Prove for any postive $k$,such $2^m-2^n|k^m-k^n$ The 2019 Stack Overflow Developer Survey Results Are Inif for any postive integer $(b-k)|(a-k^n)$ why $a=b^n?$Find all odd positive integers $n$ greater than $1$ such that for any coprime divisors …Prove that there are no positive integers $a$ and $b$, such that $b^4 + b + 1 = a^4$Find all integer solutions to $a+b+c|ab+bc+ca|abc$May be this Conjecture is hold? with $n$ consecutive postive integers problemproof - infinite pair integers $a$ and $b$ such that $a + b = 100$ and $gcd(a, b) = 5$Find all numbers such that “Product of all divisors=cube of number”.$x^a+b-1$ is divisible by $x^a+mx^b+1$ for every positive integers $x$.Find all positive integers $a$ and $b$ such that $(1 + a)(8 + b)(a + b) = 27ab$.Prove $n$ having to be an exponent of 2 for $b^n + 1 =$ a prime number

A poker game description that does not feel gimmicky

Identify boardgame from Big movie

What are the motivations for publishing new editions of an existing textbook, beyond new discoveries in a field?

Button changing it's text & action. Good or terrible?

Why do we hear so much about the Trump administration deciding to impose and then remove tariffs?

Did Section 31 appear in Star Trek: The Next Generation?

Lightning Grid - Columns and Rows?

Can someone be penalized for an "unlawful" act if no penalty is specified?

Output the Arecibo Message

Origin of "cooter" meaning "vagina"

Is bread bad for ducks?

Is flight data recorder erased after every flight?

What does ひと匙 mean in this manga and has it been used colloquially?

Resizing object distorts it (Illustrator CC 2018)

How to manage monthly salary

Which Sci-Fi work first showed weapon of galactic-scale mass destruction?

Why can Shazam fly?

What does Linus Torvalds mean when he says that Git "never ever" tracks a file?

"as much details as you can remember"

Why was M87 targetted for the Event Horizon Telescope instead of Sagittarius A*?

slides for 30min~1hr skype tenure track application interview

Aging parents with no investments

Do these rules for Critical Successes and Critical Failures seem fair?

Should I use my personal e-mail address, or my workplace one, when registering to external websites for work purposes?



Prove for any postive $k$,such $2^m-2^n|k^m-k^n$



The 2019 Stack Overflow Developer Survey Results Are Inif for any postive integer $(b-k)|(a-k^n)$ why $a=b^n?$Find all odd positive integers $n$ greater than $1$ such that for any coprime divisors …Prove that there are no positive integers $a$ and $b$, such that $b^4 + b + 1 = a^4$Find all integer solutions to $a+b+c|ab+bc+ca|abc$May be this Conjecture is hold? with $n$ consecutive postive integers problemproof - infinite pair integers $a$ and $b$ such that $a + b = 100$ and $gcd(a, b) = 5$Find all numbers such that “Product of all divisors=cube of number”.$x^a+b-1$ is divisible by $x^a+mx^b+1$ for every positive integers $x$.Find all positive integers $a$ and $b$ such that $(1 + a)(8 + b)(a + b) = 27ab$.Prove $n$ having to be an exponent of 2 for $b^n + 1 =$ a prime number










9












$begingroup$


Let positive integers such $m>n$,and if $$2^m-2^n|3^m-3^n$$
then for any positive integers $k$ have
$$2^m-2^n|k^m-k^n$$



I have looked at the simpler case $k=1,2,3$.I was able to solve this,How to prove $kge 4$. Any progress on the problem is welcome.










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$











  • $begingroup$
    Surely this does not hold for $k=1$? Shouldn't this be for $kge2$?
    $endgroup$
    – Mufasa
    Jan 20 '16 at 12:17






  • 2




    $begingroup$
    @Mufasa Is not zero divisible by every number?
    $endgroup$
    – Chad Shin
    Jan 20 '16 at 12:20










  • $begingroup$
    @ChadShin - Oops! Sorry I misread this as the other way around - thanks for clarifying
    $endgroup$
    – Mufasa
    Jan 20 '16 at 12:21










  • $begingroup$
    Could anyone give me $(m,n)$ such that $m-n$ is not 2 or 1?
    $endgroup$
    – Chad Shin
    Jan 20 '16 at 12:41







  • 2




    $begingroup$
    FWIW I did a small Mathematica search. If $1le nle 100$ and $n<mle n+100$, then the only pairs that work are $$(1,2),(1,3),(1,5),(2,4),(2,6),(2,8),(2,14),(3,5),(3,7),(3,9),(3,15),(4,8),(4,16).$$ If that list is complete proving the claim is easy, because no prime factor $>13$ occurs as a factor of $2^m-2^n$ in those cases.
    $endgroup$
    – Jyrki Lahtonen
    Jan 20 '16 at 13:39
















9












$begingroup$


Let positive integers such $m>n$,and if $$2^m-2^n|3^m-3^n$$
then for any positive integers $k$ have
$$2^m-2^n|k^m-k^n$$



I have looked at the simpler case $k=1,2,3$.I was able to solve this,How to prove $kge 4$. Any progress on the problem is welcome.










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$











  • $begingroup$
    Surely this does not hold for $k=1$? Shouldn't this be for $kge2$?
    $endgroup$
    – Mufasa
    Jan 20 '16 at 12:17






  • 2




    $begingroup$
    @Mufasa Is not zero divisible by every number?
    $endgroup$
    – Chad Shin
    Jan 20 '16 at 12:20










  • $begingroup$
    @ChadShin - Oops! Sorry I misread this as the other way around - thanks for clarifying
    $endgroup$
    – Mufasa
    Jan 20 '16 at 12:21










  • $begingroup$
    Could anyone give me $(m,n)$ such that $m-n$ is not 2 or 1?
    $endgroup$
    – Chad Shin
    Jan 20 '16 at 12:41







  • 2




    $begingroup$
    FWIW I did a small Mathematica search. If $1le nle 100$ and $n<mle n+100$, then the only pairs that work are $$(1,2),(1,3),(1,5),(2,4),(2,6),(2,8),(2,14),(3,5),(3,7),(3,9),(3,15),(4,8),(4,16).$$ If that list is complete proving the claim is easy, because no prime factor $>13$ occurs as a factor of $2^m-2^n$ in those cases.
    $endgroup$
    – Jyrki Lahtonen
    Jan 20 '16 at 13:39














9












9








9


5



$begingroup$


Let positive integers such $m>n$,and if $$2^m-2^n|3^m-3^n$$
then for any positive integers $k$ have
$$2^m-2^n|k^m-k^n$$



I have looked at the simpler case $k=1,2,3$.I was able to solve this,How to prove $kge 4$. Any progress on the problem is welcome.










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$




Let positive integers such $m>n$,and if $$2^m-2^n|3^m-3^n$$
then for any positive integers $k$ have
$$2^m-2^n|k^m-k^n$$



I have looked at the simpler case $k=1,2,3$.I was able to solve this,How to prove $kge 4$. Any progress on the problem is welcome.







number-theory






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited Jan 21 '16 at 10:13







function sug

















asked Jan 20 '16 at 12:06









function sugfunction sug

2681439




2681439











  • $begingroup$
    Surely this does not hold for $k=1$? Shouldn't this be for $kge2$?
    $endgroup$
    – Mufasa
    Jan 20 '16 at 12:17






  • 2




    $begingroup$
    @Mufasa Is not zero divisible by every number?
    $endgroup$
    – Chad Shin
    Jan 20 '16 at 12:20










  • $begingroup$
    @ChadShin - Oops! Sorry I misread this as the other way around - thanks for clarifying
    $endgroup$
    – Mufasa
    Jan 20 '16 at 12:21










  • $begingroup$
    Could anyone give me $(m,n)$ such that $m-n$ is not 2 or 1?
    $endgroup$
    – Chad Shin
    Jan 20 '16 at 12:41







  • 2




    $begingroup$
    FWIW I did a small Mathematica search. If $1le nle 100$ and $n<mle n+100$, then the only pairs that work are $$(1,2),(1,3),(1,5),(2,4),(2,6),(2,8),(2,14),(3,5),(3,7),(3,9),(3,15),(4,8),(4,16).$$ If that list is complete proving the claim is easy, because no prime factor $>13$ occurs as a factor of $2^m-2^n$ in those cases.
    $endgroup$
    – Jyrki Lahtonen
    Jan 20 '16 at 13:39

















  • $begingroup$
    Surely this does not hold for $k=1$? Shouldn't this be for $kge2$?
    $endgroup$
    – Mufasa
    Jan 20 '16 at 12:17






  • 2




    $begingroup$
    @Mufasa Is not zero divisible by every number?
    $endgroup$
    – Chad Shin
    Jan 20 '16 at 12:20










  • $begingroup$
    @ChadShin - Oops! Sorry I misread this as the other way around - thanks for clarifying
    $endgroup$
    – Mufasa
    Jan 20 '16 at 12:21










  • $begingroup$
    Could anyone give me $(m,n)$ such that $m-n$ is not 2 or 1?
    $endgroup$
    – Chad Shin
    Jan 20 '16 at 12:41







  • 2




    $begingroup$
    FWIW I did a small Mathematica search. If $1le nle 100$ and $n<mle n+100$, then the only pairs that work are $$(1,2),(1,3),(1,5),(2,4),(2,6),(2,8),(2,14),(3,5),(3,7),(3,9),(3,15),(4,8),(4,16).$$ If that list is complete proving the claim is easy, because no prime factor $>13$ occurs as a factor of $2^m-2^n$ in those cases.
    $endgroup$
    – Jyrki Lahtonen
    Jan 20 '16 at 13:39
















$begingroup$
Surely this does not hold for $k=1$? Shouldn't this be for $kge2$?
$endgroup$
– Mufasa
Jan 20 '16 at 12:17




$begingroup$
Surely this does not hold for $k=1$? Shouldn't this be for $kge2$?
$endgroup$
– Mufasa
Jan 20 '16 at 12:17




2




2




$begingroup$
@Mufasa Is not zero divisible by every number?
$endgroup$
– Chad Shin
Jan 20 '16 at 12:20




$begingroup$
@Mufasa Is not zero divisible by every number?
$endgroup$
– Chad Shin
Jan 20 '16 at 12:20












$begingroup$
@ChadShin - Oops! Sorry I misread this as the other way around - thanks for clarifying
$endgroup$
– Mufasa
Jan 20 '16 at 12:21




$begingroup$
@ChadShin - Oops! Sorry I misread this as the other way around - thanks for clarifying
$endgroup$
– Mufasa
Jan 20 '16 at 12:21












$begingroup$
Could anyone give me $(m,n)$ such that $m-n$ is not 2 or 1?
$endgroup$
– Chad Shin
Jan 20 '16 at 12:41





$begingroup$
Could anyone give me $(m,n)$ such that $m-n$ is not 2 or 1?
$endgroup$
– Chad Shin
Jan 20 '16 at 12:41





2




2




$begingroup$
FWIW I did a small Mathematica search. If $1le nle 100$ and $n<mle n+100$, then the only pairs that work are $$(1,2),(1,3),(1,5),(2,4),(2,6),(2,8),(2,14),(3,5),(3,7),(3,9),(3,15),(4,8),(4,16).$$ If that list is complete proving the claim is easy, because no prime factor $>13$ occurs as a factor of $2^m-2^n$ in those cases.
$endgroup$
– Jyrki Lahtonen
Jan 20 '16 at 13:39





$begingroup$
FWIW I did a small Mathematica search. If $1le nle 100$ and $n<mle n+100$, then the only pairs that work are $$(1,2),(1,3),(1,5),(2,4),(2,6),(2,8),(2,14),(3,5),(3,7),(3,9),(3,15),(4,8),(4,16).$$ If that list is complete proving the claim is easy, because no prime factor $>13$ occurs as a factor of $2^m-2^n$ in those cases.
$endgroup$
– Jyrki Lahtonen
Jan 20 '16 at 13:39











1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















0












$begingroup$

There are only finitely many of $(m,n)$'s for which $2^m-2^n|k^m-k^n$ holds for all $k$ (as observed also by Jyrki in comments).
This is proven in paper by Sun Qi and Zhang Ming-Zhi Pairs where $2^a - 2^b$ divides $n^a - n^b$ for all $n$, where they show that only $(m,n)$ for which this holds with $0 leq n < m$ are:



$$
(1,0),(2,1),(3,1),(4,2),(5,3),(5,1),(6, 2), (7, 3),
(8, 4), (8, 2), (9, 3), (14, 2), (15, 3), (16, 4).
$$



This is also referred in $B47$ in Richard Guy's book Unsolved Problems in Number Theory.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$













    Your Answer





    StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
    return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
    StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
    StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
    );
    );
    , "mathjax-editing");

    StackExchange.ready(function()
    var channelOptions =
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "69"
    ;
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
    createEditor();
    );

    else
    createEditor();

    );

    function createEditor()
    StackExchange.prepareEditor(
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
    convertImagesToLinks: true,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: 10,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader:
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    ,
    noCode: true, onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    );



    );













    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function ()
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f1619456%2fprove-for-any-postive-k-such-2m-2nkm-kn%23new-answer', 'question_page');

    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes








    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    0












    $begingroup$

    There are only finitely many of $(m,n)$'s for which $2^m-2^n|k^m-k^n$ holds for all $k$ (as observed also by Jyrki in comments).
    This is proven in paper by Sun Qi and Zhang Ming-Zhi Pairs where $2^a - 2^b$ divides $n^a - n^b$ for all $n$, where they show that only $(m,n)$ for which this holds with $0 leq n < m$ are:



    $$
    (1,0),(2,1),(3,1),(4,2),(5,3),(5,1),(6, 2), (7, 3),
    (8, 4), (8, 2), (9, 3), (14, 2), (15, 3), (16, 4).
    $$



    This is also referred in $B47$ in Richard Guy's book Unsolved Problems in Number Theory.






    share|cite|improve this answer









    $endgroup$

















      0












      $begingroup$

      There are only finitely many of $(m,n)$'s for which $2^m-2^n|k^m-k^n$ holds for all $k$ (as observed also by Jyrki in comments).
      This is proven in paper by Sun Qi and Zhang Ming-Zhi Pairs where $2^a - 2^b$ divides $n^a - n^b$ for all $n$, where they show that only $(m,n)$ for which this holds with $0 leq n < m$ are:



      $$
      (1,0),(2,1),(3,1),(4,2),(5,3),(5,1),(6, 2), (7, 3),
      (8, 4), (8, 2), (9, 3), (14, 2), (15, 3), (16, 4).
      $$



      This is also referred in $B47$ in Richard Guy's book Unsolved Problems in Number Theory.






      share|cite|improve this answer









      $endgroup$















        0












        0








        0





        $begingroup$

        There are only finitely many of $(m,n)$'s for which $2^m-2^n|k^m-k^n$ holds for all $k$ (as observed also by Jyrki in comments).
        This is proven in paper by Sun Qi and Zhang Ming-Zhi Pairs where $2^a - 2^b$ divides $n^a - n^b$ for all $n$, where they show that only $(m,n)$ for which this holds with $0 leq n < m$ are:



        $$
        (1,0),(2,1),(3,1),(4,2),(5,3),(5,1),(6, 2), (7, 3),
        (8, 4), (8, 2), (9, 3), (14, 2), (15, 3), (16, 4).
        $$



        This is also referred in $B47$ in Richard Guy's book Unsolved Problems in Number Theory.






        share|cite|improve this answer









        $endgroup$



        There are only finitely many of $(m,n)$'s for which $2^m-2^n|k^m-k^n$ holds for all $k$ (as observed also by Jyrki in comments).
        This is proven in paper by Sun Qi and Zhang Ming-Zhi Pairs where $2^a - 2^b$ divides $n^a - n^b$ for all $n$, where they show that only $(m,n)$ for which this holds with $0 leq n < m$ are:



        $$
        (1,0),(2,1),(3,1),(4,2),(5,3),(5,1),(6, 2), (7, 3),
        (8, 4), (8, 2), (9, 3), (14, 2), (15, 3), (16, 4).
        $$



        This is also referred in $B47$ in Richard Guy's book Unsolved Problems in Number Theory.







        share|cite|improve this answer












        share|cite|improve this answer



        share|cite|improve this answer










        answered Mar 23 at 18:15









        SilSil

        5,65821745




        5,65821745



























            draft saved

            draft discarded
















































            Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid


            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

            Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function ()
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f1619456%2fprove-for-any-postive-k-such-2m-2nkm-kn%23new-answer', 'question_page');

            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            Popular posts from this blog

            Moe incest case Sentencing See also References Navigation menu"'Australian Josef Fritzl' fathered four children by daughter""Small town recoils in horror at 'Australian Fritzl' incest case""Victorian rape allegations echo Fritzl case - Just In (Australian Broadcasting Corporation)""Incest father jailed for 22 years""'Australian Fritzl' sentenced to 22 years in prison for abusing daughter for three decades""RSJ v The Queen"

            John Burke, 9th Earl of Clanricarde References Navigation menuA General and heraldic dictionary of the peerage and baronetage of the British EmpireLeigh Rayment's Peerage Pages

            Football at the 1986 Brunei Merdeka Games Contents Teams Group stage Knockout stage References Navigation menu"Brunei Merdeka Games 1986".