Computation of Riemann integralf is Riemann integrable?Riemann Integral of $f(x)=1$ if $x=frac1n$ where $ nin N$ or $0$ otherwiseRiemann Sum Integrability CheckUnderstanding the definition of the Riemann IntegralExamine if a piecewise-defined function is Riemann integrableQuestion about Darboux integral definitionProving a function is Riemann integrableShowing a specific piecewise function is not Riemann integrableShow that a function is not integrable but an iterated integral existChanging bounds of definite integral

Weird lines in Microsoft Word

How can a new country break out from a developed country without war?

Should a narrator ever describe things based on a character's view instead of facts?

Extract substring according to regexp with sed or grep

How can I, as DM, avoid the Conga Line of Death occurring when implementing some form of flanking rule?

Rendered textures different to 3D View

Why didn’t Eve recognize the little cockroach as a living organism?

Derivative of an interpolated function

Put the phone down / Put down the phone

How to split IPA spelling into syllables

Highest stage count that are used one right after the other?

Not hide and seek

When is the exact date for EOL of Ubuntu 14.04 LTS?

Make a Bowl of Alphabet Soup

Exposing a company lying about themselves in a tightly knit industry (videogames) : Is my career at risk on the long run?

Relations between homogeneous polynomials

Can you describe someone as luxurious? As in someone who likes luxurious things?

Capacitor electron flow

1 John in Luther’s Bibel

C++ lambda syntax

"Marked down as someone wanting to sell shares." What does that mean?

What is the tangent at a sharp point on a curve?

python displays `n` instead of breaking a line

Checking @@ROWCOUNT failing



Computation of Riemann integral


f is Riemann integrable?Riemann Integral of $f(x)=1$ if $x=frac1n$ where $ nin N$ or $0$ otherwiseRiemann Sum Integrability CheckUnderstanding the definition of the Riemann IntegralExamine if a piecewise-defined function is Riemann integrableQuestion about Darboux integral definitionProving a function is Riemann integrableShowing a specific piecewise function is not Riemann integrableShow that a function is not integrable but an iterated integral existChanging bounds of definite integral













-1












$begingroup$


Let $f:[0,1]$ $times$ $[0,1]$ $rightarrow$ $mathbbR$ where
beginarray
$f(x,y) =
begincases
1 & textif $x in$ $mathbbQ$ \
2y &textif $x notin$ $mathbbQ$
endcases
endarray



Compute the Upper and Lower Riemann Integrals
beginalign
overlineint_0^1f(x,y)dx && textand && underlineint_0^1f(x,y)dx
endalign

in terms of y and show that
beginalign*
int_0^1f(x,y)dy
endalign*

exists for each fixed x.



$textbfAttempt:$



if $y < 1/2$ since rationals are dense in irrational and vice versa, we know the infimum for the indicator function is 2y in any given interval for any partition and supremum is 1. If $y > 1/2$ then supremum is 2y and infimum is 1 for any given interval. However, I am not sure how to do the computation for lower and upper riemann integrals nor how to conclude the second part.



Thank you!










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$
















    -1












    $begingroup$


    Let $f:[0,1]$ $times$ $[0,1]$ $rightarrow$ $mathbbR$ where
    beginarray
    $f(x,y) =
    begincases
    1 & textif $x in$ $mathbbQ$ \
    2y &textif $x notin$ $mathbbQ$
    endcases
    endarray



    Compute the Upper and Lower Riemann Integrals
    beginalign
    overlineint_0^1f(x,y)dx && textand && underlineint_0^1f(x,y)dx
    endalign

    in terms of y and show that
    beginalign*
    int_0^1f(x,y)dy
    endalign*

    exists for each fixed x.



    $textbfAttempt:$



    if $y < 1/2$ since rationals are dense in irrational and vice versa, we know the infimum for the indicator function is 2y in any given interval for any partition and supremum is 1. If $y > 1/2$ then supremum is 2y and infimum is 1 for any given interval. However, I am not sure how to do the computation for lower and upper riemann integrals nor how to conclude the second part.



    Thank you!










    share|cite|improve this question











    $endgroup$














      -1












      -1








      -1





      $begingroup$


      Let $f:[0,1]$ $times$ $[0,1]$ $rightarrow$ $mathbbR$ where
      beginarray
      $f(x,y) =
      begincases
      1 & textif $x in$ $mathbbQ$ \
      2y &textif $x notin$ $mathbbQ$
      endcases
      endarray



      Compute the Upper and Lower Riemann Integrals
      beginalign
      overlineint_0^1f(x,y)dx && textand && underlineint_0^1f(x,y)dx
      endalign

      in terms of y and show that
      beginalign*
      int_0^1f(x,y)dy
      endalign*

      exists for each fixed x.



      $textbfAttempt:$



      if $y < 1/2$ since rationals are dense in irrational and vice versa, we know the infimum for the indicator function is 2y in any given interval for any partition and supremum is 1. If $y > 1/2$ then supremum is 2y and infimum is 1 for any given interval. However, I am not sure how to do the computation for lower and upper riemann integrals nor how to conclude the second part.



      Thank you!










      share|cite|improve this question











      $endgroup$




      Let $f:[0,1]$ $times$ $[0,1]$ $rightarrow$ $mathbbR$ where
      beginarray
      $f(x,y) =
      begincases
      1 & textif $x in$ $mathbbQ$ \
      2y &textif $x notin$ $mathbbQ$
      endcases
      endarray



      Compute the Upper and Lower Riemann Integrals
      beginalign
      overlineint_0^1f(x,y)dx && textand && underlineint_0^1f(x,y)dx
      endalign

      in terms of y and show that
      beginalign*
      int_0^1f(x,y)dy
      endalign*

      exists for each fixed x.



      $textbfAttempt:$



      if $y < 1/2$ since rationals are dense in irrational and vice versa, we know the infimum for the indicator function is 2y in any given interval for any partition and supremum is 1. If $y > 1/2$ then supremum is 2y and infimum is 1 for any given interval. However, I am not sure how to do the computation for lower and upper riemann integrals nor how to conclude the second part.



      Thank you!







      integration






      share|cite|improve this question















      share|cite|improve this question













      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question








      edited Mar 13 at 18:21







      Kaan Yolsever

















      asked Mar 13 at 17:59









      Kaan YolseverKaan Yolsever

      1309




      1309




















          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          1












          $begingroup$


          However, I am not sure how to do the computation for lower and upper riemann integrals nor how to conclude b.




          To do the computation: For the upper integral, integrate the supremum. For the lower integral, integrate the infimum.



          For the second part, note that it's talking about integrating with respect to the other variable. What is $f(x,y)$ for some fixed $x$?






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$












          • $begingroup$
            what do you mean integrate the supremum? Am I not supposed to take the sup/inf over all partitions to get the lower/upper riemann integral? And if so, I am not even sure how to assert the existence of this integral
            $endgroup$
            – Kaan Yolsever
            Mar 13 at 18:13











          • $begingroup$
            The formal definition of the integral is not generally a good way to actually compute the integral - but here it doesn't matter. Every partition has exactly the same upper sum and exactly the same lower sum.
            $endgroup$
            – jmerry
            Mar 13 at 18:23










          • $begingroup$
            I really don't know how to compute the lower and upper riemann integrals informally. Can I just take the integral of it? Isn't that assuming the integral exists which we are trying to prove in this case
            $endgroup$
            – Kaan Yolsever
            Mar 13 at 18:32











          • $begingroup$
            The upper and lower integrals always exist. The integral as a whole only exists if they're equal to each other - which, for the $dx$ integral here, isn't the case.
            $endgroup$
            – jmerry
            Mar 13 at 18:39










          • $begingroup$
            How can we know that $sup_P{sum_i M_i delta(x_i) $ always exists? Could you write out what you are claiming? I am having a hard time following
            $endgroup$
            – Kaan Yolsever
            Mar 13 at 18:44











          Your Answer





          StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
          return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
          StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
          StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
          );
          );
          , "mathjax-editing");

          StackExchange.ready(function()
          var channelOptions =
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "69"
          ;
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
          createEditor();
          );

          else
          createEditor();

          );

          function createEditor()
          StackExchange.prepareEditor(
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
          convertImagesToLinks: true,
          noModals: true,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: 10,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          imageUploader:
          brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
          contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
          allowUrls: true
          ,
          noCode: true, onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          );



          );













          draft saved

          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function ()
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3146942%2fcomputation-of-riemann-integral%23new-answer', 'question_page');

          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown

























          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes








          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes









          1












          $begingroup$


          However, I am not sure how to do the computation for lower and upper riemann integrals nor how to conclude b.




          To do the computation: For the upper integral, integrate the supremum. For the lower integral, integrate the infimum.



          For the second part, note that it's talking about integrating with respect to the other variable. What is $f(x,y)$ for some fixed $x$?






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$












          • $begingroup$
            what do you mean integrate the supremum? Am I not supposed to take the sup/inf over all partitions to get the lower/upper riemann integral? And if so, I am not even sure how to assert the existence of this integral
            $endgroup$
            – Kaan Yolsever
            Mar 13 at 18:13











          • $begingroup$
            The formal definition of the integral is not generally a good way to actually compute the integral - but here it doesn't matter. Every partition has exactly the same upper sum and exactly the same lower sum.
            $endgroup$
            – jmerry
            Mar 13 at 18:23










          • $begingroup$
            I really don't know how to compute the lower and upper riemann integrals informally. Can I just take the integral of it? Isn't that assuming the integral exists which we are trying to prove in this case
            $endgroup$
            – Kaan Yolsever
            Mar 13 at 18:32











          • $begingroup$
            The upper and lower integrals always exist. The integral as a whole only exists if they're equal to each other - which, for the $dx$ integral here, isn't the case.
            $endgroup$
            – jmerry
            Mar 13 at 18:39










          • $begingroup$
            How can we know that $sup_P{sum_i M_i delta(x_i) $ always exists? Could you write out what you are claiming? I am having a hard time following
            $endgroup$
            – Kaan Yolsever
            Mar 13 at 18:44
















          1












          $begingroup$


          However, I am not sure how to do the computation for lower and upper riemann integrals nor how to conclude b.




          To do the computation: For the upper integral, integrate the supremum. For the lower integral, integrate the infimum.



          For the second part, note that it's talking about integrating with respect to the other variable. What is $f(x,y)$ for some fixed $x$?






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$












          • $begingroup$
            what do you mean integrate the supremum? Am I not supposed to take the sup/inf over all partitions to get the lower/upper riemann integral? And if so, I am not even sure how to assert the existence of this integral
            $endgroup$
            – Kaan Yolsever
            Mar 13 at 18:13











          • $begingroup$
            The formal definition of the integral is not generally a good way to actually compute the integral - but here it doesn't matter. Every partition has exactly the same upper sum and exactly the same lower sum.
            $endgroup$
            – jmerry
            Mar 13 at 18:23










          • $begingroup$
            I really don't know how to compute the lower and upper riemann integrals informally. Can I just take the integral of it? Isn't that assuming the integral exists which we are trying to prove in this case
            $endgroup$
            – Kaan Yolsever
            Mar 13 at 18:32











          • $begingroup$
            The upper and lower integrals always exist. The integral as a whole only exists if they're equal to each other - which, for the $dx$ integral here, isn't the case.
            $endgroup$
            – jmerry
            Mar 13 at 18:39










          • $begingroup$
            How can we know that $sup_P{sum_i M_i delta(x_i) $ always exists? Could you write out what you are claiming? I am having a hard time following
            $endgroup$
            – Kaan Yolsever
            Mar 13 at 18:44














          1












          1








          1





          $begingroup$


          However, I am not sure how to do the computation for lower and upper riemann integrals nor how to conclude b.




          To do the computation: For the upper integral, integrate the supremum. For the lower integral, integrate the infimum.



          For the second part, note that it's talking about integrating with respect to the other variable. What is $f(x,y)$ for some fixed $x$?






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$




          However, I am not sure how to do the computation for lower and upper riemann integrals nor how to conclude b.




          To do the computation: For the upper integral, integrate the supremum. For the lower integral, integrate the infimum.



          For the second part, note that it's talking about integrating with respect to the other variable. What is $f(x,y)$ for some fixed $x$?







          share|cite|improve this answer












          share|cite|improve this answer



          share|cite|improve this answer










          answered Mar 13 at 18:11









          jmerryjmerry

          15k1632




          15k1632











          • $begingroup$
            what do you mean integrate the supremum? Am I not supposed to take the sup/inf over all partitions to get the lower/upper riemann integral? And if so, I am not even sure how to assert the existence of this integral
            $endgroup$
            – Kaan Yolsever
            Mar 13 at 18:13











          • $begingroup$
            The formal definition of the integral is not generally a good way to actually compute the integral - but here it doesn't matter. Every partition has exactly the same upper sum and exactly the same lower sum.
            $endgroup$
            – jmerry
            Mar 13 at 18:23










          • $begingroup$
            I really don't know how to compute the lower and upper riemann integrals informally. Can I just take the integral of it? Isn't that assuming the integral exists which we are trying to prove in this case
            $endgroup$
            – Kaan Yolsever
            Mar 13 at 18:32











          • $begingroup$
            The upper and lower integrals always exist. The integral as a whole only exists if they're equal to each other - which, for the $dx$ integral here, isn't the case.
            $endgroup$
            – jmerry
            Mar 13 at 18:39










          • $begingroup$
            How can we know that $sup_P{sum_i M_i delta(x_i) $ always exists? Could you write out what you are claiming? I am having a hard time following
            $endgroup$
            – Kaan Yolsever
            Mar 13 at 18:44

















          • $begingroup$
            what do you mean integrate the supremum? Am I not supposed to take the sup/inf over all partitions to get the lower/upper riemann integral? And if so, I am not even sure how to assert the existence of this integral
            $endgroup$
            – Kaan Yolsever
            Mar 13 at 18:13











          • $begingroup$
            The formal definition of the integral is not generally a good way to actually compute the integral - but here it doesn't matter. Every partition has exactly the same upper sum and exactly the same lower sum.
            $endgroup$
            – jmerry
            Mar 13 at 18:23










          • $begingroup$
            I really don't know how to compute the lower and upper riemann integrals informally. Can I just take the integral of it? Isn't that assuming the integral exists which we are trying to prove in this case
            $endgroup$
            – Kaan Yolsever
            Mar 13 at 18:32











          • $begingroup$
            The upper and lower integrals always exist. The integral as a whole only exists if they're equal to each other - which, for the $dx$ integral here, isn't the case.
            $endgroup$
            – jmerry
            Mar 13 at 18:39










          • $begingroup$
            How can we know that $sup_P{sum_i M_i delta(x_i) $ always exists? Could you write out what you are claiming? I am having a hard time following
            $endgroup$
            – Kaan Yolsever
            Mar 13 at 18:44
















          $begingroup$
          what do you mean integrate the supremum? Am I not supposed to take the sup/inf over all partitions to get the lower/upper riemann integral? And if so, I am not even sure how to assert the existence of this integral
          $endgroup$
          – Kaan Yolsever
          Mar 13 at 18:13





          $begingroup$
          what do you mean integrate the supremum? Am I not supposed to take the sup/inf over all partitions to get the lower/upper riemann integral? And if so, I am not even sure how to assert the existence of this integral
          $endgroup$
          – Kaan Yolsever
          Mar 13 at 18:13













          $begingroup$
          The formal definition of the integral is not generally a good way to actually compute the integral - but here it doesn't matter. Every partition has exactly the same upper sum and exactly the same lower sum.
          $endgroup$
          – jmerry
          Mar 13 at 18:23




          $begingroup$
          The formal definition of the integral is not generally a good way to actually compute the integral - but here it doesn't matter. Every partition has exactly the same upper sum and exactly the same lower sum.
          $endgroup$
          – jmerry
          Mar 13 at 18:23












          $begingroup$
          I really don't know how to compute the lower and upper riemann integrals informally. Can I just take the integral of it? Isn't that assuming the integral exists which we are trying to prove in this case
          $endgroup$
          – Kaan Yolsever
          Mar 13 at 18:32





          $begingroup$
          I really don't know how to compute the lower and upper riemann integrals informally. Can I just take the integral of it? Isn't that assuming the integral exists which we are trying to prove in this case
          $endgroup$
          – Kaan Yolsever
          Mar 13 at 18:32













          $begingroup$
          The upper and lower integrals always exist. The integral as a whole only exists if they're equal to each other - which, for the $dx$ integral here, isn't the case.
          $endgroup$
          – jmerry
          Mar 13 at 18:39




          $begingroup$
          The upper and lower integrals always exist. The integral as a whole only exists if they're equal to each other - which, for the $dx$ integral here, isn't the case.
          $endgroup$
          – jmerry
          Mar 13 at 18:39












          $begingroup$
          How can we know that $sup_P{sum_i M_i delta(x_i) $ always exists? Could you write out what you are claiming? I am having a hard time following
          $endgroup$
          – Kaan Yolsever
          Mar 13 at 18:44





          $begingroup$
          How can we know that $sup_P{sum_i M_i delta(x_i) $ always exists? Could you write out what you are claiming? I am having a hard time following
          $endgroup$
          – Kaan Yolsever
          Mar 13 at 18:44


















          draft saved

          draft discarded
















































          Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

          But avoid


          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

          Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




          draft saved


          draft discarded














          StackExchange.ready(
          function ()
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3146942%2fcomputation-of-riemann-integral%23new-answer', 'question_page');

          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown





















































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown

































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown







          Popular posts from this blog

          Lowndes Grove History Architecture References Navigation menu32°48′6″N 79°57′58″W / 32.80167°N 79.96611°W / 32.80167; -79.9661132°48′6″N 79°57′58″W / 32.80167°N 79.96611°W / 32.80167; -79.9661178002500"National Register Information System"Historic houses of South Carolina"Lowndes Grove""+32° 48' 6.00", −79° 57' 58.00""Lowndes Grove, Charleston County (260 St. Margaret St., Charleston)""Lowndes Grove"The Charleston ExpositionIt Happened in South Carolina"Lowndes Grove (House), Saint Margaret Street & Sixth Avenue, Charleston, Charleston County, SC(Photographs)"Plantations of the Carolina Low Countrye

          random experiment with two different functions on unit interval Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara Planned maintenance scheduled April 23, 2019 at 00:00UTC (8:00pm US/Eastern)Random variable and probability space notionsRandom Walk with EdgesFinding functions where the increase over a random interval is Poisson distributedNumber of days until dayCan an observed event in fact be of zero probability?Unit random processmodels of coins and uniform distributionHow to get the number of successes given $n$ trials , probability $P$ and a random variable $X$Absorbing Markov chain in a computer. Is “almost every” turned into always convergence in computer executions?Stopped random walk is not uniformly integrable

          How should I support this large drywall patch? Planned maintenance scheduled April 23, 2019 at 00:00UTC (8:00pm US/Eastern) Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara Unicorn Meta Zoo #1: Why another podcast?How do I cover large gaps in drywall?How do I keep drywall around a patch from crumbling?Can I glue a second layer of drywall?How to patch long strip on drywall?Large drywall patch: how to avoid bulging seams?Drywall Mesh Patch vs. Bulge? To remove or not to remove?How to fix this drywall job?Prep drywall before backsplashWhat's the best way to fix this horrible drywall patch job?Drywall patching using 3M Patch Plus Primer