$f(X):= X^n- xin K[X]$ is irreducible and $Gal(K(y)/K)cong mathbbZ/nmathbbZ$ if $y$ is a root of $f$Cyclotomic polynomials and Galois groupShow $textGal(K_infty/mathbb Q)cong mathbb Z_p^times$Proof of $Gal(K_1K_2K_3/K)cong Gal(K_1/K)times Gal(K_2/K)times Gal(K_3/K)$Show that $mathbbQ(zeta_n)$ is Galois over $mathbbQ$ and $Gal(mathbbQ(zeta_n)/mathbbQ))cong mathbbZ_n^*$Normal closure $L$ of $K=mathbbQ(sqrt10+3sqrt13)$ and structure of $mathrmGal(L/mathbbQ)$Subgroups of $mathrmGal(overlinemathbbQ/mathbbQ)$Proving $textGal(K/F) cong textGal(K/E_1) times textGal(K/E_2)$Question on $textGal(E_1/F) times textGal(E_2/F) cong textGal(K/E_1) times textGal(K/E_2)$Is : $ mathrmGal : F/ mathbbQ to mathrmGal (F / mathbbQ ) $ represented by $ overline mathbbQ $?f irreducible polynomial with $p-2$ real roots $Rightarrow$ $Gal(mathbbQ_f/mathbbQ) cong S_p$

Can the Supreme Court overturn an impeachment?

How do ground effect vehicles perform turns?

Are all species of CANNA edible?

What is the gram­mat­i­cal term for “‑ed” words like these?

Proof of Lemma: Every nonzero integer can be written as a product of primes

Can I Retrieve Email Addresses from BCC?

How should I respond when I lied about my education and the company finds out through background check?

My friend sent me a screenshot of a transaction hash, but when I search for it I find divergent data. What happened?

Do Legal Documents Require Signing In Standard Pen Colors?

Why is Arduino resetting while driving motors?

What linear sensor for a keyboard?

Drawing ramified coverings with tikz

On a tidally locked planet, would time be quantized?

Visiting the UK as unmarried couple

Folder comparison

Melting point of aspirin, contradicting sources

Why did the EU agree to delay the Brexit deadline?

Ridge Regression with Gradient Descent Converges to OLS estimates

How do I extrude a face to a single vertex

What does this horizontal bar at the first measure mean?

Has Darkwing Duck ever met Scrooge McDuck?

Is there a word to describe the feeling of being transfixed out of horror?

Is a model fitted to data or is data fitted to a model?

Could solar power be utilized and substitute coal in the 19th Century



$f(X):= X^n- xin K[X]$ is irreducible and $Gal(K(y)/K)cong mathbbZ/nmathbbZ$ if $y$ is a root of $f$


Cyclotomic polynomials and Galois groupShow $textGal(K_infty/mathbb Q)cong mathbb Z_p^times$Proof of $Gal(K_1K_2K_3/K)cong Gal(K_1/K)times Gal(K_2/K)times Gal(K_3/K)$Show that $mathbbQ(zeta_n)$ is Galois over $mathbbQ$ and $Gal(mathbbQ(zeta_n)/mathbbQ))cong mathbbZ_n^*$Normal closure $L$ of $K=mathbbQ(sqrt10+3sqrt13)$ and structure of $mathrmGal(L/mathbbQ)$Subgroups of $mathrmGal(overlinemathbbQ/mathbbQ)$Proving $textGal(K/F) cong textGal(K/E_1) times textGal(K/E_2)$Question on $textGal(E_1/F) times textGal(E_2/F) cong textGal(K/E_1) times textGal(K/E_2)$Is : $ mathrmGal : F/ mathbbQ to mathrmGal (F / mathbbQ ) $ represented by $ overline mathbbQ $?f irreducible polynomial with $p-2$ real roots $Rightarrow$ $Gal(mathbbQ_f/mathbbQ) cong S_p$













2












$begingroup$


Hello I need help with solving the following task



Let $K$ be a field with algebraic closure $overlineK$ and $K^times:=Kbackslash 0$. Let $2le n in mathbbZ$ such that $K^times$ contains a primitive nth root of unity. If $charK=p>0$ assume that $pnmid n$ holds and $K^times n:=y^n mid yin K^times$.



i) Let $xin K^times$ be an element with the property that if $0<iin mathbbZ$ and $yin K^times$ exists such that $x^i =y^n$ then $nmid i $ holds. Show that the polynomial $f(X):= X^n- xin K[X]$ is irreducible.



ii) Now let $yin overlineK$ be a root of $f$. Show that $Ksubset K(y)$ is a galois extension with $Gal(K(y)/K)cong mathbbZ/nmathbbZ$.



Thanks in advance for any help.










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$











  • $begingroup$
    The minimal polynomial of $y=x^1/n$ is $F(X) = prod_j=1^l (X-zeta_n^m_j y)$ where the $m_j$ are a subset of $1ldots n$. $F(0) = ?$
    $endgroup$
    – reuns
    Jan 16 at 3:05











  • $begingroup$
    $F(0) = prod_j=1^l (-zeta_n^m_j y)$? Is the aim to show that that minimal polynomial is the same as the function $f$ already?
    $endgroup$
    – Anzu
    Jan 16 at 11:45










  • $begingroup$
    $y = x^1/n$ and product of roots of unity stays a root of unity so $F(0) = ?$
    $endgroup$
    – reuns
    Jan 16 at 12:06
















2












$begingroup$


Hello I need help with solving the following task



Let $K$ be a field with algebraic closure $overlineK$ and $K^times:=Kbackslash 0$. Let $2le n in mathbbZ$ such that $K^times$ contains a primitive nth root of unity. If $charK=p>0$ assume that $pnmid n$ holds and $K^times n:=y^n mid yin K^times$.



i) Let $xin K^times$ be an element with the property that if $0<iin mathbbZ$ and $yin K^times$ exists such that $x^i =y^n$ then $nmid i $ holds. Show that the polynomial $f(X):= X^n- xin K[X]$ is irreducible.



ii) Now let $yin overlineK$ be a root of $f$. Show that $Ksubset K(y)$ is a galois extension with $Gal(K(y)/K)cong mathbbZ/nmathbbZ$.



Thanks in advance for any help.










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$











  • $begingroup$
    The minimal polynomial of $y=x^1/n$ is $F(X) = prod_j=1^l (X-zeta_n^m_j y)$ where the $m_j$ are a subset of $1ldots n$. $F(0) = ?$
    $endgroup$
    – reuns
    Jan 16 at 3:05











  • $begingroup$
    $F(0) = prod_j=1^l (-zeta_n^m_j y)$? Is the aim to show that that minimal polynomial is the same as the function $f$ already?
    $endgroup$
    – Anzu
    Jan 16 at 11:45










  • $begingroup$
    $y = x^1/n$ and product of roots of unity stays a root of unity so $F(0) = ?$
    $endgroup$
    – reuns
    Jan 16 at 12:06














2












2








2





$begingroup$


Hello I need help with solving the following task



Let $K$ be a field with algebraic closure $overlineK$ and $K^times:=Kbackslash 0$. Let $2le n in mathbbZ$ such that $K^times$ contains a primitive nth root of unity. If $charK=p>0$ assume that $pnmid n$ holds and $K^times n:=y^n mid yin K^times$.



i) Let $xin K^times$ be an element with the property that if $0<iin mathbbZ$ and $yin K^times$ exists such that $x^i =y^n$ then $nmid i $ holds. Show that the polynomial $f(X):= X^n- xin K[X]$ is irreducible.



ii) Now let $yin overlineK$ be a root of $f$. Show that $Ksubset K(y)$ is a galois extension with $Gal(K(y)/K)cong mathbbZ/nmathbbZ$.



Thanks in advance for any help.










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$




Hello I need help with solving the following task



Let $K$ be a field with algebraic closure $overlineK$ and $K^times:=Kbackslash 0$. Let $2le n in mathbbZ$ such that $K^times$ contains a primitive nth root of unity. If $charK=p>0$ assume that $pnmid n$ holds and $K^times n:=y^n mid yin K^times$.



i) Let $xin K^times$ be an element with the property that if $0<iin mathbbZ$ and $yin K^times$ exists such that $x^i =y^n$ then $nmid i $ holds. Show that the polynomial $f(X):= X^n- xin K[X]$ is irreducible.



ii) Now let $yin overlineK$ be a root of $f$. Show that $Ksubset K(y)$ is a galois extension with $Gal(K(y)/K)cong mathbbZ/nmathbbZ$.



Thanks in advance for any help.







abstract-algebra galois-theory irreducible-polynomials






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited Mar 16 at 11:20









Sil

5,31221643




5,31221643










asked Jan 15 at 22:17









AnzuAnzu

246




246











  • $begingroup$
    The minimal polynomial of $y=x^1/n$ is $F(X) = prod_j=1^l (X-zeta_n^m_j y)$ where the $m_j$ are a subset of $1ldots n$. $F(0) = ?$
    $endgroup$
    – reuns
    Jan 16 at 3:05











  • $begingroup$
    $F(0) = prod_j=1^l (-zeta_n^m_j y)$? Is the aim to show that that minimal polynomial is the same as the function $f$ already?
    $endgroup$
    – Anzu
    Jan 16 at 11:45










  • $begingroup$
    $y = x^1/n$ and product of roots of unity stays a root of unity so $F(0) = ?$
    $endgroup$
    – reuns
    Jan 16 at 12:06

















  • $begingroup$
    The minimal polynomial of $y=x^1/n$ is $F(X) = prod_j=1^l (X-zeta_n^m_j y)$ where the $m_j$ are a subset of $1ldots n$. $F(0) = ?$
    $endgroup$
    – reuns
    Jan 16 at 3:05











  • $begingroup$
    $F(0) = prod_j=1^l (-zeta_n^m_j y)$? Is the aim to show that that minimal polynomial is the same as the function $f$ already?
    $endgroup$
    – Anzu
    Jan 16 at 11:45










  • $begingroup$
    $y = x^1/n$ and product of roots of unity stays a root of unity so $F(0) = ?$
    $endgroup$
    – reuns
    Jan 16 at 12:06
















$begingroup$
The minimal polynomial of $y=x^1/n$ is $F(X) = prod_j=1^l (X-zeta_n^m_j y)$ where the $m_j$ are a subset of $1ldots n$. $F(0) = ?$
$endgroup$
– reuns
Jan 16 at 3:05





$begingroup$
The minimal polynomial of $y=x^1/n$ is $F(X) = prod_j=1^l (X-zeta_n^m_j y)$ where the $m_j$ are a subset of $1ldots n$. $F(0) = ?$
$endgroup$
– reuns
Jan 16 at 3:05













$begingroup$
$F(0) = prod_j=1^l (-zeta_n^m_j y)$? Is the aim to show that that minimal polynomial is the same as the function $f$ already?
$endgroup$
– Anzu
Jan 16 at 11:45




$begingroup$
$F(0) = prod_j=1^l (-zeta_n^m_j y)$? Is the aim to show that that minimal polynomial is the same as the function $f$ already?
$endgroup$
– Anzu
Jan 16 at 11:45












$begingroup$
$y = x^1/n$ and product of roots of unity stays a root of unity so $F(0) = ?$
$endgroup$
– reuns
Jan 16 at 12:06





$begingroup$
$y = x^1/n$ and product of roots of unity stays a root of unity so $F(0) = ?$
$endgroup$
– reuns
Jan 16 at 12:06











1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















0












$begingroup$

Your problem constitutes the preliminaries of the so called Kummer theory, for which you can consult any textbook on Galois theory. The particular case considered here is simple enough to admit a direct approach. To avoid overlapping with classical proofs, let us follow more or less the hint given by @Reuns.



1) I keep your notations and hypotheses for the base field $K$, except that I prefer to write $ain K^*$ instead of $x$. Let $alpha$ be a fixed $n$-th root of $a$ in $bar K$. All the $n$-th roots of $a$ are of the form $zeta alpha$, where $zeta$ runs through the group $mu_n$ of $n$-th roots of $1$, which is contained in $K^*$, hence $K(alpha)$ is the splitting field of $X^n-a$ over $K$. These roots are distinct because of the hypotheses on char($K$), so finally the extension $L/K$ is galois. To compute its degree, let $f(X)$ be the minimal polynomial of $alpha$ over $K$, of degree $d$ say. As $f(X)$ divides $X^n-a$, it decomposes in $bar K[X]$ into a product of $d$ distinct linear factors of the form $(X-zeta alpha)$. The computation of the constant term $f(0)$ shows immediately that $alpha^d in K^*$. From $n=dq+r$, where $r<d$ or $r=0$ (euclidian division), it follows that $alpha^r in K^*$, hence $a^rin K^*^n$, and the third hypothesis (not used yet) implies that $r=0, n=dq$. But then $alpha^d =bin K^*$ implies $a^d=alpha^nd=(alpha^d)^dq=b^n$, and the third hypothesis again implies $nmid d$, hence $n=d$. NB: This is purely an academic exercise. In Kummer theory, it's much easier to show first the property 2), from which 1) follows.



2) We have seen in 1) that $K(alpha)/K$ is galois, and its degree is $n$ if $a$ mod $K^*^n$ has multiplicative order $n$ (this is the meaning of the third hypothesis). Let $G$ denote the Galois group. Any $sin G$ permutes the roots of $X^n-a$, hence $s(alpha)=zeta_salpha$, with $zeta_sin mu_n$, and the map $s to zeta_s$ is obviously an injective homomorphism of groups $Gtomu_n$. Since $G$ has order $n$, this is actually an isomorphism. NB: The third hypothesis is necessary. In general, one has only that the splitting field of $X^n-a$ is cyclic of degree $d$ over $K$, where $d$ is the multiplicative order of $a$ mod $K^*^n$ .






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$












    Your Answer





    StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
    return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
    StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
    StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
    );
    );
    , "mathjax-editing");

    StackExchange.ready(function()
    var channelOptions =
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "69"
    ;
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
    createEditor();
    );

    else
    createEditor();

    );

    function createEditor()
    StackExchange.prepareEditor(
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
    convertImagesToLinks: true,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: 10,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader:
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    ,
    noCode: true, onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    );



    );













    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function ()
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3075048%2ffx-xn-x-in-kx-is-irreducible-and-galky-k-cong-mathbbz-n-mathbb%23new-answer', 'question_page');

    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes








    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    0












    $begingroup$

    Your problem constitutes the preliminaries of the so called Kummer theory, for which you can consult any textbook on Galois theory. The particular case considered here is simple enough to admit a direct approach. To avoid overlapping with classical proofs, let us follow more or less the hint given by @Reuns.



    1) I keep your notations and hypotheses for the base field $K$, except that I prefer to write $ain K^*$ instead of $x$. Let $alpha$ be a fixed $n$-th root of $a$ in $bar K$. All the $n$-th roots of $a$ are of the form $zeta alpha$, where $zeta$ runs through the group $mu_n$ of $n$-th roots of $1$, which is contained in $K^*$, hence $K(alpha)$ is the splitting field of $X^n-a$ over $K$. These roots are distinct because of the hypotheses on char($K$), so finally the extension $L/K$ is galois. To compute its degree, let $f(X)$ be the minimal polynomial of $alpha$ over $K$, of degree $d$ say. As $f(X)$ divides $X^n-a$, it decomposes in $bar K[X]$ into a product of $d$ distinct linear factors of the form $(X-zeta alpha)$. The computation of the constant term $f(0)$ shows immediately that $alpha^d in K^*$. From $n=dq+r$, where $r<d$ or $r=0$ (euclidian division), it follows that $alpha^r in K^*$, hence $a^rin K^*^n$, and the third hypothesis (not used yet) implies that $r=0, n=dq$. But then $alpha^d =bin K^*$ implies $a^d=alpha^nd=(alpha^d)^dq=b^n$, and the third hypothesis again implies $nmid d$, hence $n=d$. NB: This is purely an academic exercise. In Kummer theory, it's much easier to show first the property 2), from which 1) follows.



    2) We have seen in 1) that $K(alpha)/K$ is galois, and its degree is $n$ if $a$ mod $K^*^n$ has multiplicative order $n$ (this is the meaning of the third hypothesis). Let $G$ denote the Galois group. Any $sin G$ permutes the roots of $X^n-a$, hence $s(alpha)=zeta_salpha$, with $zeta_sin mu_n$, and the map $s to zeta_s$ is obviously an injective homomorphism of groups $Gtomu_n$. Since $G$ has order $n$, this is actually an isomorphism. NB: The third hypothesis is necessary. In general, one has only that the splitting field of $X^n-a$ is cyclic of degree $d$ over $K$, where $d$ is the multiplicative order of $a$ mod $K^*^n$ .






    share|cite|improve this answer









    $endgroup$

















      0












      $begingroup$

      Your problem constitutes the preliminaries of the so called Kummer theory, for which you can consult any textbook on Galois theory. The particular case considered here is simple enough to admit a direct approach. To avoid overlapping with classical proofs, let us follow more or less the hint given by @Reuns.



      1) I keep your notations and hypotheses for the base field $K$, except that I prefer to write $ain K^*$ instead of $x$. Let $alpha$ be a fixed $n$-th root of $a$ in $bar K$. All the $n$-th roots of $a$ are of the form $zeta alpha$, where $zeta$ runs through the group $mu_n$ of $n$-th roots of $1$, which is contained in $K^*$, hence $K(alpha)$ is the splitting field of $X^n-a$ over $K$. These roots are distinct because of the hypotheses on char($K$), so finally the extension $L/K$ is galois. To compute its degree, let $f(X)$ be the minimal polynomial of $alpha$ over $K$, of degree $d$ say. As $f(X)$ divides $X^n-a$, it decomposes in $bar K[X]$ into a product of $d$ distinct linear factors of the form $(X-zeta alpha)$. The computation of the constant term $f(0)$ shows immediately that $alpha^d in K^*$. From $n=dq+r$, where $r<d$ or $r=0$ (euclidian division), it follows that $alpha^r in K^*$, hence $a^rin K^*^n$, and the third hypothesis (not used yet) implies that $r=0, n=dq$. But then $alpha^d =bin K^*$ implies $a^d=alpha^nd=(alpha^d)^dq=b^n$, and the third hypothesis again implies $nmid d$, hence $n=d$. NB: This is purely an academic exercise. In Kummer theory, it's much easier to show first the property 2), from which 1) follows.



      2) We have seen in 1) that $K(alpha)/K$ is galois, and its degree is $n$ if $a$ mod $K^*^n$ has multiplicative order $n$ (this is the meaning of the third hypothesis). Let $G$ denote the Galois group. Any $sin G$ permutes the roots of $X^n-a$, hence $s(alpha)=zeta_salpha$, with $zeta_sin mu_n$, and the map $s to zeta_s$ is obviously an injective homomorphism of groups $Gtomu_n$. Since $G$ has order $n$, this is actually an isomorphism. NB: The third hypothesis is necessary. In general, one has only that the splitting field of $X^n-a$ is cyclic of degree $d$ over $K$, where $d$ is the multiplicative order of $a$ mod $K^*^n$ .






      share|cite|improve this answer









      $endgroup$















        0












        0








        0





        $begingroup$

        Your problem constitutes the preliminaries of the so called Kummer theory, for which you can consult any textbook on Galois theory. The particular case considered here is simple enough to admit a direct approach. To avoid overlapping with classical proofs, let us follow more or less the hint given by @Reuns.



        1) I keep your notations and hypotheses for the base field $K$, except that I prefer to write $ain K^*$ instead of $x$. Let $alpha$ be a fixed $n$-th root of $a$ in $bar K$. All the $n$-th roots of $a$ are of the form $zeta alpha$, where $zeta$ runs through the group $mu_n$ of $n$-th roots of $1$, which is contained in $K^*$, hence $K(alpha)$ is the splitting field of $X^n-a$ over $K$. These roots are distinct because of the hypotheses on char($K$), so finally the extension $L/K$ is galois. To compute its degree, let $f(X)$ be the minimal polynomial of $alpha$ over $K$, of degree $d$ say. As $f(X)$ divides $X^n-a$, it decomposes in $bar K[X]$ into a product of $d$ distinct linear factors of the form $(X-zeta alpha)$. The computation of the constant term $f(0)$ shows immediately that $alpha^d in K^*$. From $n=dq+r$, where $r<d$ or $r=0$ (euclidian division), it follows that $alpha^r in K^*$, hence $a^rin K^*^n$, and the third hypothesis (not used yet) implies that $r=0, n=dq$. But then $alpha^d =bin K^*$ implies $a^d=alpha^nd=(alpha^d)^dq=b^n$, and the third hypothesis again implies $nmid d$, hence $n=d$. NB: This is purely an academic exercise. In Kummer theory, it's much easier to show first the property 2), from which 1) follows.



        2) We have seen in 1) that $K(alpha)/K$ is galois, and its degree is $n$ if $a$ mod $K^*^n$ has multiplicative order $n$ (this is the meaning of the third hypothesis). Let $G$ denote the Galois group. Any $sin G$ permutes the roots of $X^n-a$, hence $s(alpha)=zeta_salpha$, with $zeta_sin mu_n$, and the map $s to zeta_s$ is obviously an injective homomorphism of groups $Gtomu_n$. Since $G$ has order $n$, this is actually an isomorphism. NB: The third hypothesis is necessary. In general, one has only that the splitting field of $X^n-a$ is cyclic of degree $d$ over $K$, where $d$ is the multiplicative order of $a$ mod $K^*^n$ .






        share|cite|improve this answer









        $endgroup$



        Your problem constitutes the preliminaries of the so called Kummer theory, for which you can consult any textbook on Galois theory. The particular case considered here is simple enough to admit a direct approach. To avoid overlapping with classical proofs, let us follow more or less the hint given by @Reuns.



        1) I keep your notations and hypotheses for the base field $K$, except that I prefer to write $ain K^*$ instead of $x$. Let $alpha$ be a fixed $n$-th root of $a$ in $bar K$. All the $n$-th roots of $a$ are of the form $zeta alpha$, where $zeta$ runs through the group $mu_n$ of $n$-th roots of $1$, which is contained in $K^*$, hence $K(alpha)$ is the splitting field of $X^n-a$ over $K$. These roots are distinct because of the hypotheses on char($K$), so finally the extension $L/K$ is galois. To compute its degree, let $f(X)$ be the minimal polynomial of $alpha$ over $K$, of degree $d$ say. As $f(X)$ divides $X^n-a$, it decomposes in $bar K[X]$ into a product of $d$ distinct linear factors of the form $(X-zeta alpha)$. The computation of the constant term $f(0)$ shows immediately that $alpha^d in K^*$. From $n=dq+r$, where $r<d$ or $r=0$ (euclidian division), it follows that $alpha^r in K^*$, hence $a^rin K^*^n$, and the third hypothesis (not used yet) implies that $r=0, n=dq$. But then $alpha^d =bin K^*$ implies $a^d=alpha^nd=(alpha^d)^dq=b^n$, and the third hypothesis again implies $nmid d$, hence $n=d$. NB: This is purely an academic exercise. In Kummer theory, it's much easier to show first the property 2), from which 1) follows.



        2) We have seen in 1) that $K(alpha)/K$ is galois, and its degree is $n$ if $a$ mod $K^*^n$ has multiplicative order $n$ (this is the meaning of the third hypothesis). Let $G$ denote the Galois group. Any $sin G$ permutes the roots of $X^n-a$, hence $s(alpha)=zeta_salpha$, with $zeta_sin mu_n$, and the map $s to zeta_s$ is obviously an injective homomorphism of groups $Gtomu_n$. Since $G$ has order $n$, this is actually an isomorphism. NB: The third hypothesis is necessary. In general, one has only that the splitting field of $X^n-a$ is cyclic of degree $d$ over $K$, where $d$ is the multiplicative order of $a$ mod $K^*^n$ .







        share|cite|improve this answer












        share|cite|improve this answer



        share|cite|improve this answer










        answered Jan 17 at 21:27









        nguyen quang donguyen quang do

        9,0091724




        9,0091724



























            draft saved

            draft discarded
















































            Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid


            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

            Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function ()
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3075048%2ffx-xn-x-in-kx-is-irreducible-and-galky-k-cong-mathbbz-n-mathbb%23new-answer', 'question_page');

            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            Popular posts from this blog

            How should I support this large drywall patch? Planned maintenance scheduled April 23, 2019 at 00:00UTC (8:00pm US/Eastern) Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara Unicorn Meta Zoo #1: Why another podcast?How do I cover large gaps in drywall?How do I keep drywall around a patch from crumbling?Can I glue a second layer of drywall?How to patch long strip on drywall?Large drywall patch: how to avoid bulging seams?Drywall Mesh Patch vs. Bulge? To remove or not to remove?How to fix this drywall job?Prep drywall before backsplashWhat's the best way to fix this horrible drywall patch job?Drywall patching using 3M Patch Plus Primer

            random experiment with two different functions on unit interval Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara Planned maintenance scheduled April 23, 2019 at 00:00UTC (8:00pm US/Eastern)Random variable and probability space notionsRandom Walk with EdgesFinding functions where the increase over a random interval is Poisson distributedNumber of days until dayCan an observed event in fact be of zero probability?Unit random processmodels of coins and uniform distributionHow to get the number of successes given $n$ trials , probability $P$ and a random variable $X$Absorbing Markov chain in a computer. Is “almost every” turned into always convergence in computer executions?Stopped random walk is not uniformly integrable

            Lowndes Grove History Architecture References Navigation menu32°48′6″N 79°57′58″W / 32.80167°N 79.96611°W / 32.80167; -79.9661132°48′6″N 79°57′58″W / 32.80167°N 79.96611°W / 32.80167; -79.9661178002500"National Register Information System"Historic houses of South Carolina"Lowndes Grove""+32° 48' 6.00", −79° 57' 58.00""Lowndes Grove, Charleston County (260 St. Margaret St., Charleston)""Lowndes Grove"The Charleston ExpositionIt Happened in South Carolina"Lowndes Grove (House), Saint Margaret Street & Sixth Avenue, Charleston, Charleston County, SC(Photographs)"Plantations of the Carolina Low Countrye