Fundemental group of $S^2$ with equator is identified $z sim z^3$ Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara Planned maintenance scheduled April 17/18, 2019 at 00:00UTC (8:00pm US/Eastern)Van Kampen with complicated attaching mapNeed help understanding statement of Van Kampen's Theorem and using it to compute the fundamental group of Projective PlaneUnion of 2-sphere with line segment in $mathbbR^3$ removing one point homotopy equivalence.A simple fundamental groupComputing fundamental group of the complement to three infinite straight lines, and of complement to $S^1 cup Z $Fundamental group of the sphere with two points identified.Fundamental group of the sphere with n-points identifiedHomotopy group of three spheresGiven a fundamental polygon and an attaching word, is the resulting space “unique?”Calculate the fundamental group of the 2-sphere with 2 disks removed

Compare a given version number in the form major.minor.build.patch and see if one is less than the other

Ring Automorphisms that fix 1.

Why aren't air breathing engines used as small first stages

How does debian/ubuntu knows a package has a updated version

How do I keep my slimes from escaping their pens?

What does an IRS interview request entail when called in to verify expenses for a sole proprietor small business?

3 doors, three guards, one stone

When do you get frequent flier miles - when you buy, or when you fly?

How to find out what spells would be useless to a blind NPC spellcaster?

Why did the Falcon Heavy center core fall off the ASDS OCISLY barge?

porting install scripts : can rpm replace apt?

Why did the IBM 650 use bi-quinary?

How to deal with a team lead who never gives me credit?

What is the logic behind the Maharil's explanation of why we don't say שעשה ניסים on Pesach?

First console to have temporary backward compatibility

How much time will it take to get my passport back if I am applying for multiple Schengen visa countries?

Novel: non-telepath helps overthrow rule by telepaths

Error "illegal generic type for instanceof" when using local classes

Should I use a zero-interest credit card for a large one-time purchase?

When a candle burns, why does the top of wick glow if bottom of flame is hottest?

List of Python versions

Do I really need recursive chmod to restrict access to a folder?

Is it fair for a professor to grade us on the possession of past papers?

Check which numbers satisfy the condition [A*B*C = A! + B! + C!]



Fundemental group of $S^2$ with equator is identified $z sim z^3$



Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara
Planned maintenance scheduled April 17/18, 2019 at 00:00UTC (8:00pm US/Eastern)Van Kampen with complicated attaching mapNeed help understanding statement of Van Kampen's Theorem and using it to compute the fundamental group of Projective PlaneUnion of 2-sphere with line segment in $mathbbR^3$ removing one point homotopy equivalence.A simple fundamental groupComputing fundamental group of the complement to three infinite straight lines, and of complement to $S^1 cup Z $Fundamental group of the sphere with two points identified.Fundamental group of the sphere with n-points identifiedHomotopy group of three spheresGiven a fundamental polygon and an attaching word, is the resulting space “unique?”Calculate the fundamental group of the 2-sphere with 2 disks removed










4












$begingroup$


You split a sphere in half at the equator and glue back together the boundaries with the function f:$S^1 rightarrow S^1$ that maps $z$ to $z^3$. What is the fundamental group of this space?



The exact statement of the question:




Cut a sphere $S^2$ through its equator and glue it back using the attaching map f:$S^1 rightarrow S^1$ defined by $f(z) = z^3$ . What is the fundamental group of this space?"




We take $S^1$ as the set of complex numbers with norm 1.



With Van kampen's theorem I compute the fundamental group as the trivial group. However, consider the path $gamma$ on the equator starting at some $x_0$ and moving $2pi/3$ degree around the equator. This path is correspond to a loop in the identification space. I fail to see how this path is homotopic to the trivial path.










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$







  • 1




    $begingroup$
    By "glueing $z$ to $z^3$", you view them as complex numbers with $|z| = 1$?
    $endgroup$
    – Tempestas Ludi
    Mar 26 at 19:02










  • $begingroup$
    Please include more detail. What $S^1$ do you exactly rotate? Do you rotate the entire upper hemisphere with it using the $z rightarrow z^3$ function and then paste it back? How exactly does your example path look like? Since $pi_1(S^2) = 1$, I don't see how your example is different from a regular $S^2$.
    $endgroup$
    – Daniel P
    Mar 26 at 19:05






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Nevermind, I get it now. Just had to think about it. So all points on the equator are equivalent to their cube, when viewed as a $|z| = 1$ complex number.
    $endgroup$
    – Daniel P
    Mar 26 at 19:13










  • $begingroup$
    Okay, let me write the exact statement in the question. Please see the edited version.
    $endgroup$
    – Baran Zadeoglu
    Mar 26 at 19:24










  • $begingroup$
    Please also include what path you exactly mean by "starting at some $x_0$ and moving $2pi/3$ degree around the equator". Is this a loop? Where exactly does it go?
    $endgroup$
    – Daniel P
    Mar 26 at 19:27















4












$begingroup$


You split a sphere in half at the equator and glue back together the boundaries with the function f:$S^1 rightarrow S^1$ that maps $z$ to $z^3$. What is the fundamental group of this space?



The exact statement of the question:




Cut a sphere $S^2$ through its equator and glue it back using the attaching map f:$S^1 rightarrow S^1$ defined by $f(z) = z^3$ . What is the fundamental group of this space?"




We take $S^1$ as the set of complex numbers with norm 1.



With Van kampen's theorem I compute the fundamental group as the trivial group. However, consider the path $gamma$ on the equator starting at some $x_0$ and moving $2pi/3$ degree around the equator. This path is correspond to a loop in the identification space. I fail to see how this path is homotopic to the trivial path.










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$







  • 1




    $begingroup$
    By "glueing $z$ to $z^3$", you view them as complex numbers with $|z| = 1$?
    $endgroup$
    – Tempestas Ludi
    Mar 26 at 19:02










  • $begingroup$
    Please include more detail. What $S^1$ do you exactly rotate? Do you rotate the entire upper hemisphere with it using the $z rightarrow z^3$ function and then paste it back? How exactly does your example path look like? Since $pi_1(S^2) = 1$, I don't see how your example is different from a regular $S^2$.
    $endgroup$
    – Daniel P
    Mar 26 at 19:05






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Nevermind, I get it now. Just had to think about it. So all points on the equator are equivalent to their cube, when viewed as a $|z| = 1$ complex number.
    $endgroup$
    – Daniel P
    Mar 26 at 19:13










  • $begingroup$
    Okay, let me write the exact statement in the question. Please see the edited version.
    $endgroup$
    – Baran Zadeoglu
    Mar 26 at 19:24










  • $begingroup$
    Please also include what path you exactly mean by "starting at some $x_0$ and moving $2pi/3$ degree around the equator". Is this a loop? Where exactly does it go?
    $endgroup$
    – Daniel P
    Mar 26 at 19:27













4












4








4


1



$begingroup$


You split a sphere in half at the equator and glue back together the boundaries with the function f:$S^1 rightarrow S^1$ that maps $z$ to $z^3$. What is the fundamental group of this space?



The exact statement of the question:




Cut a sphere $S^2$ through its equator and glue it back using the attaching map f:$S^1 rightarrow S^1$ defined by $f(z) = z^3$ . What is the fundamental group of this space?"




We take $S^1$ as the set of complex numbers with norm 1.



With Van kampen's theorem I compute the fundamental group as the trivial group. However, consider the path $gamma$ on the equator starting at some $x_0$ and moving $2pi/3$ degree around the equator. This path is correspond to a loop in the identification space. I fail to see how this path is homotopic to the trivial path.










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$




You split a sphere in half at the equator and glue back together the boundaries with the function f:$S^1 rightarrow S^1$ that maps $z$ to $z^3$. What is the fundamental group of this space?



The exact statement of the question:




Cut a sphere $S^2$ through its equator and glue it back using the attaching map f:$S^1 rightarrow S^1$ defined by $f(z) = z^3$ . What is the fundamental group of this space?"




We take $S^1$ as the set of complex numbers with norm 1.



With Van kampen's theorem I compute the fundamental group as the trivial group. However, consider the path $gamma$ on the equator starting at some $x_0$ and moving $2pi/3$ degree around the equator. This path is correspond to a loop in the identification space. I fail to see how this path is homotopic to the trivial path.







algebraic-topology homotopy-theory






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited Mar 26 at 19:28







Baran Zadeoglu

















asked Mar 26 at 18:23









Baran ZadeogluBaran Zadeoglu

546




546







  • 1




    $begingroup$
    By "glueing $z$ to $z^3$", you view them as complex numbers with $|z| = 1$?
    $endgroup$
    – Tempestas Ludi
    Mar 26 at 19:02










  • $begingroup$
    Please include more detail. What $S^1$ do you exactly rotate? Do you rotate the entire upper hemisphere with it using the $z rightarrow z^3$ function and then paste it back? How exactly does your example path look like? Since $pi_1(S^2) = 1$, I don't see how your example is different from a regular $S^2$.
    $endgroup$
    – Daniel P
    Mar 26 at 19:05






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Nevermind, I get it now. Just had to think about it. So all points on the equator are equivalent to their cube, when viewed as a $|z| = 1$ complex number.
    $endgroup$
    – Daniel P
    Mar 26 at 19:13










  • $begingroup$
    Okay, let me write the exact statement in the question. Please see the edited version.
    $endgroup$
    – Baran Zadeoglu
    Mar 26 at 19:24










  • $begingroup$
    Please also include what path you exactly mean by "starting at some $x_0$ and moving $2pi/3$ degree around the equator". Is this a loop? Where exactly does it go?
    $endgroup$
    – Daniel P
    Mar 26 at 19:27












  • 1




    $begingroup$
    By "glueing $z$ to $z^3$", you view them as complex numbers with $|z| = 1$?
    $endgroup$
    – Tempestas Ludi
    Mar 26 at 19:02










  • $begingroup$
    Please include more detail. What $S^1$ do you exactly rotate? Do you rotate the entire upper hemisphere with it using the $z rightarrow z^3$ function and then paste it back? How exactly does your example path look like? Since $pi_1(S^2) = 1$, I don't see how your example is different from a regular $S^2$.
    $endgroup$
    – Daniel P
    Mar 26 at 19:05






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Nevermind, I get it now. Just had to think about it. So all points on the equator are equivalent to their cube, when viewed as a $|z| = 1$ complex number.
    $endgroup$
    – Daniel P
    Mar 26 at 19:13










  • $begingroup$
    Okay, let me write the exact statement in the question. Please see the edited version.
    $endgroup$
    – Baran Zadeoglu
    Mar 26 at 19:24










  • $begingroup$
    Please also include what path you exactly mean by "starting at some $x_0$ and moving $2pi/3$ degree around the equator". Is this a loop? Where exactly does it go?
    $endgroup$
    – Daniel P
    Mar 26 at 19:27







1




1




$begingroup$
By "glueing $z$ to $z^3$", you view them as complex numbers with $|z| = 1$?
$endgroup$
– Tempestas Ludi
Mar 26 at 19:02




$begingroup$
By "glueing $z$ to $z^3$", you view them as complex numbers with $|z| = 1$?
$endgroup$
– Tempestas Ludi
Mar 26 at 19:02












$begingroup$
Please include more detail. What $S^1$ do you exactly rotate? Do you rotate the entire upper hemisphere with it using the $z rightarrow z^3$ function and then paste it back? How exactly does your example path look like? Since $pi_1(S^2) = 1$, I don't see how your example is different from a regular $S^2$.
$endgroup$
– Daniel P
Mar 26 at 19:05




$begingroup$
Please include more detail. What $S^1$ do you exactly rotate? Do you rotate the entire upper hemisphere with it using the $z rightarrow z^3$ function and then paste it back? How exactly does your example path look like? Since $pi_1(S^2) = 1$, I don't see how your example is different from a regular $S^2$.
$endgroup$
– Daniel P
Mar 26 at 19:05




1




1




$begingroup$
Nevermind, I get it now. Just had to think about it. So all points on the equator are equivalent to their cube, when viewed as a $|z| = 1$ complex number.
$endgroup$
– Daniel P
Mar 26 at 19:13




$begingroup$
Nevermind, I get it now. Just had to think about it. So all points on the equator are equivalent to their cube, when viewed as a $|z| = 1$ complex number.
$endgroup$
– Daniel P
Mar 26 at 19:13












$begingroup$
Okay, let me write the exact statement in the question. Please see the edited version.
$endgroup$
– Baran Zadeoglu
Mar 26 at 19:24




$begingroup$
Okay, let me write the exact statement in the question. Please see the edited version.
$endgroup$
– Baran Zadeoglu
Mar 26 at 19:24












$begingroup$
Please also include what path you exactly mean by "starting at some $x_0$ and moving $2pi/3$ degree around the equator". Is this a loop? Where exactly does it go?
$endgroup$
– Daniel P
Mar 26 at 19:27




$begingroup$
Please also include what path you exactly mean by "starting at some $x_0$ and moving $2pi/3$ degree around the equator". Is this a loop? Where exactly does it go?
$endgroup$
– Daniel P
Mar 26 at 19:27










2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes


















3












$begingroup$

Take the northern hemisphere $N$ and the southern hemisphere $S$. Identify $z in partial N$ with $z^3 in partial S$. Then the path $c(t) = exp(frac2pi i3 t), t in [0, 1]$, in the northern hemisphere gets identified with the path $h(t) = exp(2pi i~t)$ in the southern hemisphere which is a loop. In fact, it's a loop that traverses the equator of the southern hemisphere. Imagine that it's a rubber band, and it's attached to $S$ at the point $z = 1$, but everywhere else it's coated in grease. Now take the part of the rubber band near $z = -1$ and press it southward. It'll slip down, pass over the south pole, and eventually contract up to the point that you've held fixed at $z = 1$. And that's your homotopy.






share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$




















    2












    $begingroup$

    I think you are getting confused because the space you describe (which I'll call $X$) really has two different "equators". Note that $X$ is not simply the quotient of $S^2$ by an equivalence relation on the equator. Instead, $X$ is two hemispheres attached together where $z$ in the equator of one hemisphere is identified with $z^3$ in the equator of the other hemisphere.



    So, this does mean that a path on the first equator which goes around an arc of $2pi/3$ is a loop, since its endpoints become identified when you glue it to the second hemisphere. There is no nullhomotopy of this loop inside the first hemisphere. But when you look at this loop as living in the second hemisphere instead, it's just an ordinary loop that goes around the equator once. So, it is nullhomotopic inside the second hemisphere, which really is just homeomorphic to an ordinary disk (unlike the first hemisphere whose equator has gotten glued together).



    (If you instead had a space which is the quotient of $S^2$ by the equivalence relation $zsim e^2pi i/3z$ on the equator, then it would not be simply connected and indeed the loop going a third of the way around the equator would not be nullhomotopic.)






    share|cite|improve this answer









    $endgroup$













      Your Answer








      StackExchange.ready(function()
      var channelOptions =
      tags: "".split(" "),
      id: "69"
      ;
      initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

      StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
      // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
      if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
      StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
      createEditor();
      );

      else
      createEditor();

      );

      function createEditor()
      StackExchange.prepareEditor(
      heartbeatType: 'answer',
      autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
      convertImagesToLinks: true,
      noModals: true,
      showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
      reputationToPostImages: 10,
      bindNavPrevention: true,
      postfix: "",
      imageUploader:
      brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
      contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
      allowUrls: true
      ,
      noCode: true, onDemand: true,
      discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
      ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
      );



      );













      draft saved

      draft discarded


















      StackExchange.ready(
      function ()
      StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3163562%2ffundemental-group-of-s2-with-equator-is-identified-z-sim-z3%23new-answer', 'question_page');

      );

      Post as a guest















      Required, but never shown

























      2 Answers
      2






      active

      oldest

      votes








      2 Answers
      2






      active

      oldest

      votes









      active

      oldest

      votes






      active

      oldest

      votes









      3












      $begingroup$

      Take the northern hemisphere $N$ and the southern hemisphere $S$. Identify $z in partial N$ with $z^3 in partial S$. Then the path $c(t) = exp(frac2pi i3 t), t in [0, 1]$, in the northern hemisphere gets identified with the path $h(t) = exp(2pi i~t)$ in the southern hemisphere which is a loop. In fact, it's a loop that traverses the equator of the southern hemisphere. Imagine that it's a rubber band, and it's attached to $S$ at the point $z = 1$, but everywhere else it's coated in grease. Now take the part of the rubber band near $z = -1$ and press it southward. It'll slip down, pass over the south pole, and eventually contract up to the point that you've held fixed at $z = 1$. And that's your homotopy.






      share|cite|improve this answer











      $endgroup$

















        3












        $begingroup$

        Take the northern hemisphere $N$ and the southern hemisphere $S$. Identify $z in partial N$ with $z^3 in partial S$. Then the path $c(t) = exp(frac2pi i3 t), t in [0, 1]$, in the northern hemisphere gets identified with the path $h(t) = exp(2pi i~t)$ in the southern hemisphere which is a loop. In fact, it's a loop that traverses the equator of the southern hemisphere. Imagine that it's a rubber band, and it's attached to $S$ at the point $z = 1$, but everywhere else it's coated in grease. Now take the part of the rubber band near $z = -1$ and press it southward. It'll slip down, pass over the south pole, and eventually contract up to the point that you've held fixed at $z = 1$. And that's your homotopy.






        share|cite|improve this answer











        $endgroup$















          3












          3








          3





          $begingroup$

          Take the northern hemisphere $N$ and the southern hemisphere $S$. Identify $z in partial N$ with $z^3 in partial S$. Then the path $c(t) = exp(frac2pi i3 t), t in [0, 1]$, in the northern hemisphere gets identified with the path $h(t) = exp(2pi i~t)$ in the southern hemisphere which is a loop. In fact, it's a loop that traverses the equator of the southern hemisphere. Imagine that it's a rubber band, and it's attached to $S$ at the point $z = 1$, but everywhere else it's coated in grease. Now take the part of the rubber band near $z = -1$ and press it southward. It'll slip down, pass over the south pole, and eventually contract up to the point that you've held fixed at $z = 1$. And that's your homotopy.






          share|cite|improve this answer











          $endgroup$



          Take the northern hemisphere $N$ and the southern hemisphere $S$. Identify $z in partial N$ with $z^3 in partial S$. Then the path $c(t) = exp(frac2pi i3 t), t in [0, 1]$, in the northern hemisphere gets identified with the path $h(t) = exp(2pi i~t)$ in the southern hemisphere which is a loop. In fact, it's a loop that traverses the equator of the southern hemisphere. Imagine that it's a rubber band, and it's attached to $S$ at the point $z = 1$, but everywhere else it's coated in grease. Now take the part of the rubber band near $z = -1$ and press it southward. It'll slip down, pass over the south pole, and eventually contract up to the point that you've held fixed at $z = 1$. And that's your homotopy.







          share|cite|improve this answer














          share|cite|improve this answer



          share|cite|improve this answer








          edited Mar 26 at 19:46

























          answered Mar 26 at 19:33









          John HughesJohn Hughes

          65.5k24293




          65.5k24293





















              2












              $begingroup$

              I think you are getting confused because the space you describe (which I'll call $X$) really has two different "equators". Note that $X$ is not simply the quotient of $S^2$ by an equivalence relation on the equator. Instead, $X$ is two hemispheres attached together where $z$ in the equator of one hemisphere is identified with $z^3$ in the equator of the other hemisphere.



              So, this does mean that a path on the first equator which goes around an arc of $2pi/3$ is a loop, since its endpoints become identified when you glue it to the second hemisphere. There is no nullhomotopy of this loop inside the first hemisphere. But when you look at this loop as living in the second hemisphere instead, it's just an ordinary loop that goes around the equator once. So, it is nullhomotopic inside the second hemisphere, which really is just homeomorphic to an ordinary disk (unlike the first hemisphere whose equator has gotten glued together).



              (If you instead had a space which is the quotient of $S^2$ by the equivalence relation $zsim e^2pi i/3z$ on the equator, then it would not be simply connected and indeed the loop going a third of the way around the equator would not be nullhomotopic.)






              share|cite|improve this answer









              $endgroup$

















                2












                $begingroup$

                I think you are getting confused because the space you describe (which I'll call $X$) really has two different "equators". Note that $X$ is not simply the quotient of $S^2$ by an equivalence relation on the equator. Instead, $X$ is two hemispheres attached together where $z$ in the equator of one hemisphere is identified with $z^3$ in the equator of the other hemisphere.



                So, this does mean that a path on the first equator which goes around an arc of $2pi/3$ is a loop, since its endpoints become identified when you glue it to the second hemisphere. There is no nullhomotopy of this loop inside the first hemisphere. But when you look at this loop as living in the second hemisphere instead, it's just an ordinary loop that goes around the equator once. So, it is nullhomotopic inside the second hemisphere, which really is just homeomorphic to an ordinary disk (unlike the first hemisphere whose equator has gotten glued together).



                (If you instead had a space which is the quotient of $S^2$ by the equivalence relation $zsim e^2pi i/3z$ on the equator, then it would not be simply connected and indeed the loop going a third of the way around the equator would not be nullhomotopic.)






                share|cite|improve this answer









                $endgroup$















                  2












                  2








                  2





                  $begingroup$

                  I think you are getting confused because the space you describe (which I'll call $X$) really has two different "equators". Note that $X$ is not simply the quotient of $S^2$ by an equivalence relation on the equator. Instead, $X$ is two hemispheres attached together where $z$ in the equator of one hemisphere is identified with $z^3$ in the equator of the other hemisphere.



                  So, this does mean that a path on the first equator which goes around an arc of $2pi/3$ is a loop, since its endpoints become identified when you glue it to the second hemisphere. There is no nullhomotopy of this loop inside the first hemisphere. But when you look at this loop as living in the second hemisphere instead, it's just an ordinary loop that goes around the equator once. So, it is nullhomotopic inside the second hemisphere, which really is just homeomorphic to an ordinary disk (unlike the first hemisphere whose equator has gotten glued together).



                  (If you instead had a space which is the quotient of $S^2$ by the equivalence relation $zsim e^2pi i/3z$ on the equator, then it would not be simply connected and indeed the loop going a third of the way around the equator would not be nullhomotopic.)






                  share|cite|improve this answer









                  $endgroup$



                  I think you are getting confused because the space you describe (which I'll call $X$) really has two different "equators". Note that $X$ is not simply the quotient of $S^2$ by an equivalence relation on the equator. Instead, $X$ is two hemispheres attached together where $z$ in the equator of one hemisphere is identified with $z^3$ in the equator of the other hemisphere.



                  So, this does mean that a path on the first equator which goes around an arc of $2pi/3$ is a loop, since its endpoints become identified when you glue it to the second hemisphere. There is no nullhomotopy of this loop inside the first hemisphere. But when you look at this loop as living in the second hemisphere instead, it's just an ordinary loop that goes around the equator once. So, it is nullhomotopic inside the second hemisphere, which really is just homeomorphic to an ordinary disk (unlike the first hemisphere whose equator has gotten glued together).



                  (If you instead had a space which is the quotient of $S^2$ by the equivalence relation $zsim e^2pi i/3z$ on the equator, then it would not be simply connected and indeed the loop going a third of the way around the equator would not be nullhomotopic.)







                  share|cite|improve this answer












                  share|cite|improve this answer



                  share|cite|improve this answer










                  answered Mar 26 at 21:11









                  Eric WofseyEric Wofsey

                  193k14221352




                  193k14221352



























                      draft saved

                      draft discarded
















































                      Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


                      • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                      But avoid


                      • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                      • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

                      Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


                      To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                      draft saved


                      draft discarded














                      StackExchange.ready(
                      function ()
                      StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3163562%2ffundemental-group-of-s2-with-equator-is-identified-z-sim-z3%23new-answer', 'question_page');

                      );

                      Post as a guest















                      Required, but never shown





















































                      Required, but never shown














                      Required, but never shown












                      Required, but never shown







                      Required, but never shown

































                      Required, but never shown














                      Required, but never shown












                      Required, but never shown







                      Required, but never shown







                      Popular posts from this blog

                      Lowndes Grove History Architecture References Navigation menu32°48′6″N 79°57′58″W / 32.80167°N 79.96611°W / 32.80167; -79.9661132°48′6″N 79°57′58″W / 32.80167°N 79.96611°W / 32.80167; -79.9661178002500"National Register Information System"Historic houses of South Carolina"Lowndes Grove""+32° 48' 6.00", −79° 57' 58.00""Lowndes Grove, Charleston County (260 St. Margaret St., Charleston)""Lowndes Grove"The Charleston ExpositionIt Happened in South Carolina"Lowndes Grove (House), Saint Margaret Street & Sixth Avenue, Charleston, Charleston County, SC(Photographs)"Plantations of the Carolina Low Countrye

                      random experiment with two different functions on unit interval Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara Planned maintenance scheduled April 23, 2019 at 00:00UTC (8:00pm US/Eastern)Random variable and probability space notionsRandom Walk with EdgesFinding functions where the increase over a random interval is Poisson distributedNumber of days until dayCan an observed event in fact be of zero probability?Unit random processmodels of coins and uniform distributionHow to get the number of successes given $n$ trials , probability $P$ and a random variable $X$Absorbing Markov chain in a computer. Is “almost every” turned into always convergence in computer executions?Stopped random walk is not uniformly integrable

                      How should I support this large drywall patch? Planned maintenance scheduled April 23, 2019 at 00:00UTC (8:00pm US/Eastern) Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara Unicorn Meta Zoo #1: Why another podcast?How do I cover large gaps in drywall?How do I keep drywall around a patch from crumbling?Can I glue a second layer of drywall?How to patch long strip on drywall?Large drywall patch: how to avoid bulging seams?Drywall Mesh Patch vs. Bulge? To remove or not to remove?How to fix this drywall job?Prep drywall before backsplashWhat's the best way to fix this horrible drywall patch job?Drywall patching using 3M Patch Plus Primer