Does the Bracer of Flying Daggers benefit from the Dueling fighting style?Does Dueling Fighting Style apply to thrown weapons?What might be the downside of taking the Dueling fighting style over Great Weapon Fighting?What are the limitations on the “Dueling” fighting style for Fighters?Does Dueling Fighting Style apply to thrown weapons?Does the Dueling damage bonus not apply to Two-Handed Weapons?Combining Dueling and Two Weapon Fighting stylesCould a Duelist Fighter wield Alchemist's Fire in their offhand and retain the Benefits of the Dueling fighting style?Is the Polearm Master Feat compatible with the Two-Weapon Fighting style?Would being hidden grant advantage on both Bracers of Flying Daggers attacks?Does the bonus damage from the Dueling fighting style apply when attacking with a shield as an improvised weapon, using the Tavern Brawler feat?How does the Dueling Fighting Style interact with Shocking Grasp and Booming Blade?

What is the purpose of using a decision tree?

How can I, as DM, avoid the Conga Line of Death occurring when implementing some form of flanking rule?

What is it called when someone votes for an option that's not their first choice?

How do I lift the insulation blower into the attic?

Does capillary rise violate hydrostatic paradox?

A seasonal riddle

What do the positive and negative (+/-) transmit and receive pins mean on Ethernet cables?

Showing mass murder in a kid's book

What is the period/term used describe Giuseppe Arcimboldo's style of painting?

Is there any common country to visit for persons holding UK and Schengen visas?

Would this string work as string?

Started in 1987 vs. Starting in 1987

categorizing a variable turns it from insignificant to significant

Why does a 97 / 92 key piano exist by Bosendorfer?

Why didn’t Eve recognize the little cockroach as a living organism?

Is this saw blade faulty?

C++ lambda syntax

Are hand made posters acceptable in Academia?

Why do Radio Buttons not fill the entire outer circle?

Strange behavior in TikZ draw command

Is there a distance limit for minecart tracks?

Do I have to take mana from my deck or hand when tapping this card?

How to split IPA spelling into syllables

Writing in a Christian voice



Does the Bracer of Flying Daggers benefit from the Dueling fighting style?


Does Dueling Fighting Style apply to thrown weapons?What might be the downside of taking the Dueling fighting style over Great Weapon Fighting?What are the limitations on the “Dueling” fighting style for Fighters?Does Dueling Fighting Style apply to thrown weapons?Does the Dueling damage bonus not apply to Two-Handed Weapons?Combining Dueling and Two Weapon Fighting stylesCould a Duelist Fighter wield Alchemist's Fire in their offhand and retain the Benefits of the Dueling fighting style?Is the Polearm Master Feat compatible with the Two-Weapon Fighting style?Would being hidden grant advantage on both Bracers of Flying Daggers attacks?Does the bonus damage from the Dueling fighting style apply when attacking with a shield as an improvised weapon, using the Tavern Brawler feat?How does the Dueling Fighting Style interact with Shocking Grasp and Booming Blade?













11












$begingroup$


The Dueling Fighting style description says:




When you are wielding a melee weapon in one hand and no other weapons, you gain a +2 bonus to damage rolls with that weapon.




The Bracer of Flying Daggers magic item (from Waterdeep: Dragon Heist, p. 190):




This armband appears to have thin daggers strapped to it. As an action, you can pull up to two magic daggers from the bracer and immediately hurl them, making a ranged attack with each dagger. A dagger vanishes if you don't hurl it right away, and the daggers disappear right after they hit or miss. The bracer never runs out of daggers.




If you have the Dueling fighting style, your hands are empty, and you activate the Bracer, do you get the damage bonus to both throws?










share|improve this question











$endgroup$







  • 6




    $begingroup$
    Related: Does Dueling Fighting Style apply to thrown weapons?
    $endgroup$
    – Sdjz
    Mar 13 at 17:21















11












$begingroup$


The Dueling Fighting style description says:




When you are wielding a melee weapon in one hand and no other weapons, you gain a +2 bonus to damage rolls with that weapon.




The Bracer of Flying Daggers magic item (from Waterdeep: Dragon Heist, p. 190):




This armband appears to have thin daggers strapped to it. As an action, you can pull up to two magic daggers from the bracer and immediately hurl them, making a ranged attack with each dagger. A dagger vanishes if you don't hurl it right away, and the daggers disappear right after they hit or miss. The bracer never runs out of daggers.




If you have the Dueling fighting style, your hands are empty, and you activate the Bracer, do you get the damage bonus to both throws?










share|improve this question











$endgroup$







  • 6




    $begingroup$
    Related: Does Dueling Fighting Style apply to thrown weapons?
    $endgroup$
    – Sdjz
    Mar 13 at 17:21













11












11








11


1



$begingroup$


The Dueling Fighting style description says:




When you are wielding a melee weapon in one hand and no other weapons, you gain a +2 bonus to damage rolls with that weapon.




The Bracer of Flying Daggers magic item (from Waterdeep: Dragon Heist, p. 190):




This armband appears to have thin daggers strapped to it. As an action, you can pull up to two magic daggers from the bracer and immediately hurl them, making a ranged attack with each dagger. A dagger vanishes if you don't hurl it right away, and the daggers disappear right after they hit or miss. The bracer never runs out of daggers.




If you have the Dueling fighting style, your hands are empty, and you activate the Bracer, do you get the damage bonus to both throws?










share|improve this question











$endgroup$




The Dueling Fighting style description says:




When you are wielding a melee weapon in one hand and no other weapons, you gain a +2 bonus to damage rolls with that weapon.




The Bracer of Flying Daggers magic item (from Waterdeep: Dragon Heist, p. 190):




This armband appears to have thin daggers strapped to it. As an action, you can pull up to two magic daggers from the bracer and immediately hurl them, making a ranged attack with each dagger. A dagger vanishes if you don't hurl it right away, and the daggers disappear right after they hit or miss. The bracer never runs out of daggers.




If you have the Dueling fighting style, your hands are empty, and you activate the Bracer, do you get the damage bonus to both throws?







dnd-5e magic-items class-feature damage fighting-style






share|improve this question















share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited Mar 14 at 1:05









V2Blast

25k383155




25k383155










asked Mar 13 at 17:19









Ben BardenBen Barden

10.9k12763




10.9k12763







  • 6




    $begingroup$
    Related: Does Dueling Fighting Style apply to thrown weapons?
    $endgroup$
    – Sdjz
    Mar 13 at 17:21












  • 6




    $begingroup$
    Related: Does Dueling Fighting Style apply to thrown weapons?
    $endgroup$
    – Sdjz
    Mar 13 at 17:21







6




6




$begingroup$
Related: Does Dueling Fighting Style apply to thrown weapons?
$endgroup$
– Sdjz
Mar 13 at 17:21




$begingroup$
Related: Does Dueling Fighting Style apply to thrown weapons?
$endgroup$
– Sdjz
Mar 13 at 17:21










3 Answers
3






active

oldest

votes


















10












$begingroup$

The question is whether thrown melee weapons qualify for Dueling or not



The description specifies that you pull daggers out of the armband (despite the logistically problems of sticking a full-sized dagger in an armband. I would have gone with knives had I designed it), which are on the melee weapon table and therefore are melee weapons (magical ones, no less). You obviously don't have another weapon in your other hand, so all we need to know is whether throwing a melee weapons counts as "wielding" the weapon.



There is no game-definition for "wielding", so we rely on common English to understand it. Google gives this definition for "wield":




hold and use (a weapon or tool).




Under that definition, and in my own opinion, I'd say that throwing a melee weapon counts as wielding it for the purposes of Dueling.



Crawford agrees that Dueling applies to thrown weapons, for what that is worth (keeping in mind his Sage Advice tweets are unofficial).



The related question Does Dueling Fighting Style apply to thrown weapons? has arguments for and against this ruling.




This is a poorly worded item



It is unclear whether you are drawing both daggers at once in both hands, or one at a time, or what. For some interpretations it would matter whether you are drawing both at once, or if you are throwing both at once, but this is mine: I assume you are drawing one, throwing one, then repeating. If you draw one, immediately hurl it, then draw another and immediately hurl it, you've still drawn 2 daggers and immediately hurled them.






share|improve this answer











$endgroup$








  • 2




    $begingroup$
    But Dueling says " a melee weapon in one hand and no other weapons" wouldn't holding two daggers in one hand count (or one in each hand)? Or are you interpreting the arm band as letting you draw them one at a time?
    $endgroup$
    – Rubiksmoose
    Mar 13 at 18:09











  • $begingroup$
    @Rubiksmoose I assumed you would draw-> throw 1 dagger at a time, up to twice. I could see an argument that Dueling would only apply to 1 dagger, or the 2nd if 2 are drawn, but that is too low level for me to really care about. Either apply it to the whole thing or not.
    $endgroup$
    – GreySage
    Mar 13 at 18:12










  • $begingroup$
    Well, the text just says as an action you can draw up to two. So in your action you are drawing 1 or 2 daggers and then throwing them immediately.
    $endgroup$
    – NautArch
    Mar 13 at 18:17






  • 5




    $begingroup$
    For what it's worth, DNDBeyond calls it the Bracer of Flying Daggers, no plural on "bracer". I believe calling the item "bracers" is a typo on the OP's part.
    $endgroup$
    – Xirema
    Mar 13 at 18:23


















4












$begingroup$

Only to one throw, not to both



Short of contradicting evidence, the Daggers summoned by the Bracers of Flying Daggers are in every respect identical to regular, PHB Daggers, except for the added properties that they vanish if not thrown or after they are thrown, and you are allowed to make two attacks with them regardless of your [in-]ability to use the Extra Attacks feature.



Because of this, a character would obviously benefit from their Dueling feature: Daggers are a one-handed weapon, can be thrown with a single hand, and thrown weapons benefit from the Dueling feature*, so you should get the Dueling bonus.



There is a catch though:




Dueling. When you are wielding a melee weapon in one hand and no other weapons, you gain a +2 bonus to damage rolls with that weapon.




If you draw two daggers from the bracer, you'd be holding two weapons, which violates the requirements of the feature. So at the very least, the first dagger thrown would not benefit.



The feature seems to imply that both are thrown at the same time, meaning neither dagger would benefit, but if your DM decides there's a "happens-before" relationship between the two attack rolls (i.e. one definitely happens before the other), then the second dagger would probably benefit.



This becomes moot, however, if you draw only a single dagger and throw it, since the requirements of Dueling would then be satisfied—and since the bracer says you may draw "up to two" daggers, you're fully allowed to draw only a single dagger.



* the top answer in that post contradicts RAI, and I recommend looking at the second answer instead.






share|improve this answer









$endgroup$








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @NautArch As I understand it, you're allowed to draw "up to two" daggers from the bracer, meaning you're allowed to draw (and then throw) only one if you so choose. As I said, if you draw two, then at least one of the daggers (and probably both) would not benefit from Dueling, but if you draw only one, then it's logical that you would benefit.
    $endgroup$
    – Xirema
    Mar 13 at 18:24











  • $begingroup$
    Thanks for the clarification. This looks solid +1.
    $endgroup$
    – NautArch
    Mar 13 at 18:27


















4












$begingroup$

Dueling will benefit in this situation depending on the interpretation you use



The Dueling fighting style states:




When you are wielding a melee weapon in one hand and no other weapons, you gain a +2 bonus to damage rolls with that weapon.




Daggers appear on the melee weapon table and the dueling fighting style requires a melee weapon. It does not say that it requires a melee weapon attack. This sounds like we're on the right track but, in throwing the melee weapon to make a ranged attack, it is no longer in your hand.



One argument is that the dagger is in hand at the moment the attack is initiated. However, the attack does not become a ranged attack until the instant the weapon leaves the hand. Therefore, the dagger not being in the hand is integral to it being a ranged attack (not a melee attack) and, as such, Dueling would not benefit the knives if they are thrown.




That all said, Jeremy Crawford has stated in a (now unofficial) Tweet that you can interpret the Dueling to allow the bonus to apply to ranged attacks. This is outside of the PHB but it's from the lead rules designer, so one could make a case either way and have strong support for the argument. As such, it probably depends on which argument the DM finds more persuasive.






share|improve this answer











$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    That disagrees with the logic of the accepted answer to the linked question.
    $endgroup$
    – Ben Barden
    Mar 13 at 18:08






  • 5




    $begingroup$
    @BenBarden accepted only means it was most useful to OP. It doesn't automatically mean correct. FWIW the votes seem pretty close between the first and second answer. Hardly decisive I'd say. Also, neither directly means that the logic in this answer is incorrect.
    $endgroup$
    – Rubiksmoose
    Mar 13 at 18:12











  • $begingroup$
    @ben I think Miniman and I have the same interpretation but he concedes that Jeremy Crawford, a higher authority, allows the interpretation that it will work. I will add the same caveat to this answer.
    $endgroup$
    – Rykara
    Mar 13 at 18:13











  • $begingroup$
    @Rykara though as that ruling came from a tweet, no longer officially a higher power regardless. RAI at most.
    $endgroup$
    – Rubiksmoose
    Mar 13 at 18:14







  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @rubik Can't edit my comment anymore but I meant "higher power than me," not the PHB, sorry. Thanks for editing to help clarify.
    $endgroup$
    – Rykara
    Mar 13 at 18:27










Your Answer





StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["\$", "\$"]]);
);
);
, "mathjax-editing");

StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "122"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);

else
createEditor();

);

function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);



);













draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2frpg.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f143072%2fdoes-the-bracer-of-flying-daggers-benefit-from-the-dueling-fighting-style%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























3 Answers
3






active

oldest

votes








3 Answers
3






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes









10












$begingroup$

The question is whether thrown melee weapons qualify for Dueling or not



The description specifies that you pull daggers out of the armband (despite the logistically problems of sticking a full-sized dagger in an armband. I would have gone with knives had I designed it), which are on the melee weapon table and therefore are melee weapons (magical ones, no less). You obviously don't have another weapon in your other hand, so all we need to know is whether throwing a melee weapons counts as "wielding" the weapon.



There is no game-definition for "wielding", so we rely on common English to understand it. Google gives this definition for "wield":




hold and use (a weapon or tool).




Under that definition, and in my own opinion, I'd say that throwing a melee weapon counts as wielding it for the purposes of Dueling.



Crawford agrees that Dueling applies to thrown weapons, for what that is worth (keeping in mind his Sage Advice tweets are unofficial).



The related question Does Dueling Fighting Style apply to thrown weapons? has arguments for and against this ruling.




This is a poorly worded item



It is unclear whether you are drawing both daggers at once in both hands, or one at a time, or what. For some interpretations it would matter whether you are drawing both at once, or if you are throwing both at once, but this is mine: I assume you are drawing one, throwing one, then repeating. If you draw one, immediately hurl it, then draw another and immediately hurl it, you've still drawn 2 daggers and immediately hurled them.






share|improve this answer











$endgroup$








  • 2




    $begingroup$
    But Dueling says " a melee weapon in one hand and no other weapons" wouldn't holding two daggers in one hand count (or one in each hand)? Or are you interpreting the arm band as letting you draw them one at a time?
    $endgroup$
    – Rubiksmoose
    Mar 13 at 18:09











  • $begingroup$
    @Rubiksmoose I assumed you would draw-> throw 1 dagger at a time, up to twice. I could see an argument that Dueling would only apply to 1 dagger, or the 2nd if 2 are drawn, but that is too low level for me to really care about. Either apply it to the whole thing or not.
    $endgroup$
    – GreySage
    Mar 13 at 18:12










  • $begingroup$
    Well, the text just says as an action you can draw up to two. So in your action you are drawing 1 or 2 daggers and then throwing them immediately.
    $endgroup$
    – NautArch
    Mar 13 at 18:17






  • 5




    $begingroup$
    For what it's worth, DNDBeyond calls it the Bracer of Flying Daggers, no plural on "bracer". I believe calling the item "bracers" is a typo on the OP's part.
    $endgroup$
    – Xirema
    Mar 13 at 18:23















10












$begingroup$

The question is whether thrown melee weapons qualify for Dueling or not



The description specifies that you pull daggers out of the armband (despite the logistically problems of sticking a full-sized dagger in an armband. I would have gone with knives had I designed it), which are on the melee weapon table and therefore are melee weapons (magical ones, no less). You obviously don't have another weapon in your other hand, so all we need to know is whether throwing a melee weapons counts as "wielding" the weapon.



There is no game-definition for "wielding", so we rely on common English to understand it. Google gives this definition for "wield":




hold and use (a weapon or tool).




Under that definition, and in my own opinion, I'd say that throwing a melee weapon counts as wielding it for the purposes of Dueling.



Crawford agrees that Dueling applies to thrown weapons, for what that is worth (keeping in mind his Sage Advice tweets are unofficial).



The related question Does Dueling Fighting Style apply to thrown weapons? has arguments for and against this ruling.




This is a poorly worded item



It is unclear whether you are drawing both daggers at once in both hands, or one at a time, or what. For some interpretations it would matter whether you are drawing both at once, or if you are throwing both at once, but this is mine: I assume you are drawing one, throwing one, then repeating. If you draw one, immediately hurl it, then draw another and immediately hurl it, you've still drawn 2 daggers and immediately hurled them.






share|improve this answer











$endgroup$








  • 2




    $begingroup$
    But Dueling says " a melee weapon in one hand and no other weapons" wouldn't holding two daggers in one hand count (or one in each hand)? Or are you interpreting the arm band as letting you draw them one at a time?
    $endgroup$
    – Rubiksmoose
    Mar 13 at 18:09











  • $begingroup$
    @Rubiksmoose I assumed you would draw-> throw 1 dagger at a time, up to twice. I could see an argument that Dueling would only apply to 1 dagger, or the 2nd if 2 are drawn, but that is too low level for me to really care about. Either apply it to the whole thing or not.
    $endgroup$
    – GreySage
    Mar 13 at 18:12










  • $begingroup$
    Well, the text just says as an action you can draw up to two. So in your action you are drawing 1 or 2 daggers and then throwing them immediately.
    $endgroup$
    – NautArch
    Mar 13 at 18:17






  • 5




    $begingroup$
    For what it's worth, DNDBeyond calls it the Bracer of Flying Daggers, no plural on "bracer". I believe calling the item "bracers" is a typo on the OP's part.
    $endgroup$
    – Xirema
    Mar 13 at 18:23













10












10








10





$begingroup$

The question is whether thrown melee weapons qualify for Dueling or not



The description specifies that you pull daggers out of the armband (despite the logistically problems of sticking a full-sized dagger in an armband. I would have gone with knives had I designed it), which are on the melee weapon table and therefore are melee weapons (magical ones, no less). You obviously don't have another weapon in your other hand, so all we need to know is whether throwing a melee weapons counts as "wielding" the weapon.



There is no game-definition for "wielding", so we rely on common English to understand it. Google gives this definition for "wield":




hold and use (a weapon or tool).




Under that definition, and in my own opinion, I'd say that throwing a melee weapon counts as wielding it for the purposes of Dueling.



Crawford agrees that Dueling applies to thrown weapons, for what that is worth (keeping in mind his Sage Advice tweets are unofficial).



The related question Does Dueling Fighting Style apply to thrown weapons? has arguments for and against this ruling.




This is a poorly worded item



It is unclear whether you are drawing both daggers at once in both hands, or one at a time, or what. For some interpretations it would matter whether you are drawing both at once, or if you are throwing both at once, but this is mine: I assume you are drawing one, throwing one, then repeating. If you draw one, immediately hurl it, then draw another and immediately hurl it, you've still drawn 2 daggers and immediately hurled them.






share|improve this answer











$endgroup$



The question is whether thrown melee weapons qualify for Dueling or not



The description specifies that you pull daggers out of the armband (despite the logistically problems of sticking a full-sized dagger in an armband. I would have gone with knives had I designed it), which are on the melee weapon table and therefore are melee weapons (magical ones, no less). You obviously don't have another weapon in your other hand, so all we need to know is whether throwing a melee weapons counts as "wielding" the weapon.



There is no game-definition for "wielding", so we rely on common English to understand it. Google gives this definition for "wield":




hold and use (a weapon or tool).




Under that definition, and in my own opinion, I'd say that throwing a melee weapon counts as wielding it for the purposes of Dueling.



Crawford agrees that Dueling applies to thrown weapons, for what that is worth (keeping in mind his Sage Advice tweets are unofficial).



The related question Does Dueling Fighting Style apply to thrown weapons? has arguments for and against this ruling.




This is a poorly worded item



It is unclear whether you are drawing both daggers at once in both hands, or one at a time, or what. For some interpretations it would matter whether you are drawing both at once, or if you are throwing both at once, but this is mine: I assume you are drawing one, throwing one, then repeating. If you draw one, immediately hurl it, then draw another and immediately hurl it, you've still drawn 2 daggers and immediately hurled them.







share|improve this answer














share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer








edited Mar 13 at 18:35

























answered Mar 13 at 18:04









GreySageGreySage

15.8k45397




15.8k45397







  • 2




    $begingroup$
    But Dueling says " a melee weapon in one hand and no other weapons" wouldn't holding two daggers in one hand count (or one in each hand)? Or are you interpreting the arm band as letting you draw them one at a time?
    $endgroup$
    – Rubiksmoose
    Mar 13 at 18:09











  • $begingroup$
    @Rubiksmoose I assumed you would draw-> throw 1 dagger at a time, up to twice. I could see an argument that Dueling would only apply to 1 dagger, or the 2nd if 2 are drawn, but that is too low level for me to really care about. Either apply it to the whole thing or not.
    $endgroup$
    – GreySage
    Mar 13 at 18:12










  • $begingroup$
    Well, the text just says as an action you can draw up to two. So in your action you are drawing 1 or 2 daggers and then throwing them immediately.
    $endgroup$
    – NautArch
    Mar 13 at 18:17






  • 5




    $begingroup$
    For what it's worth, DNDBeyond calls it the Bracer of Flying Daggers, no plural on "bracer". I believe calling the item "bracers" is a typo on the OP's part.
    $endgroup$
    – Xirema
    Mar 13 at 18:23












  • 2




    $begingroup$
    But Dueling says " a melee weapon in one hand and no other weapons" wouldn't holding two daggers in one hand count (or one in each hand)? Or are you interpreting the arm band as letting you draw them one at a time?
    $endgroup$
    – Rubiksmoose
    Mar 13 at 18:09











  • $begingroup$
    @Rubiksmoose I assumed you would draw-> throw 1 dagger at a time, up to twice. I could see an argument that Dueling would only apply to 1 dagger, or the 2nd if 2 are drawn, but that is too low level for me to really care about. Either apply it to the whole thing or not.
    $endgroup$
    – GreySage
    Mar 13 at 18:12










  • $begingroup$
    Well, the text just says as an action you can draw up to two. So in your action you are drawing 1 or 2 daggers and then throwing them immediately.
    $endgroup$
    – NautArch
    Mar 13 at 18:17






  • 5




    $begingroup$
    For what it's worth, DNDBeyond calls it the Bracer of Flying Daggers, no plural on "bracer". I believe calling the item "bracers" is a typo on the OP's part.
    $endgroup$
    – Xirema
    Mar 13 at 18:23







2




2




$begingroup$
But Dueling says " a melee weapon in one hand and no other weapons" wouldn't holding two daggers in one hand count (or one in each hand)? Or are you interpreting the arm band as letting you draw them one at a time?
$endgroup$
– Rubiksmoose
Mar 13 at 18:09





$begingroup$
But Dueling says " a melee weapon in one hand and no other weapons" wouldn't holding two daggers in one hand count (or one in each hand)? Or are you interpreting the arm band as letting you draw them one at a time?
$endgroup$
– Rubiksmoose
Mar 13 at 18:09













$begingroup$
@Rubiksmoose I assumed you would draw-> throw 1 dagger at a time, up to twice. I could see an argument that Dueling would only apply to 1 dagger, or the 2nd if 2 are drawn, but that is too low level for me to really care about. Either apply it to the whole thing or not.
$endgroup$
– GreySage
Mar 13 at 18:12




$begingroup$
@Rubiksmoose I assumed you would draw-> throw 1 dagger at a time, up to twice. I could see an argument that Dueling would only apply to 1 dagger, or the 2nd if 2 are drawn, but that is too low level for me to really care about. Either apply it to the whole thing or not.
$endgroup$
– GreySage
Mar 13 at 18:12












$begingroup$
Well, the text just says as an action you can draw up to two. So in your action you are drawing 1 or 2 daggers and then throwing them immediately.
$endgroup$
– NautArch
Mar 13 at 18:17




$begingroup$
Well, the text just says as an action you can draw up to two. So in your action you are drawing 1 or 2 daggers and then throwing them immediately.
$endgroup$
– NautArch
Mar 13 at 18:17




5




5




$begingroup$
For what it's worth, DNDBeyond calls it the Bracer of Flying Daggers, no plural on "bracer". I believe calling the item "bracers" is a typo on the OP's part.
$endgroup$
– Xirema
Mar 13 at 18:23




$begingroup$
For what it's worth, DNDBeyond calls it the Bracer of Flying Daggers, no plural on "bracer". I believe calling the item "bracers" is a typo on the OP's part.
$endgroup$
– Xirema
Mar 13 at 18:23













4












$begingroup$

Only to one throw, not to both



Short of contradicting evidence, the Daggers summoned by the Bracers of Flying Daggers are in every respect identical to regular, PHB Daggers, except for the added properties that they vanish if not thrown or after they are thrown, and you are allowed to make two attacks with them regardless of your [in-]ability to use the Extra Attacks feature.



Because of this, a character would obviously benefit from their Dueling feature: Daggers are a one-handed weapon, can be thrown with a single hand, and thrown weapons benefit from the Dueling feature*, so you should get the Dueling bonus.



There is a catch though:




Dueling. When you are wielding a melee weapon in one hand and no other weapons, you gain a +2 bonus to damage rolls with that weapon.




If you draw two daggers from the bracer, you'd be holding two weapons, which violates the requirements of the feature. So at the very least, the first dagger thrown would not benefit.



The feature seems to imply that both are thrown at the same time, meaning neither dagger would benefit, but if your DM decides there's a "happens-before" relationship between the two attack rolls (i.e. one definitely happens before the other), then the second dagger would probably benefit.



This becomes moot, however, if you draw only a single dagger and throw it, since the requirements of Dueling would then be satisfied—and since the bracer says you may draw "up to two" daggers, you're fully allowed to draw only a single dagger.



* the top answer in that post contradicts RAI, and I recommend looking at the second answer instead.






share|improve this answer









$endgroup$








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @NautArch As I understand it, you're allowed to draw "up to two" daggers from the bracer, meaning you're allowed to draw (and then throw) only one if you so choose. As I said, if you draw two, then at least one of the daggers (and probably both) would not benefit from Dueling, but if you draw only one, then it's logical that you would benefit.
    $endgroup$
    – Xirema
    Mar 13 at 18:24











  • $begingroup$
    Thanks for the clarification. This looks solid +1.
    $endgroup$
    – NautArch
    Mar 13 at 18:27















4












$begingroup$

Only to one throw, not to both



Short of contradicting evidence, the Daggers summoned by the Bracers of Flying Daggers are in every respect identical to regular, PHB Daggers, except for the added properties that they vanish if not thrown or after they are thrown, and you are allowed to make two attacks with them regardless of your [in-]ability to use the Extra Attacks feature.



Because of this, a character would obviously benefit from their Dueling feature: Daggers are a one-handed weapon, can be thrown with a single hand, and thrown weapons benefit from the Dueling feature*, so you should get the Dueling bonus.



There is a catch though:




Dueling. When you are wielding a melee weapon in one hand and no other weapons, you gain a +2 bonus to damage rolls with that weapon.




If you draw two daggers from the bracer, you'd be holding two weapons, which violates the requirements of the feature. So at the very least, the first dagger thrown would not benefit.



The feature seems to imply that both are thrown at the same time, meaning neither dagger would benefit, but if your DM decides there's a "happens-before" relationship between the two attack rolls (i.e. one definitely happens before the other), then the second dagger would probably benefit.



This becomes moot, however, if you draw only a single dagger and throw it, since the requirements of Dueling would then be satisfied—and since the bracer says you may draw "up to two" daggers, you're fully allowed to draw only a single dagger.



* the top answer in that post contradicts RAI, and I recommend looking at the second answer instead.






share|improve this answer









$endgroup$








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @NautArch As I understand it, you're allowed to draw "up to two" daggers from the bracer, meaning you're allowed to draw (and then throw) only one if you so choose. As I said, if you draw two, then at least one of the daggers (and probably both) would not benefit from Dueling, but if you draw only one, then it's logical that you would benefit.
    $endgroup$
    – Xirema
    Mar 13 at 18:24











  • $begingroup$
    Thanks for the clarification. This looks solid +1.
    $endgroup$
    – NautArch
    Mar 13 at 18:27













4












4








4





$begingroup$

Only to one throw, not to both



Short of contradicting evidence, the Daggers summoned by the Bracers of Flying Daggers are in every respect identical to regular, PHB Daggers, except for the added properties that they vanish if not thrown or after they are thrown, and you are allowed to make two attacks with them regardless of your [in-]ability to use the Extra Attacks feature.



Because of this, a character would obviously benefit from their Dueling feature: Daggers are a one-handed weapon, can be thrown with a single hand, and thrown weapons benefit from the Dueling feature*, so you should get the Dueling bonus.



There is a catch though:




Dueling. When you are wielding a melee weapon in one hand and no other weapons, you gain a +2 bonus to damage rolls with that weapon.




If you draw two daggers from the bracer, you'd be holding two weapons, which violates the requirements of the feature. So at the very least, the first dagger thrown would not benefit.



The feature seems to imply that both are thrown at the same time, meaning neither dagger would benefit, but if your DM decides there's a "happens-before" relationship between the two attack rolls (i.e. one definitely happens before the other), then the second dagger would probably benefit.



This becomes moot, however, if you draw only a single dagger and throw it, since the requirements of Dueling would then be satisfied—and since the bracer says you may draw "up to two" daggers, you're fully allowed to draw only a single dagger.



* the top answer in that post contradicts RAI, and I recommend looking at the second answer instead.






share|improve this answer









$endgroup$



Only to one throw, not to both



Short of contradicting evidence, the Daggers summoned by the Bracers of Flying Daggers are in every respect identical to regular, PHB Daggers, except for the added properties that they vanish if not thrown or after they are thrown, and you are allowed to make two attacks with them regardless of your [in-]ability to use the Extra Attacks feature.



Because of this, a character would obviously benefit from their Dueling feature: Daggers are a one-handed weapon, can be thrown with a single hand, and thrown weapons benefit from the Dueling feature*, so you should get the Dueling bonus.



There is a catch though:




Dueling. When you are wielding a melee weapon in one hand and no other weapons, you gain a +2 bonus to damage rolls with that weapon.




If you draw two daggers from the bracer, you'd be holding two weapons, which violates the requirements of the feature. So at the very least, the first dagger thrown would not benefit.



The feature seems to imply that both are thrown at the same time, meaning neither dagger would benefit, but if your DM decides there's a "happens-before" relationship between the two attack rolls (i.e. one definitely happens before the other), then the second dagger would probably benefit.



This becomes moot, however, if you draw only a single dagger and throw it, since the requirements of Dueling would then be satisfied—and since the bracer says you may draw "up to two" daggers, you're fully allowed to draw only a single dagger.



* the top answer in that post contradicts RAI, and I recommend looking at the second answer instead.







share|improve this answer












share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer










answered Mar 13 at 18:18









XiremaXirema

21.5k263126




21.5k263126







  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @NautArch As I understand it, you're allowed to draw "up to two" daggers from the bracer, meaning you're allowed to draw (and then throw) only one if you so choose. As I said, if you draw two, then at least one of the daggers (and probably both) would not benefit from Dueling, but if you draw only one, then it's logical that you would benefit.
    $endgroup$
    – Xirema
    Mar 13 at 18:24











  • $begingroup$
    Thanks for the clarification. This looks solid +1.
    $endgroup$
    – NautArch
    Mar 13 at 18:27












  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @NautArch As I understand it, you're allowed to draw "up to two" daggers from the bracer, meaning you're allowed to draw (and then throw) only one if you so choose. As I said, if you draw two, then at least one of the daggers (and probably both) would not benefit from Dueling, but if you draw only one, then it's logical that you would benefit.
    $endgroup$
    – Xirema
    Mar 13 at 18:24











  • $begingroup$
    Thanks for the clarification. This looks solid +1.
    $endgroup$
    – NautArch
    Mar 13 at 18:27







1




1




$begingroup$
@NautArch As I understand it, you're allowed to draw "up to two" daggers from the bracer, meaning you're allowed to draw (and then throw) only one if you so choose. As I said, if you draw two, then at least one of the daggers (and probably both) would not benefit from Dueling, but if you draw only one, then it's logical that you would benefit.
$endgroup$
– Xirema
Mar 13 at 18:24





$begingroup$
@NautArch As I understand it, you're allowed to draw "up to two" daggers from the bracer, meaning you're allowed to draw (and then throw) only one if you so choose. As I said, if you draw two, then at least one of the daggers (and probably both) would not benefit from Dueling, but if you draw only one, then it's logical that you would benefit.
$endgroup$
– Xirema
Mar 13 at 18:24













$begingroup$
Thanks for the clarification. This looks solid +1.
$endgroup$
– NautArch
Mar 13 at 18:27




$begingroup$
Thanks for the clarification. This looks solid +1.
$endgroup$
– NautArch
Mar 13 at 18:27











4












$begingroup$

Dueling will benefit in this situation depending on the interpretation you use



The Dueling fighting style states:




When you are wielding a melee weapon in one hand and no other weapons, you gain a +2 bonus to damage rolls with that weapon.




Daggers appear on the melee weapon table and the dueling fighting style requires a melee weapon. It does not say that it requires a melee weapon attack. This sounds like we're on the right track but, in throwing the melee weapon to make a ranged attack, it is no longer in your hand.



One argument is that the dagger is in hand at the moment the attack is initiated. However, the attack does not become a ranged attack until the instant the weapon leaves the hand. Therefore, the dagger not being in the hand is integral to it being a ranged attack (not a melee attack) and, as such, Dueling would not benefit the knives if they are thrown.




That all said, Jeremy Crawford has stated in a (now unofficial) Tweet that you can interpret the Dueling to allow the bonus to apply to ranged attacks. This is outside of the PHB but it's from the lead rules designer, so one could make a case either way and have strong support for the argument. As such, it probably depends on which argument the DM finds more persuasive.






share|improve this answer











$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    That disagrees with the logic of the accepted answer to the linked question.
    $endgroup$
    – Ben Barden
    Mar 13 at 18:08






  • 5




    $begingroup$
    @BenBarden accepted only means it was most useful to OP. It doesn't automatically mean correct. FWIW the votes seem pretty close between the first and second answer. Hardly decisive I'd say. Also, neither directly means that the logic in this answer is incorrect.
    $endgroup$
    – Rubiksmoose
    Mar 13 at 18:12











  • $begingroup$
    @ben I think Miniman and I have the same interpretation but he concedes that Jeremy Crawford, a higher authority, allows the interpretation that it will work. I will add the same caveat to this answer.
    $endgroup$
    – Rykara
    Mar 13 at 18:13











  • $begingroup$
    @Rykara though as that ruling came from a tweet, no longer officially a higher power regardless. RAI at most.
    $endgroup$
    – Rubiksmoose
    Mar 13 at 18:14







  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @rubik Can't edit my comment anymore but I meant "higher power than me," not the PHB, sorry. Thanks for editing to help clarify.
    $endgroup$
    – Rykara
    Mar 13 at 18:27















4












$begingroup$

Dueling will benefit in this situation depending on the interpretation you use



The Dueling fighting style states:




When you are wielding a melee weapon in one hand and no other weapons, you gain a +2 bonus to damage rolls with that weapon.




Daggers appear on the melee weapon table and the dueling fighting style requires a melee weapon. It does not say that it requires a melee weapon attack. This sounds like we're on the right track but, in throwing the melee weapon to make a ranged attack, it is no longer in your hand.



One argument is that the dagger is in hand at the moment the attack is initiated. However, the attack does not become a ranged attack until the instant the weapon leaves the hand. Therefore, the dagger not being in the hand is integral to it being a ranged attack (not a melee attack) and, as such, Dueling would not benefit the knives if they are thrown.




That all said, Jeremy Crawford has stated in a (now unofficial) Tweet that you can interpret the Dueling to allow the bonus to apply to ranged attacks. This is outside of the PHB but it's from the lead rules designer, so one could make a case either way and have strong support for the argument. As such, it probably depends on which argument the DM finds more persuasive.






share|improve this answer











$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    That disagrees with the logic of the accepted answer to the linked question.
    $endgroup$
    – Ben Barden
    Mar 13 at 18:08






  • 5




    $begingroup$
    @BenBarden accepted only means it was most useful to OP. It doesn't automatically mean correct. FWIW the votes seem pretty close between the first and second answer. Hardly decisive I'd say. Also, neither directly means that the logic in this answer is incorrect.
    $endgroup$
    – Rubiksmoose
    Mar 13 at 18:12











  • $begingroup$
    @ben I think Miniman and I have the same interpretation but he concedes that Jeremy Crawford, a higher authority, allows the interpretation that it will work. I will add the same caveat to this answer.
    $endgroup$
    – Rykara
    Mar 13 at 18:13











  • $begingroup$
    @Rykara though as that ruling came from a tweet, no longer officially a higher power regardless. RAI at most.
    $endgroup$
    – Rubiksmoose
    Mar 13 at 18:14







  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @rubik Can't edit my comment anymore but I meant "higher power than me," not the PHB, sorry. Thanks for editing to help clarify.
    $endgroup$
    – Rykara
    Mar 13 at 18:27













4












4








4





$begingroup$

Dueling will benefit in this situation depending on the interpretation you use



The Dueling fighting style states:




When you are wielding a melee weapon in one hand and no other weapons, you gain a +2 bonus to damage rolls with that weapon.




Daggers appear on the melee weapon table and the dueling fighting style requires a melee weapon. It does not say that it requires a melee weapon attack. This sounds like we're on the right track but, in throwing the melee weapon to make a ranged attack, it is no longer in your hand.



One argument is that the dagger is in hand at the moment the attack is initiated. However, the attack does not become a ranged attack until the instant the weapon leaves the hand. Therefore, the dagger not being in the hand is integral to it being a ranged attack (not a melee attack) and, as such, Dueling would not benefit the knives if they are thrown.




That all said, Jeremy Crawford has stated in a (now unofficial) Tweet that you can interpret the Dueling to allow the bonus to apply to ranged attacks. This is outside of the PHB but it's from the lead rules designer, so one could make a case either way and have strong support for the argument. As such, it probably depends on which argument the DM finds more persuasive.






share|improve this answer











$endgroup$



Dueling will benefit in this situation depending on the interpretation you use



The Dueling fighting style states:




When you are wielding a melee weapon in one hand and no other weapons, you gain a +2 bonus to damage rolls with that weapon.




Daggers appear on the melee weapon table and the dueling fighting style requires a melee weapon. It does not say that it requires a melee weapon attack. This sounds like we're on the right track but, in throwing the melee weapon to make a ranged attack, it is no longer in your hand.



One argument is that the dagger is in hand at the moment the attack is initiated. However, the attack does not become a ranged attack until the instant the weapon leaves the hand. Therefore, the dagger not being in the hand is integral to it being a ranged attack (not a melee attack) and, as such, Dueling would not benefit the knives if they are thrown.




That all said, Jeremy Crawford has stated in a (now unofficial) Tweet that you can interpret the Dueling to allow the bonus to apply to ranged attacks. This is outside of the PHB but it's from the lead rules designer, so one could make a case either way and have strong support for the argument. As such, it probably depends on which argument the DM finds more persuasive.







share|improve this answer














share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer








edited Mar 13 at 22:58

























answered Mar 13 at 17:57









RykaraRykara

3,863835




3,863835











  • $begingroup$
    That disagrees with the logic of the accepted answer to the linked question.
    $endgroup$
    – Ben Barden
    Mar 13 at 18:08






  • 5




    $begingroup$
    @BenBarden accepted only means it was most useful to OP. It doesn't automatically mean correct. FWIW the votes seem pretty close between the first and second answer. Hardly decisive I'd say. Also, neither directly means that the logic in this answer is incorrect.
    $endgroup$
    – Rubiksmoose
    Mar 13 at 18:12











  • $begingroup$
    @ben I think Miniman and I have the same interpretation but he concedes that Jeremy Crawford, a higher authority, allows the interpretation that it will work. I will add the same caveat to this answer.
    $endgroup$
    – Rykara
    Mar 13 at 18:13











  • $begingroup$
    @Rykara though as that ruling came from a tweet, no longer officially a higher power regardless. RAI at most.
    $endgroup$
    – Rubiksmoose
    Mar 13 at 18:14







  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @rubik Can't edit my comment anymore but I meant "higher power than me," not the PHB, sorry. Thanks for editing to help clarify.
    $endgroup$
    – Rykara
    Mar 13 at 18:27
















  • $begingroup$
    That disagrees with the logic of the accepted answer to the linked question.
    $endgroup$
    – Ben Barden
    Mar 13 at 18:08






  • 5




    $begingroup$
    @BenBarden accepted only means it was most useful to OP. It doesn't automatically mean correct. FWIW the votes seem pretty close between the first and second answer. Hardly decisive I'd say. Also, neither directly means that the logic in this answer is incorrect.
    $endgroup$
    – Rubiksmoose
    Mar 13 at 18:12











  • $begingroup$
    @ben I think Miniman and I have the same interpretation but he concedes that Jeremy Crawford, a higher authority, allows the interpretation that it will work. I will add the same caveat to this answer.
    $endgroup$
    – Rykara
    Mar 13 at 18:13











  • $begingroup$
    @Rykara though as that ruling came from a tweet, no longer officially a higher power regardless. RAI at most.
    $endgroup$
    – Rubiksmoose
    Mar 13 at 18:14







  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @rubik Can't edit my comment anymore but I meant "higher power than me," not the PHB, sorry. Thanks for editing to help clarify.
    $endgroup$
    – Rykara
    Mar 13 at 18:27















$begingroup$
That disagrees with the logic of the accepted answer to the linked question.
$endgroup$
– Ben Barden
Mar 13 at 18:08




$begingroup$
That disagrees with the logic of the accepted answer to the linked question.
$endgroup$
– Ben Barden
Mar 13 at 18:08




5




5




$begingroup$
@BenBarden accepted only means it was most useful to OP. It doesn't automatically mean correct. FWIW the votes seem pretty close between the first and second answer. Hardly decisive I'd say. Also, neither directly means that the logic in this answer is incorrect.
$endgroup$
– Rubiksmoose
Mar 13 at 18:12





$begingroup$
@BenBarden accepted only means it was most useful to OP. It doesn't automatically mean correct. FWIW the votes seem pretty close between the first and second answer. Hardly decisive I'd say. Also, neither directly means that the logic in this answer is incorrect.
$endgroup$
– Rubiksmoose
Mar 13 at 18:12













$begingroup$
@ben I think Miniman and I have the same interpretation but he concedes that Jeremy Crawford, a higher authority, allows the interpretation that it will work. I will add the same caveat to this answer.
$endgroup$
– Rykara
Mar 13 at 18:13





$begingroup$
@ben I think Miniman and I have the same interpretation but he concedes that Jeremy Crawford, a higher authority, allows the interpretation that it will work. I will add the same caveat to this answer.
$endgroup$
– Rykara
Mar 13 at 18:13













$begingroup$
@Rykara though as that ruling came from a tweet, no longer officially a higher power regardless. RAI at most.
$endgroup$
– Rubiksmoose
Mar 13 at 18:14





$begingroup$
@Rykara though as that ruling came from a tweet, no longer officially a higher power regardless. RAI at most.
$endgroup$
– Rubiksmoose
Mar 13 at 18:14





1




1




$begingroup$
@rubik Can't edit my comment anymore but I meant "higher power than me," not the PHB, sorry. Thanks for editing to help clarify.
$endgroup$
– Rykara
Mar 13 at 18:27




$begingroup$
@rubik Can't edit my comment anymore but I meant "higher power than me," not the PHB, sorry. Thanks for editing to help clarify.
$endgroup$
– Rykara
Mar 13 at 18:27

















draft saved

draft discarded
















































Thanks for contributing an answer to Role-playing Games Stack Exchange!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid


  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2frpg.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f143072%2fdoes-the-bracer-of-flying-daggers-benefit-from-the-dueling-fighting-style%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

Lowndes Grove History Architecture References Navigation menu32°48′6″N 79°57′58″W / 32.80167°N 79.96611°W / 32.80167; -79.9661132°48′6″N 79°57′58″W / 32.80167°N 79.96611°W / 32.80167; -79.9661178002500"National Register Information System"Historic houses of South Carolina"Lowndes Grove""+32° 48' 6.00", −79° 57' 58.00""Lowndes Grove, Charleston County (260 St. Margaret St., Charleston)""Lowndes Grove"The Charleston ExpositionIt Happened in South Carolina"Lowndes Grove (House), Saint Margaret Street & Sixth Avenue, Charleston, Charleston County, SC(Photographs)"Plantations of the Carolina Low Countrye

random experiment with two different functions on unit interval Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara Planned maintenance scheduled April 23, 2019 at 00:00UTC (8:00pm US/Eastern)Random variable and probability space notionsRandom Walk with EdgesFinding functions where the increase over a random interval is Poisson distributedNumber of days until dayCan an observed event in fact be of zero probability?Unit random processmodels of coins and uniform distributionHow to get the number of successes given $n$ trials , probability $P$ and a random variable $X$Absorbing Markov chain in a computer. Is “almost every” turned into always convergence in computer executions?Stopped random walk is not uniformly integrable

How should I support this large drywall patch? Planned maintenance scheduled April 23, 2019 at 00:00UTC (8:00pm US/Eastern) Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara Unicorn Meta Zoo #1: Why another podcast?How do I cover large gaps in drywall?How do I keep drywall around a patch from crumbling?Can I glue a second layer of drywall?How to patch long strip on drywall?Large drywall patch: how to avoid bulging seams?Drywall Mesh Patch vs. Bulge? To remove or not to remove?How to fix this drywall job?Prep drywall before backsplashWhat's the best way to fix this horrible drywall patch job?Drywall patching using 3M Patch Plus Primer