Prove that $A, B, C$ are independent (under certain conditions) Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara Planned maintenance scheduled April 17/18, 2019 at 00:00UTC (8:00pm US/Eastern)To prove the mutual independence of eventsShow that events $B$ and $C$ are independent.How to rigorously determine whether two events are independent?Let $A,B,C$ be mutually independent events. Show that $B$ is independent from ($A cap C$)'.Does $mathbbP(Xin A, Yin A)=mathbbP(Xin A)mathbbP(Yin A)$ for all $A$ borel sets imply $X$ and $Y$ are independent?Suppose that events $A$, $B$ and $C$ satisfy $P(A cap B cap C) = 0$ and each of them has probability not smaller than $frac23$. Find $P(A)$.Independent Events Conceptual Meaning - probability theoryGiven $A, B$, and $C$ are mutually independent events, find $ P(A cap B' cap C')$Prove that intersection of complement of event A with union of event B and C complement are independentQuestions about the independence of three events

Is it true that "carbohydrates are of no use for the basal metabolic need"?

Single word antonym of "flightless"

What to do with chalk when deepwater soloing?

Storing hydrofluoric acid before the invention of plastics

When a candle burns, why does the top of wick glow if bottom of flame is hottest?

Should I discuss the type of campaign with my players?

Using audio cues to encourage good posture

How do I keep my slimes from escaping their pens?

Echoing a tail command produces unexpected output?

Fundamental Solution of the Pell Equation

Do I really need recursive chmod to restrict access to a folder?

Identify plant with long narrow paired leaves and reddish stems

What causes the vertical darker bands in my photo?

What's the purpose of writing one's academic biography in the third person?

Bete Noir -- no dairy

English words in a non-english sci-fi novel

What does this icon in iOS Stardew Valley mean?

3 doors, three guards, one stone

Sci-Fi book where patients in a coma ward all live in a subconscious world linked together

How does the particle を relate to the verb 行く in the structure「A を + B に行く」?

2001: A Space Odyssey's use of the song "Daisy Bell" (Bicycle Built for Two); life imitates art or vice-versa?

If a contract sometimes uses the wrong name, is it still valid?

What is Arya's weapon design?

Why did the Falcon Heavy center core fall off the ASDS OCISLY barge?



Prove that $A, B, C$ are independent (under certain conditions)



Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara
Planned maintenance scheduled April 17/18, 2019 at 00:00UTC (8:00pm US/Eastern)To prove the mutual independence of eventsShow that events $B$ and $C$ are independent.How to rigorously determine whether two events are independent?Let $A,B,C$ be mutually independent events. Show that $B$ is independent from ($A cap C$)'.Does $mathbbP(Xin A, Yin A)=mathbbP(Xin A)mathbbP(Yin A)$ for all $A$ borel sets imply $X$ and $Y$ are independent?Suppose that events $A$, $B$ and $C$ satisfy $P(A cap B cap C) = 0$ and each of them has probability not smaller than $frac23$. Find $P(A)$.Independent Events Conceptual Meaning - probability theoryGiven $A, B$, and $C$ are mutually independent events, find $ P(A cap B' cap C')$Prove that intersection of complement of event A with union of event B and C complement are independentQuestions about the independence of three events










2












$begingroup$


Suppose:



  1. $A$ is independent from both $Bcap C$ and $B cup C$.


  2. $B$ is independent from $A cap C$.


  3. $C$ is independent from $A cap B$.


  4. $P(A), P(B), P(C)$ are all greater than zero.


Prove that $A, B, C$ are independent.



I know I have to show that the 3 events are all pairwise independent and that $P(Acap B cap C) = P(A) P(B) P(C)$.



Working with 1., I got to the equality $P(A cap B) + P(A cap C) = P(A) [P(Bcap C) + P(B cup C)]$, but I don't find it very useful. I tried several other approaches and they didn't work.



Could someone give me any hints? I'd also appreciate any intuition into how to solve these type of exercises. I always solve them by trial and error. Thanks!










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$
















    2












    $begingroup$


    Suppose:



    1. $A$ is independent from both $Bcap C$ and $B cup C$.


    2. $B$ is independent from $A cap C$.


    3. $C$ is independent from $A cap B$.


    4. $P(A), P(B), P(C)$ are all greater than zero.


    Prove that $A, B, C$ are independent.



    I know I have to show that the 3 events are all pairwise independent and that $P(Acap B cap C) = P(A) P(B) P(C)$.



    Working with 1., I got to the equality $P(A cap B) + P(A cap C) = P(A) [P(Bcap C) + P(B cup C)]$, but I don't find it very useful. I tried several other approaches and they didn't work.



    Could someone give me any hints? I'd also appreciate any intuition into how to solve these type of exercises. I always solve them by trial and error. Thanks!










    share|cite|improve this question











    $endgroup$














      2












      2








      2


      1



      $begingroup$


      Suppose:



      1. $A$ is independent from both $Bcap C$ and $B cup C$.


      2. $B$ is independent from $A cap C$.


      3. $C$ is independent from $A cap B$.


      4. $P(A), P(B), P(C)$ are all greater than zero.


      Prove that $A, B, C$ are independent.



      I know I have to show that the 3 events are all pairwise independent and that $P(Acap B cap C) = P(A) P(B) P(C)$.



      Working with 1., I got to the equality $P(A cap B) + P(A cap C) = P(A) [P(Bcap C) + P(B cup C)]$, but I don't find it very useful. I tried several other approaches and they didn't work.



      Could someone give me any hints? I'd also appreciate any intuition into how to solve these type of exercises. I always solve them by trial and error. Thanks!










      share|cite|improve this question











      $endgroup$




      Suppose:



      1. $A$ is independent from both $Bcap C$ and $B cup C$.


      2. $B$ is independent from $A cap C$.


      3. $C$ is independent from $A cap B$.


      4. $P(A), P(B), P(C)$ are all greater than zero.


      Prove that $A, B, C$ are independent.



      I know I have to show that the 3 events are all pairwise independent and that $P(Acap B cap C) = P(A) P(B) P(C)$.



      Working with 1., I got to the equality $P(A cap B) + P(A cap C) = P(A) [P(Bcap C) + P(B cup C)]$, but I don't find it very useful. I tried several other approaches and they didn't work.



      Could someone give me any hints? I'd also appreciate any intuition into how to solve these type of exercises. I always solve them by trial and error. Thanks!







      probability independence






      share|cite|improve this question















      share|cite|improve this question













      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question








      edited Mar 26 at 20:17







      John Doe

















      asked Mar 26 at 16:52









      John DoeJohn Doe

      1134




      1134




















          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          2












          $begingroup$

          I think you are on the right track.
          Let us start from the equation you got from hypothesis 1.
          begineqnarray
          P(Acap B) &=& P(A) cdot P(Bcup C) + P(A)cdot P(Bcap C)-P(Acap C)=\
          &=&P(A) [P(B) + P(C) - P(Bcap C)]+ P(A)cdot P(Bcap C)-P(Acap C)=\
          &=& P(A)cdot P(B) + P(A)cdot P(C) -P(Acap C).
          endeqnarray

          So we have
          beginequation
          P(Acap B) -P(A)cdot P(B) = P(A)cdot P(C) - P(Acap C).tag1label1
          endequation

          Now condition 4. makes me think that I could multiply both sides of eqref1 by $P(B)cdot P(C)$
          and get
          beginequation
          P(B)cdot P(C)cdot P(Acap B) -P(A)cdot P^2(B)cdot P(C) =\ =P(A)cdot P(B)cdot P^2(C) - P(B)cdot P(C)cdot P(Acap C).tag2label2
          endequation

          By hypothesis 2. and 3.
          beginequation
          P(Acap Bcap C) = P(B) cdot P(Acap C) = P(C) cdot P(Acap B),tag3label3
          endequation

          so that eqref2 yields
          beginequation
          P(B) cdot P(Acap Bcap C) -P(A)cdot P^2(B)cdot P(C) =\
          =P(A)cdot P(B)cdot P^2(C)-P(C) cdot P(Acap Bcap C),
          endequation

          that is
          beginequation
          [P(B) +P(C)]cdot [P(Acap Bcap C) -P(A)cdot P(B)cdot P(C)] = 0.
          endequation

          From the last equation you get
          beginequation
          P(Acap Bcap C) =P(A)cdot P(B)cdot P(C)tag4label4.
          endequation

          Use now eqref4 and eqref3 to get pairwise independence.




          As for the general intuition, my suggestion is to always ask yourself: "did I use all the hypotheses?", "How can I translate into mathematical terms the hypotheses I have not yet used?" Note also here, the hidden use of the expression relating probability of union and probability of intersection.






          share|cite|improve this answer











          $endgroup$













            Your Answer








            StackExchange.ready(function()
            var channelOptions =
            tags: "".split(" "),
            id: "69"
            ;
            initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

            StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
            // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
            if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
            StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
            createEditor();
            );

            else
            createEditor();

            );

            function createEditor()
            StackExchange.prepareEditor(
            heartbeatType: 'answer',
            autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
            convertImagesToLinks: true,
            noModals: true,
            showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
            reputationToPostImages: 10,
            bindNavPrevention: true,
            postfix: "",
            imageUploader:
            brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
            contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
            allowUrls: true
            ,
            noCode: true, onDemand: true,
            discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
            ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
            );



            );













            draft saved

            draft discarded


















            StackExchange.ready(
            function ()
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3163461%2fprove-that-a-b-c-are-independent-under-certain-conditions%23new-answer', 'question_page');

            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown

























            1 Answer
            1






            active

            oldest

            votes








            1 Answer
            1






            active

            oldest

            votes









            active

            oldest

            votes






            active

            oldest

            votes









            2












            $begingroup$

            I think you are on the right track.
            Let us start from the equation you got from hypothesis 1.
            begineqnarray
            P(Acap B) &=& P(A) cdot P(Bcup C) + P(A)cdot P(Bcap C)-P(Acap C)=\
            &=&P(A) [P(B) + P(C) - P(Bcap C)]+ P(A)cdot P(Bcap C)-P(Acap C)=\
            &=& P(A)cdot P(B) + P(A)cdot P(C) -P(Acap C).
            endeqnarray

            So we have
            beginequation
            P(Acap B) -P(A)cdot P(B) = P(A)cdot P(C) - P(Acap C).tag1label1
            endequation

            Now condition 4. makes me think that I could multiply both sides of eqref1 by $P(B)cdot P(C)$
            and get
            beginequation
            P(B)cdot P(C)cdot P(Acap B) -P(A)cdot P^2(B)cdot P(C) =\ =P(A)cdot P(B)cdot P^2(C) - P(B)cdot P(C)cdot P(Acap C).tag2label2
            endequation

            By hypothesis 2. and 3.
            beginequation
            P(Acap Bcap C) = P(B) cdot P(Acap C) = P(C) cdot P(Acap B),tag3label3
            endequation

            so that eqref2 yields
            beginequation
            P(B) cdot P(Acap Bcap C) -P(A)cdot P^2(B)cdot P(C) =\
            =P(A)cdot P(B)cdot P^2(C)-P(C) cdot P(Acap Bcap C),
            endequation

            that is
            beginequation
            [P(B) +P(C)]cdot [P(Acap Bcap C) -P(A)cdot P(B)cdot P(C)] = 0.
            endequation

            From the last equation you get
            beginequation
            P(Acap Bcap C) =P(A)cdot P(B)cdot P(C)tag4label4.
            endequation

            Use now eqref4 and eqref3 to get pairwise independence.




            As for the general intuition, my suggestion is to always ask yourself: "did I use all the hypotheses?", "How can I translate into mathematical terms the hypotheses I have not yet used?" Note also here, the hidden use of the expression relating probability of union and probability of intersection.






            share|cite|improve this answer











            $endgroup$

















              2












              $begingroup$

              I think you are on the right track.
              Let us start from the equation you got from hypothesis 1.
              begineqnarray
              P(Acap B) &=& P(A) cdot P(Bcup C) + P(A)cdot P(Bcap C)-P(Acap C)=\
              &=&P(A) [P(B) + P(C) - P(Bcap C)]+ P(A)cdot P(Bcap C)-P(Acap C)=\
              &=& P(A)cdot P(B) + P(A)cdot P(C) -P(Acap C).
              endeqnarray

              So we have
              beginequation
              P(Acap B) -P(A)cdot P(B) = P(A)cdot P(C) - P(Acap C).tag1label1
              endequation

              Now condition 4. makes me think that I could multiply both sides of eqref1 by $P(B)cdot P(C)$
              and get
              beginequation
              P(B)cdot P(C)cdot P(Acap B) -P(A)cdot P^2(B)cdot P(C) =\ =P(A)cdot P(B)cdot P^2(C) - P(B)cdot P(C)cdot P(Acap C).tag2label2
              endequation

              By hypothesis 2. and 3.
              beginequation
              P(Acap Bcap C) = P(B) cdot P(Acap C) = P(C) cdot P(Acap B),tag3label3
              endequation

              so that eqref2 yields
              beginequation
              P(B) cdot P(Acap Bcap C) -P(A)cdot P^2(B)cdot P(C) =\
              =P(A)cdot P(B)cdot P^2(C)-P(C) cdot P(Acap Bcap C),
              endequation

              that is
              beginequation
              [P(B) +P(C)]cdot [P(Acap Bcap C) -P(A)cdot P(B)cdot P(C)] = 0.
              endequation

              From the last equation you get
              beginequation
              P(Acap Bcap C) =P(A)cdot P(B)cdot P(C)tag4label4.
              endequation

              Use now eqref4 and eqref3 to get pairwise independence.




              As for the general intuition, my suggestion is to always ask yourself: "did I use all the hypotheses?", "How can I translate into mathematical terms the hypotheses I have not yet used?" Note also here, the hidden use of the expression relating probability of union and probability of intersection.






              share|cite|improve this answer











              $endgroup$















                2












                2








                2





                $begingroup$

                I think you are on the right track.
                Let us start from the equation you got from hypothesis 1.
                begineqnarray
                P(Acap B) &=& P(A) cdot P(Bcup C) + P(A)cdot P(Bcap C)-P(Acap C)=\
                &=&P(A) [P(B) + P(C) - P(Bcap C)]+ P(A)cdot P(Bcap C)-P(Acap C)=\
                &=& P(A)cdot P(B) + P(A)cdot P(C) -P(Acap C).
                endeqnarray

                So we have
                beginequation
                P(Acap B) -P(A)cdot P(B) = P(A)cdot P(C) - P(Acap C).tag1label1
                endequation

                Now condition 4. makes me think that I could multiply both sides of eqref1 by $P(B)cdot P(C)$
                and get
                beginequation
                P(B)cdot P(C)cdot P(Acap B) -P(A)cdot P^2(B)cdot P(C) =\ =P(A)cdot P(B)cdot P^2(C) - P(B)cdot P(C)cdot P(Acap C).tag2label2
                endequation

                By hypothesis 2. and 3.
                beginequation
                P(Acap Bcap C) = P(B) cdot P(Acap C) = P(C) cdot P(Acap B),tag3label3
                endequation

                so that eqref2 yields
                beginequation
                P(B) cdot P(Acap Bcap C) -P(A)cdot P^2(B)cdot P(C) =\
                =P(A)cdot P(B)cdot P^2(C)-P(C) cdot P(Acap Bcap C),
                endequation

                that is
                beginequation
                [P(B) +P(C)]cdot [P(Acap Bcap C) -P(A)cdot P(B)cdot P(C)] = 0.
                endequation

                From the last equation you get
                beginequation
                P(Acap Bcap C) =P(A)cdot P(B)cdot P(C)tag4label4.
                endequation

                Use now eqref4 and eqref3 to get pairwise independence.




                As for the general intuition, my suggestion is to always ask yourself: "did I use all the hypotheses?", "How can I translate into mathematical terms the hypotheses I have not yet used?" Note also here, the hidden use of the expression relating probability of union and probability of intersection.






                share|cite|improve this answer











                $endgroup$



                I think you are on the right track.
                Let us start from the equation you got from hypothesis 1.
                begineqnarray
                P(Acap B) &=& P(A) cdot P(Bcup C) + P(A)cdot P(Bcap C)-P(Acap C)=\
                &=&P(A) [P(B) + P(C) - P(Bcap C)]+ P(A)cdot P(Bcap C)-P(Acap C)=\
                &=& P(A)cdot P(B) + P(A)cdot P(C) -P(Acap C).
                endeqnarray

                So we have
                beginequation
                P(Acap B) -P(A)cdot P(B) = P(A)cdot P(C) - P(Acap C).tag1label1
                endequation

                Now condition 4. makes me think that I could multiply both sides of eqref1 by $P(B)cdot P(C)$
                and get
                beginequation
                P(B)cdot P(C)cdot P(Acap B) -P(A)cdot P^2(B)cdot P(C) =\ =P(A)cdot P(B)cdot P^2(C) - P(B)cdot P(C)cdot P(Acap C).tag2label2
                endequation

                By hypothesis 2. and 3.
                beginequation
                P(Acap Bcap C) = P(B) cdot P(Acap C) = P(C) cdot P(Acap B),tag3label3
                endequation

                so that eqref2 yields
                beginequation
                P(B) cdot P(Acap Bcap C) -P(A)cdot P^2(B)cdot P(C) =\
                =P(A)cdot P(B)cdot P^2(C)-P(C) cdot P(Acap Bcap C),
                endequation

                that is
                beginequation
                [P(B) +P(C)]cdot [P(Acap Bcap C) -P(A)cdot P(B)cdot P(C)] = 0.
                endequation

                From the last equation you get
                beginequation
                P(Acap Bcap C) =P(A)cdot P(B)cdot P(C)tag4label4.
                endequation

                Use now eqref4 and eqref3 to get pairwise independence.




                As for the general intuition, my suggestion is to always ask yourself: "did I use all the hypotheses?", "How can I translate into mathematical terms the hypotheses I have not yet used?" Note also here, the hidden use of the expression relating probability of union and probability of intersection.







                share|cite|improve this answer














                share|cite|improve this answer



                share|cite|improve this answer








                edited Mar 26 at 22:13

























                answered Mar 26 at 19:49









                MatteoMatteo

                1,3121313




                1,3121313



























                    draft saved

                    draft discarded
















































                    Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


                    • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                    But avoid


                    • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                    • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

                    Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


                    To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                    draft saved


                    draft discarded














                    StackExchange.ready(
                    function ()
                    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3163461%2fprove-that-a-b-c-are-independent-under-certain-conditions%23new-answer', 'question_page');

                    );

                    Post as a guest















                    Required, but never shown





















































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown

































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown







                    Popular posts from this blog

                    How should I support this large drywall patch? Planned maintenance scheduled April 23, 2019 at 00:00UTC (8:00pm US/Eastern) Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara Unicorn Meta Zoo #1: Why another podcast?How do I cover large gaps in drywall?How do I keep drywall around a patch from crumbling?Can I glue a second layer of drywall?How to patch long strip on drywall?Large drywall patch: how to avoid bulging seams?Drywall Mesh Patch vs. Bulge? To remove or not to remove?How to fix this drywall job?Prep drywall before backsplashWhat's the best way to fix this horrible drywall patch job?Drywall patching using 3M Patch Plus Primer

                    Lowndes Grove History Architecture References Navigation menu32°48′6″N 79°57′58″W / 32.80167°N 79.96611°W / 32.80167; -79.9661132°48′6″N 79°57′58″W / 32.80167°N 79.96611°W / 32.80167; -79.9661178002500"National Register Information System"Historic houses of South Carolina"Lowndes Grove""+32° 48' 6.00", −79° 57' 58.00""Lowndes Grove, Charleston County (260 St. Margaret St., Charleston)""Lowndes Grove"The Charleston ExpositionIt Happened in South Carolina"Lowndes Grove (House), Saint Margaret Street & Sixth Avenue, Charleston, Charleston County, SC(Photographs)"Plantations of the Carolina Low Countrye

                    Kathakali Contents Etymology and nomenclature History Repertoire Songs and musical instruments Traditional plays Styles: Sampradayam Training centers and awards Relationship to other dance forms See also Notes References External links Navigation menueThe Illustrated Encyclopedia of Hinduism: A-MSouth Asian Folklore: An EncyclopediaRoutledge International Encyclopedia of Women: Global Women's Issues and KnowledgeKathakali Dance-drama: Where Gods and Demons Come to PlayKathakali Dance-drama: Where Gods and Demons Come to PlayKathakali Dance-drama: Where Gods and Demons Come to Play10.1353/atj.2005.0004The Illustrated Encyclopedia of Hinduism: A-MEncyclopedia of HinduismKathakali Dance-drama: Where Gods and Demons Come to PlaySonic Liturgy: Ritual and Music in Hindu Tradition"The Mirror of Gesture"Kathakali Dance-drama: Where Gods and Demons Come to Play"Kathakali"Indian Theatre: Traditions of PerformanceIndian Theatre: Traditions of PerformanceIndian Theatre: Traditions of PerformanceIndian Theatre: Traditions of PerformanceMedieval Indian Literature: An AnthologyThe Oxford Companion to Indian TheatreSouth Asian Folklore: An Encyclopedia : Afghanistan, Bangladesh, India, Nepal, Pakistan, Sri LankaThe Rise of Performance Studies: Rethinking Richard Schechner's Broad SpectrumIndian Theatre: Traditions of PerformanceModern Asian Theatre and Performance 1900-2000Critical Theory and PerformanceBetween Theater and AnthropologyKathakali603847011Indian Theatre: Traditions of PerformanceIndian Theatre: Traditions of PerformanceIndian Theatre: Traditions of PerformanceBetween Theater and AnthropologyBetween Theater and AnthropologyNambeesan Smaraka AwardsArchivedThe Cambridge Guide to TheatreRoutledge International Encyclopedia of Women: Global Women's Issues and KnowledgeThe Garland Encyclopedia of World Music: South Asia : the Indian subcontinentThe Ethos of Noh: Actors and Their Art10.2307/1145740By Means of Performance: Intercultural Studies of Theatre and Ritual10.1017/s204912550000100xReconceiving the Renaissance: A Critical ReaderPerformance TheoryListening to Theatre: The Aural Dimension of Beijing Opera10.2307/1146013Kathakali: The Art of the Non-WorldlyOn KathakaliKathakali, the dance theatreThe Kathakali Complex: Performance & StructureKathakali Dance-Drama: Where Gods and Demons Come to Play10.1093/obo/9780195399318-0071Drama and Ritual of Early Hinduism"In the Shadow of Hollywood Orientalism: Authentic East Indian Dancing"10.1080/08949460490274013Sanskrit Play Production in Ancient IndiaIndian Music: History and StructureBharata, the Nāṭyaśāstra233639306Table of Contents2238067286469807Dance In Indian Painting10.2307/32047833204783Kathakali Dance-Theatre: A Visual Narrative of Sacred Indian MimeIndian Classical Dance: The Renaissance and BeyondKathakali: an indigenous art-form of Keralaeee