In which rings does this multiplicative analogue of Bézout's theorem hold?International Zhautykov Olympiad 2019 problem 6Dedekind domain with a finite number of prime ideals is principalClassifying Unital Commutative Rings of Order $p^2$$mathbbZ[X]$ is noetherianProve that if R and S are nonzero rings then $Rtimes S$ is never a field.Consequence of Chinese Remainder TheoremConditions for $(I+K)cap (J+K) = Icap J +K $ to hold for ideals of ring $R$Does the Dorroh Extension Theorem simplify ring theory to the study of rings with identity?Chinese remainder theorem for rings applied to Z/nZDo both versions (invariant and primary) of the Fundamental Theorem for Finitely Generated Abelian Groups hold at the same time?Analogue for Group Rings for multiplicative sets
A social experiment. What is the worst that can happen?
Does having a TSA Pre-Check member in your flight reservation increase the chances that everyone gets Pre-Check?
Greatest common substring
Is possible to search in vim history?
Is camera lens focus an exact point or a range?
Is XSS in canonical link possible?
On a tidally locked planet, would time be quantized?
Can someone explain how this makes sense electrically?
How much character growth crosses the line into breaking the character
Freedom of speech and where it applies
Why is Arduino resetting while driving motors?
How to align and center standalone amsmath equations?
Should I install hardwood flooring or cabinets first?
Has Darkwing Duck ever met Scrooge McDuck?
Two-sided logarithm inequality
Melting point of aspirin, contradicting sources
Create all possible words using a set or letters
Flux received by a negative charge
What's the difference between 違法 and 不法?
Can I use my Chinese passport to enter China after I acquired another citizenship?
How must one send away the mother bird?
Engineer refusing to file/disclose patents
How do I implement a file system driver driver in Linux?
What major Native American tribes were around Santa Fe during the late 1850s?
In which rings does this multiplicative analogue of Bézout's theorem hold?
International Zhautykov Olympiad 2019 problem 6Dedekind domain with a finite number of prime ideals is principalClassifying Unital Commutative Rings of Order $p^2$$mathbbZ[X]$ is noetherianProve that if R and S are nonzero rings then $Rtimes S$ is never a field.Consequence of Chinese Remainder TheoremConditions for $(I+K)cap (J+K) = Icap J +K $ to hold for ideals of ring $R$Does the Dorroh Extension Theorem simplify ring theory to the study of rings with identity?Chinese remainder theorem for rings applied to Z/nZDo both versions (invariant and primary) of the Fundamental Theorem for Finitely Generated Abelian Groups hold at the same time?Analogue for Group Rings for multiplicative sets
$begingroup$
When I was thinking about this question: International Zhautykov Olympiad 2019 problem 6 I learned that, when $0 < a,b$ are integers that divide $n >0$ and $d$ is their $gcd$, then if for a divisor $m mid n$, $K_m$ denotes the kernel of the reduction map $(mathbb Z/n)^times to (mathbb Z/m)^times$, we have $K_aK_b = K_d$.
Note that Bézout's theorem (mod $n$) says precisely that the same is true for the reduction maps $(mathbb Z/n, +)to (mathbb Z/m, +)$.
The proof I have for the multiplicative version uses the Chinese remainder theorem: do the case where $n$ is a prime power first, then glue the solutions for a given element of $K_d$ using the CRT. Slightly more generally, it shows that any PID $R$ satisfies the following:
If $0 neq N subset A, B$ are ideals of $R$, then $$1+(A+B) = (1+A)(1+B) + N$$
I'm a bit dissatisfied with the proof for PID's, and would like to understand the equality more conceptually. So my question is:
Which other commutative rings $R$ satisfy this property? Is there a characterization?
ring-theory commutative-algebra
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
When I was thinking about this question: International Zhautykov Olympiad 2019 problem 6 I learned that, when $0 < a,b$ are integers that divide $n >0$ and $d$ is their $gcd$, then if for a divisor $m mid n$, $K_m$ denotes the kernel of the reduction map $(mathbb Z/n)^times to (mathbb Z/m)^times$, we have $K_aK_b = K_d$.
Note that Bézout's theorem (mod $n$) says precisely that the same is true for the reduction maps $(mathbb Z/n, +)to (mathbb Z/m, +)$.
The proof I have for the multiplicative version uses the Chinese remainder theorem: do the case where $n$ is a prime power first, then glue the solutions for a given element of $K_d$ using the CRT. Slightly more generally, it shows that any PID $R$ satisfies the following:
If $0 neq N subset A, B$ are ideals of $R$, then $$1+(A+B) = (1+A)(1+B) + N$$
I'm a bit dissatisfied with the proof for PID's, and would like to understand the equality more conceptually. So my question is:
Which other commutative rings $R$ satisfy this property? Is there a characterization?
ring-theory commutative-algebra
$endgroup$
1
$begingroup$
Is the left set $1+a+bmid ain A, bin B$ and the right set is $(1+a)(1+b)+nmid a,in A, bin B,nin N$? I ask because i'm not sure how you meant to define the product $(1+A)(1+B)$.
$endgroup$
– rschwieb
Mar 17 at 0:42
$begingroup$
@rschwieb Yes. I denote $a * B = a*b : b in B $ and $A*B = a*b : a in A, b in B $ for an operation $*$ - which indeed kills distributivity.
$endgroup$
– rabota
Mar 17 at 10:20
add a comment |
$begingroup$
When I was thinking about this question: International Zhautykov Olympiad 2019 problem 6 I learned that, when $0 < a,b$ are integers that divide $n >0$ and $d$ is their $gcd$, then if for a divisor $m mid n$, $K_m$ denotes the kernel of the reduction map $(mathbb Z/n)^times to (mathbb Z/m)^times$, we have $K_aK_b = K_d$.
Note that Bézout's theorem (mod $n$) says precisely that the same is true for the reduction maps $(mathbb Z/n, +)to (mathbb Z/m, +)$.
The proof I have for the multiplicative version uses the Chinese remainder theorem: do the case where $n$ is a prime power first, then glue the solutions for a given element of $K_d$ using the CRT. Slightly more generally, it shows that any PID $R$ satisfies the following:
If $0 neq N subset A, B$ are ideals of $R$, then $$1+(A+B) = (1+A)(1+B) + N$$
I'm a bit dissatisfied with the proof for PID's, and would like to understand the equality more conceptually. So my question is:
Which other commutative rings $R$ satisfy this property? Is there a characterization?
ring-theory commutative-algebra
$endgroup$
When I was thinking about this question: International Zhautykov Olympiad 2019 problem 6 I learned that, when $0 < a,b$ are integers that divide $n >0$ and $d$ is their $gcd$, then if for a divisor $m mid n$, $K_m$ denotes the kernel of the reduction map $(mathbb Z/n)^times to (mathbb Z/m)^times$, we have $K_aK_b = K_d$.
Note that Bézout's theorem (mod $n$) says precisely that the same is true for the reduction maps $(mathbb Z/n, +)to (mathbb Z/m, +)$.
The proof I have for the multiplicative version uses the Chinese remainder theorem: do the case where $n$ is a prime power first, then glue the solutions for a given element of $K_d$ using the CRT. Slightly more generally, it shows that any PID $R$ satisfies the following:
If $0 neq N subset A, B$ are ideals of $R$, then $$1+(A+B) = (1+A)(1+B) + N$$
I'm a bit dissatisfied with the proof for PID's, and would like to understand the equality more conceptually. So my question is:
Which other commutative rings $R$ satisfy this property? Is there a characterization?
ring-theory commutative-algebra
ring-theory commutative-algebra
asked Mar 16 at 9:55
rabotarabota
14.3k32782
14.3k32782
1
$begingroup$
Is the left set $1+a+bmid ain A, bin B$ and the right set is $(1+a)(1+b)+nmid a,in A, bin B,nin N$? I ask because i'm not sure how you meant to define the product $(1+A)(1+B)$.
$endgroup$
– rschwieb
Mar 17 at 0:42
$begingroup$
@rschwieb Yes. I denote $a * B = a*b : b in B $ and $A*B = a*b : a in A, b in B $ for an operation $*$ - which indeed kills distributivity.
$endgroup$
– rabota
Mar 17 at 10:20
add a comment |
1
$begingroup$
Is the left set $1+a+bmid ain A, bin B$ and the right set is $(1+a)(1+b)+nmid a,in A, bin B,nin N$? I ask because i'm not sure how you meant to define the product $(1+A)(1+B)$.
$endgroup$
– rschwieb
Mar 17 at 0:42
$begingroup$
@rschwieb Yes. I denote $a * B = a*b : b in B $ and $A*B = a*b : a in A, b in B $ for an operation $*$ - which indeed kills distributivity.
$endgroup$
– rabota
Mar 17 at 10:20
1
1
$begingroup$
Is the left set $1+a+bmid ain A, bin B$ and the right set is $(1+a)(1+b)+nmid a,in A, bin B,nin N$? I ask because i'm not sure how you meant to define the product $(1+A)(1+B)$.
$endgroup$
– rschwieb
Mar 17 at 0:42
$begingroup$
Is the left set $1+a+bmid ain A, bin B$ and the right set is $(1+a)(1+b)+nmid a,in A, bin B,nin N$? I ask because i'm not sure how you meant to define the product $(1+A)(1+B)$.
$endgroup$
– rschwieb
Mar 17 at 0:42
$begingroup$
@rschwieb Yes. I denote $a * B = a*b : b in B $ and $A*B = a*b : a in A, b in B $ for an operation $*$ - which indeed kills distributivity.
$endgroup$
– rabota
Mar 17 at 10:20
$begingroup$
@rschwieb Yes. I denote $a * B = a*b : b in B $ and $A*B = a*b : a in A, b in B $ for an operation $*$ - which indeed kills distributivity.
$endgroup$
– rabota
Mar 17 at 10:20
add a comment |
0
active
oldest
votes
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
);
);
, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);
else
createEditor();
);
function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);
);
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3150243%2fin-which-rings-does-this-multiplicative-analogue-of-b%25c3%25a9zouts-theorem-hold%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
0
active
oldest
votes
0
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3150243%2fin-which-rings-does-this-multiplicative-analogue-of-b%25c3%25a9zouts-theorem-hold%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
1
$begingroup$
Is the left set $1+a+bmid ain A, bin B$ and the right set is $(1+a)(1+b)+nmid a,in A, bin B,nin N$? I ask because i'm not sure how you meant to define the product $(1+A)(1+B)$.
$endgroup$
– rschwieb
Mar 17 at 0:42
$begingroup$
@rschwieb Yes. I denote $a * B = a*b : b in B $ and $A*B = a*b : a in A, b in B $ for an operation $*$ - which indeed kills distributivity.
$endgroup$
– rabota
Mar 17 at 10:20