Real Analysis Methodologies to Prove $-int_x^infty fraccos(t)t,dt=gamma+log(x)+int_0^x fraccos(t)-1t,dt$ for $x>0$cosine integralEvaluating the integral $int_0^infty fracx sin rx a^2+x^2 dx$ using only real analysisIntegral $int_0^infty fracln cos^2 xx^2dx=-pi$Double Integral $int_0^infty int_0^infty fraclog x log ysqrt xycos(x+y),dx,dy=(gamma+2log 2)pi^2$Help with the integral $int_0^inftyfracx^yGamma(y)cos(y)dy$Real-Analysis Methods to Evaluate $int_0^infty fracx^a1+x^2,dx$, $|a|<1$.Alternative approaches to showing that $gamma=int_0^infty left(frac11+x^a-frac1e^xright),frac1x,dx$, $a>0$Real Analysis Methodologies to show $gamma =2int_0^infty fraccos(x^2)-cos(x)x,dx$Prove that log Gamma is real analyticHow to prove $int_0^+infty fracsin(x)x^s = cos(fracpi s2) Gamma(1-s)$prove $int_0^infty fraclog^2(x)x^2+1mathrm dx=fracpi^38$ with real methods

What is this high flying aircraft over Pennsylvania?

How do you say "Trust your struggle." in French?

A seasonal riddle

How can I, as DM, avoid the Conga Line of Death occurring when implementing some form of flanking rule?

How do I prevent inappropriate ads from appearing in my game?

Do I have to take mana from my deck or hand when tapping this card?

Extract substring according to regexp with sed or grep

PTIJ: Which Dr. Seuss books should one obtain?

Capacitor electron flow

Why is implicit conversion not ambiguous for non-primitive types?

C++ lambda syntax

What properties make a magic weapon befit a Rogue more than a DEX-based Fighter?

Started in 1987 vs. Starting in 1987

Output visual diagram of picture

Unfrosted light bulb

Writing in a Christian voice

Pre-Employment Background Check With Consent For Future Checks

Mortal danger in mid-grade literature

Do people actually use the word "kaputt" in conversation?

Relations between homogeneous polynomials

Checking @@ROWCOUNT failing

Why is participating in the European Parliamentary elections used as a threat?

Is this saw blade faulty?

Travelling in US for more than 90 days



Real Analysis Methodologies to Prove $-int_x^infty fraccos(t)t,dt=gamma+log(x)+int_0^x fraccos(t)-1t,dt$ for $x>0$


cosine integralEvaluating the integral $int_0^infty fracx sin rx a^2+x^2 dx$ using only real analysisIntegral $int_0^infty fracln cos^2 xx^2dx=-pi$Double Integral $int_0^infty int_0^infty fraclog x log ysqrt xycos(x+y),dx,dy=(gamma+2log 2)pi^2$Help with the integral $int_0^inftyfracx^yGamma(y)cos(y)dy$Real-Analysis Methods to Evaluate $int_0^infty fracx^a1+x^2,dx$, $|a|<1$.Alternative approaches to showing that $gamma=int_0^infty left(frac11+x^a-frac1e^xright),frac1x,dx$, $a>0$Real Analysis Methodologies to show $gamma =2int_0^infty fraccos(x^2)-cos(x)x,dx$Prove that log Gamma is real analyticHow to prove $int_0^+infty fracsin(x)x^s = cos(fracpi s2) Gamma(1-s)$prove $int_0^infty fraclog^2(x)x^2+1mathrm dx=fracpi^38$ with real methods













1












$begingroup$


In this question, the OP asked to prove that $-int_x^infty fraccos(t)t,dt=gamma+log(x)+int_0^x fraccos(t)-1t,dt$, where $gamma $ is the Euler-Mascheroni constant. However, the two posted answers are incomplete and seem unsatisfactory.




Using Complex Anaysis



One can show for $x>0$ that $-int_x^infty fraccos(t)t,dt=gamma+log(x)+int_0^x fraccos(t)-1t,dt$ using contour integration. To wit, Cauchy's Integral Theorem guarantees that



$$beginalign
0&=oint_C frace^izz,dz\\
&=int_epsilon^R frace^ixx,dx +int_0^pi/2frace^iRe^iphiRe^iphi,iRe^iphi,dphi+int_R^epsilon frace^-xix,i,dx+int_pi/2^0 frace^iepsilon e^iphiepsilon e^iphi,iepsilon e^iphi,dphi\\
&=int_epsilon^R frace^ixx,dx -int_epsilon^R frace^-xx,dx-ifracpi2+O(epsilon)+Oleft(frac1Rright)tag1
endalign$$



whence after taking the real part of both sides of $(1$ and integrating by parts the integral $int_epsilon^R frace^-xx,dx$ with $u=e^-x$ and $v=log(x)$, we find



$$beginalign-int_x^R fraccos(x')x',dx'&=log(x)-int_epsilon^R e^-xlog(x),dx+int_epsilon^xfraccos(x')-1x',dx'\\
&-log(epsilon) -e^-Rlog(R)+e^-epsilonlog(epsilon)+Oleft(frac1Rright)+O(epsilon)tag2
endalign$$



Letting $Rtoinfty$ and $epsilonto 0$ in $(2)$ yields the sought relationship.




Using Real Analysis
Alternatively, we can use either the Laplace Transform or "Feynman's Trick" to show that



$$int_0^infty fraccos(x)-e^-xx,dx=int_0^infty left(fracxx^2+1-frac1x+1right)=0tag3$$



Starting with $(3)$, is tantamount to starting with the real part of $(1)$ and we are done.





So, what are other ways to prove the coveted relationship using real analysis tools only?











share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$
















    1












    $begingroup$


    In this question, the OP asked to prove that $-int_x^infty fraccos(t)t,dt=gamma+log(x)+int_0^x fraccos(t)-1t,dt$, where $gamma $ is the Euler-Mascheroni constant. However, the two posted answers are incomplete and seem unsatisfactory.




    Using Complex Anaysis



    One can show for $x>0$ that $-int_x^infty fraccos(t)t,dt=gamma+log(x)+int_0^x fraccos(t)-1t,dt$ using contour integration. To wit, Cauchy's Integral Theorem guarantees that



    $$beginalign
    0&=oint_C frace^izz,dz\\
    &=int_epsilon^R frace^ixx,dx +int_0^pi/2frace^iRe^iphiRe^iphi,iRe^iphi,dphi+int_R^epsilon frace^-xix,i,dx+int_pi/2^0 frace^iepsilon e^iphiepsilon e^iphi,iepsilon e^iphi,dphi\\
    &=int_epsilon^R frace^ixx,dx -int_epsilon^R frace^-xx,dx-ifracpi2+O(epsilon)+Oleft(frac1Rright)tag1
    endalign$$



    whence after taking the real part of both sides of $(1$ and integrating by parts the integral $int_epsilon^R frace^-xx,dx$ with $u=e^-x$ and $v=log(x)$, we find



    $$beginalign-int_x^R fraccos(x')x',dx'&=log(x)-int_epsilon^R e^-xlog(x),dx+int_epsilon^xfraccos(x')-1x',dx'\\
    &-log(epsilon) -e^-Rlog(R)+e^-epsilonlog(epsilon)+Oleft(frac1Rright)+O(epsilon)tag2
    endalign$$



    Letting $Rtoinfty$ and $epsilonto 0$ in $(2)$ yields the sought relationship.




    Using Real Analysis
    Alternatively, we can use either the Laplace Transform or "Feynman's Trick" to show that



    $$int_0^infty fraccos(x)-e^-xx,dx=int_0^infty left(fracxx^2+1-frac1x+1right)=0tag3$$



    Starting with $(3)$, is tantamount to starting with the real part of $(1)$ and we are done.





    So, what are other ways to prove the coveted relationship using real analysis tools only?











    share|cite|improve this question











    $endgroup$














      1












      1








      1


      1



      $begingroup$


      In this question, the OP asked to prove that $-int_x^infty fraccos(t)t,dt=gamma+log(x)+int_0^x fraccos(t)-1t,dt$, where $gamma $ is the Euler-Mascheroni constant. However, the two posted answers are incomplete and seem unsatisfactory.




      Using Complex Anaysis



      One can show for $x>0$ that $-int_x^infty fraccos(t)t,dt=gamma+log(x)+int_0^x fraccos(t)-1t,dt$ using contour integration. To wit, Cauchy's Integral Theorem guarantees that



      $$beginalign
      0&=oint_C frace^izz,dz\\
      &=int_epsilon^R frace^ixx,dx +int_0^pi/2frace^iRe^iphiRe^iphi,iRe^iphi,dphi+int_R^epsilon frace^-xix,i,dx+int_pi/2^0 frace^iepsilon e^iphiepsilon e^iphi,iepsilon e^iphi,dphi\\
      &=int_epsilon^R frace^ixx,dx -int_epsilon^R frace^-xx,dx-ifracpi2+O(epsilon)+Oleft(frac1Rright)tag1
      endalign$$



      whence after taking the real part of both sides of $(1$ and integrating by parts the integral $int_epsilon^R frace^-xx,dx$ with $u=e^-x$ and $v=log(x)$, we find



      $$beginalign-int_x^R fraccos(x')x',dx'&=log(x)-int_epsilon^R e^-xlog(x),dx+int_epsilon^xfraccos(x')-1x',dx'\\
      &-log(epsilon) -e^-Rlog(R)+e^-epsilonlog(epsilon)+Oleft(frac1Rright)+O(epsilon)tag2
      endalign$$



      Letting $Rtoinfty$ and $epsilonto 0$ in $(2)$ yields the sought relationship.




      Using Real Analysis
      Alternatively, we can use either the Laplace Transform or "Feynman's Trick" to show that



      $$int_0^infty fraccos(x)-e^-xx,dx=int_0^infty left(fracxx^2+1-frac1x+1right)=0tag3$$



      Starting with $(3)$, is tantamount to starting with the real part of $(1)$ and we are done.





      So, what are other ways to prove the coveted relationship using real analysis tools only?











      share|cite|improve this question











      $endgroup$




      In this question, the OP asked to prove that $-int_x^infty fraccos(t)t,dt=gamma+log(x)+int_0^x fraccos(t)-1t,dt$, where $gamma $ is the Euler-Mascheroni constant. However, the two posted answers are incomplete and seem unsatisfactory.




      Using Complex Anaysis



      One can show for $x>0$ that $-int_x^infty fraccos(t)t,dt=gamma+log(x)+int_0^x fraccos(t)-1t,dt$ using contour integration. To wit, Cauchy's Integral Theorem guarantees that



      $$beginalign
      0&=oint_C frace^izz,dz\\
      &=int_epsilon^R frace^ixx,dx +int_0^pi/2frace^iRe^iphiRe^iphi,iRe^iphi,dphi+int_R^epsilon frace^-xix,i,dx+int_pi/2^0 frace^iepsilon e^iphiepsilon e^iphi,iepsilon e^iphi,dphi\\
      &=int_epsilon^R frace^ixx,dx -int_epsilon^R frace^-xx,dx-ifracpi2+O(epsilon)+Oleft(frac1Rright)tag1
      endalign$$



      whence after taking the real part of both sides of $(1$ and integrating by parts the integral $int_epsilon^R frace^-xx,dx$ with $u=e^-x$ and $v=log(x)$, we find



      $$beginalign-int_x^R fraccos(x')x',dx'&=log(x)-int_epsilon^R e^-xlog(x),dx+int_epsilon^xfraccos(x')-1x',dx'\\
      &-log(epsilon) -e^-Rlog(R)+e^-epsilonlog(epsilon)+Oleft(frac1Rright)+O(epsilon)tag2
      endalign$$



      Letting $Rtoinfty$ and $epsilonto 0$ in $(2)$ yields the sought relationship.




      Using Real Analysis
      Alternatively, we can use either the Laplace Transform or "Feynman's Trick" to show that



      $$int_0^infty fraccos(x)-e^-xx,dx=int_0^infty left(fracxx^2+1-frac1x+1right)=0tag3$$



      Starting with $(3)$, is tantamount to starting with the real part of $(1)$ and we are done.





      So, what are other ways to prove the coveted relationship using real analysis tools only?








      real-analysis special-functions






      share|cite|improve this question















      share|cite|improve this question













      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question








      edited 2 days ago







      Mark Viola

















      asked Feb 28 at 5:09









      Mark ViolaMark Viola

      133k1278176




      133k1278176




















          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          0












          $begingroup$

          Note that for each $x>0$, the improper integral $int_x^inftyfraccos(t)tdt$
          converges conditionally (in the sense that $lim_Arightarrowinftyint_x^Afraccos(t)tdt$
          exists but $lim_Arightarrowinftyint_x^Aleft|fraccos(t)tright|dt=infty$).
          Define $F:(0,infty)rightarrowmathbbR$ by $F(x)=int_x^inftyfraccos(t)tdt$.
          Note that we still have $F'(x)=-fraccos(x)x$. For,
          begineqnarray*
          F'(x) & = & lim_hrightarrow0fracint_x+h^inftyfraccos(t)tdt-int_x^inftyfraccos(t)tdth\
          & = & -lim_hrightarrow0fracint_x^x+hfraccos(t)tdth\
          & = & -fraccos(x)x.
          endeqnarray*



          On the other hand, $0$ in the integral $int_0^xfraccos(t)-1tdt$
          is a removable singularity. For $tneq0$, we have
          begineqnarray*
          fraccos(t)-1t & = & frac(1-frac12!t^2+frac14!t^4-cdots)-1t\
          & = & -frac12!t+frac14!t^3-frac16!t^5+cdots.
          endeqnarray*

          Define $phi:mathbbRrightarrowmathbbR$ by $phi(t)=-frac12!t+frac14!t^3-frac16!t^5+cdots$.
          It can be proved that the power series converges everywhere (using
          root-test), and hence $phi$ is an analytic function. Therefore $int_0^xfraccos(t)-1tdt=int_0^xphi(t)dt$.



          Now $fracddxint_0^xfraccos(t)-1tdt=fraccos(x)-1x$.



          Finally, define $G:(0,infty)rightarrowmathbbR$ by
          $$
          G(x)=int_x^inftyfraccos(t)tdt-left[ln(x)+int_0^xfraccos(t)-1tdtright].
          $$

          Then $G$ is differentiable and $G'(x)=-fraccos(x)x-frac1x-fraccos(x)-1x=0$.
          This shows that $G$ is a constant function.






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$












          • $begingroup$
            You have not evaluated the constant, which renders this development incomplete. But I appreciate your attempt.
            $endgroup$
            – Mark Viola
            Mar 16 at 16:49











          • $begingroup$
            I thought that you just asked to prove that there exists a constant $gamma$ such that ... You did not ask explicitly "compute the value of $gamma$".
            $endgroup$
            – Danny Pak-Keung Chan
            Mar 16 at 16:59











          • $begingroup$
            Read the question of the OP. "Real Analysis Methodologies to Prove $-int_x^infty fraccos(t)t,dt=gamma+log(x)+int_0^x fraccos(t)-1t,dt$ for $x>0$." The constant $gamma$ is explicitly written. How did you infer that I was interested in something considerably less than that. Furthermore, in the body of the question, I actually show two derivations that include $gamma$.
            $endgroup$
            – Mark Viola
            Mar 16 at 17:08











          • $begingroup$
            I interpret that line as "Prove that there exists $gamma$ such that ... for all $x>0$.
            $endgroup$
            – Danny Pak-Keung Chan
            Mar 16 at 17:12






          • 1




            $begingroup$
            You should state explicitly: Compute the value $gamma$ and express it in close-form. Otherwise, I can write $gamma = G(1) = int_1^infty fraccos tt dt - int_0^1 fraccos t -1t dt$.
            $endgroup$
            – Danny Pak-Keung Chan
            Mar 16 at 17:17











          Your Answer





          StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
          return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
          StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
          StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
          );
          );
          , "mathjax-editing");

          StackExchange.ready(function()
          var channelOptions =
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "69"
          ;
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
          createEditor();
          );

          else
          createEditor();

          );

          function createEditor()
          StackExchange.prepareEditor(
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
          convertImagesToLinks: true,
          noModals: true,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: 10,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          imageUploader:
          brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
          contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
          allowUrls: true
          ,
          noCode: true, onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          );



          );













          draft saved

          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function ()
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3129759%2freal-analysis-methodologies-to-prove-int-x-infty-frac-costt-dt-gamm%23new-answer', 'question_page');

          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown

























          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes








          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes









          0












          $begingroup$

          Note that for each $x>0$, the improper integral $int_x^inftyfraccos(t)tdt$
          converges conditionally (in the sense that $lim_Arightarrowinftyint_x^Afraccos(t)tdt$
          exists but $lim_Arightarrowinftyint_x^Aleft|fraccos(t)tright|dt=infty$).
          Define $F:(0,infty)rightarrowmathbbR$ by $F(x)=int_x^inftyfraccos(t)tdt$.
          Note that we still have $F'(x)=-fraccos(x)x$. For,
          begineqnarray*
          F'(x) & = & lim_hrightarrow0fracint_x+h^inftyfraccos(t)tdt-int_x^inftyfraccos(t)tdth\
          & = & -lim_hrightarrow0fracint_x^x+hfraccos(t)tdth\
          & = & -fraccos(x)x.
          endeqnarray*



          On the other hand, $0$ in the integral $int_0^xfraccos(t)-1tdt$
          is a removable singularity. For $tneq0$, we have
          begineqnarray*
          fraccos(t)-1t & = & frac(1-frac12!t^2+frac14!t^4-cdots)-1t\
          & = & -frac12!t+frac14!t^3-frac16!t^5+cdots.
          endeqnarray*

          Define $phi:mathbbRrightarrowmathbbR$ by $phi(t)=-frac12!t+frac14!t^3-frac16!t^5+cdots$.
          It can be proved that the power series converges everywhere (using
          root-test), and hence $phi$ is an analytic function. Therefore $int_0^xfraccos(t)-1tdt=int_0^xphi(t)dt$.



          Now $fracddxint_0^xfraccos(t)-1tdt=fraccos(x)-1x$.



          Finally, define $G:(0,infty)rightarrowmathbbR$ by
          $$
          G(x)=int_x^inftyfraccos(t)tdt-left[ln(x)+int_0^xfraccos(t)-1tdtright].
          $$

          Then $G$ is differentiable and $G'(x)=-fraccos(x)x-frac1x-fraccos(x)-1x=0$.
          This shows that $G$ is a constant function.






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$












          • $begingroup$
            You have not evaluated the constant, which renders this development incomplete. But I appreciate your attempt.
            $endgroup$
            – Mark Viola
            Mar 16 at 16:49











          • $begingroup$
            I thought that you just asked to prove that there exists a constant $gamma$ such that ... You did not ask explicitly "compute the value of $gamma$".
            $endgroup$
            – Danny Pak-Keung Chan
            Mar 16 at 16:59











          • $begingroup$
            Read the question of the OP. "Real Analysis Methodologies to Prove $-int_x^infty fraccos(t)t,dt=gamma+log(x)+int_0^x fraccos(t)-1t,dt$ for $x>0$." The constant $gamma$ is explicitly written. How did you infer that I was interested in something considerably less than that. Furthermore, in the body of the question, I actually show two derivations that include $gamma$.
            $endgroup$
            – Mark Viola
            Mar 16 at 17:08











          • $begingroup$
            I interpret that line as "Prove that there exists $gamma$ such that ... for all $x>0$.
            $endgroup$
            – Danny Pak-Keung Chan
            Mar 16 at 17:12






          • 1




            $begingroup$
            You should state explicitly: Compute the value $gamma$ and express it in close-form. Otherwise, I can write $gamma = G(1) = int_1^infty fraccos tt dt - int_0^1 fraccos t -1t dt$.
            $endgroup$
            – Danny Pak-Keung Chan
            Mar 16 at 17:17
















          0












          $begingroup$

          Note that for each $x>0$, the improper integral $int_x^inftyfraccos(t)tdt$
          converges conditionally (in the sense that $lim_Arightarrowinftyint_x^Afraccos(t)tdt$
          exists but $lim_Arightarrowinftyint_x^Aleft|fraccos(t)tright|dt=infty$).
          Define $F:(0,infty)rightarrowmathbbR$ by $F(x)=int_x^inftyfraccos(t)tdt$.
          Note that we still have $F'(x)=-fraccos(x)x$. For,
          begineqnarray*
          F'(x) & = & lim_hrightarrow0fracint_x+h^inftyfraccos(t)tdt-int_x^inftyfraccos(t)tdth\
          & = & -lim_hrightarrow0fracint_x^x+hfraccos(t)tdth\
          & = & -fraccos(x)x.
          endeqnarray*



          On the other hand, $0$ in the integral $int_0^xfraccos(t)-1tdt$
          is a removable singularity. For $tneq0$, we have
          begineqnarray*
          fraccos(t)-1t & = & frac(1-frac12!t^2+frac14!t^4-cdots)-1t\
          & = & -frac12!t+frac14!t^3-frac16!t^5+cdots.
          endeqnarray*

          Define $phi:mathbbRrightarrowmathbbR$ by $phi(t)=-frac12!t+frac14!t^3-frac16!t^5+cdots$.
          It can be proved that the power series converges everywhere (using
          root-test), and hence $phi$ is an analytic function. Therefore $int_0^xfraccos(t)-1tdt=int_0^xphi(t)dt$.



          Now $fracddxint_0^xfraccos(t)-1tdt=fraccos(x)-1x$.



          Finally, define $G:(0,infty)rightarrowmathbbR$ by
          $$
          G(x)=int_x^inftyfraccos(t)tdt-left[ln(x)+int_0^xfraccos(t)-1tdtright].
          $$

          Then $G$ is differentiable and $G'(x)=-fraccos(x)x-frac1x-fraccos(x)-1x=0$.
          This shows that $G$ is a constant function.






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$












          • $begingroup$
            You have not evaluated the constant, which renders this development incomplete. But I appreciate your attempt.
            $endgroup$
            – Mark Viola
            Mar 16 at 16:49











          • $begingroup$
            I thought that you just asked to prove that there exists a constant $gamma$ such that ... You did not ask explicitly "compute the value of $gamma$".
            $endgroup$
            – Danny Pak-Keung Chan
            Mar 16 at 16:59











          • $begingroup$
            Read the question of the OP. "Real Analysis Methodologies to Prove $-int_x^infty fraccos(t)t,dt=gamma+log(x)+int_0^x fraccos(t)-1t,dt$ for $x>0$." The constant $gamma$ is explicitly written. How did you infer that I was interested in something considerably less than that. Furthermore, in the body of the question, I actually show two derivations that include $gamma$.
            $endgroup$
            – Mark Viola
            Mar 16 at 17:08











          • $begingroup$
            I interpret that line as "Prove that there exists $gamma$ such that ... for all $x>0$.
            $endgroup$
            – Danny Pak-Keung Chan
            Mar 16 at 17:12






          • 1




            $begingroup$
            You should state explicitly: Compute the value $gamma$ and express it in close-form. Otherwise, I can write $gamma = G(1) = int_1^infty fraccos tt dt - int_0^1 fraccos t -1t dt$.
            $endgroup$
            – Danny Pak-Keung Chan
            Mar 16 at 17:17














          0












          0








          0





          $begingroup$

          Note that for each $x>0$, the improper integral $int_x^inftyfraccos(t)tdt$
          converges conditionally (in the sense that $lim_Arightarrowinftyint_x^Afraccos(t)tdt$
          exists but $lim_Arightarrowinftyint_x^Aleft|fraccos(t)tright|dt=infty$).
          Define $F:(0,infty)rightarrowmathbbR$ by $F(x)=int_x^inftyfraccos(t)tdt$.
          Note that we still have $F'(x)=-fraccos(x)x$. For,
          begineqnarray*
          F'(x) & = & lim_hrightarrow0fracint_x+h^inftyfraccos(t)tdt-int_x^inftyfraccos(t)tdth\
          & = & -lim_hrightarrow0fracint_x^x+hfraccos(t)tdth\
          & = & -fraccos(x)x.
          endeqnarray*



          On the other hand, $0$ in the integral $int_0^xfraccos(t)-1tdt$
          is a removable singularity. For $tneq0$, we have
          begineqnarray*
          fraccos(t)-1t & = & frac(1-frac12!t^2+frac14!t^4-cdots)-1t\
          & = & -frac12!t+frac14!t^3-frac16!t^5+cdots.
          endeqnarray*

          Define $phi:mathbbRrightarrowmathbbR$ by $phi(t)=-frac12!t+frac14!t^3-frac16!t^5+cdots$.
          It can be proved that the power series converges everywhere (using
          root-test), and hence $phi$ is an analytic function. Therefore $int_0^xfraccos(t)-1tdt=int_0^xphi(t)dt$.



          Now $fracddxint_0^xfraccos(t)-1tdt=fraccos(x)-1x$.



          Finally, define $G:(0,infty)rightarrowmathbbR$ by
          $$
          G(x)=int_x^inftyfraccos(t)tdt-left[ln(x)+int_0^xfraccos(t)-1tdtright].
          $$

          Then $G$ is differentiable and $G'(x)=-fraccos(x)x-frac1x-fraccos(x)-1x=0$.
          This shows that $G$ is a constant function.






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$



          Note that for each $x>0$, the improper integral $int_x^inftyfraccos(t)tdt$
          converges conditionally (in the sense that $lim_Arightarrowinftyint_x^Afraccos(t)tdt$
          exists but $lim_Arightarrowinftyint_x^Aleft|fraccos(t)tright|dt=infty$).
          Define $F:(0,infty)rightarrowmathbbR$ by $F(x)=int_x^inftyfraccos(t)tdt$.
          Note that we still have $F'(x)=-fraccos(x)x$. For,
          begineqnarray*
          F'(x) & = & lim_hrightarrow0fracint_x+h^inftyfraccos(t)tdt-int_x^inftyfraccos(t)tdth\
          & = & -lim_hrightarrow0fracint_x^x+hfraccos(t)tdth\
          & = & -fraccos(x)x.
          endeqnarray*



          On the other hand, $0$ in the integral $int_0^xfraccos(t)-1tdt$
          is a removable singularity. For $tneq0$, we have
          begineqnarray*
          fraccos(t)-1t & = & frac(1-frac12!t^2+frac14!t^4-cdots)-1t\
          & = & -frac12!t+frac14!t^3-frac16!t^5+cdots.
          endeqnarray*

          Define $phi:mathbbRrightarrowmathbbR$ by $phi(t)=-frac12!t+frac14!t^3-frac16!t^5+cdots$.
          It can be proved that the power series converges everywhere (using
          root-test), and hence $phi$ is an analytic function. Therefore $int_0^xfraccos(t)-1tdt=int_0^xphi(t)dt$.



          Now $fracddxint_0^xfraccos(t)-1tdt=fraccos(x)-1x$.



          Finally, define $G:(0,infty)rightarrowmathbbR$ by
          $$
          G(x)=int_x^inftyfraccos(t)tdt-left[ln(x)+int_0^xfraccos(t)-1tdtright].
          $$

          Then $G$ is differentiable and $G'(x)=-fraccos(x)x-frac1x-fraccos(x)-1x=0$.
          This shows that $G$ is a constant function.







          share|cite|improve this answer












          share|cite|improve this answer



          share|cite|improve this answer










          answered Mar 16 at 16:28









          Danny Pak-Keung ChanDanny Pak-Keung Chan

          2,50938




          2,50938











          • $begingroup$
            You have not evaluated the constant, which renders this development incomplete. But I appreciate your attempt.
            $endgroup$
            – Mark Viola
            Mar 16 at 16:49











          • $begingroup$
            I thought that you just asked to prove that there exists a constant $gamma$ such that ... You did not ask explicitly "compute the value of $gamma$".
            $endgroup$
            – Danny Pak-Keung Chan
            Mar 16 at 16:59











          • $begingroup$
            Read the question of the OP. "Real Analysis Methodologies to Prove $-int_x^infty fraccos(t)t,dt=gamma+log(x)+int_0^x fraccos(t)-1t,dt$ for $x>0$." The constant $gamma$ is explicitly written. How did you infer that I was interested in something considerably less than that. Furthermore, in the body of the question, I actually show two derivations that include $gamma$.
            $endgroup$
            – Mark Viola
            Mar 16 at 17:08











          • $begingroup$
            I interpret that line as "Prove that there exists $gamma$ such that ... for all $x>0$.
            $endgroup$
            – Danny Pak-Keung Chan
            Mar 16 at 17:12






          • 1




            $begingroup$
            You should state explicitly: Compute the value $gamma$ and express it in close-form. Otherwise, I can write $gamma = G(1) = int_1^infty fraccos tt dt - int_0^1 fraccos t -1t dt$.
            $endgroup$
            – Danny Pak-Keung Chan
            Mar 16 at 17:17

















          • $begingroup$
            You have not evaluated the constant, which renders this development incomplete. But I appreciate your attempt.
            $endgroup$
            – Mark Viola
            Mar 16 at 16:49











          • $begingroup$
            I thought that you just asked to prove that there exists a constant $gamma$ such that ... You did not ask explicitly "compute the value of $gamma$".
            $endgroup$
            – Danny Pak-Keung Chan
            Mar 16 at 16:59











          • $begingroup$
            Read the question of the OP. "Real Analysis Methodologies to Prove $-int_x^infty fraccos(t)t,dt=gamma+log(x)+int_0^x fraccos(t)-1t,dt$ for $x>0$." The constant $gamma$ is explicitly written. How did you infer that I was interested in something considerably less than that. Furthermore, in the body of the question, I actually show two derivations that include $gamma$.
            $endgroup$
            – Mark Viola
            Mar 16 at 17:08











          • $begingroup$
            I interpret that line as "Prove that there exists $gamma$ such that ... for all $x>0$.
            $endgroup$
            – Danny Pak-Keung Chan
            Mar 16 at 17:12






          • 1




            $begingroup$
            You should state explicitly: Compute the value $gamma$ and express it in close-form. Otherwise, I can write $gamma = G(1) = int_1^infty fraccos tt dt - int_0^1 fraccos t -1t dt$.
            $endgroup$
            – Danny Pak-Keung Chan
            Mar 16 at 17:17
















          $begingroup$
          You have not evaluated the constant, which renders this development incomplete. But I appreciate your attempt.
          $endgroup$
          – Mark Viola
          Mar 16 at 16:49





          $begingroup$
          You have not evaluated the constant, which renders this development incomplete. But I appreciate your attempt.
          $endgroup$
          – Mark Viola
          Mar 16 at 16:49













          $begingroup$
          I thought that you just asked to prove that there exists a constant $gamma$ such that ... You did not ask explicitly "compute the value of $gamma$".
          $endgroup$
          – Danny Pak-Keung Chan
          Mar 16 at 16:59





          $begingroup$
          I thought that you just asked to prove that there exists a constant $gamma$ such that ... You did not ask explicitly "compute the value of $gamma$".
          $endgroup$
          – Danny Pak-Keung Chan
          Mar 16 at 16:59













          $begingroup$
          Read the question of the OP. "Real Analysis Methodologies to Prove $-int_x^infty fraccos(t)t,dt=gamma+log(x)+int_0^x fraccos(t)-1t,dt$ for $x>0$." The constant $gamma$ is explicitly written. How did you infer that I was interested in something considerably less than that. Furthermore, in the body of the question, I actually show two derivations that include $gamma$.
          $endgroup$
          – Mark Viola
          Mar 16 at 17:08





          $begingroup$
          Read the question of the OP. "Real Analysis Methodologies to Prove $-int_x^infty fraccos(t)t,dt=gamma+log(x)+int_0^x fraccos(t)-1t,dt$ for $x>0$." The constant $gamma$ is explicitly written. How did you infer that I was interested in something considerably less than that. Furthermore, in the body of the question, I actually show two derivations that include $gamma$.
          $endgroup$
          – Mark Viola
          Mar 16 at 17:08













          $begingroup$
          I interpret that line as "Prove that there exists $gamma$ such that ... for all $x>0$.
          $endgroup$
          – Danny Pak-Keung Chan
          Mar 16 at 17:12




          $begingroup$
          I interpret that line as "Prove that there exists $gamma$ such that ... for all $x>0$.
          $endgroup$
          – Danny Pak-Keung Chan
          Mar 16 at 17:12




          1




          1




          $begingroup$
          You should state explicitly: Compute the value $gamma$ and express it in close-form. Otherwise, I can write $gamma = G(1) = int_1^infty fraccos tt dt - int_0^1 fraccos t -1t dt$.
          $endgroup$
          – Danny Pak-Keung Chan
          Mar 16 at 17:17





          $begingroup$
          You should state explicitly: Compute the value $gamma$ and express it in close-form. Otherwise, I can write $gamma = G(1) = int_1^infty fraccos tt dt - int_0^1 fraccos t -1t dt$.
          $endgroup$
          – Danny Pak-Keung Chan
          Mar 16 at 17:17


















          draft saved

          draft discarded
















































          Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

          But avoid


          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

          Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




          draft saved


          draft discarded














          StackExchange.ready(
          function ()
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3129759%2freal-analysis-methodologies-to-prove-int-x-infty-frac-costt-dt-gamm%23new-answer', 'question_page');

          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown





















































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown

































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown







          Popular posts from this blog

          Solar Wings Breeze Design and development Specifications (Breeze) References Navigation menu1368-485X"Hang glider: Breeze (Solar Wings)"e

          Kathakali Contents Etymology and nomenclature History Repertoire Songs and musical instruments Traditional plays Styles: Sampradayam Training centers and awards Relationship to other dance forms See also Notes References External links Navigation menueThe Illustrated Encyclopedia of Hinduism: A-MSouth Asian Folklore: An EncyclopediaRoutledge International Encyclopedia of Women: Global Women's Issues and KnowledgeKathakali Dance-drama: Where Gods and Demons Come to PlayKathakali Dance-drama: Where Gods and Demons Come to PlayKathakali Dance-drama: Where Gods and Demons Come to Play10.1353/atj.2005.0004The Illustrated Encyclopedia of Hinduism: A-MEncyclopedia of HinduismKathakali Dance-drama: Where Gods and Demons Come to PlaySonic Liturgy: Ritual and Music in Hindu Tradition"The Mirror of Gesture"Kathakali Dance-drama: Where Gods and Demons Come to Play"Kathakali"Indian Theatre: Traditions of PerformanceIndian Theatre: Traditions of PerformanceIndian Theatre: Traditions of PerformanceIndian Theatre: Traditions of PerformanceMedieval Indian Literature: An AnthologyThe Oxford Companion to Indian TheatreSouth Asian Folklore: An Encyclopedia : Afghanistan, Bangladesh, India, Nepal, Pakistan, Sri LankaThe Rise of Performance Studies: Rethinking Richard Schechner's Broad SpectrumIndian Theatre: Traditions of PerformanceModern Asian Theatre and Performance 1900-2000Critical Theory and PerformanceBetween Theater and AnthropologyKathakali603847011Indian Theatre: Traditions of PerformanceIndian Theatre: Traditions of PerformanceIndian Theatre: Traditions of PerformanceBetween Theater and AnthropologyBetween Theater and AnthropologyNambeesan Smaraka AwardsArchivedThe Cambridge Guide to TheatreRoutledge International Encyclopedia of Women: Global Women's Issues and KnowledgeThe Garland Encyclopedia of World Music: South Asia : the Indian subcontinentThe Ethos of Noh: Actors and Their Art10.2307/1145740By Means of Performance: Intercultural Studies of Theatre and Ritual10.1017/s204912550000100xReconceiving the Renaissance: A Critical ReaderPerformance TheoryListening to Theatre: The Aural Dimension of Beijing Opera10.2307/1146013Kathakali: The Art of the Non-WorldlyOn KathakaliKathakali, the dance theatreThe Kathakali Complex: Performance & StructureKathakali Dance-Drama: Where Gods and Demons Come to Play10.1093/obo/9780195399318-0071Drama and Ritual of Early Hinduism"In the Shadow of Hollywood Orientalism: Authentic East Indian Dancing"10.1080/08949460490274013Sanskrit Play Production in Ancient IndiaIndian Music: History and StructureBharata, the Nāṭyaśāstra233639306Table of Contents2238067286469807Dance In Indian Painting10.2307/32047833204783Kathakali Dance-Theatre: A Visual Narrative of Sacred Indian MimeIndian Classical Dance: The Renaissance and BeyondKathakali: an indigenous art-form of Keralaeee

          Method to test if a number is a perfect power? Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara Planned maintenance scheduled April 23, 2019 at 00:00UTC (8:00pm US/Eastern)Detecting perfect squares faster than by extracting square rooteffective way to get the integer sequence A181392 from oeisA rarely mentioned fact about perfect powersHow many numbers such $n$ are there that $n<100,lfloorsqrtn rfloor mid n$Check perfect squareness by modulo division against multiple basesFor what pair of integers $(a,b)$ is $3^a + 7^b$ a perfect square.Do there exist any positive integers $n$ such that $lfloore^nrfloor$ is a perfect power? What is the probability that one exists?finding perfect power factors of an integerProve that the sequence contains a perfect square for any natural number $m $ in the domain of $f$ .Counting Perfect Powers