Why is the reduced echelon form of a set of independent vectors, the identity matrix?Why is a square rref with no zero rows always the identity matrix?Why is reduced echelon form of a matrix always the identity matrixExample of Matrix in Reduced Row Echelon FormMatrices - Understanding row echelon form and reduced echelon formWhy is reduced echelon form of a matrix always the identity matrixDifferent representations of a matrix in reduced row echelon formwhy does the reduced row echelon form have the same null space as the original matrix?Is it okay to determine pivot positions in a matrix in echelon form, not in reduced echelon form?Anybody knows a proof of Uniqueness of the Reduced Echelon Form Theorem?Why is a matrix non-invertible if its row-reduced echelon form matrix is not identity?Different answers for reduced row echelon form (ROW vector and Column Vector cases)Adding identity matrix to A and its reduced echelon form

Greco-Roman egalitarianism

Visiting the UK as unmarried couple

Flux received by a negative charge

Divine apple island

Sampling Theorem and reconstruction

Why has "pence" been used in this sentence, not "pences"?

Is XSS in canonical link possible?

How to get the similar sounding words together

Can I rely on this github repository files?

Will adding a BY-SA image to a blog post make the entire post BY-SA?

Greatest common substring

Simulating a probability of 1 of 2^N with less than N random bits

Proving a function is onto where f(x)=|x|.

Why in book's example is used 言葉(ことば) instead of 言語(げんご)?

Drawing ramified coverings with tikz

How do ground effect vehicles perform turns?

How to color a curve

Generating adjacency matrices from isomorphic graphs

Is camera lens focus an exact point or a range?

Why is Arduino resetting while driving motors?

Can the Supreme Court overturn an impeachment?

Can a significant change in incentives void an employment contract?

Are all species of CANNA edible?

When quoting, must I also copy hyphens used to divide words that continue on the next line?



Why is the reduced echelon form of a set of independent vectors, the identity matrix?


Why is a square rref with no zero rows always the identity matrix?Why is reduced echelon form of a matrix always the identity matrixExample of Matrix in Reduced Row Echelon FormMatrices - Understanding row echelon form and reduced echelon formWhy is reduced echelon form of a matrix always the identity matrixDifferent representations of a matrix in reduced row echelon formwhy does the reduced row echelon form have the same null space as the original matrix?Is it okay to determine pivot positions in a matrix in echelon form, not in reduced echelon form?Anybody knows a proof of Uniqueness of the Reduced Echelon Form Theorem?Why is a matrix non-invertible if its row-reduced echelon form matrix is not identity?Different answers for reduced row echelon form (ROW vector and Column Vector cases)Adding identity matrix to A and its reduced echelon form













3












$begingroup$



If a matrix has linearly independent rows, then its reduced echelon form is the identity matrix.




I haven't found a concise explanation for this... I have the whole notion in my head but I cannot express this in words. Can someone explain it?










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$











  • $begingroup$
    Assuming this is about row reduction, it is simply not true: if a matrix contains fewer rows than columns, then so will its reduced row echelon form. Also, the title mentions vectors, not rows; in coordinates, vectors are usually associated with columns. So your title does not match the highlighted statement.
    $endgroup$
    – Marc van Leeuwen
    Nov 17 '16 at 17:55
















3












$begingroup$



If a matrix has linearly independent rows, then its reduced echelon form is the identity matrix.




I haven't found a concise explanation for this... I have the whole notion in my head but I cannot express this in words. Can someone explain it?










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$











  • $begingroup$
    Assuming this is about row reduction, it is simply not true: if a matrix contains fewer rows than columns, then so will its reduced row echelon form. Also, the title mentions vectors, not rows; in coordinates, vectors are usually associated with columns. So your title does not match the highlighted statement.
    $endgroup$
    – Marc van Leeuwen
    Nov 17 '16 at 17:55














3












3








3


1



$begingroup$



If a matrix has linearly independent rows, then its reduced echelon form is the identity matrix.




I haven't found a concise explanation for this... I have the whole notion in my head but I cannot express this in words. Can someone explain it?










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$





If a matrix has linearly independent rows, then its reduced echelon form is the identity matrix.




I haven't found a concise explanation for this... I have the whole notion in my head but I cannot express this in words. Can someone explain it?







linear-algebra matrices






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited Oct 27 '14 at 7:04









Joonas Ilmavirta

20.7k94282




20.7k94282










asked Oct 17 '14 at 6:13









JOXJOX

7841920




7841920











  • $begingroup$
    Assuming this is about row reduction, it is simply not true: if a matrix contains fewer rows than columns, then so will its reduced row echelon form. Also, the title mentions vectors, not rows; in coordinates, vectors are usually associated with columns. So your title does not match the highlighted statement.
    $endgroup$
    – Marc van Leeuwen
    Nov 17 '16 at 17:55

















  • $begingroup$
    Assuming this is about row reduction, it is simply not true: if a matrix contains fewer rows than columns, then so will its reduced row echelon form. Also, the title mentions vectors, not rows; in coordinates, vectors are usually associated with columns. So your title does not match the highlighted statement.
    $endgroup$
    – Marc van Leeuwen
    Nov 17 '16 at 17:55
















$begingroup$
Assuming this is about row reduction, it is simply not true: if a matrix contains fewer rows than columns, then so will its reduced row echelon form. Also, the title mentions vectors, not rows; in coordinates, vectors are usually associated with columns. So your title does not match the highlighted statement.
$endgroup$
– Marc van Leeuwen
Nov 17 '16 at 17:55





$begingroup$
Assuming this is about row reduction, it is simply not true: if a matrix contains fewer rows than columns, then so will its reduced row echelon form. Also, the title mentions vectors, not rows; in coordinates, vectors are usually associated with columns. So your title does not match the highlighted statement.
$endgroup$
– Marc van Leeuwen
Nov 17 '16 at 17:55











3 Answers
3






active

oldest

votes


















2












$begingroup$

An $ntimes n$ matrix whose rows (or columns) form a linearly independent set has rank $n$. The elementary row (or column) operations are rank preserving, so the reduced row echelon form of the matrix will have rank $n$.



Now, using the properties of a matrix in reduced row echelon form (i.e., first nonzero term in each row is $1$, and no nonzero terms in any column with a leading $1$) see if you can show that the only $ntimes n$ matrix of rank $n$ in reduced row echelon form is the identity matrix.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$




















    0












    $begingroup$

    This might help you:



    Suppose we have a matrix $A$ whose columns $v_1,dots,v_k$ are vectors in $Bbb R^n$.



    The reduced echelon form of $A$ will have a pivot in every column if and only if the vectors $v_1,dots,v_k$ are linearly independent. The reduced row echelon form of $A$ will have a pivot in every row if and only if the vectors $v_1,dots,v_k$ span $Bbb R^n$.



    The only reduced matrix with a pivot in every row and every column is the identity matrix.






    share|cite|improve this answer









    $endgroup$




















      0












      $begingroup$

      The contrapositive of this is: If the reduced row echelon form is not the identity matrix, then the rows are linearly dependent.



      This might be easier to understand. First, if the RREF of a square matrix is not the identity matrix, then one row will not have a leading one. That row must be made all of zeroes. Now track how you got this row of zeroes: if you track back to your original matrix, this row of zeroes is obtained as a linear combinations of rows in the original matrix, and the corresponding linear combination gives you a linear dependency of some rows in the matrix.



      As you get a linear dependency, the rows are linearly dependent.






      share|cite|improve this answer









      $endgroup$












        Your Answer





        StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
        return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
        StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
        StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
        );
        );
        , "mathjax-editing");

        StackExchange.ready(function()
        var channelOptions =
        tags: "".split(" "),
        id: "69"
        ;
        initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

        StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
        // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
        if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
        StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
        createEditor();
        );

        else
        createEditor();

        );

        function createEditor()
        StackExchange.prepareEditor(
        heartbeatType: 'answer',
        autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
        convertImagesToLinks: true,
        noModals: true,
        showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
        reputationToPostImages: 10,
        bindNavPrevention: true,
        postfix: "",
        imageUploader:
        brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
        contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
        allowUrls: true
        ,
        noCode: true, onDemand: true,
        discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
        ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
        );



        );













        draft saved

        draft discarded


















        StackExchange.ready(
        function ()
        StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f977819%2fwhy-is-the-reduced-echelon-form-of-a-set-of-independent-vectors-the-identity-ma%23new-answer', 'question_page');

        );

        Post as a guest















        Required, but never shown

























        3 Answers
        3






        active

        oldest

        votes








        3 Answers
        3






        active

        oldest

        votes









        active

        oldest

        votes






        active

        oldest

        votes









        2












        $begingroup$

        An $ntimes n$ matrix whose rows (or columns) form a linearly independent set has rank $n$. The elementary row (or column) operations are rank preserving, so the reduced row echelon form of the matrix will have rank $n$.



        Now, using the properties of a matrix in reduced row echelon form (i.e., first nonzero term in each row is $1$, and no nonzero terms in any column with a leading $1$) see if you can show that the only $ntimes n$ matrix of rank $n$ in reduced row echelon form is the identity matrix.






        share|cite|improve this answer









        $endgroup$

















          2












          $begingroup$

          An $ntimes n$ matrix whose rows (or columns) form a linearly independent set has rank $n$. The elementary row (or column) operations are rank preserving, so the reduced row echelon form of the matrix will have rank $n$.



          Now, using the properties of a matrix in reduced row echelon form (i.e., first nonzero term in each row is $1$, and no nonzero terms in any column with a leading $1$) see if you can show that the only $ntimes n$ matrix of rank $n$ in reduced row echelon form is the identity matrix.






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$















            2












            2








            2





            $begingroup$

            An $ntimes n$ matrix whose rows (or columns) form a linearly independent set has rank $n$. The elementary row (or column) operations are rank preserving, so the reduced row echelon form of the matrix will have rank $n$.



            Now, using the properties of a matrix in reduced row echelon form (i.e., first nonzero term in each row is $1$, and no nonzero terms in any column with a leading $1$) see if you can show that the only $ntimes n$ matrix of rank $n$ in reduced row echelon form is the identity matrix.






            share|cite|improve this answer









            $endgroup$



            An $ntimes n$ matrix whose rows (or columns) form a linearly independent set has rank $n$. The elementary row (or column) operations are rank preserving, so the reduced row echelon form of the matrix will have rank $n$.



            Now, using the properties of a matrix in reduced row echelon form (i.e., first nonzero term in each row is $1$, and no nonzero terms in any column with a leading $1$) see if you can show that the only $ntimes n$ matrix of rank $n$ in reduced row echelon form is the identity matrix.







            share|cite|improve this answer












            share|cite|improve this answer



            share|cite|improve this answer










            answered Oct 17 '14 at 7:05









            JaredJared

            24.2k1047102




            24.2k1047102





















                0












                $begingroup$

                This might help you:



                Suppose we have a matrix $A$ whose columns $v_1,dots,v_k$ are vectors in $Bbb R^n$.



                The reduced echelon form of $A$ will have a pivot in every column if and only if the vectors $v_1,dots,v_k$ are linearly independent. The reduced row echelon form of $A$ will have a pivot in every row if and only if the vectors $v_1,dots,v_k$ span $Bbb R^n$.



                The only reduced matrix with a pivot in every row and every column is the identity matrix.






                share|cite|improve this answer









                $endgroup$

















                  0












                  $begingroup$

                  This might help you:



                  Suppose we have a matrix $A$ whose columns $v_1,dots,v_k$ are vectors in $Bbb R^n$.



                  The reduced echelon form of $A$ will have a pivot in every column if and only if the vectors $v_1,dots,v_k$ are linearly independent. The reduced row echelon form of $A$ will have a pivot in every row if and only if the vectors $v_1,dots,v_k$ span $Bbb R^n$.



                  The only reduced matrix with a pivot in every row and every column is the identity matrix.






                  share|cite|improve this answer









                  $endgroup$















                    0












                    0








                    0





                    $begingroup$

                    This might help you:



                    Suppose we have a matrix $A$ whose columns $v_1,dots,v_k$ are vectors in $Bbb R^n$.



                    The reduced echelon form of $A$ will have a pivot in every column if and only if the vectors $v_1,dots,v_k$ are linearly independent. The reduced row echelon form of $A$ will have a pivot in every row if and only if the vectors $v_1,dots,v_k$ span $Bbb R^n$.



                    The only reduced matrix with a pivot in every row and every column is the identity matrix.






                    share|cite|improve this answer









                    $endgroup$



                    This might help you:



                    Suppose we have a matrix $A$ whose columns $v_1,dots,v_k$ are vectors in $Bbb R^n$.



                    The reduced echelon form of $A$ will have a pivot in every column if and only if the vectors $v_1,dots,v_k$ are linearly independent. The reduced row echelon form of $A$ will have a pivot in every row if and only if the vectors $v_1,dots,v_k$ span $Bbb R^n$.



                    The only reduced matrix with a pivot in every row and every column is the identity matrix.







                    share|cite|improve this answer












                    share|cite|improve this answer



                    share|cite|improve this answer










                    answered Oct 17 '14 at 14:36









                    OmnomnomnomOmnomnomnom

                    129k792185




                    129k792185





















                        0












                        $begingroup$

                        The contrapositive of this is: If the reduced row echelon form is not the identity matrix, then the rows are linearly dependent.



                        This might be easier to understand. First, if the RREF of a square matrix is not the identity matrix, then one row will not have a leading one. That row must be made all of zeroes. Now track how you got this row of zeroes: if you track back to your original matrix, this row of zeroes is obtained as a linear combinations of rows in the original matrix, and the corresponding linear combination gives you a linear dependency of some rows in the matrix.



                        As you get a linear dependency, the rows are linearly dependent.






                        share|cite|improve this answer









                        $endgroup$

















                          0












                          $begingroup$

                          The contrapositive of this is: If the reduced row echelon form is not the identity matrix, then the rows are linearly dependent.



                          This might be easier to understand. First, if the RREF of a square matrix is not the identity matrix, then one row will not have a leading one. That row must be made all of zeroes. Now track how you got this row of zeroes: if you track back to your original matrix, this row of zeroes is obtained as a linear combinations of rows in the original matrix, and the corresponding linear combination gives you a linear dependency of some rows in the matrix.



                          As you get a linear dependency, the rows are linearly dependent.






                          share|cite|improve this answer









                          $endgroup$















                            0












                            0








                            0





                            $begingroup$

                            The contrapositive of this is: If the reduced row echelon form is not the identity matrix, then the rows are linearly dependent.



                            This might be easier to understand. First, if the RREF of a square matrix is not the identity matrix, then one row will not have a leading one. That row must be made all of zeroes. Now track how you got this row of zeroes: if you track back to your original matrix, this row of zeroes is obtained as a linear combinations of rows in the original matrix, and the corresponding linear combination gives you a linear dependency of some rows in the matrix.



                            As you get a linear dependency, the rows are linearly dependent.






                            share|cite|improve this answer









                            $endgroup$



                            The contrapositive of this is: If the reduced row echelon form is not the identity matrix, then the rows are linearly dependent.



                            This might be easier to understand. First, if the RREF of a square matrix is not the identity matrix, then one row will not have a leading one. That row must be made all of zeroes. Now track how you got this row of zeroes: if you track back to your original matrix, this row of zeroes is obtained as a linear combinations of rows in the original matrix, and the corresponding linear combination gives you a linear dependency of some rows in the matrix.



                            As you get a linear dependency, the rows are linearly dependent.







                            share|cite|improve this answer












                            share|cite|improve this answer



                            share|cite|improve this answer










                            answered Oct 9 '16 at 3:16









                            N. S.N. S.

                            105k7114210




                            105k7114210



























                                draft saved

                                draft discarded
















































                                Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


                                • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                                But avoid


                                • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                                • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

                                Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


                                To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                                draft saved


                                draft discarded














                                StackExchange.ready(
                                function ()
                                StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f977819%2fwhy-is-the-reduced-echelon-form-of-a-set-of-independent-vectors-the-identity-ma%23new-answer', 'question_page');

                                );

                                Post as a guest















                                Required, but never shown





















































                                Required, but never shown














                                Required, but never shown












                                Required, but never shown







                                Required, but never shown

































                                Required, but never shown














                                Required, but never shown












                                Required, but never shown







                                Required, but never shown







                                Popular posts from this blog

                                How should I support this large drywall patch? Planned maintenance scheduled April 23, 2019 at 00:00UTC (8:00pm US/Eastern) Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara Unicorn Meta Zoo #1: Why another podcast?How do I cover large gaps in drywall?How do I keep drywall around a patch from crumbling?Can I glue a second layer of drywall?How to patch long strip on drywall?Large drywall patch: how to avoid bulging seams?Drywall Mesh Patch vs. Bulge? To remove or not to remove?How to fix this drywall job?Prep drywall before backsplashWhat's the best way to fix this horrible drywall patch job?Drywall patching using 3M Patch Plus Primer

                                random experiment with two different functions on unit interval Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara Planned maintenance scheduled April 23, 2019 at 00:00UTC (8:00pm US/Eastern)Random variable and probability space notionsRandom Walk with EdgesFinding functions where the increase over a random interval is Poisson distributedNumber of days until dayCan an observed event in fact be of zero probability?Unit random processmodels of coins and uniform distributionHow to get the number of successes given $n$ trials , probability $P$ and a random variable $X$Absorbing Markov chain in a computer. Is “almost every” turned into always convergence in computer executions?Stopped random walk is not uniformly integrable

                                Lowndes Grove History Architecture References Navigation menu32°48′6″N 79°57′58″W / 32.80167°N 79.96611°W / 32.80167; -79.9661132°48′6″N 79°57′58″W / 32.80167°N 79.96611°W / 32.80167; -79.9661178002500"National Register Information System"Historic houses of South Carolina"Lowndes Grove""+32° 48' 6.00", −79° 57' 58.00""Lowndes Grove, Charleston County (260 St. Margaret St., Charleston)""Lowndes Grove"The Charleston ExpositionIt Happened in South Carolina"Lowndes Grove (House), Saint Margaret Street & Sixth Avenue, Charleston, Charleston County, SC(Photographs)"Plantations of the Carolina Low Countrye