Polynomials and Irreducible polynomialsFactoring polynomials of degree $a p^b$ over extension fields.Factoring polynomials of degree 6 over extension fields.Number of irreducible polynomials of degree $3$ over $mathbbF_3$ and $mathbbF_5$.Finite fields formed from irreducible polynomialsA question about the roots of irreducible polynomials.Proving some polynomials are irreducible using Eisenstein's criterionIrreducible Hurwitz Factorization of A Complex PolynomialIf $f$ has $deg(f)$ distince roots whose order are the same, then is $f$ irreducible?Which family of orthogonal polynomials satisfies these conditions?Sturm sequence computation using Chebyshev polynomials

Proving a function is onto where f(x)=|x|.

Greco-Roman egalitarianism

Could solar power be utilized and substitute coal in the 19th Century

Do Legal Documents Require Signing In Standard Pen Colors?

How do you respond to a colleague from another team when they're wrongly expecting that you'll help them?

Has Darkwing Duck ever met Scrooge McDuck?

Do the concepts of IP address and network interface not belong to the same layer?

If a character with the Alert feat rolls a crit fail on their Perception check, are they surprised?

What linear sensor for a keyboard?

Freedom of speech and where it applies

In Star Trek IV, why did the Bounty go back to a time when whales are already rare?

Can I sign legal documents with a smiley face?

My friend sent me a screenshot of a transaction hash, but when I search for it I find divergent data. What happened?

Greatest common substring

Folder comparison

Using a siddur to Daven from in a seforim store

Is possible to search in vim history?

Is camera lens focus an exact point or a range?

Why is Arduino resetting while driving motors?

Melting point of aspirin, contradicting sources

Why do IPv6 unique local addresses have to have a /48 prefix?

What does the Rambam mean when he says that the planets have souls?

Difference between -| and |- in TikZ

Why does Async/Await work properly when the loop is inside the async function and not the other way around?



Polynomials and Irreducible polynomials


Factoring polynomials of degree $a p^b$ over extension fields.Factoring polynomials of degree 6 over extension fields.Number of irreducible polynomials of degree $3$ over $mathbbF_3$ and $mathbbF_5$.Finite fields formed from irreducible polynomialsA question about the roots of irreducible polynomials.Proving some polynomials are irreducible using Eisenstein's criterionIrreducible Hurwitz Factorization of A Complex PolynomialIf $f$ has $deg(f)$ distince roots whose order are the same, then is $f$ irreducible?Which family of orthogonal polynomials satisfies these conditions?Sturm sequence computation using Chebyshev polynomials













1












$begingroup$


So I'm trying to prove this Proposition:



Every polynomial of degree greater than $0$ is divisible by an irreducible polynomial.



Proof:



Consider a polynomial $P in mathbb R [x]$ of degree $geq 1$



Let $S$ denote the set of non-trivial factors of $P$.



Suppose that $S$ does not contain any irreducible polynomials.



By the well ordering principle let $P_0$ denote the polynomial of least degree in $S$



By our assumption $P_0$ is not irreducible $therefore P_0=P_1P_2$ for some



$P_1,P_2 in mathbb R[x]$



This contradicts the definition of $P_0$ being the polynomial of least degree to be a factor of $P$



Thus we are forced to conclude the polynomial of least degree is irreducible and the claim follows.



$blacksquare$



My main issue is can I use the well ordering principle in this fashion?



thanks










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$











  • $begingroup$
    $S$ must be the set of monic (non-trivial factors of $P$). With this, you can say that $P_1,P_2$ are monic (and have degree $geq1$)
    $endgroup$
    – Martín Vacas Vignolo
    Dec 26 '18 at 11:26











  • $begingroup$
    Why must the factors be monic?
    $endgroup$
    – PolynomialC
    Dec 26 '18 at 11:28










  • $begingroup$
    No. $S$ is a subset of set of all factors. The key is that in your proof you can not say that $deg P_i geq 1$
    $endgroup$
    – Martín Vacas Vignolo
    Dec 26 '18 at 11:30










  • $begingroup$
    Is this to make sure the set is of finite size and thus bounded below? Cheers for the input.
    $endgroup$
    – PolynomialC
    Dec 26 '18 at 11:33















1












$begingroup$


So I'm trying to prove this Proposition:



Every polynomial of degree greater than $0$ is divisible by an irreducible polynomial.



Proof:



Consider a polynomial $P in mathbb R [x]$ of degree $geq 1$



Let $S$ denote the set of non-trivial factors of $P$.



Suppose that $S$ does not contain any irreducible polynomials.



By the well ordering principle let $P_0$ denote the polynomial of least degree in $S$



By our assumption $P_0$ is not irreducible $therefore P_0=P_1P_2$ for some



$P_1,P_2 in mathbb R[x]$



This contradicts the definition of $P_0$ being the polynomial of least degree to be a factor of $P$



Thus we are forced to conclude the polynomial of least degree is irreducible and the claim follows.



$blacksquare$



My main issue is can I use the well ordering principle in this fashion?



thanks










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$











  • $begingroup$
    $S$ must be the set of monic (non-trivial factors of $P$). With this, you can say that $P_1,P_2$ are monic (and have degree $geq1$)
    $endgroup$
    – Martín Vacas Vignolo
    Dec 26 '18 at 11:26











  • $begingroup$
    Why must the factors be monic?
    $endgroup$
    – PolynomialC
    Dec 26 '18 at 11:28










  • $begingroup$
    No. $S$ is a subset of set of all factors. The key is that in your proof you can not say that $deg P_i geq 1$
    $endgroup$
    – Martín Vacas Vignolo
    Dec 26 '18 at 11:30










  • $begingroup$
    Is this to make sure the set is of finite size and thus bounded below? Cheers for the input.
    $endgroup$
    – PolynomialC
    Dec 26 '18 at 11:33













1












1








1





$begingroup$


So I'm trying to prove this Proposition:



Every polynomial of degree greater than $0$ is divisible by an irreducible polynomial.



Proof:



Consider a polynomial $P in mathbb R [x]$ of degree $geq 1$



Let $S$ denote the set of non-trivial factors of $P$.



Suppose that $S$ does not contain any irreducible polynomials.



By the well ordering principle let $P_0$ denote the polynomial of least degree in $S$



By our assumption $P_0$ is not irreducible $therefore P_0=P_1P_2$ for some



$P_1,P_2 in mathbb R[x]$



This contradicts the definition of $P_0$ being the polynomial of least degree to be a factor of $P$



Thus we are forced to conclude the polynomial of least degree is irreducible and the claim follows.



$blacksquare$



My main issue is can I use the well ordering principle in this fashion?



thanks










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$




So I'm trying to prove this Proposition:



Every polynomial of degree greater than $0$ is divisible by an irreducible polynomial.



Proof:



Consider a polynomial $P in mathbb R [x]$ of degree $geq 1$



Let $S$ denote the set of non-trivial factors of $P$.



Suppose that $S$ does not contain any irreducible polynomials.



By the well ordering principle let $P_0$ denote the polynomial of least degree in $S$



By our assumption $P_0$ is not irreducible $therefore P_0=P_1P_2$ for some



$P_1,P_2 in mathbb R[x]$



This contradicts the definition of $P_0$ being the polynomial of least degree to be a factor of $P$



Thus we are forced to conclude the polynomial of least degree is irreducible and the claim follows.



$blacksquare$



My main issue is can I use the well ordering principle in this fashion?



thanks







polynomials irreducible-polynomials






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited Mar 16 at 11:21









Sil

5,31221643




5,31221643










asked Dec 26 '18 at 11:16









PolynomialCPolynomialC

876




876











  • $begingroup$
    $S$ must be the set of monic (non-trivial factors of $P$). With this, you can say that $P_1,P_2$ are monic (and have degree $geq1$)
    $endgroup$
    – Martín Vacas Vignolo
    Dec 26 '18 at 11:26











  • $begingroup$
    Why must the factors be monic?
    $endgroup$
    – PolynomialC
    Dec 26 '18 at 11:28










  • $begingroup$
    No. $S$ is a subset of set of all factors. The key is that in your proof you can not say that $deg P_i geq 1$
    $endgroup$
    – Martín Vacas Vignolo
    Dec 26 '18 at 11:30










  • $begingroup$
    Is this to make sure the set is of finite size and thus bounded below? Cheers for the input.
    $endgroup$
    – PolynomialC
    Dec 26 '18 at 11:33
















  • $begingroup$
    $S$ must be the set of monic (non-trivial factors of $P$). With this, you can say that $P_1,P_2$ are monic (and have degree $geq1$)
    $endgroup$
    – Martín Vacas Vignolo
    Dec 26 '18 at 11:26











  • $begingroup$
    Why must the factors be monic?
    $endgroup$
    – PolynomialC
    Dec 26 '18 at 11:28










  • $begingroup$
    No. $S$ is a subset of set of all factors. The key is that in your proof you can not say that $deg P_i geq 1$
    $endgroup$
    – Martín Vacas Vignolo
    Dec 26 '18 at 11:30










  • $begingroup$
    Is this to make sure the set is of finite size and thus bounded below? Cheers for the input.
    $endgroup$
    – PolynomialC
    Dec 26 '18 at 11:33















$begingroup$
$S$ must be the set of monic (non-trivial factors of $P$). With this, you can say that $P_1,P_2$ are monic (and have degree $geq1$)
$endgroup$
– Martín Vacas Vignolo
Dec 26 '18 at 11:26





$begingroup$
$S$ must be the set of monic (non-trivial factors of $P$). With this, you can say that $P_1,P_2$ are monic (and have degree $geq1$)
$endgroup$
– Martín Vacas Vignolo
Dec 26 '18 at 11:26













$begingroup$
Why must the factors be monic?
$endgroup$
– PolynomialC
Dec 26 '18 at 11:28




$begingroup$
Why must the factors be monic?
$endgroup$
– PolynomialC
Dec 26 '18 at 11:28












$begingroup$
No. $S$ is a subset of set of all factors. The key is that in your proof you can not say that $deg P_i geq 1$
$endgroup$
– Martín Vacas Vignolo
Dec 26 '18 at 11:30




$begingroup$
No. $S$ is a subset of set of all factors. The key is that in your proof you can not say that $deg P_i geq 1$
$endgroup$
– Martín Vacas Vignolo
Dec 26 '18 at 11:30












$begingroup$
Is this to make sure the set is of finite size and thus bounded below? Cheers for the input.
$endgroup$
– PolynomialC
Dec 26 '18 at 11:33




$begingroup$
Is this to make sure the set is of finite size and thus bounded below? Cheers for the input.
$endgroup$
– PolynomialC
Dec 26 '18 at 11:33










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















0












$begingroup$

If you want to be precise, you need to apply the well-ordering principle to a non-empty set of $mathbb N$.



For that, define $D = n in mathbb N : textthere is a factor of $P$ of degree $n$ $.
Then $D$ is not empty because $P$ is a factor of $P$.
Let $m = min D$. Then there is a polynomial $Q$ such that $Q$ is a factor of $P$ of degree $m$. The minimality of $m$ implies that $Q$ is irreducible.






share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$












    Your Answer





    StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
    return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
    StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
    StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
    );
    );
    , "mathjax-editing");

    StackExchange.ready(function()
    var channelOptions =
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "69"
    ;
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
    createEditor();
    );

    else
    createEditor();

    );

    function createEditor()
    StackExchange.prepareEditor(
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
    convertImagesToLinks: true,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: 10,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader:
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    ,
    noCode: true, onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    );



    );













    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function ()
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3052843%2fpolynomials-and-irreducible-polynomials%23new-answer', 'question_page');

    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes








    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    0












    $begingroup$

    If you want to be precise, you need to apply the well-ordering principle to a non-empty set of $mathbb N$.



    For that, define $D = n in mathbb N : textthere is a factor of $P$ of degree $n$ $.
    Then $D$ is not empty because $P$ is a factor of $P$.
    Let $m = min D$. Then there is a polynomial $Q$ such that $Q$ is a factor of $P$ of degree $m$. The minimality of $m$ implies that $Q$ is irreducible.






    share|cite|improve this answer











    $endgroup$

















      0












      $begingroup$

      If you want to be precise, you need to apply the well-ordering principle to a non-empty set of $mathbb N$.



      For that, define $D = n in mathbb N : textthere is a factor of $P$ of degree $n$ $.
      Then $D$ is not empty because $P$ is a factor of $P$.
      Let $m = min D$. Then there is a polynomial $Q$ such that $Q$ is a factor of $P$ of degree $m$. The minimality of $m$ implies that $Q$ is irreducible.






      share|cite|improve this answer











      $endgroup$















        0












        0








        0





        $begingroup$

        If you want to be precise, you need to apply the well-ordering principle to a non-empty set of $mathbb N$.



        For that, define $D = n in mathbb N : textthere is a factor of $P$ of degree $n$ $.
        Then $D$ is not empty because $P$ is a factor of $P$.
        Let $m = min D$. Then there is a polynomial $Q$ such that $Q$ is a factor of $P$ of degree $m$. The minimality of $m$ implies that $Q$ is irreducible.






        share|cite|improve this answer











        $endgroup$



        If you want to be precise, you need to apply the well-ordering principle to a non-empty set of $mathbb N$.



        For that, define $D = n in mathbb N : textthere is a factor of $P$ of degree $n$ $.
        Then $D$ is not empty because $P$ is a factor of $P$.
        Let $m = min D$. Then there is a polynomial $Q$ such that $Q$ is a factor of $P$ of degree $m$. The minimality of $m$ implies that $Q$ is irreducible.







        share|cite|improve this answer














        share|cite|improve this answer



        share|cite|improve this answer








        edited Dec 26 '18 at 11:46

























        answered Dec 26 '18 at 11:28









        lhflhf

        166k11172402




        166k11172402



























            draft saved

            draft discarded
















































            Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid


            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

            Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function ()
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3052843%2fpolynomials-and-irreducible-polynomials%23new-answer', 'question_page');

            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            Popular posts from this blog

            Solar Wings Breeze Design and development Specifications (Breeze) References Navigation menu1368-485X"Hang glider: Breeze (Solar Wings)"e

            Kathakali Contents Etymology and nomenclature History Repertoire Songs and musical instruments Traditional plays Styles: Sampradayam Training centers and awards Relationship to other dance forms See also Notes References External links Navigation menueThe Illustrated Encyclopedia of Hinduism: A-MSouth Asian Folklore: An EncyclopediaRoutledge International Encyclopedia of Women: Global Women's Issues and KnowledgeKathakali Dance-drama: Where Gods and Demons Come to PlayKathakali Dance-drama: Where Gods and Demons Come to PlayKathakali Dance-drama: Where Gods and Demons Come to Play10.1353/atj.2005.0004The Illustrated Encyclopedia of Hinduism: A-MEncyclopedia of HinduismKathakali Dance-drama: Where Gods and Demons Come to PlaySonic Liturgy: Ritual and Music in Hindu Tradition"The Mirror of Gesture"Kathakali Dance-drama: Where Gods and Demons Come to Play"Kathakali"Indian Theatre: Traditions of PerformanceIndian Theatre: Traditions of PerformanceIndian Theatre: Traditions of PerformanceIndian Theatre: Traditions of PerformanceMedieval Indian Literature: An AnthologyThe Oxford Companion to Indian TheatreSouth Asian Folklore: An Encyclopedia : Afghanistan, Bangladesh, India, Nepal, Pakistan, Sri LankaThe Rise of Performance Studies: Rethinking Richard Schechner's Broad SpectrumIndian Theatre: Traditions of PerformanceModern Asian Theatre and Performance 1900-2000Critical Theory and PerformanceBetween Theater and AnthropologyKathakali603847011Indian Theatre: Traditions of PerformanceIndian Theatre: Traditions of PerformanceIndian Theatre: Traditions of PerformanceBetween Theater and AnthropologyBetween Theater and AnthropologyNambeesan Smaraka AwardsArchivedThe Cambridge Guide to TheatreRoutledge International Encyclopedia of Women: Global Women's Issues and KnowledgeThe Garland Encyclopedia of World Music: South Asia : the Indian subcontinentThe Ethos of Noh: Actors and Their Art10.2307/1145740By Means of Performance: Intercultural Studies of Theatre and Ritual10.1017/s204912550000100xReconceiving the Renaissance: A Critical ReaderPerformance TheoryListening to Theatre: The Aural Dimension of Beijing Opera10.2307/1146013Kathakali: The Art of the Non-WorldlyOn KathakaliKathakali, the dance theatreThe Kathakali Complex: Performance & StructureKathakali Dance-Drama: Where Gods and Demons Come to Play10.1093/obo/9780195399318-0071Drama and Ritual of Early Hinduism"In the Shadow of Hollywood Orientalism: Authentic East Indian Dancing"10.1080/08949460490274013Sanskrit Play Production in Ancient IndiaIndian Music: History and StructureBharata, the Nāṭyaśāstra233639306Table of Contents2238067286469807Dance In Indian Painting10.2307/32047833204783Kathakali Dance-Theatre: A Visual Narrative of Sacred Indian MimeIndian Classical Dance: The Renaissance and BeyondKathakali: an indigenous art-form of Keralaeee

            Method to test if a number is a perfect power? Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara Planned maintenance scheduled April 23, 2019 at 00:00UTC (8:00pm US/Eastern)Detecting perfect squares faster than by extracting square rooteffective way to get the integer sequence A181392 from oeisA rarely mentioned fact about perfect powersHow many numbers such $n$ are there that $n<100,lfloorsqrtn rfloor mid n$Check perfect squareness by modulo division against multiple basesFor what pair of integers $(a,b)$ is $3^a + 7^b$ a perfect square.Do there exist any positive integers $n$ such that $lfloore^nrfloor$ is a perfect power? What is the probability that one exists?finding perfect power factors of an integerProve that the sequence contains a perfect square for any natural number $m $ in the domain of $f$ .Counting Perfect Powers