Nonabelian dihedral groups and a question in number theory [duplicate]Is it true that a dihedral group is nonabelian?The center of the dihedral groupOn the centres of the dihedral groupsShowing that Ab(G) need not be completeProve that the dihedral group $D_4$ can not be written as a direct product of two groupsFind all $x$ in $D_4$ such that $ax(a^-1) = b$.Subgroups of generalized dihedral groupsHomomorphisms between Dihedral and Cyclic GroupsFind a permutation that satisfies this congruenceDefining dihedral groups $sigma in S_n: $ something $$Is it only the generator of the group that commutes with all the other elements?List of symmetric group elements from the usual presentation

Should I warn a new PhD Student?

How to test the sharpness of a knife?

Do people actually use the word "kaputt" in conversation?

Why is participating in the European Parliamentary elections used as a threat?

Is there a distance limit for minecart tracks?

What is the tangent at a sharp point on a curve?

Showing mass murder in a kid's book

Capacitor electron flow

What is the purpose of using a decision tree?

C++ lambda syntax

Can a Knock spell open the door to Mordenkainen's Magnificent Mansion?

Why do Radio Buttons not fill the entire outer circle?

Trouble reading roman numeral notation with flats

How do you justify more code being written by following clean code practices?

How do you say "Trust your struggle." in French?

Why would five hundred and five same as one?

Reasons for having MCU pin-states default to pull-up/down out of reset

Started in 1987 vs. Starting in 1987

Is divisi notation needed for brass or woodwind in an orchestra?

What can I do if I am asked to learn different programming languages very frequently?

Why is "la Gestapo" feminine?

Is there any common country to visit for persons holding UK and Schengen visas?

Are hand made posters acceptable in Academia?

Can you take a "free object interaction" while incapacitated?



Nonabelian dihedral groups and a question in number theory [duplicate]


Is it true that a dihedral group is nonabelian?The center of the dihedral groupOn the centres of the dihedral groupsShowing that Ab(G) need not be completeProve that the dihedral group $D_4$ can not be written as a direct product of two groupsFind all $x$ in $D_4$ such that $ax(a^-1) = b$.Subgroups of generalized dihedral groupsHomomorphisms between Dihedral and Cyclic GroupsFind a permutation that satisfies this congruenceDefining dihedral groups $sigma in S_n: $ something $$Is it only the generator of the group that commutes with all the other elements?List of symmetric group elements from the usual presentation













0












$begingroup$



This question already has an answer here:



  • Is it true that a dihedral group is nonabelian?

    5 answers



I'll use a concrete definition of a dihedral group $D_2n$ which emphasizes its group structure:




$D_2n$ consists of distinct elements $r_0,...,r_n-1,s_0,...,s_n-1$ so that for any $i in mathbbZ$ we have $r_i + n = r_i, s_i + n s_i$ and for any $i,j in mathbbZ$ we have $r_ir_j = r_i + j, r_is_j = s_i + j, s_ir_j = s_i - j, s_is_j = r_i - j$.




It's easy to see that all $r_i's$ commute in $D_2n$, hence the only elements for which it is possible not to commute are $s_i$ and $s_j$ or $r_i$ and $s_j$.



$s_is_j = s_js_i$ whenever $i - j equiv j - i bmod n$ and $r_is_j = s_jr_i$ whenever $i + j equiv i - j bmod n$, hence $D_2n$ is noncommutative if and only if either



  • there is $0 leq j < n$ so that $nnmid 2j$, or


  • there are $0 leq i,j < n$ so that $nnmid 2(i - j)$.


Using this result, it's not hard to establish that $D_2$ and $D_4$ are abelian.



I wonder how we can use this to prove that $D_2n$ is not abelian for $n geq 3$. I'm not interested in a possible geometric proof.










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$



marked as duplicate by Dietrich Burde group-theory
Users with the  group-theory badge can single-handedly close group-theory questions as duplicates and reopen them as needed.

StackExchange.ready(function()
if (StackExchange.options.isMobile) return;

$('.dupe-hammer-message-hover:not(.hover-bound)').each(function()
var $hover = $(this).addClass('hover-bound'),
$msg = $hover.siblings('.dupe-hammer-message');

$hover.hover(
function()
$hover.showInfoMessage('',
messageElement: $msg.clone().show(),
transient: false,
position: my: 'bottom left', at: 'top center', offsetTop: -7 ,
dismissable: false,
relativeToBody: true
);
,
function()
StackExchange.helpers.removeMessages();

);
);
);
Mar 13 at 19:46


This question has been asked before and already has an answer. If those answers do not fully address your question, please ask a new question.






















    0












    $begingroup$



    This question already has an answer here:



    • Is it true that a dihedral group is nonabelian?

      5 answers



    I'll use a concrete definition of a dihedral group $D_2n$ which emphasizes its group structure:




    $D_2n$ consists of distinct elements $r_0,...,r_n-1,s_0,...,s_n-1$ so that for any $i in mathbbZ$ we have $r_i + n = r_i, s_i + n s_i$ and for any $i,j in mathbbZ$ we have $r_ir_j = r_i + j, r_is_j = s_i + j, s_ir_j = s_i - j, s_is_j = r_i - j$.




    It's easy to see that all $r_i's$ commute in $D_2n$, hence the only elements for which it is possible not to commute are $s_i$ and $s_j$ or $r_i$ and $s_j$.



    $s_is_j = s_js_i$ whenever $i - j equiv j - i bmod n$ and $r_is_j = s_jr_i$ whenever $i + j equiv i - j bmod n$, hence $D_2n$ is noncommutative if and only if either



    • there is $0 leq j < n$ so that $nnmid 2j$, or


    • there are $0 leq i,j < n$ so that $nnmid 2(i - j)$.


    Using this result, it's not hard to establish that $D_2$ and $D_4$ are abelian.



    I wonder how we can use this to prove that $D_2n$ is not abelian for $n geq 3$. I'm not interested in a possible geometric proof.










    share|cite|improve this question









    $endgroup$



    marked as duplicate by Dietrich Burde group-theory
    Users with the  group-theory badge can single-handedly close group-theory questions as duplicates and reopen them as needed.

    StackExchange.ready(function()
    if (StackExchange.options.isMobile) return;

    $('.dupe-hammer-message-hover:not(.hover-bound)').each(function()
    var $hover = $(this).addClass('hover-bound'),
    $msg = $hover.siblings('.dupe-hammer-message');

    $hover.hover(
    function()
    $hover.showInfoMessage('',
    messageElement: $msg.clone().show(),
    transient: false,
    position: my: 'bottom left', at: 'top center', offsetTop: -7 ,
    dismissable: false,
    relativeToBody: true
    );
    ,
    function()
    StackExchange.helpers.removeMessages();

    );
    );
    );
    Mar 13 at 19:46


    This question has been asked before and already has an answer. If those answers do not fully address your question, please ask a new question.




















      0












      0








      0





      $begingroup$



      This question already has an answer here:



      • Is it true that a dihedral group is nonabelian?

        5 answers



      I'll use a concrete definition of a dihedral group $D_2n$ which emphasizes its group structure:




      $D_2n$ consists of distinct elements $r_0,...,r_n-1,s_0,...,s_n-1$ so that for any $i in mathbbZ$ we have $r_i + n = r_i, s_i + n s_i$ and for any $i,j in mathbbZ$ we have $r_ir_j = r_i + j, r_is_j = s_i + j, s_ir_j = s_i - j, s_is_j = r_i - j$.




      It's easy to see that all $r_i's$ commute in $D_2n$, hence the only elements for which it is possible not to commute are $s_i$ and $s_j$ or $r_i$ and $s_j$.



      $s_is_j = s_js_i$ whenever $i - j equiv j - i bmod n$ and $r_is_j = s_jr_i$ whenever $i + j equiv i - j bmod n$, hence $D_2n$ is noncommutative if and only if either



      • there is $0 leq j < n$ so that $nnmid 2j$, or


      • there are $0 leq i,j < n$ so that $nnmid 2(i - j)$.


      Using this result, it's not hard to establish that $D_2$ and $D_4$ are abelian.



      I wonder how we can use this to prove that $D_2n$ is not abelian for $n geq 3$. I'm not interested in a possible geometric proof.










      share|cite|improve this question









      $endgroup$





      This question already has an answer here:



      • Is it true that a dihedral group is nonabelian?

        5 answers



      I'll use a concrete definition of a dihedral group $D_2n$ which emphasizes its group structure:




      $D_2n$ consists of distinct elements $r_0,...,r_n-1,s_0,...,s_n-1$ so that for any $i in mathbbZ$ we have $r_i + n = r_i, s_i + n s_i$ and for any $i,j in mathbbZ$ we have $r_ir_j = r_i + j, r_is_j = s_i + j, s_ir_j = s_i - j, s_is_j = r_i - j$.




      It's easy to see that all $r_i's$ commute in $D_2n$, hence the only elements for which it is possible not to commute are $s_i$ and $s_j$ or $r_i$ and $s_j$.



      $s_is_j = s_js_i$ whenever $i - j equiv j - i bmod n$ and $r_is_j = s_jr_i$ whenever $i + j equiv i - j bmod n$, hence $D_2n$ is noncommutative if and only if either



      • there is $0 leq j < n$ so that $nnmid 2j$, or


      • there are $0 leq i,j < n$ so that $nnmid 2(i - j)$.


      Using this result, it's not hard to establish that $D_2$ and $D_4$ are abelian.



      I wonder how we can use this to prove that $D_2n$ is not abelian for $n geq 3$. I'm not interested in a possible geometric proof.





      This question already has an answer here:



      • Is it true that a dihedral group is nonabelian?

        5 answers







      group-theory elementary-number-theory dihedral-groups






      share|cite|improve this question













      share|cite|improve this question











      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question










      asked Mar 13 at 19:17









      Jxt921Jxt921

      1,026618




      1,026618




      marked as duplicate by Dietrich Burde group-theory
      Users with the  group-theory badge can single-handedly close group-theory questions as duplicates and reopen them as needed.

      StackExchange.ready(function()
      if (StackExchange.options.isMobile) return;

      $('.dupe-hammer-message-hover:not(.hover-bound)').each(function()
      var $hover = $(this).addClass('hover-bound'),
      $msg = $hover.siblings('.dupe-hammer-message');

      $hover.hover(
      function()
      $hover.showInfoMessage('',
      messageElement: $msg.clone().show(),
      transient: false,
      position: my: 'bottom left', at: 'top center', offsetTop: -7 ,
      dismissable: false,
      relativeToBody: true
      );
      ,
      function()
      StackExchange.helpers.removeMessages();

      );
      );
      );
      Mar 13 at 19:46


      This question has been asked before and already has an answer. If those answers do not fully address your question, please ask a new question.









      marked as duplicate by Dietrich Burde group-theory
      Users with the  group-theory badge can single-handedly close group-theory questions as duplicates and reopen them as needed.

      StackExchange.ready(function()
      if (StackExchange.options.isMobile) return;

      $('.dupe-hammer-message-hover:not(.hover-bound)').each(function()
      var $hover = $(this).addClass('hover-bound'),
      $msg = $hover.siblings('.dupe-hammer-message');

      $hover.hover(
      function()
      $hover.showInfoMessage('',
      messageElement: $msg.clone().show(),
      transient: false,
      position: my: 'bottom left', at: 'top center', offsetTop: -7 ,
      dismissable: false,
      relativeToBody: true
      );
      ,
      function()
      StackExchange.helpers.removeMessages();

      );
      );
      );
      Mar 13 at 19:46


      This question has been asked before and already has an answer. If those answers do not fully address your question, please ask a new question.






















          2 Answers
          2






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          1












          $begingroup$

          I bet you can prove that
          $$r_1s_1neq s_1r_1$$
          It follows easily from your definition.






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$




















            0












            $begingroup$

            By definition there is a rotation $r$ in $D_n$, $nge 3$ and a reflection $s$ such that
            $$
            srs^-1=r^-1neq r.
            $$

            So $D_n$ is non-abelian. We can also give a second proof by determining the center of $D_n$. A group is abelian iff it equals its center. However, we easily see that $Z(D_n)$ is much smaller than that:



            The center of the dihedral group






            share|cite|improve this answer









            $endgroup$



















              2 Answers
              2






              active

              oldest

              votes








              2 Answers
              2






              active

              oldest

              votes









              active

              oldest

              votes






              active

              oldest

              votes









              1












              $begingroup$

              I bet you can prove that
              $$r_1s_1neq s_1r_1$$
              It follows easily from your definition.






              share|cite|improve this answer









              $endgroup$

















                1












                $begingroup$

                I bet you can prove that
                $$r_1s_1neq s_1r_1$$
                It follows easily from your definition.






                share|cite|improve this answer









                $endgroup$















                  1












                  1








                  1





                  $begingroup$

                  I bet you can prove that
                  $$r_1s_1neq s_1r_1$$
                  It follows easily from your definition.






                  share|cite|improve this answer









                  $endgroup$



                  I bet you can prove that
                  $$r_1s_1neq s_1r_1$$
                  It follows easily from your definition.







                  share|cite|improve this answer












                  share|cite|improve this answer



                  share|cite|improve this answer










                  answered Mar 13 at 19:35









                  Matt SamuelMatt Samuel

                  38.8k63769




                  38.8k63769





















                      0












                      $begingroup$

                      By definition there is a rotation $r$ in $D_n$, $nge 3$ and a reflection $s$ such that
                      $$
                      srs^-1=r^-1neq r.
                      $$

                      So $D_n$ is non-abelian. We can also give a second proof by determining the center of $D_n$. A group is abelian iff it equals its center. However, we easily see that $Z(D_n)$ is much smaller than that:



                      The center of the dihedral group






                      share|cite|improve this answer









                      $endgroup$

















                        0












                        $begingroup$

                        By definition there is a rotation $r$ in $D_n$, $nge 3$ and a reflection $s$ such that
                        $$
                        srs^-1=r^-1neq r.
                        $$

                        So $D_n$ is non-abelian. We can also give a second proof by determining the center of $D_n$. A group is abelian iff it equals its center. However, we easily see that $Z(D_n)$ is much smaller than that:



                        The center of the dihedral group






                        share|cite|improve this answer









                        $endgroup$















                          0












                          0








                          0





                          $begingroup$

                          By definition there is a rotation $r$ in $D_n$, $nge 3$ and a reflection $s$ such that
                          $$
                          srs^-1=r^-1neq r.
                          $$

                          So $D_n$ is non-abelian. We can also give a second proof by determining the center of $D_n$. A group is abelian iff it equals its center. However, we easily see that $Z(D_n)$ is much smaller than that:



                          The center of the dihedral group






                          share|cite|improve this answer









                          $endgroup$



                          By definition there is a rotation $r$ in $D_n$, $nge 3$ and a reflection $s$ such that
                          $$
                          srs^-1=r^-1neq r.
                          $$

                          So $D_n$ is non-abelian. We can also give a second proof by determining the center of $D_n$. A group is abelian iff it equals its center. However, we easily see that $Z(D_n)$ is much smaller than that:



                          The center of the dihedral group







                          share|cite|improve this answer












                          share|cite|improve this answer



                          share|cite|improve this answer










                          answered Mar 13 at 19:44









                          Dietrich BurdeDietrich Burde

                          81k648106




                          81k648106













                              Popular posts from this blog

                              Moe incest case Sentencing See also References Navigation menu"'Australian Josef Fritzl' fathered four children by daughter""Small town recoils in horror at 'Australian Fritzl' incest case""Victorian rape allegations echo Fritzl case - Just In (Australian Broadcasting Corporation)""Incest father jailed for 22 years""'Australian Fritzl' sentenced to 22 years in prison for abusing daughter for three decades""RSJ v The Queen"

                              John Burke, 9th Earl of Clanricarde References Navigation menuA General and heraldic dictionary of the peerage and baronetage of the British EmpireLeigh Rayment's Peerage Pages

                              Football at the 1986 Brunei Merdeka Games Contents Teams Group stage Knockout stage References Navigation menu"Brunei Merdeka Games 1986".