Line integral path independence proof checkFinding work via Line Integralsfinding the parametric path for line integralparameterise line segment or functionCompute line integral for vector function along the curveFinding work done by force with line integralsBasic Line Integral for Workderiving the formula of the torsion of a curveCalculation of the line integral of a vector field along a pathTried a line integral and then did it using Stokes theorem, but I'm getting different results…Computing the line integral of the oriented curve
Can the Supreme Court overturn an impeachment?
ArcGIS not connecting to PostgreSQL db with all upper-case name
When quoting, must I also copy hyphens used to divide words that continue on the next line?
Greatest common substring
API Access HTML/Javascript
Did US corporations pay demonstrators in the German demonstrations against article 13?
Why is Arduino resetting while driving motors?
Find last 3 digits of this monster number
How will losing mobility of one hand affect my career as a programmer?
THT: What is a squared annular “ring”?
Divine apple island
Is it possible to use .desktop files to open local pdf files on specific pages with a browser?
Why in book's example is used 言葉(ことば) instead of 言語(げんご)?
Can I use my Chinese passport to enter China after I acquired another citizenship?
Could solar power be utilized and substitute coal in the 19th Century
Why does Async/Await work properly when the loop is inside the async function and not the other way around?
In Star Trek IV, why did the Bounty go back to a time when whales are already rare?
Could the E-bike drivetrain wear down till needing replacement after 400 km?
Proof of Lemma: Every nonzero integer can be written as a product of primes
Translation of Scottish 16th century church stained glass
How to color a curve
If a character with the Alert feat rolls a crit fail on their Perception check, are they surprised?
Visiting the UK as unmarried couple
Should I stop contributing to retirement accounts?
Line integral path independence proof check
Finding work via Line Integralsfinding the parametric path for line integralparameterise line segment or functionCompute line integral for vector function along the curveFinding work done by force with line integralsBasic Line Integral for Workderiving the formula of the torsion of a curveCalculation of the line integral of a vector field along a pathTried a line integral and then did it using Stokes theorem, but I'm getting different results…Computing the line integral of the oriented curve
$begingroup$
Find the work done by the force $F(x, y, z) = (x^4y^5, x^3)$ along the curve
C given by the part of the graph of $y$ = $(x^3)$ from $(0, 0)$ to $(-1, -1)$.
I first checked for independence, which did not work.
Next I parameterized the curve by $r(t) = [x(t),y(t)]$,
beginalign*
x(t) &= t, \
y(t)&=t^3
endalign*
which has
$$dr= (1, 3t^2). $$
Computing the work is then
$$int_0^-1 (t^19,t^3)cdot (1,3t^2),dt = 11/20.$$
Is this correct?
calculus proof-verification line-integrals
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Find the work done by the force $F(x, y, z) = (x^4y^5, x^3)$ along the curve
C given by the part of the graph of $y$ = $(x^3)$ from $(0, 0)$ to $(-1, -1)$.
I first checked for independence, which did not work.
Next I parameterized the curve by $r(t) = [x(t),y(t)]$,
beginalign*
x(t) &= t, \
y(t)&=t^3
endalign*
which has
$$dr= (1, 3t^2). $$
Computing the work is then
$$int_0^-1 (t^19,t^3)cdot (1,3t^2),dt = 11/20.$$
Is this correct?
calculus proof-verification line-integrals
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Find the work done by the force $F(x, y, z) = (x^4y^5, x^3)$ along the curve
C given by the part of the graph of $y$ = $(x^3)$ from $(0, 0)$ to $(-1, -1)$.
I first checked for independence, which did not work.
Next I parameterized the curve by $r(t) = [x(t),y(t)]$,
beginalign*
x(t) &= t, \
y(t)&=t^3
endalign*
which has
$$dr= (1, 3t^2). $$
Computing the work is then
$$int_0^-1 (t^19,t^3)cdot (1,3t^2),dt = 11/20.$$
Is this correct?
calculus proof-verification line-integrals
$endgroup$
Find the work done by the force $F(x, y, z) = (x^4y^5, x^3)$ along the curve
C given by the part of the graph of $y$ = $(x^3)$ from $(0, 0)$ to $(-1, -1)$.
I first checked for independence, which did not work.
Next I parameterized the curve by $r(t) = [x(t),y(t)]$,
beginalign*
x(t) &= t, \
y(t)&=t^3
endalign*
which has
$$dr= (1, 3t^2). $$
Computing the work is then
$$int_0^-1 (t^19,t^3)cdot (1,3t^2),dt = 11/20.$$
Is this correct?
calculus proof-verification line-integrals
calculus proof-verification line-integrals
edited Mar 16 at 10:45
Benjamin
625419
625419
asked Mar 16 at 5:12
MasterYoshiMasterYoshi
807
807
add a comment |
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
Looks fine to me. By "check independence" I assume you mean that you computed that $nabla times F neq 0$ so that $F$ has no chance of being integrable.
As a sanity check, when $x<0,y<0$ then $F$ points to the bottom-left, so that a positive work along the given curve segment is expected.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
);
);
, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);
else
createEditor();
);
function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);
);
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3150097%2fline-integral-path-independence-proof-check%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
Looks fine to me. By "check independence" I assume you mean that you computed that $nabla times F neq 0$ so that $F$ has no chance of being integrable.
As a sanity check, when $x<0,y<0$ then $F$ points to the bottom-left, so that a positive work along the given curve segment is expected.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Looks fine to me. By "check independence" I assume you mean that you computed that $nabla times F neq 0$ so that $F$ has no chance of being integrable.
As a sanity check, when $x<0,y<0$ then $F$ points to the bottom-left, so that a positive work along the given curve segment is expected.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Looks fine to me. By "check independence" I assume you mean that you computed that $nabla times F neq 0$ so that $F$ has no chance of being integrable.
As a sanity check, when $x<0,y<0$ then $F$ points to the bottom-left, so that a positive work along the given curve segment is expected.
$endgroup$
Looks fine to me. By "check independence" I assume you mean that you computed that $nabla times F neq 0$ so that $F$ has no chance of being integrable.
As a sanity check, when $x<0,y<0$ then $F$ points to the bottom-left, so that a positive work along the given curve segment is expected.
answered Mar 16 at 7:34
user7530user7530
35.1k761114
35.1k761114
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3150097%2fline-integral-path-independence-proof-check%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown