Computation of Riemann integralf is Riemann integrable?Riemann Integral of $f(x)=1$ if $x=frac1n$ where $ nin N$ or $0$ otherwiseRiemann Sum Integrability CheckUnderstanding the definition of the Riemann IntegralExamine if a piecewise-defined function is Riemann integrableQuestion about Darboux integral definitionProving a function is Riemann integrableShowing a specific piecewise function is not Riemann integrableShow that a function is not integrable but an iterated integral existChanging bounds of definite integral

Weird lines in Microsoft Word

How can a new country break out from a developed country without war?

Should a narrator ever describe things based on a character's view instead of facts?

Extract substring according to regexp with sed or grep

How can I, as DM, avoid the Conga Line of Death occurring when implementing some form of flanking rule?

Rendered textures different to 3D View

Why didn’t Eve recognize the little cockroach as a living organism?

Derivative of an interpolated function

Put the phone down / Put down the phone

How to split IPA spelling into syllables

Highest stage count that are used one right after the other?

Not hide and seek

When is the exact date for EOL of Ubuntu 14.04 LTS?

Make a Bowl of Alphabet Soup

Exposing a company lying about themselves in a tightly knit industry (videogames) : Is my career at risk on the long run?

Relations between homogeneous polynomials

Can you describe someone as luxurious? As in someone who likes luxurious things?

Capacitor electron flow

1 John in Luther’s Bibel

C++ lambda syntax

"Marked down as someone wanting to sell shares." What does that mean?

What is the tangent at a sharp point on a curve?

python displays `n` instead of breaking a line

Checking @@ROWCOUNT failing



Computation of Riemann integral


f is Riemann integrable?Riemann Integral of $f(x)=1$ if $x=frac1n$ where $ nin N$ or $0$ otherwiseRiemann Sum Integrability CheckUnderstanding the definition of the Riemann IntegralExamine if a piecewise-defined function is Riemann integrableQuestion about Darboux integral definitionProving a function is Riemann integrableShowing a specific piecewise function is not Riemann integrableShow that a function is not integrable but an iterated integral existChanging bounds of definite integral













-1












$begingroup$


Let $f:[0,1]$ $times$ $[0,1]$ $rightarrow$ $mathbbR$ where
beginarray
$f(x,y) =
begincases
1 & textif $x in$ $mathbbQ$ \
2y &textif $x notin$ $mathbbQ$
endcases
endarray



Compute the Upper and Lower Riemann Integrals
beginalign
overlineint_0^1f(x,y)dx && textand && underlineint_0^1f(x,y)dx
endalign

in terms of y and show that
beginalign*
int_0^1f(x,y)dy
endalign*

exists for each fixed x.



$textbfAttempt:$



if $y < 1/2$ since rationals are dense in irrational and vice versa, we know the infimum for the indicator function is 2y in any given interval for any partition and supremum is 1. If $y > 1/2$ then supremum is 2y and infimum is 1 for any given interval. However, I am not sure how to do the computation for lower and upper riemann integrals nor how to conclude the second part.



Thank you!










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$
















    -1












    $begingroup$


    Let $f:[0,1]$ $times$ $[0,1]$ $rightarrow$ $mathbbR$ where
    beginarray
    $f(x,y) =
    begincases
    1 & textif $x in$ $mathbbQ$ \
    2y &textif $x notin$ $mathbbQ$
    endcases
    endarray



    Compute the Upper and Lower Riemann Integrals
    beginalign
    overlineint_0^1f(x,y)dx && textand && underlineint_0^1f(x,y)dx
    endalign

    in terms of y and show that
    beginalign*
    int_0^1f(x,y)dy
    endalign*

    exists for each fixed x.



    $textbfAttempt:$



    if $y < 1/2$ since rationals are dense in irrational and vice versa, we know the infimum for the indicator function is 2y in any given interval for any partition and supremum is 1. If $y > 1/2$ then supremum is 2y and infimum is 1 for any given interval. However, I am not sure how to do the computation for lower and upper riemann integrals nor how to conclude the second part.



    Thank you!










    share|cite|improve this question











    $endgroup$














      -1












      -1








      -1





      $begingroup$


      Let $f:[0,1]$ $times$ $[0,1]$ $rightarrow$ $mathbbR$ where
      beginarray
      $f(x,y) =
      begincases
      1 & textif $x in$ $mathbbQ$ \
      2y &textif $x notin$ $mathbbQ$
      endcases
      endarray



      Compute the Upper and Lower Riemann Integrals
      beginalign
      overlineint_0^1f(x,y)dx && textand && underlineint_0^1f(x,y)dx
      endalign

      in terms of y and show that
      beginalign*
      int_0^1f(x,y)dy
      endalign*

      exists for each fixed x.



      $textbfAttempt:$



      if $y < 1/2$ since rationals are dense in irrational and vice versa, we know the infimum for the indicator function is 2y in any given interval for any partition and supremum is 1. If $y > 1/2$ then supremum is 2y and infimum is 1 for any given interval. However, I am not sure how to do the computation for lower and upper riemann integrals nor how to conclude the second part.



      Thank you!










      share|cite|improve this question











      $endgroup$




      Let $f:[0,1]$ $times$ $[0,1]$ $rightarrow$ $mathbbR$ where
      beginarray
      $f(x,y) =
      begincases
      1 & textif $x in$ $mathbbQ$ \
      2y &textif $x notin$ $mathbbQ$
      endcases
      endarray



      Compute the Upper and Lower Riemann Integrals
      beginalign
      overlineint_0^1f(x,y)dx && textand && underlineint_0^1f(x,y)dx
      endalign

      in terms of y and show that
      beginalign*
      int_0^1f(x,y)dy
      endalign*

      exists for each fixed x.



      $textbfAttempt:$



      if $y < 1/2$ since rationals are dense in irrational and vice versa, we know the infimum for the indicator function is 2y in any given interval for any partition and supremum is 1. If $y > 1/2$ then supremum is 2y and infimum is 1 for any given interval. However, I am not sure how to do the computation for lower and upper riemann integrals nor how to conclude the second part.



      Thank you!







      integration






      share|cite|improve this question















      share|cite|improve this question













      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question








      edited Mar 13 at 18:21







      Kaan Yolsever

















      asked Mar 13 at 17:59









      Kaan YolseverKaan Yolsever

      1309




      1309




















          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          1












          $begingroup$


          However, I am not sure how to do the computation for lower and upper riemann integrals nor how to conclude b.




          To do the computation: For the upper integral, integrate the supremum. For the lower integral, integrate the infimum.



          For the second part, note that it's talking about integrating with respect to the other variable. What is $f(x,y)$ for some fixed $x$?






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$












          • $begingroup$
            what do you mean integrate the supremum? Am I not supposed to take the sup/inf over all partitions to get the lower/upper riemann integral? And if so, I am not even sure how to assert the existence of this integral
            $endgroup$
            – Kaan Yolsever
            Mar 13 at 18:13











          • $begingroup$
            The formal definition of the integral is not generally a good way to actually compute the integral - but here it doesn't matter. Every partition has exactly the same upper sum and exactly the same lower sum.
            $endgroup$
            – jmerry
            Mar 13 at 18:23










          • $begingroup$
            I really don't know how to compute the lower and upper riemann integrals informally. Can I just take the integral of it? Isn't that assuming the integral exists which we are trying to prove in this case
            $endgroup$
            – Kaan Yolsever
            Mar 13 at 18:32











          • $begingroup$
            The upper and lower integrals always exist. The integral as a whole only exists if they're equal to each other - which, for the $dx$ integral here, isn't the case.
            $endgroup$
            – jmerry
            Mar 13 at 18:39










          • $begingroup$
            How can we know that $sup_P{sum_i M_i delta(x_i) $ always exists? Could you write out what you are claiming? I am having a hard time following
            $endgroup$
            – Kaan Yolsever
            Mar 13 at 18:44











          Your Answer





          StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
          return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
          StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
          StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
          );
          );
          , "mathjax-editing");

          StackExchange.ready(function()
          var channelOptions =
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "69"
          ;
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
          createEditor();
          );

          else
          createEditor();

          );

          function createEditor()
          StackExchange.prepareEditor(
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
          convertImagesToLinks: true,
          noModals: true,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: 10,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          imageUploader:
          brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
          contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
          allowUrls: true
          ,
          noCode: true, onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          );



          );













          draft saved

          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function ()
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3146942%2fcomputation-of-riemann-integral%23new-answer', 'question_page');

          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown

























          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes








          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes









          1












          $begingroup$


          However, I am not sure how to do the computation for lower and upper riemann integrals nor how to conclude b.




          To do the computation: For the upper integral, integrate the supremum. For the lower integral, integrate the infimum.



          For the second part, note that it's talking about integrating with respect to the other variable. What is $f(x,y)$ for some fixed $x$?






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$












          • $begingroup$
            what do you mean integrate the supremum? Am I not supposed to take the sup/inf over all partitions to get the lower/upper riemann integral? And if so, I am not even sure how to assert the existence of this integral
            $endgroup$
            – Kaan Yolsever
            Mar 13 at 18:13











          • $begingroup$
            The formal definition of the integral is not generally a good way to actually compute the integral - but here it doesn't matter. Every partition has exactly the same upper sum and exactly the same lower sum.
            $endgroup$
            – jmerry
            Mar 13 at 18:23










          • $begingroup$
            I really don't know how to compute the lower and upper riemann integrals informally. Can I just take the integral of it? Isn't that assuming the integral exists which we are trying to prove in this case
            $endgroup$
            – Kaan Yolsever
            Mar 13 at 18:32











          • $begingroup$
            The upper and lower integrals always exist. The integral as a whole only exists if they're equal to each other - which, for the $dx$ integral here, isn't the case.
            $endgroup$
            – jmerry
            Mar 13 at 18:39










          • $begingroup$
            How can we know that $sup_P{sum_i M_i delta(x_i) $ always exists? Could you write out what you are claiming? I am having a hard time following
            $endgroup$
            – Kaan Yolsever
            Mar 13 at 18:44
















          1












          $begingroup$


          However, I am not sure how to do the computation for lower and upper riemann integrals nor how to conclude b.




          To do the computation: For the upper integral, integrate the supremum. For the lower integral, integrate the infimum.



          For the second part, note that it's talking about integrating with respect to the other variable. What is $f(x,y)$ for some fixed $x$?






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$












          • $begingroup$
            what do you mean integrate the supremum? Am I not supposed to take the sup/inf over all partitions to get the lower/upper riemann integral? And if so, I am not even sure how to assert the existence of this integral
            $endgroup$
            – Kaan Yolsever
            Mar 13 at 18:13











          • $begingroup$
            The formal definition of the integral is not generally a good way to actually compute the integral - but here it doesn't matter. Every partition has exactly the same upper sum and exactly the same lower sum.
            $endgroup$
            – jmerry
            Mar 13 at 18:23










          • $begingroup$
            I really don't know how to compute the lower and upper riemann integrals informally. Can I just take the integral of it? Isn't that assuming the integral exists which we are trying to prove in this case
            $endgroup$
            – Kaan Yolsever
            Mar 13 at 18:32











          • $begingroup$
            The upper and lower integrals always exist. The integral as a whole only exists if they're equal to each other - which, for the $dx$ integral here, isn't the case.
            $endgroup$
            – jmerry
            Mar 13 at 18:39










          • $begingroup$
            How can we know that $sup_P{sum_i M_i delta(x_i) $ always exists? Could you write out what you are claiming? I am having a hard time following
            $endgroup$
            – Kaan Yolsever
            Mar 13 at 18:44














          1












          1








          1





          $begingroup$


          However, I am not sure how to do the computation for lower and upper riemann integrals nor how to conclude b.




          To do the computation: For the upper integral, integrate the supremum. For the lower integral, integrate the infimum.



          For the second part, note that it's talking about integrating with respect to the other variable. What is $f(x,y)$ for some fixed $x$?






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$




          However, I am not sure how to do the computation for lower and upper riemann integrals nor how to conclude b.




          To do the computation: For the upper integral, integrate the supremum. For the lower integral, integrate the infimum.



          For the second part, note that it's talking about integrating with respect to the other variable. What is $f(x,y)$ for some fixed $x$?







          share|cite|improve this answer












          share|cite|improve this answer



          share|cite|improve this answer










          answered Mar 13 at 18:11









          jmerryjmerry

          15k1632




          15k1632











          • $begingroup$
            what do you mean integrate the supremum? Am I not supposed to take the sup/inf over all partitions to get the lower/upper riemann integral? And if so, I am not even sure how to assert the existence of this integral
            $endgroup$
            – Kaan Yolsever
            Mar 13 at 18:13











          • $begingroup$
            The formal definition of the integral is not generally a good way to actually compute the integral - but here it doesn't matter. Every partition has exactly the same upper sum and exactly the same lower sum.
            $endgroup$
            – jmerry
            Mar 13 at 18:23










          • $begingroup$
            I really don't know how to compute the lower and upper riemann integrals informally. Can I just take the integral of it? Isn't that assuming the integral exists which we are trying to prove in this case
            $endgroup$
            – Kaan Yolsever
            Mar 13 at 18:32











          • $begingroup$
            The upper and lower integrals always exist. The integral as a whole only exists if they're equal to each other - which, for the $dx$ integral here, isn't the case.
            $endgroup$
            – jmerry
            Mar 13 at 18:39










          • $begingroup$
            How can we know that $sup_P{sum_i M_i delta(x_i) $ always exists? Could you write out what you are claiming? I am having a hard time following
            $endgroup$
            – Kaan Yolsever
            Mar 13 at 18:44

















          • $begingroup$
            what do you mean integrate the supremum? Am I not supposed to take the sup/inf over all partitions to get the lower/upper riemann integral? And if so, I am not even sure how to assert the existence of this integral
            $endgroup$
            – Kaan Yolsever
            Mar 13 at 18:13











          • $begingroup$
            The formal definition of the integral is not generally a good way to actually compute the integral - but here it doesn't matter. Every partition has exactly the same upper sum and exactly the same lower sum.
            $endgroup$
            – jmerry
            Mar 13 at 18:23










          • $begingroup$
            I really don't know how to compute the lower and upper riemann integrals informally. Can I just take the integral of it? Isn't that assuming the integral exists which we are trying to prove in this case
            $endgroup$
            – Kaan Yolsever
            Mar 13 at 18:32











          • $begingroup$
            The upper and lower integrals always exist. The integral as a whole only exists if they're equal to each other - which, for the $dx$ integral here, isn't the case.
            $endgroup$
            – jmerry
            Mar 13 at 18:39










          • $begingroup$
            How can we know that $sup_P{sum_i M_i delta(x_i) $ always exists? Could you write out what you are claiming? I am having a hard time following
            $endgroup$
            – Kaan Yolsever
            Mar 13 at 18:44
















          $begingroup$
          what do you mean integrate the supremum? Am I not supposed to take the sup/inf over all partitions to get the lower/upper riemann integral? And if so, I am not even sure how to assert the existence of this integral
          $endgroup$
          – Kaan Yolsever
          Mar 13 at 18:13





          $begingroup$
          what do you mean integrate the supremum? Am I not supposed to take the sup/inf over all partitions to get the lower/upper riemann integral? And if so, I am not even sure how to assert the existence of this integral
          $endgroup$
          – Kaan Yolsever
          Mar 13 at 18:13













          $begingroup$
          The formal definition of the integral is not generally a good way to actually compute the integral - but here it doesn't matter. Every partition has exactly the same upper sum and exactly the same lower sum.
          $endgroup$
          – jmerry
          Mar 13 at 18:23




          $begingroup$
          The formal definition of the integral is not generally a good way to actually compute the integral - but here it doesn't matter. Every partition has exactly the same upper sum and exactly the same lower sum.
          $endgroup$
          – jmerry
          Mar 13 at 18:23












          $begingroup$
          I really don't know how to compute the lower and upper riemann integrals informally. Can I just take the integral of it? Isn't that assuming the integral exists which we are trying to prove in this case
          $endgroup$
          – Kaan Yolsever
          Mar 13 at 18:32





          $begingroup$
          I really don't know how to compute the lower and upper riemann integrals informally. Can I just take the integral of it? Isn't that assuming the integral exists which we are trying to prove in this case
          $endgroup$
          – Kaan Yolsever
          Mar 13 at 18:32













          $begingroup$
          The upper and lower integrals always exist. The integral as a whole only exists if they're equal to each other - which, for the $dx$ integral here, isn't the case.
          $endgroup$
          – jmerry
          Mar 13 at 18:39




          $begingroup$
          The upper and lower integrals always exist. The integral as a whole only exists if they're equal to each other - which, for the $dx$ integral here, isn't the case.
          $endgroup$
          – jmerry
          Mar 13 at 18:39












          $begingroup$
          How can we know that $sup_P{sum_i M_i delta(x_i) $ always exists? Could you write out what you are claiming? I am having a hard time following
          $endgroup$
          – Kaan Yolsever
          Mar 13 at 18:44





          $begingroup$
          How can we know that $sup_P{sum_i M_i delta(x_i) $ always exists? Could you write out what you are claiming? I am having a hard time following
          $endgroup$
          – Kaan Yolsever
          Mar 13 at 18:44


















          draft saved

          draft discarded
















































          Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

          But avoid


          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

          Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




          draft saved


          draft discarded














          StackExchange.ready(
          function ()
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3146942%2fcomputation-of-riemann-integral%23new-answer', 'question_page');

          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown





















































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown

































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown







          Popular posts from this blog

          Solar Wings Breeze Design and development Specifications (Breeze) References Navigation menu1368-485X"Hang glider: Breeze (Solar Wings)"e

          Kathakali Contents Etymology and nomenclature History Repertoire Songs and musical instruments Traditional plays Styles: Sampradayam Training centers and awards Relationship to other dance forms See also Notes References External links Navigation menueThe Illustrated Encyclopedia of Hinduism: A-MSouth Asian Folklore: An EncyclopediaRoutledge International Encyclopedia of Women: Global Women's Issues and KnowledgeKathakali Dance-drama: Where Gods and Demons Come to PlayKathakali Dance-drama: Where Gods and Demons Come to PlayKathakali Dance-drama: Where Gods and Demons Come to Play10.1353/atj.2005.0004The Illustrated Encyclopedia of Hinduism: A-MEncyclopedia of HinduismKathakali Dance-drama: Where Gods and Demons Come to PlaySonic Liturgy: Ritual and Music in Hindu Tradition"The Mirror of Gesture"Kathakali Dance-drama: Where Gods and Demons Come to Play"Kathakali"Indian Theatre: Traditions of PerformanceIndian Theatre: Traditions of PerformanceIndian Theatre: Traditions of PerformanceIndian Theatre: Traditions of PerformanceMedieval Indian Literature: An AnthologyThe Oxford Companion to Indian TheatreSouth Asian Folklore: An Encyclopedia : Afghanistan, Bangladesh, India, Nepal, Pakistan, Sri LankaThe Rise of Performance Studies: Rethinking Richard Schechner's Broad SpectrumIndian Theatre: Traditions of PerformanceModern Asian Theatre and Performance 1900-2000Critical Theory and PerformanceBetween Theater and AnthropologyKathakali603847011Indian Theatre: Traditions of PerformanceIndian Theatre: Traditions of PerformanceIndian Theatre: Traditions of PerformanceBetween Theater and AnthropologyBetween Theater and AnthropologyNambeesan Smaraka AwardsArchivedThe Cambridge Guide to TheatreRoutledge International Encyclopedia of Women: Global Women's Issues and KnowledgeThe Garland Encyclopedia of World Music: South Asia : the Indian subcontinentThe Ethos of Noh: Actors and Their Art10.2307/1145740By Means of Performance: Intercultural Studies of Theatre and Ritual10.1017/s204912550000100xReconceiving the Renaissance: A Critical ReaderPerformance TheoryListening to Theatre: The Aural Dimension of Beijing Opera10.2307/1146013Kathakali: The Art of the Non-WorldlyOn KathakaliKathakali, the dance theatreThe Kathakali Complex: Performance & StructureKathakali Dance-Drama: Where Gods and Demons Come to Play10.1093/obo/9780195399318-0071Drama and Ritual of Early Hinduism"In the Shadow of Hollywood Orientalism: Authentic East Indian Dancing"10.1080/08949460490274013Sanskrit Play Production in Ancient IndiaIndian Music: History and StructureBharata, the Nāṭyaśāstra233639306Table of Contents2238067286469807Dance In Indian Painting10.2307/32047833204783Kathakali Dance-Theatre: A Visual Narrative of Sacred Indian MimeIndian Classical Dance: The Renaissance and BeyondKathakali: an indigenous art-form of Keralaeee

          Method to test if a number is a perfect power? Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara Planned maintenance scheduled April 23, 2019 at 00:00UTC (8:00pm US/Eastern)Detecting perfect squares faster than by extracting square rooteffective way to get the integer sequence A181392 from oeisA rarely mentioned fact about perfect powersHow many numbers such $n$ are there that $n<100,lfloorsqrtn rfloor mid n$Check perfect squareness by modulo division against multiple basesFor what pair of integers $(a,b)$ is $3^a + 7^b$ a perfect square.Do there exist any positive integers $n$ such that $lfloore^nrfloor$ is a perfect power? What is the probability that one exists?finding perfect power factors of an integerProve that the sequence contains a perfect square for any natural number $m $ in the domain of $f$ .Counting Perfect Powers