Conjecture about primes and the greatest common divisor The 2019 Stack Overflow Developer Survey Results Are InGreatest common divisor sequenceprime numbers and greatest common divisorGreatest Common Divisor DivisibilityGreatest Common Divisor and PrimesGreatest common divisor algorithmGoldbach's Conjecture and 1-1 correspondenceLeave-$k$-out greatest common divisorA confession and a conjecture $gcd(a-b,a+b)|2gcd(a,b)$A conjecture about big prime numbersWhy do we notate the greatest common divisor of $a$ and $b$ as $(a,b)$?
Are there incongruent pythagorean triangles with the same perimeter and same area?
Can a flute soloist sit?
Am I thawing this London Broil safely?
Why not take a picture of a closer black hole?
Is an up-to-date browser secure on an out-of-date OS?
Why isn't airport relocation done gradually?
Lightning Grid - Columns and Rows?
What did it mean to "align" a radio?
Are spiders unable to hurt humans, especially very small spiders?
How to support a colleague who finds meetings extremely tiring?
Can a rogue use sneak attack with weapons that have the thrown property even if they are not thrown?
Multiply Two Integer Polynomials
Why hard-Brexiteers don't insist on a hard border to prevent illegal immigration after Brexit?
What is the most effective way of iterating a std::vector and why?
Should I use my personal e-mail address, or my workplace one, when registering to external websites for work purposes?
Are there any other methods to apply to solving simultaneous equations?
What is the accessibility of a package's `Private` context variables?
Landlord wants to switch my lease to a "Land contract" to "get back at the city"
What does ひと匙 mean in this manga and has it been used colloquially?
Can you compress metal and what would be the consequences?
Falsification in Math vs Science
Button changing it's text & action. Good or terrible?
For what reasons would an animal species NOT cross a *horizontal* land bridge?
What tool would a Roman-age civilization have for the breaking of silver and other metals into dust?
Conjecture about primes and the greatest common divisor
The 2019 Stack Overflow Developer Survey Results Are InGreatest common divisor sequenceprime numbers and greatest common divisorGreatest Common Divisor DivisibilityGreatest Common Divisor and PrimesGreatest common divisor algorithmGoldbach's Conjecture and 1-1 correspondenceLeave-$k$-out greatest common divisorA confession and a conjecture $gcd(a-b,a+b)|2gcd(a,b)$A conjecture about big prime numbersWhy do we notate the greatest common divisor of $a$ and $b$ as $(a,b)$?
$begingroup$
Conjecture:
Given $m,ninmathbb N^+$, one odd and one even, there are two
primes $p,q$ such that $|mp-nq|=gcd(m,n)$.
I hope MSE can determine its validity.
From time to time, when testing my growing math packages BigZ and Forthmath, I recognize some patterns which I can't prove or disprove (or even have the ambition to). I post them here with the hope that it will not annoy too much. I hope you can bear with it.
number-theory prime-numbers greatest-common-divisor conjectures
$endgroup$
|
show 1 more comment
$begingroup$
Conjecture:
Given $m,ninmathbb N^+$, one odd and one even, there are two
primes $p,q$ such that $|mp-nq|=gcd(m,n)$.
I hope MSE can determine its validity.
From time to time, when testing my growing math packages BigZ and Forthmath, I recognize some patterns which I can't prove or disprove (or even have the ambition to). I post them here with the hope that it will not annoy too much. I hope you can bear with it.
number-theory prime-numbers greatest-common-divisor conjectures
$endgroup$
1
$begingroup$
I think it is true by the structure of the solution set to Bézout's identity and Dirichlet's theorem on arithmetic progressions. EDIT: But some details need to be taken care of.
$endgroup$
– Jeppe Stig Nielsen
Mar 23 at 17:33
2
$begingroup$
@JeppeStigNielsen I was thinking the same thing. But the problem is: don't you need to show that two different arithmetic progressions have the property that the $n$th term of each is a prime for some $n$?
$endgroup$
– Ashvin Swaminathan
Mar 23 at 19:36
3
$begingroup$
@AshvinSwaminathan Yes, something like that. The two progressions should not "conspire" in a way that they never yield primes simultaneously. I do not know if this is technically hard to establish rigorously. But intuitively, Lehs's conjecture should be true.
$endgroup$
– Jeppe Stig Nielsen
Mar 23 at 19:48
2
$begingroup$
I think this problem is equivalent to an unsolved version of Goldbach's conjecture. Take $m = 1$. Then essentially we're asking the following question: given a linear function $f(x) = a x + b$ with $a,b$ coprime integers, is there some prime $q$ for which $f(q) = p$ is also prime? Some googling suggests this is not known.
$endgroup$
– Ashvin Swaminathan
Mar 24 at 4:02
1
$begingroup$
@Lehs I think, Ashvin's version is a case of the Bunyakovsky conjecture. I share Ashvin's doubt that this special case is known.
$endgroup$
– Peter
Mar 24 at 14:19
|
show 1 more comment
$begingroup$
Conjecture:
Given $m,ninmathbb N^+$, one odd and one even, there are two
primes $p,q$ such that $|mp-nq|=gcd(m,n)$.
I hope MSE can determine its validity.
From time to time, when testing my growing math packages BigZ and Forthmath, I recognize some patterns which I can't prove or disprove (or even have the ambition to). I post them here with the hope that it will not annoy too much. I hope you can bear with it.
number-theory prime-numbers greatest-common-divisor conjectures
$endgroup$
Conjecture:
Given $m,ninmathbb N^+$, one odd and one even, there are two
primes $p,q$ such that $|mp-nq|=gcd(m,n)$.
I hope MSE can determine its validity.
From time to time, when testing my growing math packages BigZ and Forthmath, I recognize some patterns which I can't prove or disprove (or even have the ambition to). I post them here with the hope that it will not annoy too much. I hope you can bear with it.
number-theory prime-numbers greatest-common-divisor conjectures
number-theory prime-numbers greatest-common-divisor conjectures
edited Mar 23 at 19:01
Lehs
asked Mar 23 at 17:04
LehsLehs
6,99731664
6,99731664
1
$begingroup$
I think it is true by the structure of the solution set to Bézout's identity and Dirichlet's theorem on arithmetic progressions. EDIT: But some details need to be taken care of.
$endgroup$
– Jeppe Stig Nielsen
Mar 23 at 17:33
2
$begingroup$
@JeppeStigNielsen I was thinking the same thing. But the problem is: don't you need to show that two different arithmetic progressions have the property that the $n$th term of each is a prime for some $n$?
$endgroup$
– Ashvin Swaminathan
Mar 23 at 19:36
3
$begingroup$
@AshvinSwaminathan Yes, something like that. The two progressions should not "conspire" in a way that they never yield primes simultaneously. I do not know if this is technically hard to establish rigorously. But intuitively, Lehs's conjecture should be true.
$endgroup$
– Jeppe Stig Nielsen
Mar 23 at 19:48
2
$begingroup$
I think this problem is equivalent to an unsolved version of Goldbach's conjecture. Take $m = 1$. Then essentially we're asking the following question: given a linear function $f(x) = a x + b$ with $a,b$ coprime integers, is there some prime $q$ for which $f(q) = p$ is also prime? Some googling suggests this is not known.
$endgroup$
– Ashvin Swaminathan
Mar 24 at 4:02
1
$begingroup$
@Lehs I think, Ashvin's version is a case of the Bunyakovsky conjecture. I share Ashvin's doubt that this special case is known.
$endgroup$
– Peter
Mar 24 at 14:19
|
show 1 more comment
1
$begingroup$
I think it is true by the structure of the solution set to Bézout's identity and Dirichlet's theorem on arithmetic progressions. EDIT: But some details need to be taken care of.
$endgroup$
– Jeppe Stig Nielsen
Mar 23 at 17:33
2
$begingroup$
@JeppeStigNielsen I was thinking the same thing. But the problem is: don't you need to show that two different arithmetic progressions have the property that the $n$th term of each is a prime for some $n$?
$endgroup$
– Ashvin Swaminathan
Mar 23 at 19:36
3
$begingroup$
@AshvinSwaminathan Yes, something like that. The two progressions should not "conspire" in a way that they never yield primes simultaneously. I do not know if this is technically hard to establish rigorously. But intuitively, Lehs's conjecture should be true.
$endgroup$
– Jeppe Stig Nielsen
Mar 23 at 19:48
2
$begingroup$
I think this problem is equivalent to an unsolved version of Goldbach's conjecture. Take $m = 1$. Then essentially we're asking the following question: given a linear function $f(x) = a x + b$ with $a,b$ coprime integers, is there some prime $q$ for which $f(q) = p$ is also prime? Some googling suggests this is not known.
$endgroup$
– Ashvin Swaminathan
Mar 24 at 4:02
1
$begingroup$
@Lehs I think, Ashvin's version is a case of the Bunyakovsky conjecture. I share Ashvin's doubt that this special case is known.
$endgroup$
– Peter
Mar 24 at 14:19
1
1
$begingroup$
I think it is true by the structure of the solution set to Bézout's identity and Dirichlet's theorem on arithmetic progressions. EDIT: But some details need to be taken care of.
$endgroup$
– Jeppe Stig Nielsen
Mar 23 at 17:33
$begingroup$
I think it is true by the structure of the solution set to Bézout's identity and Dirichlet's theorem on arithmetic progressions. EDIT: But some details need to be taken care of.
$endgroup$
– Jeppe Stig Nielsen
Mar 23 at 17:33
2
2
$begingroup$
@JeppeStigNielsen I was thinking the same thing. But the problem is: don't you need to show that two different arithmetic progressions have the property that the $n$th term of each is a prime for some $n$?
$endgroup$
– Ashvin Swaminathan
Mar 23 at 19:36
$begingroup$
@JeppeStigNielsen I was thinking the same thing. But the problem is: don't you need to show that two different arithmetic progressions have the property that the $n$th term of each is a prime for some $n$?
$endgroup$
– Ashvin Swaminathan
Mar 23 at 19:36
3
3
$begingroup$
@AshvinSwaminathan Yes, something like that. The two progressions should not "conspire" in a way that they never yield primes simultaneously. I do not know if this is technically hard to establish rigorously. But intuitively, Lehs's conjecture should be true.
$endgroup$
– Jeppe Stig Nielsen
Mar 23 at 19:48
$begingroup$
@AshvinSwaminathan Yes, something like that. The two progressions should not "conspire" in a way that they never yield primes simultaneously. I do not know if this is technically hard to establish rigorously. But intuitively, Lehs's conjecture should be true.
$endgroup$
– Jeppe Stig Nielsen
Mar 23 at 19:48
2
2
$begingroup$
I think this problem is equivalent to an unsolved version of Goldbach's conjecture. Take $m = 1$. Then essentially we're asking the following question: given a linear function $f(x) = a x + b$ with $a,b$ coprime integers, is there some prime $q$ for which $f(q) = p$ is also prime? Some googling suggests this is not known.
$endgroup$
– Ashvin Swaminathan
Mar 24 at 4:02
$begingroup$
I think this problem is equivalent to an unsolved version of Goldbach's conjecture. Take $m = 1$. Then essentially we're asking the following question: given a linear function $f(x) = a x + b$ with $a,b$ coprime integers, is there some prime $q$ for which $f(q) = p$ is also prime? Some googling suggests this is not known.
$endgroup$
– Ashvin Swaminathan
Mar 24 at 4:02
1
1
$begingroup$
@Lehs I think, Ashvin's version is a case of the Bunyakovsky conjecture. I share Ashvin's doubt that this special case is known.
$endgroup$
– Peter
Mar 24 at 14:19
$begingroup$
@Lehs I think, Ashvin's version is a case of the Bunyakovsky conjecture. I share Ashvin's doubt that this special case is known.
$endgroup$
– Peter
Mar 24 at 14:19
|
show 1 more comment
0
active
oldest
votes
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
);
);
, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);
else
createEditor();
);
function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);
);
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3159577%2fconjecture-about-primes-and-the-greatest-common-divisor%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
0
active
oldest
votes
0
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3159577%2fconjecture-about-primes-and-the-greatest-common-divisor%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
1
$begingroup$
I think it is true by the structure of the solution set to Bézout's identity and Dirichlet's theorem on arithmetic progressions. EDIT: But some details need to be taken care of.
$endgroup$
– Jeppe Stig Nielsen
Mar 23 at 17:33
2
$begingroup$
@JeppeStigNielsen I was thinking the same thing. But the problem is: don't you need to show that two different arithmetic progressions have the property that the $n$th term of each is a prime for some $n$?
$endgroup$
– Ashvin Swaminathan
Mar 23 at 19:36
3
$begingroup$
@AshvinSwaminathan Yes, something like that. The two progressions should not "conspire" in a way that they never yield primes simultaneously. I do not know if this is technically hard to establish rigorously. But intuitively, Lehs's conjecture should be true.
$endgroup$
– Jeppe Stig Nielsen
Mar 23 at 19:48
2
$begingroup$
I think this problem is equivalent to an unsolved version of Goldbach's conjecture. Take $m = 1$. Then essentially we're asking the following question: given a linear function $f(x) = a x + b$ with $a,b$ coprime integers, is there some prime $q$ for which $f(q) = p$ is also prime? Some googling suggests this is not known.
$endgroup$
– Ashvin Swaminathan
Mar 24 at 4:02
1
$begingroup$
@Lehs I think, Ashvin's version is a case of the Bunyakovsky conjecture. I share Ashvin's doubt that this special case is known.
$endgroup$
– Peter
Mar 24 at 14:19