$, where $gamma $ is the Euler-Mascheroni constant. However, the two posted answers are incomplete and seem unsatisfactory.




      Using Complex Anaysis



      One can show for $x>0$ that $-int_x^infty fraccos(t)t,dt=gamma+log(x)+int_0^x fraccos(t)-1t,dt$ using contour integration. To wit, Cauchy's Integral Theorem guarantees that



      $$beginalign
      0&=oint_C frace^izz,dz\\
      &=int_epsilon^R frace^ixx,dx +int_0^pi/2frace^iRe^iphiRe^iphi,iRe^iphi,dphi+int_R^epsilon frace^-xix,i,dx+int_pi/2^0 frace^iepsilon e^iphiepsilon e^iphi,iepsilon e^iphi,dphi\\
      &=int_epsilon^R frace^ixx,dx -int_epsilon^R frace^-xx,dx-ifracpi2+O(epsilon)+Oleft(frac1Rright)tag1
      endalign$$



      whence after taking the real part of both sides of $(1$ and integrating by parts the integral $int_epsilon^R frace^-xx,dx$ with $u=e^-x$ and $v=log(x)$, we find



      $$beginalign-int_x^R fraccos(x')x',dx'&=log(x)-int_epsilon^R e^-xlog(x),dx+int_epsilon^xfraccos(x')-1x',dx'\\
      &-log(epsilon) -e^-Rlog(R)+e^-epsilonlog(epsilon)+Oleft(frac1Rright)+O(epsilon)tag2
      endalign$$



      Letting $Rtoinfty$ and $epsilonto 0$ in $(2)$ yields the sought relationship.




      Using Real Analysis
      Alternatively, we can use either the Laplace Transform or "Feynman's Trick" to show that



      $$int_0^infty fraccos(x)-e^-xx,dx=int_0^infty left(fracxx^2+1-frac1x+1right)=0tag3$$



      Starting with $(3)$, is tantamount to starting with the real part of $(1)$ and we are done.





      So, what are other ways to prove the coveted relationship using real analysis tools only?








      real-analysis special-functions






      share|cite|improve this question















      share|cite|improve this question













      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question








      edited 2 days ago







      Mark Viola

















      asked Feb 28 at 5:09









      Mark ViolaMark Viola

      133k1278176




      133k1278176




















          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          0












          $begingroup$

          Note that for each $x>0$, the improper integral $int_x^inftyfraccos(t)tdt$
          converges conditionally (in the sense that $lim_Arightarrowinftyint_x^Afraccos(t)tdt$
          exists but $lim_Arightarrowinftyint_x^Aleft|fraccos(t)tright|dt=infty$).
          Define $F:(0,infty)rightarrowmathbbR$ by $F(x)=int_x^inftyfraccos(t)tdt$.
          Note that we still have $F'(x)=-fraccos(x)x$. For,
          begineqnarray*
          F'(x) & = & lim_hrightarrow0fracint_x+h^inftyfraccos(t)tdt-int_x^inftyfraccos(t)tdth\
          & = & -lim_hrightarrow0fracint_x^x+hfraccos(t)tdth\
          & = & -fraccos(x)x.
          endeqnarray*



          On the other hand, $0$ in the integral $int_0^xfraccos(t)-1tdt$
          is a removable singularity. For $tneq0$, we have
          begineqnarray*
          fraccos(t)-1t & = & frac(1-frac12!t^2+frac14!t^4-cdots)-1t\
          & = & -frac12!t+frac14!t^3-frac16!t^5+cdots.
          endeqnarray*

          Define $phi:mathbbRrightarrowmathbbR$ by $phi(t)=-frac12!t+frac14!t^3-frac16!t^5+cdots$.
          It can be proved that the power series converges everywhere (using
          root-test), and hence $phi$ is an analytic function. Therefore $int_0^xfraccos(t)-1tdt=int_0^xphi(t)dt$.



          Now $fracddxint_0^xfraccos(t)-1tdt=fraccos(x)-1x$.



          Finally, define $G:(0,infty)rightarrowmathbbR$ by
          $$
          G(x)=int_x^inftyfraccos(t)tdt-left[ln(x)+int_0^xfraccos(t)-1tdtright].
          $$

          Then $G$ is differentiable and $G'(x)=-fraccos(x)x-frac1x-fraccos(x)-1x=0$.
          This shows that $G$ is a constant function.






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$












          • $begingroup$
            You have not evaluated the constant, which renders this development incomplete. But I appreciate your attempt.
            $endgroup$
            – Mark Viola
            Mar 16 at 16:49











          • $begingroup$
            I thought that you just asked to prove that there exists a constant $gamma$ such that ... You did not ask explicitly "compute the value of $gamma$".
            $endgroup$
            – Danny Pak-Keung Chan
            Mar 16 at 16:59











          • $begingroup$
            Read the question of the OP. "Real Analysis Methodologies to Prove $-int_x^infty fraccos(t)t,dt=gamma+log(x)+int_0^x fraccos(t)-1t,dt$ for $x>0$." The constant $gamma$ is explicitly written. How did you infer that I was interested in something considerably less than that. Furthermore, in the body of the question, I actually show two derivations that include $gamma$.
            $endgroup$
            – Mark Viola
            Mar 16 at 17:08











          • $begingroup$
            I interpret that line as "Prove that there exists $gamma$ such that ... for all $x>0$.
            $endgroup$
            – Danny Pak-Keung Chan
            Mar 16 at 17:12






          • 1




            $begingroup$
            You should state explicitly: Compute the value $gamma$ and express it in close-form. Otherwise, I can write $gamma = G(1) = int_1^infty fraccos tt dt - int_0^1 fraccos t -1t dt$.
            $endgroup$
            – Danny Pak-Keung Chan
            Mar 16 at 17:17











          Your Answer





          StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
          return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
          StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
          StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
          );
          );
          , "mathjax-editing");

          StackExchange.ready(function()
          var channelOptions =
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "69"
          ;
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
          createEditor();
          );

          else
          createEditor();

          );

          function createEditor()
          StackExchange.prepareEditor(
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
          convertImagesToLinks: true,
          noModals: true,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: 10,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          imageUploader:
          brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
          contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
          allowUrls: true
          ,
          noCode: true, onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          );



          );













          draft saved

          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function ()
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3129759%2freal-analysis-methodologies-to-prove-int-x-infty-frac-costt-dt-gamm%23new-answer', 'question_page');

          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown

























          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes








          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes









          0












          $begingroup$

          Note that for each $x>0$, the improper integral $int_x^inftyfraccos(t)tdt$
          converges conditionally (in the sense that $lim_Arightarrowinftyint_x^Afraccos(t)tdt$
          exists but $lim_Arightarrowinftyint_x^Aleft|fraccos(t)tright|dt=infty$).
          Define $F:(0,infty)rightarrowmathbbR$ by $F(x)=int_x^inftyfraccos(t)tdt$.
          Note that we still have $F'(x)=-fraccos(x)x$. For,
          begineqnarray*
          F'(x) & = & lim_hrightarrow0fracint_x+h^inftyfraccos(t)tdt-int_x^inftyfraccos(t)tdth\
          & = & -lim_hrightarrow0fracint_x^x+hfraccos(t)tdth\
          & = & -fraccos(x)x.
          endeqnarray*



          On the other hand, $0$ in the integral $int_0^xfraccos(t)-1tdt$
          is a removable singularity. For $tneq0$, we have
          begineqnarray*
          fraccos(t)-1t & = & frac(1-frac12!t^2+frac14!t^4-cdots)-1t\
          & = & -frac12!t+frac14!t^3-frac16!t^5+cdots.
          endeqnarray*

          Define $phi:mathbbRrightarrowmathbbR$ by $phi(t)=-frac12!t+frac14!t^3-frac16!t^5+cdots$.
          It can be proved that the power series converges everywhere (using
          root-test), and hence $phi$ is an analytic function. Therefore $int_0^xfraccos(t)-1tdt=int_0^xphi(t)dt$.



          Now $fracddxint_0^xfraccos(t)-1tdt=fraccos(x)-1x$.



          Finally, define $G:(0,infty)rightarrowmathbbR$ by
          $$
          G(x)=int_x^inftyfraccos(t)tdt-left[ln(x)+int_0^xfraccos(t)-1tdtright].
          $$

          Then $G$ is differentiable and $G'(x)=-fraccos(x)x-frac1x-fraccos(x)-1x=0$.
          This shows that $G$ is a constant function.






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$












          • $begingroup$
            You have not evaluated the constant, which renders this development incomplete. But I appreciate your attempt.
            $endgroup$
            – Mark Viola
            Mar 16 at 16:49











          • $begingroup$
            I thought that you just asked to prove that there exists a constant $gamma$ such that ... You did not ask explicitly "compute the value of $gamma$".
            $endgroup$
            – Danny Pak-Keung Chan
            Mar 16 at 16:59











          • $begingroup$
            Read the question of the OP. "Real Analysis Methodologies to Prove $-int_x^infty fraccos(t)t,dt=gamma+log(x)+int_0^x fraccos(t)-1t,dt$ for $x>0$." The constant $gamma$ is explicitly written. How did you infer that I was interested in something considerably less than that. Furthermore, in the body of the question, I actually show two derivations that include $gamma$.
            $endgroup$
            – Mark Viola
            Mar 16 at 17:08











          • $begingroup$
            I interpret that line as "Prove that there exists $gamma$ such that ... for all $x>0$.
            $endgroup$
            – Danny Pak-Keung Chan
            Mar 16 at 17:12






          • 1




            $begingroup$
            You should state explicitly: Compute the value $gamma$ and express it in close-form. Otherwise, I can write $gamma = G(1) = int_1^infty fraccos tt dt - int_0^1 fraccos t -1t dt$.
            $endgroup$
            – Danny Pak-Keung Chan
            Mar 16 at 17:17
















          0












          $begingroup$

          Note that for each $x>0$, the improper integral $int_x^inftyfraccos(t)tdt$
          converges conditionally (in the sense that $lim_Arightarrowinftyint_x^Afraccos(t)tdt$
          exists but $lim_Arightarrowinftyint_x^Aleft|fraccos(t)tright|dt=infty$).
          Define $F:(0,infty)rightarrowmathbbR$ by $F(x)=int_x^inftyfraccos(t)tdt$.
          Note that we still have $F'(x)=-fraccos(x)x$. For,
          begineqnarray*
          F'(x) & = & lim_hrightarrow0fracint_x+h^inftyfraccos(t)tdt-int_x^inftyfraccos(t)tdth\
          & = & -lim_hrightarrow0fracint_x^x+hfraccos(t)tdth\
          & = & -fraccos(x)x.
          endeqnarray*



          On the other hand, $0$ in the integral $int_0^xfraccos(t)-1tdt$
          is a removable singularity. For $tneq0$, we have
          begineqnarray*
          fraccos(t)-1t & = & frac(1-frac12!t^2+frac14!t^4-cdots)-1t\
          & = & -frac12!t+frac14!t^3-frac16!t^5+cdots.
          endeqnarray*

          Define $phi:mathbbRrightarrowmathbbR$ by $phi(t)=-frac12!t+frac14!t^3-frac16!t^5+cdots$.
          It can be proved that the power series converges everywhere (using
          root-test), and hence $phi$ is an analytic function. Therefore $int_0^xfraccos(t)-1tdt=int_0^xphi(t)dt$.



          Now $fracddxint_0^xfraccos(t)-1tdt=fraccos(x)-1x$.



          Finally, define $G:(0,infty)rightarrowmathbbR$ by
          $$
          G(x)=int_x^inftyfraccos(t)tdt-left[ln(x)+int_0^xfraccos(t)-1tdtright].
          $$

          Then $G$ is differentiable and $G'(x)=-fraccos(x)x-frac1x-fraccos(x)-1x=0$.
          This shows that $G$ is a constant function.






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$












          • $begingroup$
            You have not evaluated the constant, which renders this development incomplete. But I appreciate your attempt.
            $endgroup$
            – Mark Viola
            Mar 16 at 16:49











          • $begingroup$
            I thought that you just asked to prove that there exists a constant $gamma$ such that ... You did not ask explicitly "compute the value of $gamma$".
            $endgroup$
            – Danny Pak-Keung Chan
            Mar 16 at 16:59











          • $begingroup$
            Read the question of the OP. "Real Analysis Methodologies to Prove $-int_x^infty fraccos(t)t,dt=gamma+log(x)+int_0^x fraccos(t)-1t,dt$ for $x>0$." The constant $gamma$ is explicitly written. How did you infer that I was interested in something considerably less than that. Furthermore, in the body of the question, I actually show two derivations that include $gamma$.
            $endgroup$
            – Mark Viola
            Mar 16 at 17:08











          • $begingroup$
            I interpret that line as "Prove that there exists $gamma$ such that ... for all $x>0$.
            $endgroup$
            – Danny Pak-Keung Chan
            Mar 16 at 17:12






          • 1




            $begingroup$
            You should state explicitly: Compute the value $gamma$ and express it in close-form. Otherwise, I can write $gamma = G(1) = int_1^infty fraccos tt dt - int_0^1 fraccos t -1t dt$.
            $endgroup$
            – Danny Pak-Keung Chan
            Mar 16 at 17:17














          0












          0








          0





          $begingroup$

          Note that for each $x>0$, the improper integral $int_x^inftyfraccos(t)tdt$
          converges conditionally (in the sense that $lim_Arightarrowinftyint_x^Afraccos(t)tdt$
          exists but $lim_Arightarrowinftyint_x^Aleft|fraccos(t)tright|dt=infty$).
          Define $F:(0,infty)rightarrowmathbbR$ by $F(x)=int_x^inftyfraccos(t)tdt$.
          Note that we still have $F'(x)=-fraccos(x)x$. For,
          begineqnarray*
          F'(x) & = & lim_hrightarrow0fracint_x+h^inftyfraccos(t)tdt-int_x^inftyfraccos(t)tdth\
          & = & -lim_hrightarrow0fracint_x^x+hfraccos(t)tdth\
          & = & -fraccos(x)x.
          endeqnarray*



          On the other hand, $0$ in the integral $int_0^xfraccos(t)-1tdt$
          is a removable singularity. For $tneq0$, we have
          begineqnarray*
          fraccos(t)-1t & = & frac(1-frac12!t^2+frac14!t^4-cdots)-1t\
          & = & -frac12!t+frac14!t^3-frac16!t^5+cdots.
          endeqnarray*

          Define $phi:mathbbRrightarrowmathbbR$ by $phi(t)=-frac12!t+frac14!t^3-frac16!t^5+cdots$.
          It can be proved that the power series converges everywhere (using
          root-test), and hence $phi$ is an analytic function. Therefore $int_0^xfraccos(t)-1tdt=int_0^xphi(t)dt$.



          Now $fracddxint_0^xfraccos(t)-1tdt=fraccos(x)-1x$.



          Finally, define $G:(0,infty)rightarrowmathbbR$ by
          $$
          G(x)=int_x^inftyfraccos(t)tdt-left[ln(x)+int_0^xfraccos(t)-1tdtright].
          $$

          Then $G$ is differentiable and $G'(x)=-fraccos(x)x-frac1x-fraccos(x)-1x=0$.
          This shows that $G$ is a constant function.






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$



          Note that for each $x>0$, the improper integral $int_x^inftyfraccos(t)tdt$
          converges conditionally (in the sense that $lim_Arightarrowinftyint_x^Afraccos(t)tdt$
          exists but $lim_Arightarrowinftyint_x^Aleft|fraccos(t)tright|dt=infty$).
          Define $F:(0,infty)rightarrowmathbbR$ by $F(x)=int_x^inftyfraccos(t)tdt$.
          Note that we still have $F'(x)=-fraccos(x)x$. For,
          begineqnarray*
          F'(x) & = & lim_hrightarrow0fracint_x+h^inftyfraccos(t)tdt-int_x^inftyfraccos(t)tdth\
          & = & -lim_hrightarrow0fracint_x^x+hfraccos(t)tdth\
          & = & -fraccos(x)x.
          endeqnarray*



          On the other hand, $0$ in the integral $int_0^xfraccos(t)-1tdt$
          is a removable singularity. For $tneq0$, we have
          begineqnarray*
          fraccos(t)-1t & = & frac(1-frac12!t^2+frac14!t^4-cdots)-1t\
          & = & -frac12!t+frac14!t^3-frac16!t^5+cdots.
          endeqnarray*

          Define $phi:mathbbRrightarrowmathbbR$ by $phi(t)=-frac12!t+frac14!t^3-frac16!t^5+cdots$.
          It can be proved that the power series converges everywhere (using
          root-test), and hence $phi$ is an analytic function. Therefore $int_0^xfraccos(t)-1tdt=int_0^xphi(t)dt$.



          Now $fracddxint_0^xfraccos(t)-1tdt=fraccos(x)-1x$.



          Finally, define $G:(0,infty)rightarrowmathbbR$ by
          $$
          G(x)=int_x^inftyfraccos(t)tdt-left[ln(x)+int_0^xfraccos(t)-1tdtright].
          $$

          Then $G$ is differentiable and $G'(x)=-fraccos(x)x-frac1x-fraccos(x)-1x=0$.
          This shows that $G$ is a constant function.







          share|cite|improve this answer












          share|cite|improve this answer



          share|cite|improve this answer










          answered Mar 16 at 16:28









          Danny Pak-Keung ChanDanny Pak-Keung Chan

          2,50938




          2,50938











          • $begingroup$
            You have not evaluated the constant, which renders this development incomplete. But I appreciate your attempt.
            $endgroup$
            – Mark Viola
            Mar 16 at 16:49











          • $begingroup$
            I thought that you just asked to prove that there exists a constant $gamma$ such that ... You did not ask explicitly "compute the value of $gamma$".
            $endgroup$
            – Danny Pak-Keung Chan
            Mar 16 at 16:59











          • $begingroup$
            Read the question of the OP. "Real Analysis Methodologies to Prove $-int_x^infty fraccos(t)t,dt=gamma+log(x)+int_0^x fraccos(t)-1t,dt$ for $x>0$." The constant $gamma$ is explicitly written. How did you infer that I was interested in something considerably less than that. Furthermore, in the body of the question, I actually show two derivations that include $gamma$.
            $endgroup$
            – Mark Viola
            Mar 16 at 17:08











          • $begingroup$
            I interpret that line as "Prove that there exists $gamma$ such that ... for all $x>0$.
            $endgroup$
            – Danny Pak-Keung Chan
            Mar 16 at 17:12






          • 1




            $begingroup$
            You should state explicitly: Compute the value $gamma$ and express it in close-form. Otherwise, I can write $gamma = G(1) = int_1^infty fraccos tt dt - int_0^1 fraccos t -1t dt$.
            $endgroup$
            – Danny Pak-Keung Chan
            Mar 16 at 17:17

















          • $begingroup$
            You have not evaluated the constant, which renders this development incomplete. But I appreciate your attempt.
            $endgroup$
            – Mark Viola
            Mar 16 at 16:49











          • $begingroup$
            I thought that you just asked to prove that there exists a constant $gamma$ such that ... You did not ask explicitly "compute the value of $gamma$".
            $endgroup$
            – Danny Pak-Keung Chan
            Mar 16 at 16:59











          • $begingroup$
            Read the question of the OP. "Real Analysis Methodologies to Prove $-int_x^infty fraccos(t)t,dt=gamma+log(x)+int_0^x fraccos(t)-1t,dt$ for $x>0$." The constant $gamma$ is explicitly written. How did you infer that I was interested in something considerably less than that. Furthermore, in the body of the question, I actually show two derivations that include $gamma$.
            $endgroup$
            – Mark Viola
            Mar 16 at 17:08











          • $begingroup$
            I interpret that line as "Prove that there exists $gamma$ such that ... for all $x>0$.
            $endgroup$
            – Danny Pak-Keung Chan
            Mar 16 at 17:12






          • 1




            $begingroup$
            You should state explicitly: Compute the value $gamma$ and express it in close-form. Otherwise, I can write $gamma = G(1) = int_1^infty fraccos tt dt - int_0^1 fraccos t -1t dt$.
            $endgroup$
            – Danny Pak-Keung Chan
            Mar 16 at 17:17
















          $begingroup$
          You have not evaluated the constant, which renders this development incomplete. But I appreciate your attempt.
          $endgroup$
          – Mark Viola
          Mar 16 at 16:49





          $begingroup$
          You have not evaluated the constant, which renders this development incomplete. But I appreciate your attempt.
          $endgroup$
          – Mark Viola
          Mar 16 at 16:49













          $begingroup$
          I thought that you just asked to prove that there exists a constant $gamma$ such that ... You did not ask explicitly "compute the value of $gamma$".
          $endgroup$
          – Danny Pak-Keung Chan
          Mar 16 at 16:59





          $begingroup$
          I thought that you just asked to prove that there exists a constant $gamma$ such that ... You did not ask explicitly "compute the value of $gamma$".
          $endgroup$
          – Danny Pak-Keung Chan
          Mar 16 at 16:59













          $begingroup$
          Read the question of the OP. "Real Analysis Methodologies to Prove $-int_x^infty fraccos(t)t,dt=gamma+log(x)+int_0^x fraccos(t)-1t,dt$ for $x>0$." The constant $gamma$ is explicitly written. How did you infer that I was interested in something considerably less than that. Furthermore, in the body of the question, I actually show two derivations that include $gamma$.
          $endgroup$
          – Mark Viola
          Mar 16 at 17:08





          $begingroup$
          Read the question of the OP. "Real Analysis Methodologies to Prove $-int_x^infty fraccos(t)t,dt=gamma+log(x)+int_0^x fraccos(t)-1t,dt$ for $x>0$." The constant $gamma$ is explicitly written. How did you infer that I was interested in something considerably less than that. Furthermore, in the body of the question, I actually show two derivations that include $gamma$.
          $endgroup$
          – Mark Viola
          Mar 16 at 17:08













          $begingroup$
          I interpret that line as "Prove that there exists $gamma$ such that ... for all $x>0$.
          $endgroup$
          – Danny Pak-Keung Chan
          Mar 16 at 17:12




          $begingroup$
          I interpret that line as "Prove that there exists $gamma$ such that ... for all $x>0$.
          $endgroup$
          – Danny Pak-Keung Chan
          Mar 16 at 17:12




          1




          1




          $begingroup$
          You should state explicitly: Compute the value $gamma$ and express it in close-form. Otherwise, I can write $gamma = G(1) = int_1^infty fraccos tt dt - int_0^1 fraccos t -1t dt$.
          $endgroup$
          – Danny Pak-Keung Chan
          Mar 16 at 17:17





          $begingroup$
          You should state explicitly: Compute the value $gamma$ and express it in close-form. Otherwise, I can write $gamma = G(1) = int_1^infty fraccos tt dt - int_0^1 fraccos t -1t dt$.
          $endgroup$
          – Danny Pak-Keung Chan
          Mar 16 at 17:17


















          draft saved

          draft discarded
















































          Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

          But avoid


          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

          Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




          draft saved


          draft discarded














          StackExchange.ready(
          function ()
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3129759%2freal-analysis-methodologies-to-prove-int-x-infty-frac-costt-dt-gamm%23new-answer', 'question_page');

          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown





















































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown

































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown







          Popular posts from this blog

          Lowndes Grove History Architecture References Navigation menu32°48′6″N 79°57′58″W / 32.80167°N 79.96611°W / 32.80167; -79.9661132°48′6″N 79°57′58″W / 32.80167°N 79.96611°W / 32.80167; -79.9661178002500"National Register Information System"Historic houses of South Carolina"Lowndes Grove""+32° 48' 6.00", −79° 57' 58.00""Lowndes Grove, Charleston County (260 St. Margaret St., Charleston)""Lowndes Grove"The Charleston ExpositionIt Happened in South Carolina"Lowndes Grove (House), Saint Margaret Street & Sixth Avenue, Charleston, Charleston County, SC(Photographs)"Plantations of the Carolina Low Countrye

          random experiment with two different functions on unit interval Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara Planned maintenance scheduled April 23, 2019 at 00:00UTC (8:00pm US/Eastern)Random variable and probability space notionsRandom Walk with EdgesFinding functions where the increase over a random interval is Poisson distributedNumber of days until dayCan an observed event in fact be of zero probability?Unit random processmodels of coins and uniform distributionHow to get the number of successes given $n$ trials , probability $P$ and a random variable $X$Absorbing Markov chain in a computer. Is “almost every” turned into always convergence in computer executions?Stopped random walk is not uniformly integrable

          How should I support this large drywall patch? Planned maintenance scheduled April 23, 2019 at 00:00UTC (8:00pm US/Eastern) Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara Unicorn Meta Zoo #1: Why another podcast?How do I cover large gaps in drywall?How do I keep drywall around a patch from crumbling?Can I glue a second layer of drywall?How to patch long strip on drywall?Large drywall patch: how to avoid bulging seams?Drywall Mesh Patch vs. Bulge? To remove or not to remove?How to fix this drywall job?Prep drywall before backsplashWhat's the best way to fix this horrible drywall patch job?Drywall patching using 3M Patch Plus Primer