Prove $binomnabinomn-ab-a = binomnbbinomba$ The 2019 Stack Overflow Developer Survey Results Are InShow that $beginalignn choose kk choose m = n choose mn-m choose k-m.endalign$For all positive integers n,m,k where $nge mge k$ , $binom nmbinom mk=binom nkbinom n-kn-m$Prove $binom kmbinom tk=binom tmbinomt-mt-k$Combinatorial Proof that $binomnvphantomdcbinomn-db-c=binomnvphantomddbinomdc$Stuck on combinatorial proof that $binomwp binompm = binomwm binomw-mp-m$The Hexagonal Property of Pascal's TriangleStrehl identity for the sum of cubes of binomial coefficientsShow $binomnkbinomka = binomnabinomn-ak-a$ by block-walking interpretation of Pascal's triangleProve $binomnm binommk = binomnk binomn-km-k$ by counting in two waysTrying to find $sumlimits_k=0^n k binomnk$How to prove Vandermonde's Identity: $sum_k=0^nbinomRkbinomMn-k=binomR+Mn$?Fermat's Combinatorial Identity: How to prove combinatorially?How to prove that $sum_k=0^n binom nk k^2=2^n-2(n^2+n)$Elementary combinatorial questionProve $kbinom nk=n binomk-1 n-1$ algebraically.Combinatorics Question Help; # of ways to choose 4 distinct officials from a city?Proving $binom n-1r-1=sum_k=0^r(-1)^kbinom r k binomn+r-k-1r-k-1$Prove that $sumlimits_k=0^mbinommkbinomnr+k=binomm+nm+r$ using combinatoric arguments.Prove using combinatorics $sumlimits_i=k^n-r+kbinomikbinomn-ir-k=binomn+1r+1$

Does the shape of a die affect the probability of a number being rolled?

How to deal with fear of taking dependencies

If I score a critical hit on an 18 or higher, what are my chances of getting a critical hit if I roll 3d20?

The difference between dialogue marks

Can one be advised by a professor who is very far away?

Aging parents with no investments

What is the motivation for a law requiring 2 parties to consent for recording a conversation

Is flight data recorder erased after every flight?

What do hard-Brexiteers want with respect to the Irish border?

What does ひと匙 mean in this manga and has it been used colloquially?

Should I use my personal e-mail address, or my workplace one, when registering to external websites for work purposes?

Why did Acorn's A3000 have red function keys?

Delete all lines which don't have n characters before delimiter

Time travel alters history but people keep saying nothing's changed

Shouldn't "much" here be used instead of "more"?

Is there a symbol for a right arrow with a square in the middle?

Apparent duplicates between Haynes service instructions and MOT

Which Sci-Fi work first showed weapon of galactic-scale mass destruction?

Do these rules for Critical Successes and Critical Failures seem Fair?

Can a rogue use sneak attack with weapons that have the thrown property even if they are not thrown?

Is three citations per paragraph excessive for undergraduate research paper?

Why not take a picture of a closer black hole?

Is this app Icon Browser Safe/Legit?

A poker game description that does not feel gimmicky



Prove $binomnabinomn-ab-a = binomnbbinomba$



The 2019 Stack Overflow Developer Survey Results Are InShow that $beginalignn choose kk choose m = n choose mn-m choose k-m.endalign$For all positive integers n,m,k where $nge mge k$ , $binom nmbinom mk=binom nkbinom n-kn-m$Prove $binom kmbinom tk=binom tmbinomt-mt-k$Combinatorial Proof that $binomnvphantomdcbinomn-db-c=binomnvphantomddbinomdc$Stuck on combinatorial proof that $binomwp binompm = binomwm binomw-mp-m$The Hexagonal Property of Pascal's TriangleStrehl identity for the sum of cubes of binomial coefficientsShow $binomnkbinomka = binomnabinomn-ak-a$ by block-walking interpretation of Pascal's triangleProve $binomnm binommk = binomnk binomn-km-k$ by counting in two waysTrying to find $sumlimits_k=0^n k binomnk$How to prove Vandermonde's Identity: $sum_k=0^nbinomRkbinomMn-k=binomR+Mn$?Fermat's Combinatorial Identity: How to prove combinatorially?How to prove that $sum_k=0^n binom nk k^2=2^n-2(n^2+n)$Elementary combinatorial questionProve $kbinom nk=n binomk-1 n-1$ algebraically.Combinatorics Question Help; # of ways to choose 4 distinct officials from a city?Proving $binom n-1r-1=sum_k=0^r(-1)^kbinom r k binomn+r-k-1r-k-1$Prove that $sumlimits_k=0^mbinommkbinomnr+k=binomm+nm+r$ using combinatoric arguments.Prove using combinatorics $sumlimits_i=k^n-r+kbinomikbinomn-ir-k=binomn+1r+1$










6












$begingroup$


I want to prove this equation,
$$
binomnabinomn-ab-a = binomnbbinomba
$$
I thought of proving this equation by prove that you are using different ways to count the same set of balls and get the same result. But I'm stuck. Help me please.



(Presumptive) Source: Theoretical Exercise 1.14(a), P19, A First Course in Pr, 8th Ed, by S Ross.










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$
















    6












    $begingroup$


    I want to prove this equation,
    $$
    binomnabinomn-ab-a = binomnbbinomba
    $$
    I thought of proving this equation by prove that you are using different ways to count the same set of balls and get the same result. But I'm stuck. Help me please.



    (Presumptive) Source: Theoretical Exercise 1.14(a), P19, A First Course in Pr, 8th Ed, by S Ross.










    share|cite|improve this question











    $endgroup$














      6












      6








      6


      2



      $begingroup$


      I want to prove this equation,
      $$
      binomnabinomn-ab-a = binomnbbinomba
      $$
      I thought of proving this equation by prove that you are using different ways to count the same set of balls and get the same result. But I'm stuck. Help me please.



      (Presumptive) Source: Theoretical Exercise 1.14(a), P19, A First Course in Pr, 8th Ed, by S Ross.










      share|cite|improve this question











      $endgroup$




      I want to prove this equation,
      $$
      binomnabinomn-ab-a = binomnbbinomba
      $$
      I thought of proving this equation by prove that you are using different ways to count the same set of balls and get the same result. But I'm stuck. Help me please.



      (Presumptive) Source: Theoretical Exercise 1.14(a), P19, A First Course in Pr, 8th Ed, by S Ross.







      combinatorics discrete-mathematics binomial-coefficients






      share|cite|improve this question















      share|cite|improve this question













      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question








      edited Nov 17 '13 at 9:00









      Arjang

      5,65962364




      5,65962364










      asked Oct 21 '13 at 6:44









      More CodeMore Code

      1464




      1464




















          4 Answers
          4






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          8












          $begingroup$

          First comes a bureaucratic answer.



          We have a group of $n$ people. We want to select a committee of $b$ people, and choose $a$ of them to be a steering subcommittee.



          The right-hand side counts the number of ways to pick the committee of $b$ people, and then choose the steering subcommittee from this committee.



          The left-hand side picks the steering subcommittee first, then the rest of the committee.



          Both sides count the same thing, so they are the same.




          Or else we want to choose $b$ people from a class of $n$ to go on a trip. Of these $b$ people, $a$ will ride in the limousine, and the rest in an old bus. We can choose the $b$ people, and then choose the $a$ of them who will ride in the limousine.



          Or else we can choose the $a$ people who will ride in the limousine , and then pick $b-a$ people from the remaining $n-a$ to ride in the bus.






          share|cite|improve this answer











          $endgroup$




















            6












            $begingroup$

            Directly, we find that



            beginalign*
            n choose an - a choose b - a &= fracn!(n - a)!a! frac(n - a)!(n - a - (b - a))! (b - a)! \
            &= fracn!a! frac1(n - b)!(b - a)! \
            &= fracn!(n - b)! b! fracb!(b - a)!a! \
            &= n choose bb choose a
            endalign*



            The third equality follows by multiplying and dividing by $b!$.






            share|cite|improve this answer









            $endgroup$




















              4












              $begingroup$

              These are just two different ways to express the trinomial coefficient $binom na,b-a,n-b$ as a product of two binomial coefficients. The relevant formula (not obviously present on the wikipedia page) is
              $$
              binom nk,l,m = binom nkbinom n-kl qquadtextwhenever $k+l+m=n$,
              $$
              together with the symmetry with respect to $x,y,z$ of the trinomial coefficient, and similarly for binomial coefficients (so that $binom nb=binom nn-b$). The formula above is a consequence of $(X+Y+Z)^n=(X+(Y+Z))^n$, and similar formulas hold for higher multinomial coefficients.






              share|cite|improve this answer









              $endgroup$




















                1












                $begingroup$

                Given $n$ people, we can form a committee of size $b$ in $nchoose b$ ways. Once the committee is formed we can form a sub-committee of size $a$ in $bchoose a$ ways. Thus we can form a committee of size $b$ with a sub-committee of size $a$ in $nchoose bbchoose a$ ways. We can count the same thing by forming the sub-committee first and then forming the committee that contains the sub-committee. Given $n$ people we can form a sub-committee of size $a$ in $nchoose a$ ways. Once the sub-committee is formed we must form the committee of size $b-a$ from the remaining $n-a$ people in $n-achoose b-a$ ways. Thus we can form a sub-committee of size $a$ while forming the committee of size $b-a$ that contains the sub-committee in $nchoose an-achoose b-a$ ways. Hence $nchoose bbchoose a=nchoose an-achoose b-a$.



                This combinatorial identity is known as the Subset-of-a-Subset identity.






                share|cite|improve this answer











                $endgroup$








                • 1




                  $begingroup$
                  Not serious objection: the two procedures are not equivalent, since in the second solution, the soldiers go to war untrained! (Also if you use $a$ as a variable, please put dollars around it.)
                  $endgroup$
                  – Marc van Leeuwen
                  Oct 23 '13 at 12:04











                • $begingroup$
                  Nice catch! I'll edit it to the more familiar committee argument. Thank you.
                  $endgroup$
                  – 1233dfv
                  Oct 25 '13 at 18:12











                Your Answer





                StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
                return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
                StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
                StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
                );
                );
                , "mathjax-editing");

                StackExchange.ready(function()
                var channelOptions =
                tags: "".split(" "),
                id: "69"
                ;
                initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

                StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
                // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
                if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
                StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
                createEditor();
                );

                else
                createEditor();

                );

                function createEditor()
                StackExchange.prepareEditor(
                heartbeatType: 'answer',
                autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
                convertImagesToLinks: true,
                noModals: true,
                showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
                reputationToPostImages: 10,
                bindNavPrevention: true,
                postfix: "",
                imageUploader:
                brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
                contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
                allowUrls: true
                ,
                noCode: true, onDemand: true,
                discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
                ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
                );



                );













                draft saved

                draft discarded


















                StackExchange.ready(
                function ()
                StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f534202%2fprove-binomna-binomn-ab-a-binomnb-binomba%23new-answer', 'question_page');

                );

                Post as a guest















                Required, but never shown

























                4 Answers
                4






                active

                oldest

                votes








                4 Answers
                4






                active

                oldest

                votes









                active

                oldest

                votes






                active

                oldest

                votes









                8












                $begingroup$

                First comes a bureaucratic answer.



                We have a group of $n$ people. We want to select a committee of $b$ people, and choose $a$ of them to be a steering subcommittee.



                The right-hand side counts the number of ways to pick the committee of $b$ people, and then choose the steering subcommittee from this committee.



                The left-hand side picks the steering subcommittee first, then the rest of the committee.



                Both sides count the same thing, so they are the same.




                Or else we want to choose $b$ people from a class of $n$ to go on a trip. Of these $b$ people, $a$ will ride in the limousine, and the rest in an old bus. We can choose the $b$ people, and then choose the $a$ of them who will ride in the limousine.



                Or else we can choose the $a$ people who will ride in the limousine , and then pick $b-a$ people from the remaining $n-a$ to ride in the bus.






                share|cite|improve this answer











                $endgroup$

















                  8












                  $begingroup$

                  First comes a bureaucratic answer.



                  We have a group of $n$ people. We want to select a committee of $b$ people, and choose $a$ of them to be a steering subcommittee.



                  The right-hand side counts the number of ways to pick the committee of $b$ people, and then choose the steering subcommittee from this committee.



                  The left-hand side picks the steering subcommittee first, then the rest of the committee.



                  Both sides count the same thing, so they are the same.




                  Or else we want to choose $b$ people from a class of $n$ to go on a trip. Of these $b$ people, $a$ will ride in the limousine, and the rest in an old bus. We can choose the $b$ people, and then choose the $a$ of them who will ride in the limousine.



                  Or else we can choose the $a$ people who will ride in the limousine , and then pick $b-a$ people from the remaining $n-a$ to ride in the bus.






                  share|cite|improve this answer











                  $endgroup$















                    8












                    8








                    8





                    $begingroup$

                    First comes a bureaucratic answer.



                    We have a group of $n$ people. We want to select a committee of $b$ people, and choose $a$ of them to be a steering subcommittee.



                    The right-hand side counts the number of ways to pick the committee of $b$ people, and then choose the steering subcommittee from this committee.



                    The left-hand side picks the steering subcommittee first, then the rest of the committee.



                    Both sides count the same thing, so they are the same.




                    Or else we want to choose $b$ people from a class of $n$ to go on a trip. Of these $b$ people, $a$ will ride in the limousine, and the rest in an old bus. We can choose the $b$ people, and then choose the $a$ of them who will ride in the limousine.



                    Or else we can choose the $a$ people who will ride in the limousine , and then pick $b-a$ people from the remaining $n-a$ to ride in the bus.






                    share|cite|improve this answer











                    $endgroup$



                    First comes a bureaucratic answer.



                    We have a group of $n$ people. We want to select a committee of $b$ people, and choose $a$ of them to be a steering subcommittee.



                    The right-hand side counts the number of ways to pick the committee of $b$ people, and then choose the steering subcommittee from this committee.



                    The left-hand side picks the steering subcommittee first, then the rest of the committee.



                    Both sides count the same thing, so they are the same.




                    Or else we want to choose $b$ people from a class of $n$ to go on a trip. Of these $b$ people, $a$ will ride in the limousine, and the rest in an old bus. We can choose the $b$ people, and then choose the $a$ of them who will ride in the limousine.



                    Or else we can choose the $a$ people who will ride in the limousine , and then pick $b-a$ people from the remaining $n-a$ to ride in the bus.







                    share|cite|improve this answer














                    share|cite|improve this answer



                    share|cite|improve this answer








                    edited Oct 23 '13 at 19:38

























                    answered Oct 21 '13 at 6:50









                    André NicolasAndré Nicolas

                    455k36432821




                    455k36432821





















                        6












                        $begingroup$

                        Directly, we find that



                        beginalign*
                        n choose an - a choose b - a &= fracn!(n - a)!a! frac(n - a)!(n - a - (b - a))! (b - a)! \
                        &= fracn!a! frac1(n - b)!(b - a)! \
                        &= fracn!(n - b)! b! fracb!(b - a)!a! \
                        &= n choose bb choose a
                        endalign*



                        The third equality follows by multiplying and dividing by $b!$.






                        share|cite|improve this answer









                        $endgroup$

















                          6












                          $begingroup$

                          Directly, we find that



                          beginalign*
                          n choose an - a choose b - a &= fracn!(n - a)!a! frac(n - a)!(n - a - (b - a))! (b - a)! \
                          &= fracn!a! frac1(n - b)!(b - a)! \
                          &= fracn!(n - b)! b! fracb!(b - a)!a! \
                          &= n choose bb choose a
                          endalign*



                          The third equality follows by multiplying and dividing by $b!$.






                          share|cite|improve this answer









                          $endgroup$















                            6












                            6








                            6





                            $begingroup$

                            Directly, we find that



                            beginalign*
                            n choose an - a choose b - a &= fracn!(n - a)!a! frac(n - a)!(n - a - (b - a))! (b - a)! \
                            &= fracn!a! frac1(n - b)!(b - a)! \
                            &= fracn!(n - b)! b! fracb!(b - a)!a! \
                            &= n choose bb choose a
                            endalign*



                            The third equality follows by multiplying and dividing by $b!$.






                            share|cite|improve this answer









                            $endgroup$



                            Directly, we find that



                            beginalign*
                            n choose an - a choose b - a &= fracn!(n - a)!a! frac(n - a)!(n - a - (b - a))! (b - a)! \
                            &= fracn!a! frac1(n - b)!(b - a)! \
                            &= fracn!(n - b)! b! fracb!(b - a)!a! \
                            &= n choose bb choose a
                            endalign*



                            The third equality follows by multiplying and dividing by $b!$.







                            share|cite|improve this answer












                            share|cite|improve this answer



                            share|cite|improve this answer










                            answered Oct 21 '13 at 6:47







                            user61527




























                                4












                                $begingroup$

                                These are just two different ways to express the trinomial coefficient $binom na,b-a,n-b$ as a product of two binomial coefficients. The relevant formula (not obviously present on the wikipedia page) is
                                $$
                                binom nk,l,m = binom nkbinom n-kl qquadtextwhenever $k+l+m=n$,
                                $$
                                together with the symmetry with respect to $x,y,z$ of the trinomial coefficient, and similarly for binomial coefficients (so that $binom nb=binom nn-b$). The formula above is a consequence of $(X+Y+Z)^n=(X+(Y+Z))^n$, and similar formulas hold for higher multinomial coefficients.






                                share|cite|improve this answer









                                $endgroup$

















                                  4












                                  $begingroup$

                                  These are just two different ways to express the trinomial coefficient $binom na,b-a,n-b$ as a product of two binomial coefficients. The relevant formula (not obviously present on the wikipedia page) is
                                  $$
                                  binom nk,l,m = binom nkbinom n-kl qquadtextwhenever $k+l+m=n$,
                                  $$
                                  together with the symmetry with respect to $x,y,z$ of the trinomial coefficient, and similarly for binomial coefficients (so that $binom nb=binom nn-b$). The formula above is a consequence of $(X+Y+Z)^n=(X+(Y+Z))^n$, and similar formulas hold for higher multinomial coefficients.






                                  share|cite|improve this answer









                                  $endgroup$















                                    4












                                    4








                                    4





                                    $begingroup$

                                    These are just two different ways to express the trinomial coefficient $binom na,b-a,n-b$ as a product of two binomial coefficients. The relevant formula (not obviously present on the wikipedia page) is
                                    $$
                                    binom nk,l,m = binom nkbinom n-kl qquadtextwhenever $k+l+m=n$,
                                    $$
                                    together with the symmetry with respect to $x,y,z$ of the trinomial coefficient, and similarly for binomial coefficients (so that $binom nb=binom nn-b$). The formula above is a consequence of $(X+Y+Z)^n=(X+(Y+Z))^n$, and similar formulas hold for higher multinomial coefficients.






                                    share|cite|improve this answer









                                    $endgroup$



                                    These are just two different ways to express the trinomial coefficient $binom na,b-a,n-b$ as a product of two binomial coefficients. The relevant formula (not obviously present on the wikipedia page) is
                                    $$
                                    binom nk,l,m = binom nkbinom n-kl qquadtextwhenever $k+l+m=n$,
                                    $$
                                    together with the symmetry with respect to $x,y,z$ of the trinomial coefficient, and similarly for binomial coefficients (so that $binom nb=binom nn-b$). The formula above is a consequence of $(X+Y+Z)^n=(X+(Y+Z))^n$, and similar formulas hold for higher multinomial coefficients.







                                    share|cite|improve this answer












                                    share|cite|improve this answer



                                    share|cite|improve this answer










                                    answered Oct 23 '13 at 12:17









                                    Marc van LeeuwenMarc van Leeuwen

                                    88.7k5111230




                                    88.7k5111230





















                                        1












                                        $begingroup$

                                        Given $n$ people, we can form a committee of size $b$ in $nchoose b$ ways. Once the committee is formed we can form a sub-committee of size $a$ in $bchoose a$ ways. Thus we can form a committee of size $b$ with a sub-committee of size $a$ in $nchoose bbchoose a$ ways. We can count the same thing by forming the sub-committee first and then forming the committee that contains the sub-committee. Given $n$ people we can form a sub-committee of size $a$ in $nchoose a$ ways. Once the sub-committee is formed we must form the committee of size $b-a$ from the remaining $n-a$ people in $n-achoose b-a$ ways. Thus we can form a sub-committee of size $a$ while forming the committee of size $b-a$ that contains the sub-committee in $nchoose an-achoose b-a$ ways. Hence $nchoose bbchoose a=nchoose an-achoose b-a$.



                                        This combinatorial identity is known as the Subset-of-a-Subset identity.






                                        share|cite|improve this answer











                                        $endgroup$








                                        • 1




                                          $begingroup$
                                          Not serious objection: the two procedures are not equivalent, since in the second solution, the soldiers go to war untrained! (Also if you use $a$ as a variable, please put dollars around it.)
                                          $endgroup$
                                          – Marc van Leeuwen
                                          Oct 23 '13 at 12:04











                                        • $begingroup$
                                          Nice catch! I'll edit it to the more familiar committee argument. Thank you.
                                          $endgroup$
                                          – 1233dfv
                                          Oct 25 '13 at 18:12















                                        1












                                        $begingroup$

                                        Given $n$ people, we can form a committee of size $b$ in $nchoose b$ ways. Once the committee is formed we can form a sub-committee of size $a$ in $bchoose a$ ways. Thus we can form a committee of size $b$ with a sub-committee of size $a$ in $nchoose bbchoose a$ ways. We can count the same thing by forming the sub-committee first and then forming the committee that contains the sub-committee. Given $n$ people we can form a sub-committee of size $a$ in $nchoose a$ ways. Once the sub-committee is formed we must form the committee of size $b-a$ from the remaining $n-a$ people in $n-achoose b-a$ ways. Thus we can form a sub-committee of size $a$ while forming the committee of size $b-a$ that contains the sub-committee in $nchoose an-achoose b-a$ ways. Hence $nchoose bbchoose a=nchoose an-achoose b-a$.



                                        This combinatorial identity is known as the Subset-of-a-Subset identity.






                                        share|cite|improve this answer











                                        $endgroup$








                                        • 1




                                          $begingroup$
                                          Not serious objection: the two procedures are not equivalent, since in the second solution, the soldiers go to war untrained! (Also if you use $a$ as a variable, please put dollars around it.)
                                          $endgroup$
                                          – Marc van Leeuwen
                                          Oct 23 '13 at 12:04











                                        • $begingroup$
                                          Nice catch! I'll edit it to the more familiar committee argument. Thank you.
                                          $endgroup$
                                          – 1233dfv
                                          Oct 25 '13 at 18:12













                                        1












                                        1








                                        1





                                        $begingroup$

                                        Given $n$ people, we can form a committee of size $b$ in $nchoose b$ ways. Once the committee is formed we can form a sub-committee of size $a$ in $bchoose a$ ways. Thus we can form a committee of size $b$ with a sub-committee of size $a$ in $nchoose bbchoose a$ ways. We can count the same thing by forming the sub-committee first and then forming the committee that contains the sub-committee. Given $n$ people we can form a sub-committee of size $a$ in $nchoose a$ ways. Once the sub-committee is formed we must form the committee of size $b-a$ from the remaining $n-a$ people in $n-achoose b-a$ ways. Thus we can form a sub-committee of size $a$ while forming the committee of size $b-a$ that contains the sub-committee in $nchoose an-achoose b-a$ ways. Hence $nchoose bbchoose a=nchoose an-achoose b-a$.



                                        This combinatorial identity is known as the Subset-of-a-Subset identity.






                                        share|cite|improve this answer











                                        $endgroup$



                                        Given $n$ people, we can form a committee of size $b$ in $nchoose b$ ways. Once the committee is formed we can form a sub-committee of size $a$ in $bchoose a$ ways. Thus we can form a committee of size $b$ with a sub-committee of size $a$ in $nchoose bbchoose a$ ways. We can count the same thing by forming the sub-committee first and then forming the committee that contains the sub-committee. Given $n$ people we can form a sub-committee of size $a$ in $nchoose a$ ways. Once the sub-committee is formed we must form the committee of size $b-a$ from the remaining $n-a$ people in $n-achoose b-a$ ways. Thus we can form a sub-committee of size $a$ while forming the committee of size $b-a$ that contains the sub-committee in $nchoose an-achoose b-a$ ways. Hence $nchoose bbchoose a=nchoose an-achoose b-a$.



                                        This combinatorial identity is known as the Subset-of-a-Subset identity.







                                        share|cite|improve this answer














                                        share|cite|improve this answer



                                        share|cite|improve this answer








                                        edited Oct 25 '13 at 18:09

























                                        answered Oct 23 '13 at 1:15









                                        1233dfv1233dfv

                                        4,2031326




                                        4,2031326







                                        • 1




                                          $begingroup$
                                          Not serious objection: the two procedures are not equivalent, since in the second solution, the soldiers go to war untrained! (Also if you use $a$ as a variable, please put dollars around it.)
                                          $endgroup$
                                          – Marc van Leeuwen
                                          Oct 23 '13 at 12:04











                                        • $begingroup$
                                          Nice catch! I'll edit it to the more familiar committee argument. Thank you.
                                          $endgroup$
                                          – 1233dfv
                                          Oct 25 '13 at 18:12












                                        • 1




                                          $begingroup$
                                          Not serious objection: the two procedures are not equivalent, since in the second solution, the soldiers go to war untrained! (Also if you use $a$ as a variable, please put dollars around it.)
                                          $endgroup$
                                          – Marc van Leeuwen
                                          Oct 23 '13 at 12:04











                                        • $begingroup$
                                          Nice catch! I'll edit it to the more familiar committee argument. Thank you.
                                          $endgroup$
                                          – 1233dfv
                                          Oct 25 '13 at 18:12







                                        1




                                        1




                                        $begingroup$
                                        Not serious objection: the two procedures are not equivalent, since in the second solution, the soldiers go to war untrained! (Also if you use $a$ as a variable, please put dollars around it.)
                                        $endgroup$
                                        – Marc van Leeuwen
                                        Oct 23 '13 at 12:04





                                        $begingroup$
                                        Not serious objection: the two procedures are not equivalent, since in the second solution, the soldiers go to war untrained! (Also if you use $a$ as a variable, please put dollars around it.)
                                        $endgroup$
                                        – Marc van Leeuwen
                                        Oct 23 '13 at 12:04













                                        $begingroup$
                                        Nice catch! I'll edit it to the more familiar committee argument. Thank you.
                                        $endgroup$
                                        – 1233dfv
                                        Oct 25 '13 at 18:12




                                        $begingroup$
                                        Nice catch! I'll edit it to the more familiar committee argument. Thank you.
                                        $endgroup$
                                        – 1233dfv
                                        Oct 25 '13 at 18:12

















                                        draft saved

                                        draft discarded
















































                                        Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


                                        • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                                        But avoid


                                        • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                                        • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

                                        Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


                                        To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                                        draft saved


                                        draft discarded














                                        StackExchange.ready(
                                        function ()
                                        StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f534202%2fprove-binomna-binomn-ab-a-binomnb-binomba%23new-answer', 'question_page');

                                        );

                                        Post as a guest















                                        Required, but never shown





















































                                        Required, but never shown














                                        Required, but never shown












                                        Required, but never shown







                                        Required, but never shown

































                                        Required, but never shown














                                        Required, but never shown












                                        Required, but never shown







                                        Required, but never shown







                                        Popular posts from this blog

                                        How should I support this large drywall patch? Planned maintenance scheduled April 23, 2019 at 00:00UTC (8:00pm US/Eastern) Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara Unicorn Meta Zoo #1: Why another podcast?How do I cover large gaps in drywall?How do I keep drywall around a patch from crumbling?Can I glue a second layer of drywall?How to patch long strip on drywall?Large drywall patch: how to avoid bulging seams?Drywall Mesh Patch vs. Bulge? To remove or not to remove?How to fix this drywall job?Prep drywall before backsplashWhat's the best way to fix this horrible drywall patch job?Drywall patching using 3M Patch Plus Primer

                                        random experiment with two different functions on unit interval Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara Planned maintenance scheduled April 23, 2019 at 00:00UTC (8:00pm US/Eastern)Random variable and probability space notionsRandom Walk with EdgesFinding functions where the increase over a random interval is Poisson distributedNumber of days until dayCan an observed event in fact be of zero probability?Unit random processmodels of coins and uniform distributionHow to get the number of successes given $n$ trials , probability $P$ and a random variable $X$Absorbing Markov chain in a computer. Is “almost every” turned into always convergence in computer executions?Stopped random walk is not uniformly integrable

                                        Lowndes Grove History Architecture References Navigation menu32°48′6″N 79°57′58″W / 32.80167°N 79.96611°W / 32.80167; -79.9661132°48′6″N 79°57′58″W / 32.80167°N 79.96611°W / 32.80167; -79.9661178002500"National Register Information System"Historic houses of South Carolina"Lowndes Grove""+32° 48' 6.00", −79° 57' 58.00""Lowndes Grove, Charleston County (260 St. Margaret St., Charleston)""Lowndes Grove"The Charleston ExpositionIt Happened in South Carolina"Lowndes Grove (House), Saint Margaret Street & Sixth Avenue, Charleston, Charleston County, SC(Photographs)"Plantations of the Carolina Low Countrye