Prove $binomnabinomn-ab-a = binomnbbinomba$ The 2019 Stack Overflow Developer Survey Results Are InShow that $beginalignn choose kk choose m = n choose mn-m choose k-m.endalign$For all positive integers n,m,k where $nge mge k$ , $binom nmbinom mk=binom nkbinom n-kn-m$Prove $binom kmbinom tk=binom tmbinomt-mt-k$Combinatorial Proof that $binomnvphantomdcbinomn-db-c=binomnvphantomddbinomdc$Stuck on combinatorial proof that $binomwp binompm = binomwm binomw-mp-m$The Hexagonal Property of Pascal's TriangleStrehl identity for the sum of cubes of binomial coefficientsShow $binomnkbinomka = binomnabinomn-ak-a$ by block-walking interpretation of Pascal's triangleProve $binomnm binommk = binomnk binomn-km-k$ by counting in two waysTrying to find $sumlimits_k=0^n k binomnk$How to prove Vandermonde's Identity: $sum_k=0^nbinomRkbinomMn-k=binomR+Mn$?Fermat's Combinatorial Identity: How to prove combinatorially?How to prove that $sum_k=0^n binom nk k^2=2^n-2(n^2+n)$Elementary combinatorial questionProve $kbinom nk=n binomk-1 n-1$ algebraically.Combinatorics Question Help; # of ways to choose 4 distinct officials from a city?Proving $binom n-1r-1=sum_k=0^r(-1)^kbinom r k binomn+r-k-1r-k-1$Prove that $sumlimits_k=0^mbinommkbinomnr+k=binomm+nm+r$ using combinatoric arguments.Prove using combinatorics $sumlimits_i=k^n-r+kbinomikbinomn-ir-k=binomn+1r+1$

Does the shape of a die affect the probability of a number being rolled?

How to deal with fear of taking dependencies

If I score a critical hit on an 18 or higher, what are my chances of getting a critical hit if I roll 3d20?

The difference between dialogue marks

Can one be advised by a professor who is very far away?

Aging parents with no investments

What is the motivation for a law requiring 2 parties to consent for recording a conversation

Is flight data recorder erased after every flight?

What do hard-Brexiteers want with respect to the Irish border?

What does ひと匙 mean in this manga and has it been used colloquially?

Should I use my personal e-mail address, or my workplace one, when registering to external websites for work purposes?

Why did Acorn's A3000 have red function keys?

Delete all lines which don't have n characters before delimiter

Time travel alters history but people keep saying nothing's changed

Shouldn't "much" here be used instead of "more"?

Is there a symbol for a right arrow with a square in the middle?

Apparent duplicates between Haynes service instructions and MOT

Which Sci-Fi work first showed weapon of galactic-scale mass destruction?

Do these rules for Critical Successes and Critical Failures seem Fair?

Can a rogue use sneak attack with weapons that have the thrown property even if they are not thrown?

Is three citations per paragraph excessive for undergraduate research paper?

Why not take a picture of a closer black hole?

Is this app Icon Browser Safe/Legit?

A poker game description that does not feel gimmicky



Prove $binomnabinomn-ab-a = binomnbbinomba$



The 2019 Stack Overflow Developer Survey Results Are InShow that $beginalignn choose kk choose m = n choose mn-m choose k-m.endalign$For all positive integers n,m,k where $nge mge k$ , $binom nmbinom mk=binom nkbinom n-kn-m$Prove $binom kmbinom tk=binom tmbinomt-mt-k$Combinatorial Proof that $binomnvphantomdcbinomn-db-c=binomnvphantomddbinomdc$Stuck on combinatorial proof that $binomwp binompm = binomwm binomw-mp-m$The Hexagonal Property of Pascal's TriangleStrehl identity for the sum of cubes of binomial coefficientsShow $binomnkbinomka = binomnabinomn-ak-a$ by block-walking interpretation of Pascal's triangleProve $binomnm binommk = binomnk binomn-km-k$ by counting in two waysTrying to find $sumlimits_k=0^n k binomnk$How to prove Vandermonde's Identity: $sum_k=0^nbinomRkbinomMn-k=binomR+Mn$?Fermat's Combinatorial Identity: How to prove combinatorially?How to prove that $sum_k=0^n binom nk k^2=2^n-2(n^2+n)$Elementary combinatorial questionProve $kbinom nk=n binomk-1 n-1$ algebraically.Combinatorics Question Help; # of ways to choose 4 distinct officials from a city?Proving $binom n-1r-1=sum_k=0^r(-1)^kbinom r k binomn+r-k-1r-k-1$Prove that $sumlimits_k=0^mbinommkbinomnr+k=binomm+nm+r$ using combinatoric arguments.Prove using combinatorics $sumlimits_i=k^n-r+kbinomikbinomn-ir-k=binomn+1r+1$










6












$begingroup$


I want to prove this equation,
$$
binomnabinomn-ab-a = binomnbbinomba
$$
I thought of proving this equation by prove that you are using different ways to count the same set of balls and get the same result. But I'm stuck. Help me please.



(Presumptive) Source: Theoretical Exercise 1.14(a), P19, A First Course in Pr, 8th Ed, by S Ross.










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$
















    6












    $begingroup$


    I want to prove this equation,
    $$
    binomnabinomn-ab-a = binomnbbinomba
    $$
    I thought of proving this equation by prove that you are using different ways to count the same set of balls and get the same result. But I'm stuck. Help me please.



    (Presumptive) Source: Theoretical Exercise 1.14(a), P19, A First Course in Pr, 8th Ed, by S Ross.










    share|cite|improve this question











    $endgroup$














      6












      6








      6


      2



      $begingroup$


      I want to prove this equation,
      $$
      binomnabinomn-ab-a = binomnbbinomba
      $$
      I thought of proving this equation by prove that you are using different ways to count the same set of balls and get the same result. But I'm stuck. Help me please.



      (Presumptive) Source: Theoretical Exercise 1.14(a), P19, A First Course in Pr, 8th Ed, by S Ross.










      share|cite|improve this question











      $endgroup$




      I want to prove this equation,
      $$
      binomnabinomn-ab-a = binomnbbinomba
      $$
      I thought of proving this equation by prove that you are using different ways to count the same set of balls and get the same result. But I'm stuck. Help me please.



      (Presumptive) Source: Theoretical Exercise 1.14(a), P19, A First Course in Pr, 8th Ed, by S Ross.







      combinatorics discrete-mathematics binomial-coefficients






      share|cite|improve this question















      share|cite|improve this question













      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question








      edited Nov 17 '13 at 9:00









      Arjang

      5,65962364




      5,65962364










      asked Oct 21 '13 at 6:44









      More CodeMore Code

      1464




      1464




















          4 Answers
          4






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          8












          $begingroup$

          First comes a bureaucratic answer.



          We have a group of $n$ people. We want to select a committee of $b$ people, and choose $a$ of them to be a steering subcommittee.



          The right-hand side counts the number of ways to pick the committee of $b$ people, and then choose the steering subcommittee from this committee.



          The left-hand side picks the steering subcommittee first, then the rest of the committee.



          Both sides count the same thing, so they are the same.




          Or else we want to choose $b$ people from a class of $n$ to go on a trip. Of these $b$ people, $a$ will ride in the limousine, and the rest in an old bus. We can choose the $b$ people, and then choose the $a$ of them who will ride in the limousine.



          Or else we can choose the $a$ people who will ride in the limousine , and then pick $b-a$ people from the remaining $n-a$ to ride in the bus.






          share|cite|improve this answer











          $endgroup$




















            6












            $begingroup$

            Directly, we find that



            beginalign*
            n choose an - a choose b - a &= fracn!(n - a)!a! frac(n - a)!(n - a - (b - a))! (b - a)! \
            &= fracn!a! frac1(n - b)!(b - a)! \
            &= fracn!(n - b)! b! fracb!(b - a)!a! \
            &= n choose bb choose a
            endalign*



            The third equality follows by multiplying and dividing by $b!$.






            share|cite|improve this answer









            $endgroup$




















              4












              $begingroup$

              These are just two different ways to express the trinomial coefficient $binom na,b-a,n-b$ as a product of two binomial coefficients. The relevant formula (not obviously present on the wikipedia page) is
              $$
              binom nk,l,m = binom nkbinom n-kl qquadtextwhenever $k+l+m=n$,
              $$
              together with the symmetry with respect to $x,y,z$ of the trinomial coefficient, and similarly for binomial coefficients (so that $binom nb=binom nn-b$). The formula above is a consequence of $(X+Y+Z)^n=(X+(Y+Z))^n$, and similar formulas hold for higher multinomial coefficients.






              share|cite|improve this answer









              $endgroup$




















                1












                $begingroup$

                Given $n$ people, we can form a committee of size $b$ in $nchoose b$ ways. Once the committee is formed we can form a sub-committee of size $a$ in $bchoose a$ ways. Thus we can form a committee of size $b$ with a sub-committee of size $a$ in $nchoose bbchoose a$ ways. We can count the same thing by forming the sub-committee first and then forming the committee that contains the sub-committee. Given $n$ people we can form a sub-committee of size $a$ in $nchoose a$ ways. Once the sub-committee is formed we must form the committee of size $b-a$ from the remaining $n-a$ people in $n-achoose b-a$ ways. Thus we can form a sub-committee of size $a$ while forming the committee of size $b-a$ that contains the sub-committee in $nchoose an-achoose b-a$ ways. Hence $nchoose bbchoose a=nchoose an-achoose b-a$.



                This combinatorial identity is known as the Subset-of-a-Subset identity.






                share|cite|improve this answer











                $endgroup$








                • 1




                  $begingroup$
                  Not serious objection: the two procedures are not equivalent, since in the second solution, the soldiers go to war untrained! (Also if you use $a$ as a variable, please put dollars around it.)
                  $endgroup$
                  – Marc van Leeuwen
                  Oct 23 '13 at 12:04











                • $begingroup$
                  Nice catch! I'll edit it to the more familiar committee argument. Thank you.
                  $endgroup$
                  – 1233dfv
                  Oct 25 '13 at 18:12











                Your Answer





                StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
                return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
                StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
                StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
                );
                );
                , "mathjax-editing");

                StackExchange.ready(function()
                var channelOptions =
                tags: "".split(" "),
                id: "69"
                ;
                initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

                StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
                // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
                if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
                StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
                createEditor();
                );

                else
                createEditor();

                );

                function createEditor()
                StackExchange.prepareEditor(
                heartbeatType: 'answer',
                autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
                convertImagesToLinks: true,
                noModals: true,
                showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
                reputationToPostImages: 10,
                bindNavPrevention: true,
                postfix: "",
                imageUploader:
                brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
                contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
                allowUrls: true
                ,
                noCode: true, onDemand: true,
                discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
                ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
                );



                );













                draft saved

                draft discarded


















                StackExchange.ready(
                function ()
                StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f534202%2fprove-binomna-binomn-ab-a-binomnb-binomba%23new-answer', 'question_page');

                );

                Post as a guest















                Required, but never shown

























                4 Answers
                4






                active

                oldest

                votes








                4 Answers
                4






                active

                oldest

                votes









                active

                oldest

                votes






                active

                oldest

                votes









                8












                $begingroup$

                First comes a bureaucratic answer.



                We have a group of $n$ people. We want to select a committee of $b$ people, and choose $a$ of them to be a steering subcommittee.



                The right-hand side counts the number of ways to pick the committee of $b$ people, and then choose the steering subcommittee from this committee.



                The left-hand side picks the steering subcommittee first, then the rest of the committee.



                Both sides count the same thing, so they are the same.




                Or else we want to choose $b$ people from a class of $n$ to go on a trip. Of these $b$ people, $a$ will ride in the limousine, and the rest in an old bus. We can choose the $b$ people, and then choose the $a$ of them who will ride in the limousine.



                Or else we can choose the $a$ people who will ride in the limousine , and then pick $b-a$ people from the remaining $n-a$ to ride in the bus.






                share|cite|improve this answer











                $endgroup$

















                  8












                  $begingroup$

                  First comes a bureaucratic answer.



                  We have a group of $n$ people. We want to select a committee of $b$ people, and choose $a$ of them to be a steering subcommittee.



                  The right-hand side counts the number of ways to pick the committee of $b$ people, and then choose the steering subcommittee from this committee.



                  The left-hand side picks the steering subcommittee first, then the rest of the committee.



                  Both sides count the same thing, so they are the same.




                  Or else we want to choose $b$ people from a class of $n$ to go on a trip. Of these $b$ people, $a$ will ride in the limousine, and the rest in an old bus. We can choose the $b$ people, and then choose the $a$ of them who will ride in the limousine.



                  Or else we can choose the $a$ people who will ride in the limousine , and then pick $b-a$ people from the remaining $n-a$ to ride in the bus.






                  share|cite|improve this answer











                  $endgroup$















                    8












                    8








                    8





                    $begingroup$

                    First comes a bureaucratic answer.



                    We have a group of $n$ people. We want to select a committee of $b$ people, and choose $a$ of them to be a steering subcommittee.



                    The right-hand side counts the number of ways to pick the committee of $b$ people, and then choose the steering subcommittee from this committee.



                    The left-hand side picks the steering subcommittee first, then the rest of the committee.



                    Both sides count the same thing, so they are the same.




                    Or else we want to choose $b$ people from a class of $n$ to go on a trip. Of these $b$ people, $a$ will ride in the limousine, and the rest in an old bus. We can choose the $b$ people, and then choose the $a$ of them who will ride in the limousine.



                    Or else we can choose the $a$ people who will ride in the limousine , and then pick $b-a$ people from the remaining $n-a$ to ride in the bus.






                    share|cite|improve this answer











                    $endgroup$



                    First comes a bureaucratic answer.



                    We have a group of $n$ people. We want to select a committee of $b$ people, and choose $a$ of them to be a steering subcommittee.



                    The right-hand side counts the number of ways to pick the committee of $b$ people, and then choose the steering subcommittee from this committee.



                    The left-hand side picks the steering subcommittee first, then the rest of the committee.



                    Both sides count the same thing, so they are the same.




                    Or else we want to choose $b$ people from a class of $n$ to go on a trip. Of these $b$ people, $a$ will ride in the limousine, and the rest in an old bus. We can choose the $b$ people, and then choose the $a$ of them who will ride in the limousine.



                    Or else we can choose the $a$ people who will ride in the limousine , and then pick $b-a$ people from the remaining $n-a$ to ride in the bus.







                    share|cite|improve this answer














                    share|cite|improve this answer



                    share|cite|improve this answer








                    edited Oct 23 '13 at 19:38

























                    answered Oct 21 '13 at 6:50









                    André NicolasAndré Nicolas

                    455k36432821




                    455k36432821





















                        6












                        $begingroup$

                        Directly, we find that



                        beginalign*
                        n choose an - a choose b - a &= fracn!(n - a)!a! frac(n - a)!(n - a - (b - a))! (b - a)! \
                        &= fracn!a! frac1(n - b)!(b - a)! \
                        &= fracn!(n - b)! b! fracb!(b - a)!a! \
                        &= n choose bb choose a
                        endalign*



                        The third equality follows by multiplying and dividing by $b!$.






                        share|cite|improve this answer









                        $endgroup$

















                          6












                          $begingroup$

                          Directly, we find that



                          beginalign*
                          n choose an - a choose b - a &= fracn!(n - a)!a! frac(n - a)!(n - a - (b - a))! (b - a)! \
                          &= fracn!a! frac1(n - b)!(b - a)! \
                          &= fracn!(n - b)! b! fracb!(b - a)!a! \
                          &= n choose bb choose a
                          endalign*



                          The third equality follows by multiplying and dividing by $b!$.






                          share|cite|improve this answer









                          $endgroup$















                            6












                            6








                            6





                            $begingroup$

                            Directly, we find that



                            beginalign*
                            n choose an - a choose b - a &= fracn!(n - a)!a! frac(n - a)!(n - a - (b - a))! (b - a)! \
                            &= fracn!a! frac1(n - b)!(b - a)! \
                            &= fracn!(n - b)! b! fracb!(b - a)!a! \
                            &= n choose bb choose a
                            endalign*



                            The third equality follows by multiplying and dividing by $b!$.






                            share|cite|improve this answer









                            $endgroup$



                            Directly, we find that



                            beginalign*
                            n choose an - a choose b - a &= fracn!(n - a)!a! frac(n - a)!(n - a - (b - a))! (b - a)! \
                            &= fracn!a! frac1(n - b)!(b - a)! \
                            &= fracn!(n - b)! b! fracb!(b - a)!a! \
                            &= n choose bb choose a
                            endalign*



                            The third equality follows by multiplying and dividing by $b!$.







                            share|cite|improve this answer












                            share|cite|improve this answer



                            share|cite|improve this answer










                            answered Oct 21 '13 at 6:47







                            user61527




























                                4












                                $begingroup$

                                These are just two different ways to express the trinomial coefficient $binom na,b-a,n-b$ as a product of two binomial coefficients. The relevant formula (not obviously present on the wikipedia page) is
                                $$
                                binom nk,l,m = binom nkbinom n-kl qquadtextwhenever $k+l+m=n$,
                                $$
                                together with the symmetry with respect to $x,y,z$ of the trinomial coefficient, and similarly for binomial coefficients (so that $binom nb=binom nn-b$). The formula above is a consequence of $(X+Y+Z)^n=(X+(Y+Z))^n$, and similar formulas hold for higher multinomial coefficients.






                                share|cite|improve this answer









                                $endgroup$

















                                  4












                                  $begingroup$

                                  These are just two different ways to express the trinomial coefficient $binom na,b-a,n-b$ as a product of two binomial coefficients. The relevant formula (not obviously present on the wikipedia page) is
                                  $$
                                  binom nk,l,m = binom nkbinom n-kl qquadtextwhenever $k+l+m=n$,
                                  $$
                                  together with the symmetry with respect to $x,y,z$ of the trinomial coefficient, and similarly for binomial coefficients (so that $binom nb=binom nn-b$). The formula above is a consequence of $(X+Y+Z)^n=(X+(Y+Z))^n$, and similar formulas hold for higher multinomial coefficients.






                                  share|cite|improve this answer









                                  $endgroup$















                                    4












                                    4








                                    4





                                    $begingroup$

                                    These are just two different ways to express the trinomial coefficient $binom na,b-a,n-b$ as a product of two binomial coefficients. The relevant formula (not obviously present on the wikipedia page) is
                                    $$
                                    binom nk,l,m = binom nkbinom n-kl qquadtextwhenever $k+l+m=n$,
                                    $$
                                    together with the symmetry with respect to $x,y,z$ of the trinomial coefficient, and similarly for binomial coefficients (so that $binom nb=binom nn-b$). The formula above is a consequence of $(X+Y+Z)^n=(X+(Y+Z))^n$, and similar formulas hold for higher multinomial coefficients.






                                    share|cite|improve this answer









                                    $endgroup$



                                    These are just two different ways to express the trinomial coefficient $binom na,b-a,n-b$ as a product of two binomial coefficients. The relevant formula (not obviously present on the wikipedia page) is
                                    $$
                                    binom nk,l,m = binom nkbinom n-kl qquadtextwhenever $k+l+m=n$,
                                    $$
                                    together with the symmetry with respect to $x,y,z$ of the trinomial coefficient, and similarly for binomial coefficients (so that $binom nb=binom nn-b$). The formula above is a consequence of $(X+Y+Z)^n=(X+(Y+Z))^n$, and similar formulas hold for higher multinomial coefficients.







                                    share|cite|improve this answer












                                    share|cite|improve this answer



                                    share|cite|improve this answer










                                    answered Oct 23 '13 at 12:17









                                    Marc van LeeuwenMarc van Leeuwen

                                    88.7k5111230




                                    88.7k5111230





















                                        1












                                        $begingroup$

                                        Given $n$ people, we can form a committee of size $b$ in $nchoose b$ ways. Once the committee is formed we can form a sub-committee of size $a$ in $bchoose a$ ways. Thus we can form a committee of size $b$ with a sub-committee of size $a$ in $nchoose bbchoose a$ ways. We can count the same thing by forming the sub-committee first and then forming the committee that contains the sub-committee. Given $n$ people we can form a sub-committee of size $a$ in $nchoose a$ ways. Once the sub-committee is formed we must form the committee of size $b-a$ from the remaining $n-a$ people in $n-achoose b-a$ ways. Thus we can form a sub-committee of size $a$ while forming the committee of size $b-a$ that contains the sub-committee in $nchoose an-achoose b-a$ ways. Hence $nchoose bbchoose a=nchoose an-achoose b-a$.



                                        This combinatorial identity is known as the Subset-of-a-Subset identity.






                                        share|cite|improve this answer











                                        $endgroup$








                                        • 1




                                          $begingroup$
                                          Not serious objection: the two procedures are not equivalent, since in the second solution, the soldiers go to war untrained! (Also if you use $a$ as a variable, please put dollars around it.)
                                          $endgroup$
                                          – Marc van Leeuwen
                                          Oct 23 '13 at 12:04











                                        • $begingroup$
                                          Nice catch! I'll edit it to the more familiar committee argument. Thank you.
                                          $endgroup$
                                          – 1233dfv
                                          Oct 25 '13 at 18:12















                                        1












                                        $begingroup$

                                        Given $n$ people, we can form a committee of size $b$ in $nchoose b$ ways. Once the committee is formed we can form a sub-committee of size $a$ in $bchoose a$ ways. Thus we can form a committee of size $b$ with a sub-committee of size $a$ in $nchoose bbchoose a$ ways. We can count the same thing by forming the sub-committee first and then forming the committee that contains the sub-committee. Given $n$ people we can form a sub-committee of size $a$ in $nchoose a$ ways. Once the sub-committee is formed we must form the committee of size $b-a$ from the remaining $n-a$ people in $n-achoose b-a$ ways. Thus we can form a sub-committee of size $a$ while forming the committee of size $b-a$ that contains the sub-committee in $nchoose an-achoose b-a$ ways. Hence $nchoose bbchoose a=nchoose an-achoose b-a$.



                                        This combinatorial identity is known as the Subset-of-a-Subset identity.






                                        share|cite|improve this answer











                                        $endgroup$








                                        • 1




                                          $begingroup$
                                          Not serious objection: the two procedures are not equivalent, since in the second solution, the soldiers go to war untrained! (Also if you use $a$ as a variable, please put dollars around it.)
                                          $endgroup$
                                          – Marc van Leeuwen
                                          Oct 23 '13 at 12:04











                                        • $begingroup$
                                          Nice catch! I'll edit it to the more familiar committee argument. Thank you.
                                          $endgroup$
                                          – 1233dfv
                                          Oct 25 '13 at 18:12













                                        1












                                        1








                                        1





                                        $begingroup$

                                        Given $n$ people, we can form a committee of size $b$ in $nchoose b$ ways. Once the committee is formed we can form a sub-committee of size $a$ in $bchoose a$ ways. Thus we can form a committee of size $b$ with a sub-committee of size $a$ in $nchoose bbchoose a$ ways. We can count the same thing by forming the sub-committee first and then forming the committee that contains the sub-committee. Given $n$ people we can form a sub-committee of size $a$ in $nchoose a$ ways. Once the sub-committee is formed we must form the committee of size $b-a$ from the remaining $n-a$ people in $n-achoose b-a$ ways. Thus we can form a sub-committee of size $a$ while forming the committee of size $b-a$ that contains the sub-committee in $nchoose an-achoose b-a$ ways. Hence $nchoose bbchoose a=nchoose an-achoose b-a$.



                                        This combinatorial identity is known as the Subset-of-a-Subset identity.






                                        share|cite|improve this answer











                                        $endgroup$



                                        Given $n$ people, we can form a committee of size $b$ in $nchoose b$ ways. Once the committee is formed we can form a sub-committee of size $a$ in $bchoose a$ ways. Thus we can form a committee of size $b$ with a sub-committee of size $a$ in $nchoose bbchoose a$ ways. We can count the same thing by forming the sub-committee first and then forming the committee that contains the sub-committee. Given $n$ people we can form a sub-committee of size $a$ in $nchoose a$ ways. Once the sub-committee is formed we must form the committee of size $b-a$ from the remaining $n-a$ people in $n-achoose b-a$ ways. Thus we can form a sub-committee of size $a$ while forming the committee of size $b-a$ that contains the sub-committee in $nchoose an-achoose b-a$ ways. Hence $nchoose bbchoose a=nchoose an-achoose b-a$.



                                        This combinatorial identity is known as the Subset-of-a-Subset identity.







                                        share|cite|improve this answer














                                        share|cite|improve this answer



                                        share|cite|improve this answer








                                        edited Oct 25 '13 at 18:09

























                                        answered Oct 23 '13 at 1:15









                                        1233dfv1233dfv

                                        4,2031326




                                        4,2031326







                                        • 1




                                          $begingroup$
                                          Not serious objection: the two procedures are not equivalent, since in the second solution, the soldiers go to war untrained! (Also if you use $a$ as a variable, please put dollars around it.)
                                          $endgroup$
                                          – Marc van Leeuwen
                                          Oct 23 '13 at 12:04











                                        • $begingroup$
                                          Nice catch! I'll edit it to the more familiar committee argument. Thank you.
                                          $endgroup$
                                          – 1233dfv
                                          Oct 25 '13 at 18:12












                                        • 1




                                          $begingroup$
                                          Not serious objection: the two procedures are not equivalent, since in the second solution, the soldiers go to war untrained! (Also if you use $a$ as a variable, please put dollars around it.)
                                          $endgroup$
                                          – Marc van Leeuwen
                                          Oct 23 '13 at 12:04











                                        • $begingroup$
                                          Nice catch! I'll edit it to the more familiar committee argument. Thank you.
                                          $endgroup$
                                          – 1233dfv
                                          Oct 25 '13 at 18:12







                                        1




                                        1




                                        $begingroup$
                                        Not serious objection: the two procedures are not equivalent, since in the second solution, the soldiers go to war untrained! (Also if you use $a$ as a variable, please put dollars around it.)
                                        $endgroup$
                                        – Marc van Leeuwen
                                        Oct 23 '13 at 12:04





                                        $begingroup$
                                        Not serious objection: the two procedures are not equivalent, since in the second solution, the soldiers go to war untrained! (Also if you use $a$ as a variable, please put dollars around it.)
                                        $endgroup$
                                        – Marc van Leeuwen
                                        Oct 23 '13 at 12:04













                                        $begingroup$
                                        Nice catch! I'll edit it to the more familiar committee argument. Thank you.
                                        $endgroup$
                                        – 1233dfv
                                        Oct 25 '13 at 18:12




                                        $begingroup$
                                        Nice catch! I'll edit it to the more familiar committee argument. Thank you.
                                        $endgroup$
                                        – 1233dfv
                                        Oct 25 '13 at 18:12

















                                        draft saved

                                        draft discarded
















































                                        Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


                                        • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                                        But avoid


                                        • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                                        • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

                                        Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


                                        To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                                        draft saved


                                        draft discarded














                                        StackExchange.ready(
                                        function ()
                                        StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f534202%2fprove-binomna-binomn-ab-a-binomnb-binomba%23new-answer', 'question_page');

                                        );

                                        Post as a guest















                                        Required, but never shown





















































                                        Required, but never shown














                                        Required, but never shown












                                        Required, but never shown







                                        Required, but never shown

































                                        Required, but never shown














                                        Required, but never shown












                                        Required, but never shown







                                        Required, but never shown







                                        Popular posts from this blog

                                        Solar Wings Breeze Design and development Specifications (Breeze) References Navigation menu1368-485X"Hang glider: Breeze (Solar Wings)"e

                                        Kathakali Contents Etymology and nomenclature History Repertoire Songs and musical instruments Traditional plays Styles: Sampradayam Training centers and awards Relationship to other dance forms See also Notes References External links Navigation menueThe Illustrated Encyclopedia of Hinduism: A-MSouth Asian Folklore: An EncyclopediaRoutledge International Encyclopedia of Women: Global Women's Issues and KnowledgeKathakali Dance-drama: Where Gods and Demons Come to PlayKathakali Dance-drama: Where Gods and Demons Come to PlayKathakali Dance-drama: Where Gods and Demons Come to Play10.1353/atj.2005.0004The Illustrated Encyclopedia of Hinduism: A-MEncyclopedia of HinduismKathakali Dance-drama: Where Gods and Demons Come to PlaySonic Liturgy: Ritual and Music in Hindu Tradition"The Mirror of Gesture"Kathakali Dance-drama: Where Gods and Demons Come to Play"Kathakali"Indian Theatre: Traditions of PerformanceIndian Theatre: Traditions of PerformanceIndian Theatre: Traditions of PerformanceIndian Theatre: Traditions of PerformanceMedieval Indian Literature: An AnthologyThe Oxford Companion to Indian TheatreSouth Asian Folklore: An Encyclopedia : Afghanistan, Bangladesh, India, Nepal, Pakistan, Sri LankaThe Rise of Performance Studies: Rethinking Richard Schechner's Broad SpectrumIndian Theatre: Traditions of PerformanceModern Asian Theatre and Performance 1900-2000Critical Theory and PerformanceBetween Theater and AnthropologyKathakali603847011Indian Theatre: Traditions of PerformanceIndian Theatre: Traditions of PerformanceIndian Theatre: Traditions of PerformanceBetween Theater and AnthropologyBetween Theater and AnthropologyNambeesan Smaraka AwardsArchivedThe Cambridge Guide to TheatreRoutledge International Encyclopedia of Women: Global Women's Issues and KnowledgeThe Garland Encyclopedia of World Music: South Asia : the Indian subcontinentThe Ethos of Noh: Actors and Their Art10.2307/1145740By Means of Performance: Intercultural Studies of Theatre and Ritual10.1017/s204912550000100xReconceiving the Renaissance: A Critical ReaderPerformance TheoryListening to Theatre: The Aural Dimension of Beijing Opera10.2307/1146013Kathakali: The Art of the Non-WorldlyOn KathakaliKathakali, the dance theatreThe Kathakali Complex: Performance & StructureKathakali Dance-Drama: Where Gods and Demons Come to Play10.1093/obo/9780195399318-0071Drama and Ritual of Early Hinduism"In the Shadow of Hollywood Orientalism: Authentic East Indian Dancing"10.1080/08949460490274013Sanskrit Play Production in Ancient IndiaIndian Music: History and StructureBharata, the Nāṭyaśāstra233639306Table of Contents2238067286469807Dance In Indian Painting10.2307/32047833204783Kathakali Dance-Theatre: A Visual Narrative of Sacred Indian MimeIndian Classical Dance: The Renaissance and BeyondKathakali: an indigenous art-form of Keralaeee

                                        Method to test if a number is a perfect power? Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara Planned maintenance scheduled April 23, 2019 at 00:00UTC (8:00pm US/Eastern)Detecting perfect squares faster than by extracting square rooteffective way to get the integer sequence A181392 from oeisA rarely mentioned fact about perfect powersHow many numbers such $n$ are there that $n<100,lfloorsqrtn rfloor mid n$Check perfect squareness by modulo division against multiple basesFor what pair of integers $(a,b)$ is $3^a + 7^b$ a perfect square.Do there exist any positive integers $n$ such that $lfloore^nrfloor$ is a perfect power? What is the probability that one exists?finding perfect power factors of an integerProve that the sequence contains a perfect square for any natural number $m $ in the domain of $f$ .Counting Perfect Powers