Polynomials and Irreducible polynomialsFactoring polynomials of degree $a p^b$ over extension fields.Factoring polynomials of degree 6 over extension fields.Number of irreducible polynomials of degree $3$ over $mathbbF_3$ and $mathbbF_5$.Finite fields formed from irreducible polynomialsA question about the roots of irreducible polynomials.Proving some polynomials are irreducible using Eisenstein's criterionIrreducible Hurwitz Factorization of A Complex PolynomialIf $f$ has $deg(f)$ distince roots whose order are the same, then is $f$ irreducible?Which family of orthogonal polynomials satisfies these conditions?Sturm sequence computation using Chebyshev polynomials

Proving a function is onto where f(x)=|x|.

Greco-Roman egalitarianism

Could solar power be utilized and substitute coal in the 19th Century

Do Legal Documents Require Signing In Standard Pen Colors?

How do you respond to a colleague from another team when they're wrongly expecting that you'll help them?

Has Darkwing Duck ever met Scrooge McDuck?

Do the concepts of IP address and network interface not belong to the same layer?

If a character with the Alert feat rolls a crit fail on their Perception check, are they surprised?

What linear sensor for a keyboard?

Freedom of speech and where it applies

In Star Trek IV, why did the Bounty go back to a time when whales are already rare?

Can I sign legal documents with a smiley face?

My friend sent me a screenshot of a transaction hash, but when I search for it I find divergent data. What happened?

Greatest common substring

Folder comparison

Using a siddur to Daven from in a seforim store

Is possible to search in vim history?

Is camera lens focus an exact point or a range?

Why is Arduino resetting while driving motors?

Melting point of aspirin, contradicting sources

Why do IPv6 unique local addresses have to have a /48 prefix?

What does the Rambam mean when he says that the planets have souls?

Difference between -| and |- in TikZ

Why does Async/Await work properly when the loop is inside the async function and not the other way around?



Polynomials and Irreducible polynomials


Factoring polynomials of degree $a p^b$ over extension fields.Factoring polynomials of degree 6 over extension fields.Number of irreducible polynomials of degree $3$ over $mathbbF_3$ and $mathbbF_5$.Finite fields formed from irreducible polynomialsA question about the roots of irreducible polynomials.Proving some polynomials are irreducible using Eisenstein's criterionIrreducible Hurwitz Factorization of A Complex PolynomialIf $f$ has $deg(f)$ distince roots whose order are the same, then is $f$ irreducible?Which family of orthogonal polynomials satisfies these conditions?Sturm sequence computation using Chebyshev polynomials













1












$begingroup$


So I'm trying to prove this Proposition:



Every polynomial of degree greater than $0$ is divisible by an irreducible polynomial.



Proof:



Consider a polynomial $P in mathbb R [x]$ of degree $geq 1$



Let $S$ denote the set of non-trivial factors of $P$.



Suppose that $S$ does not contain any irreducible polynomials.



By the well ordering principle let $P_0$ denote the polynomial of least degree in $S$



By our assumption $P_0$ is not irreducible $therefore P_0=P_1P_2$ for some



$P_1,P_2 in mathbb R[x]$



This contradicts the definition of $P_0$ being the polynomial of least degree to be a factor of $P$



Thus we are forced to conclude the polynomial of least degree is irreducible and the claim follows.



$blacksquare$



My main issue is can I use the well ordering principle in this fashion?



thanks










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$











  • $begingroup$
    $S$ must be the set of monic (non-trivial factors of $P$). With this, you can say that $P_1,P_2$ are monic (and have degree $geq1$)
    $endgroup$
    – Martín Vacas Vignolo
    Dec 26 '18 at 11:26











  • $begingroup$
    Why must the factors be monic?
    $endgroup$
    – PolynomialC
    Dec 26 '18 at 11:28










  • $begingroup$
    No. $S$ is a subset of set of all factors. The key is that in your proof you can not say that $deg P_i geq 1$
    $endgroup$
    – Martín Vacas Vignolo
    Dec 26 '18 at 11:30










  • $begingroup$
    Is this to make sure the set is of finite size and thus bounded below? Cheers for the input.
    $endgroup$
    – PolynomialC
    Dec 26 '18 at 11:33















1












$begingroup$


So I'm trying to prove this Proposition:



Every polynomial of degree greater than $0$ is divisible by an irreducible polynomial.



Proof:



Consider a polynomial $P in mathbb R [x]$ of degree $geq 1$



Let $S$ denote the set of non-trivial factors of $P$.



Suppose that $S$ does not contain any irreducible polynomials.



By the well ordering principle let $P_0$ denote the polynomial of least degree in $S$



By our assumption $P_0$ is not irreducible $therefore P_0=P_1P_2$ for some



$P_1,P_2 in mathbb R[x]$



This contradicts the definition of $P_0$ being the polynomial of least degree to be a factor of $P$



Thus we are forced to conclude the polynomial of least degree is irreducible and the claim follows.



$blacksquare$



My main issue is can I use the well ordering principle in this fashion?



thanks










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$











  • $begingroup$
    $S$ must be the set of monic (non-trivial factors of $P$). With this, you can say that $P_1,P_2$ are monic (and have degree $geq1$)
    $endgroup$
    – Martín Vacas Vignolo
    Dec 26 '18 at 11:26











  • $begingroup$
    Why must the factors be monic?
    $endgroup$
    – PolynomialC
    Dec 26 '18 at 11:28










  • $begingroup$
    No. $S$ is a subset of set of all factors. The key is that in your proof you can not say that $deg P_i geq 1$
    $endgroup$
    – Martín Vacas Vignolo
    Dec 26 '18 at 11:30










  • $begingroup$
    Is this to make sure the set is of finite size and thus bounded below? Cheers for the input.
    $endgroup$
    – PolynomialC
    Dec 26 '18 at 11:33













1












1








1





$begingroup$


So I'm trying to prove this Proposition:



Every polynomial of degree greater than $0$ is divisible by an irreducible polynomial.



Proof:



Consider a polynomial $P in mathbb R [x]$ of degree $geq 1$



Let $S$ denote the set of non-trivial factors of $P$.



Suppose that $S$ does not contain any irreducible polynomials.



By the well ordering principle let $P_0$ denote the polynomial of least degree in $S$



By our assumption $P_0$ is not irreducible $therefore P_0=P_1P_2$ for some



$P_1,P_2 in mathbb R[x]$



This contradicts the definition of $P_0$ being the polynomial of least degree to be a factor of $P$



Thus we are forced to conclude the polynomial of least degree is irreducible and the claim follows.



$blacksquare$



My main issue is can I use the well ordering principle in this fashion?



thanks










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$




So I'm trying to prove this Proposition:



Every polynomial of degree greater than $0$ is divisible by an irreducible polynomial.



Proof:



Consider a polynomial $P in mathbb R [x]$ of degree $geq 1$



Let $S$ denote the set of non-trivial factors of $P$.



Suppose that $S$ does not contain any irreducible polynomials.



By the well ordering principle let $P_0$ denote the polynomial of least degree in $S$



By our assumption $P_0$ is not irreducible $therefore P_0=P_1P_2$ for some



$P_1,P_2 in mathbb R[x]$



This contradicts the definition of $P_0$ being the polynomial of least degree to be a factor of $P$



Thus we are forced to conclude the polynomial of least degree is irreducible and the claim follows.



$blacksquare$



My main issue is can I use the well ordering principle in this fashion?



thanks







polynomials irreducible-polynomials






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited Mar 16 at 11:21









Sil

5,31221643




5,31221643










asked Dec 26 '18 at 11:16









PolynomialCPolynomialC

876




876











  • $begingroup$
    $S$ must be the set of monic (non-trivial factors of $P$). With this, you can say that $P_1,P_2$ are monic (and have degree $geq1$)
    $endgroup$
    – Martín Vacas Vignolo
    Dec 26 '18 at 11:26











  • $begingroup$
    Why must the factors be monic?
    $endgroup$
    – PolynomialC
    Dec 26 '18 at 11:28










  • $begingroup$
    No. $S$ is a subset of set of all factors. The key is that in your proof you can not say that $deg P_i geq 1$
    $endgroup$
    – Martín Vacas Vignolo
    Dec 26 '18 at 11:30










  • $begingroup$
    Is this to make sure the set is of finite size and thus bounded below? Cheers for the input.
    $endgroup$
    – PolynomialC
    Dec 26 '18 at 11:33
















  • $begingroup$
    $S$ must be the set of monic (non-trivial factors of $P$). With this, you can say that $P_1,P_2$ are monic (and have degree $geq1$)
    $endgroup$
    – Martín Vacas Vignolo
    Dec 26 '18 at 11:26











  • $begingroup$
    Why must the factors be monic?
    $endgroup$
    – PolynomialC
    Dec 26 '18 at 11:28










  • $begingroup$
    No. $S$ is a subset of set of all factors. The key is that in your proof you can not say that $deg P_i geq 1$
    $endgroup$
    – Martín Vacas Vignolo
    Dec 26 '18 at 11:30










  • $begingroup$
    Is this to make sure the set is of finite size and thus bounded below? Cheers for the input.
    $endgroup$
    – PolynomialC
    Dec 26 '18 at 11:33















$begingroup$
$S$ must be the set of monic (non-trivial factors of $P$). With this, you can say that $P_1,P_2$ are monic (and have degree $geq1$)
$endgroup$
– Martín Vacas Vignolo
Dec 26 '18 at 11:26





$begingroup$
$S$ must be the set of monic (non-trivial factors of $P$). With this, you can say that $P_1,P_2$ are monic (and have degree $geq1$)
$endgroup$
– Martín Vacas Vignolo
Dec 26 '18 at 11:26













$begingroup$
Why must the factors be monic?
$endgroup$
– PolynomialC
Dec 26 '18 at 11:28




$begingroup$
Why must the factors be monic?
$endgroup$
– PolynomialC
Dec 26 '18 at 11:28












$begingroup$
No. $S$ is a subset of set of all factors. The key is that in your proof you can not say that $deg P_i geq 1$
$endgroup$
– Martín Vacas Vignolo
Dec 26 '18 at 11:30




$begingroup$
No. $S$ is a subset of set of all factors. The key is that in your proof you can not say that $deg P_i geq 1$
$endgroup$
– Martín Vacas Vignolo
Dec 26 '18 at 11:30












$begingroup$
Is this to make sure the set is of finite size and thus bounded below? Cheers for the input.
$endgroup$
– PolynomialC
Dec 26 '18 at 11:33




$begingroup$
Is this to make sure the set is of finite size and thus bounded below? Cheers for the input.
$endgroup$
– PolynomialC
Dec 26 '18 at 11:33










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















0












$begingroup$

If you want to be precise, you need to apply the well-ordering principle to a non-empty set of $mathbb N$.



For that, define $D = n in mathbb N : textthere is a factor of $P$ of degree $n$ $.
Then $D$ is not empty because $P$ is a factor of $P$.
Let $m = min D$. Then there is a polynomial $Q$ such that $Q$ is a factor of $P$ of degree $m$. The minimality of $m$ implies that $Q$ is irreducible.






share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$












    Your Answer





    StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
    return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
    StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
    StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
    );
    );
    , "mathjax-editing");

    StackExchange.ready(function()
    var channelOptions =
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "69"
    ;
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
    createEditor();
    );

    else
    createEditor();

    );

    function createEditor()
    StackExchange.prepareEditor(
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
    convertImagesToLinks: true,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: 10,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader:
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    ,
    noCode: true, onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    );



    );













    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function ()
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3052843%2fpolynomials-and-irreducible-polynomials%23new-answer', 'question_page');

    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes








    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    0












    $begingroup$

    If you want to be precise, you need to apply the well-ordering principle to a non-empty set of $mathbb N$.



    For that, define $D = n in mathbb N : textthere is a factor of $P$ of degree $n$ $.
    Then $D$ is not empty because $P$ is a factor of $P$.
    Let $m = min D$. Then there is a polynomial $Q$ such that $Q$ is a factor of $P$ of degree $m$. The minimality of $m$ implies that $Q$ is irreducible.






    share|cite|improve this answer











    $endgroup$

















      0












      $begingroup$

      If you want to be precise, you need to apply the well-ordering principle to a non-empty set of $mathbb N$.



      For that, define $D = n in mathbb N : textthere is a factor of $P$ of degree $n$ $.
      Then $D$ is not empty because $P$ is a factor of $P$.
      Let $m = min D$. Then there is a polynomial $Q$ such that $Q$ is a factor of $P$ of degree $m$. The minimality of $m$ implies that $Q$ is irreducible.






      share|cite|improve this answer











      $endgroup$















        0












        0








        0





        $begingroup$

        If you want to be precise, you need to apply the well-ordering principle to a non-empty set of $mathbb N$.



        For that, define $D = n in mathbb N : textthere is a factor of $P$ of degree $n$ $.
        Then $D$ is not empty because $P$ is a factor of $P$.
        Let $m = min D$. Then there is a polynomial $Q$ such that $Q$ is a factor of $P$ of degree $m$. The minimality of $m$ implies that $Q$ is irreducible.






        share|cite|improve this answer











        $endgroup$



        If you want to be precise, you need to apply the well-ordering principle to a non-empty set of $mathbb N$.



        For that, define $D = n in mathbb N : textthere is a factor of $P$ of degree $n$ $.
        Then $D$ is not empty because $P$ is a factor of $P$.
        Let $m = min D$. Then there is a polynomial $Q$ such that $Q$ is a factor of $P$ of degree $m$. The minimality of $m$ implies that $Q$ is irreducible.







        share|cite|improve this answer














        share|cite|improve this answer



        share|cite|improve this answer








        edited Dec 26 '18 at 11:46

























        answered Dec 26 '18 at 11:28









        lhflhf

        166k11172402




        166k11172402



























            draft saved

            draft discarded
















































            Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid


            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

            Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function ()
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3052843%2fpolynomials-and-irreducible-polynomials%23new-answer', 'question_page');

            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            Popular posts from this blog

            How should I support this large drywall patch? Planned maintenance scheduled April 23, 2019 at 00:00UTC (8:00pm US/Eastern) Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara Unicorn Meta Zoo #1: Why another podcast?How do I cover large gaps in drywall?How do I keep drywall around a patch from crumbling?Can I glue a second layer of drywall?How to patch long strip on drywall?Large drywall patch: how to avoid bulging seams?Drywall Mesh Patch vs. Bulge? To remove or not to remove?How to fix this drywall job?Prep drywall before backsplashWhat's the best way to fix this horrible drywall patch job?Drywall patching using 3M Patch Plus Primer

            random experiment with two different functions on unit interval Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara Planned maintenance scheduled April 23, 2019 at 00:00UTC (8:00pm US/Eastern)Random variable and probability space notionsRandom Walk with EdgesFinding functions where the increase over a random interval is Poisson distributedNumber of days until dayCan an observed event in fact be of zero probability?Unit random processmodels of coins and uniform distributionHow to get the number of successes given $n$ trials , probability $P$ and a random variable $X$Absorbing Markov chain in a computer. Is “almost every” turned into always convergence in computer executions?Stopped random walk is not uniformly integrable

            Lowndes Grove History Architecture References Navigation menu32°48′6″N 79°57′58″W / 32.80167°N 79.96611°W / 32.80167; -79.9661132°48′6″N 79°57′58″W / 32.80167°N 79.96611°W / 32.80167; -79.9661178002500"National Register Information System"Historic houses of South Carolina"Lowndes Grove""+32° 48' 6.00", −79° 57' 58.00""Lowndes Grove, Charleston County (260 St. Margaret St., Charleston)""Lowndes Grove"The Charleston ExpositionIt Happened in South Carolina"Lowndes Grove (House), Saint Margaret Street & Sixth Avenue, Charleston, Charleston County, SC(Photographs)"Plantations of the Carolina Low Countrye