Diameters, distances and contraction mappings on a subset of $C_mathbbR[0,1]$ The 2019 Stack Overflow Developer Survey Results Are InA question about fixed points and non-expansive mapShow that $T:,c_0to c_0;;$, $xmapsto T(x)=(1,x_1,x_2,cdots),$ has no fixed pointsContinuous mapping between $X$ and $C([0,1])$sequence of continuous linear operators on banach spacesa non-decreasing sequence of functions with bounded L^p-norm is a Cauchy sequence in L^p spaceShowing that $C^1[0,1]$ is a Banach space with the $||f||=||f||_infty + ||f^prime||_infty$ norm.Is there a $fin C[0,1]$ such that $f(x)=frac12 sin (f(1-x))$Showing any bounded sequence in Holder space $C^1/2$ has a convergent subsequence in Holder space $C^1/3.$Compact subset of $C[0,1]$Why do uniformly continuous functions form a Banach space (with the sup norm)?Counterexample Banach-SteinhausConvergence in a norm vs convergence in a strong sense

Why didn't the Event Horizon Telescope team mention Sagittarius A*?

Button changing it's text & action. Good or terrible?

"as much details as you can remember"

What is the closest word meaning "respect for time / mindful"

What does "fetching by region is not available for SAM files" means?

Are there any other methods to apply to solving simultaneous equations?

Right tool to dig six foot holes?

What could be the right powersource for 15 seconds lifespan disposable giant chainsaw?

Where to refill my bottle in India?

Can we generate random numbers using irrational numbers like π and e?

How to manage monthly salary

Apparent duplicates between Haynes service instructions and MOT

Did Scotland spend $250,000 for the slogan "Welcome to Scotland"?

How to answer pointed "are you quitting" questioning when I don't want them to suspect

What do the Banks children have against barley water?

How to save as into a customized destination on macOS?

When should I buy a clipper card after flying to OAK?

Are there incongruent pythagorean triangles with the same perimeter and same area?

During Temple times, who can butcher a kosher animal?

What tool would a Roman-age civilization have for the breaking of silver and other metals into dust?

Why do we hear so much about the Trump administration deciding to impose and then remove tariffs?

Resizing object distorts it (Illustrator CC 2018)

Can a rogue use sneak attack with weapons that have the thrown property even if they are not thrown?

What is the motivation for a law requiring 2 parties to consent for recording a conversation



Diameters, distances and contraction mappings on a subset of $C_mathbbR[0,1]$



The 2019 Stack Overflow Developer Survey Results Are InA question about fixed points and non-expansive mapShow that $T:,c_0to c_0;;$, $xmapsto T(x)=(1,x_1,x_2,cdots),$ has no fixed pointsContinuous mapping between $X$ and $C([0,1])$sequence of continuous linear operators on banach spacesa non-decreasing sequence of functions with bounded L^p-norm is a Cauchy sequence in L^p spaceShowing that $C^1[0,1]$ is a Banach space with the $||f||=||f||_infty + ||f^prime||_infty$ norm.Is there a $fin C[0,1]$ such that $f(x)=frac12 sin (f(1-x))$Showing any bounded sequence in Holder space $C^1/2$ has a convergent subsequence in Holder space $C^1/3.$Compact subset of $C[0,1]$Why do uniformly continuous functions form a Banach space (with the sup norm)?Counterexample Banach-SteinhausConvergence in a norm vs convergence in a strong sense










2












$begingroup$


Let $$M=fin C_mathbbR([0,1]): f(0)=0le f(t)le f(1)=1,text for tin [0,1]$$ where $C_mathbbR([0,1])=f:[0,1]to mathbbR:ftext is continuous on [0,1]$ is Banach space with norm $|f|_infty=sup $ . Prove



(a) $M$ is closed subset of $C_mathbbR([0,1]).$



(b) $delta(f, M)=delta(M), $ where $f(t)=t$.



(c) $delta(f_n, M)=delta(M), $ where $f_n(t)=t^n, n=2,3,...$.



(d) Fix $f_0in M$ . Define $T_n:Mto M$ by $T_n(f)=frac(n-1)T(f)n+fracf_0n, nin mathbbN$.Then $T_n$ is a contraction mapping



(e) if $g_nin M$ is a fixed point of $T_n$ then $lim_nto infty|g_n-T(g_n)|=0$



Here $delta(M)= dim M=sup:x,yin M$ and



$delta (x,M)=sup x-y$



i am trying to prove (a)



for proving (a)



let $x_n$ be a sequence in $M$ such that $x_nto x$



we have to prove that $xin M$



so consider $|x_n-x|_infty=sup $



since $x)nto x$ so $|x_n-x|<epsilon $ this implies $|x_n(t)-x(t)|<epsilon$



from i here how to prove $xin M$



and for proving (e)



since $g_nin M$ is a fixed of $T_n$ so $T_n(g_n)=g_n$



so $lim_nto infty|g_n-T(g_n)|=lim_nto infty|T_n(g_n)-T(g_n)|=lim_nto infty|(T_n-T)(g_n)|$ from this step can we say ?



$lim_nto infty|g_n-T(g_n)|=0?$



and remaining problem i dont know how to prove can some one help thank you










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$
















    2












    $begingroup$


    Let $$M=fin C_mathbbR([0,1]): f(0)=0le f(t)le f(1)=1,text for tin [0,1]$$ where $C_mathbbR([0,1])=f:[0,1]to mathbbR:ftext is continuous on [0,1]$ is Banach space with norm $|f|_infty=sup $ . Prove



    (a) $M$ is closed subset of $C_mathbbR([0,1]).$



    (b) $delta(f, M)=delta(M), $ where $f(t)=t$.



    (c) $delta(f_n, M)=delta(M), $ where $f_n(t)=t^n, n=2,3,...$.



    (d) Fix $f_0in M$ . Define $T_n:Mto M$ by $T_n(f)=frac(n-1)T(f)n+fracf_0n, nin mathbbN$.Then $T_n$ is a contraction mapping



    (e) if $g_nin M$ is a fixed point of $T_n$ then $lim_nto infty|g_n-T(g_n)|=0$



    Here $delta(M)= dim M=sup:x,yin M$ and



    $delta (x,M)=sup x-y$



    i am trying to prove (a)



    for proving (a)



    let $x_n$ be a sequence in $M$ such that $x_nto x$



    we have to prove that $xin M$



    so consider $|x_n-x|_infty=sup $



    since $x)nto x$ so $|x_n-x|<epsilon $ this implies $|x_n(t)-x(t)|<epsilon$



    from i here how to prove $xin M$



    and for proving (e)



    since $g_nin M$ is a fixed of $T_n$ so $T_n(g_n)=g_n$



    so $lim_nto infty|g_n-T(g_n)|=lim_nto infty|T_n(g_n)-T(g_n)|=lim_nto infty|(T_n-T)(g_n)|$ from this step can we say ?



    $lim_nto infty|g_n-T(g_n)|=0?$



    and remaining problem i dont know how to prove can some one help thank you










    share|cite|improve this question











    $endgroup$














      2












      2








      2


      1



      $begingroup$


      Let $$M=fin C_mathbbR([0,1]): f(0)=0le f(t)le f(1)=1,text for tin [0,1]$$ where $C_mathbbR([0,1])=f:[0,1]to mathbbR:ftext is continuous on [0,1]$ is Banach space with norm $|f|_infty=sup $ . Prove



      (a) $M$ is closed subset of $C_mathbbR([0,1]).$



      (b) $delta(f, M)=delta(M), $ where $f(t)=t$.



      (c) $delta(f_n, M)=delta(M), $ where $f_n(t)=t^n, n=2,3,...$.



      (d) Fix $f_0in M$ . Define $T_n:Mto M$ by $T_n(f)=frac(n-1)T(f)n+fracf_0n, nin mathbbN$.Then $T_n$ is a contraction mapping



      (e) if $g_nin M$ is a fixed point of $T_n$ then $lim_nto infty|g_n-T(g_n)|=0$



      Here $delta(M)= dim M=sup:x,yin M$ and



      $delta (x,M)=sup x-y$



      i am trying to prove (a)



      for proving (a)



      let $x_n$ be a sequence in $M$ such that $x_nto x$



      we have to prove that $xin M$



      so consider $|x_n-x|_infty=sup $



      since $x)nto x$ so $|x_n-x|<epsilon $ this implies $|x_n(t)-x(t)|<epsilon$



      from i here how to prove $xin M$



      and for proving (e)



      since $g_nin M$ is a fixed of $T_n$ so $T_n(g_n)=g_n$



      so $lim_nto infty|g_n-T(g_n)|=lim_nto infty|T_n(g_n)-T(g_n)|=lim_nto infty|(T_n-T)(g_n)|$ from this step can we say ?



      $lim_nto infty|g_n-T(g_n)|=0?$



      and remaining problem i dont know how to prove can some one help thank you










      share|cite|improve this question











      $endgroup$




      Let $$M=fin C_mathbbR([0,1]): f(0)=0le f(t)le f(1)=1,text for tin [0,1]$$ where $C_mathbbR([0,1])=f:[0,1]to mathbbR:ftext is continuous on [0,1]$ is Banach space with norm $|f|_infty=sup $ . Prove



      (a) $M$ is closed subset of $C_mathbbR([0,1]).$



      (b) $delta(f, M)=delta(M), $ where $f(t)=t$.



      (c) $delta(f_n, M)=delta(M), $ where $f_n(t)=t^n, n=2,3,...$.



      (d) Fix $f_0in M$ . Define $T_n:Mto M$ by $T_n(f)=frac(n-1)T(f)n+fracf_0n, nin mathbbN$.Then $T_n$ is a contraction mapping



      (e) if $g_nin M$ is a fixed point of $T_n$ then $lim_nto infty|g_n-T(g_n)|=0$



      Here $delta(M)= dim M=sup:x,yin M$ and



      $delta (x,M)=sup x-y$



      i am trying to prove (a)



      for proving (a)



      let $x_n$ be a sequence in $M$ such that $x_nto x$



      we have to prove that $xin M$



      so consider $|x_n-x|_infty=sup $



      since $x)nto x$ so $|x_n-x|<epsilon $ this implies $|x_n(t)-x(t)|<epsilon$



      from i here how to prove $xin M$



      and for proving (e)



      since $g_nin M$ is a fixed of $T_n$ so $T_n(g_n)=g_n$



      so $lim_nto infty|g_n-T(g_n)|=lim_nto infty|T_n(g_n)-T(g_n)|=lim_nto infty|(T_n-T)(g_n)|$ from this step can we say ?



      $lim_nto infty|g_n-T(g_n)|=0?$



      and remaining problem i dont know how to prove can some one help thank you







      functional-analysis






      share|cite|improve this question















      share|cite|improve this question













      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question








      edited Mar 29 at 8:52







      Inverse Problem

















      asked Mar 23 at 16:51









      Inverse ProblemInverse Problem

      1,032918




      1,032918




















          3 Answers
          3






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          2












          $begingroup$

          (a): Assume $(f_n)_n$ is a sequence in $M$ such that $f_n to f in C[0,1]$ uniformly. We claim that $f in M$.



          Since uniform convergence implies pointwise convergence, we have
          $$f(0) = lim_ntoinfty f_n(0) = lim_ntoinfty 0 = 0$$
          $$f(1) = lim_ntoinfty f_n(1) = lim_ntoinfty 1 = 1$$
          $$f(x) = lim_ntoinfty underbracef_n(x)_in[0,1] in [0,1], quadforall x in [0,1]$$
          since $[0,1]$ is a closed set in $mathbbR$. Hence $f in M$ so $M$ is a closed set in $C[0,1]$.



          (b) and (c): For any $g,h in M$ we have
          $$-1 = 0 - 1le g(x) - h(x) le 1 - 0 = 1$$
          so $$|g-h|_infty = sup_x in [0,1]|g(x) - h(x)| le 1$$



          It follows $delta(M) le 1$. On the other hand, we have $f, f_n in M$ so $$delta(f,M), delta(f_n, M) le delta(M) le 1$$



          Also plugging in $t = frac1sqrt[n-1]n$ gives
          $$delta(M) ge delta(f,M), delta(f_n, M) ge |f_n-f|_infty = sup_t in [0,1]|t^n - t| = sup_t in [0,1]|t||t^n-1 - 1| ge frac1sqrt[n-1]nleft(1 - frac1nright) xrightarrowntoinfty 1$$
          so we conclude $delta(f,M) = delta(f_n, M) = delta(M) = 1$.



          For (e):



          beginalign
          |g_n - Tg_n|_infty &= |T_ng_n - Tg_n|_infty \
          &= left|left(fracn-1n - 1right)Tg_n + fracf_0nright|_infty \
          &= left|-frac1n Tg_n + fracf_0nright|_infty \
          &= frac1n|f_0 - Tg_n|_infty
          endalign

          To conclude that this converges to $0$ we have to know what is $T$.






          share|cite|improve this answer











          $endgroup$












          • $begingroup$
            i tried something on (e) is it right and how to prove (d)...thank you so much
            $endgroup$
            – Inverse Problem
            Mar 24 at 16:03










          • $begingroup$
            @InverseProblem Can you tell me what exactly is $T$? How is $T_n$ defined?
            $endgroup$
            – mechanodroid
            Mar 24 at 16:05










          • $begingroup$
            @mechanodroid....you correct beacuse i also got same doubt let me check again any way thanks for your fast response...
            $endgroup$
            – Inverse Problem
            Mar 24 at 16:07










          • $begingroup$
            is my attempt is correct for (e)?
            $endgroup$
            – Inverse Problem
            Mar 24 at 16:08










          • $begingroup$
            @InverseProblem I'm still not sure what is $T$, I have added my attempt for $(e)$ in the answer.
            $endgroup$
            – mechanodroid
            Mar 24 at 16:18



















          1












          $begingroup$

          Your subspace $M$ is the intersection of three closed sets
          $$
          M = f cap f : f(0)=0 cap f : f(1)=1 .
          $$

          The first set is closed because it is the closed unit ball of radius $1$ in $C_mathbbR[0,1]$. The second set is closed because it is the inverse image of $0$ under the continuous function $fin C_mathbbR[0,1] mapsto f(0)$. Similarly the third set is closed.






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$












          • $begingroup$
            Sir how to prove remaining problems
            $endgroup$
            – Inverse Problem
            Mar 24 at 1:09










          • $begingroup$
            @InverseProblem : What is $delta$?
            $endgroup$
            – DisintegratingByParts
            Mar 24 at 1:30










          • $begingroup$
            I defined in my question what is delta
            $endgroup$
            – Inverse Problem
            Mar 24 at 1:32










          • $begingroup$
            @InverseProblem : $M$ is not a subspace. o $delta(M)$ is not defined, and I don't see how distance relates to either.
            $endgroup$
            – DisintegratingByParts
            Mar 24 at 4:22






          • 1




            $begingroup$
            @InverseProblem : I'm just asking you to clarify your notation. I don't like the chat on this forum; it's poorly done.
            $endgroup$
            – DisintegratingByParts
            Mar 24 at 4:42


















          1












          $begingroup$

          I'll try to give a more detailed proof of (a) because you'll probably see similar exercises and problems involving function spaces.



          Let $f_n$ be a sequence in $M$ such that $f_n to f$. So let us prove that $f in M$:




          • $f in C([0,1],mathbbR)$:

          Note that with this norm $f_n to f$ means uniform convergence of continuous functions, since by definition:
          beginequation*
          |f_n - f|_C([0,1],mathbbR) to 0 iffsup_tin[0,1] |f_n(t)-f(t)| to 0
          endequation*



          It is a well-known fact that uniform limit of continuous functions is also continuous.



          • $f(0) = 0$ and $f(1) = 1$: It should be clear from the sequence.


          • $0 leq f(t) leq 1$ for all $tin[0,1]$:


          Suppose that $f(t_0) < 0$ for some $t_0in[0,1]$; then there is $varepsilon > 0$ such that $f(t_0) +varepsilon < 0$.



          Since $f_n$ converges to $f$ uniformly, then it also converges pointwise. Hence for $n > n_0$ (for $n_0$ big enough), we have:
          begingather
          |f_n(t_0)-f(t_0)| < varepsilon \
          -varepsilon < f_n(t_0)-f(t_0) < varepsilon \
          f(t_0)-varepsilon < f_n(t_0) < f(t_0)+varepsilon < 0\
          endgather



          This contradicts the fact that $f_n in M$ (that is, $f_n(t) geq 0$ for all $tin[0,1]$). The same reasoning can be applied to prove that $f(t) leq 1$.



          Hence $f in M$, and $M$ is closed.



          Remark 1: Note that we had to check that $f in C([0,1],mathbbR)$. It is an important step (albeit most of the time it'll be satisfied).



          Remark 2: For convergence of the sequence, generally you need to apply a convergence theorem (uniform limit, Arzelà-Áscoli, Lebesgue's Dominated Convergence, among others). That's one of the reasons you learn them!






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$












          • $begingroup$
            can you know how to solve remaining questions
            $endgroup$
            – Inverse Problem
            Mar 24 at 3:32











          Your Answer





          StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
          return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
          StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
          StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
          );
          );
          , "mathjax-editing");

          StackExchange.ready(function()
          var channelOptions =
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "69"
          ;
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
          createEditor();
          );

          else
          createEditor();

          );

          function createEditor()
          StackExchange.prepareEditor(
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
          convertImagesToLinks: true,
          noModals: true,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: 10,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          imageUploader:
          brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
          contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
          allowUrls: true
          ,
          noCode: true, onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          );



          );













          draft saved

          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function ()
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3159556%2fdiameters-distances-and-contraction-mappings-on-a-subset-of-c-mathbbr0-1%23new-answer', 'question_page');

          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown

























          3 Answers
          3






          active

          oldest

          votes








          3 Answers
          3






          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes









          2












          $begingroup$

          (a): Assume $(f_n)_n$ is a sequence in $M$ such that $f_n to f in C[0,1]$ uniformly. We claim that $f in M$.



          Since uniform convergence implies pointwise convergence, we have
          $$f(0) = lim_ntoinfty f_n(0) = lim_ntoinfty 0 = 0$$
          $$f(1) = lim_ntoinfty f_n(1) = lim_ntoinfty 1 = 1$$
          $$f(x) = lim_ntoinfty underbracef_n(x)_in[0,1] in [0,1], quadforall x in [0,1]$$
          since $[0,1]$ is a closed set in $mathbbR$. Hence $f in M$ so $M$ is a closed set in $C[0,1]$.



          (b) and (c): For any $g,h in M$ we have
          $$-1 = 0 - 1le g(x) - h(x) le 1 - 0 = 1$$
          so $$|g-h|_infty = sup_x in [0,1]|g(x) - h(x)| le 1$$



          It follows $delta(M) le 1$. On the other hand, we have $f, f_n in M$ so $$delta(f,M), delta(f_n, M) le delta(M) le 1$$



          Also plugging in $t = frac1sqrt[n-1]n$ gives
          $$delta(M) ge delta(f,M), delta(f_n, M) ge |f_n-f|_infty = sup_t in [0,1]|t^n - t| = sup_t in [0,1]|t||t^n-1 - 1| ge frac1sqrt[n-1]nleft(1 - frac1nright) xrightarrowntoinfty 1$$
          so we conclude $delta(f,M) = delta(f_n, M) = delta(M) = 1$.



          For (e):



          beginalign
          |g_n - Tg_n|_infty &= |T_ng_n - Tg_n|_infty \
          &= left|left(fracn-1n - 1right)Tg_n + fracf_0nright|_infty \
          &= left|-frac1n Tg_n + fracf_0nright|_infty \
          &= frac1n|f_0 - Tg_n|_infty
          endalign

          To conclude that this converges to $0$ we have to know what is $T$.






          share|cite|improve this answer











          $endgroup$












          • $begingroup$
            i tried something on (e) is it right and how to prove (d)...thank you so much
            $endgroup$
            – Inverse Problem
            Mar 24 at 16:03










          • $begingroup$
            @InverseProblem Can you tell me what exactly is $T$? How is $T_n$ defined?
            $endgroup$
            – mechanodroid
            Mar 24 at 16:05










          • $begingroup$
            @mechanodroid....you correct beacuse i also got same doubt let me check again any way thanks for your fast response...
            $endgroup$
            – Inverse Problem
            Mar 24 at 16:07










          • $begingroup$
            is my attempt is correct for (e)?
            $endgroup$
            – Inverse Problem
            Mar 24 at 16:08










          • $begingroup$
            @InverseProblem I'm still not sure what is $T$, I have added my attempt for $(e)$ in the answer.
            $endgroup$
            – mechanodroid
            Mar 24 at 16:18
















          2












          $begingroup$

          (a): Assume $(f_n)_n$ is a sequence in $M$ such that $f_n to f in C[0,1]$ uniformly. We claim that $f in M$.



          Since uniform convergence implies pointwise convergence, we have
          $$f(0) = lim_ntoinfty f_n(0) = lim_ntoinfty 0 = 0$$
          $$f(1) = lim_ntoinfty f_n(1) = lim_ntoinfty 1 = 1$$
          $$f(x) = lim_ntoinfty underbracef_n(x)_in[0,1] in [0,1], quadforall x in [0,1]$$
          since $[0,1]$ is a closed set in $mathbbR$. Hence $f in M$ so $M$ is a closed set in $C[0,1]$.



          (b) and (c): For any $g,h in M$ we have
          $$-1 = 0 - 1le g(x) - h(x) le 1 - 0 = 1$$
          so $$|g-h|_infty = sup_x in [0,1]|g(x) - h(x)| le 1$$



          It follows $delta(M) le 1$. On the other hand, we have $f, f_n in M$ so $$delta(f,M), delta(f_n, M) le delta(M) le 1$$



          Also plugging in $t = frac1sqrt[n-1]n$ gives
          $$delta(M) ge delta(f,M), delta(f_n, M) ge |f_n-f|_infty = sup_t in [0,1]|t^n - t| = sup_t in [0,1]|t||t^n-1 - 1| ge frac1sqrt[n-1]nleft(1 - frac1nright) xrightarrowntoinfty 1$$
          so we conclude $delta(f,M) = delta(f_n, M) = delta(M) = 1$.



          For (e):



          beginalign
          |g_n - Tg_n|_infty &= |T_ng_n - Tg_n|_infty \
          &= left|left(fracn-1n - 1right)Tg_n + fracf_0nright|_infty \
          &= left|-frac1n Tg_n + fracf_0nright|_infty \
          &= frac1n|f_0 - Tg_n|_infty
          endalign

          To conclude that this converges to $0$ we have to know what is $T$.






          share|cite|improve this answer











          $endgroup$












          • $begingroup$
            i tried something on (e) is it right and how to prove (d)...thank you so much
            $endgroup$
            – Inverse Problem
            Mar 24 at 16:03










          • $begingroup$
            @InverseProblem Can you tell me what exactly is $T$? How is $T_n$ defined?
            $endgroup$
            – mechanodroid
            Mar 24 at 16:05










          • $begingroup$
            @mechanodroid....you correct beacuse i also got same doubt let me check again any way thanks for your fast response...
            $endgroup$
            – Inverse Problem
            Mar 24 at 16:07










          • $begingroup$
            is my attempt is correct for (e)?
            $endgroup$
            – Inverse Problem
            Mar 24 at 16:08










          • $begingroup$
            @InverseProblem I'm still not sure what is $T$, I have added my attempt for $(e)$ in the answer.
            $endgroup$
            – mechanodroid
            Mar 24 at 16:18














          2












          2








          2





          $begingroup$

          (a): Assume $(f_n)_n$ is a sequence in $M$ such that $f_n to f in C[0,1]$ uniformly. We claim that $f in M$.



          Since uniform convergence implies pointwise convergence, we have
          $$f(0) = lim_ntoinfty f_n(0) = lim_ntoinfty 0 = 0$$
          $$f(1) = lim_ntoinfty f_n(1) = lim_ntoinfty 1 = 1$$
          $$f(x) = lim_ntoinfty underbracef_n(x)_in[0,1] in [0,1], quadforall x in [0,1]$$
          since $[0,1]$ is a closed set in $mathbbR$. Hence $f in M$ so $M$ is a closed set in $C[0,1]$.



          (b) and (c): For any $g,h in M$ we have
          $$-1 = 0 - 1le g(x) - h(x) le 1 - 0 = 1$$
          so $$|g-h|_infty = sup_x in [0,1]|g(x) - h(x)| le 1$$



          It follows $delta(M) le 1$. On the other hand, we have $f, f_n in M$ so $$delta(f,M), delta(f_n, M) le delta(M) le 1$$



          Also plugging in $t = frac1sqrt[n-1]n$ gives
          $$delta(M) ge delta(f,M), delta(f_n, M) ge |f_n-f|_infty = sup_t in [0,1]|t^n - t| = sup_t in [0,1]|t||t^n-1 - 1| ge frac1sqrt[n-1]nleft(1 - frac1nright) xrightarrowntoinfty 1$$
          so we conclude $delta(f,M) = delta(f_n, M) = delta(M) = 1$.



          For (e):



          beginalign
          |g_n - Tg_n|_infty &= |T_ng_n - Tg_n|_infty \
          &= left|left(fracn-1n - 1right)Tg_n + fracf_0nright|_infty \
          &= left|-frac1n Tg_n + fracf_0nright|_infty \
          &= frac1n|f_0 - Tg_n|_infty
          endalign

          To conclude that this converges to $0$ we have to know what is $T$.






          share|cite|improve this answer











          $endgroup$



          (a): Assume $(f_n)_n$ is a sequence in $M$ such that $f_n to f in C[0,1]$ uniformly. We claim that $f in M$.



          Since uniform convergence implies pointwise convergence, we have
          $$f(0) = lim_ntoinfty f_n(0) = lim_ntoinfty 0 = 0$$
          $$f(1) = lim_ntoinfty f_n(1) = lim_ntoinfty 1 = 1$$
          $$f(x) = lim_ntoinfty underbracef_n(x)_in[0,1] in [0,1], quadforall x in [0,1]$$
          since $[0,1]$ is a closed set in $mathbbR$. Hence $f in M$ so $M$ is a closed set in $C[0,1]$.



          (b) and (c): For any $g,h in M$ we have
          $$-1 = 0 - 1le g(x) - h(x) le 1 - 0 = 1$$
          so $$|g-h|_infty = sup_x in [0,1]|g(x) - h(x)| le 1$$



          It follows $delta(M) le 1$. On the other hand, we have $f, f_n in M$ so $$delta(f,M), delta(f_n, M) le delta(M) le 1$$



          Also plugging in $t = frac1sqrt[n-1]n$ gives
          $$delta(M) ge delta(f,M), delta(f_n, M) ge |f_n-f|_infty = sup_t in [0,1]|t^n - t| = sup_t in [0,1]|t||t^n-1 - 1| ge frac1sqrt[n-1]nleft(1 - frac1nright) xrightarrowntoinfty 1$$
          so we conclude $delta(f,M) = delta(f_n, M) = delta(M) = 1$.



          For (e):



          beginalign
          |g_n - Tg_n|_infty &= |T_ng_n - Tg_n|_infty \
          &= left|left(fracn-1n - 1right)Tg_n + fracf_0nright|_infty \
          &= left|-frac1n Tg_n + fracf_0nright|_infty \
          &= frac1n|f_0 - Tg_n|_infty
          endalign

          To conclude that this converges to $0$ we have to know what is $T$.







          share|cite|improve this answer














          share|cite|improve this answer



          share|cite|improve this answer








          edited Mar 24 at 16:17

























          answered Mar 24 at 15:47









          mechanodroidmechanodroid

          28.9k62648




          28.9k62648











          • $begingroup$
            i tried something on (e) is it right and how to prove (d)...thank you so much
            $endgroup$
            – Inverse Problem
            Mar 24 at 16:03










          • $begingroup$
            @InverseProblem Can you tell me what exactly is $T$? How is $T_n$ defined?
            $endgroup$
            – mechanodroid
            Mar 24 at 16:05










          • $begingroup$
            @mechanodroid....you correct beacuse i also got same doubt let me check again any way thanks for your fast response...
            $endgroup$
            – Inverse Problem
            Mar 24 at 16:07










          • $begingroup$
            is my attempt is correct for (e)?
            $endgroup$
            – Inverse Problem
            Mar 24 at 16:08










          • $begingroup$
            @InverseProblem I'm still not sure what is $T$, I have added my attempt for $(e)$ in the answer.
            $endgroup$
            – mechanodroid
            Mar 24 at 16:18

















          • $begingroup$
            i tried something on (e) is it right and how to prove (d)...thank you so much
            $endgroup$
            – Inverse Problem
            Mar 24 at 16:03










          • $begingroup$
            @InverseProblem Can you tell me what exactly is $T$? How is $T_n$ defined?
            $endgroup$
            – mechanodroid
            Mar 24 at 16:05










          • $begingroup$
            @mechanodroid....you correct beacuse i also got same doubt let me check again any way thanks for your fast response...
            $endgroup$
            – Inverse Problem
            Mar 24 at 16:07










          • $begingroup$
            is my attempt is correct for (e)?
            $endgroup$
            – Inverse Problem
            Mar 24 at 16:08










          • $begingroup$
            @InverseProblem I'm still not sure what is $T$, I have added my attempt for $(e)$ in the answer.
            $endgroup$
            – mechanodroid
            Mar 24 at 16:18
















          $begingroup$
          i tried something on (e) is it right and how to prove (d)...thank you so much
          $endgroup$
          – Inverse Problem
          Mar 24 at 16:03




          $begingroup$
          i tried something on (e) is it right and how to prove (d)...thank you so much
          $endgroup$
          – Inverse Problem
          Mar 24 at 16:03












          $begingroup$
          @InverseProblem Can you tell me what exactly is $T$? How is $T_n$ defined?
          $endgroup$
          – mechanodroid
          Mar 24 at 16:05




          $begingroup$
          @InverseProblem Can you tell me what exactly is $T$? How is $T_n$ defined?
          $endgroup$
          – mechanodroid
          Mar 24 at 16:05












          $begingroup$
          @mechanodroid....you correct beacuse i also got same doubt let me check again any way thanks for your fast response...
          $endgroup$
          – Inverse Problem
          Mar 24 at 16:07




          $begingroup$
          @mechanodroid....you correct beacuse i also got same doubt let me check again any way thanks for your fast response...
          $endgroup$
          – Inverse Problem
          Mar 24 at 16:07












          $begingroup$
          is my attempt is correct for (e)?
          $endgroup$
          – Inverse Problem
          Mar 24 at 16:08




          $begingroup$
          is my attempt is correct for (e)?
          $endgroup$
          – Inverse Problem
          Mar 24 at 16:08












          $begingroup$
          @InverseProblem I'm still not sure what is $T$, I have added my attempt for $(e)$ in the answer.
          $endgroup$
          – mechanodroid
          Mar 24 at 16:18





          $begingroup$
          @InverseProblem I'm still not sure what is $T$, I have added my attempt for $(e)$ in the answer.
          $endgroup$
          – mechanodroid
          Mar 24 at 16:18












          1












          $begingroup$

          Your subspace $M$ is the intersection of three closed sets
          $$
          M = f cap f : f(0)=0 cap f : f(1)=1 .
          $$

          The first set is closed because it is the closed unit ball of radius $1$ in $C_mathbbR[0,1]$. The second set is closed because it is the inverse image of $0$ under the continuous function $fin C_mathbbR[0,1] mapsto f(0)$. Similarly the third set is closed.






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$












          • $begingroup$
            Sir how to prove remaining problems
            $endgroup$
            – Inverse Problem
            Mar 24 at 1:09










          • $begingroup$
            @InverseProblem : What is $delta$?
            $endgroup$
            – DisintegratingByParts
            Mar 24 at 1:30










          • $begingroup$
            I defined in my question what is delta
            $endgroup$
            – Inverse Problem
            Mar 24 at 1:32










          • $begingroup$
            @InverseProblem : $M$ is not a subspace. o $delta(M)$ is not defined, and I don't see how distance relates to either.
            $endgroup$
            – DisintegratingByParts
            Mar 24 at 4:22






          • 1




            $begingroup$
            @InverseProblem : I'm just asking you to clarify your notation. I don't like the chat on this forum; it's poorly done.
            $endgroup$
            – DisintegratingByParts
            Mar 24 at 4:42















          1












          $begingroup$

          Your subspace $M$ is the intersection of three closed sets
          $$
          M = f cap f : f(0)=0 cap f : f(1)=1 .
          $$

          The first set is closed because it is the closed unit ball of radius $1$ in $C_mathbbR[0,1]$. The second set is closed because it is the inverse image of $0$ under the continuous function $fin C_mathbbR[0,1] mapsto f(0)$. Similarly the third set is closed.






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$












          • $begingroup$
            Sir how to prove remaining problems
            $endgroup$
            – Inverse Problem
            Mar 24 at 1:09










          • $begingroup$
            @InverseProblem : What is $delta$?
            $endgroup$
            – DisintegratingByParts
            Mar 24 at 1:30










          • $begingroup$
            I defined in my question what is delta
            $endgroup$
            – Inverse Problem
            Mar 24 at 1:32










          • $begingroup$
            @InverseProblem : $M$ is not a subspace. o $delta(M)$ is not defined, and I don't see how distance relates to either.
            $endgroup$
            – DisintegratingByParts
            Mar 24 at 4:22






          • 1




            $begingroup$
            @InverseProblem : I'm just asking you to clarify your notation. I don't like the chat on this forum; it's poorly done.
            $endgroup$
            – DisintegratingByParts
            Mar 24 at 4:42













          1












          1








          1





          $begingroup$

          Your subspace $M$ is the intersection of three closed sets
          $$
          M = f cap f : f(0)=0 cap f : f(1)=1 .
          $$

          The first set is closed because it is the closed unit ball of radius $1$ in $C_mathbbR[0,1]$. The second set is closed because it is the inverse image of $0$ under the continuous function $fin C_mathbbR[0,1] mapsto f(0)$. Similarly the third set is closed.






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$



          Your subspace $M$ is the intersection of three closed sets
          $$
          M = f cap f : f(0)=0 cap f : f(1)=1 .
          $$

          The first set is closed because it is the closed unit ball of radius $1$ in $C_mathbbR[0,1]$. The second set is closed because it is the inverse image of $0$ under the continuous function $fin C_mathbbR[0,1] mapsto f(0)$. Similarly the third set is closed.







          share|cite|improve this answer












          share|cite|improve this answer



          share|cite|improve this answer










          answered Mar 23 at 18:14









          DisintegratingByPartsDisintegratingByParts

          60.4k42681




          60.4k42681











          • $begingroup$
            Sir how to prove remaining problems
            $endgroup$
            – Inverse Problem
            Mar 24 at 1:09










          • $begingroup$
            @InverseProblem : What is $delta$?
            $endgroup$
            – DisintegratingByParts
            Mar 24 at 1:30










          • $begingroup$
            I defined in my question what is delta
            $endgroup$
            – Inverse Problem
            Mar 24 at 1:32










          • $begingroup$
            @InverseProblem : $M$ is not a subspace. o $delta(M)$ is not defined, and I don't see how distance relates to either.
            $endgroup$
            – DisintegratingByParts
            Mar 24 at 4:22






          • 1




            $begingroup$
            @InverseProblem : I'm just asking you to clarify your notation. I don't like the chat on this forum; it's poorly done.
            $endgroup$
            – DisintegratingByParts
            Mar 24 at 4:42
















          • $begingroup$
            Sir how to prove remaining problems
            $endgroup$
            – Inverse Problem
            Mar 24 at 1:09










          • $begingroup$
            @InverseProblem : What is $delta$?
            $endgroup$
            – DisintegratingByParts
            Mar 24 at 1:30










          • $begingroup$
            I defined in my question what is delta
            $endgroup$
            – Inverse Problem
            Mar 24 at 1:32










          • $begingroup$
            @InverseProblem : $M$ is not a subspace. o $delta(M)$ is not defined, and I don't see how distance relates to either.
            $endgroup$
            – DisintegratingByParts
            Mar 24 at 4:22






          • 1




            $begingroup$
            @InverseProblem : I'm just asking you to clarify your notation. I don't like the chat on this forum; it's poorly done.
            $endgroup$
            – DisintegratingByParts
            Mar 24 at 4:42















          $begingroup$
          Sir how to prove remaining problems
          $endgroup$
          – Inverse Problem
          Mar 24 at 1:09




          $begingroup$
          Sir how to prove remaining problems
          $endgroup$
          – Inverse Problem
          Mar 24 at 1:09












          $begingroup$
          @InverseProblem : What is $delta$?
          $endgroup$
          – DisintegratingByParts
          Mar 24 at 1:30




          $begingroup$
          @InverseProblem : What is $delta$?
          $endgroup$
          – DisintegratingByParts
          Mar 24 at 1:30












          $begingroup$
          I defined in my question what is delta
          $endgroup$
          – Inverse Problem
          Mar 24 at 1:32




          $begingroup$
          I defined in my question what is delta
          $endgroup$
          – Inverse Problem
          Mar 24 at 1:32












          $begingroup$
          @InverseProblem : $M$ is not a subspace. o $delta(M)$ is not defined, and I don't see how distance relates to either.
          $endgroup$
          – DisintegratingByParts
          Mar 24 at 4:22




          $begingroup$
          @InverseProblem : $M$ is not a subspace. o $delta(M)$ is not defined, and I don't see how distance relates to either.
          $endgroup$
          – DisintegratingByParts
          Mar 24 at 4:22




          1




          1




          $begingroup$
          @InverseProblem : I'm just asking you to clarify your notation. I don't like the chat on this forum; it's poorly done.
          $endgroup$
          – DisintegratingByParts
          Mar 24 at 4:42




          $begingroup$
          @InverseProblem : I'm just asking you to clarify your notation. I don't like the chat on this forum; it's poorly done.
          $endgroup$
          – DisintegratingByParts
          Mar 24 at 4:42











          1












          $begingroup$

          I'll try to give a more detailed proof of (a) because you'll probably see similar exercises and problems involving function spaces.



          Let $f_n$ be a sequence in $M$ such that $f_n to f$. So let us prove that $f in M$:




          • $f in C([0,1],mathbbR)$:

          Note that with this norm $f_n to f$ means uniform convergence of continuous functions, since by definition:
          beginequation*
          |f_n - f|_C([0,1],mathbbR) to 0 iffsup_tin[0,1] |f_n(t)-f(t)| to 0
          endequation*



          It is a well-known fact that uniform limit of continuous functions is also continuous.



          • $f(0) = 0$ and $f(1) = 1$: It should be clear from the sequence.


          • $0 leq f(t) leq 1$ for all $tin[0,1]$:


          Suppose that $f(t_0) < 0$ for some $t_0in[0,1]$; then there is $varepsilon > 0$ such that $f(t_0) +varepsilon < 0$.



          Since $f_n$ converges to $f$ uniformly, then it also converges pointwise. Hence for $n > n_0$ (for $n_0$ big enough), we have:
          begingather
          |f_n(t_0)-f(t_0)| < varepsilon \
          -varepsilon < f_n(t_0)-f(t_0) < varepsilon \
          f(t_0)-varepsilon < f_n(t_0) < f(t_0)+varepsilon < 0\
          endgather



          This contradicts the fact that $f_n in M$ (that is, $f_n(t) geq 0$ for all $tin[0,1]$). The same reasoning can be applied to prove that $f(t) leq 1$.



          Hence $f in M$, and $M$ is closed.



          Remark 1: Note that we had to check that $f in C([0,1],mathbbR)$. It is an important step (albeit most of the time it'll be satisfied).



          Remark 2: For convergence of the sequence, generally you need to apply a convergence theorem (uniform limit, Arzelà-Áscoli, Lebesgue's Dominated Convergence, among others). That's one of the reasons you learn them!






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$












          • $begingroup$
            can you know how to solve remaining questions
            $endgroup$
            – Inverse Problem
            Mar 24 at 3:32















          1












          $begingroup$

          I'll try to give a more detailed proof of (a) because you'll probably see similar exercises and problems involving function spaces.



          Let $f_n$ be a sequence in $M$ such that $f_n to f$. So let us prove that $f in M$:




          • $f in C([0,1],mathbbR)$:

          Note that with this norm $f_n to f$ means uniform convergence of continuous functions, since by definition:
          beginequation*
          |f_n - f|_C([0,1],mathbbR) to 0 iffsup_tin[0,1] |f_n(t)-f(t)| to 0
          endequation*



          It is a well-known fact that uniform limit of continuous functions is also continuous.



          • $f(0) = 0$ and $f(1) = 1$: It should be clear from the sequence.


          • $0 leq f(t) leq 1$ for all $tin[0,1]$:


          Suppose that $f(t_0) < 0$ for some $t_0in[0,1]$; then there is $varepsilon > 0$ such that $f(t_0) +varepsilon < 0$.



          Since $f_n$ converges to $f$ uniformly, then it also converges pointwise. Hence for $n > n_0$ (for $n_0$ big enough), we have:
          begingather
          |f_n(t_0)-f(t_0)| < varepsilon \
          -varepsilon < f_n(t_0)-f(t_0) < varepsilon \
          f(t_0)-varepsilon < f_n(t_0) < f(t_0)+varepsilon < 0\
          endgather



          This contradicts the fact that $f_n in M$ (that is, $f_n(t) geq 0$ for all $tin[0,1]$). The same reasoning can be applied to prove that $f(t) leq 1$.



          Hence $f in M$, and $M$ is closed.



          Remark 1: Note that we had to check that $f in C([0,1],mathbbR)$. It is an important step (albeit most of the time it'll be satisfied).



          Remark 2: For convergence of the sequence, generally you need to apply a convergence theorem (uniform limit, Arzelà-Áscoli, Lebesgue's Dominated Convergence, among others). That's one of the reasons you learn them!






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$












          • $begingroup$
            can you know how to solve remaining questions
            $endgroup$
            – Inverse Problem
            Mar 24 at 3:32













          1












          1








          1





          $begingroup$

          I'll try to give a more detailed proof of (a) because you'll probably see similar exercises and problems involving function spaces.



          Let $f_n$ be a sequence in $M$ such that $f_n to f$. So let us prove that $f in M$:




          • $f in C([0,1],mathbbR)$:

          Note that with this norm $f_n to f$ means uniform convergence of continuous functions, since by definition:
          beginequation*
          |f_n - f|_C([0,1],mathbbR) to 0 iffsup_tin[0,1] |f_n(t)-f(t)| to 0
          endequation*



          It is a well-known fact that uniform limit of continuous functions is also continuous.



          • $f(0) = 0$ and $f(1) = 1$: It should be clear from the sequence.


          • $0 leq f(t) leq 1$ for all $tin[0,1]$:


          Suppose that $f(t_0) < 0$ for some $t_0in[0,1]$; then there is $varepsilon > 0$ such that $f(t_0) +varepsilon < 0$.



          Since $f_n$ converges to $f$ uniformly, then it also converges pointwise. Hence for $n > n_0$ (for $n_0$ big enough), we have:
          begingather
          |f_n(t_0)-f(t_0)| < varepsilon \
          -varepsilon < f_n(t_0)-f(t_0) < varepsilon \
          f(t_0)-varepsilon < f_n(t_0) < f(t_0)+varepsilon < 0\
          endgather



          This contradicts the fact that $f_n in M$ (that is, $f_n(t) geq 0$ for all $tin[0,1]$). The same reasoning can be applied to prove that $f(t) leq 1$.



          Hence $f in M$, and $M$ is closed.



          Remark 1: Note that we had to check that $f in C([0,1],mathbbR)$. It is an important step (albeit most of the time it'll be satisfied).



          Remark 2: For convergence of the sequence, generally you need to apply a convergence theorem (uniform limit, Arzelà-Áscoli, Lebesgue's Dominated Convergence, among others). That's one of the reasons you learn them!






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$



          I'll try to give a more detailed proof of (a) because you'll probably see similar exercises and problems involving function spaces.



          Let $f_n$ be a sequence in $M$ such that $f_n to f$. So let us prove that $f in M$:




          • $f in C([0,1],mathbbR)$:

          Note that with this norm $f_n to f$ means uniform convergence of continuous functions, since by definition:
          beginequation*
          |f_n - f|_C([0,1],mathbbR) to 0 iffsup_tin[0,1] |f_n(t)-f(t)| to 0
          endequation*



          It is a well-known fact that uniform limit of continuous functions is also continuous.



          • $f(0) = 0$ and $f(1) = 1$: It should be clear from the sequence.


          • $0 leq f(t) leq 1$ for all $tin[0,1]$:


          Suppose that $f(t_0) < 0$ for some $t_0in[0,1]$; then there is $varepsilon > 0$ such that $f(t_0) +varepsilon < 0$.



          Since $f_n$ converges to $f$ uniformly, then it also converges pointwise. Hence for $n > n_0$ (for $n_0$ big enough), we have:
          begingather
          |f_n(t_0)-f(t_0)| < varepsilon \
          -varepsilon < f_n(t_0)-f(t_0) < varepsilon \
          f(t_0)-varepsilon < f_n(t_0) < f(t_0)+varepsilon < 0\
          endgather



          This contradicts the fact that $f_n in M$ (that is, $f_n(t) geq 0$ for all $tin[0,1]$). The same reasoning can be applied to prove that $f(t) leq 1$.



          Hence $f in M$, and $M$ is closed.



          Remark 1: Note that we had to check that $f in C([0,1],mathbbR)$. It is an important step (albeit most of the time it'll be satisfied).



          Remark 2: For convergence of the sequence, generally you need to apply a convergence theorem (uniform limit, Arzelà-Áscoli, Lebesgue's Dominated Convergence, among others). That's one of the reasons you learn them!







          share|cite|improve this answer












          share|cite|improve this answer



          share|cite|improve this answer










          answered Mar 23 at 18:22









          AspiringMathematicianAspiringMathematician

          1,878621




          1,878621











          • $begingroup$
            can you know how to solve remaining questions
            $endgroup$
            – Inverse Problem
            Mar 24 at 3:32
















          • $begingroup$
            can you know how to solve remaining questions
            $endgroup$
            – Inverse Problem
            Mar 24 at 3:32















          $begingroup$
          can you know how to solve remaining questions
          $endgroup$
          – Inverse Problem
          Mar 24 at 3:32




          $begingroup$
          can you know how to solve remaining questions
          $endgroup$
          – Inverse Problem
          Mar 24 at 3:32

















          draft saved

          draft discarded
















































          Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

          But avoid


          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

          Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




          draft saved


          draft discarded














          StackExchange.ready(
          function ()
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3159556%2fdiameters-distances-and-contraction-mappings-on-a-subset-of-c-mathbbr0-1%23new-answer', 'question_page');

          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown





















































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown

































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown







          Popular posts from this blog

          Lowndes Grove History Architecture References Navigation menu32°48′6″N 79°57′58″W / 32.80167°N 79.96611°W / 32.80167; -79.9661132°48′6″N 79°57′58″W / 32.80167°N 79.96611°W / 32.80167; -79.9661178002500"National Register Information System"Historic houses of South Carolina"Lowndes Grove""+32° 48' 6.00", −79° 57' 58.00""Lowndes Grove, Charleston County (260 St. Margaret St., Charleston)""Lowndes Grove"The Charleston ExpositionIt Happened in South Carolina"Lowndes Grove (House), Saint Margaret Street & Sixth Avenue, Charleston, Charleston County, SC(Photographs)"Plantations of the Carolina Low Countrye

          random experiment with two different functions on unit interval Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara Planned maintenance scheduled April 23, 2019 at 00:00UTC (8:00pm US/Eastern)Random variable and probability space notionsRandom Walk with EdgesFinding functions where the increase over a random interval is Poisson distributedNumber of days until dayCan an observed event in fact be of zero probability?Unit random processmodels of coins and uniform distributionHow to get the number of successes given $n$ trials , probability $P$ and a random variable $X$Absorbing Markov chain in a computer. Is “almost every” turned into always convergence in computer executions?Stopped random walk is not uniformly integrable

          How should I support this large drywall patch? Planned maintenance scheduled April 23, 2019 at 00:00UTC (8:00pm US/Eastern) Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara Unicorn Meta Zoo #1: Why another podcast?How do I cover large gaps in drywall?How do I keep drywall around a patch from crumbling?Can I glue a second layer of drywall?How to patch long strip on drywall?Large drywall patch: how to avoid bulging seams?Drywall Mesh Patch vs. Bulge? To remove or not to remove?How to fix this drywall job?Prep drywall before backsplashWhat's the best way to fix this horrible drywall patch job?Drywall patching using 3M Patch Plus Primer