Real Analysis Methodologies to Prove $-int_x^infty fraccos(t)t,dt=gamma+log(x)+int_0^x fraccos(t)-1t,dt$ for $x>0$cosine integralEvaluating the integral $int_0^infty fracx sin rx a^2+x^2 dx$ using only real analysisIntegral $int_0^infty fracln cos^2 xx^2dx=-pi$Double Integral $int_0^infty int_0^infty fraclog x log ysqrt xycos(x+y),dx,dy=(gamma+2log 2)pi^2$Help with the integral $int_0^inftyfracx^yGamma(y)cos(y)dy$Real-Analysis Methods to Evaluate $int_0^infty fracx^a1+x^2,dx$, $|a|<1$.Alternative approaches to showing that $gamma=int_0^infty left(frac11+x^a-frac1e^xright),frac1x,dx$, $a>0$Real Analysis Methodologies to show $gamma =2int_0^infty fraccos(x^2)-cos(x)x,dx$Prove that log Gamma is real analyticHow to prove $int_0^+infty fracsin(x)x^s = cos(fracpi s2) Gamma(1-s)$prove $int_0^infty fraclog^2(x)x^2+1mathrm dx=fracpi^38$ with real methods
What is this high flying aircraft over Pennsylvania?
How do you say "Trust your struggle." in French?
A seasonal riddle
How can I, as DM, avoid the Conga Line of Death occurring when implementing some form of flanking rule?
How do I prevent inappropriate ads from appearing in my game?
Do I have to take mana from my deck or hand when tapping this card?
Extract substring according to regexp with sed or grep
PTIJ: Which Dr. Seuss books should one obtain?
Capacitor electron flow
Why is implicit conversion not ambiguous for non-primitive types?
C++ lambda syntax
What properties make a magic weapon befit a Rogue more than a DEX-based Fighter?
Started in 1987 vs. Starting in 1987
Output visual diagram of picture
Unfrosted light bulb
Writing in a Christian voice
Pre-Employment Background Check With Consent For Future Checks
Mortal danger in mid-grade literature
Do people actually use the word "kaputt" in conversation?
Relations between homogeneous polynomials
Checking @@ROWCOUNT failing
Why is participating in the European Parliamentary elections used as a threat?
Is this saw blade faulty?
Travelling in US for more than 90 days
Real Analysis Methodologies to Prove $-int_x^infty fraccos(t)t,dt=gamma+log(x)+int_0^x fraccos(t)-1t,dt$ for $x>0$
cosine integralEvaluating the integral $int_0^infty fracx sin rx a^2+x^2 dx$ using only real analysisIntegral $int_0^infty fracln cos^2 xx^2dx=-pi$Double Integral $int_0^infty int_0^infty fraclog x log ysqrt xycos(x+y),dx,dy=(gamma+2log 2)pi^2$Help with the integral $int_0^inftyfracx^yGamma(y)cos(y)dy$Real-Analysis Methods to Evaluate $int_0^infty fracx^a1+x^2,dx$, $|a|<1$.Alternative approaches to showing that $gamma=int_0^infty left(frac11+x^a-frac1e^xright),frac1x,dx$, $a>0$Real Analysis Methodologies to show $gamma =2int_0^infty fraccos(x^2)-cos(x)x,dx$Prove that log Gamma is real analyticHow to prove $int_0^+infty fracsin(x)x^s = cos(fracpi s2) Gamma(1-s)$prove $int_0^infty fraclog^2(x)x^2+1mathrm dx=fracpi^38$ with real methods
$begingroup$
In this question, the OP asked to prove that $-int_x^infty fraccos(t)t,dt=gamma+log(x)+int_0^x fraccos(t)-1t,dt$, where $gamma $ is the Euler-Mascheroni constant. However, the two posted answers are incomplete and seem unsatisfactory.
Using Complex Anaysis
One can show for $x>0$ that $-int_x^infty fraccos(t)t,dt=gamma+log(x)+int_0^x fraccos(t)-1t,dt$ using contour integration. To wit, Cauchy's Integral Theorem guarantees that
$$beginalign
0&=oint_C frace^izz,dz\\
&=int_epsilon^R frace^ixx,dx +int_0^pi/2frace^iRe^iphiRe^iphi,iRe^iphi,dphi+int_R^epsilon frace^-xix,i,dx+int_pi/2^0 frace^iepsilon e^iphiepsilon e^iphi,iepsilon e^iphi,dphi\\
&=int_epsilon^R frace^ixx,dx -int_epsilon^R frace^-xx,dx-ifracpi2+O(epsilon)+Oleft(frac1Rright)tag1
endalign$$
whence after taking the real part of both sides of $(1$ and integrating by parts the integral $int_epsilon^R frace^-xx,dx$ with $u=e^-x$ and $v=log(x)$, we find
$$beginalign-int_x^R fraccos(x')x',dx'&=log(x)-int_epsilon^R e^-xlog(x),dx+int_epsilon^xfraccos(x')-1x',dx'\\
&-log(epsilon) -e^-Rlog(R)+e^-epsilonlog(epsilon)+Oleft(frac1Rright)+O(epsilon)tag2
endalign$$
Letting $Rtoinfty$ and $epsilonto 0$ in $(2)$ yields the sought relationship.
Using Real Analysis
Alternatively, we can use either the Laplace Transform or "Feynman's Trick" to show that
$$int_0^infty fraccos(x)-e^-xx,dx=int_0^infty left(fracxx^2+1-frac1x+1right)=0tag3$$
Starting with $(3)$, is tantamount to starting with the real part of $(1)$ and we are done.
So, what are other ways to prove the coveted relationship using real analysis tools only?
real-analysis special-functions
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
In this question, the OP asked to prove that $-int_x^infty fraccos(t)t,dt=gamma+log(x)+int_0^x fraccos(t)-1t,dt$, where $gamma $ is the Euler-Mascheroni constant. However, the two posted answers are incomplete and seem unsatisfactory.
Using Complex Anaysis
One can show for $x>0$ that $-int_x^infty fraccos(t)t,dt=gamma+log(x)+int_0^x fraccos(t)-1t,dt$ using contour integration. To wit, Cauchy's Integral Theorem guarantees that
$$beginalign
0&=oint_C frace^izz,dz\\
&=int_epsilon^R frace^ixx,dx +int_0^pi/2frace^iRe^iphiRe^iphi,iRe^iphi,dphi+int_R^epsilon frace^-xix,i,dx+int_pi/2^0 frace^iepsilon e^iphiepsilon e^iphi,iepsilon e^iphi,dphi\\
&=int_epsilon^R frace^ixx,dx -int_epsilon^R frace^-xx,dx-ifracpi2+O(epsilon)+Oleft(frac1Rright)tag1
endalign$$
whence after taking the real part of both sides of $(1$ and integrating by parts the integral $int_epsilon^R frace^-xx,dx$ with $u=e^-x$ and $v=log(x)$, we find
$$beginalign-int_x^R fraccos(x')x',dx'&=log(x)-int_epsilon^R e^-xlog(x),dx+int_epsilon^xfraccos(x')-1x',dx'\\
&-log(epsilon) -e^-Rlog(R)+e^-epsilonlog(epsilon)+Oleft(frac1Rright)+O(epsilon)tag2
endalign$$
Letting $Rtoinfty$ and $epsilonto 0$ in $(2)$ yields the sought relationship.
Using Real Analysis
Alternatively, we can use either the Laplace Transform or "Feynman's Trick" to show that
$$int_0^infty fraccos(x)-e^-xx,dx=int_0^infty left(fracxx^2+1-frac1x+1right)=0tag3$$
Starting with $(3)$, is tantamount to starting with the real part of $(1)$ and we are done.
So, what are other ways to prove the coveted relationship using real analysis tools only?
real-analysis special-functions
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
In this question, the OP asked to prove that $-int_x^infty fraccos(t)t,dt=gamma+log(x)+int_0^x fraccos(t)-1t,dt$, where $gamma $ is the Euler-Mascheroni constant. However, the two posted answers are incomplete and seem unsatisfactory.
Using Complex Anaysis
One can show for $x>0$ that $-int_x^infty fraccos(t)t,dt=gamma+log(x)+int_0^x fraccos(t)-1t,dt$ using contour integration. To wit, Cauchy's Integral Theorem guarantees that
$$beginalign
0&=oint_C frace^izz,dz\\
&=int_epsilon^R frace^ixx,dx +int_0^pi/2frace^iRe^iphiRe^iphi,iRe^iphi,dphi+int_R^epsilon frace^-xix,i,dx+int_pi/2^0 frace^iepsilon e^iphiepsilon e^iphi,iepsilon e^iphi,dphi\\
&=int_epsilon^R frace^ixx,dx -int_epsilon^R frace^-xx,dx-ifracpi2+O(epsilon)+Oleft(frac1Rright)tag1
endalign$$
whence after taking the real part of both sides of $(1$ and integrating by parts the integral $int_epsilon^R frace^-xx,dx$ with $u=e^-x$ and $v=log(x)$, we find
$$beginalign-int_x^R fraccos(x')x',dx'&=log(x)-int_epsilon^R e^-xlog(x),dx+int_epsilon^xfraccos(x')-1x',dx'\\
&-log(epsilon) -e^-Rlog(R)+e^-epsilonlog(epsilon)+Oleft(frac1Rright)+O(epsilon)tag2
endalign$$
Letting $Rtoinfty$ and $epsilonto 0$ in $(2)$ yields the sought relationship.
Using Real Analysis
Alternatively, we can use either the Laplace Transform or "Feynman's Trick" to show that
$$int_0^infty fraccos(x)-e^-xx,dx=int_0^infty left(fracxx^2+1-frac1x+1right)=0tag3$$
Starting with $(3)$, is tantamount to starting with the real part of $(1)$ and we are done.
So, what are other ways to prove the coveted relationship using real analysis tools only?
real-analysis special-functions
$endgroup$
In this question, the OP asked to prove that $-int_x^infty fraccos(t)t,dt=gamma+log(x)+int_0^x fraccos(t)-1t,dt$, where $gamma $ is the Euler-Mascheroni constant. However, the two posted answers are incomplete and seem unsatisfactory.
Using Complex Anaysis
One can show for $x>0$ that $-int_x^infty fraccos(t)t,dt=gamma+log(x)+int_0^x fraccos(t)-1t,dt$ using contour integration. To wit, Cauchy's Integral Theorem guarantees that
$$beginalign
0&=oint_C frace^izz,dz\\
&=int_epsilon^R frace^ixx,dx +int_0^pi/2frace^iRe^iphiRe^iphi,iRe^iphi,dphi+int_R^epsilon frace^-xix,i,dx+int_pi/2^0 frace^iepsilon e^iphiepsilon e^iphi,iepsilon e^iphi,dphi\\
&=int_epsilon^R frace^ixx,dx -int_epsilon^R frace^-xx,dx-ifracpi2+O(epsilon)+Oleft(frac1Rright)tag1
endalign$$
whence after taking the real part of both sides of $(1$ and integrating by parts the integral $int_epsilon^R frace^-xx,dx$ with $u=e^-x$ and $v=log(x)$, we find
$$beginalign-int_x^R fraccos(x')x',dx'&=log(x)-int_epsilon^R e^-xlog(x),dx+int_epsilon^xfraccos(x')-1x',dx'\\
&-log(epsilon) -e^-Rlog(R)+e^-epsilonlog(epsilon)+Oleft(frac1Rright)+O(epsilon)tag2
endalign$$
Letting $Rtoinfty$ and $epsilonto 0$ in $(2)$ yields the sought relationship.
Using Real Analysis
Alternatively, we can use either the Laplace Transform or "Feynman's Trick" to show that
$$int_0^infty fraccos(x)-e^-xx,dx=int_0^infty left(fracxx^2+1-frac1x+1right)=0tag3$$
Starting with $(3)$, is tantamount to starting with the real part of $(1)$ and we are done.
So, what are other ways to prove the coveted relationship using real analysis tools only?
real-analysis special-functions
real-analysis special-functions
edited 2 days ago
Mark Viola
asked Feb 28 at 5:09
Mark ViolaMark Viola
133k1278176
133k1278176
add a comment |
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
Note that for each $x>0$, the improper integral $int_x^inftyfraccos(t)tdt$
converges conditionally (in the sense that $lim_Arightarrowinftyint_x^Afraccos(t)tdt$
exists but $lim_Arightarrowinftyint_x^Aleft|fraccos(t)tright|dt=infty$).
Define $F:(0,infty)rightarrowmathbbR$ by $F(x)=int_x^inftyfraccos(t)tdt$.
Note that we still have $F'(x)=-fraccos(x)x$. For,
begineqnarray*
F'(x) & = & lim_hrightarrow0fracint_x+h^inftyfraccos(t)tdt-int_x^inftyfraccos(t)tdth\
& = & -lim_hrightarrow0fracint_x^x+hfraccos(t)tdth\
& = & -fraccos(x)x.
endeqnarray*
On the other hand, $0$ in the integral $int_0^xfraccos(t)-1tdt$
is a removable singularity. For $tneq0$, we have
begineqnarray*
fraccos(t)-1t & = & frac(1-frac12!t^2+frac14!t^4-cdots)-1t\
& = & -frac12!t+frac14!t^3-frac16!t^5+cdots.
endeqnarray*
Define $phi:mathbbRrightarrowmathbbR$ by $phi(t)=-frac12!t+frac14!t^3-frac16!t^5+cdots$.
It can be proved that the power series converges everywhere (using
root-test), and hence $phi$ is an analytic function. Therefore $int_0^xfraccos(t)-1tdt=int_0^xphi(t)dt$.
Now $fracddxint_0^xfraccos(t)-1tdt=fraccos(x)-1x$.
Finally, define $G:(0,infty)rightarrowmathbbR$ by
$$
G(x)=int_x^inftyfraccos(t)tdt-left[ln(x)+int_0^xfraccos(t)-1tdtright].
$$
Then $G$ is differentiable and $G'(x)=-fraccos(x)x-frac1x-fraccos(x)-1x=0$.
This shows that $G$ is a constant function.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
You have not evaluated the constant, which renders this development incomplete. But I appreciate your attempt.
$endgroup$
– Mark Viola
Mar 16 at 16:49
$begingroup$
I thought that you just asked to prove that there exists a constant $gamma$ such that ... You did not ask explicitly "compute the value of $gamma$".
$endgroup$
– Danny Pak-Keung Chan
Mar 16 at 16:59
$begingroup$
Read the question of the OP. "Real Analysis Methodologies to Prove $-int_x^infty fraccos(t)t,dt=gamma+log(x)+int_0^x fraccos(t)-1t,dt$ for $x>0$." The constant $gamma$ is explicitly written. How did you infer that I was interested in something considerably less than that. Furthermore, in the body of the question, I actually show two derivations that include $gamma$.
$endgroup$
– Mark Viola
Mar 16 at 17:08
$begingroup$
I interpret that line as "Prove that there exists $gamma$ such that ... for all $x>0$.
$endgroup$
– Danny Pak-Keung Chan
Mar 16 at 17:12
1
$begingroup$
You should state explicitly: Compute the value $gamma$ and express it in close-form. Otherwise, I can write $gamma = G(1) = int_1^infty fraccos tt dt - int_0^1 fraccos t -1t dt$.
$endgroup$
– Danny Pak-Keung Chan
Mar 16 at 17:17
|
show 7 more comments
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
);
);
, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);
else
createEditor();
);
function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);
);
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3129759%2freal-analysis-methodologies-to-prove-int-x-infty-frac-costt-dt-gamm%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
Note that for each $x>0$, the improper integral $int_x^inftyfraccos(t)tdt$
converges conditionally (in the sense that $lim_Arightarrowinftyint_x^Afraccos(t)tdt$
exists but $lim_Arightarrowinftyint_x^Aleft|fraccos(t)tright|dt=infty$).
Define $F:(0,infty)rightarrowmathbbR$ by $F(x)=int_x^inftyfraccos(t)tdt$.
Note that we still have $F'(x)=-fraccos(x)x$. For,
begineqnarray*
F'(x) & = & lim_hrightarrow0fracint_x+h^inftyfraccos(t)tdt-int_x^inftyfraccos(t)tdth\
& = & -lim_hrightarrow0fracint_x^x+hfraccos(t)tdth\
& = & -fraccos(x)x.
endeqnarray*
On the other hand, $0$ in the integral $int_0^xfraccos(t)-1tdt$
is a removable singularity. For $tneq0$, we have
begineqnarray*
fraccos(t)-1t & = & frac(1-frac12!t^2+frac14!t^4-cdots)-1t\
& = & -frac12!t+frac14!t^3-frac16!t^5+cdots.
endeqnarray*
Define $phi:mathbbRrightarrowmathbbR$ by $phi(t)=-frac12!t+frac14!t^3-frac16!t^5+cdots$.
It can be proved that the power series converges everywhere (using
root-test), and hence $phi$ is an analytic function. Therefore $int_0^xfraccos(t)-1tdt=int_0^xphi(t)dt$.
Now $fracddxint_0^xfraccos(t)-1tdt=fraccos(x)-1x$.
Finally, define $G:(0,infty)rightarrowmathbbR$ by
$$
G(x)=int_x^inftyfraccos(t)tdt-left[ln(x)+int_0^xfraccos(t)-1tdtright].
$$
Then $G$ is differentiable and $G'(x)=-fraccos(x)x-frac1x-fraccos(x)-1x=0$.
This shows that $G$ is a constant function.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
You have not evaluated the constant, which renders this development incomplete. But I appreciate your attempt.
$endgroup$
– Mark Viola
Mar 16 at 16:49
$begingroup$
I thought that you just asked to prove that there exists a constant $gamma$ such that ... You did not ask explicitly "compute the value of $gamma$".
$endgroup$
– Danny Pak-Keung Chan
Mar 16 at 16:59
$begingroup$
Read the question of the OP. "Real Analysis Methodologies to Prove $-int_x^infty fraccos(t)t,dt=gamma+log(x)+int_0^x fraccos(t)-1t,dt$ for $x>0$." The constant $gamma$ is explicitly written. How did you infer that I was interested in something considerably less than that. Furthermore, in the body of the question, I actually show two derivations that include $gamma$.
$endgroup$
– Mark Viola
Mar 16 at 17:08
$begingroup$
I interpret that line as "Prove that there exists $gamma$ such that ... for all $x>0$.
$endgroup$
– Danny Pak-Keung Chan
Mar 16 at 17:12
1
$begingroup$
You should state explicitly: Compute the value $gamma$ and express it in close-form. Otherwise, I can write $gamma = G(1) = int_1^infty fraccos tt dt - int_0^1 fraccos t -1t dt$.
$endgroup$
– Danny Pak-Keung Chan
Mar 16 at 17:17
|
show 7 more comments
$begingroup$
Note that for each $x>0$, the improper integral $int_x^inftyfraccos(t)tdt$
converges conditionally (in the sense that $lim_Arightarrowinftyint_x^Afraccos(t)tdt$
exists but $lim_Arightarrowinftyint_x^Aleft|fraccos(t)tright|dt=infty$).
Define $F:(0,infty)rightarrowmathbbR$ by $F(x)=int_x^inftyfraccos(t)tdt$.
Note that we still have $F'(x)=-fraccos(x)x$. For,
begineqnarray*
F'(x) & = & lim_hrightarrow0fracint_x+h^inftyfraccos(t)tdt-int_x^inftyfraccos(t)tdth\
& = & -lim_hrightarrow0fracint_x^x+hfraccos(t)tdth\
& = & -fraccos(x)x.
endeqnarray*
On the other hand, $0$ in the integral $int_0^xfraccos(t)-1tdt$
is a removable singularity. For $tneq0$, we have
begineqnarray*
fraccos(t)-1t & = & frac(1-frac12!t^2+frac14!t^4-cdots)-1t\
& = & -frac12!t+frac14!t^3-frac16!t^5+cdots.
endeqnarray*
Define $phi:mathbbRrightarrowmathbbR$ by $phi(t)=-frac12!t+frac14!t^3-frac16!t^5+cdots$.
It can be proved that the power series converges everywhere (using
root-test), and hence $phi$ is an analytic function. Therefore $int_0^xfraccos(t)-1tdt=int_0^xphi(t)dt$.
Now $fracddxint_0^xfraccos(t)-1tdt=fraccos(x)-1x$.
Finally, define $G:(0,infty)rightarrowmathbbR$ by
$$
G(x)=int_x^inftyfraccos(t)tdt-left[ln(x)+int_0^xfraccos(t)-1tdtright].
$$
Then $G$ is differentiable and $G'(x)=-fraccos(x)x-frac1x-fraccos(x)-1x=0$.
This shows that $G$ is a constant function.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
You have not evaluated the constant, which renders this development incomplete. But I appreciate your attempt.
$endgroup$
– Mark Viola
Mar 16 at 16:49
$begingroup$
I thought that you just asked to prove that there exists a constant $gamma$ such that ... You did not ask explicitly "compute the value of $gamma$".
$endgroup$
– Danny Pak-Keung Chan
Mar 16 at 16:59
$begingroup$
Read the question of the OP. "Real Analysis Methodologies to Prove $-int_x^infty fraccos(t)t,dt=gamma+log(x)+int_0^x fraccos(t)-1t,dt$ for $x>0$." The constant $gamma$ is explicitly written. How did you infer that I was interested in something considerably less than that. Furthermore, in the body of the question, I actually show two derivations that include $gamma$.
$endgroup$
– Mark Viola
Mar 16 at 17:08
$begingroup$
I interpret that line as "Prove that there exists $gamma$ such that ... for all $x>0$.
$endgroup$
– Danny Pak-Keung Chan
Mar 16 at 17:12
1
$begingroup$
You should state explicitly: Compute the value $gamma$ and express it in close-form. Otherwise, I can write $gamma = G(1) = int_1^infty fraccos tt dt - int_0^1 fraccos t -1t dt$.
$endgroup$
– Danny Pak-Keung Chan
Mar 16 at 17:17
|
show 7 more comments
$begingroup$
Note that for each $x>0$, the improper integral $int_x^inftyfraccos(t)tdt$
converges conditionally (in the sense that $lim_Arightarrowinftyint_x^Afraccos(t)tdt$
exists but $lim_Arightarrowinftyint_x^Aleft|fraccos(t)tright|dt=infty$).
Define $F:(0,infty)rightarrowmathbbR$ by $F(x)=int_x^inftyfraccos(t)tdt$.
Note that we still have $F'(x)=-fraccos(x)x$. For,
begineqnarray*
F'(x) & = & lim_hrightarrow0fracint_x+h^inftyfraccos(t)tdt-int_x^inftyfraccos(t)tdth\
& = & -lim_hrightarrow0fracint_x^x+hfraccos(t)tdth\
& = & -fraccos(x)x.
endeqnarray*
On the other hand, $0$ in the integral $int_0^xfraccos(t)-1tdt$
is a removable singularity. For $tneq0$, we have
begineqnarray*
fraccos(t)-1t & = & frac(1-frac12!t^2+frac14!t^4-cdots)-1t\
& = & -frac12!t+frac14!t^3-frac16!t^5+cdots.
endeqnarray*
Define $phi:mathbbRrightarrowmathbbR$ by $phi(t)=-frac12!t+frac14!t^3-frac16!t^5+cdots$.
It can be proved that the power series converges everywhere (using
root-test), and hence $phi$ is an analytic function. Therefore $int_0^xfraccos(t)-1tdt=int_0^xphi(t)dt$.
Now $fracddxint_0^xfraccos(t)-1tdt=fraccos(x)-1x$.
Finally, define $G:(0,infty)rightarrowmathbbR$ by
$$
G(x)=int_x^inftyfraccos(t)tdt-left[ln(x)+int_0^xfraccos(t)-1tdtright].
$$
Then $G$ is differentiable and $G'(x)=-fraccos(x)x-frac1x-fraccos(x)-1x=0$.
This shows that $G$ is a constant function.
$endgroup$
Note that for each $x>0$, the improper integral $int_x^inftyfraccos(t)tdt$
converges conditionally (in the sense that $lim_Arightarrowinftyint_x^Afraccos(t)tdt$
exists but $lim_Arightarrowinftyint_x^Aleft|fraccos(t)tright|dt=infty$).
Define $F:(0,infty)rightarrowmathbbR$ by $F(x)=int_x^inftyfraccos(t)tdt$.
Note that we still have $F'(x)=-fraccos(x)x$. For,
begineqnarray*
F'(x) & = & lim_hrightarrow0fracint_x+h^inftyfraccos(t)tdt-int_x^inftyfraccos(t)tdth\
& = & -lim_hrightarrow0fracint_x^x+hfraccos(t)tdth\
& = & -fraccos(x)x.
endeqnarray*
On the other hand, $0$ in the integral $int_0^xfraccos(t)-1tdt$
is a removable singularity. For $tneq0$, we have
begineqnarray*
fraccos(t)-1t & = & frac(1-frac12!t^2+frac14!t^4-cdots)-1t\
& = & -frac12!t+frac14!t^3-frac16!t^5+cdots.
endeqnarray*
Define $phi:mathbbRrightarrowmathbbR$ by $phi(t)=-frac12!t+frac14!t^3-frac16!t^5+cdots$.
It can be proved that the power series converges everywhere (using
root-test), and hence $phi$ is an analytic function. Therefore $int_0^xfraccos(t)-1tdt=int_0^xphi(t)dt$.
Now $fracddxint_0^xfraccos(t)-1tdt=fraccos(x)-1x$.
Finally, define $G:(0,infty)rightarrowmathbbR$ by
$$
G(x)=int_x^inftyfraccos(t)tdt-left[ln(x)+int_0^xfraccos(t)-1tdtright].
$$
Then $G$ is differentiable and $G'(x)=-fraccos(x)x-frac1x-fraccos(x)-1x=0$.
This shows that $G$ is a constant function.
answered Mar 16 at 16:28
Danny Pak-Keung ChanDanny Pak-Keung Chan
2,50938
2,50938
$begingroup$
You have not evaluated the constant, which renders this development incomplete. But I appreciate your attempt.
$endgroup$
– Mark Viola
Mar 16 at 16:49
$begingroup$
I thought that you just asked to prove that there exists a constant $gamma$ such that ... You did not ask explicitly "compute the value of $gamma$".
$endgroup$
– Danny Pak-Keung Chan
Mar 16 at 16:59
$begingroup$
Read the question of the OP. "Real Analysis Methodologies to Prove $-int_x^infty fraccos(t)t,dt=gamma+log(x)+int_0^x fraccos(t)-1t,dt$ for $x>0$." The constant $gamma$ is explicitly written. How did you infer that I was interested in something considerably less than that. Furthermore, in the body of the question, I actually show two derivations that include $gamma$.
$endgroup$
– Mark Viola
Mar 16 at 17:08
$begingroup$
I interpret that line as "Prove that there exists $gamma$ such that ... for all $x>0$.
$endgroup$
– Danny Pak-Keung Chan
Mar 16 at 17:12
1
$begingroup$
You should state explicitly: Compute the value $gamma$ and express it in close-form. Otherwise, I can write $gamma = G(1) = int_1^infty fraccos tt dt - int_0^1 fraccos t -1t dt$.
$endgroup$
– Danny Pak-Keung Chan
Mar 16 at 17:17
|
show 7 more comments
$begingroup$
You have not evaluated the constant, which renders this development incomplete. But I appreciate your attempt.
$endgroup$
– Mark Viola
Mar 16 at 16:49
$begingroup$
I thought that you just asked to prove that there exists a constant $gamma$ such that ... You did not ask explicitly "compute the value of $gamma$".
$endgroup$
– Danny Pak-Keung Chan
Mar 16 at 16:59
$begingroup$
Read the question of the OP. "Real Analysis Methodologies to Prove $-int_x^infty fraccos(t)t,dt=gamma+log(x)+int_0^x fraccos(t)-1t,dt$ for $x>0$." The constant $gamma$ is explicitly written. How did you infer that I was interested in something considerably less than that. Furthermore, in the body of the question, I actually show two derivations that include $gamma$.
$endgroup$
– Mark Viola
Mar 16 at 17:08
$begingroup$
I interpret that line as "Prove that there exists $gamma$ such that ... for all $x>0$.
$endgroup$
– Danny Pak-Keung Chan
Mar 16 at 17:12
1
$begingroup$
You should state explicitly: Compute the value $gamma$ and express it in close-form. Otherwise, I can write $gamma = G(1) = int_1^infty fraccos tt dt - int_0^1 fraccos t -1t dt$.
$endgroup$
– Danny Pak-Keung Chan
Mar 16 at 17:17
$begingroup$
You have not evaluated the constant, which renders this development incomplete. But I appreciate your attempt.
$endgroup$
– Mark Viola
Mar 16 at 16:49
$begingroup$
You have not evaluated the constant, which renders this development incomplete. But I appreciate your attempt.
$endgroup$
– Mark Viola
Mar 16 at 16:49
$begingroup$
I thought that you just asked to prove that there exists a constant $gamma$ such that ... You did not ask explicitly "compute the value of $gamma$".
$endgroup$
– Danny Pak-Keung Chan
Mar 16 at 16:59
$begingroup$
I thought that you just asked to prove that there exists a constant $gamma$ such that ... You did not ask explicitly "compute the value of $gamma$".
$endgroup$
– Danny Pak-Keung Chan
Mar 16 at 16:59
$begingroup$
Read the question of the OP. "Real Analysis Methodologies to Prove $-int_x^infty fraccos(t)t,dt=gamma+log(x)+int_0^x fraccos(t)-1t,dt$ for $x>0$." The constant $gamma$ is explicitly written. How did you infer that I was interested in something considerably less than that. Furthermore, in the body of the question, I actually show two derivations that include $gamma$.
$endgroup$
– Mark Viola
Mar 16 at 17:08
$begingroup$
Read the question of the OP. "Real Analysis Methodologies to Prove $-int_x^infty fraccos(t)t,dt=gamma+log(x)+int_0^x fraccos(t)-1t,dt$ for $x>0$." The constant $gamma$ is explicitly written. How did you infer that I was interested in something considerably less than that. Furthermore, in the body of the question, I actually show two derivations that include $gamma$.
$endgroup$
– Mark Viola
Mar 16 at 17:08
$begingroup$
I interpret that line as "Prove that there exists $gamma$ such that ... for all $x>0$.
$endgroup$
– Danny Pak-Keung Chan
Mar 16 at 17:12
$begingroup$
I interpret that line as "Prove that there exists $gamma$ such that ... for all $x>0$.
$endgroup$
– Danny Pak-Keung Chan
Mar 16 at 17:12
1
1
$begingroup$
You should state explicitly: Compute the value $gamma$ and express it in close-form. Otherwise, I can write $gamma = G(1) = int_1^infty fraccos tt dt - int_0^1 fraccos t -1t dt$.
$endgroup$
– Danny Pak-Keung Chan
Mar 16 at 17:17
$begingroup$
You should state explicitly: Compute the value $gamma$ and express it in close-form. Otherwise, I can write $gamma = G(1) = int_1^infty fraccos tt dt - int_0^1 fraccos t -1t dt$.
$endgroup$
– Danny Pak-Keung Chan
Mar 16 at 17:17
|
show 7 more comments
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3129759%2freal-analysis-methodologies-to-prove-int-x-infty-frac-costt-dt-gamm%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown