Nonabelian dihedral groups and a question in number theory [duplicate]Is it true that a dihedral group is nonabelian?The center of the dihedral groupOn the centres of the dihedral groupsShowing that Ab(G) need not be completeProve that the dihedral group $D_4$ can not be written as a direct product of two groupsFind all $x$ in $D_4$ such that $ax(a^-1) = b$.Subgroups of generalized dihedral groupsHomomorphisms between Dihedral and Cyclic GroupsFind a permutation that satisfies this congruenceDefining dihedral groups $sigma in S_n: $ something $$Is it only the generator of the group that commutes with all the other elements?List of symmetric group elements from the usual presentation

Should I warn a new PhD Student?

How to test the sharpness of a knife?

Do people actually use the word "kaputt" in conversation?

Why is participating in the European Parliamentary elections used as a threat?

Is there a distance limit for minecart tracks?

What is the tangent at a sharp point on a curve?

Showing mass murder in a kid's book

Capacitor electron flow

What is the purpose of using a decision tree?

C++ lambda syntax

Can a Knock spell open the door to Mordenkainen's Magnificent Mansion?

Why do Radio Buttons not fill the entire outer circle?

Trouble reading roman numeral notation with flats

How do you justify more code being written by following clean code practices?

How do you say "Trust your struggle." in French?

Why would five hundred and five same as one?

Reasons for having MCU pin-states default to pull-up/down out of reset

Started in 1987 vs. Starting in 1987

Is divisi notation needed for brass or woodwind in an orchestra?

What can I do if I am asked to learn different programming languages very frequently?

Why is "la Gestapo" feminine?

Is there any common country to visit for persons holding UK and Schengen visas?

Are hand made posters acceptable in Academia?

Can you take a "free object interaction" while incapacitated?



Nonabelian dihedral groups and a question in number theory [duplicate]


Is it true that a dihedral group is nonabelian?The center of the dihedral groupOn the centres of the dihedral groupsShowing that Ab(G) need not be completeProve that the dihedral group $D_4$ can not be written as a direct product of two groupsFind all $x$ in $D_4$ such that $ax(a^-1) = b$.Subgroups of generalized dihedral groupsHomomorphisms between Dihedral and Cyclic GroupsFind a permutation that satisfies this congruenceDefining dihedral groups $sigma in S_n: $ something $$Is it only the generator of the group that commutes with all the other elements?List of symmetric group elements from the usual presentation













0












$begingroup$



This question already has an answer here:



  • Is it true that a dihedral group is nonabelian?

    5 answers



I'll use a concrete definition of a dihedral group $D_2n$ which emphasizes its group structure:




$D_2n$ consists of distinct elements $r_0,...,r_n-1,s_0,...,s_n-1$ so that for any $i in mathbbZ$ we have $r_i + n = r_i, s_i + n s_i$ and for any $i,j in mathbbZ$ we have $r_ir_j = r_i + j, r_is_j = s_i + j, s_ir_j = s_i - j, s_is_j = r_i - j$.




It's easy to see that all $r_i's$ commute in $D_2n$, hence the only elements for which it is possible not to commute are $s_i$ and $s_j$ or $r_i$ and $s_j$.



$s_is_j = s_js_i$ whenever $i - j equiv j - i bmod n$ and $r_is_j = s_jr_i$ whenever $i + j equiv i - j bmod n$, hence $D_2n$ is noncommutative if and only if either



  • there is $0 leq j < n$ so that $nnmid 2j$, or


  • there are $0 leq i,j < n$ so that $nnmid 2(i - j)$.


Using this result, it's not hard to establish that $D_2$ and $D_4$ are abelian.



I wonder how we can use this to prove that $D_2n$ is not abelian for $n geq 3$. I'm not interested in a possible geometric proof.










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$



marked as duplicate by Dietrich Burde group-theory
Users with the  group-theory badge can single-handedly close group-theory questions as duplicates and reopen them as needed.

StackExchange.ready(function()
if (StackExchange.options.isMobile) return;

$('.dupe-hammer-message-hover:not(.hover-bound)').each(function()
var $hover = $(this).addClass('hover-bound'),
$msg = $hover.siblings('.dupe-hammer-message');

$hover.hover(
function()
$hover.showInfoMessage('',
messageElement: $msg.clone().show(),
transient: false,
position: my: 'bottom left', at: 'top center', offsetTop: -7 ,
dismissable: false,
relativeToBody: true
);
,
function()
StackExchange.helpers.removeMessages();

);
);
);
Mar 13 at 19:46


This question has been asked before and already has an answer. If those answers do not fully address your question, please ask a new question.






















    0












    $begingroup$



    This question already has an answer here:



    • Is it true that a dihedral group is nonabelian?

      5 answers



    I'll use a concrete definition of a dihedral group $D_2n$ which emphasizes its group structure:




    $D_2n$ consists of distinct elements $r_0,...,r_n-1,s_0,...,s_n-1$ so that for any $i in mathbbZ$ we have $r_i + n = r_i, s_i + n s_i$ and for any $i,j in mathbbZ$ we have $r_ir_j = r_i + j, r_is_j = s_i + j, s_ir_j = s_i - j, s_is_j = r_i - j$.




    It's easy to see that all $r_i's$ commute in $D_2n$, hence the only elements for which it is possible not to commute are $s_i$ and $s_j$ or $r_i$ and $s_j$.



    $s_is_j = s_js_i$ whenever $i - j equiv j - i bmod n$ and $r_is_j = s_jr_i$ whenever $i + j equiv i - j bmod n$, hence $D_2n$ is noncommutative if and only if either



    • there is $0 leq j < n$ so that $nnmid 2j$, or


    • there are $0 leq i,j < n$ so that $nnmid 2(i - j)$.


    Using this result, it's not hard to establish that $D_2$ and $D_4$ are abelian.



    I wonder how we can use this to prove that $D_2n$ is not abelian for $n geq 3$. I'm not interested in a possible geometric proof.










    share|cite|improve this question









    $endgroup$



    marked as duplicate by Dietrich Burde group-theory
    Users with the  group-theory badge can single-handedly close group-theory questions as duplicates and reopen them as needed.

    StackExchange.ready(function()
    if (StackExchange.options.isMobile) return;

    $('.dupe-hammer-message-hover:not(.hover-bound)').each(function()
    var $hover = $(this).addClass('hover-bound'),
    $msg = $hover.siblings('.dupe-hammer-message');

    $hover.hover(
    function()
    $hover.showInfoMessage('',
    messageElement: $msg.clone().show(),
    transient: false,
    position: my: 'bottom left', at: 'top center', offsetTop: -7 ,
    dismissable: false,
    relativeToBody: true
    );
    ,
    function()
    StackExchange.helpers.removeMessages();

    );
    );
    );
    Mar 13 at 19:46


    This question has been asked before and already has an answer. If those answers do not fully address your question, please ask a new question.




















      0












      0








      0





      $begingroup$



      This question already has an answer here:



      • Is it true that a dihedral group is nonabelian?

        5 answers



      I'll use a concrete definition of a dihedral group $D_2n$ which emphasizes its group structure:




      $D_2n$ consists of distinct elements $r_0,...,r_n-1,s_0,...,s_n-1$ so that for any $i in mathbbZ$ we have $r_i + n = r_i, s_i + n s_i$ and for any $i,j in mathbbZ$ we have $r_ir_j = r_i + j, r_is_j = s_i + j, s_ir_j = s_i - j, s_is_j = r_i - j$.




      It's easy to see that all $r_i's$ commute in $D_2n$, hence the only elements for which it is possible not to commute are $s_i$ and $s_j$ or $r_i$ and $s_j$.



      $s_is_j = s_js_i$ whenever $i - j equiv j - i bmod n$ and $r_is_j = s_jr_i$ whenever $i + j equiv i - j bmod n$, hence $D_2n$ is noncommutative if and only if either



      • there is $0 leq j < n$ so that $nnmid 2j$, or


      • there are $0 leq i,j < n$ so that $nnmid 2(i - j)$.


      Using this result, it's not hard to establish that $D_2$ and $D_4$ are abelian.



      I wonder how we can use this to prove that $D_2n$ is not abelian for $n geq 3$. I'm not interested in a possible geometric proof.










      share|cite|improve this question









      $endgroup$





      This question already has an answer here:



      • Is it true that a dihedral group is nonabelian?

        5 answers



      I'll use a concrete definition of a dihedral group $D_2n$ which emphasizes its group structure:




      $D_2n$ consists of distinct elements $r_0,...,r_n-1,s_0,...,s_n-1$ so that for any $i in mathbbZ$ we have $r_i + n = r_i, s_i + n s_i$ and for any $i,j in mathbbZ$ we have $r_ir_j = r_i + j, r_is_j = s_i + j, s_ir_j = s_i - j, s_is_j = r_i - j$.




      It's easy to see that all $r_i's$ commute in $D_2n$, hence the only elements for which it is possible not to commute are $s_i$ and $s_j$ or $r_i$ and $s_j$.



      $s_is_j = s_js_i$ whenever $i - j equiv j - i bmod n$ and $r_is_j = s_jr_i$ whenever $i + j equiv i - j bmod n$, hence $D_2n$ is noncommutative if and only if either



      • there is $0 leq j < n$ so that $nnmid 2j$, or


      • there are $0 leq i,j < n$ so that $nnmid 2(i - j)$.


      Using this result, it's not hard to establish that $D_2$ and $D_4$ are abelian.



      I wonder how we can use this to prove that $D_2n$ is not abelian for $n geq 3$. I'm not interested in a possible geometric proof.





      This question already has an answer here:



      • Is it true that a dihedral group is nonabelian?

        5 answers







      group-theory elementary-number-theory dihedral-groups






      share|cite|improve this question













      share|cite|improve this question











      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question










      asked Mar 13 at 19:17









      Jxt921Jxt921

      1,026618




      1,026618




      marked as duplicate by Dietrich Burde group-theory
      Users with the  group-theory badge can single-handedly close group-theory questions as duplicates and reopen them as needed.

      StackExchange.ready(function()
      if (StackExchange.options.isMobile) return;

      $('.dupe-hammer-message-hover:not(.hover-bound)').each(function()
      var $hover = $(this).addClass('hover-bound'),
      $msg = $hover.siblings('.dupe-hammer-message');

      $hover.hover(
      function()
      $hover.showInfoMessage('',
      messageElement: $msg.clone().show(),
      transient: false,
      position: my: 'bottom left', at: 'top center', offsetTop: -7 ,
      dismissable: false,
      relativeToBody: true
      );
      ,
      function()
      StackExchange.helpers.removeMessages();

      );
      );
      );
      Mar 13 at 19:46


      This question has been asked before and already has an answer. If those answers do not fully address your question, please ask a new question.









      marked as duplicate by Dietrich Burde group-theory
      Users with the  group-theory badge can single-handedly close group-theory questions as duplicates and reopen them as needed.

      StackExchange.ready(function()
      if (StackExchange.options.isMobile) return;

      $('.dupe-hammer-message-hover:not(.hover-bound)').each(function()
      var $hover = $(this).addClass('hover-bound'),
      $msg = $hover.siblings('.dupe-hammer-message');

      $hover.hover(
      function()
      $hover.showInfoMessage('',
      messageElement: $msg.clone().show(),
      transient: false,
      position: my: 'bottom left', at: 'top center', offsetTop: -7 ,
      dismissable: false,
      relativeToBody: true
      );
      ,
      function()
      StackExchange.helpers.removeMessages();

      );
      );
      );
      Mar 13 at 19:46


      This question has been asked before and already has an answer. If those answers do not fully address your question, please ask a new question.






















          2 Answers
          2






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          1












          $begingroup$

          I bet you can prove that
          $$r_1s_1neq s_1r_1$$
          It follows easily from your definition.






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$




















            0












            $begingroup$

            By definition there is a rotation $r$ in $D_n$, $nge 3$ and a reflection $s$ such that
            $$
            srs^-1=r^-1neq r.
            $$

            So $D_n$ is non-abelian. We can also give a second proof by determining the center of $D_n$. A group is abelian iff it equals its center. However, we easily see that $Z(D_n)$ is much smaller than that:



            The center of the dihedral group






            share|cite|improve this answer









            $endgroup$



















              2 Answers
              2






              active

              oldest

              votes








              2 Answers
              2






              active

              oldest

              votes









              active

              oldest

              votes






              active

              oldest

              votes









              1












              $begingroup$

              I bet you can prove that
              $$r_1s_1neq s_1r_1$$
              It follows easily from your definition.






              share|cite|improve this answer









              $endgroup$

















                1












                $begingroup$

                I bet you can prove that
                $$r_1s_1neq s_1r_1$$
                It follows easily from your definition.






                share|cite|improve this answer









                $endgroup$















                  1












                  1








                  1





                  $begingroup$

                  I bet you can prove that
                  $$r_1s_1neq s_1r_1$$
                  It follows easily from your definition.






                  share|cite|improve this answer









                  $endgroup$



                  I bet you can prove that
                  $$r_1s_1neq s_1r_1$$
                  It follows easily from your definition.







                  share|cite|improve this answer












                  share|cite|improve this answer



                  share|cite|improve this answer










                  answered Mar 13 at 19:35









                  Matt SamuelMatt Samuel

                  38.8k63769




                  38.8k63769





















                      0












                      $begingroup$

                      By definition there is a rotation $r$ in $D_n$, $nge 3$ and a reflection $s$ such that
                      $$
                      srs^-1=r^-1neq r.
                      $$

                      So $D_n$ is non-abelian. We can also give a second proof by determining the center of $D_n$. A group is abelian iff it equals its center. However, we easily see that $Z(D_n)$ is much smaller than that:



                      The center of the dihedral group






                      share|cite|improve this answer









                      $endgroup$

















                        0












                        $begingroup$

                        By definition there is a rotation $r$ in $D_n$, $nge 3$ and a reflection $s$ such that
                        $$
                        srs^-1=r^-1neq r.
                        $$

                        So $D_n$ is non-abelian. We can also give a second proof by determining the center of $D_n$. A group is abelian iff it equals its center. However, we easily see that $Z(D_n)$ is much smaller than that:



                        The center of the dihedral group






                        share|cite|improve this answer









                        $endgroup$















                          0












                          0








                          0





                          $begingroup$

                          By definition there is a rotation $r$ in $D_n$, $nge 3$ and a reflection $s$ such that
                          $$
                          srs^-1=r^-1neq r.
                          $$

                          So $D_n$ is non-abelian. We can also give a second proof by determining the center of $D_n$. A group is abelian iff it equals its center. However, we easily see that $Z(D_n)$ is much smaller than that:



                          The center of the dihedral group






                          share|cite|improve this answer









                          $endgroup$



                          By definition there is a rotation $r$ in $D_n$, $nge 3$ and a reflection $s$ such that
                          $$
                          srs^-1=r^-1neq r.
                          $$

                          So $D_n$ is non-abelian. We can also give a second proof by determining the center of $D_n$. A group is abelian iff it equals its center. However, we easily see that $Z(D_n)$ is much smaller than that:



                          The center of the dihedral group







                          share|cite|improve this answer












                          share|cite|improve this answer



                          share|cite|improve this answer










                          answered Mar 13 at 19:44









                          Dietrich BurdeDietrich Burde

                          81k648106




                          81k648106













                              Popular posts from this blog

                              Solar Wings Breeze Design and development Specifications (Breeze) References Navigation menu1368-485X"Hang glider: Breeze (Solar Wings)"e

                              Kathakali Contents Etymology and nomenclature History Repertoire Songs and musical instruments Traditional plays Styles: Sampradayam Training centers and awards Relationship to other dance forms See also Notes References External links Navigation menueThe Illustrated Encyclopedia of Hinduism: A-MSouth Asian Folklore: An EncyclopediaRoutledge International Encyclopedia of Women: Global Women's Issues and KnowledgeKathakali Dance-drama: Where Gods and Demons Come to PlayKathakali Dance-drama: Where Gods and Demons Come to PlayKathakali Dance-drama: Where Gods and Demons Come to Play10.1353/atj.2005.0004The Illustrated Encyclopedia of Hinduism: A-MEncyclopedia of HinduismKathakali Dance-drama: Where Gods and Demons Come to PlaySonic Liturgy: Ritual and Music in Hindu Tradition"The Mirror of Gesture"Kathakali Dance-drama: Where Gods and Demons Come to Play"Kathakali"Indian Theatre: Traditions of PerformanceIndian Theatre: Traditions of PerformanceIndian Theatre: Traditions of PerformanceIndian Theatre: Traditions of PerformanceMedieval Indian Literature: An AnthologyThe Oxford Companion to Indian TheatreSouth Asian Folklore: An Encyclopedia : Afghanistan, Bangladesh, India, Nepal, Pakistan, Sri LankaThe Rise of Performance Studies: Rethinking Richard Schechner's Broad SpectrumIndian Theatre: Traditions of PerformanceModern Asian Theatre and Performance 1900-2000Critical Theory and PerformanceBetween Theater and AnthropologyKathakali603847011Indian Theatre: Traditions of PerformanceIndian Theatre: Traditions of PerformanceIndian Theatre: Traditions of PerformanceBetween Theater and AnthropologyBetween Theater and AnthropologyNambeesan Smaraka AwardsArchivedThe Cambridge Guide to TheatreRoutledge International Encyclopedia of Women: Global Women's Issues and KnowledgeThe Garland Encyclopedia of World Music: South Asia : the Indian subcontinentThe Ethos of Noh: Actors and Their Art10.2307/1145740By Means of Performance: Intercultural Studies of Theatre and Ritual10.1017/s204912550000100xReconceiving the Renaissance: A Critical ReaderPerformance TheoryListening to Theatre: The Aural Dimension of Beijing Opera10.2307/1146013Kathakali: The Art of the Non-WorldlyOn KathakaliKathakali, the dance theatreThe Kathakali Complex: Performance & StructureKathakali Dance-Drama: Where Gods and Demons Come to Play10.1093/obo/9780195399318-0071Drama and Ritual of Early Hinduism"In the Shadow of Hollywood Orientalism: Authentic East Indian Dancing"10.1080/08949460490274013Sanskrit Play Production in Ancient IndiaIndian Music: History and StructureBharata, the Nāṭyaśāstra233639306Table of Contents2238067286469807Dance In Indian Painting10.2307/32047833204783Kathakali Dance-Theatre: A Visual Narrative of Sacred Indian MimeIndian Classical Dance: The Renaissance and BeyondKathakali: an indigenous art-form of Keralaeee

                              Method to test if a number is a perfect power? Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara Planned maintenance scheduled April 23, 2019 at 00:00UTC (8:00pm US/Eastern)Detecting perfect squares faster than by extracting square rooteffective way to get the integer sequence A181392 from oeisA rarely mentioned fact about perfect powersHow many numbers such $n$ are there that $n<100,lfloorsqrtn rfloor mid n$Check perfect squareness by modulo division against multiple basesFor what pair of integers $(a,b)$ is $3^a + 7^b$ a perfect square.Do there exist any positive integers $n$ such that $lfloore^nrfloor$ is a perfect power? What is the probability that one exists?finding perfect power factors of an integerProve that the sequence contains a perfect square for any natural number $m $ in the domain of $f$ .Counting Perfect Powers