Polynomials and Irreducible polynomialsFactoring polynomials of degree $a p^b$ over extension fields.Factoring polynomials of degree 6 over extension fields.Number of irreducible polynomials of degree $3$ over $mathbbF_3$ and $mathbbF_5$.Finite fields formed from irreducible polynomialsA question about the roots of irreducible polynomials.Proving some polynomials are irreducible using Eisenstein's criterionIrreducible Hurwitz Factorization of A Complex PolynomialIf $f$ has $deg(f)$ distince roots whose order are the same, then is $f$ irreducible?Which family of orthogonal polynomials satisfies these conditions?Sturm sequence computation using Chebyshev polynomials
Proving a function is onto where f(x)=|x|.
Greco-Roman egalitarianism
Could solar power be utilized and substitute coal in the 19th Century
Do Legal Documents Require Signing In Standard Pen Colors?
How do you respond to a colleague from another team when they're wrongly expecting that you'll help them?
Has Darkwing Duck ever met Scrooge McDuck?
Do the concepts of IP address and network interface not belong to the same layer?
If a character with the Alert feat rolls a crit fail on their Perception check, are they surprised?
What linear sensor for a keyboard?
Freedom of speech and where it applies
In Star Trek IV, why did the Bounty go back to a time when whales are already rare?
Can I sign legal documents with a smiley face?
My friend sent me a screenshot of a transaction hash, but when I search for it I find divergent data. What happened?
Greatest common substring
Folder comparison
Using a siddur to Daven from in a seforim store
Is possible to search in vim history?
Is camera lens focus an exact point or a range?
Why is Arduino resetting while driving motors?
Melting point of aspirin, contradicting sources
Why do IPv6 unique local addresses have to have a /48 prefix?
What does the Rambam mean when he says that the planets have souls?
Difference between -| and |- in TikZ
Why does Async/Await work properly when the loop is inside the async function and not the other way around?
Polynomials and Irreducible polynomials
Factoring polynomials of degree $a p^b$ over extension fields.Factoring polynomials of degree 6 over extension fields.Number of irreducible polynomials of degree $3$ over $mathbbF_3$ and $mathbbF_5$.Finite fields formed from irreducible polynomialsA question about the roots of irreducible polynomials.Proving some polynomials are irreducible using Eisenstein's criterionIrreducible Hurwitz Factorization of A Complex PolynomialIf $f$ has $deg(f)$ distince roots whose order are the same, then is $f$ irreducible?Which family of orthogonal polynomials satisfies these conditions?Sturm sequence computation using Chebyshev polynomials
$begingroup$
So I'm trying to prove this Proposition:
Every polynomial of degree greater than $0$ is divisible by an irreducible polynomial.
Proof:
Consider a polynomial $P in mathbb R [x]$ of degree $geq 1$
Let $S$ denote the set of non-trivial factors of $P$.
Suppose that $S$ does not contain any irreducible polynomials.
By the well ordering principle let $P_0$ denote the polynomial of least degree in $S$
By our assumption $P_0$ is not irreducible $therefore P_0=P_1P_2$ for some
$P_1,P_2 in mathbb R[x]$
This contradicts the definition of $P_0$ being the polynomial of least degree to be a factor of $P$
Thus we are forced to conclude the polynomial of least degree is irreducible and the claim follows.
$blacksquare$
My main issue is can I use the well ordering principle in this fashion?
thanks
polynomials irreducible-polynomials
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
So I'm trying to prove this Proposition:
Every polynomial of degree greater than $0$ is divisible by an irreducible polynomial.
Proof:
Consider a polynomial $P in mathbb R [x]$ of degree $geq 1$
Let $S$ denote the set of non-trivial factors of $P$.
Suppose that $S$ does not contain any irreducible polynomials.
By the well ordering principle let $P_0$ denote the polynomial of least degree in $S$
By our assumption $P_0$ is not irreducible $therefore P_0=P_1P_2$ for some
$P_1,P_2 in mathbb R[x]$
This contradicts the definition of $P_0$ being the polynomial of least degree to be a factor of $P$
Thus we are forced to conclude the polynomial of least degree is irreducible and the claim follows.
$blacksquare$
My main issue is can I use the well ordering principle in this fashion?
thanks
polynomials irreducible-polynomials
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
$S$ must be the set of monic (non-trivial factors of $P$). With this, you can say that $P_1,P_2$ are monic (and have degree $geq1$)
$endgroup$
– Martín Vacas Vignolo
Dec 26 '18 at 11:26
$begingroup$
Why must the factors be monic?
$endgroup$
– PolynomialC
Dec 26 '18 at 11:28
$begingroup$
No. $S$ is a subset of set of all factors. The key is that in your proof you can not say that $deg P_i geq 1$
$endgroup$
– Martín Vacas Vignolo
Dec 26 '18 at 11:30
$begingroup$
Is this to make sure the set is of finite size and thus bounded below? Cheers for the input.
$endgroup$
– PolynomialC
Dec 26 '18 at 11:33
add a comment |
$begingroup$
So I'm trying to prove this Proposition:
Every polynomial of degree greater than $0$ is divisible by an irreducible polynomial.
Proof:
Consider a polynomial $P in mathbb R [x]$ of degree $geq 1$
Let $S$ denote the set of non-trivial factors of $P$.
Suppose that $S$ does not contain any irreducible polynomials.
By the well ordering principle let $P_0$ denote the polynomial of least degree in $S$
By our assumption $P_0$ is not irreducible $therefore P_0=P_1P_2$ for some
$P_1,P_2 in mathbb R[x]$
This contradicts the definition of $P_0$ being the polynomial of least degree to be a factor of $P$
Thus we are forced to conclude the polynomial of least degree is irreducible and the claim follows.
$blacksquare$
My main issue is can I use the well ordering principle in this fashion?
thanks
polynomials irreducible-polynomials
$endgroup$
So I'm trying to prove this Proposition:
Every polynomial of degree greater than $0$ is divisible by an irreducible polynomial.
Proof:
Consider a polynomial $P in mathbb R [x]$ of degree $geq 1$
Let $S$ denote the set of non-trivial factors of $P$.
Suppose that $S$ does not contain any irreducible polynomials.
By the well ordering principle let $P_0$ denote the polynomial of least degree in $S$
By our assumption $P_0$ is not irreducible $therefore P_0=P_1P_2$ for some
$P_1,P_2 in mathbb R[x]$
This contradicts the definition of $P_0$ being the polynomial of least degree to be a factor of $P$
Thus we are forced to conclude the polynomial of least degree is irreducible and the claim follows.
$blacksquare$
My main issue is can I use the well ordering principle in this fashion?
thanks
polynomials irreducible-polynomials
polynomials irreducible-polynomials
edited Mar 16 at 11:21
Sil
5,31221643
5,31221643
asked Dec 26 '18 at 11:16
PolynomialCPolynomialC
876
876
$begingroup$
$S$ must be the set of monic (non-trivial factors of $P$). With this, you can say that $P_1,P_2$ are monic (and have degree $geq1$)
$endgroup$
– Martín Vacas Vignolo
Dec 26 '18 at 11:26
$begingroup$
Why must the factors be monic?
$endgroup$
– PolynomialC
Dec 26 '18 at 11:28
$begingroup$
No. $S$ is a subset of set of all factors. The key is that in your proof you can not say that $deg P_i geq 1$
$endgroup$
– Martín Vacas Vignolo
Dec 26 '18 at 11:30
$begingroup$
Is this to make sure the set is of finite size and thus bounded below? Cheers for the input.
$endgroup$
– PolynomialC
Dec 26 '18 at 11:33
add a comment |
$begingroup$
$S$ must be the set of monic (non-trivial factors of $P$). With this, you can say that $P_1,P_2$ are monic (and have degree $geq1$)
$endgroup$
– Martín Vacas Vignolo
Dec 26 '18 at 11:26
$begingroup$
Why must the factors be monic?
$endgroup$
– PolynomialC
Dec 26 '18 at 11:28
$begingroup$
No. $S$ is a subset of set of all factors. The key is that in your proof you can not say that $deg P_i geq 1$
$endgroup$
– Martín Vacas Vignolo
Dec 26 '18 at 11:30
$begingroup$
Is this to make sure the set is of finite size and thus bounded below? Cheers for the input.
$endgroup$
– PolynomialC
Dec 26 '18 at 11:33
$begingroup$
$S$ must be the set of monic (non-trivial factors of $P$). With this, you can say that $P_1,P_2$ are monic (and have degree $geq1$)
$endgroup$
– Martín Vacas Vignolo
Dec 26 '18 at 11:26
$begingroup$
$S$ must be the set of monic (non-trivial factors of $P$). With this, you can say that $P_1,P_2$ are monic (and have degree $geq1$)
$endgroup$
– Martín Vacas Vignolo
Dec 26 '18 at 11:26
$begingroup$
Why must the factors be monic?
$endgroup$
– PolynomialC
Dec 26 '18 at 11:28
$begingroup$
Why must the factors be monic?
$endgroup$
– PolynomialC
Dec 26 '18 at 11:28
$begingroup$
No. $S$ is a subset of set of all factors. The key is that in your proof you can not say that $deg P_i geq 1$
$endgroup$
– Martín Vacas Vignolo
Dec 26 '18 at 11:30
$begingroup$
No. $S$ is a subset of set of all factors. The key is that in your proof you can not say that $deg P_i geq 1$
$endgroup$
– Martín Vacas Vignolo
Dec 26 '18 at 11:30
$begingroup$
Is this to make sure the set is of finite size and thus bounded below? Cheers for the input.
$endgroup$
– PolynomialC
Dec 26 '18 at 11:33
$begingroup$
Is this to make sure the set is of finite size and thus bounded below? Cheers for the input.
$endgroup$
– PolynomialC
Dec 26 '18 at 11:33
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
If you want to be precise, you need to apply the well-ordering principle to a non-empty set of $mathbb N$.
For that, define $D = n in mathbb N : textthere is a factor of $P$ of degree $n$ $.
Then $D$ is not empty because $P$ is a factor of $P$.
Let $m = min D$. Then there is a polynomial $Q$ such that $Q$ is a factor of $P$ of degree $m$. The minimality of $m$ implies that $Q$ is irreducible.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
);
);
, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);
else
createEditor();
);
function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);
);
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3052843%2fpolynomials-and-irreducible-polynomials%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
If you want to be precise, you need to apply the well-ordering principle to a non-empty set of $mathbb N$.
For that, define $D = n in mathbb N : textthere is a factor of $P$ of degree $n$ $.
Then $D$ is not empty because $P$ is a factor of $P$.
Let $m = min D$. Then there is a polynomial $Q$ such that $Q$ is a factor of $P$ of degree $m$. The minimality of $m$ implies that $Q$ is irreducible.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
If you want to be precise, you need to apply the well-ordering principle to a non-empty set of $mathbb N$.
For that, define $D = n in mathbb N : textthere is a factor of $P$ of degree $n$ $.
Then $D$ is not empty because $P$ is a factor of $P$.
Let $m = min D$. Then there is a polynomial $Q$ such that $Q$ is a factor of $P$ of degree $m$. The minimality of $m$ implies that $Q$ is irreducible.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
If you want to be precise, you need to apply the well-ordering principle to a non-empty set of $mathbb N$.
For that, define $D = n in mathbb N : textthere is a factor of $P$ of degree $n$ $.
Then $D$ is not empty because $P$ is a factor of $P$.
Let $m = min D$. Then there is a polynomial $Q$ such that $Q$ is a factor of $P$ of degree $m$. The minimality of $m$ implies that $Q$ is irreducible.
$endgroup$
If you want to be precise, you need to apply the well-ordering principle to a non-empty set of $mathbb N$.
For that, define $D = n in mathbb N : textthere is a factor of $P$ of degree $n$ $.
Then $D$ is not empty because $P$ is a factor of $P$.
Let $m = min D$. Then there is a polynomial $Q$ such that $Q$ is a factor of $P$ of degree $m$. The minimality of $m$ implies that $Q$ is irreducible.
edited Dec 26 '18 at 11:46
answered Dec 26 '18 at 11:28
lhflhf
166k11172402
166k11172402
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3052843%2fpolynomials-and-irreducible-polynomials%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
$begingroup$
$S$ must be the set of monic (non-trivial factors of $P$). With this, you can say that $P_1,P_2$ are monic (and have degree $geq1$)
$endgroup$
– Martín Vacas Vignolo
Dec 26 '18 at 11:26
$begingroup$
Why must the factors be monic?
$endgroup$
– PolynomialC
Dec 26 '18 at 11:28
$begingroup$
No. $S$ is a subset of set of all factors. The key is that in your proof you can not say that $deg P_i geq 1$
$endgroup$
– Martín Vacas Vignolo
Dec 26 '18 at 11:30
$begingroup$
Is this to make sure the set is of finite size and thus bounded below? Cheers for the input.
$endgroup$
– PolynomialC
Dec 26 '18 at 11:33