Find all polynomials with coefficients from set $-1,1$ and which have all their roots real.Polynomials with integer coefficients, with value close to $0$, in the interval $[-1,1]$Bounding the roots of the sum of two monic polynomials with real coefficients.Proving that polynomials with rational coefficients have integer rootsReal roots of a polynomial of real co-efficients , with the co-efficients of $x^2 , x$ and the constant term all $1$Polynomials and their (real) rootsA polynomial with real coefficients expressible as sum of squares of two polynomials will have not all roots as real.Roots of polynomials with bounded integer coefficientsContinuity in roots of polynomials as functions of Real Coefficients for multidimensional polynomialsConvex combination of monic polynomials of real coefficients with roots lying on the left half planeCan we prove that all roots of those polynomials are real negative?

Why do IPv6 unique local addresses have to have a /48 prefix?

Could the E-bike drivetrain wear down till needing replacement after 400 km?

Why did the HMS Bounty go back to a time when whales are already rare?

Does the Mind Blank spell prevent the target from being frightened?

A social experiment. What is the worst that can happen?

Can somebody explain Brexit in a few child-proof sentences?

Why did the EU agree to delay the Brexit deadline?

Can we have a perfect cadence in a minor key?

Translation of Scottish 16th century church stained glass

How to align and center standalone amsmath equations?

Proof of Lemma: Every nonzero integer can be written as a product of primes

How much character growth crosses the line into breaking the character

Should I stop contributing to retirement accounts?

Engineer refusing to file/disclose patents

Did US corporations pay demonstrators in the German demonstrations against article 13?

Visiting the UK as unmarried couple

Open a doc from terminal, but not by its name

Is camera lens focus an exact point or a range?

What's the difference between 違法 and 不法?

How do I repair my stair bannister?

Is it improper etiquette to ask your opponent what his/her rating is before the game?

Is it possible to have a strip of cold climate in the middle of a planet?

A Permanent Norse Presence in America

What (else) happened July 1st 1858 in London?



Find all polynomials with coefficients from set $-1,1$ and which have all their roots real.


Polynomials with integer coefficients, with value close to $0$, in the interval $[-1,1]$Bounding the roots of the sum of two monic polynomials with real coefficients.Proving that polynomials with rational coefficients have integer rootsReal roots of a polynomial of real co-efficients , with the co-efficients of $x^2 , x$ and the constant term all $1$Polynomials and their (real) rootsA polynomial with real coefficients expressible as sum of squares of two polynomials will have not all roots as real.Roots of polynomials with bounded integer coefficientsContinuity in roots of polynomials as functions of Real Coefficients for multidimensional polynomialsConvex combination of monic polynomials of real coefficients with roots lying on the left half planeCan we prove that all roots of those polynomials are real negative?













1












$begingroup$



Find all polynomials with coefficients from
set $-1,1$ and which have all their roots real.




What I have tried:



Assume polynomial is $a_nx^n+a_n-1x^n-1+a_n-2x^n-2+cdots +a_0=0$ and $a_iin -1,1$ for $i=0,1,2,3,4,cdots ,n$. Let its roots be $x=r_i$ for $i=1,2,3,cdots n$. Then



$beginalignedsum r_i=-fraca_n-1a_n=pm 1\\
mathopsum_i<jr_ir_j=+fraca_n-2a_n=pm 1\\
mathopsum_i<j<kr_ir_jr_k=+fraca_n-2a_n=pm 1\\
prod r_i=(-1)^nfraca_0a_nendaligned$



How do I solve it?










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$











  • $begingroup$
    Are you actually required to use that form? It'd be a lot easier - to the point of triviality - to use the roots form $aproduct_k(x-x_k)$
    $endgroup$
    – Dan Uznanski
    Mar 16 at 9:00










  • $begingroup$
    Note if $a_n = -1$, you can multiply the equation by $-1$ and still get the same roots. Thus, WLOG, you can set $a_n = 1$, with this at least simplifying your equations slightly. Also, your triple product formula should have $-fraca_n-3a_n$ in the middle part.
    $endgroup$
    – John Omielan
    Mar 16 at 9:09







  • 2




    $begingroup$
    Have you tried solving the problems explicitly for low degrees and looking for patterns that you can try to prove?
    $endgroup$
    – Henning Makholm
    Mar 16 at 9:48










  • $begingroup$
    I haven't solved it, but for $n ge 2$, I have determined so far that, if you let $a_n = 1$, then $a_n-2 = -1$, plus that $sum r_i^2 = 3$. Are you able to see why this is so?
    $endgroup$
    – John Omielan
    Mar 16 at 10:30
















1












$begingroup$



Find all polynomials with coefficients from
set $-1,1$ and which have all their roots real.




What I have tried:



Assume polynomial is $a_nx^n+a_n-1x^n-1+a_n-2x^n-2+cdots +a_0=0$ and $a_iin -1,1$ for $i=0,1,2,3,4,cdots ,n$. Let its roots be $x=r_i$ for $i=1,2,3,cdots n$. Then



$beginalignedsum r_i=-fraca_n-1a_n=pm 1\\
mathopsum_i<jr_ir_j=+fraca_n-2a_n=pm 1\\
mathopsum_i<j<kr_ir_jr_k=+fraca_n-2a_n=pm 1\\
prod r_i=(-1)^nfraca_0a_nendaligned$



How do I solve it?










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$











  • $begingroup$
    Are you actually required to use that form? It'd be a lot easier - to the point of triviality - to use the roots form $aproduct_k(x-x_k)$
    $endgroup$
    – Dan Uznanski
    Mar 16 at 9:00










  • $begingroup$
    Note if $a_n = -1$, you can multiply the equation by $-1$ and still get the same roots. Thus, WLOG, you can set $a_n = 1$, with this at least simplifying your equations slightly. Also, your triple product formula should have $-fraca_n-3a_n$ in the middle part.
    $endgroup$
    – John Omielan
    Mar 16 at 9:09







  • 2




    $begingroup$
    Have you tried solving the problems explicitly for low degrees and looking for patterns that you can try to prove?
    $endgroup$
    – Henning Makholm
    Mar 16 at 9:48










  • $begingroup$
    I haven't solved it, but for $n ge 2$, I have determined so far that, if you let $a_n = 1$, then $a_n-2 = -1$, plus that $sum r_i^2 = 3$. Are you able to see why this is so?
    $endgroup$
    – John Omielan
    Mar 16 at 10:30














1












1








1


1



$begingroup$



Find all polynomials with coefficients from
set $-1,1$ and which have all their roots real.




What I have tried:



Assume polynomial is $a_nx^n+a_n-1x^n-1+a_n-2x^n-2+cdots +a_0=0$ and $a_iin -1,1$ for $i=0,1,2,3,4,cdots ,n$. Let its roots be $x=r_i$ for $i=1,2,3,cdots n$. Then



$beginalignedsum r_i=-fraca_n-1a_n=pm 1\\
mathopsum_i<jr_ir_j=+fraca_n-2a_n=pm 1\\
mathopsum_i<j<kr_ir_jr_k=+fraca_n-2a_n=pm 1\\
prod r_i=(-1)^nfraca_0a_nendaligned$



How do I solve it?










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$





Find all polynomials with coefficients from
set $-1,1$ and which have all their roots real.




What I have tried:



Assume polynomial is $a_nx^n+a_n-1x^n-1+a_n-2x^n-2+cdots +a_0=0$ and $a_iin -1,1$ for $i=0,1,2,3,4,cdots ,n$. Let its roots be $x=r_i$ for $i=1,2,3,cdots n$. Then



$beginalignedsum r_i=-fraca_n-1a_n=pm 1\\
mathopsum_i<jr_ir_j=+fraca_n-2a_n=pm 1\\
mathopsum_i<j<kr_ir_jr_k=+fraca_n-2a_n=pm 1\\
prod r_i=(-1)^nfraca_0a_nendaligned$



How do I solve it?







polynomials roots






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited Mar 16 at 8:55









TheSimpliFire

12.9k62462




12.9k62462










asked Mar 16 at 8:47









jackyjacky

1,264816




1,264816











  • $begingroup$
    Are you actually required to use that form? It'd be a lot easier - to the point of triviality - to use the roots form $aproduct_k(x-x_k)$
    $endgroup$
    – Dan Uznanski
    Mar 16 at 9:00










  • $begingroup$
    Note if $a_n = -1$, you can multiply the equation by $-1$ and still get the same roots. Thus, WLOG, you can set $a_n = 1$, with this at least simplifying your equations slightly. Also, your triple product formula should have $-fraca_n-3a_n$ in the middle part.
    $endgroup$
    – John Omielan
    Mar 16 at 9:09







  • 2




    $begingroup$
    Have you tried solving the problems explicitly for low degrees and looking for patterns that you can try to prove?
    $endgroup$
    – Henning Makholm
    Mar 16 at 9:48










  • $begingroup$
    I haven't solved it, but for $n ge 2$, I have determined so far that, if you let $a_n = 1$, then $a_n-2 = -1$, plus that $sum r_i^2 = 3$. Are you able to see why this is so?
    $endgroup$
    – John Omielan
    Mar 16 at 10:30

















  • $begingroup$
    Are you actually required to use that form? It'd be a lot easier - to the point of triviality - to use the roots form $aproduct_k(x-x_k)$
    $endgroup$
    – Dan Uznanski
    Mar 16 at 9:00










  • $begingroup$
    Note if $a_n = -1$, you can multiply the equation by $-1$ and still get the same roots. Thus, WLOG, you can set $a_n = 1$, with this at least simplifying your equations slightly. Also, your triple product formula should have $-fraca_n-3a_n$ in the middle part.
    $endgroup$
    – John Omielan
    Mar 16 at 9:09







  • 2




    $begingroup$
    Have you tried solving the problems explicitly for low degrees and looking for patterns that you can try to prove?
    $endgroup$
    – Henning Makholm
    Mar 16 at 9:48










  • $begingroup$
    I haven't solved it, but for $n ge 2$, I have determined so far that, if you let $a_n = 1$, then $a_n-2 = -1$, plus that $sum r_i^2 = 3$. Are you able to see why this is so?
    $endgroup$
    – John Omielan
    Mar 16 at 10:30
















$begingroup$
Are you actually required to use that form? It'd be a lot easier - to the point of triviality - to use the roots form $aproduct_k(x-x_k)$
$endgroup$
– Dan Uznanski
Mar 16 at 9:00




$begingroup$
Are you actually required to use that form? It'd be a lot easier - to the point of triviality - to use the roots form $aproduct_k(x-x_k)$
$endgroup$
– Dan Uznanski
Mar 16 at 9:00












$begingroup$
Note if $a_n = -1$, you can multiply the equation by $-1$ and still get the same roots. Thus, WLOG, you can set $a_n = 1$, with this at least simplifying your equations slightly. Also, your triple product formula should have $-fraca_n-3a_n$ in the middle part.
$endgroup$
– John Omielan
Mar 16 at 9:09





$begingroup$
Note if $a_n = -1$, you can multiply the equation by $-1$ and still get the same roots. Thus, WLOG, you can set $a_n = 1$, with this at least simplifying your equations slightly. Also, your triple product formula should have $-fraca_n-3a_n$ in the middle part.
$endgroup$
– John Omielan
Mar 16 at 9:09





2




2




$begingroup$
Have you tried solving the problems explicitly for low degrees and looking for patterns that you can try to prove?
$endgroup$
– Henning Makholm
Mar 16 at 9:48




$begingroup$
Have you tried solving the problems explicitly for low degrees and looking for patterns that you can try to prove?
$endgroup$
– Henning Makholm
Mar 16 at 9:48












$begingroup$
I haven't solved it, but for $n ge 2$, I have determined so far that, if you let $a_n = 1$, then $a_n-2 = -1$, plus that $sum r_i^2 = 3$. Are you able to see why this is so?
$endgroup$
– John Omielan
Mar 16 at 10:30





$begingroup$
I haven't solved it, but for $n ge 2$, I have determined so far that, if you let $a_n = 1$, then $a_n-2 = -1$, plus that $sum r_i^2 = 3$. Are you able to see why this is so?
$endgroup$
– John Omielan
Mar 16 at 10:30











1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















3












$begingroup$

WLOG, let $a_n = 1$. Also, let $r_1,ldots,r_n$ be the roots of the polynomial.



As you noted, $displaystylesum_k = 1^nr_k = -a_n-1$, $displaystylesum_1 le k < ell le nr_kr_ell = a_n-2$, and $displaystyleprod_k = 1^nr_k = (-1)^na_0$. Hence,



$$displaystylesum_k = 1^nr_k^2 = left(sum_k = 1^nr_kright)^2-2left(sum_1 le k < ell le nr_kr_ellright) = a_n-1^2-2a_n-2 = 1-2a_n-2 = begincases3 & textif a_n-2 = -1 \ -1 & textif a_n-2 = 1 endcases.$$



Since all the roots are real, $displaystylesum_k = 1^nr_k^2 ge 0$. Hence, we must have $a_n-2 = -1$ and thus $displaystylesum_k = 1^nr_k^2 = 3$.



Trivially, we then have $displaystylesum_k = 1^n|r_k|^2 = sum_k = 1^nr_k^2= 3$, as well as $displaystyleprod_k = 1^n|r_k| = left|prod_k = 1^nr_kright| = left|(-1)^na_0right| = 1$.



So by the RMS-GM inequality, we have $$displaystyle 1 = left(prod_k = 1^n|r_k|right)^1/n le left(dfrac1nsum_k = 1^n|r_k|^2right)^1/2 = sqrtdfrac3n.$$



Therefore, we must have $n le 3$. It is easy to check that the only solutions are:



$x-1$, $x+1$, $x^2-x-1$, $x^2+x-1$, $x^3-x^2-x+1$, $x^3+x^2-x-1$, and their negatives.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$












    Your Answer





    StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
    return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
    StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
    StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
    );
    );
    , "mathjax-editing");

    StackExchange.ready(function()
    var channelOptions =
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "69"
    ;
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
    createEditor();
    );

    else
    createEditor();

    );

    function createEditor()
    StackExchange.prepareEditor(
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
    convertImagesToLinks: true,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: 10,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader:
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    ,
    noCode: true, onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    );



    );













    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function ()
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3150209%2ffind-all-polynomials-with-coefficients-from-set-1-1-and-which-have-all-th%23new-answer', 'question_page');

    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes








    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    3












    $begingroup$

    WLOG, let $a_n = 1$. Also, let $r_1,ldots,r_n$ be the roots of the polynomial.



    As you noted, $displaystylesum_k = 1^nr_k = -a_n-1$, $displaystylesum_1 le k < ell le nr_kr_ell = a_n-2$, and $displaystyleprod_k = 1^nr_k = (-1)^na_0$. Hence,



    $$displaystylesum_k = 1^nr_k^2 = left(sum_k = 1^nr_kright)^2-2left(sum_1 le k < ell le nr_kr_ellright) = a_n-1^2-2a_n-2 = 1-2a_n-2 = begincases3 & textif a_n-2 = -1 \ -1 & textif a_n-2 = 1 endcases.$$



    Since all the roots are real, $displaystylesum_k = 1^nr_k^2 ge 0$. Hence, we must have $a_n-2 = -1$ and thus $displaystylesum_k = 1^nr_k^2 = 3$.



    Trivially, we then have $displaystylesum_k = 1^n|r_k|^2 = sum_k = 1^nr_k^2= 3$, as well as $displaystyleprod_k = 1^n|r_k| = left|prod_k = 1^nr_kright| = left|(-1)^na_0right| = 1$.



    So by the RMS-GM inequality, we have $$displaystyle 1 = left(prod_k = 1^n|r_k|right)^1/n le left(dfrac1nsum_k = 1^n|r_k|^2right)^1/2 = sqrtdfrac3n.$$



    Therefore, we must have $n le 3$. It is easy to check that the only solutions are:



    $x-1$, $x+1$, $x^2-x-1$, $x^2+x-1$, $x^3-x^2-x+1$, $x^3+x^2-x-1$, and their negatives.






    share|cite|improve this answer









    $endgroup$

















      3












      $begingroup$

      WLOG, let $a_n = 1$. Also, let $r_1,ldots,r_n$ be the roots of the polynomial.



      As you noted, $displaystylesum_k = 1^nr_k = -a_n-1$, $displaystylesum_1 le k < ell le nr_kr_ell = a_n-2$, and $displaystyleprod_k = 1^nr_k = (-1)^na_0$. Hence,



      $$displaystylesum_k = 1^nr_k^2 = left(sum_k = 1^nr_kright)^2-2left(sum_1 le k < ell le nr_kr_ellright) = a_n-1^2-2a_n-2 = 1-2a_n-2 = begincases3 & textif a_n-2 = -1 \ -1 & textif a_n-2 = 1 endcases.$$



      Since all the roots are real, $displaystylesum_k = 1^nr_k^2 ge 0$. Hence, we must have $a_n-2 = -1$ and thus $displaystylesum_k = 1^nr_k^2 = 3$.



      Trivially, we then have $displaystylesum_k = 1^n|r_k|^2 = sum_k = 1^nr_k^2= 3$, as well as $displaystyleprod_k = 1^n|r_k| = left|prod_k = 1^nr_kright| = left|(-1)^na_0right| = 1$.



      So by the RMS-GM inequality, we have $$displaystyle 1 = left(prod_k = 1^n|r_k|right)^1/n le left(dfrac1nsum_k = 1^n|r_k|^2right)^1/2 = sqrtdfrac3n.$$



      Therefore, we must have $n le 3$. It is easy to check that the only solutions are:



      $x-1$, $x+1$, $x^2-x-1$, $x^2+x-1$, $x^3-x^2-x+1$, $x^3+x^2-x-1$, and their negatives.






      share|cite|improve this answer









      $endgroup$















        3












        3








        3





        $begingroup$

        WLOG, let $a_n = 1$. Also, let $r_1,ldots,r_n$ be the roots of the polynomial.



        As you noted, $displaystylesum_k = 1^nr_k = -a_n-1$, $displaystylesum_1 le k < ell le nr_kr_ell = a_n-2$, and $displaystyleprod_k = 1^nr_k = (-1)^na_0$. Hence,



        $$displaystylesum_k = 1^nr_k^2 = left(sum_k = 1^nr_kright)^2-2left(sum_1 le k < ell le nr_kr_ellright) = a_n-1^2-2a_n-2 = 1-2a_n-2 = begincases3 & textif a_n-2 = -1 \ -1 & textif a_n-2 = 1 endcases.$$



        Since all the roots are real, $displaystylesum_k = 1^nr_k^2 ge 0$. Hence, we must have $a_n-2 = -1$ and thus $displaystylesum_k = 1^nr_k^2 = 3$.



        Trivially, we then have $displaystylesum_k = 1^n|r_k|^2 = sum_k = 1^nr_k^2= 3$, as well as $displaystyleprod_k = 1^n|r_k| = left|prod_k = 1^nr_kright| = left|(-1)^na_0right| = 1$.



        So by the RMS-GM inequality, we have $$displaystyle 1 = left(prod_k = 1^n|r_k|right)^1/n le left(dfrac1nsum_k = 1^n|r_k|^2right)^1/2 = sqrtdfrac3n.$$



        Therefore, we must have $n le 3$. It is easy to check that the only solutions are:



        $x-1$, $x+1$, $x^2-x-1$, $x^2+x-1$, $x^3-x^2-x+1$, $x^3+x^2-x-1$, and their negatives.






        share|cite|improve this answer









        $endgroup$



        WLOG, let $a_n = 1$. Also, let $r_1,ldots,r_n$ be the roots of the polynomial.



        As you noted, $displaystylesum_k = 1^nr_k = -a_n-1$, $displaystylesum_1 le k < ell le nr_kr_ell = a_n-2$, and $displaystyleprod_k = 1^nr_k = (-1)^na_0$. Hence,



        $$displaystylesum_k = 1^nr_k^2 = left(sum_k = 1^nr_kright)^2-2left(sum_1 le k < ell le nr_kr_ellright) = a_n-1^2-2a_n-2 = 1-2a_n-2 = begincases3 & textif a_n-2 = -1 \ -1 & textif a_n-2 = 1 endcases.$$



        Since all the roots are real, $displaystylesum_k = 1^nr_k^2 ge 0$. Hence, we must have $a_n-2 = -1$ and thus $displaystylesum_k = 1^nr_k^2 = 3$.



        Trivially, we then have $displaystylesum_k = 1^n|r_k|^2 = sum_k = 1^nr_k^2= 3$, as well as $displaystyleprod_k = 1^n|r_k| = left|prod_k = 1^nr_kright| = left|(-1)^na_0right| = 1$.



        So by the RMS-GM inequality, we have $$displaystyle 1 = left(prod_k = 1^n|r_k|right)^1/n le left(dfrac1nsum_k = 1^n|r_k|^2right)^1/2 = sqrtdfrac3n.$$



        Therefore, we must have $n le 3$. It is easy to check that the only solutions are:



        $x-1$, $x+1$, $x^2-x-1$, $x^2+x-1$, $x^3-x^2-x+1$, $x^3+x^2-x-1$, and their negatives.







        share|cite|improve this answer












        share|cite|improve this answer



        share|cite|improve this answer










        answered Mar 17 at 9:27









        JimmyK4542JimmyK4542

        41.3k245107




        41.3k245107



























            draft saved

            draft discarded
















































            Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid


            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

            Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function ()
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3150209%2ffind-all-polynomials-with-coefficients-from-set-1-1-and-which-have-all-th%23new-answer', 'question_page');

            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            Popular posts from this blog

            Moe incest case Sentencing See also References Navigation menu"'Australian Josef Fritzl' fathered four children by daughter""Small town recoils in horror at 'Australian Fritzl' incest case""Victorian rape allegations echo Fritzl case - Just In (Australian Broadcasting Corporation)""Incest father jailed for 22 years""'Australian Fritzl' sentenced to 22 years in prison for abusing daughter for three decades""RSJ v The Queen"

            Who is our nearest planetary neighbor, on average?Santa Claus flies to the South PoleSeven Spheres of Unequal Mass, a weighing problem with a twistDescribe a large integerFast Mental Calculation of $7.5^7$Math in Space (without the help of celebrities)Find the value of $bigstar$: Puzzle 8 - InequalityWho drinks beer while running anyway?A Crucial DeliveryRanking And AverageHow long will my money last at roulette?

            Daza language Contents Vocabulary Phonology References External links Navigation menudaza1242Daza"Dazaga"eeee178086576