How to solve for $x$ in an equation such as “$2x^2 - 5x + 64log(x) + 776 = 0$”? Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara Planned maintenance scheduled April 17/18, 2019 at 00:00UTC (8:00pm US/Eastern)How to solve equations of this form: $x^x = n$?Solving log equationHow to solve $5000 n log(n) leq 2^n/2$Solve trigonometric equation for xHow to Solve $2.3856 + log r = log(364r - 363)$solve $log m = log n + 3/2 log (1 + v/m^2)$ for mHow to solve a nonlinear equation?Solving for different variablesSolve an equation for $a$Solving the equation $2^x+2^-x = 10$

How to find out what spells would be useless to a blind NPC spellcaster?

Why did the rest of the Eastern Bloc not invade Yugoslavia?

Is it ethical to give a final exam after the professor has quit before teaching the remaining chapters of the course?

String `!23` is replaced with `docker` in command line

How to answer "Have you ever been terminated?"

What LEGO pieces have "real-world" functionality?

Is it true that "carbohydrates are of no use for the basal metabolic need"?

What exactly is a "Meth" in Altered Carbon?

How discoverable are IPv6 addresses and AAAA names by potential attackers?

What causes the vertical darker bands in my photo?

The logistics of corpse disposal

How to find all the available tools in macOS terminal?

Is there a (better) way to access $wpdb results?

Coloring maths inside a tcolorbox

What does this icon in iOS Stardew Valley mean?

Denied boarding although I have proper visa and documentation. To whom should I make a complaint?

What is Arya's weapon design?

Why did the IBM 650 use bi-quinary?

ListPlot join points by nearest neighbor rather than order

What's the meaning of 間時肆拾貳 at a car parking sign

In predicate logic, does existential quantification (∃) include universal quantification (∀), i.e. can 'some' imply 'all'?

When do you get frequent flier miles - when you buy, or when you fly?

List of Python versions

Overriding an object in memory with placement new



How to solve for $x$ in an equation such as “$2x^2 - 5x + 64log(x) + 776 = 0$”?



Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara
Planned maintenance scheduled April 17/18, 2019 at 00:00UTC (8:00pm US/Eastern)How to solve equations of this form: $x^x = n$?Solving log equationHow to solve $5000 n log(n) leq 2^n/2$Solve trigonometric equation for xHow to Solve $2.3856 + log r = log(364r - 363)$solve $log m = log n + 3/2 log (1 + v/m^2)$ for mHow to solve a nonlinear equation?Solving for different variablesSolve an equation for $a$Solving the equation $2^x+2^-x = 10$










1












$begingroup$


I'm trying to find the shortest distance between a point and a logarithmic line. So far I've applied the distance formula, found the derivative of the distance equation and made it equal to zero. That's how I got the equation in the title: $$2x^2 - 5x + 64log(x) + 776 = 0.$$ From this point I haven't been able to figure out how to solve for $x$. So the question is, how to I solve for $x$ in this equation?










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$







  • 1




    $begingroup$
    I’m pretty sure that many of these types of equations can not be solved algebraically. This isn’t to say that your solution does not have one, just to say it is not guaranteed to have one.
    $endgroup$
    – H Huang
    Mar 26 at 16:29











  • $begingroup$
    Alright, thanks for the answer.
    $endgroup$
    – Steinar Sindri Agnarsson
    Mar 26 at 16:31










  • $begingroup$
    I am writing an answer that suggests how we can analytically find a root. Should I post it?
    $endgroup$
    – астон вілла олоф мэллбэрг
    Mar 26 at 16:32











  • $begingroup$
    You will need a numerical method, e.g. Newton -Raphson method
    $endgroup$
    – Dr. Sonnhard Graubner
    Mar 26 at 16:35










  • $begingroup$
    We find $$xapprox 5.42225066756636430174*10^-6$$
    $endgroup$
    – Dr. Sonnhard Graubner
    Mar 26 at 16:36















1












$begingroup$


I'm trying to find the shortest distance between a point and a logarithmic line. So far I've applied the distance formula, found the derivative of the distance equation and made it equal to zero. That's how I got the equation in the title: $$2x^2 - 5x + 64log(x) + 776 = 0.$$ From this point I haven't been able to figure out how to solve for $x$. So the question is, how to I solve for $x$ in this equation?










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$







  • 1




    $begingroup$
    I’m pretty sure that many of these types of equations can not be solved algebraically. This isn’t to say that your solution does not have one, just to say it is not guaranteed to have one.
    $endgroup$
    – H Huang
    Mar 26 at 16:29











  • $begingroup$
    Alright, thanks for the answer.
    $endgroup$
    – Steinar Sindri Agnarsson
    Mar 26 at 16:31










  • $begingroup$
    I am writing an answer that suggests how we can analytically find a root. Should I post it?
    $endgroup$
    – астон вілла олоф мэллбэрг
    Mar 26 at 16:32











  • $begingroup$
    You will need a numerical method, e.g. Newton -Raphson method
    $endgroup$
    – Dr. Sonnhard Graubner
    Mar 26 at 16:35










  • $begingroup$
    We find $$xapprox 5.42225066756636430174*10^-6$$
    $endgroup$
    – Dr. Sonnhard Graubner
    Mar 26 at 16:36













1












1








1





$begingroup$


I'm trying to find the shortest distance between a point and a logarithmic line. So far I've applied the distance formula, found the derivative of the distance equation and made it equal to zero. That's how I got the equation in the title: $$2x^2 - 5x + 64log(x) + 776 = 0.$$ From this point I haven't been able to figure out how to solve for $x$. So the question is, how to I solve for $x$ in this equation?










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$




I'm trying to find the shortest distance between a point and a logarithmic line. So far I've applied the distance formula, found the derivative of the distance equation and made it equal to zero. That's how I got the equation in the title: $$2x^2 - 5x + 64log(x) + 776 = 0.$$ From this point I haven't been able to figure out how to solve for $x$. So the question is, how to I solve for $x$ in this equation?







algebra-precalculus






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited Mar 26 at 16:29







Steinar Sindri Agnarsson

















asked Mar 26 at 16:23









Steinar Sindri AgnarssonSteinar Sindri Agnarsson

84




84







  • 1




    $begingroup$
    I’m pretty sure that many of these types of equations can not be solved algebraically. This isn’t to say that your solution does not have one, just to say it is not guaranteed to have one.
    $endgroup$
    – H Huang
    Mar 26 at 16:29











  • $begingroup$
    Alright, thanks for the answer.
    $endgroup$
    – Steinar Sindri Agnarsson
    Mar 26 at 16:31










  • $begingroup$
    I am writing an answer that suggests how we can analytically find a root. Should I post it?
    $endgroup$
    – астон вілла олоф мэллбэрг
    Mar 26 at 16:32











  • $begingroup$
    You will need a numerical method, e.g. Newton -Raphson method
    $endgroup$
    – Dr. Sonnhard Graubner
    Mar 26 at 16:35










  • $begingroup$
    We find $$xapprox 5.42225066756636430174*10^-6$$
    $endgroup$
    – Dr. Sonnhard Graubner
    Mar 26 at 16:36












  • 1




    $begingroup$
    I’m pretty sure that many of these types of equations can not be solved algebraically. This isn’t to say that your solution does not have one, just to say it is not guaranteed to have one.
    $endgroup$
    – H Huang
    Mar 26 at 16:29











  • $begingroup$
    Alright, thanks for the answer.
    $endgroup$
    – Steinar Sindri Agnarsson
    Mar 26 at 16:31










  • $begingroup$
    I am writing an answer that suggests how we can analytically find a root. Should I post it?
    $endgroup$
    – астон вілла олоф мэллбэрг
    Mar 26 at 16:32











  • $begingroup$
    You will need a numerical method, e.g. Newton -Raphson method
    $endgroup$
    – Dr. Sonnhard Graubner
    Mar 26 at 16:35










  • $begingroup$
    We find $$xapprox 5.42225066756636430174*10^-6$$
    $endgroup$
    – Dr. Sonnhard Graubner
    Mar 26 at 16:36







1




1




$begingroup$
I’m pretty sure that many of these types of equations can not be solved algebraically. This isn’t to say that your solution does not have one, just to say it is not guaranteed to have one.
$endgroup$
– H Huang
Mar 26 at 16:29





$begingroup$
I’m pretty sure that many of these types of equations can not be solved algebraically. This isn’t to say that your solution does not have one, just to say it is not guaranteed to have one.
$endgroup$
– H Huang
Mar 26 at 16:29













$begingroup$
Alright, thanks for the answer.
$endgroup$
– Steinar Sindri Agnarsson
Mar 26 at 16:31




$begingroup$
Alright, thanks for the answer.
$endgroup$
– Steinar Sindri Agnarsson
Mar 26 at 16:31












$begingroup$
I am writing an answer that suggests how we can analytically find a root. Should I post it?
$endgroup$
– астон вілла олоф мэллбэрг
Mar 26 at 16:32





$begingroup$
I am writing an answer that suggests how we can analytically find a root. Should I post it?
$endgroup$
– астон вілла олоф мэллбэрг
Mar 26 at 16:32













$begingroup$
You will need a numerical method, e.g. Newton -Raphson method
$endgroup$
– Dr. Sonnhard Graubner
Mar 26 at 16:35




$begingroup$
You will need a numerical method, e.g. Newton -Raphson method
$endgroup$
– Dr. Sonnhard Graubner
Mar 26 at 16:35












$begingroup$
We find $$xapprox 5.42225066756636430174*10^-6$$
$endgroup$
– Dr. Sonnhard Graubner
Mar 26 at 16:36




$begingroup$
We find $$xapprox 5.42225066756636430174*10^-6$$
$endgroup$
– Dr. Sonnhard Graubner
Mar 26 at 16:36










2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes


















0












$begingroup$

I am pretty sure that it is impossible to solve for the equation algebraically. Let $f(x) = 2x^2 - 5x +64log x+776$. We are trying to find when $f(x) = 0$. Note that the domain of $f$ is $(0,infty)$ because of the logarithm( which I assume is the natural logarithm i.e. to the base $e$).



Going for it analytically, first we note that the derivative is $f' = 4x + frac64x - 5 = frac4x^2 - 5x+64x$ which is strictly positive on $(0,infty)$ since the numerator has discriminant negative , hence is always positive, while the denominator is always positive.



Also, from the fact that $f(x) to -infty$ as $x to 0^+$ and $f(1) >0$, we see that any root is between $0$ and $1$.



We can actually do better : note that if $x = e^y$, where $y < 0$ since we now want $0<x<1$, then we have : $$2x^2 - 5x = 2(x^2 - 2.5x) = 2((x-1.25)^2) - frac258$$



Therefore, we see that on $[0,1]$ that this part is between $0$ and $-3$.



So if equality holds, then in particular, $64y + 776$ is between $0$ and $3$, so we get $frac-77664 leq y leq frac-77364$, which after exponentiation gives $ 5.422leq 10^6x leq 5.682$. At least we get the number of significant zeros and the first significant non-zero digit, using at most two exponential operations.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    Thanks for a great explanation!
    $endgroup$
    – Steinar Sindri Agnarsson
    Mar 26 at 16:59










  • $begingroup$
    You are welcome! Since you are new, up vote any answers you like, and accept the best answer so you can close the question.
    $endgroup$
    – астон вілла олоф мэллбэрг
    Mar 26 at 17:01



















1












$begingroup$

first the derivation of this equation is greater than zero



$y=2x^2-5x+64log(x)+776$ so $fracdydx=4x-5+frac64x=frac4x^2-5x+64x$ in $4x^2-5x+64geq 0$ since $Delta leq 0$ so always $fracdydx>0$



also $y(0^+)=-infty$ and there are some $ygeq 0$ so you have a one root and no more. (since $y$ is increasing and exist $a$ and $b$ such that $f(a)f(b)<0$و Intermediate value theorem)



R code



 y<-function(x)
2*x^2-5*x+64*log(x)+776

uniroot(y,c(5.414414e-06,5.423423e-06))
$root
[1] 5.423423e-06

$f.root
[1] 0.01383579

$iter
[1] 0

$init.it
[1] NA

$estim.prec
[1] 9.009e-09


so you sure have a unique answer






share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    better answer use uniroot(y,lower =5.1e-06 , upper = 5.6e-06,tol=10^(-30))
    $endgroup$
    – masoud
    Mar 26 at 17:16











Your Answer








StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);

else
createEditor();

);

function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);



);













draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3163416%2fhow-to-solve-for-x-in-an-equation-such-as-2x2-5x-64-logx-776-0%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes








2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes









0












$begingroup$

I am pretty sure that it is impossible to solve for the equation algebraically. Let $f(x) = 2x^2 - 5x +64log x+776$. We are trying to find when $f(x) = 0$. Note that the domain of $f$ is $(0,infty)$ because of the logarithm( which I assume is the natural logarithm i.e. to the base $e$).



Going for it analytically, first we note that the derivative is $f' = 4x + frac64x - 5 = frac4x^2 - 5x+64x$ which is strictly positive on $(0,infty)$ since the numerator has discriminant negative , hence is always positive, while the denominator is always positive.



Also, from the fact that $f(x) to -infty$ as $x to 0^+$ and $f(1) >0$, we see that any root is between $0$ and $1$.



We can actually do better : note that if $x = e^y$, where $y < 0$ since we now want $0<x<1$, then we have : $$2x^2 - 5x = 2(x^2 - 2.5x) = 2((x-1.25)^2) - frac258$$



Therefore, we see that on $[0,1]$ that this part is between $0$ and $-3$.



So if equality holds, then in particular, $64y + 776$ is between $0$ and $3$, so we get $frac-77664 leq y leq frac-77364$, which after exponentiation gives $ 5.422leq 10^6x leq 5.682$. At least we get the number of significant zeros and the first significant non-zero digit, using at most two exponential operations.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    Thanks for a great explanation!
    $endgroup$
    – Steinar Sindri Agnarsson
    Mar 26 at 16:59










  • $begingroup$
    You are welcome! Since you are new, up vote any answers you like, and accept the best answer so you can close the question.
    $endgroup$
    – астон вілла олоф мэллбэрг
    Mar 26 at 17:01
















0












$begingroup$

I am pretty sure that it is impossible to solve for the equation algebraically. Let $f(x) = 2x^2 - 5x +64log x+776$. We are trying to find when $f(x) = 0$. Note that the domain of $f$ is $(0,infty)$ because of the logarithm( which I assume is the natural logarithm i.e. to the base $e$).



Going for it analytically, first we note that the derivative is $f' = 4x + frac64x - 5 = frac4x^2 - 5x+64x$ which is strictly positive on $(0,infty)$ since the numerator has discriminant negative , hence is always positive, while the denominator is always positive.



Also, from the fact that $f(x) to -infty$ as $x to 0^+$ and $f(1) >0$, we see that any root is between $0$ and $1$.



We can actually do better : note that if $x = e^y$, where $y < 0$ since we now want $0<x<1$, then we have : $$2x^2 - 5x = 2(x^2 - 2.5x) = 2((x-1.25)^2) - frac258$$



Therefore, we see that on $[0,1]$ that this part is between $0$ and $-3$.



So if equality holds, then in particular, $64y + 776$ is between $0$ and $3$, so we get $frac-77664 leq y leq frac-77364$, which after exponentiation gives $ 5.422leq 10^6x leq 5.682$. At least we get the number of significant zeros and the first significant non-zero digit, using at most two exponential operations.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    Thanks for a great explanation!
    $endgroup$
    – Steinar Sindri Agnarsson
    Mar 26 at 16:59










  • $begingroup$
    You are welcome! Since you are new, up vote any answers you like, and accept the best answer so you can close the question.
    $endgroup$
    – астон вілла олоф мэллбэрг
    Mar 26 at 17:01














0












0








0





$begingroup$

I am pretty sure that it is impossible to solve for the equation algebraically. Let $f(x) = 2x^2 - 5x +64log x+776$. We are trying to find when $f(x) = 0$. Note that the domain of $f$ is $(0,infty)$ because of the logarithm( which I assume is the natural logarithm i.e. to the base $e$).



Going for it analytically, first we note that the derivative is $f' = 4x + frac64x - 5 = frac4x^2 - 5x+64x$ which is strictly positive on $(0,infty)$ since the numerator has discriminant negative , hence is always positive, while the denominator is always positive.



Also, from the fact that $f(x) to -infty$ as $x to 0^+$ and $f(1) >0$, we see that any root is between $0$ and $1$.



We can actually do better : note that if $x = e^y$, where $y < 0$ since we now want $0<x<1$, then we have : $$2x^2 - 5x = 2(x^2 - 2.5x) = 2((x-1.25)^2) - frac258$$



Therefore, we see that on $[0,1]$ that this part is between $0$ and $-3$.



So if equality holds, then in particular, $64y + 776$ is between $0$ and $3$, so we get $frac-77664 leq y leq frac-77364$, which after exponentiation gives $ 5.422leq 10^6x leq 5.682$. At least we get the number of significant zeros and the first significant non-zero digit, using at most two exponential operations.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$



I am pretty sure that it is impossible to solve for the equation algebraically. Let $f(x) = 2x^2 - 5x +64log x+776$. We are trying to find when $f(x) = 0$. Note that the domain of $f$ is $(0,infty)$ because of the logarithm( which I assume is the natural logarithm i.e. to the base $e$).



Going for it analytically, first we note that the derivative is $f' = 4x + frac64x - 5 = frac4x^2 - 5x+64x$ which is strictly positive on $(0,infty)$ since the numerator has discriminant negative , hence is always positive, while the denominator is always positive.



Also, from the fact that $f(x) to -infty$ as $x to 0^+$ and $f(1) >0$, we see that any root is between $0$ and $1$.



We can actually do better : note that if $x = e^y$, where $y < 0$ since we now want $0<x<1$, then we have : $$2x^2 - 5x = 2(x^2 - 2.5x) = 2((x-1.25)^2) - frac258$$



Therefore, we see that on $[0,1]$ that this part is between $0$ and $-3$.



So if equality holds, then in particular, $64y + 776$ is between $0$ and $3$, so we get $frac-77664 leq y leq frac-77364$, which after exponentiation gives $ 5.422leq 10^6x leq 5.682$. At least we get the number of significant zeros and the first significant non-zero digit, using at most two exponential operations.







share|cite|improve this answer












share|cite|improve this answer



share|cite|improve this answer










answered Mar 26 at 16:53









астон вілла олоф мэллбэргастон вілла олоф мэллбэрг

40.6k33678




40.6k33678











  • $begingroup$
    Thanks for a great explanation!
    $endgroup$
    – Steinar Sindri Agnarsson
    Mar 26 at 16:59










  • $begingroup$
    You are welcome! Since you are new, up vote any answers you like, and accept the best answer so you can close the question.
    $endgroup$
    – астон вілла олоф мэллбэрг
    Mar 26 at 17:01

















  • $begingroup$
    Thanks for a great explanation!
    $endgroup$
    – Steinar Sindri Agnarsson
    Mar 26 at 16:59










  • $begingroup$
    You are welcome! Since you are new, up vote any answers you like, and accept the best answer so you can close the question.
    $endgroup$
    – астон вілла олоф мэллбэрг
    Mar 26 at 17:01
















$begingroup$
Thanks for a great explanation!
$endgroup$
– Steinar Sindri Agnarsson
Mar 26 at 16:59




$begingroup$
Thanks for a great explanation!
$endgroup$
– Steinar Sindri Agnarsson
Mar 26 at 16:59












$begingroup$
You are welcome! Since you are new, up vote any answers you like, and accept the best answer so you can close the question.
$endgroup$
– астон вілла олоф мэллбэрг
Mar 26 at 17:01





$begingroup$
You are welcome! Since you are new, up vote any answers you like, and accept the best answer so you can close the question.
$endgroup$
– астон вілла олоф мэллбэрг
Mar 26 at 17:01












1












$begingroup$

first the derivation of this equation is greater than zero



$y=2x^2-5x+64log(x)+776$ so $fracdydx=4x-5+frac64x=frac4x^2-5x+64x$ in $4x^2-5x+64geq 0$ since $Delta leq 0$ so always $fracdydx>0$



also $y(0^+)=-infty$ and there are some $ygeq 0$ so you have a one root and no more. (since $y$ is increasing and exist $a$ and $b$ such that $f(a)f(b)<0$و Intermediate value theorem)



R code



 y<-function(x)
2*x^2-5*x+64*log(x)+776

uniroot(y,c(5.414414e-06,5.423423e-06))
$root
[1] 5.423423e-06

$f.root
[1] 0.01383579

$iter
[1] 0

$init.it
[1] NA

$estim.prec
[1] 9.009e-09


so you sure have a unique answer






share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    better answer use uniroot(y,lower =5.1e-06 , upper = 5.6e-06,tol=10^(-30))
    $endgroup$
    – masoud
    Mar 26 at 17:16















1












$begingroup$

first the derivation of this equation is greater than zero



$y=2x^2-5x+64log(x)+776$ so $fracdydx=4x-5+frac64x=frac4x^2-5x+64x$ in $4x^2-5x+64geq 0$ since $Delta leq 0$ so always $fracdydx>0$



also $y(0^+)=-infty$ and there are some $ygeq 0$ so you have a one root and no more. (since $y$ is increasing and exist $a$ and $b$ such that $f(a)f(b)<0$و Intermediate value theorem)



R code



 y<-function(x)
2*x^2-5*x+64*log(x)+776

uniroot(y,c(5.414414e-06,5.423423e-06))
$root
[1] 5.423423e-06

$f.root
[1] 0.01383579

$iter
[1] 0

$init.it
[1] NA

$estim.prec
[1] 9.009e-09


so you sure have a unique answer






share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    better answer use uniroot(y,lower =5.1e-06 , upper = 5.6e-06,tol=10^(-30))
    $endgroup$
    – masoud
    Mar 26 at 17:16













1












1








1





$begingroup$

first the derivation of this equation is greater than zero



$y=2x^2-5x+64log(x)+776$ so $fracdydx=4x-5+frac64x=frac4x^2-5x+64x$ in $4x^2-5x+64geq 0$ since $Delta leq 0$ so always $fracdydx>0$



also $y(0^+)=-infty$ and there are some $ygeq 0$ so you have a one root and no more. (since $y$ is increasing and exist $a$ and $b$ such that $f(a)f(b)<0$و Intermediate value theorem)



R code



 y<-function(x)
2*x^2-5*x+64*log(x)+776

uniroot(y,c(5.414414e-06,5.423423e-06))
$root
[1] 5.423423e-06

$f.root
[1] 0.01383579

$iter
[1] 0

$init.it
[1] NA

$estim.prec
[1] 9.009e-09


so you sure have a unique answer






share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$



first the derivation of this equation is greater than zero



$y=2x^2-5x+64log(x)+776$ so $fracdydx=4x-5+frac64x=frac4x^2-5x+64x$ in $4x^2-5x+64geq 0$ since $Delta leq 0$ so always $fracdydx>0$



also $y(0^+)=-infty$ and there are some $ygeq 0$ so you have a one root and no more. (since $y$ is increasing and exist $a$ and $b$ such that $f(a)f(b)<0$و Intermediate value theorem)



R code



 y<-function(x)
2*x^2-5*x+64*log(x)+776

uniroot(y,c(5.414414e-06,5.423423e-06))
$root
[1] 5.423423e-06

$f.root
[1] 0.01383579

$iter
[1] 0

$init.it
[1] NA

$estim.prec
[1] 9.009e-09


so you sure have a unique answer







share|cite|improve this answer














share|cite|improve this answer



share|cite|improve this answer








edited Mar 26 at 16:51

























answered Mar 26 at 16:46









masoudmasoud

32218




32218











  • $begingroup$
    better answer use uniroot(y,lower =5.1e-06 , upper = 5.6e-06,tol=10^(-30))
    $endgroup$
    – masoud
    Mar 26 at 17:16
















  • $begingroup$
    better answer use uniroot(y,lower =5.1e-06 , upper = 5.6e-06,tol=10^(-30))
    $endgroup$
    – masoud
    Mar 26 at 17:16















$begingroup$
better answer use uniroot(y,lower =5.1e-06 , upper = 5.6e-06,tol=10^(-30))
$endgroup$
– masoud
Mar 26 at 17:16




$begingroup$
better answer use uniroot(y,lower =5.1e-06 , upper = 5.6e-06,tol=10^(-30))
$endgroup$
– masoud
Mar 26 at 17:16

















draft saved

draft discarded
















































Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid


  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3163416%2fhow-to-solve-for-x-in-an-equation-such-as-2x2-5x-64-logx-776-0%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

Moe incest case Sentencing See also References Navigation menu"'Australian Josef Fritzl' fathered four children by daughter""Small town recoils in horror at 'Australian Fritzl' incest case""Victorian rape allegations echo Fritzl case - Just In (Australian Broadcasting Corporation)""Incest father jailed for 22 years""'Australian Fritzl' sentenced to 22 years in prison for abusing daughter for three decades""RSJ v The Queen"

Who is our nearest planetary neighbor, on average?Santa Claus flies to the South PoleSeven Spheres of Unequal Mass, a weighing problem with a twistDescribe a large integerFast Mental Calculation of $7.5^7$Math in Space (without the help of celebrities)Find the value of $bigstar$: Puzzle 8 - InequalityWho drinks beer while running anyway?A Crucial DeliveryRanking And AverageHow long will my money last at roulette?

Daza language Contents Vocabulary Phonology References External links Navigation menudaza1242Daza"Dazaga"eeee178086576