Question about the Dirac-delta function The 2019 Stack Overflow Developer Survey Results Are InDiffusion equation in an infinite mediumDirac Delta Function as Initial condition for 1D Diffusion PDE: ONE or TWO equations(conditions)?Solving Poisson's equation for $varrho(mathbfr) = sigma cosleft(frac2 piL xright) , delta(y)$Inverse fourier transform for the heat equationA specific partial differential equation using Fourier TransformFourier Transform Dirac DeltaUsing the Dirac Delta function in PDE'sRepresentation formula for harmonic function and Dirac Delta functionPartial Differential Equation using Fourier Sine TransformQuestions about the heat equation

Is "plugging out" electronic devices an American expression?

What is the accessibility of a package's `Private` context variables?

How to type this arrow in math mode?

What does Linus Torvalds mean when he says that Git "never ever" tracks a file?

Output the Arecibo Message

What is the meaning of Triage in Cybersec world?

Is bread bad for ducks?

What could be the right powersource for 15 seconds lifespan disposable giant chainsaw?

What does ひと匙 mean in this manga and has it been used colloquially?

How are circuits which use complex ICs normally simulated?

Is this app Icon Browser Safe/Legit?

Did Scotland spend $250,000 for the slogan "Welcome to Scotland"?

Should I use my personal e-mail address, or my workplace one, when registering to external websites for work purposes?

What is the most effective way of iterating a std::vector and why?

Which Sci-Fi work first showed weapon of galactic-scale mass destruction?

Return to UK after having been refused entry years ago

The difference between dialogue marks

Why is the maximum length of OpenWrt’s root password 8 characters?

How to notate time signature switching consistently every measure

What tool would a Roman-age civilization have for the breaking of silver and other metals into dust?

Can someone be penalized for an "unlawful" act if no penalty is specified?

One word riddle: Vowel in the middle

Can one be advised by a professor who is very far away?

Can you compress metal and what would be the consequences?



Question about the Dirac-delta function



The 2019 Stack Overflow Developer Survey Results Are InDiffusion equation in an infinite mediumDirac Delta Function as Initial condition for 1D Diffusion PDE: ONE or TWO equations(conditions)?Solving Poisson's equation for $varrho(mathbfr) = sigma cosleft(frac2 piL xright) , delta(y)$Inverse fourier transform for the heat equationA specific partial differential equation using Fourier TransformFourier Transform Dirac DeltaUsing the Dirac Delta function in PDE'sRepresentation formula for harmonic function and Dirac Delta functionPartial Differential Equation using Fourier Sine TransformQuestions about the heat equation










0












$begingroup$



The equation$$ u_t = frac14 u_xx, ; ; ; (x,t) in Omega = (- infty,
infty) times (0, infty) $$



can be solved using Fourier transform and the solution is



$$ u(x,t) = frac1sqrt pi t intlimits_-infty^infty
g(y) mathrme^ - (x-y)^2/ t mathrmd y $$



What is the solution for initial condition $u(x,0) = delta(x+1)$?
Where $delta(x)$ is the Dirac delta function




thought:



We know $g(x) = u(x,0)$ is the initial condition. I know $delta(x+1) = infty$ when $x=-1$ and zero otherwise. So, if I plug this into my solution I get something of the form



$$ u(x,t) = frac1sqrtpi t * (infty ) * mathrme^ - (x+1)^2/ t $$



How to simplify such expression?










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$







  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Forget the informal "$=infty$ when $x=0$ and $=0$ otherwise" description of the delta-function. The (or a) proper definition of the delta function is in how it acts under an integral, namely $int_-infty^infty f(x)delta(x-a)rm dx equiv f(a)$. This is all you need here.
    $endgroup$
    – Winther
    Mar 23 at 19:25
















0












$begingroup$



The equation$$ u_t = frac14 u_xx, ; ; ; (x,t) in Omega = (- infty,
infty) times (0, infty) $$



can be solved using Fourier transform and the solution is



$$ u(x,t) = frac1sqrt pi t intlimits_-infty^infty
g(y) mathrme^ - (x-y)^2/ t mathrmd y $$



What is the solution for initial condition $u(x,0) = delta(x+1)$?
Where $delta(x)$ is the Dirac delta function




thought:



We know $g(x) = u(x,0)$ is the initial condition. I know $delta(x+1) = infty$ when $x=-1$ and zero otherwise. So, if I plug this into my solution I get something of the form



$$ u(x,t) = frac1sqrtpi t * (infty ) * mathrme^ - (x+1)^2/ t $$



How to simplify such expression?










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$







  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Forget the informal "$=infty$ when $x=0$ and $=0$ otherwise" description of the delta-function. The (or a) proper definition of the delta function is in how it acts under an integral, namely $int_-infty^infty f(x)delta(x-a)rm dx equiv f(a)$. This is all you need here.
    $endgroup$
    – Winther
    Mar 23 at 19:25














0












0








0





$begingroup$



The equation$$ u_t = frac14 u_xx, ; ; ; (x,t) in Omega = (- infty,
infty) times (0, infty) $$



can be solved using Fourier transform and the solution is



$$ u(x,t) = frac1sqrt pi t intlimits_-infty^infty
g(y) mathrme^ - (x-y)^2/ t mathrmd y $$



What is the solution for initial condition $u(x,0) = delta(x+1)$?
Where $delta(x)$ is the Dirac delta function




thought:



We know $g(x) = u(x,0)$ is the initial condition. I know $delta(x+1) = infty$ when $x=-1$ and zero otherwise. So, if I plug this into my solution I get something of the form



$$ u(x,t) = frac1sqrtpi t * (infty ) * mathrme^ - (x+1)^2/ t $$



How to simplify such expression?










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$





The equation$$ u_t = frac14 u_xx, ; ; ; (x,t) in Omega = (- infty,
infty) times (0, infty) $$



can be solved using Fourier transform and the solution is



$$ u(x,t) = frac1sqrt pi t intlimits_-infty^infty
g(y) mathrme^ - (x-y)^2/ t mathrmd y $$



What is the solution for initial condition $u(x,0) = delta(x+1)$?
Where $delta(x)$ is the Dirac delta function




thought:



We know $g(x) = u(x,0)$ is the initial condition. I know $delta(x+1) = infty$ when $x=-1$ and zero otherwise. So, if I plug this into my solution I get something of the form



$$ u(x,t) = frac1sqrtpi t * (infty ) * mathrme^ - (x+1)^2/ t $$



How to simplify such expression?







pde






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited Mar 23 at 18:41









Bernard

124k741117




124k741117










asked Mar 23 at 18:39









JamesJames

2,636425




2,636425







  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Forget the informal "$=infty$ when $x=0$ and $=0$ otherwise" description of the delta-function. The (or a) proper definition of the delta function is in how it acts under an integral, namely $int_-infty^infty f(x)delta(x-a)rm dx equiv f(a)$. This is all you need here.
    $endgroup$
    – Winther
    Mar 23 at 19:25













  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Forget the informal "$=infty$ when $x=0$ and $=0$ otherwise" description of the delta-function. The (or a) proper definition of the delta function is in how it acts under an integral, namely $int_-infty^infty f(x)delta(x-a)rm dx equiv f(a)$. This is all you need here.
    $endgroup$
    – Winther
    Mar 23 at 19:25








1




1




$begingroup$
Forget the informal "$=infty$ when $x=0$ and $=0$ otherwise" description of the delta-function. The (or a) proper definition of the delta function is in how it acts under an integral, namely $int_-infty^infty f(x)delta(x-a)rm dx equiv f(a)$. This is all you need here.
$endgroup$
– Winther
Mar 23 at 19:25





$begingroup$
Forget the informal "$=infty$ when $x=0$ and $=0$ otherwise" description of the delta-function. The (or a) proper definition of the delta function is in how it acts under an integral, namely $int_-infty^infty f(x)delta(x-a)rm dx equiv f(a)$. This is all you need here.
$endgroup$
– Winther
Mar 23 at 19:25











1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















2












$begingroup$

In your statement, I think you mean that the function $g(y) = u(y,0)$ contains the initial conditions. Then to answer your question, you need to perform the integral with $g(y) = delta(y+1)$. This can be done quite easily since integration against a $delta$ simply evaluates the integrand at the support of the $delta$. So in your case, we would have $u(x,t) = frac1sqrtpi t e^-(x+1)^2/t$, and there is no need for the "infinity" that you write above. (Edit: I completely agree with the comment by Winther, you should probably not think of the delta function as being "equal to infinity" at the origin, just use the integral property that Winther stated as the defining property of the delta function.)



Edit to answer your comment: If we replace the $delta(x-1)$ by a Heaviside $H(x-1)$ then since
$$H(x-1) = cases0,,textfor x<1,\ 1,,textfor x>1,$$
we need to evaluate the integral
$$u(x,t)=frac1sqrtpi tint_1^inftye^-(x-y)^2/t ,mathrmdy.$$
I think you should be able to do this in terms of the error function.






share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    thanks for your asnwer. I have a question, how if we replace delta function with heaviside $H(x-1)$? How would solution look now?
    $endgroup$
    – James
    Mar 23 at 19:28










  • $begingroup$
    @JimmySabater I have added some extra comments for you :)
    $endgroup$
    – bobcliffe
    Mar 24 at 16:16











Your Answer





StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
);
);
, "mathjax-editing");

StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);

else
createEditor();

);

function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);



);













draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3159684%2fquestion-about-the-dirac-delta-function%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes








1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes









2












$begingroup$

In your statement, I think you mean that the function $g(y) = u(y,0)$ contains the initial conditions. Then to answer your question, you need to perform the integral with $g(y) = delta(y+1)$. This can be done quite easily since integration against a $delta$ simply evaluates the integrand at the support of the $delta$. So in your case, we would have $u(x,t) = frac1sqrtpi t e^-(x+1)^2/t$, and there is no need for the "infinity" that you write above. (Edit: I completely agree with the comment by Winther, you should probably not think of the delta function as being "equal to infinity" at the origin, just use the integral property that Winther stated as the defining property of the delta function.)



Edit to answer your comment: If we replace the $delta(x-1)$ by a Heaviside $H(x-1)$ then since
$$H(x-1) = cases0,,textfor x<1,\ 1,,textfor x>1,$$
we need to evaluate the integral
$$u(x,t)=frac1sqrtpi tint_1^inftye^-(x-y)^2/t ,mathrmdy.$$
I think you should be able to do this in terms of the error function.






share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    thanks for your asnwer. I have a question, how if we replace delta function with heaviside $H(x-1)$? How would solution look now?
    $endgroup$
    – James
    Mar 23 at 19:28










  • $begingroup$
    @JimmySabater I have added some extra comments for you :)
    $endgroup$
    – bobcliffe
    Mar 24 at 16:16















2












$begingroup$

In your statement, I think you mean that the function $g(y) = u(y,0)$ contains the initial conditions. Then to answer your question, you need to perform the integral with $g(y) = delta(y+1)$. This can be done quite easily since integration against a $delta$ simply evaluates the integrand at the support of the $delta$. So in your case, we would have $u(x,t) = frac1sqrtpi t e^-(x+1)^2/t$, and there is no need for the "infinity" that you write above. (Edit: I completely agree with the comment by Winther, you should probably not think of the delta function as being "equal to infinity" at the origin, just use the integral property that Winther stated as the defining property of the delta function.)



Edit to answer your comment: If we replace the $delta(x-1)$ by a Heaviside $H(x-1)$ then since
$$H(x-1) = cases0,,textfor x<1,\ 1,,textfor x>1,$$
we need to evaluate the integral
$$u(x,t)=frac1sqrtpi tint_1^inftye^-(x-y)^2/t ,mathrmdy.$$
I think you should be able to do this in terms of the error function.






share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    thanks for your asnwer. I have a question, how if we replace delta function with heaviside $H(x-1)$? How would solution look now?
    $endgroup$
    – James
    Mar 23 at 19:28










  • $begingroup$
    @JimmySabater I have added some extra comments for you :)
    $endgroup$
    – bobcliffe
    Mar 24 at 16:16













2












2








2





$begingroup$

In your statement, I think you mean that the function $g(y) = u(y,0)$ contains the initial conditions. Then to answer your question, you need to perform the integral with $g(y) = delta(y+1)$. This can be done quite easily since integration against a $delta$ simply evaluates the integrand at the support of the $delta$. So in your case, we would have $u(x,t) = frac1sqrtpi t e^-(x+1)^2/t$, and there is no need for the "infinity" that you write above. (Edit: I completely agree with the comment by Winther, you should probably not think of the delta function as being "equal to infinity" at the origin, just use the integral property that Winther stated as the defining property of the delta function.)



Edit to answer your comment: If we replace the $delta(x-1)$ by a Heaviside $H(x-1)$ then since
$$H(x-1) = cases0,,textfor x<1,\ 1,,textfor x>1,$$
we need to evaluate the integral
$$u(x,t)=frac1sqrtpi tint_1^inftye^-(x-y)^2/t ,mathrmdy.$$
I think you should be able to do this in terms of the error function.






share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$



In your statement, I think you mean that the function $g(y) = u(y,0)$ contains the initial conditions. Then to answer your question, you need to perform the integral with $g(y) = delta(y+1)$. This can be done quite easily since integration against a $delta$ simply evaluates the integrand at the support of the $delta$. So in your case, we would have $u(x,t) = frac1sqrtpi t e^-(x+1)^2/t$, and there is no need for the "infinity" that you write above. (Edit: I completely agree with the comment by Winther, you should probably not think of the delta function as being "equal to infinity" at the origin, just use the integral property that Winther stated as the defining property of the delta function.)



Edit to answer your comment: If we replace the $delta(x-1)$ by a Heaviside $H(x-1)$ then since
$$H(x-1) = cases0,,textfor x<1,\ 1,,textfor x>1,$$
we need to evaluate the integral
$$u(x,t)=frac1sqrtpi tint_1^inftye^-(x-y)^2/t ,mathrmdy.$$
I think you should be able to do this in terms of the error function.







share|cite|improve this answer














share|cite|improve this answer



share|cite|improve this answer








edited Mar 24 at 16:15

























answered Mar 23 at 19:21









bobcliffebobcliffe

1506




1506











  • $begingroup$
    thanks for your asnwer. I have a question, how if we replace delta function with heaviside $H(x-1)$? How would solution look now?
    $endgroup$
    – James
    Mar 23 at 19:28










  • $begingroup$
    @JimmySabater I have added some extra comments for you :)
    $endgroup$
    – bobcliffe
    Mar 24 at 16:16
















  • $begingroup$
    thanks for your asnwer. I have a question, how if we replace delta function with heaviside $H(x-1)$? How would solution look now?
    $endgroup$
    – James
    Mar 23 at 19:28










  • $begingroup$
    @JimmySabater I have added some extra comments for you :)
    $endgroup$
    – bobcliffe
    Mar 24 at 16:16















$begingroup$
thanks for your asnwer. I have a question, how if we replace delta function with heaviside $H(x-1)$? How would solution look now?
$endgroup$
– James
Mar 23 at 19:28




$begingroup$
thanks for your asnwer. I have a question, how if we replace delta function with heaviside $H(x-1)$? How would solution look now?
$endgroup$
– James
Mar 23 at 19:28












$begingroup$
@JimmySabater I have added some extra comments for you :)
$endgroup$
– bobcliffe
Mar 24 at 16:16




$begingroup$
@JimmySabater I have added some extra comments for you :)
$endgroup$
– bobcliffe
Mar 24 at 16:16

















draft saved

draft discarded
















































Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid


  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3159684%2fquestion-about-the-dirac-delta-function%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

How should I support this large drywall patch? Planned maintenance scheduled April 23, 2019 at 00:00UTC (8:00pm US/Eastern) Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara Unicorn Meta Zoo #1: Why another podcast?How do I cover large gaps in drywall?How do I keep drywall around a patch from crumbling?Can I glue a second layer of drywall?How to patch long strip on drywall?Large drywall patch: how to avoid bulging seams?Drywall Mesh Patch vs. Bulge? To remove or not to remove?How to fix this drywall job?Prep drywall before backsplashWhat's the best way to fix this horrible drywall patch job?Drywall patching using 3M Patch Plus Primer

random experiment with two different functions on unit interval Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara Planned maintenance scheduled April 23, 2019 at 00:00UTC (8:00pm US/Eastern)Random variable and probability space notionsRandom Walk with EdgesFinding functions where the increase over a random interval is Poisson distributedNumber of days until dayCan an observed event in fact be of zero probability?Unit random processmodels of coins and uniform distributionHow to get the number of successes given $n$ trials , probability $P$ and a random variable $X$Absorbing Markov chain in a computer. Is “almost every” turned into always convergence in computer executions?Stopped random walk is not uniformly integrable

Lowndes Grove History Architecture References Navigation menu32°48′6″N 79°57′58″W / 32.80167°N 79.96611°W / 32.80167; -79.9661132°48′6″N 79°57′58″W / 32.80167°N 79.96611°W / 32.80167; -79.9661178002500"National Register Information System"Historic houses of South Carolina"Lowndes Grove""+32° 48' 6.00", −79° 57' 58.00""Lowndes Grove, Charleston County (260 St. Margaret St., Charleston)""Lowndes Grove"The Charleston ExpositionIt Happened in South Carolina"Lowndes Grove (House), Saint Margaret Street & Sixth Avenue, Charleston, Charleston County, SC(Photographs)"Plantations of the Carolina Low Countrye