The integral of a multivariable Dirac delta functionResidue with half order pole?How does a Dirac delta function operate on a Fourier-Stieltjes integral?Integral of delta dirac functionNeed help with an integral involving the Dirac delta functionIntegrating the Dirac Delta FunctionA limit and a delta function in an integral.Monte Carlo For Integral Involving Dirac-DeltaComputing integral involving Dirac Delta FunctionModelling Dirac Delta Function and Proving its Area PropertyLimit of integral involving Dirac Delta

Started in 1987 vs. Starting in 1987

Trouble reading roman numeral notation with flats

What is the tangent at a sharp point on a curve?

Reasons for having MCU pin-states default to pull-up/down out of reset

How can I, as DM, avoid the Conga Line of Death occurring when implementing some form of flanking rule?

Can a Knock spell open the door to Mordenkainen's Magnificent Mansion?

Reason why a kingside attack is not justified

Offset in split text content

Asserting that Atheism and Theism are both faith based positions

What (if any) is the reason to buy in small local stores?

If the Dominion rule using their Jem'Hadar troops, why is their life expectancy so low?

Did I make a mistake by ccing email to boss to others?

Make a Bowl of Alphabet Soup

What is the meaning of "You've never met a graph you didn't like?"

Why is participating in the European Parliamentary elections used as a threat?

When is the exact date for EOL of Ubuntu 14.04 LTS?

Friend wants my recommendation but I don't want to give it to him

Are hand made posters acceptable in Academia?

A seasonal riddle

I keep switching characters, how do I stop?

Are all namekians brothers?

How do you justify more code being written by following clean code practices?

1 John in Luther’s Bibel

Connection Between Knot Theory and Number Theory



The integral of a multivariable Dirac delta function


Residue with half order pole?How does a Dirac delta function operate on a Fourier-Stieltjes integral?Integral of delta dirac functionNeed help with an integral involving the Dirac delta functionIntegrating the Dirac Delta FunctionA limit and a delta function in an integral.Monte Carlo For Integral Involving Dirac-DeltaComputing integral involving Dirac Delta FunctionModelling Dirac Delta Function and Proving its Area PropertyLimit of integral involving Dirac Delta













1












$begingroup$


Does anybody know how to perform the following integral analytically:
beginequation
I=int^infty_eV/2 depsilon_1 int_-infty^-eV/2 depsilon_2 int^infty_0 depsilon' int_-infty^0 depsilon,delta(epsilon_2-epsilon_1+epsilon-epsilon')
endequation

Above $delta(x)$ is the Dirac's delta function.



I have used Mathematica to do this, and it gives me $I = -frac(eV)^36$.










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$



migrated from physics.stackexchange.com Mar 13 at 18:16


This question came from our site for active researchers, academics and students of physics.

















  • $begingroup$
    Have you tried anything beyond Mathematica? What have you attempted on your own to answer this?
    $endgroup$
    – Aaron Stevens
    Mar 13 at 16:26










  • $begingroup$
    Also, I am getting $0$ for the integral if $eV>0$
    $endgroup$
    – Aaron Stevens
    Mar 13 at 16:35















1












$begingroup$


Does anybody know how to perform the following integral analytically:
beginequation
I=int^infty_eV/2 depsilon_1 int_-infty^-eV/2 depsilon_2 int^infty_0 depsilon' int_-infty^0 depsilon,delta(epsilon_2-epsilon_1+epsilon-epsilon')
endequation

Above $delta(x)$ is the Dirac's delta function.



I have used Mathematica to do this, and it gives me $I = -frac(eV)^36$.










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$



migrated from physics.stackexchange.com Mar 13 at 18:16


This question came from our site for active researchers, academics and students of physics.

















  • $begingroup$
    Have you tried anything beyond Mathematica? What have you attempted on your own to answer this?
    $endgroup$
    – Aaron Stevens
    Mar 13 at 16:26










  • $begingroup$
    Also, I am getting $0$ for the integral if $eV>0$
    $endgroup$
    – Aaron Stevens
    Mar 13 at 16:35













1












1








1





$begingroup$


Does anybody know how to perform the following integral analytically:
beginequation
I=int^infty_eV/2 depsilon_1 int_-infty^-eV/2 depsilon_2 int^infty_0 depsilon' int_-infty^0 depsilon,delta(epsilon_2-epsilon_1+epsilon-epsilon')
endequation

Above $delta(x)$ is the Dirac's delta function.



I have used Mathematica to do this, and it gives me $I = -frac(eV)^36$.










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$




Does anybody know how to perform the following integral analytically:
beginequation
I=int^infty_eV/2 depsilon_1 int_-infty^-eV/2 depsilon_2 int^infty_0 depsilon' int_-infty^0 depsilon,delta(epsilon_2-epsilon_1+epsilon-epsilon')
endequation

Above $delta(x)$ is the Dirac's delta function.



I have used Mathematica to do this, and it gives me $I = -frac(eV)^36$.







integration






share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question











share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question










asked Mar 13 at 16:19









ChangChang

61




61




migrated from physics.stackexchange.com Mar 13 at 18:16


This question came from our site for active researchers, academics and students of physics.









migrated from physics.stackexchange.com Mar 13 at 18:16


This question came from our site for active researchers, academics and students of physics.













  • $begingroup$
    Have you tried anything beyond Mathematica? What have you attempted on your own to answer this?
    $endgroup$
    – Aaron Stevens
    Mar 13 at 16:26










  • $begingroup$
    Also, I am getting $0$ for the integral if $eV>0$
    $endgroup$
    – Aaron Stevens
    Mar 13 at 16:35
















  • $begingroup$
    Have you tried anything beyond Mathematica? What have you attempted on your own to answer this?
    $endgroup$
    – Aaron Stevens
    Mar 13 at 16:26










  • $begingroup$
    Also, I am getting $0$ for the integral if $eV>0$
    $endgroup$
    – Aaron Stevens
    Mar 13 at 16:35















$begingroup$
Have you tried anything beyond Mathematica? What have you attempted on your own to answer this?
$endgroup$
– Aaron Stevens
Mar 13 at 16:26




$begingroup$
Have you tried anything beyond Mathematica? What have you attempted on your own to answer this?
$endgroup$
– Aaron Stevens
Mar 13 at 16:26












$begingroup$
Also, I am getting $0$ for the integral if $eV>0$
$endgroup$
– Aaron Stevens
Mar 13 at 16:35




$begingroup$
Also, I am getting $0$ for the integral if $eV>0$
$endgroup$
– Aaron Stevens
Mar 13 at 16:35










2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes


















2












$begingroup$

The Dirac delta returns $1$ if its argument vanishes within the interval of integration, or zero otherwise. Doing this for the innermost integral, we get
$$
I
=int^infty_eV/2 depsilon_1 int_-infty^-eV/2 depsilon_2 int^infty_0 depsilon^prime , theta(epsilon_2-epsilon_1-epsilon^prime)
,
$$

in terms of the Heaviside theta function (i.e. $theta(x)=1$ for $x>0$, $theta(x)=0$ for $x<0$), because if $epsilon_2-epsilon_1-epsilon^prime<0$ is positive then there exists an $epsilon<0$ such that $epsilon_2-epsilon_1+epsilon-epsilon^prime=0$, and if it's negative, then $epsilon_2-epsilon_1+epsilon-epsilon^prime<0$ for all negative $epsilon$.



Pushing on, if $epsilon_2-epsilon_1$ is negative, then $epsilon_2-epsilon_1-epsilon^prime$ for all $epsilon^prime>0$, so the integral comes to zero, while if it is positive then the integral effectively runs for $epsilon^primein[0,epsilon_2-epsilon_1]$, which means that we can write
beginalign
I
& =
int^infty_eV/2 depsilon_1 int_-infty^-eV/2 depsilon_2 theta(epsilon_2-epsilon_1) int^epsilon_2-epsilon_1_0 depsilon^prime
\ & =
int^infty_eV/2 depsilon_1 int_-infty^-eV/2 depsilon_2
(epsilon_2-epsilon_1)
theta(epsilon_2-epsilon_1)
.
endalign



Furthermore, for any given $epsilon_1>eV/2$, the $epsilon_2$ integrand vanishes whenever $epsilon_2-epsilon_1<0$, i.e. when $epsilon_2<epsilon_1$, so we can get rid of the theta function and substitute in $epsilon_1$ as the lower integral limit:
beginalign
I
& =
int^infty_eV/2 depsilon_1
theta(-eV/2-epsilon_1)
int_epsilon_1^-eV/2 depsilon_2,
(epsilon_2-epsilon_1)
,
endalign

with the remaining theta function indicating that if $epsilon_1> -eV/2$ the previous theta-function integration $int_-infty^-eV/2 depsilon_2 theta(epsilon_2-epsilon_1) cdots$ has a vanishing integral throughout its domain.



Finally, to get rid of the theta functions in the integrand altogether, we note that for the integral to integrate to anything nonzero, there needs to be a range of $epsilon_1$ such that both $-eV/2-epsilon_1> 0$ and $epsilon_1>eV/2$, or in other words
$$
frac12 eV < epsilon_1 < -frac12 eV,
$$

which can only be the case if $eV<0$. To express this simply, just add one final theta function on the outside:
beginalign
I
& =
theta(-eV)
int^infty_eV/2
int_epsilon_1^-eV/2
(epsilon_2-epsilon_1)
,depsilon_2
,depsilon_1
.
endalign



The rest is just clean integration as usual.






share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$




















    0












    $begingroup$

    E.P., thank you for your answer. Integrating out the first variableis the most crucial step. When I was solving this problem, I first tried to reduce the multivariable Dirac delta to a single-variable one. At the end, it became very difficult to analyze that under which circumstance does the Dirac delta become nonzero.



    In the following, I start with the last equation and finish the rest of the calcuations:



    beginequation
    I = int^infty_eV/2depsilon_1 int^-eV/2_epsilon_1depsilon_2(epsilon_2-epsilon_1)
    endequation

    Here, $epsilon_1$ becomes the lower bound of $epsilon_2$, indicating that $epsilon_1 leq -eV/2$. Thus, we should change the range of the integration over $epsilon_1$ above accordingly, i.e.
    beginequation
    I = int^-eV/2_eV/2depsilon_1 int^-eV/2_epsilon_1depsilon_2(epsilon_2-epsilon_1)=int^-eV/2_eV/2depsilon_1 left[frac(eV)^28+fracepsilon_1^22 + fraceV2epsilon_1right]=-frac(eV)^36.quad Q.E.D.
    endequation

    Thanks!






    share|cite|improve this answer








    New contributor




    Chang is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
    Check out our Code of Conduct.






    $endgroup$












    • $begingroup$
      No, that's still not right - it returns the correct value if $eV<0$, but it does nothing to enforce that. Note that the initial integral has a positive integrand over positively-ordered intervals, which means that the value of the integral cannot be negative.
      $endgroup$
      – E.P.
      Mar 14 at 11:16










    Your Answer





    StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
    return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
    StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
    StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
    );
    );
    , "mathjax-editing");

    StackExchange.ready(function()
    var channelOptions =
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "69"
    ;
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
    createEditor();
    );

    else
    createEditor();

    );

    function createEditor()
    StackExchange.prepareEditor(
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
    convertImagesToLinks: true,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: 10,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader:
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    ,
    noCode: true, onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    );



    );













    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function ()
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3146964%2fthe-integral-of-a-multivariable-dirac-delta-function%23new-answer', 'question_page');

    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    2 Answers
    2






    active

    oldest

    votes








    2 Answers
    2






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    2












    $begingroup$

    The Dirac delta returns $1$ if its argument vanishes within the interval of integration, or zero otherwise. Doing this for the innermost integral, we get
    $$
    I
    =int^infty_eV/2 depsilon_1 int_-infty^-eV/2 depsilon_2 int^infty_0 depsilon^prime , theta(epsilon_2-epsilon_1-epsilon^prime)
    ,
    $$

    in terms of the Heaviside theta function (i.e. $theta(x)=1$ for $x>0$, $theta(x)=0$ for $x<0$), because if $epsilon_2-epsilon_1-epsilon^prime<0$ is positive then there exists an $epsilon<0$ such that $epsilon_2-epsilon_1+epsilon-epsilon^prime=0$, and if it's negative, then $epsilon_2-epsilon_1+epsilon-epsilon^prime<0$ for all negative $epsilon$.



    Pushing on, if $epsilon_2-epsilon_1$ is negative, then $epsilon_2-epsilon_1-epsilon^prime$ for all $epsilon^prime>0$, so the integral comes to zero, while if it is positive then the integral effectively runs for $epsilon^primein[0,epsilon_2-epsilon_1]$, which means that we can write
    beginalign
    I
    & =
    int^infty_eV/2 depsilon_1 int_-infty^-eV/2 depsilon_2 theta(epsilon_2-epsilon_1) int^epsilon_2-epsilon_1_0 depsilon^prime
    \ & =
    int^infty_eV/2 depsilon_1 int_-infty^-eV/2 depsilon_2
    (epsilon_2-epsilon_1)
    theta(epsilon_2-epsilon_1)
    .
    endalign



    Furthermore, for any given $epsilon_1>eV/2$, the $epsilon_2$ integrand vanishes whenever $epsilon_2-epsilon_1<0$, i.e. when $epsilon_2<epsilon_1$, so we can get rid of the theta function and substitute in $epsilon_1$ as the lower integral limit:
    beginalign
    I
    & =
    int^infty_eV/2 depsilon_1
    theta(-eV/2-epsilon_1)
    int_epsilon_1^-eV/2 depsilon_2,
    (epsilon_2-epsilon_1)
    ,
    endalign

    with the remaining theta function indicating that if $epsilon_1> -eV/2$ the previous theta-function integration $int_-infty^-eV/2 depsilon_2 theta(epsilon_2-epsilon_1) cdots$ has a vanishing integral throughout its domain.



    Finally, to get rid of the theta functions in the integrand altogether, we note that for the integral to integrate to anything nonzero, there needs to be a range of $epsilon_1$ such that both $-eV/2-epsilon_1> 0$ and $epsilon_1>eV/2$, or in other words
    $$
    frac12 eV < epsilon_1 < -frac12 eV,
    $$

    which can only be the case if $eV<0$. To express this simply, just add one final theta function on the outside:
    beginalign
    I
    & =
    theta(-eV)
    int^infty_eV/2
    int_epsilon_1^-eV/2
    (epsilon_2-epsilon_1)
    ,depsilon_2
    ,depsilon_1
    .
    endalign



    The rest is just clean integration as usual.






    share|cite|improve this answer











    $endgroup$

















      2












      $begingroup$

      The Dirac delta returns $1$ if its argument vanishes within the interval of integration, or zero otherwise. Doing this for the innermost integral, we get
      $$
      I
      =int^infty_eV/2 depsilon_1 int_-infty^-eV/2 depsilon_2 int^infty_0 depsilon^prime , theta(epsilon_2-epsilon_1-epsilon^prime)
      ,
      $$

      in terms of the Heaviside theta function (i.e. $theta(x)=1$ for $x>0$, $theta(x)=0$ for $x<0$), because if $epsilon_2-epsilon_1-epsilon^prime<0$ is positive then there exists an $epsilon<0$ such that $epsilon_2-epsilon_1+epsilon-epsilon^prime=0$, and if it's negative, then $epsilon_2-epsilon_1+epsilon-epsilon^prime<0$ for all negative $epsilon$.



      Pushing on, if $epsilon_2-epsilon_1$ is negative, then $epsilon_2-epsilon_1-epsilon^prime$ for all $epsilon^prime>0$, so the integral comes to zero, while if it is positive then the integral effectively runs for $epsilon^primein[0,epsilon_2-epsilon_1]$, which means that we can write
      beginalign
      I
      & =
      int^infty_eV/2 depsilon_1 int_-infty^-eV/2 depsilon_2 theta(epsilon_2-epsilon_1) int^epsilon_2-epsilon_1_0 depsilon^prime
      \ & =
      int^infty_eV/2 depsilon_1 int_-infty^-eV/2 depsilon_2
      (epsilon_2-epsilon_1)
      theta(epsilon_2-epsilon_1)
      .
      endalign



      Furthermore, for any given $epsilon_1>eV/2$, the $epsilon_2$ integrand vanishes whenever $epsilon_2-epsilon_1<0$, i.e. when $epsilon_2<epsilon_1$, so we can get rid of the theta function and substitute in $epsilon_1$ as the lower integral limit:
      beginalign
      I
      & =
      int^infty_eV/2 depsilon_1
      theta(-eV/2-epsilon_1)
      int_epsilon_1^-eV/2 depsilon_2,
      (epsilon_2-epsilon_1)
      ,
      endalign

      with the remaining theta function indicating that if $epsilon_1> -eV/2$ the previous theta-function integration $int_-infty^-eV/2 depsilon_2 theta(epsilon_2-epsilon_1) cdots$ has a vanishing integral throughout its domain.



      Finally, to get rid of the theta functions in the integrand altogether, we note that for the integral to integrate to anything nonzero, there needs to be a range of $epsilon_1$ such that both $-eV/2-epsilon_1> 0$ and $epsilon_1>eV/2$, or in other words
      $$
      frac12 eV < epsilon_1 < -frac12 eV,
      $$

      which can only be the case if $eV<0$. To express this simply, just add one final theta function on the outside:
      beginalign
      I
      & =
      theta(-eV)
      int^infty_eV/2
      int_epsilon_1^-eV/2
      (epsilon_2-epsilon_1)
      ,depsilon_2
      ,depsilon_1
      .
      endalign



      The rest is just clean integration as usual.






      share|cite|improve this answer











      $endgroup$















        2












        2








        2





        $begingroup$

        The Dirac delta returns $1$ if its argument vanishes within the interval of integration, or zero otherwise. Doing this for the innermost integral, we get
        $$
        I
        =int^infty_eV/2 depsilon_1 int_-infty^-eV/2 depsilon_2 int^infty_0 depsilon^prime , theta(epsilon_2-epsilon_1-epsilon^prime)
        ,
        $$

        in terms of the Heaviside theta function (i.e. $theta(x)=1$ for $x>0$, $theta(x)=0$ for $x<0$), because if $epsilon_2-epsilon_1-epsilon^prime<0$ is positive then there exists an $epsilon<0$ such that $epsilon_2-epsilon_1+epsilon-epsilon^prime=0$, and if it's negative, then $epsilon_2-epsilon_1+epsilon-epsilon^prime<0$ for all negative $epsilon$.



        Pushing on, if $epsilon_2-epsilon_1$ is negative, then $epsilon_2-epsilon_1-epsilon^prime$ for all $epsilon^prime>0$, so the integral comes to zero, while if it is positive then the integral effectively runs for $epsilon^primein[0,epsilon_2-epsilon_1]$, which means that we can write
        beginalign
        I
        & =
        int^infty_eV/2 depsilon_1 int_-infty^-eV/2 depsilon_2 theta(epsilon_2-epsilon_1) int^epsilon_2-epsilon_1_0 depsilon^prime
        \ & =
        int^infty_eV/2 depsilon_1 int_-infty^-eV/2 depsilon_2
        (epsilon_2-epsilon_1)
        theta(epsilon_2-epsilon_1)
        .
        endalign



        Furthermore, for any given $epsilon_1>eV/2$, the $epsilon_2$ integrand vanishes whenever $epsilon_2-epsilon_1<0$, i.e. when $epsilon_2<epsilon_1$, so we can get rid of the theta function and substitute in $epsilon_1$ as the lower integral limit:
        beginalign
        I
        & =
        int^infty_eV/2 depsilon_1
        theta(-eV/2-epsilon_1)
        int_epsilon_1^-eV/2 depsilon_2,
        (epsilon_2-epsilon_1)
        ,
        endalign

        with the remaining theta function indicating that if $epsilon_1> -eV/2$ the previous theta-function integration $int_-infty^-eV/2 depsilon_2 theta(epsilon_2-epsilon_1) cdots$ has a vanishing integral throughout its domain.



        Finally, to get rid of the theta functions in the integrand altogether, we note that for the integral to integrate to anything nonzero, there needs to be a range of $epsilon_1$ such that both $-eV/2-epsilon_1> 0$ and $epsilon_1>eV/2$, or in other words
        $$
        frac12 eV < epsilon_1 < -frac12 eV,
        $$

        which can only be the case if $eV<0$. To express this simply, just add one final theta function on the outside:
        beginalign
        I
        & =
        theta(-eV)
        int^infty_eV/2
        int_epsilon_1^-eV/2
        (epsilon_2-epsilon_1)
        ,depsilon_2
        ,depsilon_1
        .
        endalign



        The rest is just clean integration as usual.






        share|cite|improve this answer











        $endgroup$



        The Dirac delta returns $1$ if its argument vanishes within the interval of integration, or zero otherwise. Doing this for the innermost integral, we get
        $$
        I
        =int^infty_eV/2 depsilon_1 int_-infty^-eV/2 depsilon_2 int^infty_0 depsilon^prime , theta(epsilon_2-epsilon_1-epsilon^prime)
        ,
        $$

        in terms of the Heaviside theta function (i.e. $theta(x)=1$ for $x>0$, $theta(x)=0$ for $x<0$), because if $epsilon_2-epsilon_1-epsilon^prime<0$ is positive then there exists an $epsilon<0$ such that $epsilon_2-epsilon_1+epsilon-epsilon^prime=0$, and if it's negative, then $epsilon_2-epsilon_1+epsilon-epsilon^prime<0$ for all negative $epsilon$.



        Pushing on, if $epsilon_2-epsilon_1$ is negative, then $epsilon_2-epsilon_1-epsilon^prime$ for all $epsilon^prime>0$, so the integral comes to zero, while if it is positive then the integral effectively runs for $epsilon^primein[0,epsilon_2-epsilon_1]$, which means that we can write
        beginalign
        I
        & =
        int^infty_eV/2 depsilon_1 int_-infty^-eV/2 depsilon_2 theta(epsilon_2-epsilon_1) int^epsilon_2-epsilon_1_0 depsilon^prime
        \ & =
        int^infty_eV/2 depsilon_1 int_-infty^-eV/2 depsilon_2
        (epsilon_2-epsilon_1)
        theta(epsilon_2-epsilon_1)
        .
        endalign



        Furthermore, for any given $epsilon_1>eV/2$, the $epsilon_2$ integrand vanishes whenever $epsilon_2-epsilon_1<0$, i.e. when $epsilon_2<epsilon_1$, so we can get rid of the theta function and substitute in $epsilon_1$ as the lower integral limit:
        beginalign
        I
        & =
        int^infty_eV/2 depsilon_1
        theta(-eV/2-epsilon_1)
        int_epsilon_1^-eV/2 depsilon_2,
        (epsilon_2-epsilon_1)
        ,
        endalign

        with the remaining theta function indicating that if $epsilon_1> -eV/2$ the previous theta-function integration $int_-infty^-eV/2 depsilon_2 theta(epsilon_2-epsilon_1) cdots$ has a vanishing integral throughout its domain.



        Finally, to get rid of the theta functions in the integrand altogether, we note that for the integral to integrate to anything nonzero, there needs to be a range of $epsilon_1$ such that both $-eV/2-epsilon_1> 0$ and $epsilon_1>eV/2$, or in other words
        $$
        frac12 eV < epsilon_1 < -frac12 eV,
        $$

        which can only be the case if $eV<0$. To express this simply, just add one final theta function on the outside:
        beginalign
        I
        & =
        theta(-eV)
        int^infty_eV/2
        int_epsilon_1^-eV/2
        (epsilon_2-epsilon_1)
        ,depsilon_2
        ,depsilon_1
        .
        endalign



        The rest is just clean integration as usual.







        share|cite|improve this answer














        share|cite|improve this answer



        share|cite|improve this answer








        edited Mar 14 at 6:32









        J.G.

        30.8k23149




        30.8k23149










        answered Mar 13 at 16:54









        E.P.E.P.

        1,5401125




        1,5401125





















            0












            $begingroup$

            E.P., thank you for your answer. Integrating out the first variableis the most crucial step. When I was solving this problem, I first tried to reduce the multivariable Dirac delta to a single-variable one. At the end, it became very difficult to analyze that under which circumstance does the Dirac delta become nonzero.



            In the following, I start with the last equation and finish the rest of the calcuations:



            beginequation
            I = int^infty_eV/2depsilon_1 int^-eV/2_epsilon_1depsilon_2(epsilon_2-epsilon_1)
            endequation

            Here, $epsilon_1$ becomes the lower bound of $epsilon_2$, indicating that $epsilon_1 leq -eV/2$. Thus, we should change the range of the integration over $epsilon_1$ above accordingly, i.e.
            beginequation
            I = int^-eV/2_eV/2depsilon_1 int^-eV/2_epsilon_1depsilon_2(epsilon_2-epsilon_1)=int^-eV/2_eV/2depsilon_1 left[frac(eV)^28+fracepsilon_1^22 + fraceV2epsilon_1right]=-frac(eV)^36.quad Q.E.D.
            endequation

            Thanks!






            share|cite|improve this answer








            New contributor




            Chang is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
            Check out our Code of Conduct.






            $endgroup$












            • $begingroup$
              No, that's still not right - it returns the correct value if $eV<0$, but it does nothing to enforce that. Note that the initial integral has a positive integrand over positively-ordered intervals, which means that the value of the integral cannot be negative.
              $endgroup$
              – E.P.
              Mar 14 at 11:16















            0












            $begingroup$

            E.P., thank you for your answer. Integrating out the first variableis the most crucial step. When I was solving this problem, I first tried to reduce the multivariable Dirac delta to a single-variable one. At the end, it became very difficult to analyze that under which circumstance does the Dirac delta become nonzero.



            In the following, I start with the last equation and finish the rest of the calcuations:



            beginequation
            I = int^infty_eV/2depsilon_1 int^-eV/2_epsilon_1depsilon_2(epsilon_2-epsilon_1)
            endequation

            Here, $epsilon_1$ becomes the lower bound of $epsilon_2$, indicating that $epsilon_1 leq -eV/2$. Thus, we should change the range of the integration over $epsilon_1$ above accordingly, i.e.
            beginequation
            I = int^-eV/2_eV/2depsilon_1 int^-eV/2_epsilon_1depsilon_2(epsilon_2-epsilon_1)=int^-eV/2_eV/2depsilon_1 left[frac(eV)^28+fracepsilon_1^22 + fraceV2epsilon_1right]=-frac(eV)^36.quad Q.E.D.
            endequation

            Thanks!






            share|cite|improve this answer








            New contributor




            Chang is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
            Check out our Code of Conduct.






            $endgroup$












            • $begingroup$
              No, that's still not right - it returns the correct value if $eV<0$, but it does nothing to enforce that. Note that the initial integral has a positive integrand over positively-ordered intervals, which means that the value of the integral cannot be negative.
              $endgroup$
              – E.P.
              Mar 14 at 11:16













            0












            0








            0





            $begingroup$

            E.P., thank you for your answer. Integrating out the first variableis the most crucial step. When I was solving this problem, I first tried to reduce the multivariable Dirac delta to a single-variable one. At the end, it became very difficult to analyze that under which circumstance does the Dirac delta become nonzero.



            In the following, I start with the last equation and finish the rest of the calcuations:



            beginequation
            I = int^infty_eV/2depsilon_1 int^-eV/2_epsilon_1depsilon_2(epsilon_2-epsilon_1)
            endequation

            Here, $epsilon_1$ becomes the lower bound of $epsilon_2$, indicating that $epsilon_1 leq -eV/2$. Thus, we should change the range of the integration over $epsilon_1$ above accordingly, i.e.
            beginequation
            I = int^-eV/2_eV/2depsilon_1 int^-eV/2_epsilon_1depsilon_2(epsilon_2-epsilon_1)=int^-eV/2_eV/2depsilon_1 left[frac(eV)^28+fracepsilon_1^22 + fraceV2epsilon_1right]=-frac(eV)^36.quad Q.E.D.
            endequation

            Thanks!






            share|cite|improve this answer








            New contributor




            Chang is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
            Check out our Code of Conduct.






            $endgroup$



            E.P., thank you for your answer. Integrating out the first variableis the most crucial step. When I was solving this problem, I first tried to reduce the multivariable Dirac delta to a single-variable one. At the end, it became very difficult to analyze that under which circumstance does the Dirac delta become nonzero.



            In the following, I start with the last equation and finish the rest of the calcuations:



            beginequation
            I = int^infty_eV/2depsilon_1 int^-eV/2_epsilon_1depsilon_2(epsilon_2-epsilon_1)
            endequation

            Here, $epsilon_1$ becomes the lower bound of $epsilon_2$, indicating that $epsilon_1 leq -eV/2$. Thus, we should change the range of the integration over $epsilon_1$ above accordingly, i.e.
            beginequation
            I = int^-eV/2_eV/2depsilon_1 int^-eV/2_epsilon_1depsilon_2(epsilon_2-epsilon_1)=int^-eV/2_eV/2depsilon_1 left[frac(eV)^28+fracepsilon_1^22 + fraceV2epsilon_1right]=-frac(eV)^36.quad Q.E.D.
            endequation

            Thanks!







            share|cite|improve this answer








            New contributor




            Chang is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
            Check out our Code of Conduct.









            share|cite|improve this answer



            share|cite|improve this answer






            New contributor




            Chang is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
            Check out our Code of Conduct.









            answered Mar 14 at 6:16









            ChangChang

            61




            61




            New contributor




            Chang is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
            Check out our Code of Conduct.





            New contributor





            Chang is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
            Check out our Code of Conduct.






            Chang is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
            Check out our Code of Conduct.











            • $begingroup$
              No, that's still not right - it returns the correct value if $eV<0$, but it does nothing to enforce that. Note that the initial integral has a positive integrand over positively-ordered intervals, which means that the value of the integral cannot be negative.
              $endgroup$
              – E.P.
              Mar 14 at 11:16
















            • $begingroup$
              No, that's still not right - it returns the correct value if $eV<0$, but it does nothing to enforce that. Note that the initial integral has a positive integrand over positively-ordered intervals, which means that the value of the integral cannot be negative.
              $endgroup$
              – E.P.
              Mar 14 at 11:16















            $begingroup$
            No, that's still not right - it returns the correct value if $eV<0$, but it does nothing to enforce that. Note that the initial integral has a positive integrand over positively-ordered intervals, which means that the value of the integral cannot be negative.
            $endgroup$
            – E.P.
            Mar 14 at 11:16




            $begingroup$
            No, that's still not right - it returns the correct value if $eV<0$, but it does nothing to enforce that. Note that the initial integral has a positive integrand over positively-ordered intervals, which means that the value of the integral cannot be negative.
            $endgroup$
            – E.P.
            Mar 14 at 11:16

















            draft saved

            draft discarded
















































            Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid


            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

            Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function ()
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3146964%2fthe-integral-of-a-multivariable-dirac-delta-function%23new-answer', 'question_page');

            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            Popular posts from this blog

            Solar Wings Breeze Design and development Specifications (Breeze) References Navigation menu1368-485X"Hang glider: Breeze (Solar Wings)"e

            Kathakali Contents Etymology and nomenclature History Repertoire Songs and musical instruments Traditional plays Styles: Sampradayam Training centers and awards Relationship to other dance forms See also Notes References External links Navigation menueThe Illustrated Encyclopedia of Hinduism: A-MSouth Asian Folklore: An EncyclopediaRoutledge International Encyclopedia of Women: Global Women's Issues and KnowledgeKathakali Dance-drama: Where Gods and Demons Come to PlayKathakali Dance-drama: Where Gods and Demons Come to PlayKathakali Dance-drama: Where Gods and Demons Come to Play10.1353/atj.2005.0004The Illustrated Encyclopedia of Hinduism: A-MEncyclopedia of HinduismKathakali Dance-drama: Where Gods and Demons Come to PlaySonic Liturgy: Ritual and Music in Hindu Tradition"The Mirror of Gesture"Kathakali Dance-drama: Where Gods and Demons Come to Play"Kathakali"Indian Theatre: Traditions of PerformanceIndian Theatre: Traditions of PerformanceIndian Theatre: Traditions of PerformanceIndian Theatre: Traditions of PerformanceMedieval Indian Literature: An AnthologyThe Oxford Companion to Indian TheatreSouth Asian Folklore: An Encyclopedia : Afghanistan, Bangladesh, India, Nepal, Pakistan, Sri LankaThe Rise of Performance Studies: Rethinking Richard Schechner's Broad SpectrumIndian Theatre: Traditions of PerformanceModern Asian Theatre and Performance 1900-2000Critical Theory and PerformanceBetween Theater and AnthropologyKathakali603847011Indian Theatre: Traditions of PerformanceIndian Theatre: Traditions of PerformanceIndian Theatre: Traditions of PerformanceBetween Theater and AnthropologyBetween Theater and AnthropologyNambeesan Smaraka AwardsArchivedThe Cambridge Guide to TheatreRoutledge International Encyclopedia of Women: Global Women's Issues and KnowledgeThe Garland Encyclopedia of World Music: South Asia : the Indian subcontinentThe Ethos of Noh: Actors and Their Art10.2307/1145740By Means of Performance: Intercultural Studies of Theatre and Ritual10.1017/s204912550000100xReconceiving the Renaissance: A Critical ReaderPerformance TheoryListening to Theatre: The Aural Dimension of Beijing Opera10.2307/1146013Kathakali: The Art of the Non-WorldlyOn KathakaliKathakali, the dance theatreThe Kathakali Complex: Performance & StructureKathakali Dance-Drama: Where Gods and Demons Come to Play10.1093/obo/9780195399318-0071Drama and Ritual of Early Hinduism"In the Shadow of Hollywood Orientalism: Authentic East Indian Dancing"10.1080/08949460490274013Sanskrit Play Production in Ancient IndiaIndian Music: History and StructureBharata, the Nāṭyaśāstra233639306Table of Contents2238067286469807Dance In Indian Painting10.2307/32047833204783Kathakali Dance-Theatre: A Visual Narrative of Sacred Indian MimeIndian Classical Dance: The Renaissance and BeyondKathakali: an indigenous art-form of Keralaeee

            Method to test if a number is a perfect power? Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara Planned maintenance scheduled April 23, 2019 at 00:00UTC (8:00pm US/Eastern)Detecting perfect squares faster than by extracting square rooteffective way to get the integer sequence A181392 from oeisA rarely mentioned fact about perfect powersHow many numbers such $n$ are there that $n<100,lfloorsqrtn rfloor mid n$Check perfect squareness by modulo division against multiple basesFor what pair of integers $(a,b)$ is $3^a + 7^b$ a perfect square.Do there exist any positive integers $n$ such that $lfloore^nrfloor$ is a perfect power? What is the probability that one exists?finding perfect power factors of an integerProve that the sequence contains a perfect square for any natural number $m $ in the domain of $f$ .Counting Perfect Powers